I am not sure what you find bizarre here. Why would you think real people should be covered by copyright protection? the characters have no rights, the owners of the art have the rights, i.e. real people.
Perhaps they should be covered by some other means of protection so that the blood sucking scum called Hollywood can't piss all over great literary works. I shiver to think of the shit they will produce as a result of this,
You don't need to have a monopoly for price fixing to be illegal. they could be a 1% market share and it would still be illegal. They have no right to interfere with the carriers pricing except to dictate the price that they sell to the carrier at and even that has to be on fair and equitable terms.
No you aren't. All countries are NOT equal, some governments provide healthcare, wealthfare and many other services that cost money. Countries could only compete on an equal footing if they all had an equal cost basis. The only logical and sane solution at this point in time is to force companies to pay the taxes where the customers are based.
If you see a brand name or logo in a movie or TV you can be damn well certain they are paying for it. Product placement is not given away for free and the editors will take special care to edit out names and brands of items that haven't paid for product placement.
What arse backwards countries use money made of paper? money is generally stored electronically nowadays, some is printed on plastic or cotton materials for convenience but that is certainly only one form it can take and not the definitive one.
whether it is his job or not it is true. There will ALWAYS be new vulnerabilities discovered, even the best reviewed, best written software will have bugs and XP isn't either of those. if people are still using it to access the internet they SHOULD BE doing panicked upgrades.
You honestly have not dealt with much malware. Most of it is atrociously written and more often then not only detected because it chews up system resources or causes crashes. only a tiny percentage of malware is written well.
It isn't the worst possible thing because of its detection rate. It is the worst possible thing because of the impact it has on a system, many cases the impact is worse than what it is protecting against, add to that the intrusive annoying nature of the product and you get something that is like chopping your legs off to avoid stubbing your toes.
bullshit, I said people have overinflated view of how much bandwidth you require for work due to bandwidth intensive sites. The rest was made up in your own head.
you have to go back a few years to find such a huge drop in currency value. 20-50% drops and rises in BTC are a DAILY occurance. It is closer to a stock or a commodity than it is a currency.
what has gaming and streaming 1080p got to do with working over a low speed link? unless you are specifically a game tester or video stream editor you are just building a strawman. I never claimed or argued they would be good for such purposes.
nothing much has changed in 5 years that would make working from home any harder on such a link. Unless he is into high end photo or video editing it just means it is slow to surf utube during breaks. I CURRENTLY regularly work via a 500kbps link and it is perfectly fine, most people have an overinflated view of what you actually require for bandwidth which has come from multimedia intensive sites and streaming video.
If they use the scanners correctly they are actually a fantastic tool for police. allows them to actually target stolen cars, unregistered drivers, suspended drivers etc far better at a far lower cost to the tax payer than pulling over every car. They use them here in Australia very effectively.
I never claimed libs are better. Though it would truly be hard to do worse than the previous 6 years at this point. a new set of incompetence and neglect doesn't excuse the grouse mismanagement of the previous government.
Slashdot Mirror
Generally it comes under trade mark protection and protection against false endorsements.
I am not sure what you find bizarre here. Why would you think real people should be covered by copyright protection? the characters have no rights, the owners of the art have the rights, i.e. real people.
Perhaps they should be covered by some other means of protection so that the blood sucking scum called Hollywood can't piss all over great literary works. I shiver to think of the shit they will produce as a result of this,
Argentina is a common launching point for expeditions to the Antarctic, it would be stunning if they had no ice breakers.
You don't need to have a monopoly for price fixing to be illegal. they could be a 1% market share and it would still be illegal. They have no right to interfere with the carriers pricing except to dictate the price that they sell to the carrier at and even that has to be on fair and equitable terms.
No you aren't. All countries are NOT equal, some governments provide healthcare, wealthfare and many other services that cost money. Countries could only compete on an equal footing if they all had an equal cost basis. The only logical and sane solution at this point in time is to force companies to pay the taxes where the customers are based.
Can't go past the goodies for UK breakthrough uses of computers. Graham even married his supercomputer in one episode.
If you see a brand name or logo in a movie or TV you can be damn well certain they are paying for it. Product placement is not given away for free and the editors will take special care to edit out names and brands of items that haven't paid for product placement.
What arse backwards countries use money made of paper? money is generally stored electronically nowadays, some is printed on plastic or cotton materials for convenience but that is certainly only one form it can take and not the definitive one.
whether it is his job or not it is true. There will ALWAYS be new vulnerabilities discovered, even the best reviewed, best written software will have bugs and XP isn't either of those. if people are still using it to access the internet they SHOULD BE doing panicked upgrades.
You honestly have not dealt with much malware. Most of it is atrociously written and more often then not only detected because it chews up system resources or causes crashes. only a tiny percentage of malware is written well.
It isn't the worst possible thing because of its detection rate. It is the worst possible thing because of the impact it has on a system, many cases the impact is worse than what it is protecting against, add to that the intrusive annoying nature of the product and you get something that is like chopping your legs off to avoid stubbing your toes.
Yep, no way in hell anything with Norton on it would run as fast as a 486
since when do sites like youtube, Netflix or twitch MATTER FOR WORK? are you just retarded or simply don't bother to read.
bullshit, I said people have overinflated view of how much bandwidth you require for work due to bandwidth intensive sites. The rest was made up in your own head.
you have to go back a few years to find such a huge drop in currency value. 20-50% drops and rises in BTC are a DAILY occurance. It is closer to a stock or a commodity than it is a currency.
I can call what comes out of a horses arse Currency too, it doesn't make it so.
what has gaming and streaming 1080p got to do with working over a low speed link? unless you are specifically a game tester or video stream editor you are just building a strawman. I never claimed or argued they would be good for such purposes.
ummmm that is using a mix of SSH and citrix, probably half and half.
nothing much has changed in 5 years that would make working from home any harder on such a link. Unless he is into high end photo or video editing it just means it is slow to surf utube during breaks. I CURRENTLY regularly work via a 500kbps link and it is perfectly fine, most people have an overinflated view of what you actually require for bandwidth which has come from multimedia intensive sites and streaming video.
What article? it is just another bloggers rant. I hate DRM but only an idiot would use that article as evidence to how bad it is.
So are you saying the article is WRONG and they aren't mounted on the vehicles? or did you just not read the article?
If they use the scanners correctly they are actually a fantastic tool for police. allows them to actually target stolen cars, unregistered drivers, suspended drivers etc far better at a far lower cost to the tax payer than pulling over every car. They use them here in Australia very effectively.
I never claimed libs are better. Though it would truly be hard to do worse than the previous 6 years at this point. a new set of incompetence and neglect doesn't excuse the grouse mismanagement of the previous government.
While Murdoch is a prick. He can hardly be blamed for a labor governments incompetence of over promising and underdelivering.