I read the article, and possibly might be low on caffine, but what rights besides 'We have a book titled of the same name...' does the publisher have to make such threats. Are the threats even valid? Seems like a classic case of school yard bully.
And if Jones has proof (Records, Receipts, Etc) wouldn't that stand out more in a court than 3 guys in a suit holding a book that was published more recently?
And it's a bit Ironic (as probably pointed out 100x times by now.) that a lawyer, representing an Author of a book based on helping other victims of Internet Abuses and Stalkers is freely open to email an owner of a domain they want and threaten them?
Slashdot Mirror
I read the article, and possibly might be low on caffine, but what rights besides 'We have a book titled of the same name...' does the publisher have to make such threats. Are the threats even valid? Seems like a classic case of school yard bully.
And if Jones has proof (Records, Receipts, Etc) wouldn't that stand out more in a court than 3 guys in a suit holding a book that was published more recently?
And it's a bit Ironic (as probably pointed out 100x times by now.) that a lawyer, representing an Author of a book based on helping other victims of Internet Abuses and Stalkers is freely open to email an owner of a domain they want and threaten them?