WTF, are you an idiot? A house hold is a family of 3, average of all households in Germany, or 2.5. And a households CO2 production is what they use for cooking and heating, moron.
Sorry, it would have been easier to explain how he came to that idiotic numbers. Why should I ask why a box of beans is heavier than one bean? I don't get your analogon, it has nothing to do with the original post.
Heisenberg and Schroedinger are driving in a car, Schroedinger is driving. On the highway they get stopped by a cop, he tells them: "The speed limit is 65, you are 5 above it!" Heisenberg freaks out: "now we are lost!" While the physicists argue the cop opens the trunk and then asks: "Why do you have a dead cat in your trunk?" Schroedinger shouts: "Oh noes! Now he has killed the cat, too!"
That does not change the problem of a "exploding" reactor at the slightest. It only might change the likelihood. The power plant in Tihange e.g. would pollute everything to the east, north east, south east under typical wind conditions. Probably affecting 20 million people in a single day and spreading farer to the east another 20 million over the next days, no idea how far Poland etc. would be affected.
Your less than 1% number is unfortunately idiotic, and obviously wrong. But I don't care to search for real numbers. It does not produce Plutonium if that is the point you want to make.
Also there are newer reactor types, mostly deployed in Canada, that basically run on natural Uranium.
The average income is irrelevant, as it is related to the cost of living. Purchasing Parity is unfortunately often not correct, so no idea how it is in this case:D
Well, the gap in the German experimental convoys is 20cm... often less. But I guess the convoy length will be restricted to relatively low number. After all if the front car "crashes" it is likely that the following cars crash into the front car.
the only viable place to mount solar panels would be on the roof of the cab No, the sides work equally well. However I doubt the area is big enough to give a reasonable increase in range.
Every grid has pumped storages, never heard about country that has none. Otherwise you would need resistors to burn off excess electricity. You know: what you feed in has to be consumed. If you produce to much (and you always do that as most plants can only adjusted in steps of several dozen MWs) you have to you have to place the excess somewhere, and that is usually done with pumped storage as that is the most efficient, and has quick reaction times.
We do know what a pound, is:D In Germany a pound is 500g, half a kilo. And the foreigners have smaller pounds than we have, around 420g... I guess they are not as strong build as we are;D
Wow, your tech jobs are outsorced to Insia. And you think: they have no education, universities, electricity... and more shocking is you think they have more than a billion inhabitants.
Why? Unmanned containers moved through a hyperloop sounds like a nice improvement over pneumatic tubes. Why driving parcels with trucks when you have a hyperloop? Thinking about alibaba prime...
There are plenty of other options for plant life with equivalents to chlorophyll: https://www.livescience.com/13... Also we usually can only detect light spectrums of the atmosphere, not of the flora on ground.
A whole lot of hearsay from some guys who said they saw a guy walk on water 2000 years ago? That is a mistranslation from aramaic via greek into latin. "Walking on the water" is an aramaic idiom for "strolling at the beach".
If something exists, then I think it is reasonable to say there is a way to prove that it exists. No, there is no such way. The only objective proof would be to find it and show it to others.
You can search for ever and never find the thing you want to prove to be existing. However, not finding it does not make a proof that it does not exist.
Slashdot Mirror
In the US ...
WTF, are you an idiot?
A house hold is a family of 3, average of all households in Germany, or 2.5.
And a households CO2 production is what they use for cooking and heating, moron.
Sorry, it would have been easier to explain how he came to that idiotic numbers.
Why should I ask why a box of beans is heavier than one bean? I don't get your analogon, it has nothing to do with the original post.
Heisenberg and Schroedinger are driving in a car, Schroedinger is driving.
On the highway they get stopped by a cop, he tells them: "The speed limit is 65, you are 5 above it!"
Heisenberg freaks out: "now we are lost!"
While the physicists argue the cop opens the trunk and then asks: "Why do you have a dead cat in your trunk?"
Schroedinger shouts: "Oh noes! Now he has killed the cat, too!"
I posted the facts often enough here ...
That does not change the problem of a "exploding" reactor at the slightest.
It only might change the likelihood.
The power plant in Tihange e.g. would pollute everything to the east, north east, south east under typical wind conditions. Probably affecting 20 million people in a single day and spreading farer to the east another 20 million over the next days, no idea how far Poland etc. would be affected.
On twitter likely not, so why do you ask?
Your less than 1% number is unfortunately idiotic, and obviously wrong. But I don't care to search for real numbers.
It does not produce Plutonium if that is the point you want to make.
Also there are newer reactor types, mostly deployed in Canada, that basically run on natural Uranium.
I did not claim any bad things ... you did.
You claimed that all "communists" committed crimes.
Oh, last time I checked they had 880millions.
The other facts we did not discuss.
The average income is irrelevant, as it is related to the cost of living. Purchasing Parity is unfortunately often not correct, so no idea how it is in this case :D
Well, the gap in the German experimental convoys is 20cm ... often less.
But I guess the convoy length will be restricted to relatively low number.
After all if the front car "crashes" it is likely that the following cars crash into the front car.
the only viable place to mount solar panels would be on the roof of the cab
No, the sides work equally well.
However I doubt the area is big enough to give a reasonable increase in range.
Na, to complicated. You just put 3 or 4 times the batteries into the car. Problem solved.
There wont likely be more than 5 trucks in a convoy. That is already a 50 yard long "vehicle".
Every grid has pumped storages, never heard about country that has none.
Otherwise you would need resistors to burn off excess electricity. You know: what you feed in has to be consumed. If you produce to much (and you always do that as most plants can only adjusted in steps of several dozen MWs) you have to you have to place the excess somewhere, and that is usually done with pumped storage as that is the most efficient, and has quick reaction times.
We do know what a pound, is :D In Germany a pound is 500g, half a kilo. And the foreigners have smaller pounds than we have, around 420g ... I guess they are not as strong build as we are ;D
Wow, your tech jobs are outsorced to Insia. ... and more shocking is you think they have more than a billion inhabitants.
And you think: they have no education, universities, electricity
Nince anecdote, though.
Why? Unmanned containers moved through a hyperloop sounds like a nice improvement over pneumatic tubes. ...
Why driving parcels with trucks when you have a hyperloop? Thinking about alibaba prime
There are plenty of other options for plant life with equivalents to chlorophyll: https://www.livescience.com/13...
Also we usually can only detect light spectrums of the atmosphere, not of the flora on ground.
In my country a driving license is worth nothing. ...
You can not cross a border, open a bank account or what ever
It is a driving license ... not a passport.
I guess you wanted to be funny.
But there is no difference in facism wether you are a far left or far right, communist or nazi.
Only if you are a WASP ...
Most communists involved in crimes are already dead.
So what is the point?
Want to ban all white americans because they killed most of the native americans 300 - 200 years ago?
A whole lot of hearsay from some guys who said they saw a guy walk on water 2000 years ago?
That is a mistranslation from aramaic via greek into latin. "Walking on the water" is an aramaic idiom for "strolling at the beach".
If something exists, then I think it is reasonable to say there is a way to prove that it exists.
No, there is no such way.
The only objective proof would be to find it and show it to others.
You can search for ever and never find the thing you want to prove to be existing. However, not finding it does not make a proof that it does not exist.