And there always will etablissments where attractive women (or the other sex if you prefer that) serve the drinks, in various states/variations of (un)dressedness.
Thatâ(TM)s what defines any religion: the âoemind setâ of its followers. Only if that mindset has anything to do with the religion, otherwise not. That was my point.
After all, if people die around retirement age, you donâ(TM)t have to pay pensions. But we have to pay for their medication, hospital bills and transplants and probably life long medication. They don't contribute to society, don't consume, don't spent their money on vacations etc.
The daughter of a retired loses a grandpa/grandma who can take care for her kids (hen she is in hoospital or on a trip) etc.
solar, biofuels, hydroelectric, etc., they all have have significant environmental consequences. Hard to quantify... and depending on the region, biofuels e.g. have no real impact on Germany. We are reducing down farmland since decades, some gets converted to biofuel production, a few idiots even place solar panels on perfectly suitable farmland (to get boni from the EU for cutting down farm land)
I gave the latitude frim my mind. So being 4 - 5 degres off is not as bad ad the original poster who was 15-20 degrees off. Latitude 45 is already perfectly farmable. So global warming does nit bring any more farmland at latitude 45. Latitude 60 will always be bad for farmin: to long frost times, after thawing to long muddy, tundra and woods, usually yield back farmland. Edge cases like you example about Fairbanks don't contradict that. Try that in the middle of Siberia... no way you will soon farm grain there. Then on the other hand: you lose the current grain reagions in the USA, and you want to trade that for new grain regions in Canada? You seem to be rather stupid, which your nitpicking about my 4 degrees 'mistake' clearly indicates.
Oh, and most plant growth is mostly restricted by the length of the day, or the total length of the growsing season. The srticle you link especially mentions: water, and the right fertoizer.
So good luck with your 'expansion of the growing zones theory'.
Erm, you are most certainly mixing me up. I am a software engineer, so obviously I know what a mechanical engineer is. I'm german, we are most famous for our mechanical engineering studies in our universities. But when you said Ironman, I dod not think about that movie. As I did not read the those Marvel comics when I was a kid, the movies don't really interest me. Unless I stumble over one by accident on youtube, I never watch stuff like that.
and those elements may be sourced from another origin. Hm, I always assumed that would be against the "same source policy" browsers are supposed to enforce.
Even if it causes warming over some side effects, it is not a green house gas.
Green house gases are gases that absorb the IR light that is reflected from the earth surface.
I'm rather sure though that I've read that it could cause clouds to turn into rain and clear the air...temporary cooling, but longer term warming. This would not be a long term warming, why would it?
What Islam is incompatible with is not democracy, but liberalism, tolerance, and equal rights. Again: that has nothing to do with Islam. But the "mind set" of the people living in such environments.
Some males hate woman, only want to fuck/rape them. That the a good deal of them live in islamic countries is not the fault of Islam. It is the fault of their mothers/fathers that they have no respect for woman. Same for any other issue. (And: 1500 years ago, it was the same in Europe or later America, Christians raped and fucked everything they could. No one in our days would call "Christianity" incompatible with democracy etc. )
I have almost certainly been to more Islamic countries than you ever will. Been more: yes. Ever will be: unlikely. I retire in a year or two...
The oldest windmills are mentioned about 2000BC (yeah, due to political correctness or some other bullshit you don't call it BC in the US but BE... what ever that is supposed to mean)
The house I live in is over 100 years old. So are most houses in my street... just saying. They luckily survived the last bombings in WWII. The center of the city got destroyed, but the "walls" of the houses survived, they got basically rebuild with the material laying around.
In which part of the world do you live that nights are windless? Probably in the center of a desert? Hm, even there it is hard to imagine a windless night.
How long does it take to build a nuclear plant and get it on the grid?
How much wind power or solar power can you build up during that time and connect part by part to the grid?
and are willing to throw out the one scale-able solution that is presently generating the most CO2 emission free electricity In Germany wind and solar generate more power than nuclear. So is it in many countries as plenty of countries have not a single nuclear reactor.
The Venus atmosphere is mainly CO2. The Venus is much closer to the sun.
Of course earth could have a short (in cosmic terms) period of a Venus like hell. Until all water has evaporated. The water will be split at the edge of the atmosphere and hydrogen will bleed away. No ieda how and when it stabelizes.
Anyway, the mechanisms on Earth would be different than those on Venus.
Slashdot Mirror
I believe there always will be bartenders.
And there always will etablissments where attractive women (or the other sex if you prefer that) serve the drinks, in various states/variations of (un)dressedness.
Thatâ(TM)s what defines any religion: the âoemind setâ of its followers.
Only if that mindset has anything to do with the religion, otherwise not.
That was my point.
After all, if people die around retirement age, you donâ(TM)t have to pay pensions.
But we have to pay for their medication, hospital bills and transplants and probably life long medication.
They don't contribute to society, don't consume, don't spent their money on vacations etc.
The daughter of a retired loses a grandpa/grandma who can take care for her kids (hen she is in hoospital or on a trip) etc.
solar, biofuels, hydroelectric, etc., they all have have significant environmental consequences. ... and depending on the region, biofuels e.g. have no real impact on Germany. We are reducing down farmland since decades, some gets converted to biofuel production, a few idiots even place solar panels on perfectly suitable farmland (to get boni from the EU for cutting down farm land)
Hard to quantify
Old news. :) ...
Usually I ignore links without comments.
Should have done that in you csse as well
Call me next time it rains again in that region
I gave the latitude frim my mind. So being 4 - 5 degres off is not as bad ad the original poster who was 15-20 degrees off. ... no way you will soon farm grain there.
Latitude 45 is already perfectly farmable. So global warming does nit bring any more farmland at latitude 45.
Latitude 60 will always be bad for farmin: to long frost times, after thawing to long muddy, tundra and woods, usually yield back farmland. Edge cases like you example about Fairbanks don't contradict that.
Try that in the middle of Siberia
Then on the other hand: you lose the current grain reagions in the USA, and you want to trade that for new grain regions in Canada?
You seem to be rather stupid, which your nitpicking about my 4 degrees 'mistake' clearly indicates.
Oh, and most plant growth is mostly restricted by the length of the day, or the total length of the growsing season. The srticle you link especially mentions: water, and the right fertoizer.
So good luck with your 'expansion of the growing zones theory'.
Erm, you are most certainly mixing me up.
I am a software engineer, so obviously I know what a mechanical engineer is. I'm german, we are most famous for our mechanical engineering studies in our universities.
But when you said Ironman, I dod not think about that movie. As I did not read the those Marvel comics when I was a kid, the movies don't really interest me. Unless I stumble over one by accident on youtube, I never watch stuff like that.
Oh, I should have written: in which part of the world do you live that morons put up windmills in areas that have bad wind conditions ;)
I don't know the video in question.
However you are right in so far as digitizing an out of copyright old work creates a new derived work with new copyright.
I read text ... and answer to text.
Not to the name of the sender.
No idea who Tony Stark/Ironman is ... and no idea why you switch to mechanical engineers.
and those elements may be sourced from another origin.
Hm, I always assumed that would be against the "same source policy" browsers are supposed to enforce.
Even if it causes warming over some side effects, it is not a green house gas.
Green house gases are gases that absorb the IR light that is reflected from the earth surface.
I'm rather sure though that I've read that it could cause clouds to turn into rain and clear the air...temporary cooling, but longer term warming.
This would not be a long term warming, why would it?
I did not say, it destroyed civilization.
The parent said: civilization survived.
Which it did not. Civilization stagnated between 500 and 1500, with various drops in level, for what ever reasons.
I would say, you are super bad in explaining.
No, I don't get it.
The above code you test with
x,y = false, false
x,y = true, false
x,y = false, true
x,y = false, false
What is wrong with that?
Well, :D
I don't sleep with men
What Islam is incompatible with is not democracy, but liberalism, tolerance, and equal rights.
Again: that has nothing to do with Islam. But the "mind set" of the people living in such environments.
Some males hate woman, only want to fuck/rape them. That the a good deal of them live in islamic countries is not the fault of Islam. It is the fault of their mothers/fathers that they have no respect for woman. Same for any other issue. (And: 1500 years ago, it was the same in Europe or later America, Christians raped and fucked everything they could. No one in our days would call "Christianity" incompatible with democracy etc. )
I have almost certainly been to more Islamic countries than you ever will. ...
Been more: yes.
Ever will be: unlikely. I retire in a year or two
I wonder why not land them in a pond and then fish them out of the water.
Perhaps they would not survive the heat stress?
Yeah,
and when you put your stove on maximum, and put a 5l (a bit more than a gallon), obviously the water boils immediately.
Wind is 1990s decade technology ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Young people in our days
The oldest windmills are mentioned about 2000BC (yeah, due to political correctness or some other bullshit you don't call it BC in the US but BE ... what ever that is supposed to mean)
Oh, another idiot that does not know what "base load" actually means: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
(Did I not make the exact same post a few minutes ago ... (*scratch head*) )
The house I live in is over 100 years old. So are most houses in my street ... just saying. They luckily survived the last bombings in WWII. The center of the city got destroyed, but the "walls" of the houses survived, they got basically rebuild with the material laying around.
This is Darmstadt, after the bombings, did not find a picture of Karlsruhe (where I live): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
He isn't. If he was not once a presidental candidate, no one in the world would know him. /. rather funny.
I find all those Al Gore references on
In which part of the world do you live that nights are windless? Probably in the center of a desert? Hm, even there it is hard to imagine a windless night.
Another idiot who does not know what "base load" actually means: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Playing the idiot again?
How long does it take to build a nuclear plant and get it on the grid?
How much wind power or solar power can you build up during that time and connect part by part to the grid?
and are willing to throw out the one scale-able solution that is presently generating the most CO2 emission free electricity
In Germany wind and solar generate more power than nuclear. So is it in many countries as plenty of countries have not a single nuclear reactor.
Sentences that put "fear" and "irrational" together usually contain a lie.
Especially considering that most "anti-nukes" are rather rational anyway ... unlike the pro-nukes (which usually have no clue about basic physics).
The Venus atmosphere is mainly CO2.
The Venus is much closer to the sun.
Of course earth could have a short (in cosmic terms) period of a Venus like hell. Until all water has evaporated. The water will be split at the edge of the atmosphere and hydrogen will bleed away. No ieda how and when it stabelizes.
Anyway, the mechanisms on Earth would be different than those on Venus.