Again with the NOTHING. That's getting really old.
If that's true then you are really quite juvenile emotionally. Do you have a job? A real one? If so I'm surprised that someone with such a juvenile mind could hold one down. Probably a Republican too.
Stop with the childish attitude. Really. You'll go a lot further in life.
or you just perceive from others what you really are yourself but are too cowardly to admit. You're the idiot, you're nothing. Read your posts, no civil person would talk that way.
You just proved my point to you. That you dont know what you are talking about and hide behind childish insults. No one will take you seriously if you act so immature.
I buy a TV that says it can display broadcast tv channels. Someone changes the broadcast standard so that analog is no longer available and I need a digital converter box.
Obviously then Sony is on the hook for false advertising since I can't watch TV any more!!
I hope you can see the difference, and I hope you'll understand why I don't think it's very funny.
Yes, Assange-Wikileaks releases confidential information getting good people killed in the process. Gawker creates a parody site that gives back a little medicine that Wikileaks are dishing out and does no real harm.
Basically if you expect everyone else to be open, you have to be open yourself. If Assange doesn't like that then he is a hypocrite.
You seem to say that a lot ot people who respond to you. Maybe you are just overcompensating for the fact you don't know what you are talking about and lack the social skills to carry on a mature and adult conversation?
Sony totally boned the PS3 lifetime, though. The degree of cluelessness with the little things and the amount of damage that they have done to such a technically impressive platform is just mind-boggling.
I don't think anything Sony did will affect sales in the slightest. This is a non-issue as the vast majority of the users simply dont care that an obscure and little used piece of functionality was removed. It was simply not cost effective for Sony to keep supporting it.
This lawsuit was ridiculous in that the guy was bound to lose since Sony did nothing wrong legally.
you partisanly or conveniently forgot to quote the next sentence in the story where it was quite obviously pointed out that THE ISSUE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH INTERPRETED CODE.
Really? The next sentence in the article is "Above is the 3.3.2 clause of the developer’s agreement that the reviewer kindly provided in an email. "
I dont think the next sentence says what you think it says.
TFS refers to "over 200 hits a month" how many of those are new people and how many are existing suscribers?
200 people looking at it once a month is not going to do it.
I think you misread it. Thats 2 million hits a month, not 2 hundred.
i never said the issue was with interpreted code. apple never said anything... let alone this being about interpreted code.... the REAL question is why are YOU talking about interpreted code?
From headline
The app had got into trouble for what Apple believes is being able to run interpreted code
From article
No interpreted code may be downloaded or used in an Application except for code that is interpreted and run by Apple’s Documented APIs and built-in interpreter(s).
Ok, if you don't believe my numbers, fine. Maybe Canada has better insulation standards than where ever you are.
But you didn't answer my questions as to what heats up quicker - a room with a south facing window or south facing wall? If windows and walls are basically the same insulation value as you say then both rooms would heat identically, which clearly they do not. If windows let more heat in than walls then it follows that they let more heat out.
If they get attacked that often, it shouldn't take long for them to find and confirm security holes in Windows. Yet they have been noticeably slow in patching some of those holes; why don't they respond quicker?
Do you really think any of those 7000 to 9000 attacks actually got through? No, so therefore they are already fixed. These are just stupid script kiddies learning to be terrorists. They are probably just modifying code fond on the net that has long since been protected against.
Yes thats a great idea. And I want to improve my marksmanship so I'm going to go shoot up some banks and a few police stations. I'm sure they will understand I'm only trying to improve my skills.
The side of windows matters a lot more than you think. Ask any energy expert. In fact do a thermal analysis of the heat loss in your house. If properly insulated, all heat loss will be through the windows.
U of 0.2 is R5. Even basic insulation on a 2x4 wall will give you R12 (U=0.08), and some new low-e houses use 6" walls on the exterior (staggered 2x4 so there is no direct path for heat from inside to outside) which will give you at least R22 (U=0.045). Windows are well over an order of magnitude less efficient than walls.
Still don't believe windows are a huge heat loss? Does your house heat up with the sun shining more with a wall, small window or big window? Clearly a big window lets in more heat from the sun. Heat goes both ways through a window so if it lets heat in it will let heat out too.
that doesn't make a lot of sense. The chips support OpenGL 4 in the hardware level. They just have to expose this in the driver so the apps can access it.
Unless it's a window on the south that can catch some sun. That will actually (partially) heat your house. Windows on other directions are indeed quite wasteful.
Yes, that's great and highly energy efficient (until the sun goes down).
In Scandinavia, triple glass windows (standard double glass with an additional window against it) are quite standard. Just curious how that is in other places around the world.
Triple pane is standard in Canada. Even better is double low-E but filled with Argon.
Sure, best window is about same as worst wall. Which means you can have as big windows as you like (within a reason).
What are you talking about? That statement doesn't make sense. The worst wall would be an uninsulated sheet of drywall. The best window will only ever get you to about R3 (and cost $500 to $1000 each) and typical windows are less than R1. A good wall would easily be R20 or more and not cost nearly that much. I don't understand how you can say you can have windows as big as you want. It would be impossible to keep heat in your house.
Insulation cost difference comparing "normal" and "low energy" house is minimal (~3%).
that's right for insulation in a wall. It's cheap to increase your walls and ceiling R value. But windows cannot go past R1 to R3 no matter what you do.
Slashdot Mirror
Why do you have so many alias names anyway? So you can mod people you don't like down, or mod yourself up?
Can you say anything other than NOTHING?
Again with the NOTHING. That's getting really old.
If that's true then you are really quite juvenile emotionally. Do you have a job? A real one? If so I'm surprised that someone with such a juvenile mind could hold one down. Probably a Republican too.
Stop with the childish attitude. Really. You'll go a lot further in life.
Yes you keep saying that to basically everyone. Kinda stupid of you to keep up a conversation with what you consider to be nothing.
Life will be hard for you when you crawl out of your parents basement.
or you just perceive from others what you really are yourself but are too cowardly to admit. You're the idiot, you're nothing. Read your posts, no civil person would talk that way.
Grow up little baby.
You are just upset cause I'm pointing out you don't know what you are talking about.
Grow up, or at least go away and stop bothering the adults when we are having a conversation.
You just proved my point to you. That you dont know what you are talking about and hide behind childish insults. No one will take you seriously if you act so immature.
I buy a TV that says it can display broadcast tv channels. Someone changes the broadcast standard so that analog is no longer available and I need a digital converter box.
Obviously then Sony is on the hook for false advertising since I can't watch TV any more!!
Please provide a credible citation stating that no one has been killed due to the leaked information.
I hope you can see the difference, and I hope you'll understand why I don't think it's very funny.
Yes, Assange-Wikileaks releases confidential information getting good people killed in the process. Gawker creates a parody site that gives back a little medicine that Wikileaks are dishing out and does no real harm.
Basically if you expect everyone else to be open, you have to be open yourself. If Assange doesn't like that then he is a hypocrite.
you are NOTHING
You seem to say that a lot ot people who respond to you. Maybe you are just overcompensating for the fact you don't know what you are talking about and lack the social skills to carry on a mature and adult conversation?
Grow up and get a life.
Sony totally boned the PS3 lifetime, though. The degree of cluelessness with the little things and the amount of damage that they have done to such a technically impressive platform is just mind-boggling.
I don't think anything Sony did will affect sales in the slightest. This is a non-issue as the vast majority of the users simply dont care that an obscure and little used piece of functionality was removed. It was simply not cost effective for Sony to keep supporting it.
This lawsuit was ridiculous in that the guy was bound to lose since Sony did nothing wrong legally.
you partisanly or conveniently forgot to quote the next sentence in the story where it was quite obviously pointed out that THE ISSUE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH INTERPRETED CODE.
Really? The next sentence in the article is "Above is the 3.3.2 clause of the developer’s agreement that the reviewer kindly provided in an email. "
I dont think the next sentence says what you think it says.
TFS refers to "over 200 hits a month" how many of those are new people and how many are existing suscribers? 200 people looking at it once a month is not going to do it.
I think you misread it. Thats 2 million hits a month, not 2 hundred.
i never said the issue was with interpreted code. apple never said anything... let alone this being about interpreted code.... the REAL question is why are YOU talking about interpreted code?
From headline
The app had got into trouble for what Apple believes is being able to run interpreted code
From article
No interpreted code may be downloaded or used in an Application except for code that is interpreted and run by Apple’s Documented APIs and built-in interpreter(s).
Ok, if you don't believe my numbers, fine. Maybe Canada has better insulation standards than where ever you are.
But you didn't answer my questions as to what heats up quicker - a room with a south facing window or south facing wall? If windows and walls are basically the same insulation value as you say then both rooms would heat identically, which clearly they do not. If windows let more heat in than walls then it follows that they let more heat out.
A 2x4 wall with insulation (vapour barrier and siding of course) will give you R12. This is a basic modern insulated wall.
If they get attacked that often, it shouldn't take long for them to find and confirm security holes in Windows. Yet they have been noticeably slow in patching some of those holes; why don't they respond quicker?
Do you really think any of those 7000 to 9000 attacks actually got through? No, so therefore they are already fixed. These are just stupid script kiddies learning to be terrorists. They are probably just modifying code fond on the net that has long since been protected against.
Yes thats a great idea. And I want to improve my marksmanship so I'm going to go shoot up some banks and a few police stations. I'm sure they will understand I'm only trying to improve my skills.
R is simply 1/U
The side of windows matters a lot more than you think. Ask any energy expert. In fact do a thermal analysis of the heat loss in your house. If properly insulated, all heat loss will be through the windows.
U of 0.2 is R5. Even basic insulation on a 2x4 wall will give you R12 (U=0.08), and some new low-e houses use 6" walls on the exterior (staggered 2x4 so there is no direct path for heat from inside to outside) which will give you at least R22 (U=0.045). Windows are well over an order of magnitude less efficient than walls.
Still don't believe windows are a huge heat loss? Does your house heat up with the sun shining more with a wall, small window or big window? Clearly a big window lets in more heat from the sun. Heat goes both ways through a window so if it lets heat in it will let heat out too.
that doesn't make a lot of sense. The chips support OpenGL 4 in the hardware level. They just have to expose this in the driver so the apps can access it.
Sorry - mistyped. Should have been 2000sq ft.
Unless it's a window on the south that can catch some sun. That will actually (partially) heat your house. Windows on other directions are indeed quite wasteful.
Yes, that's great and highly energy efficient (until the sun goes down).
In Scandinavia, triple glass windows (standard double glass with an additional window against it) are quite standard. Just curious how that is in other places around the world.
Triple pane is standard in Canada. Even better is double low-E but filled with Argon.
Sure, best window is about same as worst wall. Which means you can have as big windows as you like (within a reason).
What are you talking about? That statement doesn't make sense. The worst wall would be an uninsulated sheet of drywall. The best window will only ever get you to about R3 (and cost $500 to $1000 each) and typical windows are less than R1. A good wall would easily be R20 or more and not cost nearly that much. I don't understand how you can say you can have windows as big as you want. It would be impossible to keep heat in your house.
Insulation cost difference comparing "normal" and "low energy" house is minimal (~3%).
that's right for insulation in a wall. It's cheap to increase your walls and ceiling R value. But windows cannot go past R1 to R3 no matter what you do.
Agreed. So insulating a full 200sq ft house would be abut $10k or so. Again not nothing but not ridiculous and more than worth it.
What's your point? Hemp's not illegal. I even own a hemp golf shirt - feels great!