Christians are supposed to be (by definition) followers of Christ. Christ believed in a literal creation (Matthew 13:34-35, 25:34, Mark 10:6, 13:19, 16:15, John 17:24). How can these individuals keep calling themselves "Christians" when they don't believe either Christ or the first book of the Bible?? Why can't they just admit to belonging to a tax-free club for purely social reasons, instead of giving genuine Christians a bad name?
Dinosaur skeletons can be classified as bird-hipped or lizard hipped. We also have exmaples of bird-hipped and bird footed. Why then do the 'experts' claim without a hint of sarcasm that birds evolved from the lizard-hipped variety (like t-rex)?
Also, if these remains show a feathered crest, and are so much OLDER than the dinosaurs which LATER evolved into birds, then does that mean I can be born before my grandparents?
Has anyone else heard of circular reasoning? It goes like this: "The fossils are very old because they were found in very old rocks. We know the rocks are very old because they had fossils in them!"
It's about time science made the theory fit the evidence, instead of trying to force the evidence in the theory. Science was SUPPOSED to be about finding a theory which could explain the observable facts. Too often now it's about making sure that only observations which are interpreted according to the most popular theory are allowed to be published. Questioning a theory is apparently forbidden by those who point the finger at religion for being fanatical.
Does this remind anyone of Monsanto etc. & GM plants?
1. We have a problem we can't solve because we don't understand things we didn't make ourselves
2. Find something to kill everything we didn't make ourselves
3. Change the pre-existing environment to protect our favoured parts from our solution
4. Find out that the problem has adapted and the solution doesn't work
5. Sue the pants off anyone who suggests that what we made is the problem, not the environment.
Slashdot Mirror
Christians are supposed to be (by definition) followers of Christ.
Christ believed in a literal creation (Matthew 13:34-35, 25:34, Mark 10:6, 13:19, 16:15, John 17:24).
How can these individuals keep calling themselves "Christians" when they don't believe either Christ or the first book of the Bible?? Why can't they just admit to belonging to a tax-free club for purely social reasons, instead of giving genuine Christians a bad name?
Dinosaur skeletons can be classified as bird-hipped or lizard hipped. We also have exmaples of bird-hipped and bird footed. Why then do the 'experts' claim without a hint of sarcasm that birds evolved from the lizard-hipped variety (like t-rex)?
Also, if these remains show a feathered crest, and are so much OLDER than the dinosaurs which LATER evolved into birds, then does that mean I can be born before my grandparents?
Has anyone else heard of circular reasoning? It goes like this: "The fossils are very old because they were found in very old rocks. We know the rocks are very old because they had fossils in them!"
It's about time science made the theory fit the evidence, instead of trying to force the evidence in the theory. Science was SUPPOSED to be about finding a theory which could explain the observable facts. Too often now it's about making sure that only observations which are interpreted according to the most popular theory are allowed to be published. Questioning a theory is apparently forbidden by those who point the finger at religion for being fanatical.
Does this remind anyone of Monsanto etc. & GM plants? 1. We have a problem we can't solve because we don't understand things we didn't make ourselves 2. Find something to kill everything we didn't make ourselves 3. Change the pre-existing environment to protect our favoured parts from our solution 4. Find out that the problem has adapted and the solution doesn't work 5. Sue the pants off anyone who suggests that what we made is the problem, not the environment.