- manipulator hand - back-vision camera for security - stilt high resolution photo-camera (on manipulator hand), to make still HD photos, in addition to webcam feed
The problem may be that we produce and consume too much energy without a good reason. The are possible negative consequences like unpredictable climate and technical catastrophes.
The nuclear energy is a radical approach, but there are also radical approaches in efficiency, which could be implemented right now. For example this kind of transportation is 100 (!) ties more efficient even than a train: http://www.et3.com/ett.asp . And it can be done, it just needs a will and investment.
Research and development in the fields of LED lamps, new thermal insulation materials for walls, windows, etc., car weight reduction and so on and so forth would be much more effective way to produce energy by reducing consumption.
This is already happening. The ISP owners open its Internet shop and do not let other Internet shops into their network. I have this problem with at least 2 ISPs.
The ISPs should be watched carefully. They should, speaking figuratively, maintain the bridge technically, but not be traffic regulators.
I worked at the border. Borders do not stop people, but jobs and co-development do.
A lot of people try to cross border illegally to get a new status. If there was not visa requirement and people could move freely, many immigrants would actually part from the USA. The market would start to work.
Such thing happened in China when they canceled permits for living in a city. Many people sat tight in cities, only because they had invested in permits.
Ironically it was the USA who called the former USSR to "tear down this wall" and for a world without walls. Also ironically much more people were shot near on this wall, than at the Berlin wall.
Or outsourcing non-violent hacking crimes. Say, sending to a small village in Siberia where the only way out is a bus once a month and boarding is supervised by a cop. Certainly, no Internet for a thousand miles around.
No way to walk away due to marches, woods and wolves.
To survive in such a village during winter one has to work a lot outdoors while preparing firewood for a stove. Very healthy and could clean a head.
I heard Germany and Russia did something like this in the field of a penitentiary outsourcing for young criminals.
The woman came out to talk, to listen, probably to change her opinion. Put the table, a chair and a clear sign that it will be a discussion. He could argue with her openly, present his arguments and grievances.
Instead he hit her in the head. What a senseless stupid act of violence.
I hope that the people in the USA are smart enough not to let their great land, the land of the free, to plunge into a chaos because of these isolated provocations.
The most common way of communicating is misunderstanding. This was my point that the working relationship is to be constructed to prevent such things.
Certainly this is a hard task. There are linguistic, cultural, economical barriers. But it's too easy and convenient to say that everybody is corrupted in Belarus police and Interpol and nothing can be done at all.
This type of activity is illegal in Belarus too. The streets there do have names and houses are numbered. True, it is not in English.
Still if it was some kid, a call from the Interpol to Belarus police, and the employees probably could have they files back. Sometimes learning foreign languages at school could be very useful.
Just buy a netbook and the USB radio-modem for the Internet access. So you will have the best of 2 worlds. Skype and whatever on the netbook and office applications on the company desktop.
I bought 4 seasons of the serial "Army wives" on DVDs. In this movie the families speak with deployed soldiers not via Skype but via some other VoIP program. I though the army provides some special VoIP soft for this.
I wonder from what OS the leaks' files were taken? Were them.txt files? Or some.doc files? Or maybe.odt files?
Or were they HTML pages? Then on what web server?
Do we know it? I've never seen that info. It is like when a newspaper writes that a cyclists was killed and they never write if he was wearing a helmet, having lights during the dark time, etc. No useful information whatsoever.
Files were taken... What files??? Taken from were? How? Could not we have some useful information for our organization? Some specifics.
Like - was it possible to prevent it at all? If yes how? Blocking USB sockets? - but this is ridiculous. It is like forbidding, say, illustrations in books during Reformation.
Maybe not having secrets at all? Or what? I just cannot think of anything useful about this story.
There people in trenches and posts who are the only thing what separates the world from tyranny and darkness. Yes, Wikileaks are fun, but I do not want these people die because of it. Assange and co should be careful what they publish after all.
When one has a tool, which costs a trillion per year, one wants to use it to get a return on the investment. A lot of words could be woven to justify it, but a trillion is still an elephant in the room.
"I wanted you to see what real courage is, instead of getting the idea that courage is a man with a gun in his hand. It's when you know you're licked before you begin but you begin anyway and you see it through no matter what. You rarely win, but sometimes you do."
It is not that easy to kill Assange. A lot of people may see it as a sin and may give away the secret.
'Mockingbirds don't do one thing but make music for us to enjoy. They don't eat up people's gardens, don't nest in corncribs, they don't do one thing but sing their hearts out for us. That's why it's a sin to kill a mockingbird.' Miss Maudie Atkinson in Harper Lee's "To Kill a Mockingbird"
I think it was the reason why the Soviet dissidents were not killed, at least some of the most notorious of them.
Julian Assange is the first true dissident, prisoners of conscience of the English civilization.
I remember how the similar phenomena appeared in the former Soviet Union from the blue sky. Any structured society is based on certain set of generally accepted lies. And it is not always bad. For example, we say to each other "you look great", even in cases when it is not so.
These people had no fear of death, some aberration of nature. For the state based on organized violence it was a major glitch, which finally brought it down.
The Air Force is in a way right, that it recognized the potential danger of such seemingly soft spoken people. Julian Assange is a thing which may bring down the whole state. He may be stronger than all the ministries, army, fleet, police, etc. taken together. That is exactly what happened with the USSR. It is not possible to scare such people, not possible to execute them, and even less possible to silence them.
Slashdot Mirror
- manipulator hand
- back-vision camera for security
- stilt high resolution photo-camera (on manipulator hand), to make still HD photos, in addition to webcam feed
The problem may be that we produce and consume too much energy without a good reason. The are possible negative consequences like unpredictable climate and technical catastrophes.
The nuclear energy is a radical approach, but there are also radical approaches in efficiency, which could be implemented right now. For example this kind of transportation is 100 (!) ties more efficient even than a train: http://www.et3.com/ett.asp . And it can be done, it just needs a will and investment.
Research and development in the fields of LED lamps, new thermal insulation materials for walls, windows, etc., car weight reduction and so on and so forth would be much more effective way to produce energy by reducing consumption.
FTP
This is already happening. The ISP owners open its Internet shop and do not let other Internet shops into their network. I have this problem with at least 2 ISPs.
The ISPs should be watched carefully. They should, speaking figuratively, maintain the bridge technically, but not be traffic regulators.
Is it only women who could be executed for an infidelity? Or men too?
I worked at the border. Borders do not stop people, but jobs and co-development do.
A lot of people try to cross border illegally to get a new status. If there was not visa requirement and people could move freely, many immigrants would actually part from the USA. The market would start to work.
Such thing happened in China when they canceled permits for living in a city. Many people sat tight in cities, only because they had invested in permits.
Ironically it was the USA who called the former USSR to "tear down this wall" and for a world without walls. Also ironically much more people were shot near on this wall, than at the Berlin wall.
Or outsourcing non-violent hacking crimes. Say, sending to a small village in Siberia where the only way out is a bus once a month and boarding is supervised by a cop. Certainly, no Internet for a thousand miles around.
No way to walk away due to marches, woods and wolves.
To survive in such a village during winter one has to work a lot outdoors while preparing firewood for a stove. Very healthy and could clean a head.
I heard Germany and Russia did something like this in the field of a penitentiary outsourcing for young criminals.
Maybe we should view the wiki-leaks' journalists as investigators of the people? People have the right to know?
Maybe such things will happen not only with the US documents, but with other governments' documents, and people, well, will have a better insight?
The woman came out to talk, to listen, probably to change her opinion. Put the table, a chair and a clear sign that it will be a discussion. He could argue with her openly, present his arguments and grievances.
Instead he hit her in the head. What a senseless stupid act of violence.
I hope that the people in the USA are smart enough not to let their great land, the land of the free, to plunge into a chaos because of these isolated provocations.
The most common way of communicating is misunderstanding. This was my point that the working relationship is to be constructed to prevent such things.
Certainly this is a hard task. There are linguistic, cultural, economical barriers. But it's too easy and convenient to say that everybody is corrupted in Belarus police and Interpol and nothing can be done at all.
Belarus is a country in Eastern Europe, with the capital - Minsk.
In the article it is written that files were sent to a server in Belarus. My point is that it is not like they were sent to the Mars.
And if there were a good working relationship between criminal police in D.C. and in Minsk, this could be easily solved or even prevented.
This type of activity is illegal in Belarus too. The streets there do have names and houses are numbered. True, it is not in English.
Still if it was some kid, a call from the Interpol to Belarus police, and the employees probably could have they files back. Sometimes learning foreign languages at school could be very useful.
If yes, would it not be equal if China wants its companies in EU?
Just buy a netbook and the USB radio-modem for the Internet access. So you will have the best of 2 worlds. Skype and whatever on the netbook and office applications on the company desktop.
Do you speak about the US army?
I bought 4 seasons of the serial "Army wives" on DVDs. In this movie the families speak with deployed soldiers not via Skype but via some other VoIP program. I though the army provides some special VoIP soft for this.
I wonder from what OS the leaks' files were taken? Were them .txt files? Or some .doc files? Or maybe .odt files?
Or were they HTML pages? Then on what web server?
Do we know it? I've never seen that info. It is like when a newspaper writes that a cyclists was killed and they never write if he was wearing a helmet, having lights during the dark time, etc. No useful information whatsoever.
Files were taken... What files??? Taken from were? How? Could not we have some useful information for our organization? Some specifics.
Like - was it possible to prevent it at all? If yes how? Blocking USB sockets? - but this is ridiculous. It is like forbidding, say, illustrations in books during Reformation.
Maybe not having secrets at all? Or what? I just cannot think of anything useful about this story.
It is absolutely correct decision. It is not possible to know what is inside the compiled soft.
Besides the problem of a "monoculture" is very serious.
There people in trenches and posts who are the only thing what separates the world from tyranny and darkness. Yes, Wikileaks are fun, but I do not want these people die because of it. Assange and co should be careful what they publish after all.
When one has a tool, which costs a trillion per year, one wants to use it to get a return on the investment. A lot of words could be woven to justify it, but a trillion is still an elephant in the room.
I was speaking of the dissidents. The men and women who change the world around us big time. Us. You recognize one when you see him/her.
Speaking about remote history I would think rather of Giordano Bruno, René Descartes, Jesus Christ. However they were not English speakers.
"I wanted you to see what real courage is, instead of getting the idea that courage is a man with a gun in his hand. It's when you know you're licked before you begin but you begin anyway and you see it through no matter what. You rarely win, but sometimes you do."
Harper Lee, "To Kill a Mockingbird"
It is not that easy to kill Assange. A lot of people may see it as a sin and may give away the secret.
'Mockingbirds don't do one thing but make music for us to enjoy. They don't eat up people's gardens, don't nest in corncribs, they don't do one thing but sing their hearts out for us. That's why it's a sin to kill a mockingbird.' Miss Maudie Atkinson in Harper Lee's "To Kill a Mockingbird"
I think it was the reason why the Soviet dissidents were not killed, at least some of the most notorious of them.
Julian Assange is the first true dissident, prisoners of conscience of the English civilization.
I remember how the similar phenomena appeared in the former Soviet Union from the blue sky. Any structured society is based on certain set of generally accepted lies. And it is not always bad. For example, we say to each other "you look great", even in cases when it is not so.
These people however want to bring the truth come hell or water high. But the truth is often destructive. No matter what state did to frighten them, to silence them, it did not work. These were Anatoliy Scheranskiy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natan_Sharansky , Elena Bonner http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elena_Bonner , Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Solzhenitsyn and some others.
These people had no fear of death, some aberration of nature. For the state based on organized violence it was a major glitch, which finally brought it down.
The Air Force is in a way right, that it recognized the potential danger of such seemingly soft spoken people. Julian Assange is a thing which may bring down the whole state. He may be stronger than all the ministries, army, fleet, police, etc. taken together. That is exactly what happened with the USSR. It is not possible to scare such people, not possible to execute them, and even less possible to silence them.