Reason: the only cell type that does not regenerate is central nervous system tissue - neurons, and cardiac muscle This is debunked since.... uh?... 40 or 50 years? Sure, I learned it in school 40 years ago, was already debunked at that time. Schoolbooks never updated... but that is no reason not to stay up to date.
sooner or later you'd wind up skinning your boss with a letter opener and skull-fucking the company president and his snotty secretary to death with the rolled up hide. Where do you work? It sounds like fun!
Point is: the anti alcohol theme is a made up thing by some mullahs in the middle ages. Mohamed himself was not against drinking: he was against getting drunk/stoned! He proclaimed a man should not consume "drugs" to the point that his mind is altered and reasoning is affected.
But you see how religion, especially the make hierachies are abused to put power over people or pressure on them. Iran was once a big wine exporter, they had great wines. Now it is even forbidden to grow the grapes. They destroyed a fortune, probably worth 100ds of billions in our days money, in wine yards after the revolution. Imagine what one would pay for 100 acres of 80 or 100 year old wine plants?
Most Canabis smokers smoke it together with tobacco. And on top of that are regular smokers of tobacco anyway... so you have all kinds of health risks. If you smoke it pure, it should not have many risks, depending on how much you smoke, obviously. Or just eat it...
such as tuberculosis, which is hidden in the text affecting primarily only poorly developed countries, probably not anyone reading this Germany has about 5000 cases every year. Mainly because it is relatively rare, it is often not diagnosed in time. It has not much to do with poverty per se...
People who drink a lot (yes the study is not about "a lot" but about "any consumption") usually also have other bad habits, like smoking, bad sleep patterns, overworked, stress.
Anyway, mankind is drinking alcohol since 10,000 years, probably longer. I drink since 35, and hope to live another 40 years. No reason to give up a good beer or a good wine. Or for that matter a good Scottish or Irish Whiskey
I had a computer at the time of its release with 8Mb and didn't install '95 because I knew it wouldn't work. Then you knew wrong. It had ran happily in 4MB, too. And with 8MB it would not swap, unless you had strong requirements. I developed in C++ and later in Java on it (16MB). There never was any problem.
Windows 95, Crashed on the slightest off glance, memory thrashing, memory leaks or buffer overflow can take control of your system, but you didn't even need to do that level of attack because in order to operate it properly you needed to run Windows 95 as Admin otherwise most applications and external hardware will not work. That is nonsense. Both Win95 and Win98 were extremely stable, and I never ran any computer as admin, regardless what OS. Never any problems with that.
Calories in food are measured by "average human is able to digest". There is no real hard number. E.g. the amount of "energy" you need to digest a certain thing, is already substracted from the amount of calories.
E.g. you eat 200gram potatoes and it says 800cal, in fact it has perhaps 900cal or 1000cal, but "scientiests know" you have to burn some 100-200cal to even digest it, so they substract that and come down to 800cal.
Then again if you eat straw (or anything containing fibers) , for the human body it has 0 as in zero calories, because we can not digest straw. But for cows it has a lot of calories as they can actually digest it. However: humans who got contaminated with the same gut bacteria as those cows: can digest fibers, too! Hence something that has 500cal on paper (for humans) suddenly has 1500 cals for humans who are "infected" by cow gut bacteria. That converts a healthy broccoli into a cal bomb.
You are perfectly right: That what the " {food eaten} - {calories burned} = {remaining fat} " crowd doesn't get.s A chocolate bar, like in the link below, consists out of sugar and fat. If you are already obese and eat one, the mixture of sugar and fat will cause an insulin reaction. Depositing 100% of the fat in the fat cells, and burning most of the sugar. If you eat a few of them in short notice, even most of the sugar gets converted into fat, too. And that has absolutely nothing to do with the amount of calories you just ate and what your body burns on a regular basis per day.
One of the best diets is: adjust your day to an 8h period and an 16h period. Only eat during the 8h. You actually can shift the 8h on a day to day basics and only need to make sure that you don't eat for at least 16h before the next eating period starts.
Of course that rules out: getting up at 5:00 having breakfast at 6:00, lunch at 12:00 and dinner at 18:00...
I for my part only eat once or twice a day... depending where I am and what I do physically. When I'm in Thailand I likely eat all day long, 5 5 5
and I bet that they instead simply exercised too little and ate too much, you'd lose your money. Actually you would lose. The amount of calories you can burn by exercising is so small it has absolutely no effect on the fact if you are obese or not. Calorie intake, and the mix of them, e.g. fat + sugar versus fibers and proteins, is basically the only thing that influences your body weight.
Hint: look up how much calories you burn doing swimming, weight lifting, cycling, running, sleeping. And then compare it with a simple hamburger.
You will be surprised about weight lifting/gym hours...
Start doing a Martial art, Aikido, Tai Chi, Baguazhang or Chi Gong. It is addictive enough to drive you to the training without any "overcoming yourself every day".
Of cours MMA fanbois will ridicule you for doing a pussy martial art:D I guess you can live with that.
But neither should we pretend that it's acceptable. It's one of if not the biggest health risk most people face today. And the campaign against fat shaming seems to have overshot its mark, and is now killing people by making it socially acceptable to be fat. The problem is the food, hence the food industry. If you have no laws against unhealthy food, how do you suppose to prevent people getting fat? Or look at asian countries, they don't need laws, because the culture simply loathes unhealthy food. Perhaps you find a way to establish a healthy culture, a health culture, a healthy food culture.
Your numbers do not hold up at all for diet changes. You switch to a healthy diet and you can be as slim as you want, except you have the wrong gut bacterias, and that is only a very small percentage of society.
Slashdot Mirror
Reason: the only cell type that does not regenerate is central nervous system tissue - neurons, and cardiac muscle .... uh? ... 40 or 50 years? Sure, I learned it in school 40 years ago, was already debunked at that time. Schoolbooks never updated ... but that is no reason not to stay up to date.
This is debunked since
ALL CELLS REGENERATE!
If that ceases to be a major cause of death, what is next? Obesity? We get told off for that, too.
No! No! The next thing is having sex! You can die due to an heart attack, or a brain seizure! It is super dangerous!
Well, other studies claim it is healthy for your immune system and cardio ... I'm confused now.
Yeah, :D luckily my mates in the Dojo think the same!!
but after doing my 90 minutes "combat sports", I definitely need 2 or 3 beers
sooner or later you'd wind up skinning your boss with a letter opener and skull-fucking the company president and his snotty secretary to death with the rolled up hide.
Where do you work?
It sounds like fun!
I was about to post exactly the same about an hour ago, ha ha :D
And in Turkey or Tunesia everyone drinks.
Point is: the anti alcohol theme is a made up thing by some mullahs in the middle ages. Mohamed himself was not against drinking: he was against getting drunk/stoned! He proclaimed a man should not consume "drugs" to the point that his mind is altered and reasoning is affected.
But you see how religion, especially the make hierachies are abused to put power over people or pressure on them. Iran was once a big wine exporter, they had great wines. Now it is even forbidden to grow the grapes. They destroyed a fortune, probably worth 100ds of billions in our days money, in wine yards after the revolution. Imagine what one would pay for 100 acres of 80 or 100 year old wine plants?
The positive effects don't come from alcohol, but the other stuff in the beverages, as in wine.
Most Canabis smokers smoke it together with tobacco. And on top of that are regular smokers of tobacco anyway ... so you have all kinds of health risks. ...
If you smoke it pure, it should not have many risks, depending on how much you smoke, obviously. Or just eat it
A little bit of butter and a hot chocolate (mean from cacao and milk).
Or cookies with chocolate.
"Officially" alcohol is a tasteless substance. :P
So if it tastes bad for you, you most likely simply don't like wine
such as tuberculosis, which is hidden in the text affecting primarily only poorly developed countries, probably not anyone reading this ...
Germany has about 5000 cases every year. Mainly because it is relatively rare, it is often not diagnosed in time.
It has not much to do with poverty per se
People who drink a lot (yes the study is not about "a lot" but about "any consumption") usually also have other bad habits, like smoking, bad sleep patterns, overworked, stress.
Anyway, mankind is drinking alcohol since 10,000 years, probably longer. I drink since 35, and hope to live another 40 years. No reason to give up a good beer or a good wine. Or for that matter a good Scottish or Irish Whiskey
I had a computer at the time of its release with 8Mb and didn't install '95 because I knew it wouldn't work.
Then you knew wrong. It had ran happily in 4MB, too. And with 8MB it would not swap, unless you had strong requirements. I developed in C++ and later in Java on it (16MB). There never was any problem.
Get a damn clue.
It is written in JavaScript.
No one is forcing you to use it ...
Windows 95, Crashed on the slightest off glance, memory thrashing, memory leaks or buffer overflow can take control of your system, but you didn't even need to do that level of attack because in order to operate it properly you needed to run Windows 95 as Admin otherwise most applications and external hardware will not work.
That is nonsense.
Both Win95 and Win98 were extremely stable, and I never ran any computer as admin, regardless what OS. Never any problems with that.
Funny,
I was thinking this morning what hooks I have to make to install my old StarCraft again.
It is not wrong. You are an idiot.
Calories in food are measured by "average human is able to digest". There is no real hard number.
E.g. the amount of "energy" you need to digest a certain thing, is already substracted from the amount of calories.
E.g. you eat 200gram potatoes and it says 800cal, in fact it has perhaps 900cal or 1000cal, but "scientiests know" you have to burn some 100-200cal to even digest it, so they substract that and come down to 800cal.
Then again if you eat straw (or anything containing fibers) , for the human body it has 0 as in zero calories, because we can not digest straw. But for cows it has a lot of calories as they can actually digest it. However: humans who got contaminated with the same gut bacteria as those cows: can digest fibers, too! Hence something that has 500cal on paper (for humans) suddenly has 1500 cals for humans who are "infected" by cow gut bacteria. That converts a healthy broccoli into a cal bomb.
You are perfectly right: That what the " {food eaten} - {calories burned} = {remaining fat} " crowd doesn't get.s
A chocolate bar, like in the link below, consists out of sugar and fat. If you are already obese and eat one, the mixture of sugar and fat will cause an insulin reaction. Depositing 100% of the fat in the fat cells, and burning most of the sugar. If you eat a few of them in short notice, even most of the sugar gets converted into fat, too. And that has absolutely nothing to do with the amount of calories you just ate and what your body burns on a regular basis per day.
https://www.worldofsweets.de/M...
One of the best diets is: adjust your day to an 8h period and an 16h period. Only eat during the 8h.
You actually can shift the 8h on a day to day basics and only need to make sure that you don't eat for at least 16h before the next eating period starts.
Of course that rules out: getting up at 5:00 having breakfast at 6:00, lunch at 12:00 and dinner at 18:00 ...
I for my part only eat once or twice a day ... depending where I am and what I do physically. When I'm in Thailand I likely eat all day long, 5 5 5
Hae?
What has lack of sleep to do with staying up late?
Do you have a comprehension problem?
There is a huge amount of people who have sleep problems ... that has nothing to do with which time you go to bed and which time you get up.
and I bet that they instead simply exercised too little and ate too much, you'd lose your money.
Actually you would lose.
The amount of calories you can burn by exercising is so small it has absolutely no effect on the fact if you are obese or not. Calorie intake, and the mix of them, e.g. fat + sugar versus fibers and proteins, is basically the only thing that influences your body weight.
Hint: look up how much calories you burn doing swimming, weight lifting, cycling, running, sleeping. And then compare it with a simple hamburger.
You will be surprised about weight lifting/gym hours ...
Start doing a Martial art, Aikido, Tai Chi, Baguazhang or Chi Gong.
It is addictive enough to drive you to the training without any "overcoming yourself every day".
Of cours MMA fanbois will ridicule you for doing a pussy martial art :D I guess you can live with that.
But neither should we pretend that it's acceptable. It's one of if not the biggest health risk most people face today. And the campaign against fat shaming seems to have overshot its mark, and is now killing people by making it socially acceptable to be fat.
The problem is the food, hence the food industry. If you have no laws against unhealthy food, how do you suppose to prevent people getting fat?
Or look at asian countries, they don't need laws, because the culture simply loathes unhealthy food. Perhaps you find a way to establish a healthy culture, a health culture, a healthy food culture.
Your numbers do not hold up at all for diet changes.
You switch to a healthy diet and you can be as slim as you want, except you have the wrong gut bacterias, and that is only a very small percentage of society.