Er, I was under the impression that Apache still has the larger market share, so who's walking all over who? Honestly, I don't think even this ".Net works with Apache" crap is gonna switch people over either.
My Dual-533 at work performed beautifully. The 1.7GHz P4 my office supplied didn't cut it. Mind you, neither of us are giving hard data/numbers here, so our statements are opinion.
Why would you even bother running OS X on a Beige G3? That's like running Windows 2000 on a PentiumII/350 with 64 MB RAM. It's a minimum, but not recommended. OS X ran fairly well with my blue & white G3/256MB. Kingston memory makes all the difference with OS X.
As for wired, I'm not impressed with their tech pop reporting. Sure, I'll grab a copy once in a while to check out new technologies, but their accuracy on Mac stories remains to be seen.
OK, so someone has to be in a contract to make software that complies with AOL's IM servers. So what?
From the article it sounds like they don't want to standardize. Typical, fine. Get a company in a contract and AOL will provide the company info needed to create a client.
Somebody's going to make the virus. Odds are they're going to distribute it whether legal or not. It's up to folks who track viruses to find distributions of viruses and counter. I figure it as preventive maintenance.
I gave my impression of the concept. Jump down someone else's throat.
Granted, I've taken a quick look through of the Integrating OS X with Active Directory PDF, but I didn't see mention of their higher education initiative.
These guys had preliminary information concerning this...did Apple complete the info or take the information from the Universities it was working with and publish it without giving them credit?
I'm not trying to start anything, just want to make sure credit is given where it's due.
It seems from the instructions that you have to create custom fields in the schemato make this happen (e.g. unixid). Higher-ups are a little nervous about this because changing the schema can severely alter the AD.
I was under the impression that if you installed Services for Unix on the box hosting the AD, these fields would be automatically added, but would you still have to create unique LDAP IDs for each user? Is there a way you can do this in bulk?
Slashdot Mirror
Cop-out or not, they can't be extremely rigid to everyone all the time. Especially with that kind of business.
The Troll mod order goes down kids, down.
Er, I was under the impression that Apache still has the larger market share, so who's walking all over who? Honestly, I don't think even this ".Net works with Apache" crap is gonna switch people over either.
I know it's an early release, but why not use Chimera? It's got a cocoa front end which is pretty smooth and it's just the browser.
My Dual-533 at work performed beautifully. The 1.7GHz P4 my office supplied didn't cut it. Mind you, neither of us are giving hard data/numbers here, so our statements are opinion.
Why would you even bother running OS X on a Beige G3? That's like running Windows 2000 on a PentiumII/350 with 64 MB RAM. It's a minimum, but not recommended. OS X ran fairly well with my blue & white G3/256MB. Kingston memory makes all the difference with OS X.
As for wired, I'm not impressed with their tech pop reporting. Sure, I'll grab a copy once in a while to check out new technologies, but their accuracy on Mac stories remains to be seen.
Enjoy your weekend
Just because you don't want to pay for it doesn't mean you have to spread ill-researched crap about it.
I'm keeping mine because I like the features. Roughly $8/mo isn't much to ask.
Life with Macintosh Computers will improve.
And AI just sounds cool. That and IBM can taken PowerPC chips WAAAAAYYYY beyond.
From the article it sounds like they don't want to standardize. Typical, fine. Get a company in a contract and AOL will provide the company info needed to create a client.
No one said AOL will do the work for you.
Is he trying to make it look like MS doesn't want control over data management, just buddy up with the competition?
Why would he even admit this?
Somebody's going to make the virus. Odds are they're going to distribute it whether legal or not. It's up to folks who track viruses to find distributions of viruses and counter. I figure it as preventive maintenance.
I gave my impression of the concept. Jump down someone else's throat.
The more known the code becomes, the easier it is to counter it.
It also separates the wheat from the chaff in terms of IT employees. Whoever keeps up is a valuable resource in a sea of lax workers
A television has limited function; you watch it, you adjust the volume, you change the channel.
Computers are two-way; you input from one of the many sources you can, the computer gives you a result (whether you like it or not)
Why even bother mentioning that?
These guys had preliminary information concerning this...did Apple complete the info or take the information from the Universities it was working with and publish it without giving them credit?
I'm not trying to start anything, just want to make sure credit is given where it's due.
I was under the impression that if you installed Services for Unix on the box hosting the AD, these fields would be automatically added, but would you still have to create unique LDAP IDs for each user? Is there a way you can do this in bulk?