Doesn't it just simply boil down to supporting evidence, whichever way you look at it? It's the same for the elitist academics, and the humble sysops - be prepared to back up what you say - I would analogize it to physics - you can have an open discussion on a debatable theory (ex:strings) - perfect forum for Wiki - unless you're going to back it up with measurable results, until then, all it's going to be is a theory - or in the case of Wiki - an opinion.
Doesn't it just simply boil down to supporting evidence, whichever way you look at it? It's the same for the elitist academics, and the humble sysops - be prepared to back up what you say - I would analogize it to physics - you can have an open discussion on a debatable theory (ex:strings) - perfect forum for Wiki - unless you're going to back it up with measurable results, until then, all it's going to be is a theory - or in the case of Wiki - an opinion.
Slashdot Mirror
Doesn't it just simply boil down to supporting evidence, whichever way you look at it? It's the same for the elitist academics, and the humble sysops - be prepared to back up what you say - I would analogize it to physics - you can have an open discussion on a debatable theory (ex:strings) - perfect forum for Wiki - unless you're going to back it up with measurable results, until then, all it's going to be is a theory - or in the case of Wiki - an opinion.
Doesn't it just simply boil down to supporting evidence, whichever way you look at it? It's the same for the elitist academics, and the humble sysops - be prepared to back up what you say - I would analogize it to physics - you can have an open discussion on a debatable theory (ex:strings) - perfect forum for Wiki - unless you're going to back it up with measurable results, until then, all it's going to be is a theory - or in the case of Wiki - an opinion.
Own A Dog, Feed A Cat!