I was thinking the same thing. Maybe the real measurement here is that when you feel shitty you're not gonna be as happy even if you're on a painkiller.
Unless mechanics prevent them by some hard method any sufficiently analyzable game will inevitably result in nothing but draws between two sufficiently skilled players. There will be variation on an individual level of course, nobody plays at the top of their game all the time, but as a whole the larger trend will be towards universal stalemates. Only games where mechanics do not permit stalemates by optimal play will avoid this.
And maybe a world class neurosurgeon is a terrible surgeon because he secrets death causing enzymes from his earlobes. I can make up excuses to justify things too.
You are basically a liar at this point. You know very well that I'm referring to your original claim about PopeRatzo, because I've told you. You keep on pretending that it's a different claim and trying to prove that. In other words you are trying to deceive me about your orginal claim
You, PopeRatzo, and Animojo at the grustrag three of social justice here in slashdot. All three of you blatantly cheerlead for what passes for feminism these days. You don't get to wave a warbanner and then say "oh but not when it's inconvenient!".
And I note that you STILL haven't provided evidence. You do know that the burden of providing evidence is on the person making the claim right? Simply saying "there is evidence go and find it" makes you look like a fool.
I'm not saying "it's out there go and find it" I'm literally saying "It's right fucking here". Do you want it in MLA? APA? Chicago? Turabian? Because at this point what you're doing is literally the equivalent of looking at a works cited page and saying there's no evidence provided. I can give you a citation, it's on you to actually GO TO IT.
This must be what it feels like being in the twilight zone. It's right there Serviscope. I'm not making bald claims. I'm pointing at the evidence and saying it's right there, just go to the goddamn website and look at it.
So what you're saying is you have a full citation, you know exactly where the data is, but because of your own arbitrary reasons (javascript and whatever else you come up with next) you refuse to follow through on your side of this and actually look at the data.
I can give you a citation, I can't make you actually look at it.
It's remarkable. You make claims and refuse to back them up. When challenged you insist that I ought to do the leg work to verify different but related claims. You're still deathly silent on providing evidnece for your original claims. You may well remember that you were making accusations about PopeRatzo.
My god man you're like a work of performance art. I literally just told you how right out in the open this is. It's almost mainstream freaking news online, it's right there. This is like you refusing to believe the sky is blue and demanding I provide evidence while I keep shouting "Look out the goddamn window it's RIGHT THERE".
Except you can google "gawker sex tape" and hulk hogan's sex tape, and their refusal to take it down even when sued, is literally in the first page of results. Likewise finding HuffPo mocking Greg Oden's penis is trivially easy.
There's an irony in you talking about conspiracy theories though given you subscribe to an ideology almost wholly defined by its conspiracy theories of unprecedented size and scope.
Jezebel openly mocks rape and domestic violence victims and even brags about committing domestic abuse against men, encouraging its readers to commit abuse and violence. Yeah I'm going to call that a website operated by and pandering to the SJW crowd.
Nope. It's a logical fallacy if I dismiss the validity of your argument solely on grounds of you being a western style feminist. It's not a logical fallacy if I point out that these two women have condemned people with your exact pattern of behavior and ideology in strong terms.
Well... actually... that's not entirely true. People give a shit. If they didn't they wouldn't go out of their way to minimize or erase male suicide and male victims of revenge porn.
Right on time. It's like a reflex, you can't NOT go out of your way to minimize, dismiss, and erase the tens of thousands of male deaths in favor of a wildly overinflated claim of female "attempts".
The irony is it's astoundingly misogynist of you to do this. You're saying that women are so amazingly feckless and incompetent that they can attempt suicide more than men and yet wind up being something like a single digit percent of actual suicides.
Not only does it smack of "me first!" attention whoring, it's demeaning to women.
A quick Google for Gawker doing this turned up nothing, do you have more specific details?
A quick google for "gawker sex tapes" brings up Hulk Hogan's sex tapes in literally the first five or so results. Good to see you're as "honest" as ever.
I suspect that the actual majority of rapes are comitted by men. And probably the majority of the victims are women... I find it quite difficult to accept your assertion that "If you look at the actual data itself the number of men made-to-penetrate and the number of women penetrated in each year of data released so far has been virtually equal." and would like to know what data this asserion is based on. Do you have a citation?...
I literally cited the exact name of my source right there in my post, which is only a few sentences long.
They both work for the AEI, they both condemn western feminists like you in the strongest terms, they both focus on actual facts and helping women that are actually oppressed... every thing you poopoo Hoff-Sommers for applies just as much to Hirsi Ali.
Gawker and Huffpo both proudly display their leaked male nudes and sex tapes, and PopeRatzo is openly a huge fan of Jezebel and other SJW operated or leaning websites.
Meanwhile PopeRatzo still frequents and supports websites that loudly and proudly display revenge porn and leaked nudes, even going so far as to openly mock the victims and invite further derision be heaped upon them for their genitals, provided those victims are men.
Hypocritical? Maybe. But it's an easy leap for someone who already claims to support equality yet rallies behind domestic abusers, pedophiles, neonazis, and rapists.
You just made the grandparent's point entirely by accident. The overwhelming majority of rape victims are women because the definition of rape does not count men raped by women as rape victims. Per Koss men are not raped by women because they "choose to engage in unwanted sexual intercourse". This is why the federal government counts men raped by women as "other" and not "rape" victims in the National Intimate partner and Sexual Violence Survey. This is a textbook example of the fallacy of equivocation. "Rape" as reported statistically has a very narrow and specially tailored meaning. "Rape" as people understand it means something else entirely.
If you look at the actual data itself the number of men made-to-penetrate and the number of women penetrated in each year of data released so far has been virtually equal. The only difference is men are categorized as "other" and women as "rape" victims.
That's the EXACT brand of bullshit that denies women commit half of all domestic violence (incl. severe violence) against men because men "have power" or similar nonsense explanations.
Men being a majority of managers has fuck all to do with whether or not they're sexually harassed or need legal protections from exactly that, just like men being bigger than women on average has fuck all to do with whether or not they're abused or raped by women.
While they're at it they should google "Ayaan Hirsi Ali" and "Karen DeCrow" to see who else western feminists like you have ostracized for not being hateful and bigoted enough. After all we can't have a black victim of child marriage and genital mutilation who advocates for women's rights in countries where they're *actually* oppressed even after her partners were beheaded in the street and had death threats to her impaled in their corpses making you all look bad. Clearly she deserved to be completely ostracized and demonized to the point of being blacklisted by universities and having honorary degrees revoked.
Yeah... you're really doing a good job showing us just how evil women like Hirsi Ali and Hoff-Sommers are while you yourself rally behind domestic abusers, rapists, pedophiles, and neonazis.
An isolated case is exactly what it is considering that somewhere north of 90% of suicide victims are male, and it's the second leading non-accidental cause of death for boys starting at age ten. the difference is nobody gives a shit about them. Nobody gives a shit that there is a website up RIGHT NOW on oh so feminist HuffPo mocking a man's penis and inviting people to share in mocking his leaked nude pictures further. Nobody gives a shit that Jezebel's parent company spreads men's leaked sex tapes and brags about fighting legal efforts to stop them.
Well... actually... that's not entirely true. People give a shit. If they didn't they wouldn't go out of their way to minimize or erase male suicide and male victims of revenge porn.
This is because problems in the real world (and especially in real time) are arbitrarily complex (and corresponding solutions are approximate) and not amenable to the clean set of prerequisites necessary to "solve" them using mathematical techniques.
In other words we don't get to work with perfectly spherical cows.
Slashdot Mirror
I was thinking the same thing. Maybe the real measurement here is that when you feel shitty you're not gonna be as happy even if you're on a painkiller.
Unless mechanics prevent them by some hard method any sufficiently analyzable game will inevitably result in nothing but draws between two sufficiently skilled players. There will be variation on an individual level of course, nobody plays at the top of their game all the time, but as a whole the larger trend will be towards universal stalemates. Only games where mechanics do not permit stalemates by optimal play will avoid this.
God dammit... alright I'll give you credit for actually getting me with that one you motherfucker...
Yeah about that: There is no gender gap in tech salaries
it makes as much sense as assuming tall people will be bad shoe salesmen because theyre too far from the ground.
http://content.time.com/time/b...
http://online.wsj.com/news/art...
http://www.consad.com/content/...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...
http://www.thedailybeast.com/a...
http://www.slate.com/articles/...
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/th...
http://www.aei-ideas.org/2014/...
And maybe a world class neurosurgeon is a terrible surgeon because he secrets death causing enzymes from his earlobes. I can make up excuses to justify things too.
You are basically a liar at this point. You know very well that I'm referring to your original claim about PopeRatzo, because I've told you. You keep on pretending that it's a different claim and trying to prove that. In other words you are trying to deceive me about your orginal claim
You, PopeRatzo, and Animojo at the grustrag three of social justice here in slashdot. All three of you blatantly cheerlead for what passes for feminism these days. You don't get to wave a warbanner and then say "oh but not when it's inconvenient!".
And I note that you STILL haven't provided evidence. You do know that the burden of providing evidence is on the person making the claim right? Simply saying "there is evidence go and find it" makes you look like a fool.
I'm not saying "it's out there go and find it" I'm literally saying "It's right fucking here". Do you want it in MLA? APA? Chicago? Turabian? Because at this point what you're doing is literally the equivalent of looking at a works cited page and saying there's no evidence provided. I can give you a citation, it's on you to actually GO TO IT.
This must be what it feels like being in the twilight zone. It's right there Serviscope. I'm not making bald claims. I'm pointing at the evidence and saying it's right there, just go to the goddamn website and look at it.
So what you're saying is you have a full citation, you know exactly where the data is, but because of your own arbitrary reasons (javascript and whatever else you come up with next) you refuse to follow through on your side of this and actually look at the data.
I can give you a citation, I can't make you actually look at it.
It's remarkable. You make claims and refuse to back them up. When challenged you insist that I ought to do the leg work to verify different but related claims. You're still deathly silent on providing evidnece for your original claims. You may well remember that you were making accusations about PopeRatzo.
My god man you're like a work of performance art. I literally just told you how right out in the open this is. It's almost mainstream freaking news online, it's right there. This is like you refusing to believe the sky is blue and demanding I provide evidence while I keep shouting "Look out the goddamn window it's RIGHT THERE".
Except you can google "gawker sex tape" and hulk hogan's sex tape, and their refusal to take it down even when sued, is literally in the first page of results. Likewise finding HuffPo mocking Greg Oden's penis is trivially easy.
There's an irony in you talking about conspiracy theories though given you subscribe to an ideology almost wholly defined by its conspiracy theories of unprecedented size and scope.
Jezebel openly mocks rape and domestic violence victims and even brags about committing domestic abuse against men, encouraging its readers to commit abuse and violence. Yeah I'm going to call that a website operated by and pandering to the SJW crowd.
Nope. It's a logical fallacy if I dismiss the validity of your argument solely on grounds of you being a western style feminist. It's not a logical fallacy if I point out that these two women have condemned people with your exact pattern of behavior and ideology in strong terms.
Well... actually... that's not entirely true. People give a shit. If they didn't they wouldn't go out of their way to minimize or erase male suicide and male victims of revenge porn.
Right on time. It's like a reflex, you can't NOT go out of your way to minimize, dismiss, and erase the tens of thousands of male deaths in favor of a wildly overinflated claim of female "attempts".
The irony is it's astoundingly misogynist of you to do this. You're saying that women are so amazingly feckless and incompetent that they can attempt suicide more than men and yet wind up being something like a single digit percent of actual suicides.
Not only does it smack of "me first!" attention whoring, it's demeaning to women.
A quick Google for Gawker doing this turned up nothing, do you have more specific details?
A quick google for "gawker sex tapes" brings up Hulk Hogan's sex tapes in literally the first five or so results. Good to see you're as "honest" as ever.
I suspect that the actual majority of rapes are comitted by men. And probably the majority of the victims are women... I find it quite difficult to accept your assertion that "If you look at the actual data itself the number of men made-to-penetrate and the number of women penetrated in each year of data released so far has been virtually equal." and would like to know what data this asserion is based on. Do you have a citation?...
I literally cited the exact name of my source right there in my post, which is only a few sentences long.
They both work for the AEI, they both condemn western feminists like you in the strongest terms, they both focus on actual facts and helping women that are actually oppressed... every thing you poopoo Hoff-Sommers for applies just as much to Hirsi Ali.
Gawker and Huffpo both proudly display their leaked male nudes and sex tapes, and PopeRatzo is openly a huge fan of Jezebel and other SJW operated or leaning websites.
The Left has been acting like the Right, but with a different flavor to their censorious authoritarian moralism.
Meanwhile PopeRatzo still frequents and supports websites that loudly and proudly display revenge porn and leaked nudes, even going so far as to openly mock the victims and invite further derision be heaped upon them for their genitals, provided those victims are men.
Hypocritical? Maybe. But it's an easy leap for someone who already claims to support equality yet rallies behind domestic abusers, pedophiles, neonazis, and rapists.
You just made the grandparent's point entirely by accident. The overwhelming majority of rape victims are women because the definition of rape does not count men raped by women as rape victims. Per Koss men are not raped by women because they "choose to engage in unwanted sexual intercourse". This is why the federal government counts men raped by women as "other" and not "rape" victims in the National Intimate partner and Sexual Violence Survey. This is a textbook example of the fallacy of equivocation. "Rape" as reported statistically has a very narrow and specially tailored meaning. "Rape" as people understand it means something else entirely.
If you look at the actual data itself the number of men made-to-penetrate and the number of women penetrated in each year of data released so far has been virtually equal. The only difference is men are categorized as "other" and women as "rape" victims.
That's the EXACT brand of bullshit that denies women commit half of all domestic violence (incl. severe violence) against men because men "have power" or similar nonsense explanations.
Men being a majority of managers has fuck all to do with whether or not they're sexually harassed or need legal protections from exactly that, just like men being bigger than women on average has fuck all to do with whether or not they're abused or raped by women.
While they're at it they should google "Ayaan Hirsi Ali" and "Karen DeCrow" to see who else western feminists like you have ostracized for not being hateful and bigoted enough. After all we can't have a black victim of child marriage and genital mutilation who advocates for women's rights in countries where they're *actually* oppressed even after her partners were beheaded in the street and had death threats to her impaled in their corpses making you all look bad. Clearly she deserved to be completely ostracized and demonized to the point of being blacklisted by universities and having honorary degrees revoked.
Yeah... you're really doing a good job showing us just how evil women like Hirsi Ali and Hoff-Sommers are while you yourself rally behind domestic abusers, rapists, pedophiles, and neonazis.
An isolated case is exactly what it is considering that somewhere north of 90% of suicide victims are male, and it's the second leading non-accidental cause of death for boys starting at age ten. the difference is nobody gives a shit about them. Nobody gives a shit that there is a website up RIGHT NOW on oh so feminist HuffPo mocking a man's penis and inviting people to share in mocking his leaked nude pictures further. Nobody gives a shit that Jezebel's parent company spreads men's leaked sex tapes and brags about fighting legal efforts to stop them.
Well... actually... that's not entirely true. People give a shit. If they didn't they wouldn't go out of their way to minimize or erase male suicide and male victims of revenge porn.
This is because problems in the real world (and especially in real time) are arbitrarily complex (and corresponding solutions are approximate) and not amenable to the clean set of prerequisites necessary to "solve" them using mathematical techniques.
In other words we don't get to work with perfectly spherical cows.