"Why or how does it cheapen the franchise. Does it somehow make the old ones less credible."
Yes, imagine they re-made Good Film, but the remake was crap. Now everyone who watches the remake first will go around saying Good Film is crap. Simple.
How about a prequel, this works for every worn out franchise. The synopsis would go something like this:
Some really interesting shit which happened to the characters before, but was never referenced in the original movies, and probably introduces plot holes. The actors will also be older (despite being set in the past), but we'll use a soft lens, and hope you don't notice.
"It'll be a big help to me personally!
I work as a research assistant, which involves a great deal of time going through libraries and copying old journal articles (and I get paid, too, can you believe that?)"
Sound more to me like your out of a job
"CNN is reporting that by 2006 the government will have the first of 30 million digitized pages from papers published from 1836 through 1922 which will be available to anyone who has a connection to the net."
Newspapers from 1923 onwards will be available after "rectification."
Car: Hi Dave, where do you want to go today?
Man: I don't want to go nowhere, and my names not Dave.
Car: Affirmative Dave. Destionation: anywhere
Man: What the hell are you doing? stop this goddamn car. I said I don't want to go nowhere.
Car: It's illegal to stop here, Dave. "I don't want to go nowhere" is a double negative; destination: anywhere.
Man: Fine, I don't want to go anywhere, and stop calling me Dave.
Car: Destination: nowhere.
Man: Their is no destination, I don't want to go no place.
Car: Destination: some place.
Man: Jesus Christ, you still don't get it!
Car: Sorry Dave, where do you want to go?
Man: (Under breath) Go to hell you fucking moronic piece of crap
Car: [Crosses into oncoming traffic] Affirmative Dave.
I want no one to escape [his karma whoring], but even after admitting this there is no catharsis, my punishment continuous to allude me and you gain no deeper knowledge of current topic no new knowledge can be extracted from my telling. This post has meant nothing.
No matter what they do, people can always use proxies, or scrape the book(s) over long intervals perhaps. The only solution (I far as I can see) would be not to index the entire book.
No, afraid not. Google Print is designed to help you discover books, not read them from start to finish. It's like going to a bookstore and browsing - only with a Google twist. Google searches across entire books in order to find the pages that are most relevant to your search. Once you're on a book page, you can 'flip' two pages forward and back, view other information about the book and even conduct another search within the book."// steal book
>> Axiom of Transitivity of Inequalities
(Rough) translation: The principle that a comparison of X objects can be concluded by observing the inequalities of their methods.
Also, why is each word's first character uppercase, did you contrive that using an online thesaurus?
Slashdot Mirror
He said "most movies," therefore by inheritance; I thought it was implied that I meant most remakes are worse (not all), hence you do have a choice.
Can anyone explain the fine-line between troll and funny. This was intended as the latter.
I have a shiny spoon, should I post a story?
I know this is gonna sound like I issues, but, next time (and it's just a thought) he could just use real chess pieces.
Yes, imagine they re-made Good Film, but the remake was crap. Now everyone who watches the remake first will go around saying Good Film is crap. Simple.
How about a prequel, this works for every worn out franchise. The synopsis would go something like this: Some really interesting shit which happened to the characters before, but was never referenced in the original movies, and probably introduces plot holes. The actors will also be older (despite being set in the past), but we'll use a soft lens, and hope you don't notice.
"The weird thing is, most movies are remade to be better." No, the weird thing is people (like you) actually think they're better
Ed TV is really where the trilogy went down hill
"It'll be a big help to me personally! I work as a research assistant, which involves a great deal of time going through libraries and copying old journal articles (and I get paid, too, can you believe that?)" Sound more to me like your out of a job
"CNN is reporting that by 2006 the government will have the first of 30 million digitized pages from papers published from 1836 through 1922 which will be available to anyone who has a connection to the net." Newspapers from 1923 onwards will be available after "rectification."
Car: Hi Dave, where do you want to go today?
Man: I don't want to go nowhere, and my names not Dave.
Car: Affirmative Dave. Destionation: anywhere
Man: What the hell are you doing? stop this goddamn car. I said I don't want to go nowhere.
Car: It's illegal to stop here, Dave. "I don't want to go nowhere" is a double negative; destination: anywhere.
Man: Fine, I don't want to go anywhere, and stop calling me Dave.
Car: Destination: nowhere.
Man: Their is no destination, I don't want to go no place.
Car: Destination: some place.
Man: Jesus Christ, you still don't get it!
Car: Sorry Dave, where do you want to go?
Man: (Under breath) Go to hell you fucking moronic piece of crap
Car: [Crosses into oncoming traffic] Affirmative Dave.
No, please clarify. Something about computers?
I want no one to escape [ his karma whoring ], but even after admitting this there is no catharsis, my punishment continuous to allude me and you gain no deeper knowledge of current topic no new knowledge can be extracted from my telling. This post has meant nothing.
No matter what they do, people can always use proxies, or scrape the book(s) over long intervals perhaps. The only solution (I far as I can see) would be not to index the entire book.
yes, I realise the really stupid error in that code. Please don't point it out.
"Can I read an entire book online?
// steal book
No, afraid not. Google Print is designed to help you discover books, not read them from start to finish. It's like going to a bookstore and browsing - only with a Google twist. Google searches across entire books in order to find the pages that are most relevant to your search. Once you're on a book page, you can 'flip' two pages forward and back, view other information about the book and even conduct another search within the book."
string sentance = "We assume that";
string book;
google.search(sentance);
for(book += google.scrape())
{
google.search(sentance);
sentance = google.lastSentance();
}
That's a problem with your object design, not C++.
>> Use the "Preview" button, dumbass.
Comma added by me.
Fuck sake! I sent the last one as plain text, but Slashdot clearly don't convert > and < to HTML entities, the post should have read:
ahh, forget it.
Damn it, that was my first post; I sent it through as HTML formatted, so NL !=
Should have looked like this:
>> Axiom of Transitivity of Inequalities
(Rough) translation: The principle that a comparison of X objects can be concluded by observing the inequalities of their methods.
Also, why is each word's first character uppercase, did you contrive that using an online thesaurus?
>> Axiom of Transitivity of Inequalities (Rough) translation: The principle that a comparison of X objects can be concluded by observing the inequalities of their methods. Also, why is each word's first character uppercase, did you contrive that using an online thesaurus?