The condescending arrogance of your statement is overwhelming.
True scientists believe in evidence. If you follow the evidence, leaving out hypothesis and conjecture, you will find the majority of factual evidence does not support evolution.
I am not suggesting that the "48%" have arguments based in fact, but in this case the evidence is on their side.
Slashdot Mirror
The condescending arrogance of your statement is overwhelming. True scientists believe in evidence. If you follow the evidence, leaving out hypothesis and conjecture, you will find the majority of factual evidence does not support evolution. I am not suggesting that the "48%" have arguments based in fact, but in this case the evidence is on their side.