I agree with you. Many Americans would truly be confused. For Stanford to try and predict the election based on a mathematical formula, is like when the Super Bowl outcome is prdicted by allowing the computer to play the two teams in a game of Madden 2005. I really do not think that it will work, too many variables.
HMMM... Isn't is interesting that the only nations in the world that will support President Bush are a nation know to harbor terrorists, and a communist nation. Why would Iran throw their support behind a man that has proclaimed a war on terror? Because they know, as well as every other country within this global village, that George W. Bush is incapable of properly destroying terrorist cells or stopping terrorist activity. What an interesting world it is in which we live.
Slashdot Mirror
Ahh, dang; isn't that a drag? If the powdered ice cream didn't make them fat enough... (sarcasm implied)
I agree with you. Many Americans would truly be confused. For Stanford to try and predict the election based on a mathematical formula, is like when the Super Bowl outcome is prdicted by allowing the computer to play the two teams in a game of Madden 2005. I really do not think that it will work, too many variables.
HMMM... Isn't is interesting that the only nations in the world that will support President Bush are a nation know to harbor terrorists, and a communist nation. Why would Iran throw their support behind a man that has proclaimed a war on terror? Because they know, as well as every other country within this global village, that George W. Bush is incapable of properly destroying terrorist cells or stopping terrorist activity. What an interesting world it is in which we live.