Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Users

User: SeaBizKit

SeaBizKit's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3

  1. Link too slow? Get it from Google! ;) on Safecracking for the Computer Scientist · · Score: 1

    Sometimes I like to "work around" small issues... http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:uKCwKOYICgkJ: www.crypto.com/papers/safelocks.pdf+safelocks.pdf& hl=en case the link is jacked (shouldn't be...) Just search www.google.com for.... "safelocks.pdf" and you will see the ".pdf" file is second hit... (which is the file that is too busy to download) so just click on "view as html" and you will use googles bandwidth... ;) they can spare some... gl and enjoy! Sea

  2. Re:Two thousand year old prior art on FDA Approves Implantable RFID for Patients · · Score: 1

    Yeah it's hard to turn away from the bible on that fact alone... I still can't fathom someone in a day and time of rome thinking a number could be placed INSIDE someone and then could still be read so they could do transactions... to me that is something that could not be just thought up outta the blue.... but the chip is coming... in your research check out the "Bar Code" and what made its usage explode in the US. I'll give you a hint... (1 company Signed on to the BarCode Idea) then See what relations that company now has with Applied Digital Solutions (the Parrant Company of VeriChip...) after my own research and knowing this is potentially the mark the bible speaks of... I can see that the world will easily embrace this chip... there are WAY TOO MANY positives... and 1 main negitive... (your privacy) will americans be willing to solve all Identity Thieft, Missing Persons issues, Late Detection of Serious Illness, and like 100+ more VERY SERIOUS ISSUES in exchange for their privacy. I say they will in a heart beat! Good Luck... Sea

  3. Re:Two thousand year old prior art on FDA Approves Implantable RFID for Patients · · Score: 1

    All these people posting incorrect versions of the bible... maybe they should do some research and not put much focus on a translation that has been extreemely modified?

    NOTE: *NEW* King James Version (and most other new bibles)
    "Revelation 13:16 - 16 He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads" (http://www.newkingjamesversion.com/verse_search/? book=66&chapter=13&verse=16)

    NOTE 2: King James Version
    "Rev.13[16] And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads"
    (http://www.hti.umich.edu/cgi/k/kjv/kj v-idx?type=D IV1&byte=5379618)

    to me there is a HUGE difference between these two translations...

    and the thought that someone back in the biblical days could concieve of a "mark" or number being put "IN" your hand or "IN" you head
    is amazing....

    and as soon as Applied Digital Solutons can combine thier two products the "digital Angel" and their "RFID Chip" then thier will be no greater product on the face of the earth (not even sliced bread :) ).

    Don't let me sway you... do your own research... :) it is a very intresting set of products...

    Sea