climate models tend to replace "basic physics" with empirical short-term relations between carbon concentrations Which modle are you referring to? Ah the one that is haunting you in your sleep?
and assume unbounded exponential growth of carbon emissions Why would a climate model assume growth of carbon emissions? What has that to do with modeling climate? Oh, nothing... idiot.
And that heat trapping effect, the greenhouse effect, is nearly saturated already It is not, otherwise the temperature would already be on the level the article points out... Idiot.
You also have to assume that there are no additional negative feedback loops to counteract the effects And which would that be? Genius?
those feedback loops are not "basic physics", can't be "demonstrated in a laboratory", Of course they are pure physics... perma frost melting, released CH4... warmer oceans, release of methane hydride. Idiot!
Lucky then that climate change causes increased evaporation and probably overall increased precipitation. Show me a cloud that flies 6000 miles over dry land... to put rain in the future deserts.
In theory, in your theory. In practice, you are already wrong with the latitude, 45 degrees is the latitude of NYC or Rome. So you are talking about perhaps somewhere around 60 degrees north and south? I leave it up to your obvious keen and eager seeking for knowledge to figure why there never will be the new corn chambers of the world at those latitudes... padawan.
World wide, 40% to 50% of all food is thrown away. We don't need more food. We need better food and better distribution and less exploitation (e.g. over fishing).
You missed the part of: the temperature was 2 - 3 degrees higher -- I guess that will adjust over the next 100 or os years -- and sea level was 10 - 20 meters higher -- that will adjust sooner or later as well. If you think 10m - 20m higher sea levels are not a apocalypse... well, take your pick.
And all without any laws or government intervention. At you place yes. But do you really believe all this would be the case if EU, most notable Germany, had not introduced such laws 30 years ago?
No, they don't. If you would replace all gasoline/diesel cars with electric one, the carbon footprint would be less than half of them. A bit annoying that people who have no clue whatsoever have voting rights.
In what dream world do you live that you think hunter gatheres have no concept of property? This is my hunting ground. This is my river. This is my oasis. This is my wife. This are my kids. And this: is my spear and my axe to keep what is mine.
If you have 100% code coverage, you have 100% coverage of all "if's" "else's" and "loops", too.
Or how do you think I magically test a line in the middle of an if block without testing the line with the "if"?
I would rather have a suite that actually tests some subset of the code exhaustively than a suite that runs each line once and claims that everything is perfectly tested. What is the point of testing the same line of code multiple times with different tests? Unless: it is an "if" or the "loop condition". Which you obviously test with the corner cases.
The only thing you are right with: if I test an If only for success and not for failure, I have 100% coverage but miss an important case. Similar for loop conditions.
That is actually the biggest mistake I see in modern development. (referring to the linked xkcd cartoon) Instead of having different DB users with rights to change the schema and rights to only query data, they have a single super user that nearly can do everything.
That is correct. You can not simply teach something.
People have to learn by doing the stuff. And there they need feedback or a strong way of self reflection.
The idea that one learns about any software topic by just sitting in a CS course is nonsense. It is more like martial arts. You can read and talk as much as you want about it... the only way to 'learn' it is by practicing it. And that automatically implies: the older the better. That ageism in USA regarding software developers is a strange phenomena to me.
Then you only met sucky ScrumMasters. For the team Scrum should reduce the workload that is not related to programming extremely and not add any overhead. A good ScrumMaster will manage about 4 teams. So no: you don't need a full time ScrumMaster! Besides organization/communication beyond the team, that means upper management, coordinating several teams etc. the job of a Scrum.master is: to implement/teach scrum. And then he makes himself superflouvious and all team related scrum stuff can be done by the team without need of a ScrumMaster.
Slashdot Mirror
climate models tend to replace "basic physics" with empirical short-term relations between carbon concentrations
Which modle are you referring to? Ah the one that is haunting you in your sleep?
and assume unbounded exponential growth of carbon emissions ... idiot.
Why would a climate model assume growth of carbon emissions? What has that to do with modeling climate? Oh, nothing
And that heat trapping effect, the greenhouse effect, is nearly saturated already ... Idiot.
It is not, otherwise the temperature would already be on the level the article points out
You also have to assume that there are no additional negative feedback loops to counteract the effects
And which would that be? Genius?
those feedback loops are not "basic physics", can't be "demonstrated in a laboratory", ... perma frost melting, released CH4 ... warmer oceans, release of methane hydride. Idiot!
Of course they are pure physics
Lucky then that climate change causes increased evaporation and probably overall increased precipitation. ... to put rain in the future deserts.
Show me a cloud that flies 6000 miles over dry land
In theory, in your theory. ... padawan.
In practice, you are already wrong with the latitude, 45 degrees is the latitude of NYC or Rome.
So you are talking about perhaps somewhere around 60 degrees north and south?
I leave it up to your obvious keen and eager seeking for knowledge to figure why there never will be the new corn chambers of the world at those latitudes
World wide, 40% to 50% of all food is thrown away.
We don't need more food. We need better food and better distribution and less exploitation (e.g. over fishing).
The summer winter spread is at least 50C. ... far less than 50C, it used to by about 65C so.
Not in Germany
But, the alarmist want to claim both, with only a 2C increase. ... you seem to like that word. Funny that it is only used in the US it seems.
Alarmists
You missed the part of: the temperature was 2 - 3 degrees higher -- I guess that will adjust over the next 100 or os years -- and sea level was 10 - 20 meters higher -- that will adjust sooner or later as well. ... well, take your pick.
If you think 10m - 20m higher sea levels are not a apocalypse
And all without any laws or government intervention.
At you place yes.
But do you really believe all this would be the case if EU, most notable Germany, had not introduced such laws 30 years ago?
No, they don't.
If you would replace all gasoline/diesel cars with electric one, the carbon footprint would be less than half of them.
A bit annoying that people who have no clue whatsoever have voting rights.
It is not you who saves $500, it is someone else.
That is why renewables are not adopted (yet).
All the death to coal ... if it would be prevented it would save billions, probably trillions.
What local pollution do you have? Except for cars, there is no local pollution in civilized countries anymore.
We all know that zero point enrgy is 'a reality'.
However exploiting it to 'gain power', seems impossible. But perhaps you have an idea?
In what dream world do you live that you think hunter gatheres have no concept of property?
This is my hunting ground.
This is my river.
This is my oasis.
This is my wife.
This are my kids.
And this: is my spear and my axe to keep what is mine.
There is no democratic country in the world where people can "overthrow" the current government.
They can vote for other assholes next election ... perhaps.
Technologies is ot the same as net neutrality.
No idea about your roaming charges ... if you still have them, you should sue in an eu court.
Well,
but this is a browser bug, or isn't it?
I mean, the script code should not be able to access the other server. Or do I miss something?
You make no sense, sorry.
If you have 100% code coverage, you have 100% coverage of all "if's" "else's" and "loops", too.
Or how do you think I magically test a line in the middle of an if block without testing the line with the "if"?
I would rather have a suite that actually tests some subset of the code exhaustively than a suite that runs each line once and claims that everything is perfectly tested.
What is the point of testing the same line of code multiple times with different tests? Unless: it is an "if" or the "loop condition". Which you obviously test with the corner cases.
The only thing you are right with: if I test an If only for success and not for failure, I have 100% coverage but miss an important case. Similar for loop conditions.
Everyone with a few brain cells knows: Portugal is in the EU.
So yes: they have net neutrality, facepalm.
Sulfur dioxide is not a greenhouse gas.
Hydrogen Sulfide is not a greenhouse gas.
It actually has the opposite effect, like most sulfur compounds.
If those terms of use are enforceable ...
That is actually the biggest mistake I see in modern development. (referring to the linked xkcd cartoon)
Instead of having different DB users with rights to change the schema and rights to only query data, they have a single super user that nearly can do everything.
That is correct.
You can not simply teach something.
People have to learn by doing the stuff. And there they need feedback or a strong way of self reflection.
The idea that one learns about any software topic by just sitting in a CS course is nonsense. It is more like martial arts. You can read and talk as much as you want about it ... the only way to 'learn' it is by practicing it. And that automatically implies: the older the better. That ageism in USA regarding software developers is a strange phenomena to me.
Then you only met sucky ScrumMasters.
For the team Scrum should reduce the workload that is not related to programming extremely and not add any overhead.
A good ScrumMaster will manage about 4 teams. So no: you don't need a full time ScrumMaster!
Besides organization/communication beyond the team, that means upper management, coordinating several teams etc. the job of a Scrum.master is: to implement/teach scrum. And then he makes himself superflouvious and all team related scrum stuff can be done by the team without need of a ScrumMaster.