What is this "European" system of which you speak?
It makes as much sense to try and lump all European countries together as it does to try and lump all the States together, for the purposes of making comparison about cultures or "systems".
You may live in the "United" States, but from an outsiders perspective there certainly seem to be many differences from one area of the country to another.
The trouble is that skype does "just work". My son lives abroad, so we use skype to talk. I'd much rather use a "free" solution (using openly defined protocols and open source software if at all possible).
I'm sure it's possible, but he also uses skype to chat with his friends and it wouldn't be easy to get all of them to use a different solution.
So, he uses multiple clients, or we all just use skype - unless we can find someting worth the hassle of converting to, which would have to work on Linux, Android & Windows.
Do you honestly believe these botnets are made up of thousands of otherwise diligent users who fell prey to a zero-day attack?
The millions of those who can't be bothered to update their systems have been bloody lucky not to get caught up in it then haven't they?
And just because somebody might get caught out by a zero day doesn't automatically absolve everybody from taking some responsibility for the security of their systems.
"unknowingly" being the operative word here. How many of these infections are caused by the user not having up-to-date AV software and blindly clicking on links in random e-mails? You have to take some responsibility.
That's like saying home users should be made personally liable if their PC is infected with a virus that adds it to a botnet and is used for a DDOS attack.
Or like saying a car driver should be responsible for the damage he causes if he crashes into another vehicle.
Why not xxx.[country_code] for porn? No need to add an extra level just for that. I like the idea of a separate porn tld, makes it easy both for those who want to find it, and those who want to avoid it.
Create three pages, one of which contains only links to the other two.
Now "click" from one of the child pages to the other.
On a more serious note - Google may well be a massive generator of links to other sites, but I fail to see its usefulness in being able to click through it to other sites - it does rely on textual input.
There's nothing in the standards that says the sending server has to be in the same domain as the mail client. I can use a gmail server to send mail from a hotmail address, or my ISP's smtp server to send mail from my domain, which may not be big enough to justify it's own infrastructure.
Use OpenPGP, there's the Enigmail plugin for Thunderbird, and a plugin for Outlook. Pretty sure there'll be something for Mac. Certainly Enigmail can be configured to automatically fetch other peoples public keys.
Slashdot Mirror
That's sharp!
What does?
Turn it off, put it back in the box and return it to the retailer - tell them you'd like your money back because you're too stupid to own a computer.
Lotus Notes.
I win!
Or Debian with the mate repositories in your sources.list, as per http://wiki.mate-desktop.org/download
What is this "European" system of which you speak?
It makes as much sense to try and lump all European countries together as it does to try and lump all the States together, for the purposes of making comparison about cultures or "systems".
You may live in the "United" States, but from an outsiders perspective there certainly seem to be many differences from one area of the country to another.
The trouble is that skype does "just work". My son lives abroad, so we use skype to talk. I'd much rather use a "free" solution (using openly defined protocols and open source software if at all possible).
I'm sure it's possible, but he also uses skype to chat with his friends and it wouldn't be easy to get all of them to use a different solution.
So, he uses multiple clients, or we all just use skype - unless we can find someting worth the hassle of converting to, which would have to work on Linux, Android & Windows.
what does that even mean?
No, it's not about stuff, it's about respect.
Do you honestly believe these botnets are made up of thousands of otherwise diligent users who fell prey to a zero-day attack?
The millions of those who can't be bothered to update their systems have been bloody lucky not to get caught up in it then haven't they?
And just because somebody might get caught out by a zero day doesn't automatically absolve everybody from taking some responsibility for the security of their systems.
"unknowingly" being the operative word here.
How many of these infections are caused by the user not having up-to-date AV software and blindly clicking on links in random e-mails?
You have to take some responsibility.
Ok, yes, if the owner has left the keys in the ignition, the doors unlocked, and walked away leaving a big sign on the car saying "please steal me".
That's like saying home users should be made personally liable if their PC is infected with a virus that adds it to a botnet and is used for a DDOS attack.
Or like saying a car driver should be responsible for the damage he causes if he crashes into another vehicle.
Oh.. wait..
Gee, a +13 shift. That was tough to crack.
Rotate, not shift.
http://www.kali.org/official-documentation/
It's a link on the top of the home page. I bet you couldn't find your arse with both hands and a mirror.
non-free porn ?
Why not xxx.[country_code] for porn? No need to add an extra level just for that.
I like the idea of a separate porn tld, makes it easy both for those who want to find it, and those who want to avoid it.
... the better it was.
Create three pages, one of which contains only links to the other two. Now "click" from one of the child pages to the other. On a more serious note - Google may well be a massive generator of links to other sites, but I fail to see its usefulness in being able to click through it to other sites - it does rely on textual input.
Try measuring its terminal velocity by dropping it off of a very tall building. Preferably, drop it on a building owned by Oracle.
FTFY
That's not what the article says, in fact it specifically says
(Note that unlocking is different from "jailbreaking," which opens the phone up for running additional software and remains legal for smartphones.)
so I read it as referring to sim unlocking.
He should have pointed the university admin to RFC2142 then - abuse@[anywhere] shouldn't be available for anybody other than the network admins.
MAC flooding
Well that's just being "clever" for the sake of it. Why can't they just use a simple, keyed, connector - I mean, apart from the obvious?
It could, but that would be wrong.
There's nothing in the standards that says the sending server has to be in the same domain as the mail client.
I can use a gmail server to send mail from a hotmail address, or my ISP's smtp server to send mail from my domain, which may not be big enough to justify it's own infrastructure.
Use OpenPGP, there's the Enigmail plugin for Thunderbird, and a plugin for Outlook. Pretty sure there'll be something for Mac.
Certainly Enigmail can be configured to automatically fetch other peoples public keys.