As pointed out in eXper Zone, If GNOME claims, "In keeping with GNOME's 'users first' philosophy, GNOME makes stable releases every six months. This delivers improvements to users quickly, and allows developers and distributors to plan their GNOME-based products with confidence," then I have to say the response, "Bugzilla supports voting out of the box; we've previously discussed this and decided it wasn't in our best interests. A feature will be implemented if and only if there is a developer who wants to implement it, regardless of the number of votes it's recieved" certainly is not appropriate. How can it be both user first and say, "A feature will be implemented if and only if there is a developer who wants to implement it, regardless of the number of votes it's recieved" at the same time?
Slashdot Mirror
Wow, it seems that US has no spy in China. Why does Americans like to think that they are always right and just? Totally BS
As pointed out in eXper Zone, If GNOME claims, "In keeping with GNOME's 'users first' philosophy, GNOME makes stable releases every six months. This delivers improvements to users quickly, and allows developers and distributors to plan their GNOME-based products with confidence," then I have to say the response, "Bugzilla supports voting out of the box; we've previously discussed this and decided it wasn't in our best interests. A feature will be implemented if and only if there is a developer who wants to implement it, regardless of the number of votes it's recieved" certainly is not appropriate. How can it be both user first and say, "A feature will be implemented if and only if there is a developer who wants to implement it, regardless of the number of votes it's recieved" at the same time?