Slashdot Mirror


User: X0563511

X0563511's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
10,035
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 10,035

  1. Re:Poses a Threat? on Large Solar Flare To Glance Off Earth · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure we would have noticed such an event in the sedimentary rock.

  2. Re:Careful with anecdotes on Man Barred From Being Alone With Daughter After Informing Police of Porn On PC · · Score: 2

    Local police are usually pretty cool. It seems it's the state/federal ones that have sticks up their asses. That probably grows on them with the job, if you think about it.

  3. Re:I've said it before... on Man Barred From Being Alone With Daughter After Informing Police of Porn On PC · · Score: 2

    Congratulations!! You've forgotten the difference between local, state, and federal police! You've also forgotten about this wonderful thing called Jurisdiction!

    The local police that he refers to as "pretty nice and helpful" will be overridden by the assholes.

  4. Re:I thought this was known by now on Man Barred From Being Alone With Daughter After Informing Police of Porn On PC · · Score: 2

    The ban on being alone with his daughter seems overly harsh but I can appreciate why.

    You're not a parent obviously.

    How so? You missed the part where he said "The ban on being alone with his daughter seems overly harsh"?

    You seem to be one of those people who insist on confusing "understand" with "condone."

  5. Re:I thought this was known by now on Man Barred From Being Alone With Daughter After Informing Police of Porn On PC · · Score: 1

    Yes. Think of the children. But don't "think" of the children. ... at least, that's how politicians say it should be.

  6. Re:I thought this was known by now on Man Barred From Being Alone With Daughter After Informing Police of Porn On PC · · Score: 1

    Sexual acts with adult woman are not morally reprehensible acts (according to society), like it is with children. That's the difference.

    Now, I agree with you that this whole thing is retarded.

    Sure, look into him. But don't take fucking 4 months to figure it out, meanwhile not allowing him to be alone with his children.

  7. Re:Remove one head..... on Anonymous Defaces Panda Security Site · · Score: 1

    referring to a group of single/known gender people in the third person?

    He/him/his/etc
    She,her,hers/etc

    to refer to a group of only men, or to a group of only women?

    It's actually not just one word that is used:
    Those men
    Those women

  8. Re:wordpress, again? on 30K WordPress Blogs Infected With the Latest Malware Scam · · Score: 1

    What?

    What does apache have to do with it? The idiot was talking about OS auto updating, which I pointed out had nothing to do with anything.

    I then went on to say that even if it DID have anything to do with it, he was wrong anyway.

  9. Re:wordpress, again? on 30K WordPress Blogs Infected With the Latest Malware Scam · · Score: 1

    That's funny, that's all I'm hearing from YOU, the AC.

  10. Re:...huh? on Anonymous Defaces Panda Security Site · · Score: 1

    People who also break into computer systems and deface web sites? A handful.

    Unfortunately not.

  11. Re:Remove one head..... on Anonymous Defaces Panda Security Site · · Score: 1

    Yes. It's an interesting word that is used when referring to a group of mixed/known gender people in third person.

  12. Re:Remove one head..... on Anonymous Defaces Panda Security Site · · Score: 1

    Yes and no. I see it this way:

    They did the risk analysis and determined that putting all kinds of effort into making their external webserver was not worth it. This gives them more resources to secure what actually matters, the internal stuff.

  13. Re:wordpress, again? on 30K WordPress Blogs Infected With the Latest Malware Scam · · Score: 1

    Er, no. Try again. Preferably with more reading comprehension.

  14. Re:stop replying on The Mercedes-Benz 'Cloaking Device' · · Score: 1

    Because it's the SUBJECT box, not the COMMENT box. You put the SUBJECT in it, not your COMMENT .

    In regards to my use of fucking: It's not a "modifier," it's a fucking adjective - and in this usage it is well known to indicate amplified emotion (usually negative).

    English: do you understand it?

  15. Re:wordpress, again? on 30K WordPress Blogs Infected With the Latest Malware Scam · · Score: 1

    It is neither installed or mentioned during a standard system installation. That's the difference.

  16. Re:Its 2012 and yet still... on 30K WordPress Blogs Infected With the Latest Malware Scam · · Score: 3, Informative

    Are you an idiot? The article is talking about WORDPRESS - a web application! Windows isn't involved!

  17. Re:wordpress, again? on 30K WordPress Blogs Infected With the Latest Malware Scam · · Score: 1

    That has anything to do with Wordpress?

    Doesn't even make sense. Windows has automatic updating, something Linux distros are just starting to do (notifying has been around for a while, but automatically acting is "new")

  18. Re:McAfee? on 30K WordPress Blogs Infected With the Latest Malware Scam · · Score: 0

    What a useful comment!

  19. Re:SSDD on The Ineffectiveness of TSA Body Scanners · · Score: 1

    Well, speaking from my perspective:

    I don't fly when possible because it's so damn expensive these days... not because of the security.

    If I do have to fly: I calmly opt out, and grin and bear it - just like the poor sap who has to search me.

  20. Re:SSDD on The Ineffectiveness of TSA Body Scanners · · Score: 1

    Not so easy. Every additional person brought into the operation significantly raises the chances of things going wrong such as detection, mistakes happening, etc.

    Look at it from the perspective of it being an intelligence or other clandestine operation - because it shares almost all of the characteristics but with a different objective.

  21. Re:SSDD on The Ineffectiveness of TSA Body Scanners · · Score: 1

    B especially you have taken too literally. It's an idiom.

  22. Re:An alternative on The Ineffectiveness of TSA Body Scanners · · Score: 1

    +(over nine thousand)

    (it's not impossible)

  23. Re:Frost Piss on The Ineffectiveness of TSA Body Scanners · · Score: 1

    Overpriced? Perhaps.

    Significant fucking figures cheaper than "playing the game" though.

  24. stop replying on The Mercedes-Benz 'Cloaking Device' · · Score: 2

    in the subject box! fucking seriously!

  25. Re:Handbrake Plug on Warner Bros: New Program To Digitize Your DVDs · · Score: 1

    Sounds like structure protection.

    dvddecryptor could have probably done that and given you an output ISO or VOB files to use with your ripper of choice (it doesn't encode, just removes CSS and other protections)