The paladins Shield, even when using the truesilver blade... absorb damage, until a threshold is reached. It's not the paladin's fault you are too weak to over power a short duration shield.
Sorry to say this.. But you should have read their Eula At least once upon installing the game. It states that you cannot use rank titles in your usernames. I know this because I read it. This is the part I hate, Because I dislike reading documentation myself- But if you followed the instructions you wouldn't be having this problem. I know.. Enforcement IS spotty; you might not have been caught if the GM didn't see you, but if your name was following the "Naming Conventions" it wouldnt have mattered.
I am not "making up" terminology, nor do I have an expensive habit. What I am saying, is that Apple never made a big to do over cpu clock speed, instead focusing on the other potential bottlenecks such as hard disk I/O by using SCSI etc, resulting in a more balanced system. I don't even own an Apple. I don't own a Porsche either, but I can admire the engineering.
I disagree Sunny.
Apple has always had a balanced architecture. That's why a 10 year old apple can sell for 100 bucks. I wouldn't pay 100 dollars for a 10 year old pc (I wouldn't by the mac either, but some folks are cheap).
Slashdot Mirror
The paladins Shield, even when using the truesilver blade... absorb damage, until a threshold is reached. It's not the paladin's fault you are too weak to over power a short duration shield.
Sorry to say this.. But you should have read their Eula At least once upon installing the game. It states that you cannot use rank titles in your usernames. I know this because I read it. This is the part I hate, Because I dislike reading documentation myself- But if you followed the instructions you wouldn't be having this problem. I know.. Enforcement IS spotty; you might not have been caught if the GM didn't see you, but if your name was following the "Naming Conventions" it wouldnt have mattered.
one word. and im not making this up- WYSIWYG
I am not "making up" terminology, nor do I have an expensive habit. What I am saying, is that Apple never made a big to do over cpu clock speed, instead focusing on the other potential bottlenecks such as hard disk I/O by using SCSI etc, resulting in a more balanced system. I don't even own an Apple. I don't own a Porsche either, but I can admire the engineering.
I disagree Sunny. Apple has always had a balanced architecture. That's why a 10 year old apple can sell for 100 bucks. I wouldn't pay 100 dollars for a 10 year old pc (I wouldn't by the mac either, but some folks are cheap).
Sounds like they want to balance a pc like a mac. Bout time.