Posting a question about an IDE is like posting a questiona bout editors. Everybody is going to have their own idea of what is perfect.
I have found that just like editors a question like this really comes down to individual taste.
With the above paragraph in mind I would recommend SourceInsight as a good development tool. Unfortuanetly it lacks integrated compilation or debugging options (and thus might not truly be considered an IDE).
Some of its highlights are dynamic type resolution, syntax formating, a dynamic context window, team programming support, fast access to large projects etc. etc.
The only downside is that it is a Windows only program. But if you find yourself doing much work on a windows system it is worth taking a look at:
Slashdot Mirror
Um, you say from window-managers to time wasters.
I thought all *nix people were about the command line interface. I always used to hear people rave about how it was so much more effiecent.
So shouldn't the typical slashdot slanted comment be "from time wasters to time wasters"?
Slashdot sucks my ass.
It isn't even playable.
Um, the one crayon quake mod was much better. In fact at least it was playable.
Slashdot sucks my ass.
I have found that just like editors a question like this really comes down to individual taste.
With the above paragraph in mind I would recommend SourceInsight as a good development tool. Unfortuanetly it lacks integrated compilation or debugging options (and thus might not truly be considered an IDE).
Some of its highlights are dynamic type resolution, syntax formating, a dynamic context window, team programming support, fast access to large projects etc. etc.
The only downside is that it is a Windows only program. But if you find yourself doing much work on a windows system it is worth taking a look at:
SourceInsight homepage