Perhaps the most important reason that Sony has chosen to split its stock is that it has little alternative. The company is building its entire product line around the PlayStation2. If the console fails, Sony's entire market plan will be lost. The company has already thrown its dice on one roll in the PlayStation2, and this financial move is simply the final step that proves that Sony's entire future is based on the PlayStation2. It's all or nothing for the company now.
If the PS2 is a runaway hit, the company will be in its best shape ever. If not...well, Sony's hoping they won't have to deal with that alternative.
If not...then Sony better have one HELL of a backup strategy. The article is saying "Sony is hoping this stock split will be a success." HOPING? What kind of business practice is THAT? Sure, it's good business to take risks, but what if your risk turns into a Bad Move? Are you going to say "Oops" and pull the white sheet over the company's head? Not smart. Sony needs something to be able to recoup it's losses in the event of the PSX-2 being a flop.
Sony, if I may make a suggestion.....Sell off your AIBO dogs at Cost + 20%. That way, you still make a decent profit, and we get AIBO dogs cheap.;)
(P.S.: Yeah, this looks like a huge move on Sony's part, but there are MANY divisions to that company. If the PSX-2 fails, it will hurt them badly, but it won't kill them.)
That being the case, what are they doing? And is Microsoft beind it? If not, I can't see them being too happy.
Speculation back then seemed to say that Inprise/Borland would be hesitant to support/port apps to Linux, when in fact the opposite is showing true. What's going on here?
When you built the Apple I, and HP basically laughed in your face (idiots...), did you and Steve Jobs have any sort of doubt as to the feasibility of a Home Computer? You obviously pressed the issue anyway, and pushed it's success....But I'd imagine that there were mixed feelings when they told you they weren't interested. By that, I mean "Great, they don't care about the project!!", but at the same time, there was that "Why don't they care about the project?"
HP obviously saw a different future. Was there ever a time you thought "This may not work..."
This is nothing new. As a matter of fact, there's actually a really cool Behind-the-scenes featurette on the Matrix DVD. They actually show each step of the process, from the camera circle / GreenScreen, to the Computer rendering of the walls, to finished product. Good stuff.
Whoever thought up this technique was brilliant. The design is simple, but obviously *very* effective. Basically, the design is simply a row of cameras (usually circular with varying height) that film on a central position. The cameras are all exactly synched with eachother, and film simultaneously. During the editing process, the film from each angle is played at the same time, and frames from each camera are used as input to the final master. So say Camera 1 is at position A, Camera 2 is at position B, and Camera 3 is at position C. All three cameras are filming one central point. During editing, Frame 1 is taken from Camera 1, and the next two frames in succession are taken from the next two cameras, all from the SAME TIME POINT. (Since all cameras are exactly synched, you get 3 different angles of the same shot.)
When the editing is finished, the shot appears to rotate around the central film point.
Ah, the product of the marriage of Corporate America and the Science community. How wonderful.
A Monsanto official told the NEW YORK TIMES that the corporation should not have to take responsibility for the safety of its food products. "Monsanto should not have to vouchsafe the safety of biotech food," said Phil Angell, Monsanto's director of corporate communications. "Our interest is in selling as much of it as possible. Assuring its safety is the FDA's job," Angell said.
I build a gizmo. This gizmo is substantially important that many people purchase one. This gizmo has a faulty wire defect causing an explosion large enough to destroy a 3 mile radius. I (the manufacturer) know the gizmo has the defect, but I don't care. My interest is in selling as many as possible. It's the FCC's job to make sure the gizmo is safe. I make the product, but it's not my responsibility to make sure it's safe? Bullshit. As the manufacturer, I have a certain *obligation* to be DAMNED sure this thing is safe. If it's not, people will stop buying them, the government conducts an investigation, my company goes under, and I'm screwed. Doesn't anyone realize this? (Of course not. And our government doesn't care. They just put their blindfold back on and get back to work.)
Monsanto's New Leaf Superior potatoes will have major effects on U.S. agriculture, regardless of their human health consequences (if any).
Of course. As they so eloquently put: "Our interest is in selling as much of it as possible."
To tighten the noose on farmers, Monsanto has a new technology in the pipeline, called "the Terminator."[...]The Terminator is a group of genes that can be spliced into any crop plant, sterilizing all of the plant's seeds. Once Terminator technology has been widely adopted, control of seed production will move from the farmer's field to corporate headquarters and farmers will become wholly dependent upon corporations for seeds.
Good, but what assurance do I have that this shit isn't going to render me sterile? The company could care less, so who's going to tell me this is safe to eat? What about my kids? When I have kids, this will probably be "widely adopted." Does that mean *they* might be sterile?
(By the way, couldn't this constitute a monopoly?)
Monsanto says that its genetic manipulations are providing the "operating system" for running a new generation of plants.
BUZZWORD BINGO!!! I vote Linux. My vegetables better not be running Windows.
A computer operating system, like DOS or Windows or Unix, is fully understandable (!) by the programmers who wrote the code. On the other hand, the genetic code was written by the Creator and no human --or group of humans --understands even a small fraction of it.
This seems to be like placing a Chimp in a Nuclear Reactor control room. Sure, he doesn't understand the ramifications, but that big red button SURE LOOKS PRETTY.
The TIMES says that, to create its New Leaf Superior pesticidal potatoes, Monsanto has had to introduce the Bt gene into thousands of potatoes to get it right because often the introduced gene ends up in an unexpected place in the potato's DNA, creating a plant that doesn't have the right pesticidal properties, or one that is an outright freak.
Picture the poor bumb rummaging through these people's dumpsters. He's not too happy right now. (Judging by the company's disregard for human life, they probably had a sign that said "EDIBLE" on the dumpster. "Look, Doctor! Free case studies!")
We have such a miserably poor understanding of how the organism develops from its DNA that I would be surprised if we don't get one rude shock after another," Lewontin said.
I'm not a fan of Compaq Computers by any stretch of the imagination, but I have to say I think what they're doing with the Test Drive program is fantastic. An absolute no-charge way to give Linux a spin, and even try out your own applications. It may not be the total answer to convincing corporate America that Linux is ready, but it's certainly a good start.
On a related note, I got a FedEx package today, and inside was my Compaq LINUX license plate that I got free from the first test drive. Good stuff!
The plate reads:
Compaq Solutions Alliance Test Drive www.compaq.com/csa
An interesting note about The Tacoma Narrows Bridge....If you watch the video, you can see a car on the bridge. The driver of the car stopped, got out, and hauled his happy ass off the bridge.
What many people don't know, is that there was a dog in the car. The owner didn't save the dog, so the poor critter was barking all the way down into the water.
Q.What distro do you run? A. Slackware. Always have...Started off with Slackware '96. Currently running a mix of machines using Slackware 3.6.0 / 4.0.0 / 7.0.0
Q.What type of a geek are you? A. I became a Geek when I got a Commodore 64 in my hot little hands at the age of 5. That was in 1984.
As my subject line so eloquently states, I believe I should be your next president.
Hell, I'm a people's person. I read Slashdot. I love computers. I have a significantly low tolerance for frivilous lawsuits. And I like Brocolli. Really, I do.
Anyway, our next president should be a geek. Seriously. What typical politician do YOU know of that sympathizes with the geek community? (Al Gore's "Open Source" website DOES NOT COUNT.) And believe me, we know what we're talking about. For example, when DIVX was introduced, I, as well as many many others predicted it's demise, and LOOK! It's gone.
(Hell, we as a community should run. Slashdot for president?)
Intel is going to win. Why? No, not necessarily because they have a superior product (They obviously don't) but they have the marketing muscle.
It's going to be tough for Digital to edge into Intel's market, mainly because nearly all consumers have been brainwashed to look for the "Intel Inside" Logo.
"Excuse me sir, is this an Itanium?" "No, Ma'am. This is an Alpha processor by Digital corporation." "Well Shit, I've never heard of THEM. Where are your Itanium machines?"
Not only that, but Alphas have never really been geared toward the general consumer. Most have been high-end server machines. Also, as far as I know, Alpha won't run x86 code because it uses a different architecture. (Please correct me if I'm wrong.)
"Alpha, huh?..... Well, will it run Quicken, or Microsoft Money?" "No Ma'am, this machine runs a Unix variant, and has a different architecture than Intel processors." "Well Shit, I NEED those programs. Where are your Itanium machines?"
I disagree. John Carmack openly admits to being a fan of Linux, and the GPL of Quake I shows, at least a bit, of devotion.
Quake 1 has been dead as a business model for years. Releasing the source was more of a contribution to the Open Source community rather than a business move.
Also, ID is smarter than to kill one of their products. Releasing the source does quite the opposite. By giving developers the source code, interest in Quake I has been rekindled, and developments are going to spring up left and right. (Also, if a better version of a product comes out, it's natural to buy the better one over the older one. They'll make their money on the newer versions regardless of the state of the predecessors.)
There's always those select few assholes that have to ruin a Good Thing for everyone. That's not to say this problem with the Quake Open Sourcing wasn't expected....it was. The problem is that it's affecting more people then originally conceived.
ID Software does a Good Thing, and releases the source code to Quake. Then, we have this group of people that change the code to cheat in Quake, making the general public think the Open Source community generally does things like this. Now ID has to play "damage control" and fix the problem, and the community also has to repair the damage done by the cheaters.
Instead of looking for ways to cheat in the game, how about really giving the source a good look and maybe LEARN a couple of things. God knows ID programmers know what they're doing, and that code is bound to have a gem or two in there nobody thought of.
Imagine, if you will, Voice recognition software that transcribes words into your own handwriting!
Anyway, I think handwriting recognition is definitely appropriate for handheld computer applications, while Voice recognition will evolve into regular applications.
Just out of curiosity, How long will it be before everyone forgets how to write?
I have Time Warner RoadRunner, and I have it working quite nicely in Linux.
First, make sure your network card is detected. You can use modprobe, but I have PCI NE2000 support compiled right into my kernel, and in my opinion, that's the way to go.
In/etc/rc.d/rc.local, put in a line that says the following:
# Connecting RoadRunner Services (replace ethX with your ethernet device.) dhcpcd ethX
RoadRunner no longer requires a Login, so it's very easy to get it working in Linux. Once you add the dhcpcd line, you should be all set.
Also note, this is for Time Warner RoadRunner. Your cable service may require a login, in which case you would have to use the OS that the login program was written for, or get the Linux equivilant if it exists. I know several RoadRunner login programs were written for Linux before Time Warner eliminated the login, so you may have some luck.
(NOTE: I'm not responsible if you screw up your system, people. This is just how I got my connection working, and working quite well I may add.)
I was thinking....NASA would probably have had a special Motherboard made, or at least a custom BIOS. The classic 486 BIOS didn't support anything larger than 512 Megabytes for a Hard Disk, and the newer 486 BIOS supported up to 2 Gigabytes. A 486 system supporting 10 Gigs is quite uncommon, but can obviously be cusomized to work.
(Although each computer can have a network device, and be hooked up to a standalone drive system. That's possible, and makes more sense.)
How cool would that be to have "National Aeronautics and Space Administration" plus the NASA logo embedded in your computer's BIOS and displayed on boot! Killer.
The unit was supposed to be shipped to Redmond via UPS, but apparently a clerical error at Microsoft's WebTV facility did not allow that to happen as originally planned.
I'm guessing the shipping computer Blue-Screened at an inopportune time.
AOL can sue a spammer, and get $600k out of it. But I guarantee if the recipient of spam sued the spammer, they wouldn't win.
A QUEENS-BASED group that markets apricot seeds as a cancer cure over the Internet has been hit with more than $600,000 in damages for clogging the computer systems of America Online Inc. with the transmission of millions of the unsolicited e-mail messages known as "spam."
I don't doubt that this spammer contributed to AOL's network problems, but it seems like AOL is using them as a scapegoat to use as an excuse for their poor network structure. $600,000 worth? Nope. A big chunk of that money was recovered because the spammers were illegally using AOL's trademark, but AOL is trying to push it as "They clogged up our network."
Now, on to the rightfully concerned parties. Sure, AOL has the definite right to be upset about unnecessary network traffic used as spam, but what about the people who have mailboxes full of it? See, AOL gets a nice tidy $600k reward for disposing of a spammer, but what about everyone who got these spam messages in their inbox? What do they get? "Thank you for forwarding your spam message to abuse@aol.com. While we can't offer a personal response, we will look into the matter and hopefully collect a nice chunk of change while you get spam from 8 million other AOL addresses. Have a nice day."
AOL should use the cash to update their network for their members, but they won't. That money is going into their "So-easy-to-use-no-wonder-it's-number-one" ad campaign. And with every new member who signs on, their network slows down another notch.
I love how the media tends to lay the blame on everything and anything, but I have a thought that they won't like.
Why not say that NEWS MEDIA makes kids violent.
Let's use the same reasoning here. You read in the paper, and see on television reports of murders. Over and Over and Over. Then, you hear and see stories about Rapes. And Kidnapping. And rioting. Now because you read all of this in the paper and see it on the news, that means it's your turn. You've been desensitized to it, so Let's RUN OUT and KILL a man!
Wrong. Why is it wrong? It's wrong for the same reasoning behind why video games don't make people violent. It's a psychological issue, folks! But nobody seems to want to admit that. Why put blame on the individual, when we can blame a mass market?
But if you try to change the scapegoat, the entire argument falls apart. Get over it people, Video games make about as many psychotics as Romper Room.
What I find funny, is Word and Excel are $349.99 each, when purchased seperately. But the lowest end Office 2000 pack is $499, and comes with Access and Outlook. Go figure.
Slashdot Mirror
If the PS2 is a runaway hit, the company will be in its best shape ever. If not...well, Sony's hoping they won't have to deal with that alternative.
If not...then Sony better have one HELL of a backup strategy. The article is saying "Sony is hoping this stock split will be a success." HOPING? What kind of business practice is THAT? Sure, it's good business to take risks, but what if your risk turns into a Bad Move? Are you going to say "Oops" and pull the white sheet over the company's head? Not smart. Sony needs something to be able to recoup it's losses in the event of the PSX-2 being a flop.
Sony, if I may make a suggestion.....Sell off your AIBO dogs at Cost + 20%. That way, you still make a decent profit, and we get AIBO dogs cheap.
(P.S.: Yeah, this looks like a huge move on Sony's part, but there are MANY divisions to that company. If the PSX-2 fails, it will hurt them badly, but it won't kill them.)
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
That being the case, what are they doing? And is Microsoft beind it? If not, I can't see them being too happy.
Speculation back then seemed to say that Inprise/Borland would be hesitant to support/port apps to Linux, when in fact the opposite is showing true. What's going on here?
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
HP obviously saw a different future. Was there ever a time you thought "This may not work..."
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
I'm assuming the person would be fed via IV?
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
Whoever thought up this technique was brilliant. The design is simple, but obviously *very* effective. Basically, the design is simply a row of cameras (usually circular with varying height) that film on a central position. The cameras are all exactly synched with eachother, and film simultaneously. During the editing process, the film from each angle is played at the same time, and frames from each camera are used as input to the final master. So say Camera 1 is at position A, Camera 2 is at position B, and Camera 3 is at position C. All three cameras are filming one central point. During editing, Frame 1 is taken from Camera 1, and the next two frames in succession are taken from the next two cameras, all from the SAME TIME POINT. (Since all cameras are exactly synched, you get 3 different angles of the same shot.)
When the editing is finished, the shot appears to rotate around the central film point.
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
A Monsanto official told the NEW YORK TIMES that the corporation should not have to take responsibility for the safety of its food products. "Monsanto should not have to vouchsafe the safety of biotech food," said Phil Angell, Monsanto's director of corporate communications. "Our interest is in selling as much of it as possible. Assuring its safety is the FDA's job," Angell said.
I build a gizmo. This gizmo is substantially important that many people purchase one. This gizmo has a faulty wire defect causing an explosion large enough to destroy a 3 mile radius. I (the manufacturer) know the gizmo has the defect, but I don't care. My interest is in selling as many as possible. It's the FCC's job to make sure the gizmo is safe. I make the product, but it's not my responsibility to make sure it's safe? Bullshit. As the manufacturer, I have a certain *obligation* to be DAMNED sure this thing is safe. If it's not, people will stop buying them, the government conducts an investigation, my company goes under, and I'm screwed. Doesn't anyone realize this? (Of course not. And our government doesn't care. They just put their blindfold back on and get back to work.)
Monsanto's New Leaf Superior potatoes will have major effects on U.S. agriculture, regardless of their human health consequences (if any).
Of course. As they so eloquently put: "Our interest is in selling as much of it as possible."
To tighten the noose on farmers, Monsanto has a new technology in the pipeline, called "the Terminator."[...]The Terminator is a group of genes that can be spliced into any crop plant, sterilizing all of the plant's seeds. Once Terminator technology has been widely adopted, control of seed production will move from the farmer's field to corporate headquarters and farmers will become wholly dependent upon corporations for seeds.
Good, but what assurance do I have that this shit isn't going to render me sterile? The company could care less, so who's going to tell me this is safe to eat? What about my kids? When I have kids, this will probably be "widely adopted." Does that mean *they* might be sterile?
(By the way, couldn't this constitute a monopoly?)
Monsanto says that its genetic manipulations are providing the "operating system" for running a new generation of plants.
BUZZWORD BINGO!!! I vote Linux. My vegetables better not be running Windows.
A computer operating system, like DOS or Windows or Unix, is fully understandable (!) by the programmers who wrote the code. On the other hand, the genetic code was written by the Creator and no human --or group of humans --understands even a small fraction of it.
This seems to be like placing a Chimp in a Nuclear Reactor control room. Sure, he doesn't understand the ramifications, but that big red button SURE LOOKS PRETTY.
The TIMES says that, to create its New Leaf Superior pesticidal potatoes, Monsanto has had to introduce the Bt gene into thousands of potatoes to get it right because often the introduced gene ends up in an unexpected place in the potato's DNA, creating a plant that doesn't have the right pesticidal properties, or one that is an outright freak.
Picture the poor bumb rummaging through these people's dumpsters. He's not too happy right now. (Judging by the company's disregard for human life, they probably had a sign that said "EDIBLE" on the dumpster. "Look, Doctor! Free case studies!")
We have such a miserably poor understanding of how the organism develops from its DNA that I would be surprised if we don't get one rude shock after another," Lewontin said.
Does "Rude Shock" worry anyone else?
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
On a related note, I got a FedEx package today, and inside was my Compaq LINUX license plate that I got free from the first test drive. Good stuff!
The plate reads:
Compaq Solutions Alliance Test Drive
www.compaq.com/csa
L I N U X
Linus is a Registered Trademark
of Linus Torvalds
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
What many people don't know, is that there was a dog in the car. The owner didn't save the dog, so the poor critter was barking all the way down into the water.
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
Q. What distro do you run?
A. Slackware. Always have...Started off with Slackware '96. Currently running a mix of machines using Slackware 3.6.0 / 4.0.0 / 7.0.0
Q. What type of a geek are you?
A. I became a Geek when I got a Commodore 64 in my hot little hands at the age of 5. That was in 1984.
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
Hell, I'm a people's person. I read Slashdot. I love computers. I have a significantly low tolerance for frivilous lawsuits. And I like Brocolli. Really, I do.
Anyway, our next president should be a geek. Seriously. What typical politician do YOU know of that sympathizes with the geek community? (Al Gore's "Open Source" website DOES NOT COUNT.) And believe me, we know what we're talking about. For example, when DIVX was introduced, I, as well as many many others predicted it's demise, and LOOK! It's gone.
(Hell, we as a community should run. Slashdot for president?)
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
It's going to be tough for Digital to edge into Intel's market, mainly because nearly all consumers have been brainwashed to look for the "Intel Inside" Logo.
"Excuse me sir, is this an Itanium?"
"No, Ma'am. This is an Alpha processor by Digital corporation."
"Well Shit, I've never heard of THEM. Where are your Itanium machines?"
Not only that, but Alphas have never really been geared toward the general consumer. Most have been high-end server machines. Also, as far as I know, Alpha won't run x86 code because it uses a different architecture. (Please correct me if I'm wrong.)
"Alpha, huh?
"No Ma'am, this machine runs a Unix variant, and has a different architecture than Intel processors."
"Well Shit, I NEED those programs. Where are your Itanium machines?"
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
Quake 1 has been dead as a business model for years. Releasing the source was more of a contribution to the Open Source community rather than a business move.
Also, ID is smarter than to kill one of their products. Releasing the source does quite the opposite. By giving developers the source code, interest in Quake I has been rekindled, and developments are going to spring up left and right. (Also, if a better version of a product comes out, it's natural to buy the better one over the older one. They'll make their money on the newer versions regardless of the state of the predecessors.)
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
ID Software does a Good Thing, and releases the source code to Quake. Then, we have this group of people that change the code to cheat in Quake, making the general public think the Open Source community generally does things like this. Now ID has to play "damage control" and fix the problem, and the community also has to repair the damage done by the cheaters.
Instead of looking for ways to cheat in the game, how about really giving the source a good look and maybe LEARN a couple of things. God knows ID programmers know what they're doing, and that code is bound to have a gem or two in there nobody thought of.
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
Anyway, I think handwriting recognition is definitely appropriate for handheld computer applications, while Voice recognition will evolve into regular applications.
Just out of curiosity, How long will it be before everyone forgets how to write?
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
And Happy Holidays to all you intelligent posters out there.
(Hey Sony! I'd like an AIBO for Christmas!!!)
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
I looked at the site, and there is *nothing* anywhere that says it is a joke. Please tell me it's not real.
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
First, make sure your network card is detected. You can use modprobe, but I have PCI NE2000 support compiled right into my kernel, and in my opinion, that's the way to go.
In
# Connecting RoadRunner Services (replace ethX with your ethernet device.)
dhcpcd ethX
RoadRunner no longer requires a Login, so it's very easy to get it working in Linux. Once you add the dhcpcd line, you should be all set.
Also note, this is for Time Warner RoadRunner. Your cable service may require a login, in which case you would have to use the OS that the login program was written for, or get the Linux equivilant if it exists. I know several RoadRunner login programs were written for Linux before Time Warner eliminated the login, so you may have some luck.
(NOTE: I'm not responsible if you screw up your system, people. This is just how I got my connection working, and working quite well I may add.)
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
(Although each computer can have a network device, and be hooked up to a standalone drive system. That's possible, and makes more sense.)
How cool would that be to have "National Aeronautics and Space Administration" plus the NASA logo embedded in your computer's BIOS and displayed on boot! Killer.
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
I'm guessing the shipping computer Blue-Screened at an inopportune time.
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
A QUEENS-BASED group that markets apricot seeds as a cancer cure over the Internet has been hit with more than $600,000 in damages for clogging the computer systems of America Online Inc. with the transmission of millions of the unsolicited e-mail messages known as "spam."
I don't doubt that this spammer contributed to AOL's network problems, but it seems like AOL is using them as a scapegoat to use as an excuse for their poor network structure. $600,000 worth? Nope. A big chunk of that money was recovered because the spammers were illegally using AOL's trademark, but AOL is trying to push it as "They clogged up our network."
Now, on to the rightfully concerned parties. Sure, AOL has the definite right to be upset about unnecessary network traffic used as spam, but what about the people who have mailboxes full of it? See, AOL gets a nice tidy $600k reward for disposing of a spammer, but what about everyone who got these spam messages in their inbox? What do they get? "Thank you for forwarding your spam message to abuse@aol.com. While we can't offer a personal response, we will look into the matter and hopefully collect a nice chunk of change while you get spam from 8 million other AOL addresses. Have a nice day."
AOL should use the cash to update their network for their members, but they won't. That money is going into their "So-easy-to-use-no-wonder-it's-number-one" ad campaign. And with every new member who signs on, their network slows down another notch.
"By God, it must be more spammers."
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
Why not say that NEWS MEDIA makes kids violent.
Let's use the same reasoning here. You read in the paper, and see on television reports of murders. Over and Over and Over. Then, you hear and see stories about Rapes. And Kidnapping. And rioting. Now because you read all of this in the paper and see it on the news, that means it's your turn. You've been desensitized to it, so Let's RUN OUT and KILL a man!
Wrong. Why is it wrong? It's wrong for the same reasoning behind why video games don't make people violent. It's a psychological issue, folks! But nobody seems to want to admit that. Why put blame on the individual, when we can blame a mass market?
But if you try to change the scapegoat, the entire argument falls apart. Get over it people, Video games make about as many psychotics as Romper Room.
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
But the new name? Ugh. All the devices say "Powered by Windows CE." Now, they get to say:
Powered by Windows Powered.
A bit redundant, no?
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
Just create a new folder, and Copy & Paste the following as the new name of the folder:
Win95.{869DADA0-42A0-1069-A2E7-08002B30309D}
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?