You did indeed make your point.. Using several $3 words and acting arrogant doesn't make your logic valid. You called my opinion bs. That is infact an insult. BS indicates that I was purposely distorted the truth. That my non-buddy, is what you did. My logic is accurate. You insulted me personnaly. 100s of people disagreed with me and I didn't call them names. Many of them even seemed ignorant to me, but I only called you a moron, becuause you insulted my motives, not my opinion. You can stop being an arrogant anytime you wish. BTW, I'm sorry I called you a moron. I should have called you a s***head.
So I suppose if your dog can hear a note, and a spectrum analyzer can pick it up, but you can't hear it - Then the world is mad and you're the only sane one left.
If you don't care what my dog buys, why do you care what it can hear?
You weren't providing critism, you stated that a human being should trust a machine that provides data analysis above his or her own hearing on something as subjective as music. (that sounds like your bs not mine)
You denied my valid point, with rude comments intending to insult my valid statements and you referred to my opinions as bs. My point is proven. You are a close minded idiot, and those that support your perspective on this issue are mindless also.
If ears and hearing cannot be trusted, why do record companys and bands need audio engineers and producers? Why not plug in a hit song to spectrum analyizer and a solid state amp and just rake in the dough? Once again, buddy... get a life!
My dog doesn't buy CDs or records, moron!
Music stimulates feelings.. as in emotions, moron.
Can you understand that sometimes text doesn't have to be written to be understood. Its called context. That is why dorks like you don't understand why analog sound is better than digital sound.
I am sane.. I've posted 3 times to this site. Only when it matters. With 30000 posts, you are a little obsessed and nitpicky. Get a life!
The stuff in between my first and last sentences are my opinions, respect it.. At least I have one! You said almost nothing with your post. So..... comment away. Only another close-minded clicky idiot will validate your non-point.
Audio is subjective. Hearing is a feeling. No spectrum analyzer's results provide better data than my own hearing. Tube amps (and their limitless analog tone variations) can only be digitally mimicked at certain intervals. With that in mind, a tube amp has never be (and probably won't ever be) matched by a solid state POS.
Since all of Europe is so pleased with our rescent foreign policy, how about a picture of the white house and big GB Mugshot!
Joke 'em if they can't take a fu**!
Slashdot Mirror
I'm sure some junky has already figured out how to make meth out of it. :p
Sounds like a great idea.. porn should be limited to ports 1 to 50000. Hey, good work congress.. now we already have full compliance...
Time to pay-per-click "internet auctions" thru google, and sue google and ebay in 6 months when my fledgling internet auction site fails! :p
You did indeed make your point.. Using several $3 words and acting arrogant doesn't make your logic valid. You called my opinion bs. That is infact an insult. BS indicates that I was purposely distorted the truth. That my non-buddy, is what you did. My logic is accurate. You insulted me personnaly. 100s of people disagreed with me and I didn't call them names. Many of them even seemed ignorant to me, but I only called you a moron, becuause you insulted my motives, not my opinion. You can stop being an arrogant anytime you wish. BTW, I'm sorry I called you a moron. I should have called you a s***head.
So I suppose if your dog can hear a note, and a spectrum analyzer can pick it up, but you can't hear it - Then the world is mad and you're the only sane one left. If you don't care what my dog buys, why do you care what it can hear? You weren't providing critism, you stated that a human being should trust a machine that provides data analysis above his or her own hearing on something as subjective as music. (that sounds like your bs not mine) You denied my valid point, with rude comments intending to insult my valid statements and you referred to my opinions as bs. My point is proven. You are a close minded idiot, and those that support your perspective on this issue are mindless also. If ears and hearing cannot be trusted, why do record companys and bands need audio engineers and producers? Why not plug in a hit song to spectrum analyizer and a solid state amp and just rake in the dough? Once again, buddy... get a life!
My dog doesn't buy CDs or records, moron! Music stimulates feelings.. as in emotions, moron. Can you understand that sometimes text doesn't have to be written to be understood. Its called context. That is why dorks like you don't understand why analog sound is better than digital sound. I am sane.. I've posted 3 times to this site. Only when it matters. With 30000 posts, you are a little obsessed and nitpicky. Get a life! The stuff in between my first and last sentences are my opinions, respect it.. At least I have one! You said almost nothing with your post. So..... comment away. Only another close-minded clicky idiot will validate your non-point.
Audio is subjective. Hearing is a feeling. No spectrum analyzer's results provide better data than my own hearing. Tube amps (and their limitless analog tone variations) can only be digitally mimicked at certain intervals. With that in mind, a tube amp has never be (and probably won't ever be) matched by a solid state POS.
Since all of Europe is so pleased with our rescent foreign policy, how about a picture of the white house and big GB Mugshot! Joke 'em if they can't take a fu**!