First of all a date is not described by a PIC(6) declaration. Secondly changing every 6-digit date in software to an 8-digit date is the most braindead and by far the most expensive approach.
Why you consider yourself an expert and look down on me is beyond me. Good luck with your attitude.
Hope you nevver have to fix a Y2K related problem, as you clearly have no clue about it.
Perhaps you should read the summary or the article? Why would anyone who is face blind see a grey blur instead of a face? Why would he not see random things as grey blurs?
Just having access to the ATM might not be enough to get money out of it. In Germany, the ATM often is in the front floor, the money is in the basement. Without credentials or exploiting a software bug most maintenance guys have no access to the money... So, like in this scenario, they try to get malware installed on the machine.
Think about an artificial neural network. Each time you add a layer you improve the quality of the output, all other things held constant. Plain wrong. NNs don't work that way. And for most problems there is an 'optimal' amount of layers/neurons... increasing the amount of neurons or layers change nothing.
You can thank the Extreme Programming Gurus (now known as "Agile") for this. And in what programming language did those guys work at that time? Hm?
The system that I work on now is an API, so unit testing it is necessary. Agreed.
For internal APIs, the main job of unit testing is to make refactoring sufficiently expensive that it will never happen. You could "black box testing" only the APl and only have further unit tests for essential stuff.
Actually I could return the insult... You mean something different with you rant about gravity, but you don't grasp it and can't articulate it... It is kind of fun of watching your struggles in your wrongness... hahaha.
Hint: yes, there is a gradient of 'gravity field force' between your head and and your feet if you are standing upright or floating upright in water. How ever the 'force field' has quite different effects, if either standing on ground or floating in water. Considering that your body is 80% water, most effects simply vanish when you are buoyance.
Just open a physics book and calculate it... it is not that hard, I learned it in 8th or 9th grade... to long ago to remember.
The easy answer is yes. I yesterday had a mandatory 'internet security' training. The trainer is a 'high guy' in the security department/IT department. He claimed, a 'reply-to' tag/field is added to an received email when 'the mail server' recognizes that the real adress from where the email came is not the same as in the 'from field'. And then again, if 'from' and 'reply-to' does not match, the mail is flagged as spam or suspicious.
People moved from assembly mainly to dynamic typed languages like LISP and Smalltalk. Calling dynamic typed retarded only shows how new you are to programming and how less you have grasped so far.
E.g. write a DSL in a dynamic typed language and then the same in a statical typed one. Have fun:)
You should not judge about languages you are not fluent in. COBOL e.g. is an excellent language for business programming. JS is a very fine language, too. The only problem is type coercion with 'primitive' types to strings and similars things. People writing their hate here sinply mix up JS with how it is integrated into browsers... and that again is mainly M$s fault.
That is why the dynamic language ccrowd 'invented' (rediscovered, cough cough) unit tests and test driven development. To bad they throw it on the staticc typed language crowed now as if we never had heared about compilers.
(For those who wonder: I only write integration tests and 'system tests' on the level of use cases, scenarios or stories. For real software, that means deployed applications, not 'libraries', ordinary 'unit tests' are in 90% of all cases complete pointless and a waste of time - in a compiled, strong typed language, that is)
How the funk should TCL not be turing complete? Do you actually know what the term 'turing ccomplete' means? A funing turing machine, pun intended, is turing ccomplete. How should a full fledged programming language not be turing complete?
Slashdot Mirror
First of all a date is not described by a PIC(6) declaration.
Secondly changing every 6-digit date in software to an 8-digit date is the most braindead and by far the most expensive approach.
Why you consider yourself an expert and look down on me is beyond me.
Good luck with your attitude.
Hope you nevver have to fix a Y2K related problem, as you clearly have no clue about it.
Perhaps you should read the summary or the article?
Why would anyone who is face blind see a grey blur instead of a face?
Why would he not see random things as grey blurs?
Just having access to the ATM might not be enough to get money out of it. ...
In Germany, the ATM often is in the front floor, the money is in the basement. Without credentials or exploiting a software bug most maintenance guys have no access to the money
So, like in this scenario, they try to get malware installed on the machine.
That is a statement, or even an axiom, but not a prove. ...
Now go and remove his brain
How long do we wait for his posts to conclude he will never ever post again?
Think about an artificial neural network. Each time you add a layer you improve the quality of the output, all other things held constant. ... increasing the amount of neurons or layers change nothing.
Plain wrong.
NNs don't work that way. And for most problems there is an 'optimal' amount of layers/neurons
Anyone who was going to visit the U.S. but decided against it because Trump was elected is a complete moron. ...
Or he is just voting with his wallet
Evveryone I know thinks the same.
Lets see if it evver gets disclosed.
A CAN bus is a serial bus used in cars.
You could have googled that.
If you need 'security' you have to harden the devices connected to it, not the bus.
Both are dynamic typed, so what is your point?
Oops, of course I meant strong _static_ typing.
You can thank the Extreme Programming Gurus (now known as "Agile") for this.
And in what programming language did those guys work at that time? Hm?
The system that I work on now is an API, so unit testing it is necessary.
Agreed.
For internal APIs, the main job of unit testing is to make refactoring sufficiently expensive that it will never happen.
You could "black box testing" only the APl and only have further unit tests for essential stuff.
Are we talking about this TCL: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik... ?
It is actually only Parisian waiters :)
Actually I could return the insult ... ... ... hahaha.
You mean something different with you rant about gravity, but you don't grasp it and can't articulate it
It is kind of fun of watching your struggles in your wrongness
Hint: yes, there is a gradient of 'gravity field force' between your head and and your feet if you are standing upright or floating upright in water. How ever the 'force field' has quite different effects, if either standing on ground or floating in water. Considering that your body is 80% water, most effects simply vanish when you are buoyance.
Just open a physics book and calculate it ... it is not that hard, I learned it in 8th or 9th grade ... to long ago to remember.
I used COBOL, did about 1MLOC Y2k reengineering.
I use JavaScriot regularily as scripting language, but not as a web language in a browser.
Next try?
The easy answer is yes.
I yesterday had a mandatory 'internet security' training.
The trainer is a 'high guy' in the security department/IT department.
He claimed, a 'reply-to' tag/field is added to an received email when 'the mail server' recognizes that the real adress from where the email came is not the same as in the 'from field'.
And then again, if 'from' and 'reply-to' does not match, the mail is flagged as spam or suspicious.
What did you dislike about COBOL? :) I only use it to script other apps, hu hom, like debuggers,
I don't develop in JS
Security is not relevant for a CAN bus.
And: TCP/IP has no 'security' build in either, that would be on much higher levels.
People moved from assembly mainly to dynamic typed languages like LISP and Smalltalk.
Calling dynamic typed retarded only shows how new you are to programming and how less you have grasped so far.
E.g. write a DSL in a dynamic typed language and then the same in a statical typed one. Have fun :)
That is why in my world the management usually does not decide about languages. ...
The developers do
You should not judge about languages you are not fluent in. ... and that again is mainly M$s fault.
COBOL e.g. is an excellent language for business programming.
JS is a very fine language, too. The only problem is type coercion with 'primitive' types to strings and similars things.
People writing their hate here sinply mix up JS with how it is integrated into browsers
That is why the dynamic language ccrowd 'invented' (rediscovered, cough cough) unit tests and test driven development.
To bad they throw it on the staticc typed language crowed now as if we never had heared about compilers.
(For those who wonder: I only write integration tests and 'system tests' on the level of use cases, scenarios or stories. For real software, that means deployed applications, not 'libraries', ordinary 'unit tests' are in 90% of all cases complete pointless and a waste of time - in a compiled, strong typed language, that is)
How the funk should TCL not be turing complete?
Do you actually know what the term 'turing ccomplete' means?
A funing turing machine, pun intended, is turing ccomplete.
How should a full fledged programming language not be turing complete?
He invented it, you insensitive clot!
The word 'backed' does not mean 'you can pay taxes with it'.