Ya Internet Explorer is spyware. Microsoft makes antispyware to protect its own spyware. Irony. If it is true, Microsoft told it, "Firefox is spyware. We feel threatened."
The reason I think it is "free" is because if it costs money it wont sell. Ironically, since its made by Micro$oft you'll probably end up paying for it somehow. The last security "update" was SP2. For non IE users, or to word that better, non idiots, that did nothing. For IE users, or idiots, it did nothing. Micro$oft wouldn't have to buy the "anti" spyware program if SP2 actually did its job. In my opinion, they would still release it just for the hell of it. Trust me, they will end up directly making money from this.
Just one problem(not that I have a problem with this). IE one sucks, two isnt nearly as secure, in fact its not secure at all! and three, it isnt as feature rich as FF, and it never will be for one main reason: extensions.
And also, Napster can't do math. If you buy 10 thousand songs from itunes, which I'm sure almost no one does, it would be 9900 dollars, not 10000. There are other ways of getting music. And plus, you have to pay for your music anyways. If you noticed in the commercial which sucked, they used the high end iPod, and low end hard drive players. They are comparing an apple to a rotten orange(sorry about the pun). Nap$ter won't work. In order for Napster to be cheaper than iTMS, you have to buy at least 16 songs a month, and they can't be the free songs of the week.
Ya Internet Explorer is spyware. Microsoft makes antispyware to protect its own spyware. Irony. If it is true, Microsoft told it, "Firefox is spyware. We feel threatened."
The reason I think it is "free" is because if it costs money it wont sell. Ironically, since its made by Micro$oft you'll probably end up paying for it somehow. The last security "update" was SP2. For non IE users, or to word that better, non idiots, that did nothing. For IE users, or idiots, it did nothing. Micro$oft wouldn't have to buy the "anti" spyware program if SP2 actually did its job. In my opinion, they would still release it just for the hell of it. Trust me, they will end up directly making money from this.
Just one problem(not that I have a problem with this). IE one sucks, two isnt nearly as secure, in fact its not secure at all! and three, it isnt as feature rich as FF, and it never will be for one main reason: extensions.
And also, Napster can't do math. If you buy 10 thousand songs from itunes, which I'm sure almost no one does, it would be 9900 dollars, not 10000. There are other ways of getting music. And plus, you have to pay for your music anyways. If you noticed in the commercial which sucked, they used the high end iPod, and low end hard drive players. They are comparing an apple to a rotten orange(sorry about the pun). Nap$ter won't work. In order for Napster to be cheaper than iTMS, you have to buy at least 16 songs a month, and they can't be the free songs of the week.
Its today.