Slashdot Mirror


Lenovo Under U.S. Probe for Spying

BigControversy writes "The DailyTech has a report indicating that Lenovo, the giant Chinese PC manufacturer, is under a probe by the U.S.-China Economic Security Review Commission (USCC) for possible bugging. Apparently, the government has ordered 16,000 PCs from Lenovo but is now requesting that Lenovo be investigated by intelligence agencies. The fear is of foreign intelligence applying pressure to Lenovo to equip its PCs so that the U.S. can be spied on." From the article: "Despite the probe, Lenovo says that its international business, especially those that deal with the US, follow strictly laid out government regulations and rules. Lenovo also claims that even after purchasing IBM's PC division, its international business has not been affected negatively. Interestingly, in an interview with the BBC, Lenovo mentioned that an open investigation or probe may negatively affect the way that the company deals with future government contracts or bids." There just has to be better uses of our intelligence community's time.

327 comments

  1. Disagree on the last comment by JMUChrisF · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't this the perfect use of our intelligence community? I think this is a very valid threat from a community like China who has been known to have spies in the US at all times. (Not saying we don't spy back, but that's the game!).

    A lot of federal agencies have policies about using foreign hardware/software for reasons just like this. Go USA!

    1. Re:Disagree on the last comment by hcob$ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Mod Parent up. It's a vaild point and no hint of a TROLL. Just some mod abusing power.

      --
      Cliff Claven
      K.E.G. Party Chairman
      Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
    2. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virtually all laptop manufacturing is already off-shore. If you're worried about foreign spying, you've already lost the war. This "investigation" is a complete waste of time.

    3. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Mattcelt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Absolutely! This is what the counterintelligence agencies DO!

      Seriously, who would be surprised if a Chinese company (remember the Chinese? They're still Communists!!) was encouraged to spy on U.S. Government agencies? To think otherwise is, IMO, incredibly naïve.

      Personally, I think Lenovo ought to be barred from selling hardware to the U.S. Government altogether. It's simply not worth the security risk.

    4. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Uber+Banker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Interesting point this. If these PCs were ordered from Dell which Levono purchased and which I'd reason was in part a basis for this deal, would an investigation have been ordered.

      IMHO, it is good practice to have standing procedures to investigate all contracts/purchases, be them government, business or personal. And it would be extremely bad procedure for a foreign government to attempt such a poor spying procedure, but no harm in checking, which I doubt would be very hard.

      But I think this is a very valid threat from a community like China who has been known to have spies in the US at all times. Well, the same is true of almost all countries I'm sure. And I'd also hazard a guess that social networking, for example having an operative in place for years only to pop in a USB key (or even manually scribe) and get what they want, is a much greater threat.

      I would disagree with use use of 'threat from a community like China' in your statement: China is booming because of free trade, they have a declining population (young people, infact the population is projected to increase for a while as life expectancy from the incumbant increases), and virtually everything to lose from any kind of hostile activity - its not as if a communist ideal exists in China today to peddle to the rest of the world.

      The story seems a bit of a non-entity. US government check out foreign contractor, probably a few man hours work. More important are the day-to-day checks. At least this doesn't seem to be a farce as the blocked Dubai-funded purchase of ports were.

    5. Re:Disagree on the last comment by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In light of all the spying that we did against the USSR (xerox copy machines, sabatoged oil line controls leading to an explosion, etc) and China (using Nauru's embassy, splices in the telecom, etc.) , we would be insane to not check the equipment. What amazes me is that over the last 5 years, our gov. has outsourced so many critical areas to nations that are at best neutral, and more likely future enemies.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Psx29 · · Score: 1

      I concur. This is exactly what those spy agencies _should_ be doing and I for one feel good they are actually doing something right instead of spying on individual US citizens for a change.

    7. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Confused · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A lot of federal agencies have policies about using foreign hardware/software for reasons just like this. Go USA!


      Oh yes, while the notebooks carried the IBM lable, they were good american products, while now they're evil chinese. Very interesting approach, considering that the computers were built all the time in the same factory in China.

      I guess, if you'd have to buy american-only computers, you won't be able to purchase from Dell, IBM, HP, Toshiba, Sun and most other brands.
    8. Re:Disagree on the last comment by langelgjm · · Score: 1

      they have a declining population

      Really? Or is it just a declining population growth rate? I'd be very surprised if they had managed to have a negative population growth rate.

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    9. Re:Disagree on the last comment by gnarlin · · Score: 1

      Now that you mention it, I would really like to know if it is at all possible to purchase a fully "Made in the USA" computer (desktop or laptop)? Do you know of any?

      --
      A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver.
    10. Re:Disagree on the last comment by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Actually, many of the IBM's pc were not made in China. Some assemblage went on there, but the design and the chip man. occured in the USA and Europe. Now, much of that has been moved to China.

      Keep in mind, that China, like USA, will go to great lengths to spy on others. We both do it against our own citizens as well as against other nations. USA really does need to check the equipment.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    11. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      / It looks like someone is trying   \
      | to spy on you. Would you like to? |
      | *Save your changes and exit now.  |
      | *Trace the attackers IP.          |
      \ *Turn off these warnings.         /
         /
      __/
      olo
      |||
      \_/

    12. Re:Disagree on the last comment by cfulmer · · Score: 1

      This is a bad policy for a number of reasons:

      (1) Factually, the computers are not being made in different placed than they were before or by different people. It should only be slightly easier for the Chinese to do this now that it's Lenovo and not "IBM PC Division."

      (2) Lets say that the Chinese were caught bugging computers -- it would be horrible public relations not only for Lenovo, which would lose some gigantic portion of its market share, but for the entire computer industry that manufactures overseas.

      (3) Considering the number of U.S. Citizens employed by Lenovo, what are the chances that none of them would clue in?

      This is really just a play by the anti-globalization people who scored a success in the Dubai PortsWorld deal and now see national security as an effective tool in their fight.

    13. Re:Disagree on the last comment by iocat · · Score: 1
      (Disclaimer: I just took possession of a sweet new Lenovo ThinkPad yesterday, so I already mey be compromised.)

      The risk/reward for putting a human asset into place is not as good as the risk/reward for spending an awful lot of time getting a sneaky key logger onto 14,000 machines. One guy with one USB key could cause an international incident for maybe 1 gig of files. A key logger doesn't require any human assets in place at the destination and can capture everything 14,000 gvt. employees type for the next five years.

      Assuming the IT guys are gonna wipe the drives, where would you hide a key logger in this situation? Little extra hardware in the USB bus?

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    14. Re:Disagree on the last comment by cching1112 · · Score: 1

      Wow, it seems that US has no spy in China. Why does Americans like to think that they are always right and just? Totally BS

    15. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the post again... it explicitly says that both sides spy on each other and both sides should try to detect spies.

    16. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Stargoat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Chinese communist government with nuclear missiles pointed at Japan, Taiwan, and the US do not have %10 share ownership of Dell. The Chinese communist government that is routinely caught spying on Japan, Taiwan, and the US does not have %10 share ownership of HP. The Chinese communist government that frequently trades with Iran, Libya and has been responsible for the dissemination of nuclear plans to Pakistan and North Korea does not have 10% share ownership of Toshiba.

      China is a problem. It is a problem in terms of human rights, and in terms of foreign policy. It is right and natural that the PCs the US government is purchasing from a company owned by a semi-hostile foreign government. (And if you think that the PRC is not hostile to the US and is actively promoting anti-Americanism for the purpose of pan-Chinese nationalism, spend some time over there.)

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    17. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I would disagree with use use of 'threat from a community like China' in your statement: China is booming because of free trade, they have a declining population (young people, infact the population is projected to increase for a while as life expectancy from the incumbant increases), and virtually everything to lose from any kind of hostile activity - its not as if a communist ideal exists in China today to peddle to the rest of the world.

      If you believe that, then I know a general who would like your address to send you a shipping container of "rice". Especially if you're close to Washington DC. (If you don't know, rice is a sufficient shield with a natural tendency to accumulate mildly radioactive minerals while growing- thus being a shield against our current radiation detector technology. You could smuggle a nuke in a container of rice, and nobody would know until glow-in-the-dark rice crispies started falling from the sky).

      Now to some extent I agree with you- but I think that capitalism and free trade isn't the new China. The new China is communism using capitalism and free trade to close US factories, to put Americans out of work, and their spy-master is Wal-Mart. I agree that they don't get anything from violence- they can get much more simply by purchasing our water supplies and then poisoning them.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    18. Re:Disagree on the last comment by MosesJones · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Seriously, who would be surprised if a Chinese company (remember the Chinese? They're still Communists!!) was encouraged to spy on U.S. Government agencies? To think otherwise is, IMO, incredibly naïve.

      Seriously, who would be suprised if a US Company (remember the US, they invaded Cuba, supported the Contras and recently invaded two countries and have taken part in illegal renditions and torture) was encouraged to spy on Foreign Goverment agencies, like the French, Russians, Chinese or Germans who opposed the 2nd UN resolution? To think otherwise is, IMO, incredibly naive.

      Equally you could say the same about the Brits, French, German, Russian etc etc etc Goverments who have ALL at sometime or another (like the US) used companies abroad to "help" with intelligence or the enforcement of policy (like the recent Cubans in the Hotel debacle).

      The reason for picking on China is xenophobia, plain, old and simple, dressed up in McCarthy era justifications around communism.

      --
      An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    19. Re:Disagree on the last comment by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Of course we have spies in China. It's not a matter of believing that we're better than other nations, it's a matter of security. Every nation is expected to take some precautions.

    20. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Of course America has spies in China just as China has spies in the US. That's natural, and so is taking precautions to make sure that China doesn't install backdoors in every laptop used by a major US government agency.

      I don't see what you're getting so uppity about.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    21. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I thought our intelligence groups were busy spying on Americans? I guess this is a case of the pot calling the kettle black.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    22. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

      The Chinese communist government with nuclear missiles pointed at Japan, Taiwan, and the US do not have %10 share ownership of Dell. The Chinese communist government that is routinely caught spying on Japan, Taiwan, and the US does not have %10 share ownership of HP. The Chinese communist government that frequently trades with Iran, Libya and has been responsible for the dissemination of nuclear plans to Pakistan and North Korea does not have 10% share ownership of Toshiba.

      Please forgive me:

      The US government, based on as reliable sources as yours, has nuclear missiles pointed at China. It is often caught spying on foreign governments, including NATO allies. The US government cited as an example of capitalism is truely capitalist with corporate pressure groups influencing law making procedures. The US government that traded with Iraq and countless other despot regeimes, and continues to do so, not least in South America.

      That you think the Chinese government 'diseminated' nuclear plans to India, Pakistan and North Korea is laughable. The first is a country economic relationships are only now being strengthened with after a long and cold relationship, the second is a largely muslim country (and China isn't too hot on religion), the third is a crackpot crazy place China is struggling to keep contained, be that refugees or a leader who thinks China is their only friend (and friend used loosely in the term of non explicit enemy).

      It is a problem in terms of human rights, and in terms of foreign policy.

      Absolutely there are human rights problems in China. More so than the US, IMHO. In terms of foreign policy I'm not so sure. What foreign policy does China exhibit a problem with? Invading Middle Eastern states, or objecting to invasions then doing nothing when they take place?

      But lastly, And if you think that the PRC is not hostile to the US and is actively promoting anti-Americanism for the purpose of pan-Chinese nationalism, spend some time over there. Well that's the crux. I live in China, and have done for the past 6 months or so, and in my work and personal life I have predominantly Chinese friends. It certainly has sone rough edges, but the US is regarded by most people as a successful country with extensive personal freedom (this is interpreted in one of 2 ways - the first being that 'Westerners' are more 'free with expression' the second that a richer economy allows one greater personal space, for example children can move out of home before marriage quite easily), good businesses (in a very admiring way), but has a somewhat autocratic government - ask a CEO, a student or a taxi driver, this is their usual reply. How about you spend some time over here (and check out some of my other posts for statements also stating that I live in China, if you don't believe it)?

    23. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      I would presume that ANY PC hardware offered by any company inside or outside the US would have their systems spot-checked by intelligence agencies.

      That said, in the end, it's pointless. If you buy 16,000 PCs, you can't check them all - not every bit of silicon. OTOH, any foreign intelligence agency couldn't know where the PCs would be deployed - unless they were all ordered under the same contract by the same US federal agency, or whether they would be deployed in a manner allowing access to the particular networks of interest.

      Blindly suggesting that inspection is unnecessary OR that it will be effective is just stupid.

      That said, exactly what would happen if Lenovo, a major Chinese company, were PROVED to be bugging their hardware for ANYBODY. They would go out of business in a heartbeat.

      Therefore the odds that this is being done - with Lenovo's cooperation, anyway - is likely to be zero. Which doesn't mean it might not be done WITHOUT Lenovo's knowledge, however - this is why spot checks would be useful.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    24. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Intron · · Score: 1

      Flash. When you rewrite the BIOS, there is no guarantee that you write to all of the bits since the software to do it is on the computer. A few K of code could hide out there easily. The only way to find it would be to take the chip off the motherboard.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    25. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Jaykul · · Score: 1

      * Send this information, alng with everything you were working on, to Microsoft for detailed analysis.

      --
      Anger is never without a reason, but seldom with a good one. -- Benjamin Franklin
    26. Re:Disagree on the last comment by hey! · · Score: 1

      (1) Factually, the computers are not being made in different placed than they were before or by different people. It should only be slightly easier for the Chinese to do this now that it's Lenovo and not "IBM PC Division."

      Very true. They should have been on the radar earlier.

      (2) Lets say that the Chinese were caught bugging computers -- it would be horrible public relations not only for Lenovo, which would lose some gigantic portion of its market share, but for the entire computer industry that manufactures overseas.

      Agreed, but I'm not sure a spook would react the same way a businessman would. A good dela of what they do would be horrible public relations -- if they got caught.

      (3) Considering the number of U.S. Citizens employed by Lenovo, what are the chances that none of them would clue in?

      That's neither here nor there. You don't send the PLA in in uniforms with big boxes labelled "Spy hardware" with all the workers looking on, even if all those workers were Chinese citzens. You do it sneakily, say replacing the hard drives with specially manufactured ones before they even reach the factory. If you do need an American citizen in on the scheme, which you probably don't, there are time tested methods for doing this.

      Much, much more complex and dangerous operations have been undertaken to gather intelligence than this would be. The point isn't to pick on the Chinese; Chinese government intelligence is more of a concern than, say, Al Qaeda operativs working out of Malaysia, because of their technological capabilities and scale.

      This is really just a play by the anti-globalization people who scored a success in the Dubai PortsWorld deal and now see national security as an effective tool in their fight.

      I agree the DPW was a huge bit of misdirection. Since everybody knows port security is important, and nobody outside of a handful of really technical people have any idea of what it means DPW was a proxy issue. Politicians hypocritically (Democrats) or cravenly (Republicans) used it to seek political brownie points.

      It may well be the Lenovo situation will get there as well, although it isn't there yet. Nobody has accused Lenovo, or China for that matter, of anything. But it should be a concern. Many coountries (**cough cough ** France ** cough cough **) have been known to engage in economic espionage, and there's no reason to suppose they wouldn't gather military or political intelligence as well. But like port security, there isn't an easy and cheap fix.

      Really, any procurements for sensitive military, political or economic applications should include a serious insepction of the supply chain and have provision for random sampling. I'd be especially concerned about mobile devices such as laptops or mobile phones. Anybody who's carrying a mobile phone could be a potential walking listening station.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    27. Re:Disagree on the last comment by yog · · Score: 1

      There's a total disconnect between economic and political realms. In the economic realm, the Chinese (with the technical and managerial assistance of the Taiwanese and Japanese and Americans) are turning a once-backward nation into an outsourcing superpower. In the political realm, the Chinese Communist Party runs the country in a Stalinist fashion, killing or arresting anyone who rocks the boat, be he a democracy activist or a Fa Lun Gong practitioner.

      As Stalin once said, "You have a man, you have a problem. No man, no problem." This is how the CCP keeps a lid on trouble in the country, albeit perhaps less homocidal today than Stalin was.

      The interesting thing is that this disconnect occurs on both sides of the Pacific. The Americans are still getting used to China as an economic giant; in most people's living memory, China was an economically incompetent, Cuba-like welfare state that was still recovering from the traumas of decades of war and depredation.

      But today China's past that, mostly, except for this legacy government which I believe is truly dangerous. They had a general talking openly about nuking Los Angeles just a few years ago. They're working on their own version of the sophisticated Aegis command-and-control system for their navy. They're stealing, buying, and copying American military technology as fast as they can, and they have purchased the latest submarines and fighter jets from the idiotic Russians, tipping the balance of power in the Taiwan Strait and the Pacific literally overnight. They have spoken of an ongoing project to hack into and shut down the American air traffic control system. Various entities engaged in hacking into U.S. defense systems have been traced to the China mainland. Who knows what kind of satellites they are designing and launching that may be designed to destroy U.S. tracking systems and global communications. And they point thermonuclear warheads at the U.S.

      So it's not particularly surprising or unusual that the American government is suspicious of sensitive electronics that it is purchasing from a Chinese owned company. After all, the Americans demonstrated the power of booby-trapping electronics when it shipped a bunch of hacked printers to Iraq and used them to remotely shut down the Iraqi communications systems during the first Gulf War.

      The difficulty is that in the economic realm, the U.S. and China are bosom buddies, joined at the hip, united as business partners. It's a strange situation and not one that can benefit the U.S. in the long run. in the short run, it's profitable, however.

      --
      it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
    28. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aagh! no! stop being defensive.

      No one is picking on China. You seem to agree that there is a security threat. Whether USA presents a security threat to China or anyone else is completely irrelevant.

      A potential security threat is being investigated. One more reason to hate Amerikkka...

    29. Re:Disagree on the last comment by John+Hurliman · · Score: 1

      The parent comment was only trying to state there is no reason to believe China wouldn't spy on the U.S., not that every government in the world is completely trustworthy except for China. And I don't think the Iran-Contra affair disproves this point.

    30. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this point, it would be impossible to buy a computer with non-chinese components in it.

      What are you going to do?

      Essentially, unless you made all the HW yourself, and wrote the OS and apps (and all the tools, including the compilers used to create themm, and the SW used for the HW manufacturing) you are SOL on absolute security.

      Doesn't mean they shouldn't go after the obvious. But then that just makes the "spies" that much more clever. And countries have deep pockets, when it comes to spying.

      The correct solution is to reduce the secret stuff you require in order to function.

      The more secrets you have, the more spies there will be. The more spies there are, the better the top ones will be. Basic supply and demand with a little Darwinism.

    31. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      Now that you mention it, I would really like to know if it is at all possible to purchase a fully "Made in the USA" computer

      Well, there's this one, but the parts are all made in Denmark.

    32. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You would think that the 'intelligence' community would keep this investigation very quiet until they had some hard evidence (i.e. had ripped apart new government laptops, found and analysed the bug devices -- and then used that information for counter intelligence).

      Instead they have made public accusations (excuse me ... announced an 'investigation') without presenting any evidence. Sounds like it is either a witch hunt, or more likely a propagaded campaign (probably for domestic consumption).

    33. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Bob3141592 · · Score: 1

      In light of all the spying that we did against the USSR (xerox copy machines, sabatoged oil line controls leading to an explosion, etc) and China (using Nauru's embassy, splices in the telecom, etc.) , we would be insane to not check the equipment. What amazes me is that over the last 5 years, our gov. has outsourced so many critical areas to nations that are at best neutral, and more likely future enemies.

      When will the gov't relearn that outsourcing is a national security issue? If there is ever a conflict and we're on a different side than Japan, how will we get the steel to build our equipment? If Sigapore is in enemy hands, where will we get the memory chips for our military electronics? Etc.

      War is a test of the economic strength of nations. The foundation of economic strength is industrial capacity. We have sacrificed our internal manufacturing abilities on the alter of short term corporate profits. Whatever strength the US has is superficial, and becoming thinner all the time. We desperately need to rebuild our internal strength.

      The US should be very wary of antagonizing the rest of the world. We are very dependant upon them for our survival.

      --
      In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
    34. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Funny, and most likely a valid Perl program as well. Bravo!

    35. Re:Disagree on the last comment by davidstrauss · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you're very comfortable in your LaRouchist illusions of a "physical economy", but industrial capacity largely depends on access to natural resources, and outsourcing doesn't change who has what natural resources. Being able to wage war when everyone's against you isn't a measure of economic strength; it's a measure of military strength. The only question we should ask of our economic changes is, "Are people living better lives now?"

    36. Re:Disagree on the last comment by macklin01 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd be just as concerned about industrial espionage. Nothing like using a well-entrenched business brand to phone home biomedical engineering research ... -- Paul

      --
      OpenSource.MathCancer.org: open source comp bio
    37. Re:Disagree on the last comment by wfberg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What amazes me is that over the last 5 years, our gov. has outsourced so many critical areas to nations that are at best neutral, and more likely future enemies.

      A cynic might take that to mean that the US is looking to make a lot more enemies.. Who am I kidding, the plans to invade my country have already been made, a bill was passed by Congress to invade The Hague in the event the International Criminal Court would ever attempt to try a USian.. SO yeah, I live in a future enemy State, despite being one of the strongest supporters of NATO....

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    38. Re:Disagree on the last comment by timmy+the+large · · Score: 1

      Who should they buy there pcs from? Almost every PC or laptop is atleast partially built in the PRC. Saying that we wont get any PCs from them is saying we wont get any PCs.

    39. Re:Disagree on the last comment by dslbrian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The reason for picking on China is xenophobia, plain, old and simple, dressed up in McCarthy era justifications around communism.

      Hardly. The fact is that China is really the only adversary who potentially has the military strength and intent to engage the US. North Korea and Taiwan are both problem areas where the Chinese and American viewpoints are very different. I'm sure European and Middle Eastern countries spy as well, but the US is not going to be invaded by Germany or Jordan.

      I'm sure China would just love to get a bunch of bugged PCs into places like the LLNL or NSA. Having a backdoor into the US labs developing missile defence systems would be their dream come true.

      Eventually the Taiwan problem is going to have to be resolved. I can see this happening either by the Chinese government eventually becoming more moderate (ideally becoming democratic, but more likely giving up on the hardline Taiwan stance), or by a military conflict (eventually their economic and military strength will reach a level where they will think they can do whatever they want - its just a matter of time). I imagine the hardliners see the latter as the road to "reunification", so its very much in their interest to spy all they can. Lenovo might just be another part of their effort.

    40. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Bob3141592 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you're very comfortable in your LaRouchist illusions of a "physical economy", but industrial capacity largely depends on access to natural resources, and outsourcing doesn't change who has what natural resources. Being able to wage war when everyone's against you isn't a measure of economic strength; it's a measure of military strength. The only question we should ask of our economic changes is, "Are people living better lives now?"

      Are you saying that America doesn't have any more natural resources? Did we use them all up already?

      I believe your simplistic view of military strength being disjoint from industrial capacity is very short sighted. Overwhelming force certainly has it's advantages, but it only applies in certain domains, and does not cover all aspects of warfare. Consider that our great dominance in military strength isn't able to win the peace in either Afghanistan or Iraq. And in a sustained conflict, where forces are more evenly matched, how can military strength be maintained for the duration of the conflict? That's an economic problem.

      As for people living better being the only question to ask, I guess that explains why the US gov't has maxxed out their credit "cards", and only manages to stay living the good life by applying for more credit cards. Unfortunately, living on credit cards as the gov't and so much of the population does is living in a house of cards, and we all know where that leads....

      --
      In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
    41. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Calyth · · Score: 1

      The Americans also did some pretty crasy and sneaky things, like Rhyolite (putting satellites to capture stray internal microwave Russian signals), and send subs to like Sea o Okhotsk and put taps in Russian military cable.
      If the Chinese suck a bunch of spy gear into Lenovo Thinkpads, the physical ones wouldn't be too hard to detect. They still need to send the information back, and you're pretty much going to find out if you stick it in a faraday cage and analyse all network and EMF signals. If they used software, you can probably just secure wipe the drive. I don't see how putting hardware or software in the laptop would escape easy detection. Afterall, they could just send a couple to the NSA just to see whether it leaks information.

    42. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There just has to be better uses of our intelligence community's time." Right, lets have them looking for weapons of mass destruction in Iran.

    43. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      Try the video BIOS.
      Should be lots and lots of room for stuff in rather non-obvious places.

    44. Re:Disagree on the last comment by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Not sure how you got marked up Interesting for sarcasm.

      I have no doubt that even Bush/reagan could NOT get America to go to war with EU(or any western European nation)/Canada/mexico/Japan/etc. You or other democracies would have to flat out attack us to enable our president to go to war against a western nation.

      China, OTH, is making plans to have a go at us (and EU as well). We have seen glimpses in some of the chinese wwriting and military sayings. If you read Pravda, you will find some more interesting thoughts against USA, but I seriously doubt that they would take us on. We have more in common, than opposing.

      Do not get me wrong. I know that my nation plans attacks against China all the time. I view it as a necessary evil. Keep in mind that the idea of trade is to tie nations together so that the ppl have local interest together. We saw that Canada's gov. got too out of hand and was voted out. The current republicans in America will likewise take a huge hit due to their deficits, lies, traitorism, coruption, etc. If you really want to see Americans vote out all of the politicians, just get all nations to quite trading with us until we change our pols; We would run them out instantly. Why? Because we, like you, depend heavily on other nations. But the issue is China; Their business ppl have no say in their gov. Hence, their gov. can and will do what it pleases. It is a threat to all.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    45. Re:Disagree on the last comment by manifoldronin · · Score: 1
      Absolutely there are human rights problems in China. More so than the US, IMHO. In terms of foreign policy I'm not so sure. What foreign policy does China exhibit a problem with? Invading Middle Eastern states, or objecting to invasions then doing nothing when they take place?
      OK, help me out here - how does pointing out something wrong with the US foreign policy prove that China is not problematic in terms of foreign policy?
      Well that's the crux. I live in China, and have done for the past 6 months or so, and in my work and personal life I have predominantly Chinese friends. It certainly has sone rough edges, but the US is regarded by most people as a successful country with extensive personal freedom (this is interpreted in one of 2 ways - the first being that 'Westerners' are more 'free with expression' the second that a richer economy allows one greater personal space, for example children can move out of home before marriage quite easily), good businesses (in a very admiring way), but has a somewhat autocratic government - ask a CEO, a student or a taxi driver, this is their usual reply. How about you spend some time over here (and check out some of my other posts for statements also stating that I live in China, if you don't believe it)?
      I often find it amusing (and offensive in some cases) that some Americans, after having lived in China for 6 months (in big cities no less), think that they can assert on things in China with qualifiers like "most people in China". I was born in China, grew up there, and lived there for 25 years. I read Chinese Web sites and communicate with my friends and family in China every day. And I still don't think I know what a lot (and I mean "a lot") of Chinese people think of things.

      As for what you hear from your friends, I'm sure it's true, and they meant what they said. But is it everything, or is it just the nice side? If you were asked "what do you think of China" by a Chinese friend of yours, would you tell him to his face that "I think there are lots of human rights problems in China?"

      So, no hard feelings, but, how about you really spend some time over there?

      --
      Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
    46. Re:Disagree on the last comment by anaesthetica · · Score: 1

      It's not xenophobia, it's politics. We do counterespionage on every country that spies on us, whether they're ostensibly threatening (Russia, China), ostensibly allies (Britain, Israel), or just plain frustrating (France). The public nature of this brouhaha over China is simply because of trade politics--Senators are once again using trade with China as a populist issue, drumming up a lot of hysteria, and trying to put pressure on the Chinese to allow their currency to float more (i.e. increase the yuan's value).

    47. Re:Disagree on the last comment by number6x · · Score: 1

      You are half right. Our Intelligence groups are too busy spying on their own citizens. So The NSA, the CIA and Military Intelligence groups have decided to outsource much of this work to Chinese subcontractors.

      Of Course many non-intelligence government workers are worried about the Chinese intelligence agencies using Chinese made PC's to spy on Americans, so The CIA, et all, had to make sure that our citizens and officials would be willing to accept laptops from China.

      So that is why they cooked up this investigation. The investigation will conclude that there is no way the Lenovo laptops could be used as spying devices, and they will all be given some high level sounding acronym to stamp them as 'approved'.

      Of course, the truth is that the laptops will be crammed full of spy technology. The spying on American citizens will be outsourced to the Chinese. And, of course, the CIA and NSA can get back to spending their time surfing Russian porn sites, Uhm, I mean collecting intelligence.

      The Chinese will be allowed to keep 10% of the data collected for their own use as payment for their services. :)

      If you think this is far fetched, you should look into the real purpose of the Glomar Challenger in the 70's and the press cover stories on searching for 'silicon nodules' on the sea floor use to give cover to the operation.

    48. Re:Disagree on the last comment by wfberg · · Score: 1

      You or other democracies would have to flat out attack us to enable our president to go to war against a western nation.

      No, just put a GI on trial. You do realize this has been written into law?

      China, OTH, is making plans to have a go at us (and EU as well). We have seen glimpses in some of the chinese wwriting and military sayings.

      If you take that kind of posturing seriously. They're only really interested in portraying their military might w.r.t. Taiwan.

      If you read Pravda, you will find some more interesting thoughts against USA, but I seriously doubt that they would take us on.

      You do realize that Pravda is a privately-owned tabloid rag these days? Only slightly more respectable than World Weekly News (and I *do* mean only slightly)?

      China, Russia, Iran, etc. have all been lashing out at the US in words for quite some time now. Those are empty words, and have been quite some time. Russia only posed a viable threat at the beginning of the cold war. But, if you choose to be paranoid about it, yeah, it can be scary.

      So far, you have "glimpses" of propaganda-based writings, articles in a tabloid rag, but on the US side an actual Act passed by Congress (and the Senate) that authorizes the use of military force by an expeditiary force to attack The Hague in the event of a GI being brought up on trial in the International Criminal Court - which happens to be recognized by every other civilized nation. And unlike China, Russia, etc., the US has proved many times that it is quite willing to use military force, even if it hurts their economic interests (if you remember, Iraq's oil production did falter, which was bad news for SUV owners and people with, well, heating).

      I'd say that paints a picture of the US where the US comes off as an agressor, and a serious risk, much more than those scary rogue nations (which lack capabilities to boot!).

      This is not to say that I'm some kind of rabid anti-Americanist. Or that I think the possibility of US invasion is anything but remote. But at the very least, the US writing actual laws to invade my country is, well.... Insulting. Worryingly indicative of seemingly endless arrogance.

      You might want to look at stuff like this from a slightly less US-centric point of view.

      The US maybe "the World's Policeman". But it's also the world's biggest bully.

      And its policymakers have no shortage of apologists.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    49. Re:Disagree on the last comment by JohnGalt123 · · Score: 1

      Gentlemen, It just isn't worth the time to agree or disagree. These are just administrative use machines. All sensitive data is processed on TEMPEST certified machines, using approved software, removable hard drives, etc. all certified by the NSA. The is just a "tempest in a teapot" argument for political purposes.

    50. Re:Disagree on the last comment by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Maybe I missed something. What law are you talking about? I have googled, but I am not coming up with anything. Please enlighten me.

      As to pravda, it is "private" owned, In the same vein as Fox News. They both dish up what their master's want.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    51. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Dretep · · Score: 0
      What amazes me is that over the last 5 years, our gov. has outsourced so many critical areas to nations that are at best neutral, and more likely future enemies.
      Isn't that what America does best? Train and arm neutral nations that later come back to bite them in the ass? Usama Bin Laden is a prime example, no?
    52. Re:Disagree on the last comment by c_woolley · · Score: 1

      We don't spy on the French any longer. Waste of time trying to figure them out.

      I've seen some pretty valid points made during these posts and some fairly ignorant ones too. I think the main thing people need to keep in focus here is that there are intel communities in every country except France (need people to be intelligent to begin with) and we all perform the basic function of intel gathering.

      China and the US have gone back and forth for YEARS with spying. We are just better at it and get caught a lot less often. The communist Russia era helped to create the best spying nations ever (US, Russia, England and Isreal). After the USSR became a non-communist country, we became more relaxed with our spy programs, but still retained very valuable lessons learned. China has a LONG way to go before they can match any of the above listed countries in our spy programs. Getting caught is just part of the risk, and they may have been caught. Still have to wait and see if this is even the situation. I don't blame them for trying. No one wants to get caught with their pants down when they could have known about a situation in advance, friend or foe. We all have obligations to protect our countries or to learn from someone else's mistakes.

    53. Re:Disagree on the last comment by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      It is still more politics than anything else. Some US ownad computer brander (does any company still manufacture computers in the US) is kicking up a stink because they lost out on a contract. How about all the chips already coming out of china, or the ODM notebooks brand name badged or the video cards or even worse the network cards.

      China also legally has source code for windows and office. The current administration supposed security focus is just marketing, scare the crap out of old people so that they will vote for you.

      All this story means is the Lenovo people were not paying enough money to the right people which allowed the competition to leverage their "er" caimpaign contributions, for maximum commercial advantage.

      Maybe, just maybe, they are waking up to the security risks but that will be hard to believe until a few more political bunko artists, grace the inside of US correctional service facilities upon a long term basis.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    54. Re:Disagree on the last comment by scm · · Score: 1

      the Servicemembers Protection Act of 2002

      http://www.state.gov/t/pm/rls/othr/misc/23425.htm

      sec 2008
      a) AUTHORITY- The President is authorized to use all means necessary and appropriate to bring about the release of any person described in subsection (b) who is being detained or imprisoned by, on behalf of, or at the request of the International Criminal Court.

      b) PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO BE FREED- The authority of subsection (a) shall extend to the following persons:

            1. Covered United States persons.

            2. Covered allied persons.

            3. Individuals detained or imprisoned for official actions taken while the individual was a covered United States person or a covered allied person, and in the case of a covered allied person, upon the request of such government.

    55. Re:Disagree on the last comment by chris_7d0h · · Score: 1

      I agree. Likewise should the US government forbid acquisition of any tools, machinery, parts, components or other tangible or intangible entities which might conceivably hide some kind of intelligence intercept mechanism if said items are not manufactured in full within the borders of the United States of America. It's simply not worth the risk.

      Come on, seriously.

      --
      In a society that believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda ~ Bill Durodié
    56. Re:Disagree on the last comment by budgenator · · Score: 1

      We got plans to invade every country on the face of the earth and a couple thousand that don't exsist, so don't feel special or anything.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    57. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

      Nicely dramatic. But instead of just writing witty retorts, try to think it through.

      There's a huge difference between a soup-to-nuts manufacturer that's completely under the control of a foreign government (remember, there is no true private enterprise under Communism) and a component supplier which provides individual pieces which must be incorporated into others' designs.

      It's much more difficult (and therefore more risky) for a component manufacturer to try to target government users than it is for a whole system manufacturer with direct GSA contracts.

      Remember that the U.S. Government does not usually buy crypto that has been produced overseas, and just put the brakes on the Snort acquisition. This sort of selective purchasing is not without precedent or reason. And until the government has finished their inquisition, it's very reasonable for them not to buy from Lenovo.

    58. Re:Disagree on the last comment by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      China has a LONG way to go before they can match any of the above listed countries in our spy programs.

      From the few public statements I've read about China's intelligence program, they concentrate less on ferreting out secret information & basically go for quantity - they basically suck in public (or easily-obtained) info from all over the world, have thousands (if not tens of thousands) of analysts work on it all, and basically do a human data mining operation looking for clues, patterns & trends which can help them guess what other countries are doing.

      Of course, that's just a "best guess" that I heard from an intelligence analyst's public statement, so I have no idea if that's what they really do. It seemed like a reasonable approach though, especially given China's historical abundance of highly-educated labor & bureacratic tendencies.

    59. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those in U.S. Goernment have a valid concern. There has been more than one instance in which China has been seen spying on U.S. industries and in government. In one case Chineese diplomats have been tossed out due to spying.

    60. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 2, Informative
      While I understand and in fact largely share your "anti-american" sentiment (any sane person is worried about the US government's evangelical neo-mccarthyism), you appear to go too far in your accommodation of China's totalitarian regime, as some people do when trying to find some counter-balance to the Bushites.

      The US continues to trade with and indeed support many despotic regimes, but at least they nominally support change towards more democracy. China on the other hand *prefers* to deal with despotic rulers. For instance, China vetoed UN intervention in the Darfur genocide as they had lucrative oil and business deals with the military regime there.

      The mad regime in North Korea only stays in power because Beijing finds it in their interests to prop it up for strategic reasons. Same with Burma.

      Chinese state-owned military companies have certainly "disseminated" nuclear and missile technology to other despotic regimes to win influence there, with the "father" of Pakistan's nuclear programme proliferating Chinese and North Korean technology further yet. Not to the democratic India though, which China sees as a strategic competitor to be contained (thus Chinese support to both Pakistan and Burma, and the invasion and militarization of occupied Tibet).

      While China isn't invading Middle Eastern states (yet?), it has *annexed* several neighboring states and peoples by military force (Tibetans, Uigurs and Mongols to name the most prominent ones). The expansionist policies of the most murderous dictator in human history, Mao Zedong, still persist and the dictator continues to be hailed as *the* national hero.

      Living in China for a short period (probably in the more liberal Han-Chinese areas as well) and having some Chinese friends doesn't necessarily give one any knowledge or insights into the policies of the ruling regime there. I have closely followed the developments in China, both from inside and outside, since the 1980s, besides having familiarized myself with their contemporary and dynastic history, and still don't consider myself as an expert on China. The vast majority of Chinese, however, only get to "learn" what their regime wants them to believe and never get to understand China's foreign policy in other than glorious patriotic terms.

      --

      Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

    61. Re:Disagree on the last comment by chris_7d0h · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll humor you. Let me elaborate my line of thought a bit.
      Firt off, most computer components are made outside the US (mainly in asia) in areas which are presently outside the control of the US government. Secondly, computer equipment is built by assembling a lot of parts which makes it very unlikely that a single system other than the most trivial example would be made up entirely of US components or circuitry.. I'd further put it forth as implausible that any buyer of high-tech goods would make the effort to and be willing to pay for a complete circuitry analysis of all components in the purchased goods.

      If this assumption is plausible, then it would lend to plenty of opportunity (even for a single components manufacturer) to add whatever logic or feature they want on the hardware (or even in combination with firmware, but the latter is more risky since SW analysis is cheaper than the equivalent for HW, thus more likely to be done). These "extra features" could include for example some logic on harddrives, the motherboard or anywhere where data passes through. Another "feature" to couple the intercept logic with could be a passive electro-magnetic receiver which upon receiving a certain radio signal (authentication) could enable a short distance transmission of for transferring intercepted data.

      The point I was trying to make was simply that there is no feasable way of protecting yourself against intelligence gathering if the adversary is intent on gaining your intel. Especially in "high-tech" there are countless of ways to gather intel covertly which today rival the tried and true approach of elisting services of people already having had their vetting and the proper clearance (insiders).

      --
      In a society that believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda ~ Bill Durodié
    62. Re:Disagree on the last comment by Thundercleets · · Score: 0

      Spies like us... Not to harp but you could say any PC/MAC with TPM/TCPA already is rooted. Who makes the TPM/TCPA chips, whp writes their code? TMT

    63. Re:Disagree on the last comment by wfberg · · Score: 1

      Maybe I missed something. What law are you talking about? I have googled, but I am not coming up with anything. Please enlighten me.

      Google for The Hague Invasion Act.

      first hit, second hit, with linkage to .gov site. The wikipedia article for "International Criminal Court" also links the "The Hague Invation Act" page.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    64. Re:Disagree on the last comment by c_woolley · · Score: 1

      Absolutely correct. Quantity over quality. It does pay off over time if you are able to collect enough pieces to complete the puzzle. This method was used LONG ago by other countries (starting near the 1700's). Not saying that China is using an outdated method, but it other methods have been greatly improved and created to replace this.

  2. So let me get this straight.. by trazom28 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We have a crapload of good PC Manufacturers here in the states, and our government instead orders 16,000 PCs from a Chinese manufacturer?

    --
    {} ------ When I think of a good sig, I'll put it here
    1. Re:So let me get this straight.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please list for me the PC's I can buy whose parts do not come from China or Taiwan.

    2. Re:So let me get this straight.. by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      The factories were already in China when the Thinkpad division was owned by IBM.

    3. Re:So let me get this straight.. by TheBogie · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's not that the parts come from China, it's that now the responsibility for keeping spyware type stuff off of the computer is China's. If they bought their computers from a domestic supplier, there would be at least one other entity checking these computers. Since the entire box now comes from China, it is necessary for the intelligence community to do the checking. This makes a lot of sense to me.

    4. Re:So let me get this straight.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of the components are already being produced in China or Taiwan anyway. The reality is that very few components in computers are made on US shores today. Its a lucky dip in many cases where the CPU in your system has come from. For example read the FAQ on the intel web page regarding where products are being produced and intel is one of the larger computer parts producers.

    5. Re:So let me get this straight.. by pieinthesky · · Score: 1
      "free trade! capitalism! competition!"

      ...but only when it benefits me.

    6. Re:So let me get this straight.. by hcob$ · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're looking for Blade Servers:

      Diversified Technology, Inc. Everything is designed and manufactured in-house. They even do custom projects.

      --
      Cliff Claven
      K.E.G. Party Chairman
      Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
    7. Re:So let me get this straight.. by a_nonamiss · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's OK, just as long as the PC's aren't made in any country with "Arab" in the name...

      --
      -Arthur
      Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
    8. Re:So let me get this straight.. by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      We have a crapload of good PC Manufacturers here in the states, and our government instead orders 16,000 PCs from a Chinese manufacturer?

      Well, first of all, we don't - outsourcing ended US PC manufacturing a long time ago. Even if it didn't, outsourcing of mobo's, hard drives, and most other components would make sure if there was some sort of monitoring agent put in there, you wouldn't know it.

      On another tack, it seems it's always the right wing who bitch about high taxes and 'guvmint wastin' our money' that also bitch about our security being broken by having to use all of these foreign boxes. The bottom line is that, in this global economy, if you want control, you pay for it.

      I guess my overall feeling is that the right wing free traders made this bed. They shouldn't whine about having to lie in it.

      --
      That is all.
    9. Re:So let me get this straight.. by trazom28 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      It's OK, just as long as the PC's aren't made in any country with "Arab" in the name...


      Way to be a racist! Go you!

      Translation: You're an asshat :)
      --
      {} ------ When I think of a good sig, I'll put it here
    10. Re:So let me get this straight.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only person to find it oxymoronic that a company called "Diversified Technology" supposedly does everything in-house?

      Like, yeah, that definitely diversifies your points of failure...

    11. Re:So let me get this straight.. by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      hmmm, I read the GP as sarcasm

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    12. Re:So let me get this straight.. by a_nonamiss · · Score: 1

      You tend to miss a lot of things, don't you...

      Don't feel bad... The comment got modded offtopic. Apparently, you're not the only one who can't appreciate my biting sarcasm. And whoever modded it down apparently doesn't see the parallels between this story and the Dubai Ports Authority story from a few weeks ago. (Country: United ARAB Emirates If they did, they would see that it's exactly on topic.

      For those who missed it, let me explain: We are xenophobic as a culture. We have these knee jerk reactions whenever we hear that someone from another country is providing services and get all freaked out. It happened a few weeks ago with the DPA deal, and it's happening with this deal. My point is that we need to start looking at these things logically, instead of having an emotional reaction and going with that. We should put every government laptop with sensitive information under a very keen microscope, not just the ones that come from China. Americans can be spies for the "enemy" too. The DPA deal got shot down by Congress, but government agents were still able to smuggle radiological material into the US without much effort at all.

      And in response of your accusation calling me a "racist asshat." You know nothing about me. You have nothing by which to judge whether or not I feel differently about people from other cultures. Before flinging such a strong accusation around, you really should have more to go on than a comment that went over your head.

      --
      -Arthur
      Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
    13. Re:So let me get this straight.. by trazom28 · · Score: 1

      Apologies for missing your /sarcasm in the post - and for the name calling. I was judging by your post, which I interpreted incorrectly. I just have no patience with racists, and I misread your comment.

      *offers handshake of apology*

      And you do have an excellent point - the Dubai Port deal was much ado about nothing, and I wish it would have gone through, if nothing else to show the general US Public that it was indeed no big deal.

      --
      {} ------ When I think of a good sig, I'll put it here
    14. Re:So let me get this straight.. by a_nonamiss · · Score: 1

      Spoken like a true gentleman. My hats off to you.

      I do not have much tolerance for racism, either. My wife is full Mexican, and while not not Arab, she is quite brown and is often mistaken for Arab. (We have been "randomly" put into the "special" line at the airport EVERY time I have flown since 9/11, I kid you not.) I understand that people sometimes misinterpret my cinicism. No hard feelings.

      --
      -Arthur
      Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
  3. Summary correction. by tpgp · · Score: 2, Funny

    The fear is of foreign intelligence applying pressure to Lenovo to equip its PCs so that the U.S. can be spied on."

    Should read:

    The fear is of the Chinese Trade Gap widening further

    Fixed! (Its a joke for the humour impaired)

    --
    My pics.
    1. Re:Summary correction. by Mathiasdm · · Score: 0
      Its a joke for the humour impaired

      Why would you make a joke for the humor impaired? //Yes, this is a joke as well.

      --
      Join the anonymous, help develop the network: http://www.i2p2.de
  4. If the US Govt is so worried about it... by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    ...why did they order the PCs from China in the first place? Didn't they know that their attempt to save a buck might end up in future unforeseen costs?

    Next time, but from US manufacturers! Let this be a lesson learned.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:If the US Govt is so worried about it... by chrismcdirty · · Score: 1

      I don't think they would save a buck buying from Lenovo, if they're still carrying the IBM price range. If they went with eMachines, on the other hand..

      --
      It's like sex, except I'm having it!
    2. Re:If the US Govt is so worried about it... by InsaneGeek · · Score: 1

      Probably because of the long term contracts the Gov has had with IBM for decades (with an S), Lenovo makes them for IBM and IBM than sells them to the Gov.

    3. Re:If the US Govt is so worried about it... by garcia · · Score: 2

      ...why did they order the PCs from China in the first place? Didn't they know that their attempt to save a buck might end up in future unforeseen costs?

      So that they can start planting the seeds of war with China. What better way to recoup all the money that we owe them but to go to war w/them for years so we don't have to pay it back?!

    4. Re:If the US Govt is so worried about it... by Xichekolas · · Score: 0

      This is how our government works... first you save 12 cents here and then you spend $12 Billion on something else... kind of like cutting a few million from the Peace Corps in the name of fiscal responsibilty and then asking for another $80 billion for Iraq... I can't help but wonder what the world would be like if we gave $80 billion to the Peace Corps... Yeah, probably just get wasted on hippy love projects anyway... w00t JDAMs!

      --

      Self-referential Sigs are cool on /. these days...

      54

    5. Re:If the US Govt is so worried about it... by digitaldc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, probably just get wasted on hippy love projects anyway...

      Unfortunately, most hippy love projects lead to jealousy-induced breakups and infighting.

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    6. Re:If the US Govt is so worried about it... by Xichekolas · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the Democratic Party!

      --

      Self-referential Sigs are cool on /. these days...

      54

    7. Re:If the US Govt is so worried about it... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Interesting. In the last century, losing a war with the USA was a good way of getting your country's economy back on a strong footing. Maybe losing a war with China will do the same for you this century...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  5. of course they're used for spying by Dishwasha · · Score: 1

    They must have pre-loaded them with Microsoft Windows.

  6. I think not. by biggyfred · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Better use of intelligence time? This should be taken damned seriously. Have a look at PROMIS and tell me this is a benign subject..

    1. Re:I think not. by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      um. Didn't this company make all the Thinkpads? Do you realize that almost ALL laptops are made by Chinese companies? Aren't you all a little late to worry about foreign companies making our equipment? Profit overrules, doesn't it? No unions, no environmental regulations, workers working for pennies an hour, isn't that the whole point of the last ten years? Corporate duty is to make profit only, not worry about people or national interests, no?

      It sounds to me like the usual suspects in the U.S. right are trying to generate a Great Enemy again, after the nitwits in caves in Pakistan didn't rise to the challenge. Gotta have something for all that military and intelligence apparatus to do, something to spend all those trillions on. Otherwise, if we aren't at war with some Great Enemy, people might wonder why we're gearing up for an eternal world war if no one wants to hurt us.

    2. Re:I think not. by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      FWIW. Thinkpads used to be made in Ireland.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    3. Re:I think not. by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      My older Compaq Armada (E700) was made in Singapore.

      The larger issue is this:

      Given our military's dependence on semicondoctor technology, what is to happen if they are now dependant on Chinese manufacturers? Can't really go to war on China then, can you?

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    4. Re:I think not. by KingEomer · · Score: 1

      And what if China became dependent on us? Then they couldn't go to war with us either. Is this a bad thing?

    5. Re:I think not. by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      No it is not a bad thing. It is just an interesting thought and moves warefare into the realm of more subtle economic areas.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  7. MicroSoft by bombadillo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This isn't much different than the Chineese Governments fear of backdoors placed in M.S. Windows by U.S intellegence. The shoe is on the other foot now.

    1. Re:MicroSoft by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      I love it when perfectly valid comments get marked 'troll.' :-/

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:MicroSoft by dominator · · Score: 2, Informative

      And Microsoft gave into the Chinese government's demands and released their source code so that it could be audited. This is just the cost of doing business with powerful governments with large budgets. Lenovo should, like Microsoft, suck it up, or lose the US government's business. Turnabout is fair play, after all...

    3. Re:MicroSoft by yellekc · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, the Chinese got that covered. The US intellegence community would be mighty confused and overwhelmed when the backdoor they put on a 100 copies of windows ends up being installed on half a million PCs.

    4. Re:MicroSoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't much different than the Slashdot fear of backdoors placed in M.S. Windows by M.S. incompetence. The shoe is in their mouth now.

  8. Supposition and Speculation by Billosaur · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The supposed problem presented by the USCC is that the 16,000 computers are being built by a Chinese-mainland company. The USCC argues that a foreign intelligence like that of the Communist Party of China (CPC) can use its power to get Lenovo to equip its machines with espionage devices. Lenovo has strongly declined that it is involved in any such activities.

    On the one hand, they have a point: it would be very easy for the Chinese government to "encourage" Lenovo to plant things in these machines to allow them to spy on the US. On the other hand, given the profusion of malware, keyloggers, Trojans, and such, the Chinese government could already be spying on the US without having to go to such extraordinary lengths. Frankly, it's too obvious to be credible.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:Supposition and Speculation by George+Beech · · Score: 1

      Frankly, it's too obvious to be credible.
      That is the attitude that makes something done in this manner work oh so well.

    2. Re:Supposition and Speculation by genghis_1971 · · Score: 1

      I Totally agree! Spying with physical, hard-coded equipment is far too inflexible to be effective. It would be discovered easily and could be used as a roadmap to a Chinese spy agency or as a channel to send misinformation. Then again we are talking about a government and governments, Chinese or otherwise, don't always make wise decisions.

    3. Re:Supposition and Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      perl -e "print qq|I'd have to be pretty dumb to execute sig code!\n|;"
      This only works on chs, to make it bash/sh proof, add a \ before the !:
      perl -e "print qq|I'd have to be pretty dumb to execute sig code\!\n|;"
      This works both in sh/bash and in csh.
  9. Better use? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    How do you figure? Isn't this what they should *actually* be doing, so we make rational decisions instead of using kneejerk racisim to eliminate foreign business? They should investigate, so we can base decisions on facts for a change.

    1. Re:Better use? by externarmor · · Score: 0, Troll

      Your are so right. A country that is mostly white should never defend itself from a country that is mostly people with skin color. It was okay to defend ourselves from the Soviet Union because they were mostly white. It is kneejerk racism to protect ourselves from China because they are Asians.

    2. Re:Better use? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      You seem to think I'm saying exactly the opposite of what I said.

    3. Re:Better use? by externarmor · · Score: 0

      My point is you shouldn't play the "kneejerk racism" card every time one side of the conflict is a majority of one race. For you to make that assumption makes you the racist by automatically assuming the intentions of that side based on its predominant race.

    4. Re:Better use? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      For you to make that assumption makes you the racist by automatically assuming the intentions of that side based on its predominant race.

      You seriously need a lesson in reading comprehension I think.

    5. Re:Better use? by externarmor · · Score: 0

      instead of using kneejerk racisim to eliminate foreign business.

      I was responding to this part of your statement. BTW, you misspelled racism.

    6. Re:Better use? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Yes, you were, and in context it doesn't mean what you're implying it means.

      You said:

      you shouldn't play the "kneejerk racism" card every time one side of the conflict is a majority of one race

      Which doesn't make any sense really, since there's no conflict. We're discussing the difference between making informed decisions, or making a one sided judgement (there has to be at least two involved parties for conflict, BTW) based solely on the fact that somebody (or some corporation) is foreign.

      I don't understand how you make the leap from there to what I said being an assumption that somebody was racist. Show me where I assumed or accused anybody of anything other than not thinking through the alternative when making a flipant comment.

    7. Re:Better use? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Oh, and yes... I spelled flippant wrong too... Oops. It was a typo.

  10. TV, and DVD Players May Listen Too! by blueZhift · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hmmm, with so many goods coming from China these days, your TV and DVD player may be spying on you too, or in the near future, especially with the growth of home networks. Seriously, trying to buy any kind of electronics that don't come from China is getting harder and harder. Do it yourselfers aren't much safer, afterall, would anyone notice if the network chip on that Chinese made motherboard have some extra functionality? My, isn't paranoia fun?

    1. Re:TV, and DVD Players May Listen Too! by Clueless+Nick · · Score: 1

      Hmm, then maybe people should reconsider shooting their 'wives'/girlfriends/themselves on that cheap cam...?

      But seriously, people, the shoe IS actually on the other foot this time, what with the US government holding the devil's keys to every encryption algorithm originating in the US, and God knows access to what backdoors on your shiny, proprietary software!

      This is the reason why the Chinese Government has encouraged Red Flag. And they have the means and the will to ensure its success.

      Increasingly, the American people and their rulers are being perceived to be paranoid. As the old wisdome goes, in a free society, only those with something to hide will keep their windows closed. No pun intended.

      -clueless

      --
      Chat with other atheists http://secularchat.org
  11. Not Surprised by kannibal_klown · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They spy on us, and we spy on them. Nothing new.

    The only thing is now they're worried that the Chinese gov got a PC supplier to fiddle with their product. Maybe not all, just 1 out of 100 or something.

    Do I think China did this? No.

    But it's pretty much the job of intelligence agencies to be paranoid.

    1. Re:Not Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If anyone has attended a presentation by Lenovo, they are VERY big into the Trusted Platform Module (TPM). The chip they use is supposedly unerasable, at least outside the factory anyway. So no flashes are possible. The only way they say they can change the config is by replacing the actual chip.

      And of course, what's available from that chip varies depending on the features you buy. They could make i

      At any rate, it's entirely plausible that they could put a backdoor into the TPM chip could have a backdoor in it that the Chinese could use to spy on the government and even US companies. Very likely could be undetectable. Or if it was detected, not much could be done about it short of junking the laptop.

      Sure, leakage of this could cause Lenovo to lose business. The whole point is that it's kept on the downlow, because is a source is exposed, it'll dry up.

      Not only does it make business sense to keep it quiet, it'll also lose the Chinese gov't a potentially lucrative source of intelligence.

  12. If you need real security by Rhys · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And you didn't install the OS yourself from something "known good" (or at least believed good, like a generic windows install CD bought at best buy or your other favorite local rip-off shop) you're an idiot.

    Beyond that, by talking about it, you've given "the enemy" information on how your IT practices work: you pretty obviously don't use ghost or any similar sort of mass deployment software. (yes, I realize that for laptops with all their custom crap it doesn't work as well. Still, a place I worked as a summer intern used to do it back in the 96-2000 era on IBM thinkpads, so...)

    Security by obscurity? Sure. That is all your password is, after all too, it (sec by obs) isn't strictly a bad thing.

    --
    Slashdot Patriotism: We Support our Dupes!
    1. Re:If you need real security by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      I believe the expected "bug" would be hardware, not software.

    2. Re:If you need real security by chill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And you didn't install the OS yourself from something "known good" (or at least believed good, like a generic windows install CD bought at best buy or your other favorite local rip-off shop) you're an idiot.

      Irrelevant.

      BIOS has gotten to the point that it can "phone home" before you even get to the OS. A small modification to hardware or firmware can make it so the system inserts key packets into the network stream, sending covert messages out to the equivalent of electronic "dead drops".

      We aren't talking about always-on-a-secure-network PCs, but laptops that'll be jacked into hotels, Starbucks and other insecure networks at some point.

      Unless you jack those machines in behind a traffic analyzer/router that captures every packet, then analyze *each* packet that goes out of the machine, you'll never be 100% sure the hardware isn't trojaned.

      Ping is nice and innocuous. Are you sure you know what that 56-byte payload contains? Have you ever looked? What about DNS requests? They happen ALL the time. Did you analyze each one to make sure they aren't requesting TXT-records that get forwarded over to a Chinese-owned server in the U.S.?

        -Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:If you need real security by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1
      Security by obscurity? Sure. That is all your password is, after all too, it (sec by obs) isn't strictly a bad thing.

      The difference between a secret password and a "secret" IT practice is that the password can be changed easily if the secret is revealed. Bruce Schneier calls this "brittle" secrets vs. resilient secrets, e.g. a lock with a key or combination (which can be changed) vs. the location of a secret door (which would be difficuilt to relocate).

      Also, don't overlook the possibility that potential "bugs" in computers could be the more traditional hardware listening devices instead of/in addition to spyware.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    4. Re:If you need real security by Sique · · Score: 1
      Security by obscurity? Sure. That is all your password is, after all too, it (sec by obs) isn't strictly a bad thing.


      Security by obscurity isn't about existing secrets (hey, if you encrypt something, then you also obscure the contents and hope for security).
      Security by obscurity means: We don't tell anyone how it works, so they will have a hard time figuring that out first until they can get in. Security by obscurity means: Putting the key under the doormat, so no one knows where the secret (the actual unique design of the key) is, and don't tell anyone that this key fits to the backdoor, not the front door.
      Security by obscurity is defeated by lifting the obscurity, not by revealing the secrets.
      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    5. Re:If you need real security by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      you pretty obviously don't use ghost or any similar sort of mass deployment software

      Agreed. Maybe Roadhouse or any other Patrick Swayze film, but not Ghost.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    6. Re:If you need real security by mudshark · · Score: 1

      Ping *looks* nice and innocuous, so you say. Small, yellow, and fuzzy, with webbed feet....

      Think about it, folks. The Story About Ping is set in CHINA!!!

      --
      In other news, astrophysicists have announced that they now know what all that dark matter is: it's stupidity.
  13. I doubt it by e**(i+pi)-1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Any built-in addition features in the hardware, the bios or
    even the preinstalled operating system would be immediately
    detected and destroy the entire PC business of Lenovo abroad.

    1. Re:I doubt it by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      Not nessicarily,

      Not too long ago, Boeing sold a couple 747's to the Chinese government to be used for government officials. The Chinese found out they were loaded with listening devices. They bought a couple Airbuses for the Chinese officials instead, but it didn't effect the sale of Boeing planes to airlines and such that aren't worried about spying.

    2. Re:I doubt it by lhorn · · Score: 1

      Well, let's see how Sonys entire music distribution business collapse as a result of their additional built-in features first.

      --
      accept no limits but time
    3. Re:I doubt it by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Immediately detected?

      Some counterexamples include the Sony rootkit, which was shipping for most of a year before being caught and wasn't even that cleverly coded, and Interbase, which went six or seven years before anyone noticed the back door login. Or of course the brilliant Ken Thompson backdoor in /bin/login.

      The problem with this investigation is that PCs shouldn't be trusted anyway. Does anyone think that an intelligence agency couldn't develop, or spend a thousand dollars to buy, a zero-day Windows vulnerability?

    4. Re:I doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think? Right now, U.S. technology firms are building "Trusted Computing" into their new PCs (also known as TCPA, or TCG hardware). This allows them to hide software behind walls of encryption that cannot be accessed by you. You can't put a debugger on the code to see what it does because the instructions are only unencrypted within the processor and memory is curtained to ensure that anything untrusted (you) cannot peer into it.

      You do not have the key necessary to open this lock. Only Microsoft/Intel/IBM/Sun/Apple will have it. You won't know what's happening on your own computer it could, quite literally, be doing anything. Naturally this will be used for DRM, but it's also wide open for those companies to install software they want to force you to use, remove software they don't like... or only let you connect to website if you are running approved software... or lock your data to their own applications. Naturally, it is also quite possible for them to spy using it too. You will never know.

      Far from being worried about Lenovo, I'm more worried about U.S. PC big brother.

    5. Re:I doubt it by bagsc · · Score: 1

      And not adding in those features would result in the manager/engineer being detected and destroyed in China...

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    6. Re:I doubt it by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      Any built-in addition features in the hardware, the bios or
      even the preinstalled operating system would be immediately
      detected and destroy the entire PC business of Lenovo abroad.


      I don't think you've thought about this very much, or understand what you just said. How are you going to immediately detect very subtle changes to an IC? Are you superman?

      You can't SEE them, and they will be deliberately trying to cover their tracks.

      Something like this would actually be very, very hard do detect.

      The hardware would be designed to appear normal during things like POST, checksums, etc. Putting no more than five minutes of thought into the subject I can already think of some things to do that would make it very difficult to detect.

      Here's a simple example:

      Your keyboard has an IC in it. This IC could be modified to record the last 10,000 keystrokes to internal memory. This data would then only be accessible when the proper 1024 bit key was input via the keyboard matrix. It is simply mot possible to detect this without opening the chip.

      Do you routinely depackage ICs in your PC and examine them under an electron microscope?

      You've also made the poor assumption that Lenovo's cooperation with the Chinese gov't would have to be voluatry. For all we know, the Chinese gov't could have approached a few key people and said "Do what we say or it's off to re-education."

      I'm not saying it's definately happening, but dismissing it out of hand is naive. Read about some of the spying techniques we used during the cold war.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
  14. This makes perfect sense by JamesD_UK · · Score: 2, Funny

    After all, it'd be so easy to find a PC that didn't have any components made in China. Where's the sarcasm tag? :-)

    1. Re:This makes perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here? ;)</sarcasm>

      But seriously, I was gonna say the same. Now your chinese hardware is also assembled in China (versus chinese hardware assembled somewhere else). Big difference.

      Completely paranoid. Something like this would likely get noticed quite fast. Different motherboards/hardware, or from suspicious network traffic or security scans of the network, or whatever else.

      And then the day it's discovered to be true, Lenovo's sales drop by 99% overnight - killing the recently bought and expensive business (makes perfect business sense, doesn't it?). Nobody would trust them (or the chinese in general) anymore for anything.

  15. US and Due Dilligence... WHA???? by hcob$ · · Score: 1

    About time we started puting some of that security-conciousness into effect. Honestly, I think any foreign manufacuterer of devices with data logging capability should be HIGHLY suspect from the get-go.

    --
    Cliff Claven
    K.E.G. Party Chairman
    Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
  16. Better use of time? by Klaruz · · Score: 1

    While there's a good chance this probe will find nothing, espionage is still alive and well. The world as not nearly as peaceful as we'd like to think it is. Have you ever seen xray photos of electronics with bugs embeded in them? They do exist.

  17. Just a stunt by orzetto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The USCC is an organ of the US Congress. These are the members. If I understand correctly, they are all politicians. Chinese do things cheaper than Americans, American politicians whine so they look like they are against outsourcing, then they buy happily.

    Seriously, bugging thousands of PCs to get intelligence? Give me a break. Intelligence is not just about getting information, it is also about not getting caught and leaving no evidence. Thousands of PCs trying to send coded messages to Beijing would ring a bell even at the Department of Homeland Security. It's much simpler and safer to buy or blackmail a politician or an employee to provide information.

    --
    Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    1. Re:Just a stunt by Detritus · · Score: 1

      You aren't thinking like an intelligence agency. There are subtle ways that hardware can be modified that are hard to detect. Many of these techniques have been known for decades. They can be designed to be deniable. You don't have to collect information from all of the PCs, just the ones that have been installed in interesting places.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  18. Why doe there "There just has to be better uses".. by MajorDick · · Score: 1

    There just has to be better uses of our intelligence .
    WHY ???
    You dont think the Chineese would do this ?
    Does anyone remeber our com plane and its pilots ?
    The Chineese wouldnt even think twice about doing something like this. They would do it hands down.
    Shit WE would do it, and we did, look at all the games we played with the russians, bugged photocopiers for example.
    You seem like a plant , or a way to trusting soul to be on slashdot

  19. Try and find a computer not made in China by OS24Ever · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dell, HP, IBM, Apple, and many, many others are most of the time built right next to each other in China. I'd be willing to bet there isn't a single computer where every piece in it is made in the USA, or a US Friendly country (friendly by my definition = NATO)

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    1. Re:Try and find a computer not made in China by towsonu2003 · · Score: 1
      friendly by my definition = NATO
      That's an insightful definition, especially when one considers the anti-globalist critics of NATO and the US.
    2. Re:Try and find a computer not made in China by hcob$ · · Score: 1
      I'd be willing to bet there isn't a single computer where every piece in it is made in the USA, or a US Friendly country (friendly by my definition = NATO)
      I'll Take that bet. From a previous post of mine:

      If you're looking for Blade Servers:

      Diversified Technology, Inc. Everything is designed and manufactured in-house. They even do custom projects.
      --
      Cliff Claven
      K.E.G. Party Chairman
      Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
    3. Re:Try and find a computer not made in China by DoubleD · · Score: 1

      Insight into the build of a dell

      http://www.impactlab.com/modules.php?name=News&fil e=print&sid=5338>

      "Dell has six factories around the world - in Limerick, Ireland; Xiamen, China; Eldorado do Sul, Brazil; Nashville, Tennessee; Austin, Texas; and Penang, Malaysia"

      Interestingly enough there are actually 2 factories in the USA. The rest of the article has a very intersting look at what goes into a dell notebook.

      --
      "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep in order to gain what he cannot lose."
    4. Re:Try and find a computer not made in China by sbrown123 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about "made" in the USA but there are plenty of computers "assembled" in the USA. The United States is not a 100% free trade market player (no country is), so there are tariffs and costs to shipping in a complete product compared to just getting parts. China is the same. Try starting a business there, you will find that you have to have a shop in China doing x% of your business to the country. It's a good idea that the U.S. should do for ALL trades since it does the following:

      1. Slows growth of trade defiticits, or even makes it decline
      2. Creates new local jobs

      Bad effects:

      1. Product increase in price. The Walmartians will scream in horror when they can't buy the latest cheap electronic garbage from Tiawan to replace the unit they bought two weeks early that broke. Oh Well.

    5. Re:Try and find a computer not made in China by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      Then they don't use hard drives, processors, and memory chips. There are pieces they use to make their bigger pieces, and they're made overseas.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    6. Re:Try and find a computer not made in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Highly doubtful. Maybe design and assembly, but the components almost definately come from overseas. At the very least you could argue that Intel has a plant in China.

    7. Re:Try and find a computer not made in China by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      Diversified Technology, Inc. Everything is designed and manufactured in-house. They even do custom projects.

      Not true, their website clearly shows that they buy from Intel. Chances are these computers probably use RAM, etc as well.

      The point is, they don't make all the parts. They do the assembly and design here, but the parts come from elsewhere.

      If we went to war with China tomorrow, these guys would be missing their compenents.

      I don't think that an all us-made computer is impossible, but it would certainly be very difficult.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    8. Re:Try and find a computer not made in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New computers will be clean, as the tempest game would expose attempted stupidity.

      Opportunites only exist when something breaks, or a replacement part is needed, allowing the insertion of a technician, or something in the packaging, or some twit who sends it 'out' for exchange in order to claim a warranty. Which is why all domestic after-sales service shops look the same, and do not fold in high cost areas - even when they loose money. Who created all these recalls for power supplies and battery packs? Perfect for getting something in.

      Windows still has plenty of unpublished 'holes', so no changes need be made, and the AV vendors are full of foreigners, so its business as usual.

  20. Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    After basically ignoring the fact that Hughes transferred critical missile technology to China, NOW the government is worried about a few PC's used to spy on us?

    All the Chinese have to do is pony up a few bucks to any greedy US corporation and they can get the data much easier!

    1. Re:Hilarious by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      The Hughes thing had approval from the President.

    2. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From:
      http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/1/14 /143258.shtml

      Hughes CEO Michael Armstrong wrote President Clinton in 1993 threatening to pull support for Clinton if he did not allow the space technology transfers to China. In 1994, Clinton approved a waiver for Hughes to transfer advanced satellite encryption systems to China.

      As I said, pony up a few bucks to any greedy US corporation and they can get the data much easier! Approved by the president or not, this was driven by corporate greed overiding any sense of national security.

    3. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing like Clinton's corruption to help China along in acquiring sensitive technology, rather than stealing it as their modus operandi.

  21. Not the best direction... by MECC · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised that more foreign goverments aren't calling for similar investigations of US-based suppliers of IT resources to other goverments. This move, even if justified, seems to take things in a bad direction for all.

    Anyway, wouldn't outsorcing to other countries have some similar exposures?

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
    1. Re:Not the best direction... by Ajehals · · Score: 1

      Personlly I think foreign governments are smart enough to do the ckecks without making a fuss or going public about it. Do you seriously think that the UK, Germany, France, Russia et al dont look at US made products that they use in sensitive areas? The stupid part on this is that the US isnt just doing this quietly. Counter-espionage, just like Espionage works best when people dont know about it. - Especially against a "Friendly" power.

  22. What goes around could come around . . . by fajoli · · Score: 1

    Given the concern expressed by the US in starting this investigation, should the Chinese government be as concerned with US software? What would be the reprecussions of the Chinese government investigating US software companies for possible spying?

  23. Well no wonder.... by numbski · · Score: 1

    I mean, look at what they've been up to:

    http://digg.com/technology/_Help_me_Obi_Wan_Kenobi _Rocket_Boosters_Batman-esque_armor_plating_

    At best they've been spying on Bruce Wayne, Clark Kent, and Obi-Wan. Down with the bastahds. :P

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  24. Everyone has spies here. by C10H14N2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hell, no doubt even Canada has a few.

    1. Re:Everyone has spies here. by flyingsquid · · Score: 2, Funny
      Hell, no doubt even Canada has a few.

      Canada would never spy on the U.S. As an employee of the CIA, I can assure you that you have no idea what you're talking aboot, eh?

    2. Re:Everyone has spies here. by 9mm+Censor · · Score: 3, Funny

      Canada does. http://www.csis-scrs.gc.ca/ But they tend to lose Secret documents at hockey games, and their idea of tourture is feeding people poutine until they risk cardiac arrest before rushing them to the hospital for free health care, feeling sorry and giving people Citizenship for any hardship they faced, then calling it a day and going to drink beer and watch hockey.

  25. There is a very good word for this phenomena: by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Xenophobia.

    I have nothing further to add, because that word sums it all up. While there are valid threats against the USA and in the intelligence community there are measures to tap into restricted data, they are NOT going to mess with PCs for fuck's sake! If someone has high security requirements that entity is not going to buy from a consumer level shop ANYWAY.

    Geez.

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
    1. Re:There is a very good word for this phenomena: by nmos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      they are NOT going to mess with PCs for fuck's sake! If someone has high security requirements that entity is not going to buy from a consumer level shop ANYWAY.

      So you're saying that the sensitive departments of the US government custom builds their own desktops and laptops? Have a reference?

    2. Re:There is a very good word for this phenomena: by Myen · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? Because my first thought was that what is really happening is that some US-owned laptop-branding company wants in on the pie. Just kick out all the Chinese-owned companies, and you suddenly have fewer competitors. Including the one with a long contract.

      Note that I used "branding" - most likely, everybody makes their laptops in China (or some other non-USA country). But, hey, at least the company isn't Chinese-owned, even if all the people involved are equivalent, right?

      I hope it's just me getting cynical...

    3. Re:There is a very good word for this phenomena: by hcob$ · · Score: 1
      Xenophobia.

      I have nothing further to add, because that word sums it all up. While there are valid threats against the USA and in the intelligence community there are measures to tap into restricted data, they are NOT going to mess with PCs for fuck's sake! If someone has high security requirements that entity is not going to buy from a consumer level shop ANYWAY.

      Geez.
      I have two words that are a more accurate description: "Due Dillegence"
      --
      Cliff Claven
      K.E.G. Party Chairman
      Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
    4. Re:There is a very good word for this phenomena: by finnif · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ya know, you say that like it's a bad thing, but maybe we need to be a little more xenophobic.

      Our steel industry is completely decimated now. We barely make any heavy machinery in the United States. God forbid we actually ever get into a real war against the countries we've outsourced these things to.

      Besides that, xenophobia is good for business. Look at the Japanese.... no one can sell electronics to them except Japanese. It's a guaranteed lock that the new Nintendo and Playstation boxes will do well in Japan even if the Xbox 360 is #1 everywhere else in the world. Yet we talk about xenophobia like it's a bad thing? Maybe the US would do better if we actually stopped buying everything at Wal-Mart, your discount Chinese offshored manufacturing headquarters.

    5. Re:There is a very good word for this phenomena: by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      Probably referring to companies like Grid Systems which sell Tempest-certified systems to the government.

    6. Re:There is a very good word for this phenomena: by pilkul · · Score: 1
      Our steel industry is completely decimated now. We barely make any heavy machinery in the United States. God forbid we actually ever get into a real war against the countries we've outsourced these things to.

      Ah yes, the classic protectionist defense argument. How can you make this claim when, whatever difficulties U.S. ground troops may have, U.S. naval and air domination is absolutely overwhelming? According to this, the U.S. navy is the world's largest navy with a tonnage greater than 17 of the next largest world navies combined! Shipping lanes are thus guaranteed to remain open in the event of a war, and there will certainly remain enough allies to provide the necessary production.

      This argument also underestimates the capability of countries to very rapidly switch their focus of production in the event of a war, which has been seen several times in history.

    7. Re:There is a very good word for this phenomena: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The U.S. supremacy lies mostly in "blow shit up." When you move from "blow shit up" to "occupy foreign lands" you need a constant stream of supplies for ground troops. If the U.S. were ever to go to war with China not only would its military capacity become an issue, but the entire domestic economy would have to go with "WTF?" as the prices of most goods skyrocketed. China is quickly becoming the production center of all first-world powers, including all of the allies you expect to be there to supply the U.S. with all of the equipment it requires. The U.S. doesn't have the facilities or the workforce to simply adjust its economy to producing consumer electronics and machinery. You don't just go, "Welp, time to start producing RAM because Taiwan and Singapore are smoking craters." You betray an impressive display of ignorance of industrial engineering.

    8. Re:There is a very good word for this phenomena: by finnif · · Score: 1

      This argument also underestimates the capability of countries to very rapidly switch their focus of production in the event of a war, which has been seen several times in history.

      Yes, this is true. GM was able to convert their auto plants into tank factories relatively closely. However, never in history has a country had basic materials outsourced to the point that we do today.

      Anyway, I don't really think of myself as a "classic" protectionist. Though everyone likes to label everyone else in extreme camps, I actually think that globalism could lead to more peace than we've ever had in history (think Jensen's speech in the movie Network -- ok that's extreme). But the bottom line is that there's no guarantee that other countries are going to play by the rules we set up. Globalism means counting on everyone else to be slave to the financial implications of doing bad things... sometimes that just isn't true.

    9. Re:There is a very good word for this phenomena: by pilkul · · Score: 1

      Your argument would have value if there was a possibility that China might suddenly go ballistic tomorrow and start nuking everybody (Taiwan and Singapore become "smoking craters"? What?), but that isn't on the cards. I might be made to support more protectionist military production if tensions with China gradually increased to the point where large-scale war seemed like a possibility, but this just isn't the case right now. By "very rapid" change of production, I don't mean overnight, I mean in the space of months. While I indeed know little about industrial engineering (this is "impressive" to you? what, you expect anyone outside of industrial engineers to spend their days reading about this stuff?), you seem to know little about international diplomacy.

    10. Re:There is a very good word for this phenomena: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dateline 6 mo from now:

      "In a major discovery, company X from country Y has been building in snooping technologies into it's equipment. While present in all hardware as a 'backdoor' it is only activated when desired; and is speculated to have had big security leaks at major corporations and goverment agencies that have used this consumer equipment. When this station talked with an expert from slashdot, he/she was quoted as saying: "Why didn't our government protect us? Isn't it their job to make sure nobody could get away with this? We've been completely failed by our politicians"

      I'm pretty fed up with this blame game. Damned if you do, damned if you miss. Witness 911. I don't approve of violating personal freedoms (which is happening) but anyone that thinks you can make a blanket good/bad statement on this kind of stuff is ridiculously simplistic and childish. Even good people do bad, and bad people do good.

    11. Re:There is a very good word for this phenomena: by pilkul · · Score: 1
      Okay, it's easy to assume too much about someone's position from a single post.

      Globalism means counting on everyone else to be slave to the financial implications of doing bad things... sometimes that just isn't true.

      I do agree with this sentiment in theory, but I don't see that it applies at the moment. Why wouldn't most countries go ahead and do what's in their economic interest? There are serious downsides to protectionism (aside from the obvious economic harm, trade bickering can lead to increased tensions which might lead to precisely the military conflicts you are concerned about) and a reasonable decision must be made by weighing the alternatives based on how damaging and how likely they are to happen. Being paranoid and producing everything domestically "just in case" isn't a good solution.

    12. Re:There is a very good word for this phenomena: by slapout · · Score: 1

      high security requirements that entity is not going to buy from a consumer level shop

      Read "The Cukoo's Egg." You don't always have to have the top secret stuff to piece together what's going on.

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    13. Re:There is a very good word for this phenomena: by pomo+monster · · Score: 1

      You forget that as much as business in America (and other NATO countries) depends on Chinese manufacturing, so too does Chinese industry depend on our management, our well-developed and intricate financial institutions, and not least our wealthy markets. Cutting off trade with China in wartime would fuck everybody involved, Chinese and American alike, which is probably the best guarantee we have that we're not going to war anytime soon.

    14. Re:There is a very good word for this phenomena: by rcastro0 · · Score: 1

      Well, I would pick a couple of other words:

      Economic Protectionism.

      Lenovo is not the first case. See P&O and Unocal. I am sure Dell and other competing suppliers to the government have nothing to do with it, though. They wouldn't...

      This all the more senseless considering what another WSJ article says about the Bush Administration's latest national-security strategy report:

      " Much of the 2006 document is devoted to the administration's desire to spread free trade, assist overseas development, promote effective governments and combat protectionism. The fear of protectionism is a new theme in this year's strategy, reflecting increased concerns within the administration that growing jitters over international trade and investment could imperil the
      growth of the world economy
      . " (italics mine)

      --
      Quem a paca cara compra, paca cara pagará.
    15. Re:There is a very good word for this phenomena: by aka1nas · · Score: 1

      " Our steel industry is completely decimated now. We barely make any heavy machinery in the United States. God forbid we actually ever get into a real war against the countries we've outsourced these things to.

      Ah yes, the classic protectionist defense argument.
      "

      The Chinese firms that decimated our Steel industry were backed by the state and dumped chinese steel into the market below the market-clearing price to put our firms out of business and have the market to themselves. So who is the protectionist then?

    16. Re:There is a very good word for this phenomena: by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Look at the Japanese.... no one can sell electronics to them except Japanese.

      I look around in stores here, and it's filled with stuff from Korean, Chinese, US and European firms. Samsung, Nokia, Apple...

      The Xbox has done poorly here for the same reason US cars have done - no adaptation for the target market.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  26. Let's receive sweet buttsex from our goverments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your goverment spends your taxmoney on PC's from a evil-communist-chinese company instead from a probably-little-more-expensive US company and now your goverment spend again your taxmoney to investigate if that chinese company can really be trusted?

    I think that is even more funny than that BS our (german) goverment is doing... (taxation of annuity... cuttung annuity by 50% if you can't afford children... blablabla...)

    Thank you, Slashdot! This really made my day!

  27. Paranoia is healthy by ClayDowling · · Score: 1

    Look, it's likely that the Chinese really are out to get us. Infiltration through industrial means is a common, time honored practice. Any good patriot would be happy to do a little service for his government, especially if there isn't a lot of chance of getting caught. A modified wifi driver would be pretty easy to insert, say one that would transmit key data when it received a certain signal, and otherwise remained inert.

  28. That is one interesting article summary by OP by gorbachev · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Levono is NOT being investigated for spying or bugging the computers sold to the US Government.

    The US Government is basically doing a security check on the computers they ordered to make sure there's nothing extra on those computers.

    Someone got their panties all in a wad is trying to score some polipoints by being patriotic.

    There really is smoke without a fire. This proves it.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
  29. Let's go!! by protomala · · Score: 0, Troll

    Nice doing! Now we all shold start investigations about US companies like Dell, HP and Microsoft, because the government of George "I can spy without judicial order" Bush can pressure them to spy on us (you know, us! that small part know by people as "the rest").

  30. Have they found any thing by swestcott · · Score: 1

    I could be way off here but would they order an evestigation if they had not found somting unusal in the newly orderd systems

  31. Then Cisco/Microsoft should be probed by wanops · · Score: 1

    If same logic applies, it would be a good chance for China to boost Huawei and its own WLAN standards

  32. Of course Lenovo has back-doors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If they're pre-installed with Windows, of course they have back doors. Probably most are unintentional bugs; but possibly one not-so-unintentional bug for every country where Microsoft has a development office.

    The problem with closed-source is that how would the customer even find them.

    I'm shocked that the Government will buy any closed-source software from companies with employees in other countries.

  33. "PC comes pre-loaded with spyware" by peter303 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Though Windows/IE takes less than an hour on average to become infected with spyware after connecting to the Net, Lenevo saves you the trouble by pre-loading it.

    (A joke, not a troll)

  34. There is precident by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

    Ok, so it's not spying. But the explosion could be detected from orbit. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4394002

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  35. This crap pisses me off... by sirwired · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First off, they aren't under a "probe" for possible spying, despite what the article says. A "probe" would imply that somebody has reason to believe there is actually spying going on. Instead, this is a stupid "investigation" to ensure that there isn't, despite a complete lack of evidence saying there is. This is simple xenophobia, nothing more.

    Do the geniuses that ordered this "probe" realize that the vast majority of components in a modern computer come from the orient? That it is VERY difficult to find a keyboard, mouse, case, or power supply that is NOT made in China? Do they know that many laptops (not Lenovo) are manufactured by Chinese-owned companies, and/or made directly in China itself?

    The only thing that could be worrisome is if they had Lenovo handle the builds on the hard drives, but NO classified shop should be relying on "outside" builds anyway.

    Do these folks ALSO realize that by law, no computer containing classified data may be connected to a public network of any kind? How is any "bugged" machine supposed to export the data? Osmosis? Telepathy?

    SirWired

    1. Re:This crap pisses me off... by tsaler · · Score: 1

      Though some enterprising company might decide that it could get the business of folks who refuse to buy products made in China, potentially including the U.S. government, and manufacture a computer made completely in the U.S. using only components manufactured in the U.S.

      Is this possible? I don't know. Has someone already done it? I also don't know. But this is Slashdot, you don't do research before you click Submit. I can say with some certainty, however, that if such a company did go this route, they would be able to make quite a bit of money off of their product based on the "Made in USA" tag that you simply can't find on virtually any other computer (with any sense of honesty, anyway).

      Apple certainly has won over some people with their "Designed in California" tag, even if I can track my order and see it being manufactured in Shanghai, for example. If it said "Made in the USA" and it was really true, I'm confident even more people would be won over by it.

    2. Re:This crap pisses me off... by sjwest · · Score: 1

      Indeed - but the debate in the government appears to be is the new 'Trusted Computing' software and hardware on the motherboards etc safe.

      While firms like intel are not that 'willing' to discuss what there hardware does, and an austrailain employee said its not intels job to police the reports of say unauthorized file access/etc that may get sent to them.

      Its an it industry problem which Bill Gates and the committee behind the secrets of what 'trusted computing is' has failed to spell out what there aims where. - safe for the mpaa/riaa or safe or for users? - I'm not a big follower of that sort of thing but i see new room for abuse here and the silience about tc speaks louder than words to me. - While our chinese friends might be honest, who really knows.

    3. Re:This crap pisses me off... by harmless_mammal · · Score: 1

      Classified data is not the issue. Industrial espionage is a big issue that you should not underestimate, and the government is becoming more aware of information security issues.

      Sensitive-but-unclassified (SBU) data also deserves protection, and many non-military government facilities have Information Assurance policies that they are required to follow. Proving that a vendors' facilities and processes cannot be exploited by agents of foreign governments is not a simple matter.

      Yes, the possibility exists that the process is being exploited in favor of US companies, but please realize that foreign employees are harder to investigate, subpoena, or imprison than those in the US. It is, therefore, more important to give foreign suppliers a thorough review.

    4. Re:This crap pisses me off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it said "Made in the USA" and it was really true, I'm confident even more people would be won over by it.

      Far fewer than the customers it would lose due to the higher costs, most likely.

      I think you'll find that about 90% of those flag waving "patriots" driving around in trucks with their "W" bumperstickers have a cheap plastic flag made in china (or taiwan, not that "freedom loving" America treats them differently anymore) stuck on a cheap plastic flagpole in their window. They fly those colors real proud, rain or shine.

    5. Re:This crap pisses me off... by Ruger · · Score: 1

      And unless I'm mistaken, Lenovo was vetted by the US Government when they bought Thinkpad from IBM. Reported in USA Today March 2005. I'm more worried about the Bush administration spying on me, than Lenovo spying on our government.

    6. Re:This crap pisses me off... by tsaler · · Score: 1

      People are willing to pay more for that "Made in the USA" label on any other product. Sure you lose some customers from your potential total by having a higher price tag than the products of your competitors, but "Made in USA" means quality first. Consumers are willing to pay for quality.

      You might be right about the flags. I bought a Support Our Troops wristband from a store because, besides the fact that I support the troops, the money goes towards the USO. Once I took it out of the little plastic package and looked on the underside, it had "Made in China" etched in it. I also have a USA baseball cap that's made in China as well. So, the flags you are talking about probably are made in China too.

    7. Re:This crap pisses me off... by chris_7d0h · · Score: 1

      E.g. by sticking an "RFID tag" or similar device onto the clothes of an employee with enough security clearance to name but one way. Most secure facilities are screened against radio emissions coming into / leaving the screened area. However, since the protected computer hardware is not networked to the outside world people have to pass the screened barrier in order to use the equipment. The same people will also not live in these secured rooms and will eventually have to get home to their families. In this light, I wouldn't put it past any of the larger security agencies (or even companies) in the world of being able to modify a certain shipping of one or more components used in batches for destinations where classified data is processed (e.g. RFID or other radio transmitter technology embedded). Having a receiver on a target (a person) would act as a relay point and once the target is on the outside, the information can easilly be transferred from the target to a third party.

      Just look at the capabilities of any modern mobile phone for god's sake and know that a lot of classified research is at least 10 years ahead of technologies available on the public market.

      --
      In a society that believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda ~ Bill Durodié
    8. Re:This crap pisses me off... by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      And unless I'm mistaken, Lenovo was vetted by the US Government when they bought Thinkpad from IBM.

      I believe you misspelled "bribed".

      Corrected sentence:
      And unless I'm mistaken, Lenovo bribed the US Government when they bought Thinkpad from IBM.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  36. Mixed feelings by dvdsmith · · Score: 1

    While I see the need to be wary when a major supplier could be potentially be comprimised (a good intelligence agency SHOULD be paranoid), I sense a knee-jerk xenophobic reaction here. In my limited experience with PCs at gov't agencies, they were all imaged by the local IT admins and nothing preloaded remained from the manufacturer. Any sort of spying tools would have to be in the hardware (or BIOS?).

    Anyone naive enough to think we can just "Buy Amuricun" (sic) obviously doesn't understand the PC market. Just my opinion. :)

    --
    "Build something idiot proof, and someone will build a better idiot" - Samuel Clemens
  37. Mod Parent up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod Parent up. It's a vaild point and no hint of a TROLL. Just some mod abusing power.

  38. Shouldn't that be alleged spying by V7iktor · · Score: 1

    Or since everyone is spying on everyone we just assume that.

  39. This is a good argument for open source hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Like it or not, we totally depend on other countries. I used to work on a military system that used tubes (valves for you brits). The tubes were no longer made in the west. The only source of the tubes was the USSR (with whom we would have been at war, if there was a war). If the third world war had lasted more than a month, we would have had to order spare parts from the Russians.

    Mil Spec used to require second source suppliers for everything. That means every chip, resistor and capacitor. To do that now would require that several companies have the complete design of everything down to the last square mm of silicon. Such a policy would effectively prevent spying devices because many people would be able to examine the design. The same reason that open source is safer than Windows is the same reason that hardware designs should be open sourced (or at least second sourced).

    BTW. You are absolutely right. Even friendly countries spy on each other. There was a story going around a while ago about an embassy had to be totally torn down because the local workers who built it had planted many microphones in it.

  40. Delirious by End+Program · · Score: 1

    I miss the cold war. Back when hot Russian chicks seduced you into bed to trick you into giving up your national secrets. Oh wait, damn, that was James Bond :-(

  41. This is really beautiful (or at least, ironic)! by mmell · · Score: 1, Troll

    The United States Government, that same stalwart agency that wanted to cap all civilian encryption at 56-bits, that wanted escrow technology built into every hardware encryption device, that prosecuted (persecuted?) the author of PGP for posting his work on the WWW - the same staunch defenders of freedom, champions of fairness and all that is good and right in the world; now they must contend with the possibility of somebody pissing in their soup!

    Is it just me, or does anybody else feel the urge to shout "The circle is complete"?

    Lenovo oughtta incorporate a fritz chip in all PC sales to the U. S. government - it should be tuned to permit only the manufacturer pre-loaded OS to boot, and to reject all attempts at modification of the encryption protocols. They should further lock the homepages on such machines to "www.whitehouse.com" and actively refuse to load any encryption technologies such as PGP, insisting instead that the hardware encryption kindly included by Lenovo be used for all security purposes. Of course, Lenovo would never install escrow technology on these machines, so the U. S. government should trust them implicitly.

    </rant>

  42. Dear Lenovo, The key is under the mat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    B. Gates.

  43. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did any of you even read the article?
    The US government didn't think there was a security issue when these PCs were built by CHINESE workers in CHINA owned by an American company - only when the manufacturer was bought by a Chinese company.

    That leaves 2 options:
    Either:
    The USCC thinks that Chinese Spies would need permission from the company owners before conducting such an operation
    Or:
    The USCC is being used as a political tool for the purposes of economic protectionizm

    The recent trend toward economic protectionizm in the USA has nothing to do with national security - if it did, it wouldn't be targetted at companies based in the USAs closest allies (for example, Britain).

  44. dont by nihaopaul · · Score: 1

    dont hate the player, hate the game

    1. Re:dont by gb506 · · Score: 1
      dont hate the player, hate the game

      And at nihaopaul's funeral, the speaker says: "And we all remember, with differing levels of fondness, nihaopaul's omnipresent scowl due to his perpetual state of infuriation and powerlessness, caused by what he called 'the game.'"

  45. oddly enough... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    they're worried that the laptop spies on you yet they're totally cool with running Windows.

    Go figure.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  46. Why is it a public story? by XMilkProject · · Score: 1

    I don't see why this is a big public story. Why did they even tell Lenovo about this.

    If the U.S. is concerned (which is reasonable), then they just take a few laptops out of the shipment when it arrives and send it down to the lab to be inspected and tested. If everything is in order, pass out the rest of them.

    If you do find something, then... uh... Bomb china or whatever it is we do when people piss us off. Oh, and ask for your money back.

    I don't see why this should be a story, I would hope that anytime an electronics purchase is made which will involve classified data, that the devices are atleast mildly inspected before use. Especially when they are provided by a foreign country.

    --
    Big ones, small ones, some as big as yer 'ead!
    Give 'em a twist, a flick o' the wrist...
  47. You are dead wrong, Zonk by analog_line · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is exactly the kind of thing our intelligence communities should be getting involved in. First off, this kind of stunt would be the first thing our own intelligence agencies would try to do if the Chinese government were buying computers built by an American company on American soil. Some arm of the US intelligence community planted bugs in wine bottles and other amusing places near the UN ambassadors on the Security Council during the buildup to the Iraq War.

    The Chinese practically wrote the book on espionage. For some interesting reading on the subject take a look at The Tao of Spycraft". Interesting, if extremely dry, reading if you're interested in the intelligence community. A very good look at the LONG history of intelligence practice that the Chinese government has to draw on. I got interested working in computer security when everyone else in my office was ex-mil intelligence.

    And not being particularly antagonistic toward us doesn't mean anything. Back in 1999/2000, the general opinion by most of my co-workers who knew something about it was that France and Israel were the countries that were spying on us the most, with China coming in third. The only reason Britain wasn't number 1 on the list was "we already give them everything we know."

    I wouldn't put it past us to try it on them, so it would be ridiculous to trust that they wouldn't try it to us too.

    1. Re:You are dead wrong, Zonk by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 2, Informative
      dude.. you really need to get a grip. You think the Chinese had no prior ability to do things like you suggest before they actually purchased the laptop biz? And the USCC is not the intel community:
      Composition: The Commission is composed of 12 members, three of whom are selected by each of the Majority and Minority Leaders of the Senate, and the Speaker and the Minority Leader of the House. The Commissioners serve two-year terms.
      I said many times during the DPW brooha that one cannot easily pick a point where things are 'secure' from foreign security risk. Don't want a foreign made pc? Then buy one from a US company that manufactures all the components in the US, assembles in the US and only employees US nationals. Good luck.
    2. Re:You are dead wrong, Zonk by maxume · · Score: 1

      Lenovo is a Chinese/American company. They are currently headquartered in New York(state) and are moving to North Carolina. A bunch of the officers in the company are Americans.

      If the Chinese were going to alter computers in order to spy on the US government, they would do it at the factory level, not at the corporate level.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  48. This is soo great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most comments here focus on how great the job is that the intelligence does and how important it is to be sure that the "damn chinese" don't destroy your country...

    Most of you seem to be so into this thought world that they don't realize that their great goverment is going through all this effort just for the sake of NOT buying 16,000 anywhere else than in china?

  49. Jerry Taylor In Tuttle by XMilkProject · · Score: 2, Funny

    Probably they should ship the laptops to Jerry Taylor in Tuttle, Oklahoma for inspection.

    --
    Big ones, small ones, some as big as yer 'ead!
    Give 'em a twist, a flick o' the wrist...
  50. Declining population by hackwrench · · Score: 2, Interesting

    China:1,306,313,813
    United States: 298,290,000
    Get back to me when China doesn't outnumber the United States 4 to 1.

    But seriously, what effect does declining population have on either China's stability or beligerence.

    Also, what does it say when successive generations are viewed not as hope for the future but a threat to it?

    1. Re:Declining population by anaesthetica · · Score: 1

      Historical data supports a fairly strong correlation between a population bulges (a large generation of young people) and instability or belligerence. The fact that China has fewer young people in it current generation than in previous generations is a sign of declining population and supports the likelihood that they will be less belligerent.

  51. Only on slashdot... by pmike_bauer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...are you going to find a collection of article summaries that:

    1) criticize the United States for using it's intelligence resources to protect itself from a corporation operating out of Communist China.

    2) criticize the US for not using intelligence resources "_enough_" to protect its ports/borders/etc.

    3) criticize the US for using intelligence resource "_too_much_" by wire-tapping potential terrorists.

    Go figure.

    --
    I read /. for the (Score:-1, Conservative) comments.
    1. Re:Only on slashdot... by Cal+Paterson · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's almost like all members of the slashdot community have free will and disagree on some issues. Grow up.

    2. Re:Only on slashdot... by pmike_bauer · · Score: 1

      Granted, my comment was a general observation on the prevailing set of opinions on /.

      If anything, take the comment as a vague, general condemnation of /. political group-think.

      A discerning person recognizes that general observations do not necessarily apply to individuals.

      --
      I read /. for the (Score:-1, Conservative) comments.
    3. Re:Only on slashdot... by Hrodvitnir · · Score: 1

      You say that like it's a bad thing.

      Perhaps we should all have the same opinions (as you?).

      --
      "There are more important things than stopping terrorism. Upholding the Constitution is one of them." - Ars Forumer.
    4. Re:Only on slashdot... by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      Those positions could be entirely consistent. You don't have to resort to the hypothesis that there's more than one person on Slashdot and that there's a diversity of views.

      Nobody's shown a concrete reason to worry about Lenovo, the wiretaps of "potential terrorists" led the FBI to complain that their time was being wasted with dead ends (not to mention that the complaint was that the wiretaps were against the law), and the 9/11 commission pointed to port security as a serious and deadly weakness.

      Maybe you're seeing a position which holds that intelligence resources should be spent to protect the country against real threats and not wasted.

    5. Re:Only on slashdot... by volsung · · Score: 1
      It is also quite possible that for any given article, you are more likely to hear from people who want to complain. Sure, lots of people hold contradictory opinions. However, any given set of slashdot comments represents a tiny fraction of the entire community, and is extremely non-random.


      Some fraction of the absurdity you perceive is because bashing is more fun than praising.

    6. Re:Only on slashdot... by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "1) criticize the United States for using it's intelligence resources to protect itself from a corporation operating out of Communist China."

      Except that China is not communist. It is MORE capitalist than the USA. It is also not a democracy.

      "2) criticize the US for not using intelligence resources "_enough_" to protect its ports/borders/etc."

      Actually, every sane government would and does protect it's borders. You don't generally see the security service outsourced to a foreign country for the same reason borders either shouldn't exist or they should be effective at what they are doing. A port is part of the border system.

      "3) criticize the US for using intelligence resource "_too_much_" by wire-tapping potential terrorists."

      Except, that now a "potential terrorist" description fits 90%+ of the total population of the USA.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    7. Re:Only on slashdot... by pmike_bauer · · Score: 1

      "China is not communist. It is MORE capitalist than the USA. It is also not a democracy." I don't know anyone (including the Chinese) that claim China is anything other than Communist. As to them being more capitalistic than the USA, that's just ridiculous. "You don't generally see the security service outsourced to a foreign country" Could you provide evidence of this? If you are refering to the Dubai ports deal, the security was _specifically_ reserved for the Cost Guard. "Except, that now a potential terrorist description fits 90%+ of the total population of the USA." Um, ok. I must be part of the 10% that has never gotten a personal call from Osama or Hamas. If you are on speaking terms with these terrorists, I _want_ sombody else to know about that.

      --
      I read /. for the (Score:-1, Conservative) comments.
    8. Re:Only on slashdot... by Cal+Paterson · · Score: 1

      "Except that China is not communist. It is MORE capitalist than the USA."

      What are you talking about? If you're trying to say what a lot of communists I know say and say that China doesn't entirely follow Marx's theories, then fair point. But MORE capitalist than the USA? You're full of shit.

    9. Re:Only on slashdot... by Cal+Paterson · · Score: 1

      "A discerning person recognizes that general observations do not necessarily apply to individuals."

      Wrong. A discerning person realises that making idiotic generalisations about a community with no political or social common ground is foolish. Slashdot isn't "groupthink" or any of the "i'm-a-trendy-non-conformist" words you want to attribute to it.

      You're looking at the large community, pointing out that they don't all agree, and then acting like it's unprecedented. Fool.

    10. Re:Only on slashdot... by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      This is a result of having multiple editors. What would you prefer? All the news spun in the same direction? It is well known that journalistic integrity isn't a priority at all for slashdot. The next best thing is having conflict in the spin.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    11. Re:Only on slashdot... by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      It is MORE capitalist than the USA.

      Ok, where do I go to buy a majority share in a Chinese company?

      Oh wait, I can't.

      Thanks

    12. Re:Only on slashdot... by Righ · · Score: 1

      Logical fallacy. You are grouping people who have not formed a consensus of opinion and then damning them for it. Very poorly executed argument, and the mods who scored you "5" need to watch paint dry if they think that was interesting.

    13. Re:Only on slashdot... by superyooser · · Score: 1
      Except that China is not communist. It is MORE capitalist than the USA. It is also not a democracy.

      The reason for security concerns is not because China is communist.

      It's because China is Communist.

    14. Re:Only on slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, where do I go to buy a majority share in a Chinese company?

      Oh wait, I can't.

      ...and before someone tries to rebut this with the example of the Unocal bid that was shot down, allow me to point out that in China, foreign ownership or controlling interest must abide by a strict set of constraints. Furthermore, foreigners may only invest in a special category of shares. These restrictions hardly comprise a free market.

      By comparison, in the United States foreign ownership restrictions are generally only found in transportation, telecommunications, energy, healthcare, and defense industries; outside of those industries it is pretty much completely open. Before we all sing the praises of the U.S. business environment's openness however, allow me to explain why many other nations operate more closed business environments.

      The open environment allows companies like Espire Infolabs headquartered in another nation for example, to establish a corporate presence in the U.S. (see their old contact pages showing their now-defunct branches in the U.S.). These can be nothing more than branches that funnel funds back to headquarters. They can also close up, declare bankruptcy, and break contracts, with no recourse to pursue them for making you whole back at the headquarters in the home nation unless you start talking seven to eight figures at stake. Completely legal. I know all this because I'm one of the creditors in their bankruptcy case. Expensive mistakes like these are the cost of doing business in the U.S.

      However, nations like China are concerned about these types of outcomes that they consider predatory if they open up their business environment like the U.S. has opened up. If their politicians believe their business culture is not as sophisticated and prone to predation, then they will put in restrictions like we see today. In a more closed environment where only native citizens are allowed to retain controlling interest for example, outcomes like I described generally depend upon the creditors' willingness to get nasty in the court system with those citizens. It is not all doom and gloom if a nation opens up, however. For example, information and communications technology lets me quickly and easily verify that Espire Infolabs doesn't open another presence in the U.S. based upon that brand. If they use that brand in the U.S. again, I'll go after them for the funds they owe, plus interest, plus attorney and court fees. They can open up under a different name and throw away the enormous marketing and sales investment they have made into that brand, of course; I check for that less frequently because I can't automate that. On the balance, even after getting reamed because the environment allows such dynamics, I believe the U.S. is a stronger nation for it. Wasn't a fatal incident for my business, and I'm still around, at least.

      The situation will only get better in the future, I believe. Eventually trusted reputation systems will get established, and not just the reputation of a company but of the management individuals at the helm can be tracked. Credit scoring is simply a primitive reputation system, and the demand exists to extend its reach. And the calculus of business etiquette will start to eventually change in favor of better practices.

    15. Re:Only on slashdot... by idlemachine · · Score: 1
      Go figure.

      Is it really that difficult to work out that /. isn't a hive mind?

      Or is it the diversity of opinion itself that's bothering you?

    16. Re:Only on slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "If you are refering to the Dubai ports deal, the security was _specifically_ reserved for the Cost Guard"

      ...the Cost Guard, huh? Who might they be? Illegal Mexican immigrants? Part-time Wal-Mart employees? Federal prisoners? Chinese slave labor? They all "guard" corporations from the "cost" of paying a fair wage. That there almost looks like a Freudian slip, doesn't it?

      "Um, ok. I must be part of the 10% that has never gotten a personal call from Osama or Hamas. If you are on speaking terms with these terrorists, I _want_ sombody else to know about that."

      reads to me like

      "Waaah! Big daddy guvmint, pertect me from the terrists! Ah'll give up ma rights if'n ya insist, jest pertect me, Preznit Bush!"

      Bunch of pussies hiding from the Osama under their beds, paralyzed by fear and blinded by hate, letting -- no, helping -- these Bushite crooks screw our country up worse than it's ever been.

      Thanks so much for your service to our oligarchy. Too bad for our country and ideals, though...

    17. Re:Only on slashdot... by mgblst · · Score: 1

      1) criticize the United States for using it's intelligence resources to protect itself from a corporation operating out of Communist China.
       
      I too wonder about the people on slashdot who get upset about this. This seems like a reasonable thing to do. Spying on other countries has been going on for a long time, simply because having that extra bit of information is so useful. Not log after that, counter-intelligence was invented to try to stop spying, and that is all they are doing here.

      2) criticize the US for not using intelligence resources "_enough_" to protect its ports/borders/etc.
       
      Criticism is valid, there is nothing wrong with that. Many people believe that the US is focusing on the wrong areas. I don't think this is a wrong area, but there is nothing wrong with asking people int he government to justify why they are doing something.

      3) criticize the US for using intelligence resource "_too_much_" by wire-tapping potential terrorists.
       
      Come on...Potential terrorists is pretty much everyone. The problem with this is that it breeds mistrust and paranoia. There were rules against this for a reason. The government would love to know everything that its population is doing at all times, but this environment is not a good place to live.

  52. A better use of intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    There just has to be better uses of our intelligence community's time.


    There is. You just don't hear about it.
  53. What is the use? by kevinT · · Score: 1

    Reading the article - it appears that there is only one company that does not use Mainland China for all or part. That is Apple.

    Even Dells are put together in China! If the commies in china wanted to load something - it would already be there!

  54. uummm by arrgster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First of all I think anything installed would quickly be found and be the end of lanovo. secondly If they are going to have this kind of view then they will have to look at all brands of computers like Dell or Gateway because I bet you at least some of the parts (if not all) came from a foreign source. Personally this sounds like a bad press move by a competitor to ruin Lanovo because they make such a good product....

  55. What they really need by edmicman · · Score: 1

    What they really need is a good, union created, American made, General Motors PC!

  56. the reason all of those machines are 0wn3d by swschrad · · Score: 1

    is that the government is buying windows laptops, not secure ones. it doesn't have a lot to do with lenovo.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  57. Re:This is a good argument for open source hardwar by david.heyman · · Score: 1

    That would be the US Embassy in Moscow.

  58. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  59. Not far fetched idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The American government has good reason to be suspicous: they did pretty much the same with the former USSR. US intelligence services have managed to find out what the Russian were looking for and they supplied them with all the desired technologies, pretending to be smuggled out of the US.

    By the late 80s the USSR started to realize that computerized equipments in key economic, military installations started to behave strangely. Some historians contribute this "technological trojan horse" as one of the main factors for the unexpectedly rapid fall of the Communist empire. Gorbachev had to realize that their major infrastructures are bugged, it was just no way to know what systems were doctored.

    It's naive to think that such Communist super power, as China would not try to have an influence at Lenovo.

  60. In debt up to our eyeballs... by jtseng · · Score: 1
    From the Washington Post:

    "...The U.S. could fear concerns that as China possesses U.S. debt, that could give China the ability to influence the U.S. financial situation."

    So not only is the US being buried in debt, it's becoming more reliant on money on a potential strategic competitor. The problems of having Lenovo put in stuff to spy on the innards of the US govt is nothing compared to what could happen if they really wanted to screw us over.

    --

    Sanity.html - Error 404 not found

  61. Mod Parent up!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod Parent up. It's a vaild point and no hint of a TROLL.

  62. Re:The t3rr0r1st threat by symbolic · · Score: 3, Funny

    US Intelligence: "If there is any spying to do on Americans, WE'RE the ones that are going to do it!".

  63. Note to everyone screaming "Xenophobe" by hcob$ · · Score: 1

    What's the best place to plant an intelligence gathering device?

    Hold on to your hat's for this one....



    The best place to plant an intelligence gathering device is precisely where the entity you are spying on assumes that you would never place it!

    --
    Cliff Claven
    K.E.G. Party Chairman
    Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
  64. They have a reason to be paranoid by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    Agreed. While the government does take enormous efforts to block out these things (wireless security problems would be non-existant), there are legitimate fears. Contractors do screw up and break the rules that prohibit access to the Internet and things like that. DoHS in particular had that problem a while back with some of its security audits. One group found dozens of modems that were accessible from outside the DoHS on machines that were part of the DoHS networks.

  65. Why is it .... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Why is it that if someone asserts that the US might be doing the same thing with Windows and other things -- mandated back doors, master keys, etc -- they get dismissed as paranoid cranks who are just bashing the US government.

    But if the Americans accuse a foreign country of doing the exact same thing with the exact same lack of evidence it's a perfectly valid security concern?

    The blurb provides no proof, no belief it's happening, merely that a US agency has decided to insist this possibility be investigated based off a completely unsubstantiated, undefined HUNCH it could theoretically be happening; you know, in the abstract, maybe.

    I mean, if foreign countries started looking at every single piece of exported US technology for the same thing to ensure that Uncle Sam wasn't unfairly targetting them, there would be a huge friggin' uproar. They'd claim it was unfairly infringing on trade or something.

    Bah. I fail to see why the rest of the world should be expected to just simply accept US paranoia and influence, but they get their knickers in a twist over something they have apparently imagined to be a possibility.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  66. DOES NO ONE REMEMBER THIS SLASHDOT ARTICLE???? by slashnot007 · · Score: 2, Informative

    read this. it's about backdoors being put in the routers. this was in 2004. given modern virtualiztion technology and large chip real-estates, the idea of hiding a hardware backdoor into a cpu is not as difficult to imagine as it once was. But of course there's plenty of other places to put stuff that would be damaging. In the bios roms, in the wi-fi, in the grpahics cards and the USB controller chips. just imagine putting a key logger in every usb handler chip. Not to hard ot imagine is it.

    1. Re:DOES NO ONE REMEMBER THIS SLASHDOT ARTICLE???? by slashnot007 · · Score: 1

      Here are the links to the router backdoor articles translated from german: The Netgear WG602 Accesspoint contains an undocumented administrative backdoor. Original, and Followup

  67. Re:We've done this _exact_ trick before by drenehtsral · · Score: 1

    If my memory serves me, we pulled a similar stunt putting in a back door in some mainframe that was sold to Iran sometime in the early '80s that let us read every line of their national budget, plus a bunch of other juicy internal pencil pusher stuff. I think we even got caught at it eventually.

    --

    ---
    Play Six Pack Man. I
  68. US Corps can verify ROMs and installed software by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    Dell, HP, IBM, Apple, and many, many others are most of the time built right next to each other in China.

    However US corporations can inspect the goods returned from manufacturing, verifying that the ROMs and the installed software matches what they provided. I'd imagine they would be doing so already, due to QA and antivirus concerns. A foreign agent would need to infiltrate the US corp to alter the expected results. Plauable but more difficult than the corp and the manufacturing being in an "unfriendly" country.

    1. Re:US Corps can verify ROMs and installed software by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      However US corporations can inspect the goods returned from manufacturing, verifying that the ROMs and the installed software matches what they provided.

      Harder said than done. I could have a chip made that looks just like a ROM, but contains an extra code version that it switches to after say, 100 hours of use.

      You could run checksums all you want, but the only way you could catch that is if you either depackage the chips and inspect it, or happen to inspect your computer after it's alreay been in service for 100 hours.

      I could even make the chip smart enough to detect when a typical checksum is being done, and revert back to the original code.

      People trust computer chips a LOT more than they should.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
  69. Re:We've done this _exact_ trick before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your memory does serve you. I had that in there, but I could not recall if that was common knowledge.

  70. Why is it... by GuloGulo · · Score: 1

    That slashtrolls like you are so quick with the irresponsible and inaccurate speculation? For example

    "Why is it that if someone asserts that the US might be doing the same thing with Windows and other things -- mandated back doors, master keys, etc -- they get dismissed as paranoid cranks who are just bashing the US government."

    Doesn't happen. You can claim otherwise, but whenever the subject comes up, there is widespread agreement that MS has most likely given the US government what it needs to gain covert access. Are you perhaps browsing at -1?

    --
    "The government grants you rights, not the other way around."-- beav007. Yes, these people really exist...
  71. Corp may not be blamed by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    Any built-in addition features in the hardware, the bios or even the preinstalled operating system would be immediately detected and destroy the entire PC business of Lenovo abroad.

    Not necessarily. They could claim that they were infiltrated by a government agent who made a substitution/alteration. It actually is plausible, the government might not want to trust management or more importantly the fewer people who know the less likely it is to leak. They could successfully argue that any corporation or manufacturing process in any country is subject to such infiltration.

  72. Better uses? My ass by cpu_fusion · · Score: 1
    There just has to be better uses of our intelligence community's time.

    Are you fucking kidding me? I'd say it is critical to secure computers in government.

    The real news here is that our government is stupid enough to buy computers from China. Are we going to have Russia building our ICBMs for us now? There are just some things you have to do yourself.

  73. Lenovo's Hengzhi TPM chips by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Specifically, if I were them, I'd look into Lenovo's TPM implementation. The Chinese State Encryption Agency is mandating that these chips be put in be all PCs purchased for security-conscious government use. Lenovo will also be selling these on the mass market.

    The question is whether or not the SEA has mandated backdoors. Since the chips are meant to be used for state purposes, I highly doubt that there's a backdoor in the chips used by China because that would make China weak to spies if someone found out the secret, and it would be difficult to fix since it's in hardware. There does exist the possibility, though, that China mandated that Lenovo make a weakened version of the chip for overseas exports. TPM chips include crypto accelerators. If these were deliberately compromised (somehow -- I'm not sure if it's technically feasable since I'm no crypto expert), then this could be an issue.

    At the very least, the government needs to check to see if any hardware contains a keylogger or something else useful hidden in it to await a remote command. I'm not sure what the technical feasability of inspecting the laptops for all possible exploits is, but they're wise to do so. Espionage history is filled with examples of compromised hardware for spying and sabotage purposes.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  74. It's a scam I'm telling you ! by YukoOhNo · · Score: 1

    What are the chances that this story breaks just the Lenovo Tapes appear on line? Call me cynical but I reckon it's just part of a co-ordinated marketing campain.

  75. You fail to realize most espionage is industrial by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Xenophobia. I have nothing further to add, because that word sums it all up. While there are valid threats against the USA and in the intelligence community there are measures to tap into restricted data, they are NOT going to mess with PCs for fuck's sake! If someone has high security requirements that entity is not going to buy from a consumer level shop ANYWAY.

    That's terribly naive. You fail to realize that most espionage is industrial. Billions of dollars are lost due to industrial espionage, foreign countries acquire R&D info that saves them time and money, their military tech is advanced by years, ...

    Also naive is to think that people with high security are the only target. In the real world espionage often goes for indirect info. What companies are supplying the goods and services, are their changes in orders, their production, etc. You don't have to get the general's plan for an invasion, you may only need to identify his preparations.

  76. we bugged planes we sold them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why wouldn't they do the same to computers we buy?

  77. Iraq? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Didn't the US do the same thing to Iraq in the months leading into the first Gulf War. But with some teletypes/printers that were sold to them. Or is this just an urban myth?

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  78. Lenovo Under U.S. Probe for Spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you thought that the rest of the world was paranoid when they found out about the NSA Key ;-)

  79. Lenovo will have to stand in line by dtjohnson · · Score: 1

    ...to run their spyware, that is. ALL of the hardware and software vendors seem to think it's open season on the user to run whatever spyware and adware on his system they want to. To sweeten the pot, they'll even spam him a few times a week with some post-sale 'great deals' to investigate.

    If the US government buys hardware and/or software for sensitive uses from ANYONE in the current wild west market without thoroughly testing it and removing all of the crap, they are totally insane. Totally.

  80. Hellooooooowwwwwww?????? by gwayne · · Score: 1

    Practically all computer equipment is manufactured in China, Taiwan, Japan or Phillipines. What's to stop them from doing the same?

    1. Re:Hellooooooowwwwwww?????? by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      I remember reading a publically available defense piece on the growing vulnerability of the US to China and other countries precidely due to this problem. THe article was written a few years ago.

      The fact is-- they are the ones making the chips. They are the ones making the hardware. The problem is not only espionage. It is a bigger problem-- if something happens with, say, North Korea, and it destabilizes that part of the world, what will the fallout be on the US economy and defense forces?

      Finally I would say that in international politics, friends spy on friends all the time. Espionage is not only directed at enemies, you know.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  81. This is what intelligence agencies are for by weiserfireman · · Score: 1

    They gather information on friends, enemies, potential enemies, potential friends for the purpose of advance a country's foreign and domestic policies.

    Valuable intelligence can be commercial, political, scientific, or military in nature. It all depends on the goals of the organization gathering the information.

    Intelligence can be gathered by methods as benign as reading a local paper from a world capital to as active as trying to bug the private office of a world leader.

    The opposite mission of a good intelligence agency is counter-intelligence. To be aware that other countries want to gather intelligence and to frustrate their ability to gather information that may harm your own interests.

    This is a case of classic counter-intelligence. Using imagination and saying "what if they bugged the computers when they make them?". Now you have to investigate to see is it possible, how it might be done, how it could be detected if someone did it, and find out if someone did it to us.

    It doesn't matter that this is a US/China situation or a Lithunia/Bulgaria situation. All countries gather intelligence in one form or another on each other. It is good tactics to recognize new possible ways of spying on each other.

    China's intelligence agencies have long placed a priority on information in the US from as many sources as possible. Based on history over the past 50 years it would be foolish to consider them our bosom pals. At best they are neutral, at worst they consider us a threat to their own existence.

    1. Re:This is what intelligence agencies are for by octaene · · Score: 1

      Well said, weiserfireman.

      From the post, Zonk editorializes that "There just has to be better uses of our intelligence community's time."

      This concern was well documented as part of the CFIUS review done when the purchase by Lenovo was being considered by the Government (e.g., prior to approval). Think about it this way; hey, the Chinese Government knows that the U.S. Government is going to buy a ton of Lenovo laptop computers. Ahh-so, maybe re can insert some microcode that will arrow us to spy on zee Americans!

      OK, I'm going to Hell for that overly sarcastic, racist stereotypical statement, but you see where I'm going, right? The U.S. intelligence community must take the time to investigate the issue. That's only being responsible.

  82. PCs will be running Windows? Spy worry? LOL! by dsmatthews · · Score: 1

    If they care about being secure then they should buy gear and OS from the likes of Sun, BSD, SELinux etc.

    A hardware/BIOS root kit is very doable, but Windows already has enough holes in it, so why go to those lengths if you want to spy?

  83. Wow! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Never saw that coming, eh? Imagine, Chinese company bugging computers sold to the US government. Next week, we learn that objects fall when dropped.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  84. Speaking about those Chinese by Enrique1218 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did you know that there are other "American" computer manufacturers have their computers manufacture in Shanghai. I know Apple does. What of HP and Dell? Let's face it, the Chinese make our clothes, trash cans, and anything else that can be brought in an office building. To phrase a popular /. quote, "I for one welcome our Chinese overlords" and "me colloborate long time"

    --
    You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
  85. Economic imperialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just looks like an attempt to scare US government purchasers away from the Chinese made systems. They are obviously hoping that US vendors will be able to make the sales instead.

  86. an embassy had to be totally torn down by wiredog · · Score: 1

    It was the US Embassy in Moscow. Happened in the 80's, IIRC.

  87. We have enteredd the xenophobic stage by Serveert · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anti immigrant, anti foreigners(Lenovo, CNOOC 18.b billion USD bid for US oil company, Dubai ports deal, Israeli attempt to by US security firm,etc etc). We're like this precisely when reports come out saying there is little savings by Americans. Foreigners are flush with cash, they are sitting on piles and piles of dollars, and they're finding dollars are harder to use.

    I still maintain that as this continues this will increase inflation, USD will be the new monopoly money.

    --
    2 years and no mod points. Join reddit. Because openness is good.
  88. Regardless of the merits of this investigation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the only reason it's being done now, and against a conspicuously Chinese company, is because it's an election year. This is exactly the kind of public move that accomplishes little, but looks good to John Q Public. As others have pointed out, virtually all notebooks are manufactured in China these days anyway. And if the notebook itself isn't, some of the parts going into it are. High security agencies should be auditing new equipment anyway, so the whole thing is kind of moot. I bet you after the elections the whole bruhaha will be quietly swept under the rug.

  89. Likewise by einhverfr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    who would be really surprised if the US Gov't was putting pressure on Microsoft to allow backdoors in WIndows to be used to spy on foreign gov'ts....

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    1. Re:Likewise by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I suspect that Microsoft refuses if for no other reason than the USG is a BIG customer, and sooner or later the USG would realise "If MS does it for us, who else would they do it for?" which would open a can of worms MS would rather stay closed.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    2. Re:Likewise by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      I have it on good authority that the PRC required as part of their license agreement, technical support in replacing various parts of Windows including the crypto-api.

      My point is that the concern is mutual. I am not addressing the issues of the merits on either side.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  90. Wow by realilskater · · Score: 1

    And all this time I thought the aliens were the ones doing the probing.

  91. Hmmm . . . by mmell · · Score: 1
    Boy, I must've hit a nerve, eh?

    I wasn't intentionally trolling, merely making an observation. Fortunately, I have karma to burn.

    Unrepentant, and proud of it. I still think that all US Government employees and data centers should use computers with the Trusted Computing Platform present - after all, they are right along with Microsoft et. al. in pushing this technology on the rest of us.

    Use your points. I am unarmed. Mod me down and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!

  92. Newsflash: Diebold bought by Chinese company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /probably still wouldn't be investigated

  93. Politics at work by merky1 · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or does this sound like a power grab by some obscure wanna be organization? While I agree that some review should be put in place when purchasing equipment for sensitive missions, I would imagine that there are other agencies in place to do this.

    --
    --WooooHoooo--
  94. options by jeebus81 · · Score: 1

    buy dell

  95. Congressional White Paper by Phoenix666 · · Score: 1

    To those who are pooh-poohing this story, there have been congressional white papers that document China's widespread efforts to acquire technology and intelligence. The one I read in 1998 detailed how they're using non-intelligence service channels (ie. industrial espionage, etc) to collect that information. But why is that surprising? The CIA's done similar things in the past, so thinking that China, which is expressly expansionist, would not use every means they can think of to strengthen their hand in the looming showdown over Taiwan, is pretty naive.

    Check out page 39 in this: http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/20030730chinaex.pd f

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  96. Re:The t3rr0r1st threat by Wellspring · · Score: 1

    Everyone appears to be using this to vent their outrage at the wiretapping issue. Getting back to the point of the original article, however, I'm not sure why people are against the investigation.

    I guess that it isn't as widely known as I thought, but US companies (and individuals acting alone within those companies) have cooperated with US intelligence in the past. Investigating to see if Chinese citizens have behaved similarly with their government in similar situations seems perfectly logical to me.

    I mean, seriously, what's the argument against it? That so many components are already made in china and a review is long overdue? That the US intelligence agencies have tapped international calls made by Americans? None of the counterarguments seem to have anything to do with the question.

  97. Are you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better uses of the intelligence community's time?

    Like what, pray tell?

    Hunting down pornographers??

  98. the real question is that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who is going to pay for the investigation?

  99. Unless it was DRM by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    All of the stuff in this article could easily be covered under current, nevermind future DRM schemes. And Lonevo(sp?) is certainly involved in that.

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  100. Welcome the beginning of globalization's reversal by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Well, why does the phrase "'told you so" come to mind? Even if it's just an investigation, previous "investigations" of similar types resulted in one thing - the foreign country being told flatly to drop it and leave this to the US. This should be quite interesting to see when China finds itself increasingly shut out. 1.4 billion people does not make for a good lobby when you dont fulfill your end of the bargain on trade by dumping low quality goods made from slave labor on the majority of the world.

    BTW, you might want to look at China as they're quite xenophobic themselves.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  101. A Chinese company spying?? Shocking! by Electric+Eye · · Score: 1

    One answer to this mystery: DUH! When will we learn that China is intent on stealing everything from us: our jobs, our technology, our secrets, our money?

  102. Bullshit. by deacon · · Score: 0
    While we cannot tell if you are a troll or just rooting for the other side, it's not "xenophobia" when there is something to fear.

    The "xenophobia" cry, like the "racism" canard, are simply techniques to try to stifle discussion or criticism.

    The cases of China spying on the US and stealing US technology are too numerous to link to, and I am sure you are well aware of them.

  103. Network by PetriBORG · · Score: 1
    Do these folks ALSO realize that by law, no computer containing classified data may be connected to a public network of any kind? How is any "bugged" machine supposed to export the data? Osmosis? Telepathy?

    While this is true, accidents happen all the time. Consider that the computer might also act like a virus spreading its data to different machines... just waiting on the secured network for ONE pc to get accidently plugged into the wrong slot in the wall.

    While the most important secret computer work is all done in vaults plenty of sensitive info could be spread through one accidental connection.

    --
    Pete/Petri "damn, my chainsaw is clogged with 1's and 0's again." --clyde
  104. This is why US needs India! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Population as large as China, speak better English, democracy, no history of spying or dirty play and the only country outside US where a huge majority of population has a positive view of US. http://pewglobal.org/commentary/display.php?Analys isID=1002

  105. National Security != Waste Of Time by cmholm · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Virtually all laptop manufacturing is already off-shore. If you're worried about foreign spying, you've already lost the war. This "investigation" is a complete waste of time.

    Better late than never. If there's no problem, no problem, which would be nice to know. If there is a problem, the US needs to react to it. Consider it an unintentional consequence of the wholesale offshoring of US (or for that matter, all of the OECD's) manufacturing to cheap labor markets. It's an uncontrolled economics experiment for a major economic power to suddenly switch to having someone else make all of their shit for them. Who knew that not only would the "market" sell the rope that hung them, they would outsource rope making to the hangman.

    Looks like Clancy needs to update one of his opus', in which an agent slips the Chinese Politboro an 0wn3d laptop.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  106. Reality for /.idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reality is that no company that ever wishes to do serious business can spy on their customers. Lenovo is trying to make a serious business. If they're caught and burned: bye bye Lenovo, bye bye many other chinese companies. They'd never be so stupid. All they want is to make some money, and this is just a sensible precaution by the U.S. government.

    Flower people and tree-huggers are so washed down stupid it sometimes makes my head hurt.

  107. Well DUH by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    This is an example of why you dont outsource ( to another country ) a major infrastructure.. ( this also goes for war materials, oil, food, etc )

    Even if the country is friendly today, that can change tomorrow and severely compromise your nation's security.

    Its nice to see people are starting to wake up about this.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  108. Lenovo should welcome the probe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being probed, and coming out clean, is a better situation to be than not being probed and being under ongoing suspicion. Think about it. That way, Lenovo can address such issues with "we're continually being probed by the US government; that's the best guarantee you can have that our machines have no such problems!"

    It also helps the business interests of the company resist Chinese government pressure to install such spying facilities, by saying that they couldn't get away with it because they're constantly being probed.

    It is madness to think that the Chinese government wouldn't try such a thing if they could get away with it. Any government, including the US government, would try it; it has nothing to do with paranoia against evil Communists.

    To the extent that Lenovo is, and wants to be perceived as, a reputable company, Lenovo should welcome the probing.

  109. It's really big in Japan by Foerstner · · Score: 1

    Look at the Japanese.... no one can sell electronics to them except Japanese.

    Really? Sony will be glad to hear that it no longer has to try to compete with iPod.

    --
    The US free market: two halves of a government-granted duopoly are free to set the market price.
  110. Re:This is a good argument for open source hardwar by rarkm · · Score: 1

    >BTW. You are absolutely right. Even friendly countries spy on each other. There was a story going around a
    >while ago about an embassy had to be totally torn down because the local workers who built it had planted
    >many microphones in it.

    That wasn't a "story going around", it was the new U.S. Embassy in Moscow, which was to be built (on Soviet insistence) with Russian labor and materials. The Soviets took this opportunity to build so many listening devices in the structure, that the U.S., after a security review, refused to occupy it and construction stopped in 1985. After considering tearing it down and restarting from scratch, and a 15 year wait, the decision was made to tear off the top two floors, and put on 4 new floors with US security screened labor and US materials flown in (undoubtedly at a nauseatingly high cost).

    Let me hasten to add that the U.S. has also mounted its own surveillance of the Soviet embassy in Washington -- for those of you smarmy types that will reflexively post a "US does it too!" reply.

    Visit the US Spy Museum in Washington, D.C....well worth the visit when you are there, and something of an eye opener for folks that think that security and intelligence are an absurd waste of time.

    Feel free to google it.

    --
    [Insert pretentious and semi-clever sig here: ______ ]
  111. Re:The t3rr0r1st threat by symbolic · · Score: 1

    Given tbe Dubya administration's track record, the whole thing just seems rather hypocritical. Yes, we need to be sure that foreign governments aren't surreptitiously spying on us, but I dare say that we (the citizens) currently face a threat on this side of the ocean that's more pressing.

    Further, I believe that the wiretaps are only part of what's actually visible to the public - I wouldn't be a bit surprised if all kinds of nastiness (unconstitutonal or otherwise) continue to be uncovered. Just yesterday there was an article about the potential use of small airborne drones equipped with cameras to spy on ANY location from a stationary point in the air. What is with the preoccupation this governnment has with spying on everyone for no rationally justifiable reason? ("fer the terrists" doesn't cut it anymore - that's been done to death, and has become little more than a logical fallacy).

  112. one word by advs89 · · Score: 0

    exactly.

    --
    Rirelobql xabjf gung EBG-13 vf gur yrnfg frpher rapelcgvba rire, ohg jbhyq lbh jnfgr lbhe gvzr npghnyyl qrpelcgvat vg???
  113. Man I told them ..... by Allnighterking · · Score: 1

    Ports buy Ports ... danged if they didn't go out and buy computer ports. Ok got them straight now. The Chinese are now buying our SHIPPING ports. Whew. I need to get a better English to Chinese translation system. My bad sorry for the confusion.

    --

    I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.

  114. Side Effects of information dissemination... by B.+Pascal · · Score: 1

    Hello all:

    I can't help but think along this line:

    Our government probes Lenovo for spying charges. Lenovo claims, and truthfully so, that they do not bug their systems. Then, our government concludes the investigation and Lenovo goes free; no harms done, or is there?

    What I don't understand is why this news made it out to the public to begin with. If Lenovo is guilty of spying, then our government wins. If Lenovo is innocent of spying, our government still wins by telling that all US customers out there that if your computer is made from China, it might be bugged and we have to investigate you on that. Seriously, if I was a big computer customer, I would think twice before buying electronics from China.

    Cheers.

    B. Pascal.

  115. Bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "xenophobia" cry, like the "racism" canard, are simply techniques to try to stifle discussion or criticism.

    I agree with you *in this case.* But not with your generalized statement. It's the favorite defense of xenophobes and closet racists. It basically asserts that no such thing as xenophobia or racism exists, so the accusation is false.

    Xenophobia and racism exist. They are both quite common, and they are at the root of many far right and far left opinions.

    And they should be called, just like bullshit.

  116. Re:You fail to realize most espionage is industria by killjoe · · Score: 1

    If I was the chinese and I wanted to conduct industrial espionage wouldn't I target phones instead of PCs?

    --
    evil is as evil does
  117. Hmm... by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

    I figure that if enough countries band together to fight us (and, conversely, very few come to our aid) that they actually have a chance of winning, then there's probably a really good reason.

    In such a situation, it's likely that we've become the new 1939 Germany or 1810 France of the world, and deserve to have our asses handed to us.

  118. Good god - it's worse than that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm sorry, but with all due respect, your words are simply an understatement of the problem.

    One of the biggest security risks are the switch manufacturers. Cisco in particular; but none of the big switch companies are exempt. Cisco, at the Feds insistance, has installed back doors on all their switches. It's called "Lawfull Intercept".

    Cisco has an incredibly HUGE number of H1 and L1 visa people doing their development. With full access to source code. Now, the one thing India isn't is dumb. Put yourself in their shoes. Would you pass up an opportunity to have a back door into just about anywhere? I didn't think so.

    So the problem isn't just the U.S. government. Businesses are far more whole-heartedly selling this country out, for a profit.

  119. Those Damn Communists! Always Spying On Us! by Forezt · · Score: 0

    Does anyone remember when they thought Furbys were being used to spy on the US?

    I'll admit that there is a possibility of all this being true, but people need to stop being complete paranoid freaks. Since when has China been "the enemy"? Korean War? Since then it's just been complete unfounded fear, ignorance, and idiocy towards a nation that isn't any more Communist than this country is Democratic.

  120. I have one thing to say, and that is: by netguardianii · · Score: 0

    Should've seen this coming.

  121. The U.S. Wouldn't bug a Boeing767 Sold to China... by dynamator · · Score: 1
  122. Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Wow, dude, they should have bought Dell."

  123. Dudes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dudes, all your hardware is made in China. What the hell are you talking about?

  124. Re:Welcome the beginning of globalization's revers by Augmento · · Score: 1

    not sure xenophobic is the word for Chinese outlook. its more of, "You are all part of China but don't know it yet." Basically, 1)if you have Chinese ancestry, you are part of China. 2)Anywhere that a person of Chinese ancestry calls home rightfully should be part of China 3)If you are not of chinese ancestry but anyone in your ethnic group lives within current borders of China then all of your ethnic group should rightfully be part of by China. This covers a good chunk of the world and as their borders expand it becomes more inclusive and if China has its way the planet will be united under them eventually.

  125. Re:You fail to realize most espionage is industria by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    If I was the chinese and I wanted to conduct industrial espionage wouldn't I target phones instead of PCs?

    Yes and no. To possibly get inside a decision making process, phones may be useful. To get "dirt" in order to coerce/blackmail, phones would seem quite useful. However phones only access a tiny fraction of the valuable data that computers have access to. Consider a company that makes the "material" that covers stealth aircraft, it might be useful to trickle out all purchase orders to chemical supply companies. Actually a more plausable scenario would be the other direction, trickle out all purchase orders at the chemical supply company and look for those from the defense contractor. The preceding is oversimplified to illustrate a point. However if you can become a supplier to a large cross section of companies in various industries collecting and mining data could provide useful info.

  126. Nothing compared to US shipping ports! by wshwe · · Score: 1

    Having laptops with bugs is nothing compared to having major US shipping ports owned by foreign companies. I would assume hardware is checked for bugs before classified information is stored on them. This should apply no matter who the laptops are made by.

  127. does it matter? by ZhuLien · · Score: 1

    regardless of whether a country is spying on the USA or not, does it matter? I guess it might be funny if a country actually *did* think that Iraq had WMD :D :D :D :D (sorry, couldn't stop laughing) - considering the LACK of intelligence the US government has, why would they mind if anyone was spying? It's like someone in an exam cheating from the classes worst student who is destined to fail anyhow.

  128. SONY RootKit- electronic warfare proof of concept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the US government might be waking up to is that hardware and software that are being passed off as automatic updates, or DRM software may actually be more sophisticated examples of Electronic Warfare.

    If you can back-door government computers using creative approaches (Such as music CDs),
    what is to stop snooping right from the hardware/firmware level?

    ThinkPads generally came with a good deal of IBM software preloaded, and the new systems probably follow the same configuration.

    I remember one company seemingly had a shipment of systems with 'bad hard drives' - several dozen machines
    had hard drives that went bad 6 to 8 months into service. No problem - free hard drive replacements from the supplier, you just had to mail the bad hard drives back to them.
    Now that is a clever way to phish data.
    Once the 'dead' drives were returned to the supplier - the data contained in them could be retrieved using hard drive hardware recovery tools.

    SO if true national security is a must - some federal agency is going to have to build a computer fab in the USA - because most computer parts are made in foreign countries anyway!

    Here we see the limitations of the 'global economy'. You can NOT maintain homeland security and defend the national security when all of your subsystems are built and controlled by foreign powers.

    National Autonomy can only be preserved through total independence from foreign suppliers,
    which is truly impossible to do in the global economy.

    Too bad the USA hardly manufactures anything, anymore.

  129. well the USSR did it ... by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

    Some time ago, USA was building a new embassy compound in Moscow (during the cold war).

    It was built with Russian labour.
    It is so riddled with bugs that it stands unused to this day.

    And you wonder why they are paranoid? You are talking about machines that will process EVERY SINGLE document.

    Sounds like a perfect line of attack from China's point of view.

    --
    "Cats like plain crisps"
  130. biased title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The title for this story is misleading. Wether or not the author intended, it seems to imply that the US government is responding to spying actions.

  131. I figure... by doodlelogic · · Score: 1

    that different people have different opinions.

    This is a community based site on the internet after all.

  132. Shanghai Stock Exchange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Shanghai Stock Exchange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they have a stock exchange. And no, you can't just go buying up companies.

  133. Re:This is a good argument for open source hardwar by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2, Informative

    Such a policy would effectively prevent spying devices because many people would be able to examine the design.

    Spying devices are not documented! When things like this are done, a select few people from a supplier are dragged aside to make a modified version of the product. Having access to the drawings for the original, unmodified product does nothing to prevent this.
    The ONLY way to tell is to tear the actual product apart, having two vendors and lots of documentation does nothing to help with this.

    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
  134. first thing that makes sense of sale of IBM PC Div by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember, US will do anything to start a war, and to me looks like they have been trying to get one with China off and on for a few years. Docestic foreign policy, I guess it's called. Anything to take the electorate's mind off the local scene, and unify them against the external threat, or so the theory goes.

    This is the first thing that I've heard that makes sense out of IBM selling it's huge and profitable PC Division, which as demonstrated by this event, makes a bunch of stuff that the US military rely on heavily, and have for years.

    I can't think why the US would put themselves into this situation, unless for the reasons I outlined in the first paragraph.

    The first few messages by the first few trolls only show how effective such a strategy can be. I wonder if those top postings are maybe plants?

    Anyway, China is big enough to look after itself, and I think the US Govt know they can't actually get into a war with China, but the publicity still achieves the purpose. Works every time. Some of the people, all of the time, right guys?

  135. A thief will think that every man steals by jandersen · · Score: 1

    Not that I find it unlikely that Lenovo should do this or that the Chinese intelligence services may find it attractive to have this kind of access to Computers in the US; but I doubt it would be all that effective. You have too little control over where these machines end up, for one thing.

    The sad fact is that all governments spy; of course China spies on the US and countries in Europe. The US has spies both abroad and at home - we all know that it happens, and instead of giving howl of righteous outrage, we simply have take this into account.

  136. who didn't see this coming by jimmysays · · Score: 1

    I mean Duh!