GPLv3: As censorship is fundamentally incompatible with freedom of speech, you may not speak in support of censorship. Actually it's more like:
As censorship is fundamentally incompatible with freedom of speech, you may not say anything along the lines of "With the authority of the President I declare don't say XYZ" unless you give people the right to repeal the declarations for their own as they wish.
Depends. Which side of the mecha will I be on? But seriously, Torvalds is wrong on this point. It has nothing to do with the semantics points RMS inexplicably likes but Torvalds' political opinions are too Wernher von Braun. Sure, it's good to have those sort of people around but don't actually listen to them on anything in the real world.
How is Torvalds not more practical than RMS? Pragmatism as a philosophy tends to become less pragmatic in the long run. Look at what happened with the "best tool for the job" BitKeeper. I wonder why Linus isn't using that "best tool for the job" anymore? Oh, that's right, he can't! And why can't he? Oh, I dunno, for the exact reasons RMS had been predicting for years, perhaps? In any case, go read some of LBT's postings and tell me that he's not worse than RMS in the neuroticism department.
The GPLv3 does not contain any restrictions that are not merely loophole-closings of the "restrictions" on GPLv2. The GPLv3 does not contain any restrictions that are not merely loophole-closings of the "restrictions" on GPLv2. The GPLv3 does not contain any restrictions that are not merely loophole-closings of the "restrictions" on GPLv2. The GPLv3 does not contain any restrictions that are not merely loophole-closings of the "restrictions" on GPLv2. The GPLv3 does not contain any restrictions that are not merely loophole-closings of the "restrictions" on GPLv2. The GPLv3 does not contain any restrictions that are not merely loophole-closings of the "restrictions" on GPLv2. The GPLv3 does not contain any restrictions that are not merely loophole-closings of the "restrictions" on GPLv2. The GPLv3 does not contain any restrictions that are not merely loophole-closings of the "restrictions" on GPLv2.
The problem with the GPL3 (IMHO) is that it does exactly the same thing all the EULAs and conditional licenses of people like Microsoft employ. No it hasn't. The restrictions on the GPL3 are only on distributors just as they've always been.
Re:Back when people could actually code..
on
DOS 5 Upgrade Video
·
· Score: 1
I wish for the alternate universe where microkernels and capability systems won.
Wow... I just thought of something- if Steve Jobs and Lunis Torballs got in a fight, who's side would Shatslot take? The dumbasses, like you, would all take Steve Ballmer's side.
With the former, the uncertainty is a government tool. With the latter, the only way to be politically correct is to not be politically correct. That's worse than political correctness. That's actual correctness.
The class action lawsuit money cap is the worst of both worlds. It prevents class-action lawsuits from actually having an effect on the corporations but allows the leeches to get sufficient money for what they need.
Actually the idea was old when it was adopted by a chap named Romulus, sevenfiftythree years before the arbitrary cutoffpoint six years after Jesus was born.
1) Correlation does not imply causation. Correlation does not imply causation. Correlation does not imply causation. Correlation does not imply causation. Correlation does not imply causation. Correlation does not imply causation. Correlation does not imply causation. Correlation does not imply causation.CORRELATION DOES NOT IMPLY CAUSATION!
2) A.4 correlation isn't that big. It's big enough to imply further study, but not big enough to make inferences from directly. It means that sixteen percent(you square it) of the change in income is related to IQ.
Are you seriously comparing the Iraq war, a war of aggression(Iraq hasn't invaded anybody since we left) with the prelude to WWII(Hitler was invading left and right) and the American Revolution(after decades of salutary neglect the British sent in a bunch of Redcoats)? If that's not ignorance I don't know what is.
Can I see a specific problem with the actual methodology of the study? As in, selection bias, correlation!=causation, etc... or are you the one making conclusions before you know the facts?
Slashdot Mirror
Except that, you know, the only restrictions in v3 are closing loopholes in restrictions that already existed in v2.
It's mostly just people who like the GNU software base but don't understand what freedom actually means.
Depends. Which side of the mecha will I be on? But seriously, Torvalds is wrong on this point. It has nothing to do with the semantics points RMS inexplicably likes but Torvalds' political opinions are too Wernher von Braun. Sure, it's good to have those sort of people around but don't actually listen to them on anything in the real world.
The GPLv3 does not contain any restrictions that are not merely loophole-closings of the "restrictions" on GPLv2. The GPLv3 does not contain any restrictions that are not merely loophole-closings of the "restrictions" on GPLv2. The GPLv3 does not contain any restrictions that are not merely loophole-closings of the "restrictions" on GPLv2. The GPLv3 does not contain any restrictions that are not merely loophole-closings of the "restrictions" on GPLv2. The GPLv3 does not contain any restrictions that are not merely loophole-closings of the "restrictions" on GPLv2. The GPLv3 does not contain any restrictions that are not merely loophole-closings of the "restrictions" on GPLv2. The GPLv3 does not contain any restrictions that are not merely loophole-closings of the "restrictions" on GPLv2. The GPLv3 does not contain any restrictions that are not merely loophole-closings of the "restrictions" on GPLv2.
And this is why most people pretend the GFDL doesn't exist. ;)
I wish for the alternate universe where microkernels and capability systems won.
Dude, World War Six sucked.
Don't include me here, I run on nuclear.
With the former, the uncertainty is a government tool. With the latter, the only way to be politically correct is to not be politically correct. That's worse than political correctness. That's actual correctness.
The class action lawsuit money cap is the worst of both worlds. It prevents class-action lawsuits from actually having an effect on the corporations but allows the leeches to get sufficient money for what they need.
Because it's an easy scapegoat.
Actually the idea was old when it was adopted by a chap named Romulus, sevenfiftythree years before the arbitrary cutoffpoint six years after Jesus was born.
Thank you for actually pointing out a flaw in the study. Everyone else calling the study biased seems to be unable to actually say why.
1) Correlation does not imply causation. Correlation does not imply causation. Correlation does not imply causation. Correlation does not imply causation. Correlation does not imply causation. Correlation does not imply causation. Correlation does not imply causation. Correlation does not imply causation. CORRELATION DOES NOT IMPLY CAUSATION! .4 correlation isn't that big. It's big enough to imply further study, but not big enough to make inferences from directly. It means that sixteen percent(you square it) of the change in income is related to IQ.
2) A
Except that liberals don't become conservative as they age. The only life action known to increase conservatism is having kids.
He also discovered Lisp by accident.
Are you seriously comparing the Iraq war, a war of aggression(Iraq hasn't invaded anybody since we left) with the prelude to WWII(Hitler was invading left and right) and the American Revolution(after decades of salutary neglect the British sent in a bunch of Redcoats)? If that's not ignorance I don't know what is.
There's one more problem: The traffic is a demon spawn from hell.
Teddy Roosevelt did but he wasn't a very conservative Republican.
Can I see a specific problem with the actual methodology of the study? As in, selection bias, correlation!=causation, etc... or are you the one making conclusions before you know the facts?