Does this mean you can "pirate" all you want as you've already paid? So long as the booty passes through an MP3 player first, of course...
No, this means copyright owners get even more $$$.
... how can people get fooled n-times. First you pay tax when buying DRM protected music, that can't be played on your player (remember the BBC story about britons being frustrated with DRM?), then you pay tax *just in case* the music you store on your player is stolen. I mean WT*!! Isn't it enough to have to pay a very similar tax for all storage devices?
The article is released under CC license, written by A. Linux Kernel.
So if A. Linux Kernel doesn't want to marry A. Windows Kernel, it won't. A. Linux Kernel has much more open mind than any Mr. Kernel I've met and I believe A. Windows Kernel would go red on some of his details, if they got out.
Slashdot Mirror
http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=24 10
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2005/05/09/amd_a6 4x2_4800/1.html
two more reviews.
Does this mean you can "pirate" all you want as you've already paid? So long as the booty passes through an MP3 player first, of course... No, this means copyright owners get even more $$$.
... how can people get fooled n-times. First you pay tax when buying DRM protected music, that can't be played on your player (remember the BBC story about britons being frustrated with DRM?), then you pay tax *just in case* the music you store on your player is stolen. I mean WT*!! Isn't it enough to have to pay a very similar tax for all storage devices?
... to think ms wouldn't use all it has. Obviously it hasn't yet learned from google, that being evil is bad. And bad guys get punished.
Has anybody tried running it under amd64?
The article is released under CC license, written by A. Linux Kernel.
So if A. Linux Kernel doesn't want to marry A. Windows Kernel, it won't. A. Linux Kernel has much more open mind than any Mr. Kernel I've met and I believe A. Windows Kernel would go red on some of his details, if they got out.
Hmmm.. interesting. Does it seem like RIM wants M$ to help them if the speaker was hosted by RIM?
... the guilty survives.