Honestly, if you can't think of a suitable way to use it you probably don't need it. Nevermind Seti@home, experimental webrserver or whatever silly usage you might think of... do your bid to save the planet. Recycle it.
Flame at will.
that Steve Jobs has to stay away from Scandinavia or he will be arrested because his company does not comply to the countries IP-laws? I wonder what odds you could get on that on the gamblingsites
I use the same password on almost every site, with a few distinct exceptions (like/., actually -- perhaps I should do something about it).
I could even tell you my never expiring password, and it wouldn't make any difference - you wouldn't be able to use it.
Why?
The keyword of the day is 'seeding'.
I've compiled my own cryptoalghorithm to obscure my standard passord into unique passwords for every site I register at. I use a seedword related to each site in conjunction with my standardized password, and thus gets an unique password for each site.
So say I register at a site which is comprimised. Now the attacker has my obscured password. The attacker would still need my algorithm to be able to figure out what my password is on all the other sites I'm registered at (or have a large quantity of the passwords and start the good ol nuclear powered password cracker).
Say someone gets a hold of my algorithm and is smart enough to figure out that 'ebay.com' is the logical seed for ebay.com, now they would still need my original password.
I understand how this could be misread, but the pharanteses should of course apply to the whole previouse statement and not just the last word.
If I was a torrent-user you would of course be correct, but I'm not:)
I'm fed up with the idea that sharing is caring.
I don't like to share. I don't want anyone using my bandwidth, my CPU-cycles, my harddrive or my bathroom. It's not that I don't have a high bandwidth connection or several idle CPU's laying around, it's just that I don't like the idea of giving when all I want is recieving (i.e. torrent)
I say we put an end to this hippiecomu P2P and other distributed services once and for all.
Actually not quite right. There are "streams" of water in fast motion comming from the poles. Due to global warming almost every one of these streames have vanished. These streams are the fuel that keeps the Gulf stream flowing. Remove the fuel and the Gulf stream stops. Stop the Gulf stream and hello iceage in the northern part of the world.
Slashdot Mirror
Honestly, if you can't think of a suitable way to use it you probably don't need it. Nevermind Seti@home, experimental webrserver or whatever silly usage you might think of... do your bid to save the planet. Recycle it. Flame at will.
With Europe being the worlds largest trade marked, do you really see Apple, Hitachi, Toshiba or Microsoft as they are today without an EU?
You do not bite the hand that feeds you. You obey it, or you get the back of it.
that Steve Jobs has to stay away from Scandinavia or he will be arrested because his company does not comply to the countries IP-laws?
I wonder what odds you could get on that on the gamblingsites
Actually, an EULA has no legal grounds in Norway. There is absolutely no difference on the consumers rights and duties if you add one or not.
It sure doesn't have to be all that insecure.
/., actually -- perhaps I should do something about it).
I could even tell you my never expiring password, and it wouldn't make any difference - you wouldn't be able to use it.
I use the same password on almost every site, with a few distinct exceptions (like
Why?
The keyword of the day is 'seeding'.
I've compiled my own cryptoalghorithm to obscure my standard passord into unique passwords for every site I register at. I use a seedword related to each site in conjunction with my standardized password, and thus gets an unique password for each site.
So say I register at a site which is comprimised. Now the attacker has my obscured password. The attacker would still need my algorithm to be able to figure out what my password is on all the other sites I'm registered at (or have a large quantity of the passwords and start the good ol nuclear powered password cracker). Say someone gets a hold of my algorithm and is smart enough to figure out that 'ebay.com' is the logical seed for ebay.com, now they would still need my original password.
1. Obscurity
2. Security
3. ???
4. Profit!
On behald of my organization I want to thank you for this information!
I understand how this could be misread, but the pharanteses should of course apply to the whole previouse statement and not just the last word. If I was a torrent-user you would of course be correct, but I'm not :)
I'm fed up with the idea that sharing is caring. I don't like to share. I don't want anyone using my bandwidth, my CPU-cycles, my harddrive or my bathroom. It's not that I don't have a high bandwidth connection or several idle CPU's laying around, it's just that I don't like the idea of giving when all I want is recieving (i.e. torrent) I say we put an end to this hippiecomu P2P and other distributed services once and for all.
Actually not quite right.
There are "streams" of water in fast motion comming from the poles. Due to global warming almost every one of these streames have vanished. These streams are the fuel that keeps the Gulf stream flowing. Remove the fuel and the Gulf stream stops. Stop the Gulf stream and hello iceage in the northern part of the world.
A largescale redistributor would have no problem moving that amount of computers if it catches on.