The other trouble I've had is prerequisites being poorly defined.
I tried to take an AI course that said the only requirement was algebra. Sure! Suddenly, calculus! Though I struggled through that as I've had some prior exposure, what put the tombstone down for me was probability. I just couldn't wrap my head around it, and the course assumed you already understood it all.
Well, the neat part about operating in the reactive near-field is the reception is detectable. I'm not 100% on how it works, but I remember that much from studying for my ham license.
I don't know if it's possible to fake that phenomena.
(I am fully aware that deauths happen outside of encryption and that's how aircrack and the like work. I was, perhaps naively, hoping this 'product' wouldn't exploit that.)
Are you able to perform the inverse though (send data to it) in a way that isn't "detectable" - specifically if it was intended for reactive near-field?
The real danger isn't so much the receipt of information as it is the ability to send data to it (commands, fuzzing, etc)
I didn't say NFC. I said Near Field. "Near Field" is a very specific thing.
If your antenna is more distant than the near-field you are not in the near-field, but in the far-field. You can probably figure out how to communicate, I'd imagine that the real trick is synchronizing your oscillator (but this is a solved problem - radios do it all the time) but certainly any schmuck with a laptop or smartphone wouldn't be able to do it - you're going to need extra equipment.
"Near Field" is a very specific thing. Whatever you're thinking of there, certainly isn't what I'm talking about - the near field of 2.4ghz would be around 1/10 of a meter away and no further.
Sure. I routinely transfer stuff with a rate of several megabtyes per second. Ignoring overhead, 4mbps would get me 0.5MB/s at most, and that's down. Upload would be 1/4 of that!!!
Oh, well it could well be made up of platinum or whatever, but that's not going to get you any energy usable for propulsion out of it.
If the intent is to capture resources, that's different. This twerp was asking about using it for travel. Completely different mission profile.... oh, and I'm a space nutter myself, thank you very much.
How does Forge fit into all this (if at all?) I've never been to clear on that. Back when I used Bukkit, I was under the impression that Bukkit linked against something called forge, but I don't think that's correct.
My server's a distribution by feed-the-beast now, since it takes almost all of the pain out of the process. I know that's using Forge for sure, but there's an awful lot of moving parts in there and I'm cloudy on what's going on.
I wonder if the hackers understand the irony of fucking with objects in permanent orbit.
I don't think that really matters, because said objects are not in permanent orbit.
The ISS is in LEO, and is still interfacing with the atmosphere. It must be routinely nudged prograde to prevent it from deorbiting. Even if this cubesat "cannon" had the delta-V to push one of these into a high enough orbit to get away from this truth, the cubesat has no means to perform a complimentary maneuver at the top of the orbit and it's peri will remain interfaced with the atmosphere and it will fall back to earth.
Because that's as much time as it takes you to realize you'd spend just as much (more, actually) energy to rendezvous with it, only to find out that it's now (relative to you) a stationary chunk of inert materials.
Slashdot Mirror
The other trouble I've had is prerequisites being poorly defined.
I tried to take an AI course that said the only requirement was algebra. Sure! Suddenly, calculus! Though I struggled through that as I've had some prior exposure, what put the tombstone down for me was probability. I just couldn't wrap my head around it, and the course assumed you already understood it all.
Oh! I think I remember what goes on, now. The antennas are inductively coupled. If that helps!
Well, the neat part about operating in the reactive near-field is the reception is detectable. I'm not 100% on how it works, but I remember that much from studying for my ham license.
I don't know if it's possible to fake that phenomena.
Oh, lovely.
(I am fully aware that deauths happen outside of encryption and that's how aircrack and the like work. I was, perhaps naively, hoping this 'product' wouldn't exploit that.)
How long do those trips to the bathroom or for coffee take? You might already be getting your hourly 5 in...
A vague splotch of color moving about isn't much more informative than a black screen.
I read that as it operates within a particular network.
Unless you go onto their wifi with this, I don't see it doing anything?
Are you able to perform the inverse though (send data to it) in a way that isn't "detectable" - specifically if it was intended for reactive near-field?
The real danger isn't so much the receipt of information as it is the ability to send data to it (commands, fuzzing, etc)
The microcontroller runs at that speed. The x86 CPU is 500mhz dual-core.
I didn't say NFC. I said Near Field. "Near Field" is a very specific thing.
If your antenna is more distant than the near-field you are not in the near-field, but in the far-field. You can probably figure out how to communicate, I'd imagine that the real trick is synchronizing your oscillator (but this is a solved problem - radios do it all the time) but certainly any schmuck with a laptop or smartphone wouldn't be able to do it - you're going to need extra equipment.
"Near Field" is a very specific thing. Whatever you're thinking of there, certainly isn't what I'm talking about - the near field of 2.4ghz would be around 1/10 of a meter away and no further.
I don't have any problems if it was broadcasting data, but if it's a 2-way communication (at layer 1) then they can fuck right off.
If you want to communicate, plug something in (or use near-field etc)
Mps? k? What are these odd units I'm seeing here?
(also, that joke hasn't been funny for at least 10 years)
Steam says hello.
Games are large, these days, and I for one enjoy being able to download what I just bought at a reasonable speed.
Sure. I routinely transfer stuff with a rate of several megabtyes per second. Ignoring overhead, 4mbps would get me 0.5MB/s at most, and that's down. Upload would be 1/4 of that!!!
Have you looked at an atlas lately? Take your speed and divide it by populated area.
Now take that figure and multiply it by our populated area. I think you'll find a significant difference.
Getting that kind of speed here, at the same density, is fucking expensive.
While I don't own a gun, it's times like these I wish I fucking did.
... I'm glad you don't. I certainly hate them too, but you don't see me reaching for my rifle! Schmucks like you give gun-banners something to wield.
Yes, well, when your whole country is the size of one or two of our states...
The US is pretty freaking large, and we're fairly spread out - even on the coast.
Wake me up when you can go to a random hovel in Siberia and get those speeds... because that would be a closer comparison than what you're saying.
It's not your connection that's to blame for your trouble with Youtube.
Oh, well it could well be made up of platinum or whatever, but that's not going to get you any energy usable for propulsion out of it.
If the intent is to capture resources, that's different. This twerp was asking about using it for travel. Completely different mission profile. ... oh, and I'm a space nutter myself, thank you very much.
How does Forge fit into all this (if at all?) I've never been to clear on that. Back when I used Bukkit, I was under the impression that Bukkit linked against something called forge, but I don't think that's correct.
My server's a distribution by feed-the-beast now, since it takes almost all of the pain out of the process. I know that's using Forge for sure, but there's an awful lot of moving parts in there and I'm cloudy on what's going on.
The line between producer and DJ isn't as sharp as it used to be. What would you call this?
I've seen a video of deadmau5 at work. While I (of course!) can't find it now, he was using something similar to achieve the same.
I wonder if the hackers understand the irony of fucking with objects in permanent orbit.
I don't think that really matters, because said objects are not in permanent orbit.
The ISS is in LEO, and is still interfacing with the atmosphere. It must be routinely nudged prograde to prevent it from deorbiting. Even if this cubesat "cannon" had the delta-V to push one of these into a high enough orbit to get away from this truth, the cubesat has no means to perform a complimentary maneuver at the top of the orbit and it's peri will remain interfaced with the atmosphere and it will fall back to earth.
We already are, but NASA gets far less funding than fucking around over in various shitholes around the world.
For about 5 seconds.
Because that's as much time as it takes you to realize you'd spend just as much (more, actually) energy to rendezvous with it, only to find out that it's now (relative to you) a stationary chunk of inert materials.