The only stats that claimed it was better than humans were the ones that didn't include this accident.
How many other lies have they told?
The big one is comparing 'autodrive' to all human driving, when autodrive only works in the safest traffic modes, and that isn't nearly as safe as humans on divided highways.
Samuel Adams, Gordon Biersch and Sierra Nevada all qualify IMHO.
Also American Beck's is now made in St Louis. Apparent InBev knows their other American breweries make an inferior product, as does anybody who ever had the misfortune of drinking anything that comes out of their CA brewery.
It sure tasted chemical. Pretty sure it was the genuine Shanghai water article.
This was 10+ years ago, when China's cost advantage was even bigger.
Haven't seen that beer before or since. I think BevMo just bought a bunch, one time.
A lot of the outsourced copies in N America are made in Canada. Fosters is just as bad as anywhere, Canadian Kingfisher is undrinkable, the genuine article is a good hot weather lager beer.
Everything you write is true, but Trump was still the better choice of the electable ones. But I'm in CA, so vote was wasted no matter, hence Vermin Supreme, the best candidate.
The only thing that mattered was the Supreme Court. Which is done now, will be double done when Ginsburg kicks.
Which brings the discussion back to it's start. The big money pro NN corporations. Like Netflix etc that paid for NN executive orders.
All to avoid Netflix having to pay for rackspace at the ISPs, like everybody else that wants space on a rack they don't own.
NN has never been the practical 'law' on the ground.
In my experience, many of its proponents can't even define NN. Think it bans QoS, rather than putting it's legal definition into the hands of DC shysters (what could go wrong?).
And then there was a 10-15 years of hyper-commercialized internet, then someone decided NN 'had to be' or the sky would fall. Then before NN was implemented it was repealed.
Slashdot Mirror
The way to get China to do that is to make the sender pay the freight. They minimize their costs, not anybody else's.
The only stats that claimed it was better than humans were the ones that didn't include this accident.
How many other lies have they told?
The big one is comparing 'autodrive' to all human driving, when autodrive only works in the safest traffic modes, and that isn't nearly as safe as humans on divided highways.
You are right below someone with a 9.4 second 0-60 car. They clearly allow 'slow moving vehicles' on the interstate.
Define 'mass produced'.
Samuel Adams, Gordon Biersch and Sierra Nevada all qualify IMHO.
Also American Beck's is now made in St Louis. Apparent InBev knows their other American breweries make an inferior product, as does anybody who ever had the misfortune of drinking anything that comes out of their CA brewery.
It sure tasted chemical. Pretty sure it was the genuine Shanghai water article.
This was 10+ years ago, when China's cost advantage was even bigger.
Haven't seen that beer before or since. I think BevMo just bought a bunch, one time.
A lot of the outsourced copies in N America are made in Canada. Fosters is just as bad as anywhere, Canadian Kingfisher is undrinkable, the genuine article is a good hot weather lager beer.
He's 70+. He doesn't care.
Everything you write is true, but Trump was still the better choice of the electable ones. But I'm in CA, so vote was wasted no matter, hence Vermin Supreme, the best candidate.
The only thing that mattered was the Supreme Court. Which is done now, will be double done when Ginsburg kicks.
IIRC I junked mine under Windows 2000. Which I did hang onto for a long time.
It worked for really simple documents.
How did you keep your 2 working?
I threw mine away a long time ago. It always ran out of memory while rendering the page.
HP could have written a better driver, but why would they?
Awesome hardware, bullet proof.
Lots of different recipes, most boil the grain. Some add the boiling Wort to more fresh water for a steep.
The boil recipes generally add additional malt after, for the large sugar breaking enzymes.
Is she single?
I've always wanted to meet a rich older woman too proud to let me work.
Cancer researcher supply is inelastic in the short term.
In the medium term, it will draw research effort from other diseases. e.g. AIDS research, when given 'moonshot' funding, slowed cancer research.
Only in the long term is there any chance to draw smart people into medical research.
I'm still with Vermin, but my vote can be had.
Put Hillary in prison and I'm for Trump.
Which brings the discussion back to it's start. The big money pro NN corporations. Like Netflix etc that paid for NN executive orders.
All to avoid Netflix having to pay for rackspace at the ISPs, like everybody else that wants space on a rack they don't own.
NN has never been the practical 'law' on the ground.
In my experience, many of its proponents can't even define NN. Think it bans QoS, rather than putting it's legal definition into the hands of DC shysters (what could go wrong?).
If only the market forces were strong enough, they'd turn me into a cancer research biochemist overnight! / sarc
Not making the point you think you are.
The Nazis brought permanent discredit onto Eugenics, after all the hard work of people like Margaret Sanger.
If true, good. The politicians whose worth goes up while in office are the _dirty_ ones. You know who those are.
What metrics? The ones that put the denominator at 15 million or 30 (the credible range for current wetback count)?
We, more or less, don't even know how many, much less what they're all up to.
I bet she runs in the primaries. But the Ds should give her zero votes.
She's too narcissistic not to try.
Keep it up.
You must have gotten Trump 20+ additional votes in 2020 already.
It was crewed entirely by qualified cancer researchers!
Because rich people are evil that way.
And then there was a 10-15 years of hyper-commercialized internet, then someone decided NN 'had to be' or the sky would fall. Then before NN was implemented it was repealed.
After you boil the sugar off grain, the remaining material makes great high protein animal feed.
Now you're repeating the neo-prohibitionist story. The law _never_ banned wheat beer. It just couldn't be called beer.
Most good German Pils and 'Pilsner' complies with the law to this day.
If it has corn in it, it's not beer by definition.
You are thinking of Buttwieser.
So: 'Smash Capitalism'?
Funny how that's always the answer.