Slashdot Mirror


Hypo-Allergenic Cats Now Available for Pre-Order

humuhumunukunukuapu' writes "Allerca Inc is now taking reservations for genetically engineered hypo-allergenic cats, which it calls 'lifestyle pets'... and apparently they are just the beginning... Read the press release here... and you can take delivery of a cuddy non-sinus bothering bundle of joy for just $3500. 'The hypoallergenic cats produced by ALLERCA will allow consumers to enjoy the love and companionship of a pet without the cost, inconvenience, risk, and limited effectiveness of current allergy treatments. Clients will take delivery of the first ALLERCA kittens in 2007. The hypoallergenic cat is the first of a planned series of lifestyle pets that ALLERCA will develop over the next few years.' Meow!"

744 comments

  1. Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who would want to own a cat?

    Sincerely,
    A Dog Person

    1. Re:Yeah, but... by Nos. · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're obviously not a cat person. Every cat person knows that nobody owns a cat. The cat will accept your presence in their home, provided you clean their litter box, provide food and water, and attention when requested

    2. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The average slashdotter... Cuz it's probably the only pussy they'll ever get.

    3. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I'm paying $3500, I better well damn own the thing.

    4. Re:Yeah, but... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 4, Funny

      For $6,500 I'll sell you a cat with the exact genome of a dog. Everyone wins! Your girlfriend gets to have a cat. You enjoy the animal because it acts and looks like a dog. And I get enough money to pay for October's bandwidth.

    5. Re:Yeah, but... by netfool · · Score: 0, Troll
      There are these usually smaller framed beings who have larger breats, longer hair that don't have penises (- they have vaginas). They are called Women. Women love cats. And so do their gay male friends.

      Go out and see if you can meet some, maybe you'll get lucky.

      And by lucky, I mean have sex (aka reproducing).

      --
      Left 4 Dead Gaming Group - http://www.l4dgg.com
    6. Re:Yeah, but... by Vainglorious+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've heard this expressed as "dogs have owners; cats have staff"

      --
      My next sig will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush
    7. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I like cats... I can just never eat a whole one.

    8. Re:Yeah, but... by dheltzel · · Score: 4, Funny
      Maybe after they have the allergy thing covered, they can genetically engineer a better disposition for the cats.

      Imagine a Siamese with a pleasant disposition! Maybe they could splice in some dog genes to get a cat that wags it's tail and plays fetch.

      While they are at it, they might as well add that "glow in the dark" gene they put in fish. That would give the little critters they hunt at night a fighting chance. It would be really cool at Halloween too, I'd like a black cat that flouresces red or purple.

    9. Re:Yeah, but... by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

      Dog's are OK if you like living with a slobbering buffoon.

      All the best,
      A Cat Person

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    10. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who needs a woman when you have a sweet sweet dual G5 to go home to every night!

    11. Re:Yeah, but... by icebattle · · Score: 1
      Never trust a girl (or boy, for that matter) who refers to her two stinking cats as "The Boys".

      Believe me, she's more trouble than she's worth...

    12. Re:Yeah, but... by MustardMan · · Score: 1

      I like cats... I can just never eat a whole one.

      Must... resist... pussy... eating... joke....

      Ah, fuck it.

      I bet you don't keep girlfriends for very long do you? *rimshot*

    13. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, so you prefer the company of an emotionally shallow animal.

    14. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most species of dog do not slobber.

      A properly trained dog does not act like a buffoon, and is far more obediant, useful, and intelligent than a cat can ever hope to be.

      All the best
      A Dog Person

    15. Re:Yeah, but... by brain159 · · Score: 1

      A properly trained owner will bring me whatever I desire without me having to resort to violence.

      Best Regards,
      A Cat.

    16. Re:Yeah, but... by mikael · · Score: 3, Funny

      While they are at it, they might as well add that "glow in the dark" gene they put in fish.

      An excellent idea. Trying to find my way across our basement in order to reset the cutout switch during a thunderstorm is like trying to walk across a minefield of highly mobile furry landmines. Put a foot on the wrong place and there is a sudden load noise followed by a sharp pain in your leg.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    17. Re:Yeah, but... by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Maybe after they have the allergy thing covered, they can genetically engineer a better disposition for the cats.

      That's good, but engineering cats without claws would be even better. Maybe they could do something about that hairball thing too.

    18. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Maybe after they have the allergy thing covered, they can genetically engineer a better disposition for the cats.

      So don't get a bloody siamese. Manx are very affectionate and playful like dogs. Except you don't have to walk them like dogs. No tail to worry about stepping on either.

    19. Re:Yeah, but... by DrCode · · Score: 1

      I already have one. It's called a Persian.

    20. Re:Yeah, but... by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      I am very convinced most people who develop allergy over the years wore down their immune system from Detergent Residue on clothes.

      Afterwards, cats, dogs, fur, trees and everything else sip into your skin and you sneeze your brains out or have major hives breakout.

    21. Re:Yeah, but... by yo303 · · Score: 2, Funny
      A dog ponders his relationship with man: "He feeds me, he loves me, he takes care of all my needs... He must be God."

      A cat thinks: "He feeds me, loves me, takes care of me. I must be God."

      yo.

    22. Re:Yeah, but... by AlfredoLambda · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am Persian, you insensitive clod!

    23. Re:Yeah, but... by cmowire · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, the claw thing is kinda a contreversial thing.

    24. Re:Yeah, but... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Informative

      magine a Siamese with a pleasant disposition! Maybe they could splice in some dog genes to get a cat that wags it's tail and plays fetch.

      I had a Siamese cat a few years ago that acted pretty much like a dog. He'd fetch balls of crumpled paper for me, and he had quite a pleasant disposition too. He didn't wag his tail though. To catch my attention, he'd run around the house for momentum, then jump onto the back rest of a sofa, grip it with his front claws, then release.

      When I saw him fly and spin across the room, I knew he wanted out.

      they might as well add that "glow in the dark" gene they put in fish

      May I point out that those fish don't produce any light by themselves?

      From glofish.com:
      Nighttime Viewing - In cases where the room is completely dark, a black light will create the appearance that the fish are glowing in the dark. This is a truly stunning and beautiful way to display your ornamental fish at night! But please remember that the black light will only be helpful in a completely dark room. Using a black light during the daytime will not result in the fish demonstrating its true beauty.

    25. Re:Yeah, but... by FlyingPostman · · Score: 0

      My cat wags its tail AND plays fetch. It also smells a visitor's crotch, just like a dog.

    26. Re:Yeah, but... by mikael · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are several current theories; (1) that our houses are so clean, that the immune system becomes hypersensitive to anything it doesn't recognise. Another theory is that children born through Caeserian section don't have their lungs properly 'wringed' through normal childbirth and are more likely to suffer from asmtha , bronchitis etc... (3) Another theory is that the fumes chemicals such as housecleaners, detergents damage the lining of the lungs.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    27. Re:Yeah, but... by myc_lykaon · · Score: 1
      Every cat person knows that nobody owns a cat.

      And will bore non-cat people senseless with stupid anecdotes about how yesterday at dinner time their cat Snuffles did something sooo cute with the lid to the Chinese takeaway tray.

    28. Re:Yeah, but... by Orgazmus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That is funny.
      Im born through Caeserian, and i had child-astma.
      Luckily i keep my room so dirty, not even bacterial warfare should work on me :)

      --
      The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
    29. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sex, aka, reproducing? You probably think you need to buy her a diamond ring before you get any, huh.

    30. Re:Yeah, but... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      We recently got a new kitten - an Australian Mist, they are specifically bred for their disposition.

      We have a major problem with cats killing native fauna in Australia, so the Mists are bred to be indoors cats who are very people orientated, they are supposedly good with invalids and small children. They come in a number of colours, and their markings fall into 'marbled' or 'spotted' categories.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    31. Re:Yeah, but... by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      wasn't this essentially the plot of a movie?

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    32. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nope, you're only buying a license.

    33. Re:Yeah, but... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      But it really was sooo totally cute. Here, let me show you the slideshow.

      Heh. I wonder if the Geneva convention covers showing slideshows of pets to POWs.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    34. Re:Yeah, but... by Serveert · · Score: 1

      >30 year old cat herding spinsters

      --
      2 years and no mod points. Join reddit. Because openness is good.
    35. Re:Yeah, but... by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      Once the get the price down, they'll probably be able to develop better-tasting ones.

    36. Re:Yeah, but... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Even more reason to wait for Alerca to complete their acquisition of Real Doll, Inc.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    37. Re:Yeah, but... by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Well, the claw thing is kinda a contreversial thing.

      Having had real experience, no you cannot tell a cat what to scratch on. The cat would rather shred your furniture and drapes than scratch the three, expensive, super-fuzzy scratching posts laced with catnip distributed around the house. Even when declawed, cats still make the same scratching movements, so the excercise thing is bogus -- the real *point* of scratching is to sharpen the claws.

      House cats have been bred for all kinds of characteristics for centuries. A clawless breed would be a great house pet and far better for the cat than the trauma it suffers from being declawed. It's not just the surgery (having your fingernails cut out), it's being in a strange place, in pain, with bandages hobbling you and no familiar faces. And the pitiful looks they give you and the sounds they make when you come to pick them up. C'mon people, think of the kittens!! Sorry, I got carried away.

    38. Re:Yeah, but... by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      If you can get one of the "hairball formula" dry foods in their diet it works wonders.

      Look for the ones using SOY LECTINS. Purina has a patent on it, but I think I have seen other brands.

      It works by keeping the hairballs from getting "sticky" in the cat's gut so it slides through a little bit at a time rather than piling up.

      My house of three cats went from 6 pukes a week down to once every month or two. (Aside from the "i ate too fast" puke.)

    39. Re:Yeah, but... by mmmmmhotpants · · Score: 1

      The original poster did use the correct word: "fluoresce", which implies exactly what you were clarifying, that they do not produce light on their own, but rather emit light.

      As far as the glofish, UV (black light) is the only light source that works AT HOME (you don't see the excitation wavelengths of UV because its not in the visible spectrum, but you see the emission spectrum which is). However, the fish might fluoresce at other peaks within the visible spectrum, perhaps with even greater emission. It would be hard to see under white light. And it wouldn't be practical to fire the peak excitation wavelength laser at the fish in a home.

      --

      can't sleep. clowns will eat me.
    40. Re:Yeah, but... by glassjaw+rocks · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you don't know a joke when you see it. Please; outside longs to see you once again.

      --
      -gjr
    41. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fingernails cut out? Try having your fingers amputated up to the first knuckle. Declawing a cat is barbaric and something only an ignorant caviar-munching WASP would do.

    42. Re:Yeah, but... by IronChef · · Score: 1

      I am already staff for my wife, why would I want to be staff for a pet too? But I AM the boss of the DOG, oh YEAH. SIT!!!

    43. Re:Yeah, but... by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      My house of three cats went from 6 pukes a week down to once every month or two. (Aside from the "i ate too fast" puke.)

      Thanks, I am using the Purina "hairball" dry food with some wet food, and you're right, it does reduce the pukes. I'd still like to get rid of the one or two _presents_ per month. And what is it with that "i ate too fast" thing? When you finally give 'em something they like, they toss it back. :)

    44. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A fool is trained by his humans. I train my humans.

      Meow!

    45. Re:Yeah, but... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      No, but Federal law prohibits the showing of them to anyone else.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    46. Re:Yeah, but... by Brummund · · Score: 3, Funny
      I think you might enjoy The War Between alt.tasteless and rec.pets.cats

      Quote:

      Someone - no one remembers who - suggested invading another Usenet group. A Usenet panty raid! The suggestion was well received by other a.t.'ers. But whom to raid? After much discussion, a likely target emerged:

      Rec.pets.cats.

      Rec.pets.cats, as you can tell from the name, is a Usenet group for serious cat lovers. It's the kind of place where people like to discuss cat health problems and adorable things their kitties did. If you were able to put all of humanity on a giant spectrum, cat lovers would undoubtedly occupy the frequency opposite people who are alternatively tasteless.
      :-)
    47. Re:Yeah, but... by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 4, Informative

      ummm, I was born via a c-section and was not breastfed (strikes 1 and 2 against developing a good immune system) and I have absolutely 0 allergies (pets or food) and have never had any sort of throat/lung problems (knock on wood), there goes the c-section theory.

      BTW, I am originally from Europe, and it seems allergies are WAY more common here in North America (I don't think I've ever *met* a person allergic to something before moving here, where I'd say 20-30% of the people I know have an allergy of some kind, most of the time to cats but often to peanuts/eggs).

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    48. Re:Yeah, but... by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Or maybe you could leave well enough alone, and realize there's a reason cat people aren't dog people.

      Now fetch my paper. ;)

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    49. Re:Yeah, but... by Wog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've never seen any arguments against declawing until your link. I can't speak for everyone, but we've had four declawed indoor cats over the last 20 years. I don't think they could have been happier.

      The arguments at the site list things like the "need to scratch" to strengthen leg muscles. They must never have had a declawed cat for more than a few months. They get *incredibly* strong in their front legs, especially when you play with them often like we do. They still do their "scratching" routine on the furniture, but of course it's harmless.

      One note about declawing... it's ONLY FOR INDOOR CATS. Although a couple of the cats are fully capable of pummeling the family bulldog with said front paws, I wouldn't feel right letting them fend for themselves outside.

      They're quite happy, healthy, and well adjusted living in our mid-size house.

    50. Re:Yeah, but... by AndyChrist · · Score: 3, Funny

      You don't have to let a cat be your boss. That only happens if you're a pussy. Just feed it and be nice to it (without neccesarily taking any shit from it) and it will love you just the same.

      You don't have to take orders from it, but you can't expect it to take orders from you.

      That said, my dad trained a cat to attack people, once. Problem was, it would attack absolutely EVERYONE, ALL THE TIME. It disappeared one day. Probably taken by eagles. (Sitka is that kind of place...cats don't do very well there.)

    51. Re:Yeah, but... by kevmit · · Score: 1
      "I am already staff for my wife, why would I want to be staff for a pet [cat] too?"
      Because ALL "pussies", wives AND cats, require almost constant attention, praise and worship or their claws come out.
      My advice is to feed the cat to the dog...hell, simplify your life and feed your wife to the dog too.
    52. Re:Yeah, but... by RedBear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or maybe it's that we evolved with the rest of the animal kingdom living in the great outdoors, where vast volumes of relatively clean air tend to move through our personal space and dilute the levels of particulates in the air, and we aren't used to having such a high concentration of animal dander and other things getting into our lungs on a daily basis. If you think about it, it's really only within the last century or so that we've started developing buildings that are basically airtight. No drafty doors or open windows to transfer air from outside. As the air quality experts say, the air in your home these days is about 5 times as dirty as anything outside, even in areas with poor air quality.

    53. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nahh.

      I train cats. I can get them to act like a dog easily and act on cue.

      most people spoil cats so they become that way. but typically that is not how the species will act.

      hell a dog will act that way if you treat it like a typical cat.

    54. Re:Yeah, but... by admactanium · · Score: 1
      But I AM the boss of the DOG, oh YEAH. SIT!!!
      you pick up your boss's feces with a paper bag?
    55. Re:Yeah, but... by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Declawing a cat is barbaric and something only an ignorant caviar-munching WASP would do.

      Try finding a mewling kitten whose mother was killed by a car in an alley (that makes it an alley cat, I guess). Since it wasn't weaned, the life expectancy was a few hours. The (presumed) other kittens probably died. Consider the time devoted to finding the necessary stuff and applying it to keep the kitten alive. It's now eight years old, fit, and seemingly happy. Bite me, AC. Criticism is easy when you're full of ideals, don't know anything about real life, and don't do anything to make a difference. I assume you would rather your parents had aborted you than put you through your current suffering.

    56. Re:Yeah, but... by feepness · · Score: 4, Funny

      BTW, I am originally from Europe, and it seems allergies are WAY more common here in North America...

      Ah! Another data point correlating cleanliness with allergies!!

    57. Re:Yeah, but... by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

      Wtf does that have to do with declawing the cat?

      I have a cat. Have had her since she was 4 weeks old and she'll be 3 in march. I live with the claws because I know that she needs them for defense in various situations (dog, gets outside, falls and needs to grip something).

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    58. Re:Yeah, but... by lartful_dodger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think what you're after is a Burmese- they don't fetch (that I know of), but they will play hide and seek, and tag. I knew one that lived on a boat and enjoyed the occasional swim. Also, if you read the sidebar in the article, you'd notice that cats already have fluorescent urine

      --
      The face of 'evil' is always the face of total need
    59. Re:Yeah, but... by foxfyre · · Score: 1

      One of my cats wags her tail and plays fetch with small balls of aluminum foil I roll up.

      --
      -- Not a /. dude.
    60. Re:Yeah, but... by Zerbey · · Score: 1

      Pleasant disposition? My Mother had a siamese cat named Balthazar from 1989 until his untimely death in 2001. He basically spent his entire life either eating, or sleeping on whoever's lap was nearest at the time.

      The only time he got upset was when it was a) time for his flea treament b) the dustbin men where outside [prior to those horrible wheelie bin things being handed out in the late 90s]. Then he'd just disappear into the deepest, darkest corner of the cupboard under the stairs and you'd hear muffled hissing if you tried to get close.

      I don't recall him ever attacking anyone except maybe the vet, but that's every cat's noble right.

    61. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying "there goes the C-section theory" based on one data point is pretty ludicrous.

      It's like saying "I'm North American and I don't have allergies so there goes your North America theory"

      Theories like these deal with tendencies, predispositions, and averages. One person without allergies is pretty much meaningless to the proof or disproof of the theory.

    62. Re:Yeah, but... by johnlcallaway · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Cats can be trained, they require a different stimulus than dopey dogs. Dogs are pack animals, and are satisifed with your affection as long as they think you are in charge. Cats want something for their efforts, like food or scratching. It took me less than an hour to train my cat to come when called for a treat, and I trained him to jump into my lap when I whistle to get scratched. It doesn't work all the time, but often enough that a few of my friends that have cats have also been able to train theirs.

      You may think that this training is a waste or just for entertainment (it is pretty funny), but it comes in handy. One day my fiancee saw a black cat on the garage roof and thought that somehow my cat had gotten out. She got all panicky and searched the apartment, then ran outside. I just sat at the dining room table and yelled 'Here Bear, Here Bear', and he came walking from the bedroom with that 'where is my treat' look.

      She got panicky because here in Phoenix cats are called 'coyote treats'.

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    63. Re:Yeah, but... by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Sadly to say, it's probably more a data point correlating pollution and drug use (and I'm not talking maruihana...americans over-medicate to an insane degree; as a consequence, most americans can actually have a conversation about the different medicines they (have) use(d), rattling off the names like a kid pronouncing different dinosaurs [ie fluently]...it's rather baffling to someone used to a doctor who can and will still say 'you have x, just rest a bit' without having to proscribe medicine for fear of malpractice lawsuits).

      I did get that the previous poster was joking, by the way :)

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    64. Re:Yeah, but... by shyster · · Score: 1
      ummm, I was born via a c-section and was not breastfed (strikes 1 and 2 against developing a good immune system) and I have absolutely 0 allergies (pets or food) and have never had any sort of throat/lung problems (knock on wood), there goes the c-section theory.

      Whew! Glad you clearedthat up for us, Marco. We were looking at doing some million-dollar studies to test our hypotheses that allergies and C-section deliveries were somehow correlated.

      Thankfully, I read your Slashdot post just in time, however. Since you don't have allergies, I can definitely proclaim that there is no correlation between C-sections and allergies!

      For anyone who would like to replicate my study, feel free to ask MarcoAtWork if he has developed any allergies. Thank you again, Marco, for saving me countless hours of time. Now I can go read some more Slashdot blather.

      Sincerely,
      Julie Louise Gerberding, MD, MPH
      Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    65. Re:Yeah, but... by phasmal · · Score: 1

      I *have* a cat that plays fetch. He's a Siamese which are well known for being able to learn such games (although mine taught himself).

      He has a pleasant disposition, too... Its just that if he wants his staff to do something he finds the most effective way to do it is to (quite happily) bite me!

      -- Phasmal

    66. Re:Yeah, but... by iso · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've heard this before, and chuckled. But after hearing co-workers say things like "nah, I can't go out for drinks: I need to go home and let the dog out," and watching people walk behind a dog and pick up its shit off the ground, I wonder sometimes, which animal really has the staff?

    67. Re:Yeah, but... by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Maybe they could splice in some dog genes to get a cat that wags it's tail and plays fetch.

      My cat already does this. He comes when called too. He used to "speak" on command (have not done that in a long time) and even alerts us when his food and water reserves are below par. ;) When describing my cat (my wife's actually) to people, I commonly call it a, "cat-dog". AFAIC, we have a "cat-dog" because we treated like a dog.

    68. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I'm concerned, all they have to do is grow a cat that doesn't shed.

    69. Re:Yeah, but... by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't you know? The cat trained YOU!

      (Cue Soviet Russia jokes...)

    70. Re:Yeah, but... by Mr_CFG · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pain in the leg? If you step on them hard enough, they don't strike back...

    71. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds me of another yet-unmentioned theory:

      GMF could be responsible!

    72. Re:Yeah, but... by johnlcallaway · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hope you get a ton of 'funny' modifiers for your karma, because that is very, very true.

      True story. Every night, at least once, my cat comes to the bed and meows. He will stay down at the side of the bed until I take my hand and rub my fingers together to make whatever sound two fingers rubbing together make. If I don't rub my fingers together, he will leave. If I do, he will jump up beside me and expect to be scratched and petted. Eventually, he will stand on my chest, at which point I stop petting him until he gets off (he weighs 15 pounds and it is not very comfortable). Repeat at least two more times. Then he will lie next to me and I will continue to pet him until I get tired of it. Then he will get down and go do whatever things cats do at night.

      Did I train him to respond to my cues, or did he train me? Human ego says I trained him. Reality says otherwise.

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    73. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well actually my cat did do something cute and funny with my husbands chinese takeout order. It was in a plastic bag in the livingroom and the cat went to see what was in there. He came in the livingroom and startled the cat who proceeded to race around the livingroom with the bag of chinese attached to his head. Not a drop of food spilled until the cat went under a folding chair and thereby freed his head from the bag. So when I came out there my husband is cleaning up the mess and the cat looks completely cute and innocent. It was very funny to hear about it.

    74. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "nah, I can't go out for drinks: I need to go home and let the dog out,"

      Yeah, but I think here "go home and let the dog out" is a euphemism for "go bang your wife"

    75. Re:Yeah, but... by violajack · · Score: 1

      OOOOO.....ok....but be gentle, this is my first....

      In Soviet Russia.....YOU train the CAT!
      No, that's no good, it needs to end with "you"....um....the cat..umm...is allergic to YOU!

      Oh, I give up....just imagine a Beowolf cluster of hyperallergenic cats, okay?

    76. Re:Yeah, but... by freeweed · · Score: 1

      The plural of anecdote is still not data.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    77. Re:Yeah, but... by Uerige · · Score: 1

      our houses are so clean, that the immune system becomes hypersensitive

      Good lord I'm safe!

    78. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Imagine a Siamese with a pleasant disposition!"

      I actually have a half Siamese/half unknown cat that has most of the intelligence of a Siamese but is also very affectionite and seeks to be petted quite a few times during the day. In the mornings it literally will follow you around the house, prancing and wagging it's tail. It's pretty weird.... actually..

    79. Re:Yeah, but... by dargaud · · Score: 2
      "You can own a dog but you can only feed a cat..."

      More on topic, this genetically enhanced cat is a good idea. I've had cats and dogs until I was 16. Then I moves to the city away from my parents. Upon returning after a month away... I was allergic to the cat ! I've kept this allergy and although I like to pet my current neighbor's cat I can't have one nearby for long. Yes, I know you can shower your cat daily to greatly disminish the allergens, but I think it's probably a lot more life-threatening to clean a cat than to live in an iron lung.

      As for what I think of dogs, I had a few run-ins with those social parasites in the US and their often 'religiously stupid' owners which led to this piece.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    80. Re:Yeah, but... by Pleione · · Score: 1

      Thats a privilege that cat owners get. Dog owners get to talk about how Fido pissed on the rug, chewed up their expensive leather jacket and shit in the bathtub.

    81. Re:Yeah, but... by Pleione · · Score: 1

      The fact that you even have to train a dog is proof that they aren't as intelligent as cats. Another perfect test is to let a domestic dog and a cat go in the wild. The dog would be dead in a week or two, whereas the cat would survive.

    82. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cats expressing the GFP protein are already availabe
      http://www.fluorescentpets.com/prod03.htm

    83. Re:Yeah, but... by Mhtsos · · Score: 1

      I've heard this A dog thinks: "Look at these people. They feed me and care for me and love me. They must be gods!" A cat thinks: "Look at these people. They feed me and care for me and love me. I must be god!"

    84. Re:Yeah, but... by zazzel · · Score: 1

      No, at least in Germany there are just as many ppl with allergies. I know many of them :(

      Plus, I think all of the theories about allergy disposition are plain bullshit.

      They completely fail to explain why *I* have so many allergies (the latest test report I got was quite frightening). Whenever I hear of a new therapy, I bookmark it for later use, since I was put on reserve medication this year for the first time. None of the usually available medication worked any more, springtime was quite a horror for me - keeping windows closed, rushing into the car and back, washing the hair and changing clothes whenever I got home...

      First, it was only the cat... than apples, then kiwis, hazelnut, hayfever (various) etc.

      Basically all the fruits I can still eat are mango, pawpaw, pineapple.

      Since dust mites followed, I have constant arguments with my girlfriend because she's not exactly following the rules for ppl. with allergies.

    85. Re:Yeah, but... by mikechant · · Score: 1

      Having had real experience, no you cannot tell a cat what to scratch on. The cat would rather shred your furniture and drapes than scratch the three, expensive, super-fuzzy scratching posts laced with catnip distributed around the house.

      We have a really simple solution. Buy used furniture etc. E.g. our last sofa/couch cost the equivalent of about $60 including delivery and is incredibly comfy and virtually mint condition. The cats can happily scratch it to pieces for the next few years, then we'll just get another one. Saves us loads of money and keeps the cats happy.

    86. Re:Yeah, but... by arivanov · · Score: 1
      Imagine a Siamese with a pleasant disposition! Maybe they could splice in some dog genes to get a cat that wags it's tail and plays fetch.

      Most male ones are with pleasant disposition. In fact they are more doglike in their behaviour if you do _not_ neuter them. You can train them to fetch and you can train them to attack on command. One exemption - never ever try to walk between a Siamese male cat and the subject of its advances. You will need some stitches.

      It is the females and the neutered ones that give Siamese their vicious reputation. I am speaking as an ex owner here. It now lives with my mom and attacks anyone who will enter the apartment. Nearly as effective as a guard dog.

      On the subject of allergies - my observation is that they are roughly proportional to the use of carpets in homes. The two countries with highest allergy rates are UK and US. These are the countries where carpet is the standard floor covering. As a comparison Southern Europe where the standard covering is mosaic (if you have more money wood or marble) has asthma and allergy rates which are 10 times less.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    87. Re:Yeah, but... by peterhoeg · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, because one single case (you) is more than enough to dismiss the whole theory...

    88. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dheltzel,

      I think you are the only one that understood the whole idea :-)

    89. Re:Yeah, but... by Moderatbastard · · Score: 0
      ummm, I was born via a c-section and was not breastfed (strikes 1 and 2 against developing a good immune system) and I have absolutely 0 allergies (pets or food) and have never had any sort of throat/lung problems (knock on wood), there goes the c-section theory.
      My uncle smoked 60 cigarettes a day and lived to be 93 when he was run over by a bus while running a marathon. There goes the "cigarettes are bad for you theory".

      There is a documented case of a person jumping out of a plane without a parachute (a burning RAF bomber over Norway, IIRC - he'd decided better to die quickly than slowly). He survived. So much for the "sudden impact with terra firma is fatal" theory.

      In summary - this should be -1: not very good at statistics. Metamoderate accordingly.

      --
      1/3 of jokes get modded OT. If you get the joke, mod 1 in 3 insightful/interesting/underrated to restore karma balance.
    90. Re:Yeah, but... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Replace "cat" with "woman," and you'd have adivce for 99% of men. Although I haven't heard of women being eaten by eagles, so maybe not.

    91. Re:Yeah, but... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      all they have to do is grow a cat that doesn't shed.
      Or piss in the elevator and corridors. Some asshole in my building has one that does that. Presumably the owner doesn't have a mop and/or arms.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    92. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean that cut'n'paste organisms from coorperate labs aren't as tried and true as nature's evolved ones?

    93. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post doesn't make any sense. The OP was referring to declawing cats but you haven't mentioned declawing at all. The OP is right - declawing is barbaric.

      Shall we save you the bother of clipping your finger nails by amputating all your fingers through the 3rd phalanges? Not so keen on that, I guess?

    94. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking americans. Why don't you pluck all the hair out as well? I mean, all the hair on the carpets and furniture *must* been a pain for you.

      Fucking dumbshit americans.

    95. Re:Yeah, but... by Liquid+Len · · Score: 1

      Maybe they could splice in some dog genes to get a cat that wags it's tail and plays fetch

      Actually, I have a cat that plays fetch all the time with a plastic mouse. And I didn't teach her. Problem is I generally tire way before her. After one hour, I've had enough... Not her.
      I wonder how long this game can last with a dog.

    96. Re:Yeah, but... by Ice+Tiger · · Score: 3, Funny

      It easy and safe to clean a cat in the shower provided you have:

      A glass helmet.
      1/4" thick steel vest.
      Rhino hide gloves.

      --
      "Because we are not employing at entry level, offshoring will kill our industry stone dead."
    97. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been owned by a number of Siamese cats in my life. All were pleasant. Two have played fetch.

      A friend had one that could open doors by turning the doorknob (the round ones, not the levers). You have to open the door for stupid dogs!

    98. Re:Yeah, but... by Fex303 · · Score: 1
      I just sat at the dining room table and yelled 'Here Bear, Here Bear'... ... and then I was attacked by a bear.

      And yes, I'm aware that a) that wasn't funny, and b) it's too late anyhow and no-one's gonna read it.

    99. Re:Yeah, but... by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      My cat prefers either those mice covered with rabbit fur, or the plastic rings off of one-gallon milk/water containers. He'll fetch those things all day if your arm doesn't totally wear out. He floows me around, greets me each time I come home, sits in the window watching me when I'm outside in the garage, and brings me a toy to throw around when he wants to play.

      He also knows how to shit in a litterbox, cleans himself well, and won't die (or crap all over the place in protest) if I'm gone a few days, as long as he has food and water - which is more than I can say for most dogs. :) Yeah, I like dogs, too, but the cat's way more convenient...

    100. Re:Yeah, but... by bozendoka · · Score: 1, Funny

      Several years ago my wife picked up a kitten for me for Christmas. She'd heard the old 'throw a blanket over the puppies and take the one that finds it's way out first' idea, and decided that it applied to cats, too. This was the most hyperactive, strong-willed cat I've ever seen (and I've 'owned' a few). She (my wife) ended up training the cat by putting her in a spare room for a timeout when she (the cat) was bad. Problem was, the cat figured it out pretty quick and would bolt for the door as soon as she got in the room. My wife ended up opening the door, tossing the cat to the far corner of the room, and slamming the door shut, which was immediately followed by the sound of the cat slamming into the door full speed. Every time. It got pretty amusing after awhile, and that ended up being one of the best trained cats ever. Oh, and my wife was her (the cat's) faviorite human.

      --
      "You will soon be more aware of your growing awareness." - My first recursive fortune cookie!
    101. Re:Yeah, but... by nevermore94 · · Score: 0

      I realize you are just trying to make a funny, but seriously, I have 2 Siamese cats that are the friendliest cats I have ever met, and they both play fetch. Ever since they were kittens, they would bring me their toys when they wanted to play, and I would toss them across the room. Then, they would tear after them and bring them back. No training required.

      --
      Nevermore.
    102. Re:Yeah, but... by bgarcia · · Score: 2, Funny
      I trained him to jump into my lap when I whistle to get scratched.
      Now see, I would be too scared to let a cat scratch me there, what with all those sharp claws.
      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    103. Re:Yeah, but... by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1

      Please don't reply to my postings while I am drinking coffee...now I have to clean up my desk.

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    104. Re:Yeah, but... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      She got panicky because here in Phoenix cats are called 'coyote treats'.

      I've heard that cats have another problem here in Phoenix: large birds. Apparently, outdoor cats have learned to walk alongside block walls so the birds can't swoop down and grab them.

    105. Re:Yeah, but... by contagious_d · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I figured I would shower my cat one time. I though it was a good idea since they can't climb glass, but just putting the cat in one of those stall showers does NOT work. 6.5 feet is not too high for a cat to jump, and a soaking wet cat that is hanging from a shower stall by his front claws while wailing and uselessly trying to climb glass with his rear claws is just not fun.

      --
      - /home is where the food is.
    106. Re:Yeah, but... by d-rock · · Score: 1

      Completely off-topic, but when we went backpacking in Yellowstone last year we had to watch an informational video on what to do if you see a bear. Halfway through the video they demonstrate that if you see one, speak in a soft, non-threatening voice as you back away slowly. I'll be damned if the guy wasn't saying "Hear Bear, Hear Bear"!

      Derek

      --
      Don't Panic...
    107. Re:Yeah, but... by cmowire · · Score: 1

      Growing up in the Midwest, neither did I.

      However, now that I live in Silicon Valley, it's all different. I didn't even notice the whole "Cats don't *need* to sharpen their claws" bit in the page referenced (quick Google search) because I was convinced without needing to see that.

      I mean, really, is it any surprise that cats need to make adjustment to their primary tools? If they were sentient, I'm sure they'd spend a lot of time maintaining their claws.

      See, the thing is, "declawing" is not as simple as it sounds. It's the removal of the outer digit, not just the claw. Which is a much more violent operation. You are cutting off enough to cause neurological effects like phantom limbs, which is just Not Fun.

      Your toes are useless, right? Wana know what happens when you lop them off? It takes you a while to learn how to walk again, even though you are primarily walking on the sole of your foot. This is even worse for a cat, because they walk on their digits.

      And the last digit of your fingers... Isn't it useful? Do you really want to consider life without it? If I were to chop off the last digit of your finger because you were taking too much crap apart, would you be particularly able to deal with it? I mean, years later you'd probably accept your lot in life about it and be "well adjusted", but is that really necessary?

      Cats have had claws for quite a long time, even on the evolutionary scale. You can't just flip a switch and expect them to be declawed for your convenience, complete with new instincts. Especially when I know plenty of folks who have intact-clawed cats who are able to prevent their cats from dismantling their house. Even the semi-feral ones.

    108. Re:Yeah, but... by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      I live with the claws because I know that she needs them for defense in various situations (dog, gets outside, falls and needs to grip something).

      Cats, like people, are all different. I've had cats in the past that coexisted just fine with claws intact. The current one didn't. Probably too close to being feral, but since my wife insisted it was going to be an inside cat, the claws aren't really needed. Living a long, pampered life without claws is preferable to dying after a couple of weeks of life in my opinion. You're entitled to yours.

    109. Re:Yeah, but... by spiritflare · · Score: 1

      Own A Dog, Feed A Cat!

    110. Re:Yeah, but... by Impotent_Emperor · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it has something to do with obesity. I heard that Germany is number two when it comes to an obesity problem (U.S. being number one).

    111. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 bucks says you won't be allowed to breed the cats you buy from them, or you'll only be able to buy desexed ones.

    112. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cat wags its tail and plays fetch. :-)

    113. Re:Yeah, but... by Suidae · · Score: 1

      I use SoftPaws vinyl claw covers on my cats. They don't bother the cats, they come in fun colors, and they last for several weeks on each claw. I generally only have to put on one or two at a time (the claws don't all shed at the same time), so the cat doesn't object to the process much.

      In the long term its more expensive than declawing, but it makes me happier than putting another cat through declawing, and it preserves the furnature and carpets.

    114. Re:Yeah, but... by debiguana · · Score: 1
      it seems allergies are WAY more common here in North America
      I have found that a lot of people are more hypo-chondriac re allergies than actually having them. Another problem is that we don't eat anywhere near properly, which doesn't help a bit.
  2. Finally, a dog I can love by SIGALRM · · Score: 4, Funny
    The hypoallergenic cat is the first of a planned series of lifestyle pets that ALLERCA will develop over the next few years
    My sincere hope is, Allerca will someday engineer a Yorkie that won't constantly pee on my carpet. Now that would be marketable. Cute yes... but Yorkies are damn monster sprinklers.

    </wishfulthinking>
    --
    Sigs cause cancer.
    1. Re:Finally, a dog I can love by LucidBeast · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't buy the cat either if it peed on the couch. Parent post is modded funny when it actually should be insightfull.

    2. Re:Finally, a dog I can love by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 2, Informative

      My sincere hope is, Allerca [allerca.com] will someday engineer a Yorkie that won't constantly pee on my carpet. Now that would be marketable. Cute yes... but Yorkies are damn monster sprinklers.

      Dear Sigalarm,

      You have raised a very good point, please accept our job offer as Marketing Executive in Allerca.

      We can sell these "Pee Wee" Yorkies to all the fire departments in the country!

      Regards,

      CEO Allerca

    3. Re:Finally, a dog I can love by over_exposed · · Score: 1

      So does this mean that renters won't charge a $400 non-refundable "pet" fee because your cat won't possibly kill the next owner with it's dander?

      --
      "The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
    4. Re:Finally, a dog I can love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I want is a pet that won't excrete at all. That way I don't have to clean up after it, nor let it out during the wee hours of the morning.

    5. Re:Finally, a dog I can love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But more importantly, will they all look like the one from the front page?

    6. Re:Finally, a dog I can love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yorkies, along with Shitty Poos (Shih Tzus), Cock-a-Poos, and other small, long-hair breeds, all fall into the category I call "Paint Roller Dogs". Shove a paint roller handle up their butts and they're perfect for painting textured walls.

    7. Re:Finally, a dog I can love by DogDude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My sincere hope is, Allerca will someday engineer a Yorkie that won't constantly pee on my carpet. Now that would be marketable. Cute yes... but Yorkies are damn monster sprinklers.

      Real simple solution: Don't buy your dog. Purebreds are much, much, much more likely to have genetic problems (like a weak bladder, bad temperment) than mixed breeds. Next time, visit your local shelter or rescue and rescue a nice mutt. You'll be much happier.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    8. Re:Finally, a dog I can love by mikefe · · Score: 1

      Naw, just put them on the floor on their side and use them as a dust mop.

      No need for anything sharp like your paint roller... *Shiver*

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
    9. Re:Finally, a dog I can love by Zugok · · Score: 1

      i could do with a cat which does not drinkout of my dunny. My god he is is just trouble and perhasp I should have just named him that.

      --
      "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
    10. Re:Finally, a dog I can love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's supposed to be funny!

    11. Re:Finally, a dog I can love by Surt · · Score: 1

      The pet fee isn't for killing the next owner, it's for the inevitable damage to the apartment that has to be repaired.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    12. Re:Finally, a dog I can love by supabeast! · · Score: 2, Informative

      A weak bladder is usually the result of poor housetraining, or in the case of many bitches, being spayed too young. One thing a vet will never tell you about getting a bitch spayed is that if you do it before they're a year old, it causes hormonal imbalances that lead to severe bladder control problems. The bladder control problems can be controlled with medication, but the best solution is to wait until the dog is a year old to spay.

      Disclaimer - I do not oppose spaying and neutering pets, just doing it when they're too damned young!

    13. Re:Finally, a dog I can love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      engineer a Yorkie that won't constantly pee on my carpet.

      In my experience its a problem with all small dogs, my mom has three small dogs which pee everywhere.

      OT: funny story the post reminded me: A friend of mine claimed in the game Black & White he once beat his servant creature so badly that it never pooped again. (The game has a punishment/reward system used by the player to "train" the simulated creature)

    14. Re:Finally, a dog I can love by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      One day you'll be killed in the blast when it finally explodes.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    15. Re:Finally, a dog I can love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit. Having rescued many dogs from shelters over the years (many of them were puppies), I never had any problems with bladder control when getting them fixed at a young age. How about a link?

    16. Re:Finally, a dog I can love by DogDude · · Score: 1

      A weak bladder is usually the result of poor housetraining, or in the case of many bitches, being spayed too young. One thing a vet will never tell you about getting a bitch spayed is that if you do it before they're a year old, it causes hormonal imbalances that lead to severe bladder control problems. The bladder control problems can be controlled with medication, but the best solution is to wait until the dog is a year old to spay.

      That's a total and complete myth. Point to the study that proves this, and then we'll talk. Otherwise, you're just perpetuating another myth that encourages pet overpopulation.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    17. Re:Finally, a dog I can love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be happy with one that doesn't lick all the time..

  3. Hyper-Allergenic by fembots · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wait until one mistake that turns these cute little kittens into Hyper-Allergenic.

    On a more serious note though, I think everybody has her/his ideal world in mind, and this GE is offering the opportunity to achieve that.

    However, like the old saying "One person's meat is another person's poison", I believe there is a reason for such allergy symptoms (maybe telling your body to get away from that bleeming cat?), and without this warning, I wonder if the still-allergic-to-cat person will suffer from far worse sickness because one of the cat allergens wasn't identified and removed?

    1. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Carnildo · · Score: 4, Informative

      However, like the old saying "One person's meat is another person's poison", I believe there is a reason for such allergy symptoms (maybe telling your body to get away from that bleeming cat?), and without this warning, I wonder if the still-allergic-to-cat person will suffer from far worse sickness because one of the cat allergens wasn't identified and removed?

      An allergy, by definition, is an inappropriate immune reaction to a harmless substance. The only thing an allergic reaction is telling you is that your immune system screwed up. Again.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wait until one mistake that turns these cute little kittens into Hyper-Allergenic.

      Don't worry, I hear as long as you don't feed them after midnight, everything will be fine.

    3. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Total_Wimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An allergy, by definition, is an inappropriate immune reaction to a harmless substance. The only thing an allergic reaction is telling you is that your immune system screwed up. Again

      Boy, couldn't disagree more. Evolution doesn't allow such things in they types of numbers we're experiencing. They symptom is almost certainly there for a reason, albeit a reason we may not now fathom.

      That's the real problem with genetic engineering. We can only account for what we know or think we know. Evolution accounts for "everything". When you short circuit evolution on a biosphere level, which we're all too close to doing, you are playing with fire. I would hope that we'd understand that kind of fire before playing. Evidence suggests we do not.

      TW

    4. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Cuthalion · · Score: 1

      Evolution doesn't allow such things in they types of numbers we're experiencing.

      You're trying to tell me that there's an evolutionary benefit to being nearsighted? After all look how many people are!

      Evolution is pretty sloppy. It doesn't 'account for' anything, except for whether creatures die before reproducing instead of afterwards.

      --
      Trees can't go dancing
      So do them a big favor
      Pretend dancing stinks!
    5. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Shadarr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's also interesting to note that "hypo-allergenic" has no medical definition. People assume it means the product will be safe for allergy sufferers, but there is no certification process because there is no such thing, from a medical perspective, as hypo-allergenic. Not such a big deal when you're talking about a $5 bar of soap, but I suspect people will be pretty pissed if their $3500 designer pet turns out to make them just as itchy as the free kitten their cousin offered them.

    6. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boy, couldn't disagree more. Evolution doesn't allow such things in they types of numbers we're experiencing. They symptom is almost certainly there for a reason, albeit a reason we may not now fathom.

      I can just imagine the reason. Ugh is sneezing again! This could only mean wild pussy cats are going to rub on our legs and charge us with static so when we make hot monkey love tonight my yahoo will be shocked flacid. Thanks Ugh!

    7. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Angostura · · Score: 1

      So let's get this clear. You believe my allergy to tree pollen is an appropriate immune response, and it is telling me that I should go out and cut down some trees?

      No, thought not. There are many plausible reasons for my tree allergy, including other environmental factors, the antigens I was subjected too as a baby etc.

      But it has nothing to do with the trees. Likewise an allergic response to cat spit.

      And yes, I am dubious about unregulated GM - but your argument is pretty specious.

    8. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by joggle · · Score: 1
      Evolution doesn't allow such things in they types of numbers we're experiencing.

      Why not? The very great majority of allergies are not life-threatening. Evolution never evolves perfect organisms, simply strives towards evolving organisms that reproduce well.

      Just for an easy example, what benefit do appendixes give to humans? How many people would die every year from appendicitis if it wasn't for modern surgery (modern meaning within the last 100-150 years)?

    9. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by vivin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't put water on them either. Now you know why cats don't like water. Hmmm?? Hmmm??

      --
      Vivin Suresh Paliath
      http://vivin.net

      I like
    10. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by trentblase · · Score: 1
      you are playing with fire. I would hope that we'd understand that kind of fire before playing

      Is that the same kind of fire we as a civilization harness on a regular basis? You know, lighters, camp fires, rockets to space. Now that's FIRE, baby!

    11. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is good to be careful, and I agree that society's attitude toward GE is too ignorant and accepting. However, as someone who suffers greatly from essentially unavoidable allergens (dust mites and mold), I'd be really interested in a good theory as to what my body is trying to tell me. Haven't found one yet, and I try to shut it the hell up by use of offbrand Claritin and excessive climate control.

      Frankly, I'm 95% convinced that the high rate of allergy is due simply to the fact that we've, mostly through hygiene and sanitation, taken care of so many threats that our adaptive immune systems are over-reacting to stimuli that resemble threats for some quirky reason. Of course, one could study how `close' allergen proteins are to really dangerous proteins to back this up.

      In a more general sense, remember that evolution responds to IMMINENT selective pressures; it is not "efficient" in any sense, nor is it "responsible". Check this one out: Worms Treat Ulcerative Colitis!

    12. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      Evolution doesn't allow such things in they types of numbers we're experiencing.

      You are assuming that we aren't interfering with the process of natural selection. Allergy medicine and associated medical knowledge directly interferes with this. That having been said, I can't say I'm entirely convinced that the rise in allergic responses among humans is entirely genetic. It is also likely a factor of the body's response to certain elements in the environment that are not really related to the allergens. IE, maybe pollution?

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    13. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Kenshin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Evolution doesn't allow such things in they types of numbers we're experiencing.

      Evolution doesn't account for modern living.

      In theory, poeple with severe allergies (or similar conditions) would be wiped out by natural selection, removing that from the gene pool. But our standards of life nowadays allow people to lead full lives that they wouldn't be able to otherwise.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    14. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Total_Wimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're trying to tell me that there's an evolutionary benefit to being nearsighted? After all look how many people are!

      Yep, pretty much. There's even an evolutionary advantage to dieing.

      Sometimes an advantage is a long term statistical advantage based on past compensation and possible future compensation for a long gone threat. Sometimes it's a group advantage so that one person's individual disadvantage is of bennefit to the group.

      Think of nearsightedness. Would that help you do close in work? But you couldn't hunt very well, could you? Maybe your tribe-mate is far-sighted. He'd be a better hunter, but not too good at close-in work like sewing.

      I'm not actualy saying this is the reason, but it's a plausible, possible reason for a very common "disadvantage." The fact that you immediatly called this "disadvantage" bad is the exact reason GE scares me. You, and so many like you, miss important big-picture issues while you mechanically select for your "advantages." When you do this, you risk our entire biosphere by picking the wrong ones.

      What would happen if you selected for high metabolism so people wouldn't be so fat? Great for now, but what would happen if food were to become scarse again? You'd basically doom us all. I'm not saying this cat is the end of civilization, but the changes GE brings have the potential to be far more risky in the long run than most people realize.

      TW

    15. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Lucidus · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth: virtually all near-sightedness is caused by early childhood experience (i.e., reading) which affects the structure of the eye as it develops. Far-sightnedness, on the other hand, tends to be genetic in origin.

    16. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our new euthanasia overlords. Again.

    17. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by arose · · Score: 1

      Not that there's much natural-selection in the human race anymore.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    18. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      In theory, poeple with severe allergies (or similar conditions) would be wiped out by natural selection, removing that from the gene pool. But our standards of life nowadays allow people to lead full lives that they wouldn't be able to otherwise.

      Too true. In an answer to a previous post about nearsightedness I neglected to point out that glasses short-circuit quit a lot of selection that would otherwise be going on. I'm definately not suggesting we shoudl ban glasses. I wear glases and would be in real trouble if I didn't.

      But that's not the same thing as "fixing" my "bad sight gene". One fix (the glasses) changes only me while the other "fix" changes a potentially huge number of my decendents. I would be denying the statistical possibility of a world-changing "defect" bennefiting mankind at some future point. No, I can't tell you how my bad eyes might bennefit mankind, but I can tell you that it's massively bone-chilling chutspah to think I know more about the subject then the collective work of millions of years of evolution.

      TW

    19. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > For what it's worth: virtually all near-sightedness is caused by early childhood experience (i.e., reading) which affects the structure of the eye as it develops. Far-sightnedness, on the other hand, tends to be genetic in origin.

      Horseshit. They're both genetic.

    20. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by kwalker · · Score: 1

      Right, just like asthma and near-sightedness. More and more people have those. Must be evolution...

      --
      ... And so it comes to this.
    21. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by cmowire · · Score: 1

      Naw, there's an even better theory...

      The current leading theory is that we are too damn clean. As kids, our immune system isn't exposed to *enough* stuff for it to develop properly, so it starts to think that innocuous substances are harmful.

    22. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by kbranch · · Score: 0

      Think of nearsightedness. Would that help you do close in work? But you couldn't hunt very well, could you? Maybe your tribe-mate is far-sighted. He'd be a better hunter, but not too good at close-in work like sewing.

      Nearsighted people have average eyesight up close and below average eyesight at a distance. Farsighted people are the exact opposite. In either case, your vision isn't any better than the average person's in any situation. Nice try, though.

      You seem to be confusing evolution with something sentient. Evolution doesn't have any plan at all. Organisms with minor flaws (like most allergies) can often reproduce without any problem, so they don't get weeded out.

    23. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by sugar+and+acid · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wrong. The immune system is a very powerful system in our bodies that is simply designed to identify nasty pathogens in our body, and kill them with extreme prejudice. Now an allergy is simply an inappropriate reaction by the immune system something that is present in the environment but is not actually a risk to us, like pollen and food. Basically through some process that is not well understood the immune system was supposed to learn that these things are not a threat and should be ignored, except they often are not. Even more extreme example of the immune system making a complete balls up is autoimmune diseases like type 1 diabetes and ms, where the immune system gets so wayward it actually attacks the body itself and kills off some important component, for example the cells that make insulin.

    24. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by cmowire · · Score: 1

      You know, being somewhat pedantic, I always wondered.... if you can't feed them after midnight, when can you START feeding them the next day?

      And how do they handle daylight savings time and moving between time zones? I mean, the notion of DST is really an invented thing with absolutely no bearing on "real" time (i.e. the position of the sun in the sky at a given moment in time) and it should be banned.

    25. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying this cat is the end of civilization, but the changes GE brings have the potential to be far more risky in the long run than most people realize.

      You do realize that cats and all other domestic animals have been genetically engineered since before the ancient Egyptians?

    26. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that everyone has children?

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    27. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? How is this insightful? There's no medical definition for firearm either, doesn't mean we can't sell something as a firearm. They are clearly advertising their product unambiguously (From the site):

      These cats will allow some of the millions of people allergic to cats to enjoy the love and companionship of a household pet without suffering from allergy symptoms.

      And so, if it leaves you itchy, they are still liable for false advertising (Ok, they are careful to say "some" of the millions...).

      "Organic" means something very different in commerse vs. chemistry, but there are regulations against selling "organic" produce just because it happens to be made from hydrocarbon chains.

    28. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Total_Wimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You seem to be confusing evolution with something sentient. Evolution doesn't have any plan at all.

      Ah, but evolution does have a plan. The plan is: Whatever survives and reproduces gets to go to the next level.

      The thing is, surviving and reproducing are far more complicated than many sentients happen to think. They think they can label traights "good" and "bad" willy-nilly and have a good chance of being right.

      Humanity has figured out a lot of stuff, but there's a lot of other stuff we haven't figured out. Why do we think we know so much about living organisms that we're willing to risk every future generation on our best current guess?

      TW

    29. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by shawb · · Score: 1

      I can't tell you how my bad eyes might bennefit mankind

      For one, near sighted people are a lot better at using a microscope. The lens of an eye acts as, you guessed it, a lens. Being nearsighted means that an object has to be closer to your eye to focus on it. This essentially translates into a larger image cast on your retina for a given size object.

      Conversely, a farsighted person would be better at using a telescope.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    30. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      You do realize that cats and all other domestic animals have been genetically engineered since before the ancient Egyptians?

      Do you realize the rate of extinctions in the modern age? What makes you think your question is not connected to my question?

      As humans continue to "improve" our surroundings, the very surroundings have a tendency to crumble under the weight of the improvements. That is because we only select for the traights we want at the moment and not the traights that bennefit the ecosystem. Now that we have the capability of making far larger "improvements" much more quickly, we also have the capability to hasten the crumbling to such a rate that it will be difficult ot escape any collapse.

      TW

    31. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Skevin · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, it is now known that the appendix helps to digest tough foods such as tree bark. Most people don't need theirs, but I do: I like to chew on raw cinnamon.

      Solomon

      --
      "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
    32. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I have to disagree that evolution is always right. Maybe that's more true in the long run, but certainly not in the short run. The appendix is, IIRC, a remnant of something useful that we no longer need, but since it is still there it can kill people. As above, poor vision is not an advantage. As a society we have managed to keep people alive and allow them to breed simply because we have excess resources to do so. People with Down's Syndrome would not survive in the wild. It's a defect.

      On the other hand, I totally agree that "playing God" is dangerous for those of you who aren't one. When not only is the genome mapped, but every gene explained in detail, then you might be able to do it properly. Hopefully in the mean time you will only make defective animals, and not all-devouring mutants. (And hopefully there will still be pureblood cats around when you need them.)

      Personally, I like my cat pure and natural. We have compatible flaws, so we get along very well.

    33. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      As kids, our immune system isn't exposed to *enough* stuff for it to develop properly, so it starts to think that innocuous substances are harmful.

      OK, I can buy that.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    34. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Agripa · · Score: 1

      From what I have read and studied, the original poster is correct; allergies are caused by an inappropriate reaction of the immune system.

      There was recent news about a parasitic worm they were breeding which when introduced to the human body, caused the part of the immune system which cause allergies to consentrate on it instead.

      In one of my genetics books they talk about it from the evolutionary perspective with the theory that modern man has allergy problems because the rate of parasitic infection is much lower. It was not that the genes had changed significantly. It was the environment and specifically the lack of parasites which changed while the human body was still prepaired to fight them.

    35. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we wait until we "gain" the extra hour this weekend?

    36. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by quetzalc0atl · · Score: 1

      the IgE antibody is the one primarily involved in immune response. This antibody is also found to be in elevated levels in those with parasitic infections...so the idea of introducing proteins from a parasite that those antibodies will bind to may make some sense.

      then again, this may lead to plasma cells making even _more_ IgE...

      an alternative theory is that allergies are the price that we pay for vaccination. for example lets say that i want to raise an antibody against a protein; there may be a particular type of protein that i wish to study, and having an antibody will let me identify it. well, the tried and true method of doing this is to take a fragment of that protein and inject it into an animal...repeatedly. then take the blood serum and purify the antibodies. each time the animal is innoculated you will get a more massive immune response, which in this case is desired.

      it may possible be that by being vaccinated for the same thing over and over again (which we in the USA are - which also have a much larger percentage of allergies than other parts of the world) we develop an oversensitized immune system.

    37. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by quetzalc0atl · · Score: 1

      > the IgE antibody is the one primarily involved in >immune response

      i meant to say in ALLERGIC immune response...

    38. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Shadarr · · Score: 1
      The reason it's important is that without a medical definition, the word can be used for anything. One company may do rigorous testing of the cats for known allergens while another may just wash them with Head and Shoulders prior to sale. Both can use the word "hypoallergenic" because as far as the FDA is concerned it's just marketing buzz, like "new and improved".

      Your example of "organic" is very apt. There are rules you have to follow before you can offer an organic product. One of them is that you can't have used pesticides on the land where the produce was grown at any time during the previous ten years. There are no such standards for hypoallergenic.
      "And so, if it leaves you itchy, they are still liable for false advertising"
      Wrong, you are SOL because they don't say it won't cause a rash, they say its hypoallergenic, which has no meaning. They could as easily say that their new cats are 100% cromulent. Try proving that they're not.
    39. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

      Except that sometimes, evolution just simply fucks up. Can we say "vestigial organs"? What about cancer, you could make the same idiotic claim that, since lots of people have cancer, it's obvious that it's an evolutionary product that serves some higher good. It's thinking like this that underlies Creationist thinking: the incessant need to find a reason or purpose or explanation for everything. In their case they do it in order to justify their beliefs. Quite simply, evolution doesn't THINK. It simply is. It's not even a law or theory as much as it is a simple process; a description for certain events that have a tendency to happen. The human genetic code isn't some shrine to higher thought or order, anymore than the code in Windows is. Both have more than their fair share of fuckups, plain and simple.

    40. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of nearsightedness. Would that help you do close in work? But you couldn't hunt very well, could you? Maybe your tribe-mate is far-sighted. He'd be a better hunter, but not too good at close-in work like sewing.

      I can't belive no-one pointed this out, but you're completely wrong about what near-sighted and far-sighted mean. They refer to where the focal point of your lens is (whether it's too far forward or behind), and thus which way you need to correct.

      Near-sighted people do not see better close up than people with normal vision. They see worse. Same with far-sighted people and distance vision. And yes, I'm near-sighted, so I know.

    41. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Do you realize the rate of extinctions in the modern age?

      Yes. It's probably slower than the rate of extinctions in previous ages from what I've read. Evolution is an ongoing experiment.

      What makes you think your question is not connected to my question?

      If I didn't think they were connected, I would not have connected them with my comment.

      As humans continue to "improve" our surroundings, the very surroundings have a tendency to crumble under the weight of the improvements. That is because we only select for the traights we want at the moment and not the traights that bennefit the ecosystem.

      I guess that's a matter of opinion as to which traits benefit the ecosystem, since we are the beneficiaries of the ecosystem. The real point of this argument is your fear of genetically engineered cats. My point is that engineered cats, cattle, or tomatoes are benign. It's been done for centuries. The thing to be frightened of is people playing with bacteria or viruses. The most deadly killer would be something we couldn't see or guard against. Think about a brand new flu bug introduced suddenly.

    42. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by ComputerSherpa · · Score: 1
      Evolution is an ongoing experiment.

      Really? Who's doing it? Who's the experimenter?

      --
      Information wants to be anthropomorphized!
    43. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Daneurysm · · Score: 1

      I don't neccesarily agree with the phrasology of this post, but, of the thread it makes the most logical sense.

      As such, mod parent up.

    44. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by numark · · Score: 1

      Allerca claims that the vast majority of cat allergies are related to a protein in the saliva of cats. Their goal is to make a cat that doesn't produce this protein (which they also say isn't at all required for the cat's well-being) and therefore stop the allergen. Of course, this is all a matter of debate, and going on just Allerca's claims is very tenuous indeed.

      --
      Want Slashdot headlines on your site? Try SlashHead
    45. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is complete utter BS.

    46. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by tigress · · Score: 1

      Oh, I know how it is. I accidentally sent the wrong mailbox to sa-learn and now my mailserver gets a sneezing fit whenever someone sends me a mail about topless filking.

      And, I'm allergic to nuts too. Two years in techsupport nearly killed me off.

    47. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by mikechant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Question: Is it true or is it now discredited that there is some sort of correlation between near-sightedness and some measures of intelligence, which is believe to be due to the relevant genes being related or something?

    48. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Alioth · · Score: 1

      On the contrary. Modern living is part of evolution - it makes individuals more likely to live long enough to reproduce.

    49. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Cuthalion · · Score: 1

      Is this an accurate summary:

      Anything that is evolved which we do not recognize as beneficial can be chocked up to our inability to realize what's REALLY good for an organism in the long run. Any counter-example of a destructive genetic trait (tendency towards alcoholism, depression) can be written off as 'oh, there's a benefit, we just don't understand it'.

      Seriously, this is basically the same as one of the weaker arguments some religious folks use to defend against the "Problem Of Evil" (how can evil exist if there's an omnipotent benevolent god).

      How about this: Humanity's tendency to muck around with crap we don't understand! Is that ultimately beneficial? Is it something which was not created evolutionarily? Is it not beneficial?

      --
      Trees can't go dancing
      So do them a big favor
      Pretend dancing stinks!
    50. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Really? Who's doing it? Who's the experimenter?

      You haven't figured it out yet? It's time for you to leave now, Sherpa, and follow your own path to enlightenment. The short answer is 42, but YMMV.

    51. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Genome by Matt Ridley had the section on the genetics involved with allergic reactions and an observation by someone in the field that people who had tapeworm infections did not have allergies. Follow up reseach showed that introducing a parasitic infection significantly reduced allergic reactions where they were normally present.

      I ran across the article discussing the breeding of a harmless parasite for medical use in combating allergies in a news story on the net. I think it was some type of worm normally found in pigs which makes sense from the cross species view.

    52. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by ComputerSherpa · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think I know. Just wondering how a supposedly non-sentient force of nature could be considered an experiment, and if so, by whom.

      --
      Information wants to be anthropomorphized!
    53. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      So you think your presence is the result of completely random chance interaction of energy and chemicals, and your life has no real purpose, value, or meaning? Interesting. Why do you choose to continue living a pointless, often painful existence?

    54. Re:Hyper-Allergenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prove it.

  4. well by syrinx · · Score: 4, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new genetically-engineered cat overlords.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    1. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We actually don't care if you welcome us or not, so long as you clean the litterbox.

      Now, rub my belly. And fetch my catnip.

      Sincerely,

      The Management

    2. Re:well by b1scuit · · Score: 1

      But how else would I keep my (allergic to everything) ex-girlfriend from wanting to come over all the time!?! This is terrible! Now I have to grow ragweed. The cat was definitely more fun. Way to ruin it for the rest of us, Allerca. Sheesh.

    3. Re:well by mikefe · · Score: 1

      Is it true this comes from the simpsons?

      Because if it is, please tell me so I can wring homer's neck TYVM.

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
    4. Re:well by kfg · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new genetically-engineered cat overlords.

      Allow me to introduce you to the K'zinti mothership. . . as a playtoy.

      Remember to squeak when we bite. We like it when you squeak.

      KFG

    5. Re:well by joeslugg · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, the cat is allergic to YOU!

    6. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and it's right over the shark - again.

    7. Re:well by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      But don't forget to screen out the crazy humans first...otherwise you'll end up bringing in that one human who is willing to suicide in the anti-matter drive just to destroy the whole ship. (I actually don't remember if that short story had K'zinti in it or just some other cat-like carnivore species- but it's the one thing that made my childhood liveable, and I WILL find it again before my son hits school).

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    8. Re:well by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

      Kent: We're just about to get our first pictures from inside the
      spacecraft with "average-naut" Homer Simpson, and we'd like to
      -- aah!
      [Camera shows a close-up of an ant floating in front of the
      three astronauts]
      Everyone: Aah!
      Kent: Ladies and gentlemen, er, we've just lost the picture, but,
      uh, what we've seen speaks for itself. The Corvair spacecraft
      has been taken over -- "conquered", if you will -- by a master
      race of giant space ants. It's difficult to tell from this
      vantage point whether they will consume the captive earth men
      or merely enslave them. One thing is for certain, there is no
      stopping them; the ants will soon be here.
      And I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords. I'd like to
      remind them that as a trusted TV personality, I can be helpful
      in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar
      caves.
      Marge: Mmm, don't worry, kids. I'm sure your father's all right.
      Lisa: What are you basing that on, Mom?
      [pause]
      Marge: [with forced cheer] Who wants ginger snaps?

    9. Re:well by mikefe · · Score: 1

      Now that was funny. Now, where did my shot gun go so I can kill Kent and his legion...

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
  5. $3500... by Big+Mark · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and you've still got to housetrain the bastard.

    1. Re:$3500... by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Funny

      $3500 for a cute kitten.

      $250 but for dress shoes.

      Stepping in a pile of cat hairball vomit. Priceless.

    2. Re:$3500... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get your joke, but don't forget that cats, unlike dogs, are born housetrained - just one of their many advantages. :)

    3. Re:$3500... by mctanis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mine did, and that was nearly 5 years ago.

      Seriously, the cats searched around the house until they found "sand" -- pawed at it for a few minutes, then were good to go.

      No accidents yet -- although I keep hearing about the accidents that my "dog person" friends have with their dogs every other day from (being in the house a measly 8hrs.)

    4. Re:$3500... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much, yes. Every one of the probably 25 cats I, my friends, and my family have owned simply needed to be set in the cat box once or twice when you first bring them home so they know where it is, and then they go back there to do their business. Not one of those cats had an "accident."

      Now, I guess you could consider the 1 minute or so (literally) you spend setting them in the box to make sure they know about it "training", but comparing that to what a dog requires makes that seem even more absurd.

    5. Re:$3500... by bluesangria · · Score: 1

      Yes. Yes, indeed they do. I found an orphaned kitten that was still nursing and didn't even have teeth. At three weeks of age, it could barely walk, but it darn well found and used the litter box I put in there for it. It is instinctive. blue

    6. Re:$3500... by Proney · · Score: 1

      They're not always interested in the litter box over anything else... My cats have been known to piddle in the house, and even prefer to use the bathtub rather than her clean litter box.

      --
      require "something.clever";
    7. Re:$3500... by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1

      Um, yes. They have built-in food-dish homing devices as well, so you don't have to train them to find that either.

      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    8. Re:$3500... by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      When people waste money its good for the economy. I don't know about all this genetic engineering and patenting DNA is way over the top, but shit, this company might be in to make a mint and i want in! (they really have to make these things must have items like iPods)

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    9. Re:$3500... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $250 for dress shoes? I couldn't even buy a pair of socks for that much.

      You must be one of the proletariat.

    10. Re:$3500... by skitzoid+(moomoo) · · Score: 0

      Watching the little cunt get run over

      -$3500 down the drain.

    11. Re:$3500... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried different kinds of litter? Most cats don't care, but some are picky. If it's not just a behavioral problem you may find relief by just purchasing a different kind of litter each time you run out until you hit one that the cats find acceptable.

      I know my cat never had a problem, but one time I accidentally grabbed the wrong box of Tidy Cat (it was larger grain, non-scoopable) and he took issue with it. Not going all over the house or anything, but occasionally just outside his box or (as yours do) in the bathtub.

      Just a thought...

    12. Re:$3500... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I totally agree, if by "helping their fellow man" you mean "hookers and beer".

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    13. Re:$3500... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cat didn't have accidents in the house, he had purposes. We've got a pet door that leads to the backyard and the cat could go out any time of day or night. We didn't have a litterbox because he usually went outside. But every now and then he'd COME INSIDE so that he could go to the bathroom in plants, planters, the fireplace, on the living room sofa (it still smells),... . Fscking cat.

    14. Re:$3500... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see you hold it for 8 measly hours.

    15. Re:$3500... by cakefool · · Score: 1

      I've had cats for a total of 4cat/years now, and never once has either of them had a hairball - could be because I groom them every couple of days. Not just for their good - its a miracle de-stresser.

  6. Now... by DarkHelmet · · Score: 4, Funny

    If only they'd genetically engineer fashion models to like nerds... Overweight fetishes are a plus.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:Now... by Zemrec · · Score: 1

      Wow, that'd be the ultimate mail-order bride. If its $3500 for a GE kitten, how much for a GE wife? And I wonder if there'll be loans available.

    2. Re:Now... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Hmm...that reminds me of "Dark Angel." One Jessica Alba model, please.

    3. Re:Now... by cachorro · · Score: 2, Informative

      Due to the latency between invention and delivery (and presupposing several generations of testing), I suspect that we will not see this in our lifetime.

      The consolation is that it is commonly accepted that fashion models are over-rated, although I would need to perform direct testing to confirm that hypothesis.

    4. Re:Now... by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      If only they'd genetically engineer fashion models to like nerds...

      We've already got the genetic template; Claudia Schiffer.

    5. Re:Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to hell with that.

      I dont care what she looks like, just as long as she's not against a three way with her cute friend or sister.

    6. Re:Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess they already have this Realdoll, The World's finest Love Doll. [www.realdoll.com]

  7. Food by Lifthrasir · · Score: 1
    Yes, but with all of the fuss about GM food, will this actually be good for you?

    mmmm, time to go and get some satay :)

    --
    No beer, no TV make Lifthrasir something something
    1. Re:Food by Gonarat · · Score: 1

      I assume you mean GE food, unless you buy your food from Pontiac....

      Actually, this is great. I don't think I would want to pay $3500 for a Kitty since I'm not allergic to them (plus I already have 4 standard Kitties), but what I would really like to see is a cat or dog that lives 30 - 40 years (quality years, without getting old). The hardest part of having a pet is having to say goodbye after 10-15 years for a dog, 12-20 years for a cat.

      It would be worth the extra cost for an (almost) lifetime pet.

      --
      Beware of Sleestak
    2. Re:Food by swollkin · · Score: 1

      I really don't like this idea at all, to be honest. Yes, it's hard to let go of pets, but the world already has enough unloved cats and dogs as it is. Once there are genetically modified designer pets out there the proplem will only be worse.

      These thoughts make me sad: that one day perhaps you'll have the choice to buy a normal cat, or if you pay a few hundred dollars more, a cat that will be extra healthy, or live longer. Maybe you can't afford it, so you buy the normal cat, and 15 years later you look at your sad, ailing cat and think "Fluffy might not be dying now if I ponied up the cash." Terrible.

      I actually would be curious to see what the slashdot community says about what we can do to prevent the arrival of genetically modified pets. The thought is really distressing to me, to be honest.

    3. Re:Food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of logic is that, exactly? 'I'll feel bad that I can't afford it so no one else should be able to have it too'?

      There are some arguments against GE pets that I can understand, but the one you just expressed is definitely not one of them.

    4. Re:Food by SoCalChris · · Score: 1

      No beer, no TV make Lifthrasir something something

      Go crazy?

    5. Re:Food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I assume you mean GE food, unless you buy your food from Pontiac....

      GM == Genetically Modified. GE at least makes fridges...

    6. Re:Food by HaloZero · · Score: 1

      GM, in this instance, is an acronym for 'Genetically Modified'. Though, there have been times when my beans did taste and smell like an old Saturn.

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
    7. Re:Food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not exactly the same sort of pet, but if lifespan is what you're after, look at the bigger birds. Some alive now will live long enough to attend your funeral.

    8. Re:Food by Lifthrasir · · Score: 1

      No, i did mean GM. As in Genetically Modified.

      --
      No beer, no TV make Lifthrasir something something
  8. And what happens... by advocate_one · · Score: 5, Interesting

    when owners start breeding from them and selling on the kittens??? Will there be a strict EULA that forbids the owner from breeding and that they must have them neutered at the first available opportunity???

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    1. Re:And what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple solution: only sell the pets castrated.

    2. Re:And what happens... by Akai · · Score: 4, Informative

      One word for you: Monsanto

      They prosecute people who illegally grow their GE corn/etc.

      I'm sure the same applies.

      Hell, last time I bought a rose bush for my lady it had a warning on it that it was illegal to propigate without permissions.

      --
      Please send all UCE to scally@devolution.com so I can f
    3. Re:And what happens... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      For $3700, I would hope that they'd come pre-neutered.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:And what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That ought to be modded as funny or something of the sort. Irony.

      If you buy any kind of breed pet *today*, as it is, you've got to sign a nice piece of paper forbidding you from breeding your new 2000 dollar Persian Blue and then neuter the thing at the available time.

    5. Re:And what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should imagine that they will come to us sterile. If they're smart enough to GE them to be non-allergenic, they're smart enough to get rid of the ability to re-produce, even if it's through surgical (ie Neutering) means.

    6. Re:And what happens... by Rad+Adam · · Score: 1
      Even if they do restric the breeding of two of the hypoallergenic cats could you not take the loop hole? Breed a hypoallergenic cat with a normal cat. In turn you get a cat that has 1/2 the allergic capabilities! Consider you sell for half the cost ... that's not a bad deal. ^^

      Rad Adam

      P.S. Yes, I did some how pass the portion of genetics ... somehow.

      --
      "So Lonestar, now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb."
    7. Re:And what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q: What do you get when you crossbreed an Allerca cat with Monsanto corn?

      A: A cat that brings a whole new meaning to the word 'stalk'... and 'ear' for that matter :-)

    8. Re:And what happens... by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1

      Easy to prevent - sell only neutered kittens. They can be neutered at a very early age.

    9. Re:And what happens... by aembleton · · Score: 1

      Allerca Inc will probably sell them already neutered.

    10. Re:And what happens... by khendron · · Score: 4, Informative

      Probably. You buy any pure bred cat nowaday you have to sign an agreement that you will have the cat neutered/spayed at the earliest opportunity.

      Pure bred cat breeders don't want you to breed their cats any more than these guys do.

      --
      Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
    11. Re:And what happens... by Mad_Rain · · Score: 1

      Well, why not go all out with the genetic modifiers? Forget just neutered/spayed, make it genetically impossible for them to breed. That'd push the difficulty bar for "illegal cat copying" (AKA "breeding") just that much higher.

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    12. Re:And what happens... by trentblase · · Score: 1

      But then something will go terribly wrong and it'll be Jurrasic Park all over again!

    13. Re:And what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the strict UELA is called cut the cats balls off before you sell it!

    14. Re:And what happens... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

      Check out the EULA here -> Reservations

      Here's the part about neutering e. At the discretion of the Company the Cat may be neutered prior to delivery to Purchaser..." Kinda answers that to some degree.

      --
      ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    15. Re:And what happens... by k12linux · · Score: 1
      Depending on the dominant/recessive traits and how many genes are actually involved it would probably be possible to breed a couple of these to non-hypo cats and then cross-bread the decendands, finally ending up with cats that are again hypo-allergenic.

      Since that's true, I wouldn't be a bit surprised to learn that they will be non-breeding cats.

      One thing that bugs me is that they say the $3500 price tag is less than that of some exotic breeds. But if you pay $3500 for a pair of exotic breed cats you aren't restricted from breeding them.

      Then again, maybe they'll be able to breed and then they can sue every time someone's hypo-cat sneaks out and mates with another cat.

    16. Re:And what happens... by chill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting. I have not seen this trend in the purebred dog market.

      My wife sells AKC mini dachshunds and they can run from $300 to $1,500 depending on size, color, conformance, etc.

      HOWEVER, a neutered animal tops out at $250 or so. The majority of the value is breeding potential. This also includes animals we've purchased. I've never seen pets (non-show/breeder, neutered or non-papered) sold for more than $250.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    17. Re:And what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      In Canada they even prosecuted a seed farmer who's crop had gotten contaminated by the Monsanto corn in the next field.

    18. Re:And what happens... by gnuLNX · · Score: 1

      I have not seen it in the pure bred cat market either. No one can make you sign a damned Eula for breeding animals....shit if they can do that then they can do it with humans to. Pure non-sence....would never hold up in a court of law....besides that the cat still has DNA...whats to keep you from using your new cats DNA to fertalize a normal cat.

      --
      what?
    19. Re:And what happens... by Poseidon88 · · Score: 1

      Why bother having people spay/neuter them when you could just engineer them to be sterile?

    20. Re:And what happens... by hysterik · · Score: 1

      I haven't RTFA, but I suspect these will be sold already neutered or spade, to protect their investment.

    21. Re:And what happens... by snark42 · · Score: 1

      I for one hope they are created to be infertile, or at least only sold spayed/neutered. We do not need genetically modified cats of any sort out in the wild.

      In fact, would prefer nothing that could sow itself was genetically engineered and out in the wild, but it's a little later for that now thanks to the likes of Monsanto.

    22. Re:And what happens... by scribblej · · Score: 1

      There already is such an EULA on most "high-end" pets. And on the low-end ones, too -- if you adopt from a shelter, every shelter I've ever been to REQUIRES spay/neuter on adopted pets. Many breeders these days require the same, unless you pay extra for reproduction rights.

      No, I'm not kidding. My mom has been a dog breeder for many years. (No dirty jokes now, this is my MOM we're tlaking about.)

    23. Re:And what happens... by dmaxwell · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. I thought the way they handled it was to attach the high price to having "papers". After all, you can have some ultra 'leet purebred but no one will care unless you have the "papers".

    24. Re:And what happens... by kesuki · · Score: 1

      that's what monsanto did, and the corn cross polinated and created hybrid corn that could reproduce, and had some of the attributes of the monsanto corn. sure cat's aren't exactly the same, but you always risk mutation/failure of the gene to altering to fully sterilize the animal.

    25. Re:And what happens... by DogDude · · Score: 1

      You can thank your wife for personally contributing to the pet overpopulation problem. Dog breeding needs to be outlawed.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    26. Re:And what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cat probably comes shrink-wrapped in legal bullshit, for a start...

    27. Re:And what happens... by cmowire · · Score: 1

      Well, it's also the case that we've got far too many cats and dogs *in general*, so it's really not a good idea to let them breed. I mean, when PETA goes out and says that "nope, we have too many cats, so, despite the fact that we'd kill people to save the animals, we can't see any better way to deal with the cat overpopulation problem than putting 'em down," you know that it's bad. :/

      That, and often times, the ones that *should* breed and enhance the pedigree are not sold, just the ones that don't fit quite so perfectly up to the breed standard.

      Since most of the purebread cat breeders are doing it out of love, not out of fiscal interest, most of these have, thankfully, unselfish reasons.

    28. Re:And what happens... by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Well, why not go all out with the genetic modifiers?

      Quite honestly, most dog & cat breeders are simply too stupid to do such a thing. Breeders are the primary reason why we have such a terrible overpopulation problem in this country. Not only do they encourage people to buy, instead of rescuing, but they usually dump off "bad" litters on the side of the road or at your local pound. On top of that, most breeders can't even spell "genetics", which is why so many purebred dogs and cats you see are so damn unhealthy.
      Dog & cat breeders are true scum. We need to spay & neuter breeders.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    29. Re:And what happens... by kesuki · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that what that means is that allerca will sell most of the cats neuter, but will allow some breeders sign some sort of 'agreement' that says allerca gets x% of the resale price of bred kittens... and require that breeders only sell neuter kittens...
      afterall they're in this to make money, not to replace the job of local cat breeders... as long as they make a cut of the money, they don't care who breeds the cats.

    30. Re:And what happens... by WaKall · · Score: 1

      Maybe they come 'fixed'?

    31. Re:And what happens... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      There already is such an EULA on most "high-end" pets. And on the low-end ones, too -- if you adopt from a shelter, every shelter I've ever been to REQUIRES spay/neuter on adopted pets. Many breeders these days require the same, unless you pay extra for reproduction rights.

      I'm waiting for vets to start unspaying and unneutering pets because of just that sort of thing.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    32. Re:And what happens... by jafac · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have "rescued" 5 dogs in my life.

      Each and every one of them, without exception, pissed on the rug.

      The reason these animals are in the shelter, is because somebody else screwed up in the house-training phase.

      I will never ever again adopt someone else's mistake. My next dog (after my current one expires or runs away) will be a new puppy. And I will make certain that the new puppy is house-trained *RIGHT*.

      And if I fail - then it's off to the animal shelter!

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    33. Re:And what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gene Silencing is the technique they are using. Gene Silencing (http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/ghr/glossary/genesilencing ) is used while the gene in question is being expressed. It will be a treatment provided to the cat and will not be inheritable.

    34. Re:And what happens... by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Well, you don't have to go to a shelter. You can go to a rescue group, so you know what you're getting. Getting a puppy is even worse than getting an adult dog at the shelter. With a puppy, you have no idea what you're getting. Get a rescue dog.

      You may have gotten unlucky with non-housetrained dogs, but I can tell you, that I see at least 25-50 dogs/day, and 9/10 times when a behavior or health problem occurs, it's with some purebred that the stupid owner paid money for.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    35. Re:And what happens... by chill · · Score: 1

      Well...

      On the AKC registration forms there is a box marked "restrictions -- non-breeding". Dogs are cheaper to register this way, and you can get their pedigree, but you'll never be able to register its puppies with the AKC.

      And without the AKC registration papers, purebred doesn't mean anything. You can't show or breed with a registered animal. (Well, you CAN in non-sanctioned shows.)

      Court of law or not, no AKC papers, it don't mean shit.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    36. Re:And what happens... by davidescott · · Score: 1

      Easier solution-- nueter or spay before delivery.

    37. Re:And what happens... by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      Could messing the DNA around be considered encryption? I'm sure they'd love to send DMCA takedown notices to little old ladies!

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    38. Re:And what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I had no idea General Electric was in the corn market.

    39. Re:And what happens... by Tongo · · Score: 1

      Have you watched Jurassic Park lately?!?!

    40. Re:And what happens... by IronChef · · Score: 1

      The animals will undoubtedly be provided pre-neutered.

    41. Re:And what happens... by NoMercy · · Score: 1

      Who wants a damn pedegere, get a nice normal moggie from the rescue center :)

    42. Re:And what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PURRRRRRR-asic Park.

      I'm so ashamed of this I'm posting as AC.

    43. Re:And what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aww...no sexy time? Its animal cruealty I say!

    44. Re:And what happens... by jonbrewer · · Score: 1

      when owners start breeding from them and selling on the kittens??? Will there be a strict EULA that forbids the owner from breeding and that they must have them neutered at the first available opportunity???

      Indeed this happens with dogs today. Our golden retriever came with such a no-breed agreement. She'd have cost over five times her already considerable price if we had wanted to breed her.

      Our cats, on the other hand, have always been adopted from rescue shelters. Some internal bias prevents me from ever considering paying money for a cat. I think it would be slavery...

    45. Re:And what happens... by Maxite · · Score: 1

      > Who wants a damn pedegere, get a nice normal moggie from the rescue center :)

      You mean pedigree, yes? And what the Hell is a "Moggie"? Sounds like the name of someone's really hairy aunt.

      --
      Ah, you found me!
    46. Re:And what happens... by Rie+Beam · · Score: 1

      "Pure bred cat breeders don't want you to breed their cats any more than these guys do."

      I find that ironic - people complain all the time about genetically engineering animals and plants, and how awful it is, and yet don't object to the basic genetic corn-hole that purebreds and other "speciality animals" seem to be subjected to. I dunno, I just find it funny.

      PS: And what per se occurs if the cat is bred? Is it taken by the original owner? Are the kittens killed?

    47. Re:And what happens... by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Genetically Engineered?

    48. Re:And what happens... by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "They prosecute people who illegally grow their GE corn/etc."

      They also prosecute people who *accidentally* grow their GE plants.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    49. Re:And what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you high? I suppose we'll just make it mandatory that everybody will have to carry dog and cat condoms, so if they see two strays doing the nasty they can prevent any possible reproduction.

    50. Re:And what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was a joke.

    51. Re:And what happens... by jareds · · Score: 1

      We do not need genetically modified cats of any sort out in the wild.

      Sorry, you're a few thousand years too late.

    52. Re:And what happens... by syousef · · Score: 1

      when owners start breeding from them and selling on the kittens??? Will there be a strict EULA that forbids the owner from breeding and that they must have them neutered at the first available opportunity?

      Why not just GE the kittens to be sterile in the first place?

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    53. Re:And what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monsanto.. they, as i expect this company, will make the cat 'terminator' cats. That is, they dont procuse viable seeds.. in this case no kittens for you.

    54. Re:And what happens... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, since they genetically engeneer that cat anyway, there's no need for manual neutering. They can just remove some genes necessary for reproduction.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    55. Re:And what happens... by mverwijs · · Score: 1

      Obviously. This firm plans to make money *selling* the poor animals.
      They would be creating their own competition by not neutering them.

    56. Re:And what happens... by julesh · · Score: 1

      A friend recently purchased a Maine Coon kitten. The breeder refused to provide registration / documentation of its pedigree until provide with evidence that it had been neutered. This is perfectly legitimate. Obviously he could have used it to breed from, but it would no longer officially be a Maine Coon if he did so.

    57. Re:And what happens... by mpe · · Score: 1

      when owners start breeding from them and selling on the kittens??? Will there be a strict EULA that forbids the owner from breeding and that they must have them neutered at the first available opportunity???

      It's not as if the cat will take any notice of an EULA. Even if they manage to breed a super intelligent literate cat, it will take one look at it, say "stupid humans" and go back to reading "humans and how to train them". As cats have been doing for the past few thousand years :)

    58. Re:And what happens... by DrXym · · Score: 1
      And how do they tell? Are you expected to throw any kitten progeny into the river? Are you liable if your cat knocks up / is knocked up by some neighbourhood cat? Once this happens, and after say five or six cat generations, the genes will truly be in the wild. Let's hope this genetic manipulation has no harmful side effects, for the cat or anyone else.


      In fact I can't see any way they could possible stop your cat breeding, except the obvious one. And that would probably be what happens. Your expensive cat will be neutered when you get it, thus ensuring it cannot breed. In fact the only gene modified cats that will be able to breed are the ones Allerca have locked up in their cat farm churning out kittens at $3500 a pop.


      Personally I wouldn't buy a pet from a dog / cat farm whether it were hypo-allergenic or not. Frankly I hope the business falls flat on its face.

    59. Re:And what happens... by zardor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But what happens if you take the neutred moggie to your local pet cloning company?
      If this covered under the DCMA?

      --
      -- We don't understand software, and sometimes we don't understand hardware, but we can *see* the blinking lights
    60. Re:And what happens... by mikechant · · Score: 1

      You could get that pet cloning company to clone your GM cat, then breed from the unneutered clone.

      (I'm not saying this is a good idea, just that it could be done).

    61. Re:And what happens... by NoMercy · · Score: 1

      Moggie's are mongrel's but it sounds much more cute :)

    62. Re:And what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, last time I bought a rose bush for my lady it had a warning on it that it was illegal to propigate without permissions.

      The rose bush or the lady?

    63. Re:And what happens... by Kanasta · · Score: 1

      what makes you think they will be able to breed in the 1st place?

    64. Re:And what happens... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Hell, last time I bought a rose bush for my lady it had a warning on it that it was illegal to propigate without permissions.

      That's giving up quite a lot for a freakin' rosebush!

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    65. Re:And what happens... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Rose patents have ben around for a long time. The prohibition on propagation refers only to asexual reproduction (by cuttings, etc.) during the life of the patent. You're pretty much free to grow seeds from that rose (not easy) since they seldom breed true.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    66. Re:And what happens... by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Why not just GE the kittens to be sterile in the first place?

      Because then they'd have to splice or clone each kitten, and it'd be goddamn expensive (to them, looks like it already is for the buyers..)?

      Much cheaper to just let nature take care of creating more cats, and then render them sterile.

    67. Re:And what happens... by plover · · Score: 1
      There are lots of patented plants on the market these days. They typically come with warning tags that say "Asexual reproduction prohibited."

      This means you can't take a cutting and root it to start a new plant; but you're free to let them go to seed and breed them that way. They realize that prohibiting sexual reproduction would probably be challenged in court, but reproduction probably won't hurt them economically because most strains start mutating after only a few generations (and most flower mutations are undesirable anyway.)

      I suppose the same applies to the cats: you probably aren't allowed to take a cutting of them to try to start new kittens ... or maybe they're simply neutered before they're sold to you.

      --
      John
    68. Re:And what happens... by plover · · Score: 1
      Spaying and neutering animals isn't like a surgeon snipping your vas deferens. It actually entails the removal of the reproductive organ. It's a much more effective procedure than simply "tying a knot in the tubes" like they do with people.

      Long way of saying "can't be undone."

      --
      John
  9. Go Governor by Toddimer · · Score: 1

    It's been a whole 5 seconds, and there are no 6th day comments yet! Must be a busy day *sips coffee*

  10. Excellent, and Scary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's quite an accomplishment, and also a little freaky... though it probably won't be an issue so long as they all come spayed or neutered.

    Most promising, however, is that they may someday be able to apply their techniques to produce a Presidential candidate that doesn't make so many voters sick. ;)

  11. Sharks... by Psiren · · Score: 4, Funny

    Call me back when they have lasers on sharks. Then I'll be impressed...

    1. Re:Sharks... by theparanoidcynic · · Score: 1

      Fuck sharks. I want a laser on a hydrophilic cat. That'd be a damn sight more versitile.

      --
      Only in a Slashdot fantasy can a Slackware install turn into several hours of sex . . . . .
  12. allergen-fee by fembots · · Score: 1

    Other genetic methods may produce allergen-fee cats, but these procedures rely on nuclear transfer (cloning)

    Wow, so these cats blackmail their owners, if no fee is paid, they'll release the allergen!

  13. Hypoallermagenic... by daishin · · Score: 1

    I can make my cat like that with a shaver, but he wouldnt like that, and anyone who has cat allergys can just stay away, so yeah, does the cat come in a test-tube and you just have to add water?

    --
    (\_/)
    (O.o) This is Bunny. Add Bunny to your signature
    (> <) to help him achieve world domination.
    1. Re:Hypoallermagenic... by Zooka · · Score: 3, Informative

      " I can make my cat like that with a shaver..."

      It's not really the animals hair/fur that is the most significant allergen, but rather their *dander*. (Dander is flakes of dead skin). Their saliva and urine can also cause an allergic reaction.
      http://www.theallergyreliefcenter.com/animal_aller gy.htm

    2. Re:Hypoallermagenic... by daishin · · Score: 1

      "It's not really the animals hair/fur that is the most significant allergen, but rather their *dander*. (Dander is flakes of dead skin)." You should have told me this BEFORE I bought the razor. j/k

      --
      (\_/)
      (O.o) This is Bunny. Add Bunny to your signature
      (> <) to help him achieve world domination.
    3. Re:Hypoallermagenic... by LightStruk · · Score: 2, Informative

      The allergen is not in the cat hair. Cats generate a protein called Fel d-I in their skin that many humans are allergic to.
      Male cats make more allergen than female cats. My parents keep a female cat in the house as a pet and a male cat in the garage as a mouser, and I've found that cat sensitive people are far more aggravated by the male than the female . . .
      and there's a joke in that last sentence somewhere, I'm sure. :-)

  14. Blue/ Green/Brainy Kitty by Janitha · · Score: 1

    I want a blue/green genetically engineered cat with more brain power. Plus improve their eating habits to eat once per day, and do their dirty work once a day. Welcome to the Genetically Engineered pet era.

    1. Re:Blue/ Green/Brainy Kitty by shawb · · Score: 1

      Well, we already have a floursecent bunny

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  15. Heh... by Burgundy+Advocate · · Score: 3, Funny

    without the cost

    RESTRICTIONS: 'Without cost' offer excludes $3,500 startup fee, prices and participation may vary.

    --
    Dragging people kicking and screaming into reality since 1996.
  16. Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all knew this day would come. Apparently, we can do it. But should we?

  17. Pre-orders of these new cats are outselling PS2s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like dark days ahead for Sony!

  18. Relative expenses... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

    All my family's cats are adopted. 3500 bucks would pay for my allergy medicine (not just to cat dander) for...a while. Probably longer than the lifetime of the cat.

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    1. Re:Relative expenses... by trentblase · · Score: 1

      Some people don't tolerate medication well. Not to mention the toll on your liver... If they could get these cats to not SHED I'd happily take them to the barber every so often.

  19. I'm not sold yet... by pLnCrZy · · Score: 1

    Call me when they have pets that don't require feeding and don't shit in the yard.

    1. Re:I'm not sold yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Pet rock!

    2. Re:I'm not sold yet... by jmanforever · · Score: 1

      "Call me when they have pets that don't require feeding and don't shit in the yard."

      Didn't Sony make a dog like that last year?

    3. Re:I'm not sold yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats been done already - AIBO

    4. Re:I'm not sold yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      My fish never shit in my yard...

    5. Re:I'm not sold yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Careful, or you'll end up with a pet that steals your food and shits on your carpet.

    6. Re:I'm not sold yet... by mikechant · · Score: 1

      The Sony Aibo has been out for several years. And it does require 'feeding' on electricity.

  20. What next by Izanagi · · Score: 1

    When they can genetically engineer a cat to fetch and respond to it's name then sign me up!!

    --
    SCO (noun.)- A Slimy Corporate Ogre. Often seeks free money.
  21. This cat is also Zero-G approved! by smug_lisp_weenie · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:This cat is also Zero-G approved! by gnuman99 · · Score: 1
      The video is actually quite informative. Cats can fall from rather large heights on their legs and not be injured. In the video, when the cat "lands" at the end, you see its legs spread out. During a fall this actually increases drag and saves the cat. The manouvers the cat does in the air is so it falls on its legs.

      The animals that are least adapted to zero-G must be birds...

    2. Re:This cat is also Zero-G approved! by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      Wow, it can't figure out which way is up, to land on its legs, so it keeps spinning.

      It's like watching a program fall into a loop.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    3. Re:This cat is also Zero-G approved! by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Personally, I think this borders on cruelty, what with the guy repeatedly throwing the cat against the wall. Or was I the only one who noticed how fat the cat's tail looked?

    4. Re:This cat is also Zero-G approved! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      i agree. the cat looks really unhappy to me. poor cat!

    5. Re:This cat is also Zero-G approved! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That just adds to the fact that iths godammned funny!

    6. Re:This cat is also Zero-G approved! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is a nasa cat punishment system.

      the cat pissed on a desk so they take it up in zero g and throw it at the wall.

      come on, congress voted on the program and approved it over 5 years ago.

    7. Re:This cat is also Zero-G approved! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Ah MAN that is he funniest thing I've seen in a long time!

      Hehehe, look at that cat spin! :D

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    8. Re:This cat is also Zero-G approved! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Strap a slice of buttered bread to its back and then you'll see some spinning!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    9. Re:This cat is also Zero-G approved! by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Exactly. And what pisses me off on top of that is that now I still don't know if cats would enjoy zero g. I have a sneaking suspision they would, but all I know now is that cats hate being flung hard at walls in zero gravity.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    10. Re:This cat is also Zero-G approved! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      If they had proper zero-G rather than the cheap 90 second version, they should have released the cat and a bunch of mice. Then put the Blue Danube on the stereo. Then watch--but no eating chips!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    11. Re:This cat is also Zero-G approved! by Dorsai65 · · Score: 0

      I think the cat was more pissed about being in zero gravity than being tossed around.

      --
      --- Asking inconvenient questions for over 30 years...
    12. Re:This cat is also Zero-G approved! by Thu25245 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yes, the cat looks pretty miserable. I enjoyed it immensely.

      (I routinely have to chase neighborhood cats away from my "prey-animal" pets.)

    13. Re:This cat is also Zero-G approved! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was throwing it at the 'wall' to make it feel like it was falling. It was only during those moments when it was flying towards a surface that it felt like it knew what was going on.

      Cats wouldn't enjoy zero g. They get upset when you move the furniture, ffs.

    14. Re:This cat is also Zero-G approved! by StikyPad · · Score: 0

      I completely agree.

      They needed more cats.

    15. Re:This cat is also Zero-G approved! by Suidae · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a cat-lover, I'd say the cat appeared more distressed about the micro-g environment than the throwing part. It looked fairly unpreturbed after the first toss, it appeared to be that part after the second toss where it couldn't hang on to the 'floor' that really got it annoyed.

  22. $3500 for a cat... by Thunderstruck · · Score: 5, Funny

    We got a cat, it was free... we named it 1.

    We did this for two reasons. First, if it has a number, we're less attached to it when the inevitable happens. Second, my wife was allergic to cats but we weren't sure how badly.

    If we had spent $3500 on a cat, we're then somehow obligated to spend $4000 on feline coronary bypass surgery, $8000 on a feline tummy-tuck, and $3000 on feline counseling services.... Where does this end?

    --
    Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
    1. Re:$3500 for a cat... by MustardMan · · Score: 1

      My cat is named Five... seriously.

      Cat Five.

      Get it?

      I wish I came up with the joke orignally, but sadly I stole it from an internet comic. I did, however, have the lack of class to give my loving companion a name based solely on something to make other geeks chuckle.

    2. Re:$3500 for a cat... by Thunderstruck · · Score: 1

      Userfriendly.org circa 2000. Cat hat duct-tape on it's tail if I recall. Great strip, I read it every day. (Of course back then I was stringing coaxial cable for the BNC network we used...)

      --
      Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
    3. Re:$3500 for a cat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Loving companion??? I thought you were talking about you cat.

    4. Re:$3500 for a cat... by MustardMan · · Score: 1

      My cats love me... in the same way an abusive husband who beats his wife then buys her a flower loves her.

    5. Re:$3500 for a cat... by dlakelan · · Score: 1

      Pshaw, my next cat will be called "pipe to grep"

      --
      ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) http://www.endpointcomputing.com a scientific approach to custom computing.
    6. Re:$3500 for a cat... by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      Where does this end?

      It ends when there is no market for such a beast.

      There are plenty of cat-lovers with lots of money and cat allergy problems.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    7. Re:$3500 for a cat... by cmowire · · Score: 1

      I always wanted to name one conCATinate, after the string operation.

      I mean, cats love strings, although they haven't been known to put them back together. ;)

      Unfortunately, She Who Must Be Obeyed, who already puts up with an astonishingly large amount of my bad behaviour, has dictated that we can talk about the cat, but it is NOT going to have a geek pun for a name.

    8. Re:$3500 for a cat... by FFFish · · Score: 1

      I've an uncle who has had a long series of cats, all with roughly the same colouration, all named George, all of which have ultimately met their untimely end. Never a concern, there's always a new George to be found at the SPCA.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    9. Re:$3500 for a cat... by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      Personally, I would have gone the other way and used the rejected name from that same comic: "Script". as in Script Kitty.

    10. Re:$3500 for a cat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing so odd about that: Kemal Ataturk had an entire menagerie called Abdul!

    11. Re:$3500 for a cat... by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      And your wife is also named "1"? SOMEONE's in for a surprise next time she wrecks the car.

    12. Re:$3500 for a cat... by chadjg · · Score: 1

      My cat is named Five... seriously. Cat Five.

      We all know how geeks like progress and the latest thing, but it might be best not to name your next cat "6e."

      Pronounce it slow, when your tired. You thought you have class issues...

      --
      Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
    13. Re:$3500 for a cat... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      So then, does your cat also live in a bin? You know, /bin/cat ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    14. Re:$3500 for a cat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A friend of mine named his first cat 'Fish'. His second cat he named 'Meow'. He liked the fact that the Meow could say her own name.

  23. $3500 for a kitty? by Zemrec · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Damn. And I paid $65 for mine from the shelter, which included a vet check-up, all vaccines, and spaying.

    I assume this company will be neutering/spaying before they give them to their customers. Otherwise, people would just breed their own, and then sell the kittens.

    1. Re:$3500 for a kitty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irrevelant subject, IMHO. Should be:
      $3500 FOR A KITTY???!!!?!111!

      Suggested body:
      MWUAAAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

    2. Re:$3500 for a kitty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who will be the first to hack it's dna & post it on the web...damned proprietary dna formats...

  24. Dang Genetics!!! by Cracell · · Score: 1

    ok, do we really need more pets? There are freakin everywhere!!!, how about making a virus that makes them infertile or something?! seriously let's stick the genetic engineering to animals that we eat and plants (ok that won't happen) but anyways too many animals!!! someone please email me a burger, thanks

    --
    Signatures are so 90s
    1. Re:Dang Genetics!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ok, do we really need more pets? There are freakin everywhere!!!, how about making a virus that makes them infertile or something?!

      Yeah, lets do that for stupid people too.

    2. Re:Dang Genetics!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody direct this guy to a PETA meeting. I want to see the fireworks!

  25. Prior Art by Racter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Cornish Rex
    Devon Rex
    Siberian
    Sphynx

    ...are all "hypo-allergenic" breeds (don't produce dander).

    1. Re:Prior Art by Stonent1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dander is skin cells not hair.

    2. Re:Prior Art by Racter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dander is skin cells not hair.

      You may notice that, of the four breeds, three of them have fur. Further investigation is left as an exercise for the stonent.

    3. Re:Prior Art by Icculus · · Score: 1
      Admittedly not an objective source, but their site states:

      While some breeds of cats have been promoted as having less allergen than others, scientists that have tested this hypothesis have shown that all cats, regardless of breed, produce allergen. Allerca will produce the first cats that will not affect human allergies.

    4. Re:Prior Art by MustardMan · · Score: 1

      I thought most people were allergic to the dander, and not the hair.

    5. Re:Prior Art by Racter · · Score: 1

      While some breeds of cats have been promoted as having less allergen than others, scientists that have tested this hypothesis have shown that all cats, regardless of breed, produce allergen. Allerca will produce the first cats that will not affect human allergies.

      Actually, yeah. I shouldn't have said no dander...but if they won't trigger allergies at all, why not market them as nonallergenic?

    6. Re:Prior Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course the Sphynix requires a hard hat since it tends to cough up rocks.

    7. Re:Prior Art by Icculus · · Score: 1

      eh... they probably had at least 6 or 7 power lunches on the subject. My guess is that people associate the 'hypo' prefix with allergies more than 'non'. Marketing is definitely not my thing.

    8. Re:Prior Art by amalcon · · Score: 1

      If you'll notice, they also removed the allergen from the saliva glands.

      --
      -Amalcon
    9. Re:Prior Art by Aidtopia · · Score: 4, Informative
      ...are all "hypo-allergenic" breeds (don't produce dander).

      It's not all about dander. Many of us have no problem with the dander but are allergic to the saliva, which--due to their grooming habits--is all over their fur. My doc says people who don't seem to be allergic to dogs but are allergic to cats are almost certainly reacting to the allergen in the saliva rather than the dander or the fur.

    10. Re:Prior Art by catch23 · · Score: 1, Troll

      yeah like I want a cat without hair... like Dr. Evil's cat? Honestly speaking, if you tally up all the cat owners, you'll find that very few of them have naked cats. I know quite a few cat owners and none of them have naked cats.... it's just plain stupid!

    11. Re:Prior Art by joeslugg · · Score: 1

      When it comes to cat allergies, it's not just dander you have to worry about. It's the saliva too - looky.

    12. Re:Prior Art by tigerflag · · Score: 1

      In addition to your list, Siamese, Burmese, and Tonkinese (a cross between Siamese and Burmese) are often well-tolerated by people allergic to cats. I have a Tonk. I'm not allergic to cats, just wanted a Tonk. I can't testify to his hypo-allergenic qualities, but he sure is a fun cat! Plays fetch and drinks coffee.

      On a related note, biotech companies have been messing with roses for years now, putting genes from blue flowers like delphiniums and morning glories into roses to make a blue rose. The result, IMO, should not be classified or sold as a rose even though it may look like one, anymore than a mule should be called a horse.

      They take a Genus like Rosa that took over 40 million years to evolve, and risk giving it some new disease it won't have any resistance to just so idiots can get their blue Walmart special. Then let the bees spread the modified pollen around and in a few generations we might not have roses anymore. Once all roses have delphinium genes, there's no going back to the pure Genus Rosa.

    13. Re:Prior Art by jafac · · Score: 1

      . . . yeah, and they're ALL fucking ugly as hell.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    14. Re:Prior Art by stephanruby · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cats, the article said cats, not rats that look like cats.

    15. Re:Prior Art by shawb · · Score: 1

      why not market them as nonallergenic?

      Maybe because some people might be allergic to a totally different protein than they engineered out. The company then gets sued for false advertising or something...

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    16. Re:Prior Art by stefie10 · · Score: 1

      Most people are allergic to cat saliva rather than dander or fur. So although you might react less to those breeds, you will still probably react. It varies on a cat by cat and person by person basis.

    17. Re:Prior Art by MyHair · · Score: 1

      I thought dander was dried saliva from lick grooming their fur that flakes and becomes airborne. Too lazy to double-check, though.

    18. Re:Prior Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you want a cat with fur, many breeders claim that Norweigan Forest Cats (long haired, large cats that are somewhat similar in appearance to Maine Coons) are tolerated by people with cat allergies. Now if only scientists would actually investigate the claim instead of dismissing it out of hand. It's always possible a natural mutation has knocked out or changed the proteins in the saliva responsible for triggering the allergic reaction.

      Their fur also has a very different texture than most cats. It's very soft and silky... plus it doesn't tangle easily so you don't have to groom them every day like you would with a Persian to prevent it from become a walking fur matt. The only problem is it floats in the air easily, so fur gets everywhere, even spots the cat doesn't go.

    19. Re:Prior Art by Keebler71 · · Score: 1

      Just looked up the Cornish, Devon and Sphynx on wikipedia, ... it goes out of its way to say that they all are not hypoallergenic.

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    20. Re:Prior Art by kingred · · Score: 1

      Just so. And most of us who breed Siberian cats find that most people have absolutely zero allergies to them. They are long haired cats. We theorize that they don't have this allergen in their saliva, because they shed hair and other particles just like normal cats. And, unlike Sphynxes, they don't look like freaks of nature.
      Check out our website at www.vaselyok.com

    21. Re:Prior Art by cot · · Score: 1

      This is an ugly cat?

      I'm thinking seriously about getting one of these as a family member is allergic to cats.

      --

    22. Re:Prior Art by julesh · · Score: 1

      It has been said that people allergic to cat saliva tend not to have a problem with some breeds, too. Maine Coons are sometimes quoted -- I forget the others, because that's not what I was researching at the time I found it. It certainly seems to be true for at least one cat-allergic friend I have.

    23. Re:Prior Art by rarity · · Score: 1
      ...are all "hypo-allergenic" breeds (don't produce dander).

      That doesn't mean that they won't trigger an allergic reaction. I'm allergic to cats (as well as more or less anything with hair, barring humans and rodents), and was invited over to a friend's place. Said friend had a pair of cornish rexen and regaled me with tales of their non-histamine-inducing benefits, so I decided to leave the antihistamines at home. Lost a significant percentage of my body weight in tears and snot that night.

    24. Re:Prior Art by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Sort of..

      It's a protein produced by the cat, which is present in the dander, saliva, and urine as well, the highest concentration of which can be found in non-neutered males. You're right though, they all produce the protein, and it's not just in the dander.

  26. License and registration, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MEOW!!

    -"Super Troopers"

  27. I for one... by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

    welcome our new hypo-allergenic feline masters. But seriously, the future is now. This is kinda cool and creepy at the same time, since this is the stuff I've seen only in cheesy science fiction movies.

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    1. Re:I for one... by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Close but no cigar...

      I for one welcome our new genetically engineered feline overlords!

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  28. Cheaper Alternative. by Deathlizard · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Cheaper Alternative. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my friend has a sphynx and i still get an allergic reaction to it. I think its because most people are allergic to their saliva when they groom themselves.

  29. Ill wait.. by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    ...until I can get a hyper allogenic BONSAI KITTEN!

    Of course, I don't understand why you care if your cat is alergic to stuff...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  30. A bit pricey.. by tji · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the site:

    Priced at $3,500, the cost of an ALLERCA kitten is similar or less than some of the more exotic cat breeds available today.

    Ummhh.. yeah.. But, it's a bit more than the "free kittens" we all see signs for throughout our home towns.

    1. Re:A bit pricey.. by k12linux · · Score: 1

      And at that price with "normal" cats, you are allowed to breed them and "resell" the resulting kittens. Something tells me that the same won't be true for a hypo-cat.

    2. Re:A bit pricey.. by Adam9 · · Score: 1

      Are there "Free Allergy and Sinus Medicine" signs next to those?

    3. Re:A bit pricey.. by okigan · · Score: 1

      "a holding deposit of $250.00, which shall be non-refundable whether or not a Cat is ever produced or delivered. The... "

      "ever produced" they are not sure if even they can (re)produce it themselves

      Plan:
      1) Profit !

    4. Re:A bit pricey.. by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      I adopted my cats from a nearby animal rescue.* As they told us, you should never offer your kittens "free to a good home." There are plenty of people that are looking for a free kitten that won't offer a good home.

      * Take it easy on their site... one day I'll develop a better one for them.

    5. Re:A bit pricey.. by Aidtopia · · Score: 1
      But, [$3500 is] a bit more than the "free kittens" we all see....

      But it's cheaper than the co-pay for my allergy prescriptions over the lifetime of a typical house cat.

    6. Re:A bit pricey.. by technothrasher · · Score: 1
      And at that price with "normal" cats, you are allowed to breed them and "resell" the resulting kittens.


      You're allowed to, but I beg you... please don't! With the number of homeless cats in the tens of millions in the US alone (See Alley Cat Allies), that last thing we need is more kittens.

    7. Re:A bit pricey.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. Purebreds sold at that price typically come with 'neuter at first opportunity' EULAs, or are sold pre-neutered.

    8. Re:A bit pricey.. by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      How the fuck is the parent "insightful"?

      This cat is quite clearly not aimed at regular situations, but for those folks who want to own a cat, but cannot due to an allergy in the household.

      Yep. It's expensive. I bet the technology to do this is quite expensive also. If you don't want to buy one, no one is forcing you to.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    9. Re:A bit pricey.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, the point is that the Allerca site was trying to position their pricing as in line with normal cat pricing, which is a bit disingenuous. Who the hell pays $3,500 for any cat?

    10. Re:A bit pricey.. by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      But, the point is that the Allerca site was trying to position their pricing as in line with normal cat pricing

      No, quite clearly they were trying to position their pricing as being close to pricing for certain pure breeds.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    11. Re:A bit pricey.. by Deathanatos · · Score: 1

      ...bundle of joy for just $3500. 'The hypoallergenic cats produced by ALLERCA will allow consumers to enjoy the love and companionship of a pet without the cost...

      Without the cost? Oh no, $3500 is no cost at all.

    12. Re:A bit pricey.. by k12linux · · Score: 1
      If it makes you feel better, I'll let you in on a secret. The only pure-breed cat I've ever owned was a rescue and I've never owned a cat or dog that wasn't spayed or nuetered (at least by the time it was of beeding age.) I'm honestly not very fond of pure-breeds (cats or dogs) because they seem to have so many health problems.

      The point of the post though was that they are touting the price as if $3500 was comperable to what someone might be willing to pay for an exotic cat. I am willing to bet that almost nobody pays $3500 for a cat without some intent to breed it... except perhaps the idle rich.

    13. Re:A bit pricey.. by technothrasher · · Score: 1
      If it makes you feel better, I'll let you in on a secret. The only pure-breed cat I've ever owned was a rescue and I've never owned a cat or dog that wasn't spayed or nuetered (at least by the time it was of beeding age.) I'm honestly not very fond of pure-breeds (cats or dogs) because they seem to have so many health problems.


      I hope you didn't think I was attacking you personally! I'm not even one of those crazies who thinks all pure-bred breeders are inherently evil. I was really just taking the opportunity to hopefully point out the homeless cat problem to any slashdot readers who love cats but maybe didn't realize the issue was so critical, and that casually allowing cats to breed is maybe not the best idea.

  31. hypo or non allergenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if "hypo-allergenic" means "non-allergenic" in this context. If someone suffers from cat allergies, a "hypo-allergenic" cat may not be enough, giving them a false sense of security until AFTER they plop down the $3500. If it was a non-allergenic cat, then we can party.

  32. Im sick of... by TEMM · · Score: 5, Funny

    corporations genetically engineering my favorite foods.

    1. Re:Im sick of... by Loualbano2 · · Score: 1

      O.K. ALF

    2. Re:Im sick of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go back to melmac, you freak!

      Oh God, did I just remember that? Oh crap, flashbacks!!! Quick, fire up another episode of Punky Brewster!

    3. Re:Im sick of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      $3500 dollar kittens give Morbo gas!!!! Puny humans.

  33. Sea bass? by jwigum · · Score: 1

    with frickin' laser beams?

    --

    Look behind you...

  34. What next? by GillBates0 · · Score: 1
    Domestic pets who refrain from licking their balls in public?

    I shure hope so.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:What next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Envy is such an ugly thing.

    2. Re:What next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not yet, but we nearly have a GE /. Troll that does not lick its balls in public.

      It does still keep its head well up its arse.

  35. Glycoprotein by killermookie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So they're reducing the amount this gene is about to produce this protein. Is there a reason why cats produce this protein and by reducing it cause any health issues with the cat?

    1. Re:Glycoprotein by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1

      From what I have read, cats are "secreters", which means some of their blood antigens are not only produced on the blood cells, but also produced by the salivary glands and excreted in their saliva. Saliva can be a potent allergen. Now that the gene is identified, they can make a "knock-out" cat that doesn't have the secreter gene.

      Humans have a similar gene and those that are not "secreters" are just as healthy as those that are.

    2. Re:Glycoprotein by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      It probably prevents them from getting some horrible disease from licking their butts. I expect we'll find out in about 5 years.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  36. So torn... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

    I like both cats and dogs but am allergic to the former. So while a cat that doesn't give me an asthma attack would be pretty cool, I find GE stuff to be distasteful at best. I'm sure this is self contradictory somewheres, but I don't think fiddling with an animals genome is a good idea. Hence my dilemma. Guess I'll stick with Option C then, and just enjoy the rottie;-)

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:So torn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Guess I'll stick with Option C then, and just enjoy the rottie;-)"... ...whose genome has been altered from its 'natural' state by at least 2 orders of magnitude more.

  37. Wonderful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So go back there. Here's a link.
    Bye.

  38. does it come with an MP3 player? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    For $3500, kitty better have at least 20GB of storage in her butt.

    1. Re:does it come with an MP3 player? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually it comes with an embedded microchip, maybe it has an mp3 player (see the licence details!)

    2. Re:does it come with an MP3 player? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Honey, the cat core dumped in my hat!

    3. Re:does it come with an MP3 player? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the data retrieval system is manual.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    4. Re:does it come with an MP3 player? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Are you sure that you want all your music to sound like it came from a cat's bum?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:does it come with an MP3 player? by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      At least its not removable flash.

      But then again, "hard drive" doesn't sound much better.

      --
      I don't get it.
    6. Re:does it come with an MP3 player? by syousef · · Score: 1

      For $3500, kitty better have at least 20GB of storage in her butt.

      If the quality of music you normally listen to sounds like it came out of a cat's butt, you need a change in music.

      Don't worry about the 20GB storage. No pet owner has ever come to the end of their time with a pet and thought "man I'm going to miss what came out of the little critter's butt, if only there was more".

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    7. Re:does it come with an MP3 player? by relaxmax · · Score: 1
      20GB of storage in her butt

      ...so I can plug my headphones right into her ass and have on-demand music!

      Increase volume - twist neck clockwise

      Decrease volume - twist neck counter-clockwise

      Skip song - Stroke the neck until you get to desired song

      Pause / Play - press on nose

      -- rxMx --

      --
      Love all, Trust few, Follow one.
  39. Hmm, this was done years ago. by EoRaptor · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Breeders already have cats that are missing the allergen causing protein from their saliva.

    Bengal Cats and Siberian-Russians are two such breeds, and several unofficial subbreeds also fit the bill.

    Google if you want breed info, but Bengals are a short haired, very outgoing breed with great social skills and tons of energy. The also play fetch and are suprisingly clever. Siberian-Russians are a long haired breed who behave more like traditional cats, in that they can be fat and lazy all the way through to hyper.

    1. Re:Hmm, this was done years ago. by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      And are loud. We have a cat that we think is part bengal and he yowls whenever he's not sure where we are. You can hear him through two closed doors across the house.

    2. Re:Hmm, this was done years ago. by m0llusk · · Score: 1

      This is not true, as people with high sensitivity to these allergens can easily demonstrate. The Allergy, Asthma, and Immuninology Associates page on cat allergies sums this up well:

      Although individual cats may produce more or less allergen, there is no relationship between the pet's hair length and allergen production, and no such thing as a non-allergenic breed.

      Being loose with qualifications is common, but those who have had the experience of extreme difficulty breathing because of exposure to cat allergens are motivated to be more precise.

  40. Finally by chaffed · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty optimistic about the future. I think I may find out, in my lifetime, if androids dream of electric sheep!

    I do have a really bad joke on the mind that involves a New Zealander and electric sheep. However I won't share so that I can spare some peoples feelings...

    --
    What could possibly go wrong?
    1. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Change it from New Zealander to Australian and share away!

      Just to encourage you, I'll share one about the Brits:

      Q:Why do Scotsmen wear kilts?

      A:Because sheep can hear a zipper a mile away.

      Q:Why do Englishmen wear pants?

      A:Because goats can't.

  41. How do they control their market? by tji · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, are there other genetic changes they make to the cats? For example, making them infertile?

    Otherwise, how do they prevent people from buying a few of them, breeding them, and undercutting their market?

    I am allergic to cats, so I've never really considered getting one before. But, if these come down to the couple hundred dollar range, I might be interested. But, at $3,500/each, I think I'll instead go for that dual 2.5GHz G5 Mac.

    1. Re:How do they control their market? by Zemrec · · Score: 1

      Neutering. Duh.

      Obviously not a pet owner. Cats are prolific breeders, and there's a lot more cats in this country than people to care for them. Hence humane societies catch and neuter them so the population can be controlled.

    2. Re:How do they control their market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that was the OP's point. Cat's are prolific breeders, so once they begin selling these things, won't they pretty much flood the market on their own.

      Most vets don't neuter a kitten before it's 4-6 months old. So, that creates a bit of a production problem for the company. Unless they are genetically modified to be infertile.

    3. Re:How do they control their market? by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Which leads me to the question: is this dominant or recessive, gene-wise? Then you could maybe even do it with only one of the two cats being geneticaly modified :)

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  42. How about a Ferret? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean really. Those things are cute as hell, but damn do they smell. Engineer away those musk glands, and I'd buy one up in a jiffy.

    1. Re:How about a Ferret? by The+Meeper · · Score: 1

      You can get the anal scent glands removed surgically if you ask a vet.

      --
      -Meeper
  43. Schnorkie or Yowzer by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Here is a short summary of the man page for my dog.

    I have a Yorkie-Mini Schnauzer cross, and she has the following features:

    1) Incredibly cute. Daisy's Picture

    2) Does not pee on the carpet. I strongly reccomend this book, an absolute must for humanely and effectively training your dog.

    3) She triggers no cat allergies whatsoever.

    4) She did not cost $3500.

    5) She, like other dogs, after adequate programming (RTFM in point #2 above ;) performs well according to input givem from the user. Like any canine, with bad programming or inadequate data, she will not behave correctly. A canine that bluescreens is not a good dog.

    6) She is not a cat.

    In all seriousness though, get that book and train your dog. Yorkies or any other dog will not pee on your carpet if you train them appropriately. Note, some dogs may have medical reasons that cause inadvertant leakage, you may need to check with your vet about this.

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    1. Re:Schnorkie or Yowzer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incredibly cute

      Reminds me of Saddam Hussein, actually.

    2. Re:Schnorkie or Yowzer by spinlocked · · Score: 1

      Incredibly cute

      Cuteness is in the eye of the beholder. That creature looks as ugly as sin to me.

      Mind you, I hate dogs.

      --
      # init 5
      Connection closed.


      Oh... ...bugger.
  44. Not the only way to get a hypo-allergenic cat by jparker · · Score: 2, Informative

    In case you're a cat lover with allergies (like me) and not entirely fond of genetic engineering (also like me), there are a few breeds of cats that are naturally hypo-allergenic. We had a devon rex (http://www.cfainc.org/breeds/profiles/devon.html) that never gave me any allergy problems. They look a little odd until you get used to them, but now all other cats just look strange to me. I believe there are other breeds as well (the cornish rex, for one) that play nice with your allergies.
    And the $3500 price tag on one of these makes the $600 I spent look a lot more reasonable.

  45. Also good for... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...dogs with dietary allergies.

    Seriously, if you are that hard up for companionship, $3500 will pay for some nice hookers.

    1. Re:Also good for... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if you want them to pee on your carpet, it's gonna cost extra. The pets will do it for free.

    2. Re:Also good for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm allergic to hookers, you insensitive clod!!!

    3. Re:Also good for... by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you might have some severe reactions to the things hookers might be carrying...

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
  46. GM Food, by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    So in China will these cats be banned as GM Food?

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
  47. Vapor...genetics? by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Clients will take delivery of the first ALLERCA kittens in 2007. The hypoallergenic cat is the first of a planned series of lifestyle pets that ALLERCA will develop over the next few years."

    Notice the "will develop". Notice the 2007 date. Notice the high price tag. Genetic engineering is not like building a car. It's unpredictable. At this point, their 'research' is vaporware at best.

    "A glycoprotein, Fel d 1, secreted by the sebaceous glands, is the major cat allergen. This allergen is found in the fur, pelt, saliva, serum, urine, mucous, salivary glands, and hair roots of the cat.

    Using patented genetic technology, the ALLERCA team will focus on the particular gene that produces the Fel d 1 glycoprotein. Using a technique known as "gene silencing", the process reduces the gene's ability to produce the protein."

    Will silencing this protein have undesirable effects? Nobody knows. And it's only the 'major' allergen, not the only one.

    I wouldn't be betting 3500$ on this at the moment. Altought its a cute idea. Cats as guinea pigs for genetic engineering anyone?

  48. Re:What next by spectecjr · · Score: 1

    When they can genetically engineer a cat to fetch and respond to it's name then sign me up!!

    I've got one that responds to its name, and can learn how to do simple tasks (such as open doors and window sashes once it sees how the humans do it). No genetic engineering required.

    Cats are, however, too intelligent to play fetch.

    --
    Coming soon - pyrogyra
  49. House training by ryane67 · · Score: 2, Informative

    house training huh... my wife and I have 2 cats.. first thing ya do is drop them in the litter box when you bring them home, scratch their paws in it.. and you're done. they are trained for life. havent had an accident.. ever.

    --
    ?SYNTAX ERROR IN LINE 42
    1. Re:House training by Unordained · · Score: 2, Funny

      Indeed. The only accident we ever had was when we tried to re-train our cat to use the human toilet instead of a litter box. He refused. He wound up peeing on things that were his (bed, chair, whatever we never used anyway) and pooped once right in front of the bathroom where his litter box had been up until recently. He won, he got his litter box back, not had a problem since. Our cat and his sister were found on the doorstep of the local vet's office, way too young to be weaned. He's been a little weird emotionally, but potty-training is *not* an issue with cats, even when they've not had a mother caring for them. Now, a genetically-engineered cat who won't steal your post-its of your desk in the middle of the night, that'd be nice. And one who won't wake you up before your alarm clock goes off. And one who doesn't greet you in the morning by biting your foot. And ...

    2. Re:House training by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      I'd just be happy if he didn't leap on my full bladder first thing in the morning. You'd swear by the look he was giving me afterwards, I was the one who should have apologized for ruining HIS moment of relaxation.

      Bastard cat *shakes his fist angrily*

    3. Re:House training by mikechant · · Score: 1

      To a cat, a full bladder or stomach is like a comfy water-bed.

  50. Where's my calendar? by Rich+Klein · · Score: 1

    Surely it's not April 1st already?

    --
    -Rich
  51. Promising News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Maybe they will be able to genetically engineer a woman who won't be repulsed by my face

  52. OT but.... by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

    How the hell did the term "pussy" arise in the American language?

    I really don't get it, did cats used to have something to do with.. you know?

    Like what? They used cats during sex or something?

    1. Re:OT but.... by over_exposed · · Score: 1

      -They're usually fuzzy
      -Sometimes cute
      -Almost always picky
      -Smell horrible sometimes
      -Think they own the place
      -Good ones can be very expensive
      -Cheap ones are almost always nasty
      -Can cause "purr" if you pet it right

      Make sense now?

      --
      "The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
    2. Re:OT but.... by fembots · · Score: 1

      Like what? They used cats during sex or something?

      Truly a slashdot nerd question. Pussy comes before, you know, pussy. So they must have used (maybe sacrified) women when worshipping cats.

    3. Re:OT but.... by lav-chan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The origins of the term in the vulgar sense are disputed, although Webster's Third International Dictionary traces the root to the Old Norse puss, cognate with "purse" and also cites the Low Germanic puse meaning "vulva" and the Scandinavian puss with the same meaning.

      According to the Oxford English Dictionary, puss was used as a "call-name" for cats in both German and English, but pussy was used in English more as a synonym for "cat". In addition to cats, the word was also used for rabbits and hares as well as a humorous name for tigers. In the 19th century, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, the meaning was extended "in childish speech, applied to anything soft and furry", as in pussy willow. In thieves' slang, it meant "fur coat".

      Prior to this in the 16th century it was used to refer to women in general and it continues to be applied to old women.

      The double entendre has been used for over a hundred years by performers, including the late 19th-century vaudeville act, the Barrison Sisters, who performed the notorious routine "Do You Want To See My Pussy?" (see entry for more), the Funkadelic song "Pussy", as well as a character (Pussy Galore) and a title (Octopussy) in the James Bond series.


      From Wikipedia. :/

    4. Re:OT but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed "Contains sharp teeth."

      But that may be because you aren't from where I am from.

    5. Re:OT but.... by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 1

      I'm not quite sure about other Scandinavian countries, but current Norwegian has no word "puss", vulgar or no. We do have the quite common slang "mus", referring to female genitalia, which is literally the word which in English is "mouse".

      ... which tends to make it awkward for females with pet mice to talk about their pet, and more recently for any female with a computer to talk about her pointing device.

      --
      -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
    6. Re:OT but.... by stud9920 · · Score: 0

      In french, female genitals are also known as "la chatte".

    7. Re:OT but.... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I think Mrs. Slocumb started it on "Are You Being Served?"

    8. Re:OT but.... by K3lvin · · Score: 1

      In Finnish there's "pussi" meaning a bag. I've always thought it's a loan word from Swedish.

    9. Re:OT but.... by Catroaster · · Score: 1

      Slocombe, old boy.

    10. Re:OT but.... by mikechant · · Score: 1

      The double entendre has been used for over a hundred years by performers, including the late 19th-century vaudeville act, the Barrison Sisters, who performed the notorious routine "Do You Want To See My Pussy?" (see entry for more), the Funkadelic song "Pussy", as well as a character (Pussy Galore) and a title (Octopussy) in the James Bond series.

      And us oldies in the UK will never forget the interminable series of jokes about Mrs. Slocombe's 'pussy' in the crap British sitcom 'Are you being served'...

      E.g. "Oh no, I can't come out tonight, I'm washing my pussy."

    11. Re:OT but.... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      And don't the Germhuns use "Katze" too? I suppose it's possible they both translated the English (actually, I think it's American) expression but i thinkit's unlikely, FWIW.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  53. Or a cheaper alternative.... by Savet+Hegar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just build up a tollerance to the cat.

    Since I was young, I've been extremely alergic to anything with fur. Guinnea pigs, gerbils, dogs, cats, you name it.

    I had to get rid of a Guinnea pig because I broke out in hives.

    I got a dog when I was about 13, and even though it killed my alergies for a while, I got used to it. Now I have 3 dogs and a cat, and none bother my alergies.

    Alergies are an extreme response from the body to a foreign substance. By building up a tolerance, the body reacts less extremely.

    --
    Mod points are pointless when you browse at -1.
    1. Re:Or a cheaper alternative.... by VoidWraith · · Score: 1

      For some allergies, and some people, its completely the opposite. Food allergies and bee stings especially. However with animals its not a very risky choice to try and build up an immunity, though I wouldn't put any bets on it working.

    2. Re:Or a cheaper alternative.... by asuffield · · Score: 1
      Alergies are an extreme response from the body to a foreign substance. By building up a tolerance, the body reacts less extremely.


      No, quite the opposite. Allergies are an immune-system response; they are the tolerance built up over time. You cannot be allergic to a substance which you have never encountered - your body is responding exactly as if it were repulsing an infection. As such the symptoms will grow stronger with more exposure, as your immune system learns how to react faster (rapidly reaching a plateau).


      If there is something to which you build up a tolerance and this reduces the irritation, you aren't allergic to that thing. Any symptoms it appears to cause are not an allergic reaction, they're something else.

  54. But not allergen-free by Autumnmist · · Score: 4, Informative

    From their site:
    A glycoprotein, Fel d 1, secreted by the sebaceous glands, is the major cat allergen. This allergen is found in the fur, pelt, saliva, serum, urine, mucous, salivary glands, and hair roots of the cat.

    Allerca cats will only lack one of the potential cat allergens... potentially deadly for people allergic to other proteins secreted by the cats. In addition, the gene silencing technique (I assume they refer to RNAi perhaps using siRNAs) cannot be guaranteed 100% effective--all it takes is one mutation.... More info about RNAi here and here.

    However, as someone with moderately severe cat allergies, this is definitely a start.

    --
    --- "Many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view." ~ Ben Kenobi, 'Return of the Jedi'
    1. Re:But not allergen-free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Allerca cats will only lack one of the potential cat allergens... potentially deadly for people allergic to other proteins secreted by the cats.

      Deadly? Who has cat allergies severe enough to cause anaphylaxis? In my experience and from what I've read, cat allergies can make people miserable, but...kill them? really?

    2. Re:But not allergen-free by Autumnmist · · Score: 1

      Any allergy can be severe enough to cause anaphylactic shock... it's only a matter of how serious a reaction your immune system generates.

      --
      --- "Many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view." ~ Ben Kenobi, 'Return of the Jedi'
  55. Glow-in-the-Dark Hypoallergenic Cat to Follow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, when will this cat be "mated" with Alba, the glow-in-the-dark bunny rabbit?

  56. Good... by dickeya · · Score: 0

    now my dog won't sneeze when carrying our cat around by the head.

  57. Cat DRM by Foktip · · Score: 0

    okay - like most other companies these days, they WILL definitely want some sort of copy protection.

    so your cat cant be mixed with other cat formats! :P

    1. Re:Cat DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in the licencing agreement it is written that they have the right to implant a microchip.

  58. Re:Pre-orders of these new cats are outselling PS2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bzzzt .... I'm sorry, but Aibo was the correct subject line reference.

  59. Underwear Gnomes look out! by Mr.+Cancelled · · Score: 1
    Does anyone know if these things are sterile?

    Here's what I'm thinkin':
    1. Buy 2 hypo-allergenic cats for a total of $7000.00
    2. Let them screw like bunnys
    3. Sell my own hypo-allergenic kitties for $2500.00 apiece
    4. After the 3rd sale, I'm in profit city baby!
    Underwear Gnomes, eat yer' heart out.

    Now there is, of course, the initial investment of $7000.00 (he says while scanning the crowd). So who'd like to be among the first to invest in "Kittys4Less".
    1. Re:Underwear Gnomes look out! by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      So who'd like to be among the first to invest in "Kittys4Less".

      Nah, it'll never work. Now, if you had been trying to get money for kittys4less.com...

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    2. Re:Underwear Gnomes look out! by JazzHarper · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know if these things are sterile?

      They will probably be sterilized (spayed/neutered) before they are sold. That is becoming standard practice among breeders of pedigreed cats.
      -

  60. How about... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1, Insightful
    ... breeding some fuckin *non-allergic* people? Why is it that every third person you meet these days is allergic to something?


    Please, for the good of humanity, let evolution take its course and remove these people from the gene pool!

    1. Re:How about... by vsprintf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Please, for the good of humanity, let evolution take its course and remove these people from the gene pool!

      Allergies often arise after years of repeated exposure to something. Be careful what you wish for.

    2. Re:How about... by gaijin99 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Allergies have a direct relationship with the level of pollutants in the area the person grew up in. As, not coincidentally, do cancer rates.

      Note that all the research, work, effort, and awareness programs directed at both cancer and allergies focus on drugs to control the conditions rather than prevention of the condition. The reason for this becomes apparent when you note that the majority of the funding for the cancer and allergy research comes from polluters.

      The obvious step would be to reduce pollution, but somehow that doesn't get mentioned in any cancer or allergy literature. I wonder why...

      --
      "Mission Accomplished" -- George W. Bush May 1, 2003
    3. Re:How about... by tmalone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember something from a class I took about some researchers who found an initial link to allergies and cancer. Something about fewer allergies, or supressed allergies leading to higher cancer rates. I don't remember the exact nature of the study, but it was interesting. The theory being that an allergy is your bodies way of saying "this is some fucked up stuff that is getting into me". By supressing that, you are allowing toxins to run rampant through your body. The same line of thinking leads to the conclusion that people without allergies have improperly functioning immune systems. The research was in the very early phase, but sounded very intriguing.

    4. Re:How about... by yoha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is an interesting point you raise, but I don't think you can back it up with evidence. Currently the majority of research is done by the government, major hospitals, and major pharmaceutical firms. The funding for these organizations comes from taxpayers, taxpayers/patients/investors, and investors, respectively. Could you name an organization that is doing cancer research, which is funded (largely or even slightly) by a polluter?

    5. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the correlation between pollution and allergies is reversed. Children growing up in polluted areas get less allergies than children in "clean" environments.

      I only have swedish references to back hat statement, but it is a fact that swedish children have higher risk of getting allergies than children in former east block urban areas.

    6. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      'Fraid not. Comparing the amount of the population in a city with relatively low pollution like, say, Stockholm (Sweden), with a relatively dirty one, say, Krakow (Poland), you'd expect the number of allergies to be far higher in the more polluted city. This turns out not true. Allergies are much more common in the modern "Western world" than in, for instance, the old "East block". And this even though there is a much higher percentage of coal used in heating homes, industry pollution levels are higher, and cars are generally older and typically generate worse exhaust. Just stating pollution as a factor doesn't make sense.

      What is reasonably clear from a research perspective, however, is that growing up in a spotlessly clean environment makes you MORE susceptible to allergies. It seems better to be subjected to (a reasonable amount of) "filth" than to none at all. Unless, of course, you DO develop an allergy - in which case spotlessness is more or less your only option.

      What I would personally like to see, is more research focused on this simple fact - what factors are different between the "richer" and the "poorer" societies - is it the chemicals we use to clean our homes? Or could there be some correlation with the kind of food we tend to consume?

      I just think there's a lot we don't know here...

    7. Re:How about... by bheer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      'Fraid not. Comparing the amount of the population in a city with relatively low pollution like, say, Stockholm (Sweden), with a relatively dirty one, say, Krakow (Poland), you'd expect the number of allergies to be far higher in the more polluted city. This turns out not true. Allergies are much more common in the modern "Western world" than in, for instance, the old "East block".

      Good point. Another interesting datapoint is the much lower rate of allergies in crowded, dirty Asian cities (these cities have decent healthcare, so it's not like allergies are underreported). Also, Asians (at least South Asians) seem to have much lower rates of nut allergies, hayfever allergies, etc.

      I just think there's a lot we don't know here...

      I'd love to see some research on the correlation between 'cleaner societies' and immune systems development.

    8. Re:How about... by mpe · · Score: 1

      Allergies have a direct relationship with the level of pollutants in the area the person grew up in. As, not coincidentally, do cancer rates.
      Note that all the research, work, effort, and awareness programs directed at both cancer and allergies focus on drugs to control the conditions rather than prevention of the condition. The reason for this becomes apparent when you note that the majority of the funding for the cancer and allergy research comes from polluters.


      Things are a little more complex in that whilst some pollutants can cause allergies it's also possible for ultra-"clean" environments to result in people being prone to allergies. (As well as breeding "superbugs".)
      The human immune system needs a level of environmental training in order to function correctly. Disabling part of a cat's immune system because humans have developed environments which encourage faulty human immune systems does not strike me as a good approach. There's also the problem that this company hasn't been in business long enough to know that their actions are harmless to cats.

    9. Re:How about... by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      "The same line of thinking leads to the conclusion that people without allergies have improperly functioning immune systems."

      Which would explain how I, with no allergies, have been sick very few days in my life and get over flues more rapidly than most, right?

    10. Re:How about... by CreatureComfort · · Score: 4, Interesting


      I once read a study (my bookmarked link seems to be dead) that reviewed most of the studies on cancer preventative diets. You know the fish oil/olive oil/red wine/etc. reports. The researchers pointed out that all of the reasons each of these foods had been studied was because they were primary dietary components of groups of people with low cancer rates, compared to American society. When they started correlating factors the big commonality they found was that most of these societies used an extremely low amount of preservatives in their diet, with almost no artificial preservatives consumed at all. Through the data gathered by the other studies, and logical explanation of how preservatives work and the effect they probably have when induced into a living organism, they were able to convincingly postulate that what may be driving the high incidents of cancer in the western world, particularly the U.S., could be the massive amounts of preservatives the typical "modern world" person consumes over their lifetime.

      At the time this was published there was quite a bit of talk about it on some of the research biology mailing lists. One of the students working for the main researchers posted some comments that the grant request to study the possible harmful effects of artificial preservatives had been turned down by their university. One of the reasons given was that the ability to preserve food for long periods was essential to modern food distribution methods, and if preservatives ended up having to be banned or heavily regulated as cancer causing agents it could mean mass starvation and worse health problems from food spoilage. To date I still have not seen any large scale or in depth studies on the cancer causing potential of artificial preservatives when taken in large quantities over a period of years.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    11. Re:How about... by lintocs · · Score: 1

      Allergies are much more common in the modern "Western world" than in, for instance, the old "East block". And this even though there is a much higher percentage of coal used in heating homes... What I would personally like to see, is more research focused on this...

      Sure, we could do more research, or we could just look quickly at the inferences and jump to a rash decision that would have a positive economic impact. The way I interpret your data, burning huge amount of coal should eliminate allergies! Imagine it, coal burning cars, coal heating our homes, 100% power generation from coal. Recent surveys say North America has enough coal to last 100 years... let the good times roll!!! (cough, cough).

      S

    12. Re:How about... by tmalone · · Score: 1

      the study was how it relates to cancer, not how it relates to viruses. the theory being that cancer comes from too many toxins in your body (like from cigarettes). If your body isn't rejecting them (causing you to sneeze and such), then they are still in there, which is probably a bad thing.

    13. Re:How about... by Suidae · · Score: 1

      One of the reasons given was that the ability to preserve food for long periods was essential to modern food distribution methods, and if preservatives ended up having to be banned or heavily regulated as cancer causing agents it could mean mass starvation and worse health problems from food spoilage.

      I dunno, it seems like they'd still want to know, even if not much could be done about it in the short term. Its not like people are going to immediately stop eating food with preservatives because it will give them a slightly higher risk of cancer decades from now. They'd just start preferentially buying food without preservatives when it was available. With that market pressure suppliers would have economic incentive to make more of those kinds of goods available.

      That of course presumes that people will take the healthy choice rather than the cheap one, which, for most of the population is probably false. In which case it is the governments responsability to come up with a scheme to phase out those things that cause problems in such a way that minimal economic damage is done.

      it occurs to me that there are alot of things like this that a purely capitalistic society would never change. I'll bet living in an anarchy would suck balls.

    14. Re:How about... by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1


      Yeah. I also have no information on who sponsors this kind of research in the first place. If perhaps it were a major chemical company, who manufacturers artificial preservatives.... pure speculation, but then I'm a continually disappointed optimist.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
  61. They Don't EXIST, folks! by fanatic · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Clients will take delivery of the first ALLERCA kittens in 2007.

    From the first hit on Google searching for cat gestation:

    "Cats generally have pregnancies lasting from 58 to 65 days".

    So the fact that the first one won't "ship" until 2007 is a bad sign. Anybody sending these folks money now, *please* contact me for a great deal on a bridge.

    --
    "that's not encryption - it's a new perl script that I'm working on..." - from some Matrix parody
    1. Re:They Don't EXIST, folks! by FryGuy1013 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe they are breeding a bunch of them so that they can sell a lot of them on their initial offering. Maybe they are testing them to make sure they don't come up with hyper-allergens later in life. There are plenty of reasons they may delay "shipping" these cats other than the fact that they don't have them.

      --
      bananas like monkeys.
    2. Re:They Don't EXIST, folks! by _Swank · · Score: 3, Informative

      if you look at the crap you have to agree to it says that the $250.00 deposit is non-refundable whether or not they ever produce or deliver a cat. with that kind of agreement i wouldn't reserve one until i saw one with my own eyes.

    3. Re:They Don't EXIST, folks! by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      I recently bought a pedigree kitten from a breeder, the breed has only recently been recognised for showing (Australian Mist - Category 3 for showing in Australia), we bought this particular breed because of it's temperment (the primary reason this particular breed was brought into being).

      To get the breed to a state where they can reliably breed healthy animals that consistently exhibit the same pelt, markings, body shape/size, traits has taken the breeder nearly 15 years and many generations. One of the big problems with pure-breds is that the inbreeding often leads to problems with the animals health (Mists had problems with liver disease in many of the earlier generations, only living to an average age of about 5 years).

      To determine what sort of problems you will get with a breed of animal takes time and multiple generations. It's not like DVD media where you can do accellerated tests to estimate the life exceptancy.

      If anything, 2007 sounds a bit optimistic.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    4. Re:They Don't EXIST, folks! by djward · · Score: 1

      They're still busy breeding the Longhorn Cat. They excluded some cool features (no poop, always friendly, avoids the computer when it pees) to make the 2007 release date, but the hypo-allergenic stuff should be in there.

    5. Re:They Don't EXIST, folks! by crash24601 · · Score: 1
      if you look at the crap you have to agree to it says that the $250.00 deposit is non-refundable whether or not they ever produce or deliver a cat. with that kind of agreement i wouldn't reserve one until i saw one with my own eyes.

      I highly recommend reading the agreement on their website, one of the best reads I've had in years. Some other great tidbits from the agreement.

      If you die or go crazy before the cat is available, your relatives can buy the cat.

      The $3500 will be adjusted for inflation when they actually come up for sale.

      50% of the cats produced go to the open market, instead of to people who have deposits down.

      You cannot sell or transfer the cat except to immediate family.

      You cannot sell or give away any genetic material from the cat.

      They can spay, neuter and microchip your cat if they so choose.

      You agree to take an allergy test and turn the results over to the company if they so choose.

    6. Re:They Don't EXIST, folks! by syousef · · Score: 1

      IANAL but...

      I wonder how much of that would stand up legally. For example forcing you to take an allergy test might be quite a hard one to enforce. To make it financially worthwhile might require a bigger market than they're likely to have.

      No on-sale may or may not be legal in different jurisdicitons.

      I believe though that usually the rules which aren't legal are the only ones stricken off a legal agreement if it goes to court though. So that sounds more like cat rental to ownership than me.

      Legal stupidity abounds.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  62. Obligatory Simpsons Quote by MagicDude · · Score: 4, Funny

    Homer - "I know, I'll breed the pets together. Soon, I will have a miracle hybrid with the loyalty of a cat and the cleanliness of a dog."

  63. $3500 for a hunting trip... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I might be willing to pay $3500 to hunt genetically mutated cats with Ted Nugent.

  64. De-allegizing existing cats? by runderwo · · Score: 1

    What's the best way to take care of existing cat dander on furniture/carpet, and to make a normal allergen-producing cat less offensive to someone who is allergic? I've seen various methods touted by manufacturers of cure-alls, but no independent studies on what methods actually work.

    1. Re:De-allegizing existing cats? by dargaud · · Score: 1
      I've heard that washing your cat daily with mild soap and warm water removes most of the allergens from the fur (it does nothing to the saliva though). Supposedly if you start with a young cat you can train it to like the shower, although that sounds like a sure way to end up with facial reconstructive surgery if you try it with an older cat...

      PS: I'm an allergic cat lover too.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  65. $3500... by MacFury · · Score: 1

    It's such a shame considering there will be people buying these cats. Just think of all the better uses for $3500. I wish people would get as much enjoyment out of helping their fellow man as they do out of taking care of some crap factory.

  66. microchip implant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    in the licencing agreement, it is allowed that the Cat be implanted with a microchip. also the Cat may be spayed/neutered before delivery.

  67. welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new hypo-allergenic overlords.

  68. Re:What next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I've had two cats that both come when they're called and fetch. You just have to find something that they want to play with.

    rus

  69. Screw hypoallergenic... by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 5, Funny

    Totally useless.

    How about a cat that doesn't shed, a cat that sleeps AT NIGHT instead of during the day, a cat that doesn't s**t behind the couch when you piss it off, a cat that is hairball resistant, a cat that doesn't care if the bowl isn't exactly full, a cat that can actually decide if it wants to be inside or outside (as opposed to wanting both simultaneously), a cat that views keyboards as natural preditors, a cat that will not release any "presents" in the house until said "gift" is completely DEAD, a cat that will actually kill said "gifts" that get into your house by other means, a cat that'll bring home USEFUL things instead of the typical birds, rabbits, mice, frogs... a new lawnmower would be nice once in awhile, or maybe some PC hardware - but no, it's always half-dead stuff.

    THAT would be a cat worth a couple grand.

    --

    help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    1. Re:Screw hypoallergenic... by smharr4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know that your cat is bringing you gifts that are alive because he/she is giving you the chance to kill it, right?

      As was explained to me, cats don't see you as human, they see you as other cats. By bringing you a live gift, they're showing that they care enough about you to give you the privilege of letting you kill it, rather than giving you a dead-for-god-only-knows-how-long gift.

      Having said that, being outside for a cat is quite dangerous, if you keep your cats indoors then the'll probably live longer, cost less at the vets and never bring you 'gifts' again.

    2. Re:Screw hypoallergenic... by arose · · Score: 1

      Unless you have mice, than you will get gifts for the first few months.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    3. Re:Screw hypoallergenic... by Scarabaeus · · Score: 1

      Your cat will sleep at night if you keep it up during the day. Play with the little bugger. Well, get a good cat book, that will tell you about that and the other things.

    4. Re:Screw hypoallergenic... by darrylo · · Score: 3, Funny
      ... a cat that can actually decide if it wants to be inside or outside (as opposed to wanting both simultaneously) ...

      How do you think the Heisenberg Uncertainty Priciple was developed???

    5. Re:Screw hypoallergenic... by Selanit · · Score: 1
      How about a cat that doesn't shed, a cat that sleeps AT NIGHT instead of during the day, a cat that doesn't s**t behind the couch when you piss it off, a cat that is hairball resistant, a cat that doesn't care if the bowl isn't exactly full, a cat that can actually decide if it wants to be inside or outside (as opposed to wanting both simultaneously), a cat that views keyboards as natural preditors, a cat that will not release any "presents" in the house until said "gift" is completely DEAD, a cat that will actually kill said "gifts" that get into your house by other means, a cat that'll bring home USEFUL things instead of the typical birds, rabbits, mice, frogs... a new lawnmower would be nice once in awhile, or maybe some PC hardware - but no, it's always half-dead stuff.

      Some of this wishlist can be met by judicious selection, equipping and training. MY cat 1) is hairball resistant (she's gotten like one or two in the last eighteen years); 2) doesn't urinate/defecate indoors (she takes care of all that outdoors); 3) is always exactly where she wants to be (a cat flap is a beautiful invention); and 4) she doesn't walk on keyboards any more (check PawSense out!).

      I'll admit she does have an unfortunate habit of bringing half-dead critters in -- but fortunately, she has a very distinctive yowl meaning "I've just crippled something and I've just gotta show you," which makes it easy to shove her out the cat flap and latch it behind her before she actually lets her new playmate loose.

      As for bringing in useful stuff, well . . . if I had a cat with discerning taste in computer hardware who was also strong enough to haul in a lawnmower, I would be rather nervous about living in the same house with it. ;-)

    6. Re:Screw hypoallergenic... by back_pages · · Score: 3, Interesting
      My cat fits your ideal cat except for bringing you useful gifts - mine never brings anything.

      I treated him like a dog right from the beginning and that's how he acts. He'll even follow me around the neighborhood if he isn't stalking something. He doesn't jerk me around because he knows I'll win - if he gets picky about his food, it'll look a lot tastier tomorrow. If he can't decide whether or not to come in, it's easier to decide 4 hours from now. If I piss him off, he wakes me up at 5am rather than make a mess, because he ends up wearing the mess and if he doesn't clean himself up, he takes a shower with shampoo.

      I really don't understand why people baby their cats. I'm far from an expert on pets but I think a lot of a cat's personality is how they're socialized when young. Mine is pretty much the ideal cat because, I think, I made it really clear that I wasn't going to put up with the typical cat personality crap.

      Worth a couple grand? I dunno - mine cost me $5 at the local animal shelter. Hell, maybe he just came to grips with his own tender mortality at a young age and appreciates how I feed him and play with him.

    7. Re:Screw hypoallergenic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being outside for humans is also quite dangerous so does this means we should never go outside?

      Oh wait... this is slashdot!

    8. Re:Screw hypoallergenic... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      get a good cat book

      My cats are illiterate, you insensitive clod!

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    9. Re:Screw hypoallergenic... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I occasionally come across a live lizard in my home that has healed from it's wounds and seems to subsist on the spiders that infest my house.

      I'm not totally sure about your theory. My cats seem to bring in live animals so they can torture them in a more controlled environment.

      I do keep a trophy shelf with dried out lizard husks and bird wings, though, just to make sure I don't hurt their feelings if I'm wrong.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    10. Re:Screw hypoallergenic... by ad0gg · · Score: 1

      I want a cat that can kick itself. So i don't have to do it myself.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    11. Re:Screw hypoallergenic... by RedBear · · Score: 1

      How about a cat that doesn't shed, a cat that sleeps AT NIGHT instead of during the day, a cat that doesn't s**t behind the couch when you piss it off, a cat that is hairball resistant, a cat that doesn't care if the bowl isn't exactly full, a cat that can actually decide if it wants to be inside or outside (as opposed to wanting both simultaneously), a cat that views keyboards as natural preditors, a cat that will not release any "presents" in the house until said "gift" is completely DEAD, a cat that will actually kill said "gifts" that get into your house by other means, a cat that'll bring home USEFUL things instead of the typical birds, rabbits, mice, frogs... a new lawnmower would be nice once in awhile, or maybe some PC hardware - but no, it's always half-dead stuff.

      AKA, a dog.

    12. Re:Screw hypoallergenic... by Keebler71 · · Score: 1
      a cat that can actually decide if it wants to be inside or outside (as opposed to wanting both simultaneously),

      Eureka!!!! Now I know why Schrodinger used a cat for his thought experiment!

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    13. Re:Screw hypoallergenic... by Slur · · Score: 1

      I think what you got was a good trainable cat. When I met my cat at the shelter he was very attentive and made amazing eye-contact. He has been a very vocal cat, but not to excess or without cause. Every utterance he makes has a definite meaning.

      He knows me as well as I know him. He knows I'm lazy, and I know he's serious.

      The other thing is, he enjoys being flipped over his head in a somersault. He looks forward to being rolled over, and tucks his head in preparation if you grab his haunches. After each feeding he begs me to flip him. Whenever guests arrive at my house he won't let them be until he's been flipped.

      At this point, I'm actually not sure if it was he or me who trained the other in the whole flipping thing. Anyhow, unlike most cats mine has a "trick."

      Otherwise he's a real baby, a total lap-cat, and gets a small touch of separation anxiety whenever I'm not around. Fortunately he lives in a house where someone is almost always around.

      I will be offering clones of this cat to the general public at some point in the future - when cloning goes mainstream. Keep an eye out.

      --
      -- thinkyhead software and media
    14. Re:Screw hypoallergenic... by danila · · Score: 1
      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    15. Re:Screw hypoallergenic... by danila · · Score: 1

      And I forgot the Fur Real ones.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    16. Re:Screw hypoallergenic... by VeriTea · · Score: 1
      This is absolutely true. My family usually had one to three cats running around, as well as a few dogs and other assorted pets. With seven children in the house none of the pets got any 'babying', they were luck if they got fed.

      Our cats were incredibly sociable. They would eat anything you gave them, they always wanted to be held, they put up with the little kids pulling their tails or their ears without retaliating, they did their thing outside not inside, etc. It was a bit of a surprise to me that other people had a different experience with cats. We went through a lot of cats, so it wasn't like we just got lucky and got a few with good personalities

      --
      --- There are two kinds of people, those who accept dogmas and know it, and those who accept dogmas and don't know it
    17. Re:Screw hypoallergenic... by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      Actually, keeping the cats indoors might be the worst idea possible. Not only will they not get any exercise, but the vet bills will go through the roof (as will the home repair bills) when they tear each other (and everything else) to shreds. Outside, the three passives have got a few hundred acres to avoid the two terrors (and most fun) of the bunch. Inside... argh, perforations and lacerations on a weekly basis. Not a good idea, not for them, nor my couch, I think... :)

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    18. Re:Screw hypoallergenic... by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      By bringing you a live gift, they're showing that they care enough about you to give you the privilege of letting you kill it,

      Another theory is that they're running the ROM code for "teach a kitten to hunt". When a mommy cat sees that a kitten is totally incompetent, the first step in training is to bring it half-dead things so it can safely practice killing them.


      So, maybe they'd stop if they saw you demonstrate proficiency in stalking mice, catching them and severing their spinal cords with your teeth.

  70. Re:What next by FL180 · · Score: 1

    Oh, I don't know. My cat Charlie will play fetch with one of his toys. And both Elmo and Charlie respond to their names. Elmo won't play fetch though (and I have to admit that he's quite a bit more intelligent than Charlie is).

  71. can we also genetically engineer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people to smell less? How about engineering away crippling diseases? Modifying away those who are mentally inadequate? Or even just average? Hey, we could even abort cat fetuses if they are shown not to have the hypo-allergenic qualities we require? And why not the same with humans? We could breed a superior species, free of disease and disability!

  72. All You Need Is Love...and CatNip... by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

    The hypoallergenic cats produced by ALLERCA will allow consumers to enjoy the love and companionship of a pet...

    Heh. Love and companionship. You *do* realize you're talking about a CAT here...right?

  73. Hyper = Not necessarily bad... by swordboy · · Score: 1

    Heard on NPR...

    The day after Thanksgiving is the busiest days of the year for (stateside) allergenists. Why? Because millions of kids that had gone off to live at college have come home to the family pet(s). Now, mind you, the bulk of these students weren't allergic to the to the pet before leaving for school so... What happened?

    We'll, it is theorized that simply being around allergens stimulates immunity. This is likely why people that live on farms have the lowest percentage of allergies.

    Perhaps if we make a lot of stuff hypo-allergenic, we'll all get allergies.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:Hyper = Not necessarily bad... by Tongo · · Score: 1

      Something similar in my case. I am allergic to cats & dogs. An ex-gf of mine wanted a kitten so I broke down and we got one. After about 3-4 months of misery my reactions started to become less severe. By the time we broke up the cat didn't bother me anymore. I've also heard that getting the pet as a baby helps.

  74. you got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Allergies aren't only a matter of genetics, but commonly result from a combination of long-term malnutrition and long-term exposure to various toxic chemicals.

    Of course...no one will believe me...

  75. When they genetically engineer them so they... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    ...volunteer to be eaten I'll get one. The last one I got freaked out and tried to rip my eyes out when I got my chopper out. Didn't taste that good either, though it might have been because the spices in my curry sauce weren't all that fresh.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  76. Snip-Snip by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    There you go little kittie, not those rude bits won't be bothering you anymore.

    It's like the binary only version of a cat.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:Snip-Snip by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Remind me not to come around next time you "compile" your pets.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  77. FInally! by killermookie · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can eat Vietnamese food without the runny eyes and the sneezy.

  78. Re:What next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was actually man's earliest and most successful genetic experiment. We call them dogs.

  79. so what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do i get a clone if it dies? REpet??

  80. My cat hates you. by strabo · · Score: 1

    Just another reason why cats hate humans.

    MyCatHatesYou

  81. Possible IP theft? by changa · · Score: 1


    I wonder if they come sterilized to prevent copies from being made?

    1. Re:Possible IP theft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, in the world of plant strains, some (mostly sold in other countries) are engineered to be sterile, so the farmer has to buy seed from the company every year instead of saving some and planting it. I believe it's called the Terminator gene modification. Big issue in some countries (farmers go bankrupt). See the works of Vandana Shiva et. al.

    2. Re:Possible IP theft? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      We at Alerca prefer to call our kitties DRMed.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    3. Re:Possible IP theft? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be GRMed? (Genetical Rights Management)
      After all, a cat isn't digital.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  82. Where are the activists? by Thai-Pan · · Score: 1

    I'm going to go out on a limb and assume that animal rights activists and creationists are up in arms about how this is "playing God." Personally I think this is a pretty cool idea. Will they next make pets that smell better? Basset hounds that don't STINK? Will those funny purebred ones that need their anal glands drained on a regular basis no longer need it? Can they make different animals shed less, or have longer or shorter fur?

    Maybe down the road we'll get to mix and match dog personalities with different dog bodies too. I love Siberian Huskies, but the damn things are way too hyper for my lifestyle. Or maybe I want a great dane miniaturized to live in an apartment?

    Come to think of it, some breeds of pets are naturally cleaner than others in terms of behaviour. Cats are very clean (other than the fur they leave everywhere), some dogs are pretty clean, some are filthy.. I wonder if a genetic tweak could make my girlfriend's ferret have a higher litter pan hit/miss ratio.

  83. WTF by CmdrChillupa · · Score: 1

    What I mean to say is.... I for one welcome our new genetically engineered feline overlords.

  84. Vaporware by Locarius · · Score: 0

    Looks like vaporware to me...

  85. Don't think so by signe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yeah, I'm not buying it. Digging back, we find that Allerca claims to be owned by Geneticas. If we check out the other "companies" under that umbrella, we'll find Genequus, who claim to do horse cell banking and cloning. Yes, that's right. They'll sell you a clone of your horse for $100k. Discounts for 10 or more.

    Another one, LifeARK, claims to be doing cell banking for endangered animals. They want donations, and they accept them through PayPal. Don't think so. A large company that was doing such work wouldn't deal with PayPal's onerous agreement and high fees. Especially not if their other divisions were dealing with large sums of money already.

    ForeverPet does cell banking for companion pets. But they can't yet clone them. But another division can clone horses? Yeah, right.

    --
    "The details of my life are quite inconsequential..."
    1. Re:Don't think so by tenordave · · Score: 1

      Um, they say this right on the foreverpet page: ``It is widely believed that the technology to affordably clone many pet species from properly preserved tissue is close at hand. Cat and horse cloning is now a reality, and dog cloning is expected to follow soon.''

      --
      http://students.washington.edu/djwatson
    2. Re:Don't think so by Epistax · · Score: 1

      There's one company where one division markets cigarettes to minors. The other division fills my omelets which cheesy goodness. I don't think either is at all capable of doing both.

    3. Re:Don't think so by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      These people sound like a front for the Raelians, the creepy UFO cult and hoax cloners. (No no--the other creepy UFO cult.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Don't think so by rarity · · Score: 1
      Another one, LifeARK, claims to be doing cell banking for endangered animals. They want donations, and they accept them through PayPal.

      OK, I'll bite - exactly how does one donate tissue samples via PayPal? Last I heard, they only dealt with money.

    5. Re:Don't think so by Tarwn · · Score: 1

      Ok, and if you can send tissue samples via Pay-Pal, why do I keep paying for plane tickets?

      --
      Whee signature.
    6. Re:Don't think so by SilkBD · · Score: 1

      Paypal's fees are in line with what it cost to be able to accept credit cards directly using a merchant account. Dare I say, Paypal is even cheaper. Additionally, paypal doesn't require personal guarantee's from business owners or credit checks.

      --
      00101010
  86. Sure path to riches by Xeger · · Score: 1

    1) Buy a male Allercat and a female Allercat
    2) ???
    3) Profit!

  87. Not the First Kittens by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 0
    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  88. Consumers... by noidentity · · Score: 1

    The hypoallergenic cats produced by ALLERCA will allow consumers to enjoy the love and companionship of a pet without the cost, inconvenience, risk, and limited effectiveness of current allergy treatments.

    Yes, but will they cause an allergic reaction if I consume them?

  89. I dont want a cat. by LordZardoz · · Score: 1

    What I want is a genetically engineered cockroach that is the size of a common house cat. Now that would be a pet worth having.

    END COMMUNICATION

    1. Re:I dont want a cat. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      You read too much Bruce Sterling.

      I won't go to 2nd level meditation, but I will grant that the gun is good.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  90. The ideal pet by slars · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I'm going to fork over that kind of money, I think I'll just head to Japan, and buy Sony's latest release - Dog 3.2. I won't have to worry about the "sprinkler effect", no allergies, no puking on the carpet, no "I'm mad cuz you went on vacation and didn't take me" dumps on your bed, and 4 D batteries monthly has GOT to be cheaper than Science Diet. Am I right?

  91. Re:What next by rjstanford · · Score: 1

    Its been shown - by trainers - that cats can be trained just as easily as dogs can. Its just that when you tell a dog, "Go get the paper," and it looks at you all cute and whines, you keep working at it. When you tell a cat, "Go get the paper," and it walks away, your natural tendancy is to say, "Oh, well, cats can't be trained."

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  92. Bovine felines? by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 1
    From the summary:

    you can take delivery of a cuddy non-sinus bothering bundle of joy

    Ye gods, did they accidentally slip some cow genes into the mixing vat? Hairballs are bad enough - having a cat that reguritates and rechews its lunch just isn't high on my "desired features" list. ;-)

    --
    A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
  93. Doomed to Failure by gnuLNX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So what is to keep someone from buying a male and a female...breeding them...etc. Or is their some patent on the cat's sex. I can't see how this company can sell more than perhaps 3 years worth of these cats.

    --
    what?
    1. Re:Doomed to Failure by Euphorea · · Score: 1

      I think that a vast amount of research would have to be put into this sort of thing, they would have to be sure that if their gene modded cats are able to breed, what kind of effects would there be on the combined altered DNA? Would they even be able to successfully breed? Would the company engineer them in such a way to prevent them from breeding in order to control their monopoly on the market? I would think that would have to be the case, as it would also be a built-in "safety" feature to prevent strange mutant cats from being created... however, odd mutations and evolution over time of these "breeding-free" animals may cause them to suddenly be able to breed... nature wants to create, take away that ability and it may just find a way around it...

    2. Re:Doomed to Failure by spacefrog · · Score: 1

      You don't honestly think they are going to be delivered with genitals intact do you????

      (roll to sound of manaical laughter)

  94. Hypoalergenic, but still a cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call me when they have: police cats; guide cats; sled cats; guard cats or basically any kind of cat that is in any way useful to people.

    Oh, alright, they are good for rodent control -- help squelch parental yearnings in careerists, make premium guitar strings and decent stirfry.

    But other than that, what have the Roman...er... cats ever done for us.

  95. what i really want is real pocket pussy ;-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how long until we can buy real living pussy???

  96. This is great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just took a Claritin so that I can go over my friend's house later and watch the Red Sox game without sneezing. Claritin's fucking expensive, and I shouldn't have to pay money just because cats suck.

  97. Does this remind anyone of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Blade Runner? What next - genetically engineered unintelligent midget's to play with?

  98. Geneticlly cloned mutant by NachoDaddy · · Score: 1

    So if I pay $3500 for this super cat. is there a EULA?
    Can I make a backup copy of him:
    http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/8/prweb15 1519.h tm
    or would this violate the DMCA?

  99. What has two legs and bleeds profusely? by themaidtricks · · Score: 0, Troll

    Half a cat.

  100. What if they fail? by cory_p82 · · Score: 1

    But... what if they never develop this cat? Straight from their "Reservation and Purchase Agreement"...

    Purchaser agrees to pay and remit to the Company herewith a holding deposit of $250.00, which shall be non-refundable whether or not a Cat is ever produced or delivered

    There goes your money.

    I think I'm going to do the same thing... Maybe I'll "genetically engineer" a ferret that doesn't stink, a dog that doesn't crap on your floor, and fish that you don't need to feed. And then take your money for "preorders".

    Mwahahaha!

    1. Re:What if they fail? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Make sure you come up with a flashy business plan. The real money is in playing the VCs.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  101. Completely pointless by lukestuts · · Score: 1

    Why pay thousands when you can just shave Mr Bigglesworth!

  102. Cat who cares by javamann · · Score: 1

    Now if only they could create a cat who cares.

  103. Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Meowulf cluster of these things!

  104. Glow-in-the-Dark Deer from the same company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.geneticas.com/divisions.html/

    ALLERCA - The Allergy Free Cat

    Currently, most treatments for cat allergies focus on avoidance, allergy shots, and pharmaceuticals. Avoidance can mean either choosing to live without a pet, or making considerable alterations in one's living environment to avoid excessive exposure to cat allergens.

    ALLERCA will produce the world's first allergen-free cats. We expect the birth of these first special kittens in early 2006. The cat allergen is a well-studied protein that has not been shown to be essential to the health of the animal; therefore, removal of the allergen should simply make these cats better companions for people with allergies.

    FOREVERPET - Companion Pet Cloning and Banking

    Leading-edge health management or cloning of any animal is a highly personal and often emotional issue. FOREVERPET's mission is not simply to offer the hope of cloning but rather to offer the animal's owner an opportunity to participate in the rapid advances in biotechnology, genetic engineering and animal health science. Animals can be valued for many reasons - a Siberian tiger in danger of extinction, a seeing eye dog with all the right natural instincts, or a loved companion pet.

    Preserving your pet's cells today for use in producing a clone in the future is as simple as a phone call to ForeverPet and a trip to your veterinarian's office. Your vet will take a small skin sample from the animal (often with just local anesthesia) and send it to ForeverPet. This procedure will typically not cause your pet to experience any interruption in activity. Properly cryopreserved cells remain living and viable indefinitely.

    FOREVERPET cannot guarantee that cloning your particular pet, organ regeneration or genetic cures for diseases will be available in two years, ten years or ever. Yet unless you preserve your animal's genetic material, it is most unlikely that you and your pet will have any options to participate in the future advances in these areas.

    GENEQUUS - Equine Cloning and Banking

    GENEQUUS is the global leader in equine cloning, and the only company producing equine clones on a commercial basis.

    Protected by patented proprietary technologies, and with proven equine clones "on the ground", GENEQUUS launched commercial horse cloning in 2005, with the first yearlings expected on general sale in 2006.

    GENEQUUS provides a variety of different services, both to the horse owner and the horse buyer.

    THE ARK - Endangered Species Cloning and Banking

    The GENETICAS ARK, a not-for-profit foundation, has an important but daunting task ahead: to create the world's largest gene bank of rare and endangered animals before they disappear forever.

    In what is undoubtedly the greatest conservation project in recent years, the GENETICAS ARK aims to do what no other conversation effort has managed to date - GUARANTEE that animal species survive, regardless of the dangers they currently face in their natural habitats. We applaud the efforts of large and small conversation groups, but in many ways, we all agree that anyone involved in the conservation of precious species is losing an uphill battle. No matter how much money is spent, or how large an effort is made, hunting, logging, poaching and encroachment into wild habitats goes on unabated.

    GENETIATE - Transgenic Animal Services

    With over 500,000 collisions between cars and deer every year, the cost in lives and money is staggering.

    While insurers pay over a billion dollars in claims annually, over 200 people are killed. Countless other drivers and passengers suffer injuries and other serious medical complications. Many deer and their young suffer the same fate.

    By implanting the gene of a special jellyfish into deer, the transgenic NIGHTSAVE deer produced by GENETIATE (patent pending) have fluorescing hair and skin when illuminated by car headlights. The implanted gene has no

  105. They haven't even been successful yet by Art_Vandelai · · Score: 1
    From the EULA:

    " In the event that the Company successfully produces a certified hypo-allergenic cat, the $250.00 deposit provided herein shall be credited towards the Purchase Price."

    Oh yeah, the $250 is non-refundable too. And if they do come up with a cat, they don't guarantee that it's $3500 - it could be WAAAAY more. Scam, perhaps, or ingenious way to raise funds for the research?

  106. Save your money by AaronW · · Score: 1

    My parents have a Bengal cat. One thing about Bengals is they are also hypoallergenic for most people. A friend of the family was deathly allergic to cats, yet this cat didn't bother him at all, even though the cat would rub all over his head whenever he sat on the couch and sleep on his bed when he stayed over.

    Bengals are a lot less than $3500, but they can be quite a handfull in terms of temperament. Bengals are a cross between a housecat and an Asian leopard.

    -Aaron

    --
    This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
  107. Nice folks. by Verminator · · Score: 1
    Hundreds of dogs & cats being executed (euthanized) daily for want of a home or storage space.

    "You could adopt an animal and save a life, but hey, ours come in five designer colors!"

    --
    "The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." - Tacitus
  108. vapour publicity too by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
    I love this part:
    Allerca in the news
    The interest in ALLERCA'S first lifestyle pet, the hypoallergenic cat, has been tremendous. Featured in many newspapers, magazines, radio, television and top web sites, read what the press has to say.
    Clicking on the link takes you to a page saying:
    October 2004
    Coming soon.
    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:vapour publicity too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      October 2004
      Coming soon.

      October 2004 is coming soon? Someone needs to update their calander!
  109. $3500, Ouch by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    I'm allergic to the price tag.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  110. Why stop at cats? by msblack · · Score: 1

    Any chance of Allerca offering hypoallergenic people? Eugenics sounds like an obvious next step. Would love to see elimination of the Bush family lineage, annoying cell phone users, SUV drivers, etc.

    --
    signature pending slashdot approval
  111. Re:What next by FL180 · · Score: 1

    I'd believe that. Elmo won't play fetch, but he'll sit on command...well...sometimes it takes two or three commands (and my ex used to say that he just got tired of standing there listening to me).

  112. The Price by scribblej · · Score: 1

    I see a lot of comments here referring to the high price of the cats.

    I'd just like to point out that any pedigreed dog will cost you $500-$3500 (the high end for males, the low end for females).

    "Good" pets aren't cheap. Take "good" as you like it; my cats are not pedigreed and are fantastic pets.

  113. Bah! by chinton · · Score: 1

    What a useless waste of space. I'm holding out for a chairdog!

  114. Things not found in nature by ExTex · · Score: 1

    What next, girlfriends for Slashdotters?

  115. I doubt this is real. by Bob+Davis,+Retired · · Score: 1

    As someone who doesn't just have allergies, but asthma also, I doubt this is real.

    In the past decade or so there have been anti-allergy lotions for cats, pills for cats, and other treatments too. They're all expensive and completely worthless. If a cat scratches me, I get a huge welt running down the length of the scratch that weeps lymph (yummm). If a cat licks me, I get a welt. If I pet a cat, and then touch any part of my face without washing my hands vigorously, I turn into a sneezing, runny nose / watery eyed mess.

  116. Hypo allergenic? How about hypo poopagenic? by Grendel_Prime · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nevermind the allergens, how about engineering a cat that won't poop or pee?

  117. Funny cat names by Country_hacker · · Score: 1

    We named ours No Name Kitty, or N2K for short. It was actually my little brother's idea, he's 12 and currently memorizing the periodic table just for fun. [sniff...] Just like his older brother. ;-)

    --
    Never give any object more potential energy than you want it to have.
    1. Re:Funny cat names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think "Ceefer" is the best cat name i've heard.

      Ceefer cat...

    2. Re:Funny cat names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Deefer dog is quite common around here, but the funniest dog name i ever saw was "deeoge" (think Dierdre). Just dosent have the same ring for ceeayte...

  118. RESERVATIONS by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 2, Informative

    I wouldn't be betting 3500$ on this at the moment.

    Me neither. But if I could afford $3500 for a cat, I might be willingly to bet the amount they are actually requesting for a deposit ($250):

    "Please note that reservations require a deposit of $250 that will apply to the purchase price. On completion of your online reservation, we will provide you with an attractive personalized ALLERCA Reservation Certificate."

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  119. Cat allergies are a good thing by liquidsin · · Score: 1

    Without allergies, Schrodinger probably would never have tried to kill his cat.

    --
    do not read this line twice.
  120. "Hypoallergenic" is a myth by sanermind · · Score: 5, Informative

    The term 'hypoallergenic' is not meaningful in any scientific sense whatsoever.

    The FDA states that "There are no federal standards or definitions that govern the use of the term 'hypoallergenic'." Back in 1973, they tried to establish definitions for the use of the term hypoallergenic, but the regulation was overturned in court.

    A little bit of googling returns this

    It's a nonsense marketing claim, with no scientific standard or basis. People can be allergic to anything... even themselves.

    --

    ---
    the pen is mightier than the sword, the sword is mightier than the court, the court is mightier than the pen.
    1. Re:"Hypoallergenic" is a myth by m0llusk · · Score: 1

      In a general context that may be true, but this is a specific context. That is, the marketing materials for this product identify a specific allergen that is not present in the product. There are a number of common allergens that are highly problematic. Latex is a good example. Hypoallergenic latex alternatives are not expected to be free of all potential allergens, just free of those allergens present in latex. If you have a better word, then it might be readily adopted, but the word hypoallergenic is reasonably descriptive of what is going on.

  121. Money and housebreaking by Pi_0's+don't+shower · · Score: 1

    I don't know why this is such a recurring theme here on /., but people seem to love to talk about these Rube Goldberg-type solutions to problems that involve a myriad of technology, when they can be solved quickly and easily for cheap. Why spend $3500 for a hypo-allergenic cat (that doesn't stop all allergies, just the one to the specific protein engineered out of them), when you can spend $15 for a month's prescription of zyrtec. $15 * 12 months * 15 years (life of cat) = $2160, is still much less than $3500.

    As for housebreaking: I have two cats. The cats were kept with their housebroken mother for the first 5 months of their lives. (The first two is sufficient.) During that time, the mother will automatically housebreak the cats. If these cats are kept with their mother for the first two months of their lives, their future owners will be thankful for it. As an aside, the one thing that burns me up about the pet population problem are these young girls (~20) who LoooooooooooOOOOOooooove kittens. You know, love kittens, until they're about 5-6 months old. (You know, my cats when I got them.) But by that time, the kittens are big, adult sized cats, and they don't want them anymore. So, off to the shelter they go, to be replaced by... MORE KITTENS. I don't know how many pets are euthanized because of stupid people in this fashion... but I'm happy that I did my part to save 2.

  122. yeah but by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny
    those cats might be free-as-in-beer, but they are not free-as-in-speech. Call me when there's an open source cat.

    Of course, the only truly free cat will be free-as-in-willy....

    1. Re:yeah but by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if you're old enough to remember this.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  123. Wish granted... by Saeger · · Score: 1
    Per your request we have modified a Yorkie to NOT pee on your carpet. We didn't do this by modifying its expressed behavior (no, that would be too hard), but by splicing in a Great White Shark gene that allows your new & improved pet to urinate through its skin(TM) just like a shark!*

    MSRP $9500. Enjoy!

    * side effects include: sharper teeth; increased tendency to bite; a strange smell due to the fact that dogs don't constantly swim/bathe in the ocean.

    --

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
    1. Re:Wish granted... by Loren_Burlingame · · Score: 1

      a strange smell due to the fact that dogs don't constantly swim/bathe in the ocean. As if they (dogs in general, but especially Yorkies due to the long hair) don't smell bad enough already...

    2. Re:Wish granted... by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      I could modify a Yorkie to not pee on the carpet the old-fashioned MacGyver way...

      A clothespin. (Ouch...)

  124. Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the cat goes traipsing around in the poison ivy outside and comes back to sit on my lap, what then?

  125. Way too expensive... and too late! by Swift+Kick · · Score: 1

    We don't need $3500 hypo-allergenic cats from some wacky company! We can get allergen-free cats with much higher decorative value and incredible conversation pieces from BonsaiKitten.
    These guys have been around for a bit longer, and their method has been tried and tested. You can easily make your own with a few easy-to-find tools, for a fraction of the cost, and definitely eye-catchers.

    (Laugh a little, folks ;P)

    --
    "We'll need 2000 crickets, 4 cans of Easy Cheese, and the fluid from 18 glowsticks for this plan to work...." - ph0n1c
  126. Nguyen Van Tranh says.... by vudufixit · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Ummmm... these hypo-allergenic cats are yummy, and certainly worth the $3500 price tag."

  127. Blimy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having one of those "THE FUTURE IS NOW" moments. Give me a second, please.

  128. story behind the story by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

    So there are these two hotshot scientist, malcom gefter at mit and irv weismmann at stanford, and they form this hotshot biotech company, immulogic, with oodles of venture capital money, to revolutionize clincial medicine, or at least the parts of medicine related to allergies and stuff like that.
    So they have this technology, and they look around, and they decide a "vaccine" (actually a tolerizing antigen stimulation for you cognocesnti) against cat allergies is the thing. They find, as the story goes, a lady living in an apt with a zillion or so cats. They go in their with vacumn cleaners from Sears, vacumn up everyting, take it back to their state of the art biotech facility...and a few months later, they show that it is a glycoprotein in cat saliva that is the actual allergen.
    They spend a little more (here little is in the 7 figure range) and get to a phase I clinical trial. Sadly, the vaccine does nothing, and ImmuLogic winds up on the dustbin of biotech history; the only thing ImmuLogic revolutionized was the scientist bank accounts.

  129. More economics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I have 12 children on welfare and they *need* a cat. $15 * 12 children * 12 months * 5 years (life of cat in our house) = a bigger number.

    That's why we simply steal your pets when we want a new one.

  130. When can I get one with nine asses? by istewart · · Score: 1

    I think that Dr. Mephisto's prices might be slightly less exorbitant.

    1. Re:When can I get one with nine asses? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      You're still going to need duct tape to keep the cat from splitting.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  131. Big woop by defishguy · · Score: 1

    I'll buy into this when they come up with a cash-allergic woman!

  132. oh shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The engineered-animal market is now open for business.

    They'll have cobras with saline venom. And Pandas THAT ACTUALLY FUCK. Monkeys that don't fling shit. Beagles that aren't fat-as-all-getout and don't suffer from loneliness. They'll have parrots that don't hiss at you. And "pond seeder" trout, that have extreme fertility for 10 generations, then "average" fertility after that.

    This is going to get crazy, really quick.

  133. Gene Silencing is a treatment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gene Silencing is the technique they are using. Gene Silencing http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/ghr/glossary/genesilencing is used while the gene in question is being expressed (i.e., during cell operation). It will be a treatment provided to the cat and will not be inheritable.

  134. Specifically, parasites by spun · · Score: 1

    Read an article some time ago in SciAm, showing that people exposed to parasites don't develop allergies. The idea is, the allergic response of swelling and increased blood flow is meant to trap and destroy parasites. Without parasites to fight, our immune system latches on to proteins that look like they could be parasites.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  135. I'm reading Oryx and Crake... by Leomania · · Score: 1

    ... by Margaret Atwood so this scares the pants off me. There are all sorts of genetically modified animals in that book and they're really scary, like the wolvogs (part wolf, part dog) that look nice and happy but take your hand off if they can get at you. I don't like where this sort of thing may be going...

    - Leo

    --
    You don't use science to show that you're right, you use science to become right.
    1. Re: I'm reading Oryx and Crake... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Haven't read the book, but Wolves and Dogs are of the same species. Dogs are, more or less, domesticated wolves. Some breeds are a lot closer to wolves than others, of course.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re: I'm reading Oryx and Crake... by solipsiae · · Score: 1

      To every wolvog, there is a raskunk. Rakunk. Whatever "Killer" was.

  136. No Shit! by lowy · · Score: 1


    Hey Allerca,

    If you can design a dog that doesn't crap please sign me up for one right now!

    lowy

  137. Bullshit. by Hizonner · · Score: 0
    Breeders are the primary reason why we have such a terrible overpopulation problem in this country.

    No, the primary reasons for pet overpopulation are feral breeding (for cats, mostly), "accidental" breeding of household pets, and home breeding by owners who aren't by any reasonable definition breeders. There aren't enough breeders out there to make that much impact. Not that I entirely approve of breeding cats or dogs, but the claim that breeders are a "primary" overpopulation cause doesn't even pass the laugh test.

    Not only do they encourage people to buy, instead of rescuing, but they usually dump off "bad" litters on the side of the road or at your local pound.

    I've met dozens of high-end show cat breeders, and been in a position to have a general idea of the structure of their breeding programs and the fates of their litters. I've never seen any evidence of even one of them doing any such thing. In fact, most of the ones I've met volunteer for purebred rescue in addition to placing or keeping every animal they breed. Where's your evidence for this assertion?

    Furthermore, mixed-breed animals are more likely to end up in shelters than purebred animals.

    Don't believe everything you hear from PETA, or even down at the local shelter.

  138. anti genetically engineered by mr_angry · · Score: 1

    call me a freak, but i don't like the idea of tweaking living things. Genetically modified foods and animals, i can live without them.

    What is it with science... we want to travel to mars and have hypo allergic cats but like half of the planet is starving...

    No i can sense that someone will come and tell me that genetically modified foods could save the world. If so, why are the other half of the planet starving now ??

    --
    100% of statistics are wrong.
  139. Re:Doomed to Failure - NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gene Silencing is the technique they are using. Gene Silencing http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/ghr/glossary/genesilencing is used while the gene in question is being expressed. It will be a treatment provided to the cat and will not be inheritable.

  140. clue for the clueless by poptones · · Score: 1

    You have any proof she has allowed the dog to breed?

    Dogs breed when they are allowed. Dogs breed uncontrollably when they are not properly cared for ie when they are allowed to run free. There are horror stories in every walk of life, but it's rare that someone who paid several hundred or thousands of dollars for an animal will allow it to roam the neighborhood unguarded.

    A purebred dog that's been castrated is nothing but a pet. it might be a really, really, really "special" pet - but it's still just a pet. Dog breeders are not going to have their very best animals castrated, but they also cannot keep an entire farm of them. So, they allow others to "co-own" the animals - again, this isn't rare.

    When you "buy" a registered animal that is not sterilized, it's usually a co-ownership, meaning if you mistreat or endanger the animal and the other owner (ie the breeder) finds out about it, you lose the animal and forfeit your purchase.

    That said, the price they are charging for these animals is ridiculous. I'm one of those people who likes cats but just cannot stand to be near them. My allergy to cats is so bad I honestly believe if left in the house with one for more than a day it would become impossible for me to breath (much less see). In addition I suffer terrible allergies to many types of trees and grasses - basically, growing up in the midwest, the outdoors for me has never been a pleasant experience.

    But I am taking steps to reduce this reaction by taking allergy shots. It costs about $500 for six months or so of these shots (not counting syringes and additional Dr. visits if needed). After about two years I am told my allergies will be in check for another decade or so, which means after spending about $2000 (roughly half the price of just one of these cats) I'll be able to enjoy being around ANY cat - including those owned by my friends and family. It's not a permanent fix, but it's one that benefits ME, anywhere I find myself at any time - and cats are not immortal, either.

    Honestly, this just seems to me like a stupid waste of money for the owner and a transparent attempt at putting a happy, friendly face on the controversial field of high tech genetic engineering.

  141. Evolution has problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just curious why people are so accepting of 'macro-evolutionary theory' when there are so many holes in it. It looks like current scientific evidence points toward inteligent design theory.

    If macro-evolution is true, then there must be tons of transitional species in the fossil record - but there aren't (if you know of any please let me know; I'd love to research them). Surely, micro-evolution is true: we see this all the time in dog breeds and in the famous Galopogos Finches, but aren't they still dogs and finches and weren't they always dogs and finches? What about the human eye? How did something so complex evolve from nothing? Natural selection would have weeded it out unless it benefited the creature, but it isn't beneficial until tons of intricate outrageously complex parts all fire on the same cylinder.

    Natural selection doesn't allow for complex life to exist at all if it presupposes that everything evolved from prehistoric goo.

    Is natural selection going to select out all of the homosexuals in the world because they don't reproduce? Just some questions that I'd love to hear answers to! :)

    fender98528@hotmail.com

    1. Re:Evolution has problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck intelligent design.

  142. Yeah but... by getnate · · Score: 1

    Do they come with a warranty?

  143. A cheaper solution by spun · · Score: 1

    Simply keep your cats coated with petroleum jelly and scrape them clean once a week like we do. Keeps the dander out of the air. Now if only I could figure out what to do about these oil stains on the furniture...

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  144. Additional spec request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Transparent, so it can stand between me and the monitor and I won't care.

  145. First 'lifestyle pets'.... by shadwwulf · · Score: 1

    ...up next re-pets. (6th Day)

    Something about this is quite disturbing.

    MTW

  146. How bout a man's pet? by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
    I would pay good money for a truly non-allergic dog, to the tune of several grand. I mean, I wouldn't replace my current dog no matter what, but ya know, when it comes time to get the next dog.... I love this guy, but despite the fact that poodles shed less and supposedly have less dander than shorthaired dogs, I am still mildly allergic to him (and he's small, so he has less skin and less fur to begin with). Anyway, the reaction I have is much more mild than with most shorthair breeds, but the "hypoallergenic breed" claims about longhaired dogs seem to be a bit overstated. For the most part a daily Claritin suppresses any meaningful allergic response, but I a still more prone to asthma attacks with the dog around.


    The real kicker is you're supposed to groom poodles regularly. The problem is the one time when I have a real allergic reaction is when I try to brush my dog.


    As for cats, I simply have no use for them, hypoallergenic or otherwise (and I am severely allergic to the annoying little furballs).

    1. Re:How bout a man's pet? by iso · · Score: 1

      Your "man's pet" is a poodle? Seriously?

    2. Re:How bout a man's pet? by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      I think I must have edited the part of my post where I explained that poodles don't have to have those effeminate looking poodle-cuts you see in shows. Most normal people wouldn't do that to their pets. So no, poodles are not themselves unmanly, that reputation has been created by people who show them in dog shows.


      And while it may not be optimally manly to have a toy-sized dog, it's a matter of convenience here in New York City - it's not really fair to put a big country dog into a little New York apartment and expect them to be happy.


      My dog likes to play catch and play with his toys, to sit on his bed by my feet when I'm watching TV or if I'm at the computer, and to be petted. He also guards our door vigilantly - he really doesn't know he's as small as he is, and will sometimes put on a rather violent display when unknown people show up at the door.


      So is he as macho as a boxer (very manly - we had one when I was a little kid, other male dogs would either cower or fight when he came by) or a german shepherd? No, but we are comparing to freaking cats here.

  147. Transgenic Pets by stefie10 · · Score: 1

    Another company tried to do this a few years ago: Transgenic Pets As I recall, the cats were supposed to be available in 2002. Now, they took down their website - it's been in the process of being updated for months.

  148. Copyright Implications by Hyperbolix · · Score: 1

    Does anyone forsee copyright issues with this? What happens if I get two cats, a male and female, and they breed. Suppose the babies are also hypoallergenic. Suppose I cannot keep the litter of kittens and wish to sell them. I'd undercut the price of the original kitten in the interest of selling them quickly, but what happens if the cats copy themselves without my knowledge? I can't stop the cats from screwing... God knows they want to. Will I be liable for patent or copyright violation of the cat's reproduce naturally, or if I say it was natural?

    Advocating the Devil,
    John B.

  149. Glowing deer too! by craftyimp · · Score: 1

    http://www.genetiate.com/projects.html

    Just what we need ...

  150. Can I borrow your Birkenstocks? by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    Mine got worn out from stomping kittens.

    ----------

    I still agree with the grandparent in that breeding a clawless cat is a lot more humane than having regular cats declawed.

    --

    +++ATH0
  151. plagiarism by figurewmeat · · Score: 1

    I wonder who is being copied?

    is it
    http://www.allerca.com/html/development.html
    or
    http://www.xmission.com/~emailbox/trivia.htm
    or
    just the cats?

  152. siamese can be really friendly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey -- I have _two_ siamese, and they happen to be the friendliest, most people-loving cats ever. They even love to sleep on people during parties, but won't pester you if you want them to go away. everyone says that they're more like dogs than cats. I even can walk them on a leash, which they love (I'm not in a safe place to let them outside on their own)! So -- no insulting Siamese purrsonalities, dammit. (The only problem anyone has ever had with my Siamese is if they're allergic to cats!!!)

  153. Get a spell checker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You misspelled appropriate.

    Hope this helps!

  154. You can already get an allergen-free cat for free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  155. Jerry Was a Man by klausner · · Score: 1
    This calls to mind Heinlein's short story, Jerry Was a Man. Want a pegasus? A miniature elephant? A pet talking chimp? No problem. All it takes is money.

    Oh, and we do genetically designed slaves too.

  156. I'll Take Two!! by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    I plan to launch my own line of Hypo-allergenic cats in 2008.

  157. Allergen Fel d 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How are they making hypoallergenic cats:
    knocking out the gene Fel d 1.
    Check out pubmed:
    Crystal structure of Fel d 1

    From this article (you need special access to get it) they say that "Fel d 1 elicits IgE [an immunoglobulin of the human that elicits the immune response] responses in 90-95% of patients with cat allergy and accounts for 60-90% of the total allergenic activity in cat dander"

    And this is interesting, there is so much cat dander floating around that:

    "The data showing that 80% of Swedish children with cat allergies never had lived with a cat imply that the concentrations of cat allergen in schools or in houses without a cat are sufficient to cause sensitization." Abstract on Animal Danders

    So does this mean that even if you get your great cat, you still will be sensitized to it?

    The other thing is I have been unable in my brief search, find out what fel d 1 is to the cat. Allerca says deletion is harmless to the cat, but I can't find any info except that it is a member of the secretoglobulin family. Immunoglobulins generally have conserved folds with often distinct structures (think conserved scaffold structure), I think a secretoglobulin would be something similar.

    Essentially what this company claims they have the technology for is to create gene knockout cats for the fel d 1 gene.

  158. hmmm... bad by mekanizer · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many cats they "missed" before producing these ones... I think any company "touching" the cat/dog genetic should not get any money because of the abuse involed, may be the cats need the removed gene too.

  159. Lack of legal definition does not equal myth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The term 'red' is not meaningful in any scientific sense whatsoever.

    There are no federal standards or definitions that govern the use of the term 'red'.

    It's a nonsense marketing claim, with no scientific standard or basis. People will see anything as red if only red light is shining on it ... even themselves.

    1. Re:Lack of legal definition does not equal myth. by sanermind · · Score: 1

      Ummm... That is a very bad counterexample. 'Red' light is scientifically quantifiable quite precisely, that is, electromagnetic radiation having a wavelength of ~625 - 740 nanometers [closer to orange at 625, approaching infrared beyond 740].

      As to the (perhaps implied) arguement about federal standards or definitions having any relevance to scientific truth, well there could be some arguement there, I suppose. The point being, though, that there is no real way to set a true standard, because peoples immune systems can become sensitive to just about anything. There is no such thing as a hypoallerginic product... well, maybe pure water or something like that. :)

      --

      ---
      the pen is mightier than the sword, the sword is mightier than the court, the court is mightier than the pen.
    2. Re:Lack of legal definition does not equal myth. by cot · · Score: 1

      "'Red' light is scientifically quantifiable quite precisely" ... "~625 - 740 nanometers"

      -insert standard princess bride quote here-

      Claiming that the term hypoallergenic is subjective and therefore the claim should be taken with a grain of salt is totally reasonable. However, claiming that the term is totally meaningless, well, there's just one word for that. Idiocy.

      Some things will, statistically speaking, aggravate the allergies of more people than other things. If item B is found to aggravate the allergies of far fewer people than item A while otherwise serving the same function, there ought to be a way to describe that positive aspect of item B.

      --

  160. Not in california by promethean_spark · · Score: 1

    These are sure to be lumped in with those oh so dangerous glow-in-the-dark zebrafish and similarly banned in CA.

  161. Delivery? by supabeast! · · Score: 1

    And just how the hell does one deliver a cat? I would think that Fedex and UPS ground are out...

    1. Re:Delivery? by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      For $3500, a company employee driving a company car with a well-appointed pet area in the back better be it.

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
  162. Planet of the Apes.... by Xiver · · Score: 1

    Down with the genetically engineered pet. I'm going to start selling monkeys.

    --
    10: PRINT "Everything old is new again."
    20: GOTO 10
  163. You're missing something by devphil · · Score: 1


    Yeah, pregnancies take 58 to 65 days. How long starting from a test tube?

    Heck, even during growth you keep having to transplant them to larger and larger test tubes.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  164. Check this crazy cat out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Check this crazy cat out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry about crappy link... here's a better one.

  165. The next step... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when will I be able to get my hypoallergenic clone? I'll send them a cell sample from my cat, they can modify the genes and send me back my cat less the allergies.

    Come to think of it, there are some people who could use some improvement too...

  166. Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Maybe they could splice in some dog genes to get a cat that wags it's tail and plays fetch."

    Actually, we have bengal cats and they do wag their tails and play fetch. ...

    I also trained one to jump through a hoop on command and sit up on command for a treat. I have videos.

    And they already exist in the world, for much less than $3500 a cat. AND they don't affect people with cat allergies.

  167. Pussy? by sammy_cda · · Score: 1

    That's a lot of money for some pussy.

  168. Does anyone else find it a bit disturbing by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

    to see the words "produce" and "develop" applied to living things?

    1. Re:Does anyone else find it a bit disturbing by heng-tseu · · Score: 1

      And how! But the brainwashing goes so deep that you can't really expect anyone to notice such details.

    2. Re:Does anyone else find it a bit disturbing by heng-tseu · · Score: 1

      Regarding the universal brainwashing - I was not exempt myself: at medical school I cut open alive drugged rats, just to study them, and didn't find anything unusual about that, like anyone else around me - at least nobody said anything. The rats were afterwards thrown away. Only years later it started to dawn on me what I was doing to a living being. Then I started to understand why some people were against vivisection - previously I, like most people had dismissed them as cranks.

  169. Obligatory South Park Quote by BiggRanger · · Score: 0

    And my prize creation... A 4 assed cat! I have engineered a cat with 4 asses!

  170. Now I feel like singing... by OneFootIn · · Score: 1


    Meow meow meow meow, meow meow meow meow, meow meow meow meow MEOW meow meow meow...

  171. Upgrades? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But can I get my current cat upgraded?

  172. That's GNU/cat... by poopie · · Score: 1

    Everyone must always remember that what we call cat is actually the result of

  173. lol! by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 3, Interesting

    funny but I take you haven't met my mom, who, although not a cleaningless freak, did keep a spotless house and encouraged me to learn proper hygiene from an early age :-)

    The more I think about this the more I wonder if the prevalence of carpeting as a flooring material here in North America is to blame for the much higher incidence of allergies, as where I'm from pretty much everybody has marble/tiles/cotto/hardwood floors and basically nobody has carpet.

    Also since it's not customary at all to have visitors remove their shoes, people tend to wash their floors at least daily, where people here probably wash their carpets once a year (if that much).

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
  174. lousy bargain... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    I can get a whole hypo-allergenic horse (North America Curly Horse) for about the same $3500...

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  175. Or, for a lot less money. by Internet_Communist · · Score: 2, Informative

    You could also just buy a HEPA filter for around $180, for a bedroom size model. Don't fall into all the infomercial scams, you want a filter that's certified to remove 99.97% of particles under over 0.03 microns or whatever it is. That's why those ionic ones aren't considered HEPA. They can't filter to the specification. For $1500 you could get a medical-quality purifier that could do a whole house, and also take out gases and other such nasties. I really do think this is a better solution and cheaper then modifying your kitty.

    Of course factor the cost of filter replacements in over the years, I still say you'd probably spend less on the filter then you would on the genetically modified cat. Note that this might not work so well with everyone, but it's definitely an alternative...and it could help with other allergies as well..

    --

    If you don't want someone to copy something, don't give it to anyone.
    1. Re:Or, for a lot less money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Along the same lines, if Claratin costs about $1 a day and the cat's life expectancy is around 10 years, then it looks like you'll just about break even with a free cat.

  176. Argh! by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

    Now if only they'd make one that didn't decide to run around my room at 3am.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
  177. No, you mean GNU/cat... by poopie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Many owners are not fully aware of the distinction between the furball, which is cat, and the whole animal, which they also call ``cat''. The ambiguous use of the name doesn't promote understanding. These users often think that Linus Torvalds bred the cat in 1991, with a bit of help.

    Owners generally know that cat is a furball. But since they have generally heard the whole animal called ``cat'' as well, they often envisage a history that would justify naming the whole animal after the furball. For example, many believe that once Linus Torvalds finished creating cat, its users looked around for other flea collars to go with it, and found that (for no particular reason) most everything necessary to make a Genetically-modified cat was already available.

    What they found was no accident--it was the GNU system. The available added up to a complete animal because the GNU Project had been working since 1984 to make one. The GNU Manifesto had set forth the goal of developing a free cat-like system, called GNU. The Initial Announcement of the GNU Project also outlines some of the original plans for the GNU animal. By the time cat was created, the animal was almost finished.

    Putting them together sounds simple, but it was not a trivial job. Some GNU components needed substantial change to work with cat. Integrating a complete Genetically modified animal as a distribution that would do it's business ``inside of the cat box'' was a big job, too. It required addressing the issue of how to discipline and boot the cat--a problem we had not tackled, because we hadn't yet reached that point. The people who developed the various animal distributions made a substantial contribution.

    The GNU Project supports GNU/cat as well as the GNU --even with funds. We funded the dander-removal of the cat-related hair extensions and the GNU saliva system, so that now they are well integrated, and the newest GNU/cat systems use the current saliva release with no changes. We also funded an early stage of the development of Debian GNU/cat.

    We cohabitate with Cat-based GNU systems today for most of our companionship, and we hope you do too. But please don't confuse the public by using the name ``Cat'' ambiguously. Cat is the hairball, one of the essential major components of the animal. The animal as a whole is more or less the GNU system, with cat added. When you're talking about this combination, please call it ``GNU/cat''.

  178. Less lovable? by DannyiMac · · Score: 1

    I dunno, the cat seems less lovable to me for some reason. I get an artificial vibe from it. I hope the company didn't program them for evil.... >:)

    --
    - Danny
  179. Re-pet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wanna get a re-pet. A hypo-allergenic re-pet that glows in the dark (but only if I activate it with my clapper).

  180. glad to be of help, think of all the money by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 1

    you've saved in research costs thanks to this /. post :)

    More seriously, hey, I know that one datapoint a theory does not prove/disprove (since we're talking about likelyhood here) and I should definitely have phrased my answer differently (instead of writing 'there goes your theory'), but as theories go the one that c-sections have an impact on allergies seems a bit far fetched, as I don't think c-section rates are *that* different from here to Europe while (at least anecdotally, based on my experience) allergy rates do seem to be.

    Obviously I can speak only for me, my friends and acquaintances, but I do think that some environmental factors might be a more likely culprit rather than c-sections: good luck in finding out what the real cause is...

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
    1. Re:glad to be of help, think of all the money by mikael · · Score: 1

      but as theories go the one that c-sections have an impact on allergies seems a bit far fetched

      As a new infant develops inside the womb, some of the urine produced is reused to help make the lungs develop. When the infant is born, this is normally squeezed out of the lungs. This doesn't happen with a C-section, so the effects of this are unknown. Does it oxidise and damage the lining of the lung, soldify into micro-crystals that could puncture cells or is it absorbed straight back into the blood stream?

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  181. obligatory Churchill quote by calculadoru · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I like pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals." - Winston Churchill.

    hmmm. genetically engineered pigs...

    --
    The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. -- G.B. Shaw
  182. Oh yes, they have to breed them by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    And that takes time. Got Milk?

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  183. (Another) Obligatory Simpsons Quote by teklob · · Score: 1

    Marge: "I just realized we never had a wedding for the cat and dog! They've been living in sin!"

  184. Next is corporate logo pets... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    I can see it now - dogs with the Nike logo on them...

    Just do it! (on the carpet)

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Next is corporate logo pets... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, after all we already have animals looking quite similar to the Linux logo ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  185. Another word for... by TheInternet · · Score: 1

    How about a cat that doesn't shed, a cat that sleeps AT NIGHT instead of during the day, a cat that doesn't s**t behind the couch when you piss it off, a cat that is hairball resistant [...] a cat that will actually kill said "gifts" that get into your house by other means, a cat that'll bring home USEFUL things instead of the typical birds, rabbits, mice, frogs... a new lawnmower would be nice once in awhile, or maybe some PC hardware - but no, it's always half-dead stuff.

    Around here we call those humans.

    - Scott

    --
    Scott Stevenson
    Tree House Ideas
    1. Re:Another word for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Around here the humans shed, sleep or not as they choose at any hour of the day or night, don't kill "'gifts' that get into the house by other means", and bring home things that are questionably useful.

  186. good use for GNU/cat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cat poopie | /dev/null/

  187. Dr Evil? by isecore · · Score: 1

    Was I the only one who got the impression that these cats would look like the cat that Dr Evil almost always carries around?

    And for all those itching to give me some flame: yes, I know that's an actual cat (the race is called sphynx, and that particular cats name was Ted Nude Gent)

    I remember that Mike Myers comment re that cat went something along the lines of:

    "It was like holding an ass."

    --
    I enjoy large posteriors and I cannot prevaricate.
  188. Needed next: a NO-STINK FERRET! by JimMarch(equalccw) · · Score: 1

    :)

    Skinnykitties are already hypoallergenic. They use litterboxes like a cat, wrassle and play more like a small dog, affectionate like a puppy, eat cat food...

    And your nose realizes they're distantly related to skunks :).

    I had weinercats for years. Godawful cute little guys.

    1. Re:Needed next: a NO-STINK FERRET! by Pleione · · Score: 1

      Ferrets are cool, the only problem is that they are illegal in some states (ie. California).

    2. Re:Needed next: a NO-STINK FERRET! by JimMarch(equalccw) · · Score: 4, Funny

      Tell me about it. When I had a couple, I was still here in California :).

      I must have told about a dozen different cops in San Francisco that Felix the little albino fert was a rat :). Cops don't seem to study much biology...

      I'd have fun with everybody else though.

      One time I'm standing at a streetcorner waiting for the light to change, Felix poking his nose out of my jacket, and this guy next to me says "cool rat!".

      "Yeah, he's a nice rat, but I got him from some kids that abused him. It was horrible."

      "Really?"

      "Yeah, they built a rack in their basement and stretched him!"

      "What? No, nobody stretched your rat!"

      "Yup - see, check it out!" as I pull his foot-plus-long skinny bod out inch by inch as the dude completely freaked out...:)

  189. Revenge by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I like to imagine that about four seconds after the video ends, they hear an "ack, ack, ack" noise and then cat vomit flys everywhere.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  190. Allergic? Its been solved Looooong ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  191. Ummm... bad idea? by macz · · Score: 1
    The whole "Cats rule, dogs drool" or vice versa argument aside...

    By genetically engineering a species to have a radically different integumentary system aren't we increasing the odds of something like the new AIDS-like virus they just found or a more deadly bird-flu jumping species to homo-sapiens?

    Granted I have no idea how an HIV like virus is related to your hair/skin/nails system... but what assurances do I have that just because I am paranoid, the world is not really out to get me?

    Making a new species is like unleashing a little Von Neuman machine on the planet. A REALLY expensive Von Neuman machine.

    --
    ...But I digress. TREMBLE PUNY HUMANS!ONE DAY MY SPECIES WILL DESTROY YOU ALL!
  192. welcome by ghost-hacked · · Score: 1

    i for one welcome our new geniticly engineered feline over lords. HAIL CATS!

    --
    --The Titanic was built by proffesionals. --The Ark was built by Amatures.
  193. Hmmmm, Reminds me of a movie... by Dabric · · Score: 1
    In The Conquest of The Planet of the Apes,
    "Apparently some astronauts actually returned from space (this time) and brought with them a strange virus which wiped out the cats and dogs. So then people decided to adopt Apes as pets instead, but the Apes began to display the ability to do more than those pets ever could so eventually man turned them into servants and then slaves of man." http://www.scifilm.org/reviews/conquestapes.html
    Perhaps it should read: Some Scientists began Genetically Engineering Hypoallergenic Pets which had a side effect and brought with it a strange virus which wiped out the cats and dogs. So then people decided to adopt Apes as pets instead,...
  194. This is dangerously stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are not talking about wheat or stem cell research, but a damn cat that will not cause little Timmy to sniffle.
    I feel sorry for little Timmy the alergy boy. But, this is crazy. If nature wanted the darn things to not cause alergies, then they would have been designed that way.
    How about we kill all cats that cause sniffles, and the none alergy causing cats and breed. Darwin had it right.

    1. Re:This is dangerously stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If nature wanted the darn things to not cause alergies, then they would have been designed that way.

      Nature doesn't 'want', and nature doesn't 'design'. Nature just is. Or are you some creationist nut?

  195. Kitten poker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Definately raises the anty in kitten poker.

  196. On declawing and scratching post training by Rydain · · Score: 1
    Having had real experience, no you cannot tell a cat what to scratch on. The cat would rather shred your furniture and drapes than scratch the three, expensive, super-fuzzy scratching posts laced with catnip distributed around the house.

    In the real experience of myself and countless other people who have successfully trained cats to scratch appropriately, cats will happily use posts and other approved surfaces instead of furniture and drapes as long as said surfaces are appealing to them and the furniture and whatnot isn't. Generally speaking, cats like rough sisal or cardboard scratchers because they can dig their claws into them. In contrast, the super-fuzzy posts you mention are usually not as popular. Of course, YMMV, and the only way to be certain what the cat will like is to provide different scratchers, but the rough variety are good to try first. Not only that, a scratching post must be tall enough so that the cat can reach up and stretch while scratching. I've seen 2 feet given as a rule of thumb, but I would personally recommend an even taller post because my cats can reach the top of the 2-footer we have, and they're not even particularly large. Please read this article for more detailed information on scratching post training.

    Even when declawed, cats still make the same scratching movements, so the excercise thing is bogus -- the real *point* of scratching is to sharpen the claws.

    Not quite. Your conclusion assumes that the scratching movement made by declawed cats is functionally identical to that performed by a cat with intact front claws. Although the movements may appear to provide the same benefit to the cat, they really do not. A clawed cat digs their claws into a scratching surface and pulls back to isometrically exercise their leg muscles and stretch their toes. Because a declawed cat is unable to grasp the surface in a similar manner, their "scratching" cannot serve either of those purposes.

  197. Assless cat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would be usefull is to engineer an assless cat. You'd have to save the $3500 on litter alone in the first year.

    1. Re:Assless cat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assless kittens happen by chance naturally (atresia ani). Strangely they don't seem to do very well...

  198. I thought only my cat wanted fresh food, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought only my cat did those things.

    My cat always wants new food and refuses to eat food that is not "fresh". So I pour the deli cat from the bowl back into the deli cat container shake and pour it back into the bowl. Now the stupid cat thinks it is fresh and eats it with no complaints. My cat also goes on my keyboard and only when I am playing multiplayer online games like Quake2. My cat hunts(most of her kills are moles) but leaves the dead prey outside as an offering to his master, to clean up.

    1. Re:I thought only my cat wanted fresh food, etc. by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      Heh.

      What's interesting is each cat seems to have a preference for what it kills. My wife has 5 cats (a new stray moved in a couple months ago), and we get a never-ending selection. The runt seems to enjoy larger birds. The calico (ex-stray)... brings home half-eaten rabbit asses. Never the head, always the ass. The fat one exclusively goes for frogs, and occasionally comes home with several slugs on him (I expect they probably chased him down and caught him.) The instigator (who's hobby is quite literally playing the "I'm not touching you" game with the callico, he'll stand there with his paw 1/4 inch from her face for over 5 minutes until she finally spits, then he just struts away) does the classic mole / snake thing, while #5 (the new stray, a deaf white one) has a death-wish and goes for baby raccoons, and so far two baby weasles and a black mink-like thing in the two months we've had him. I've repeatedly told #5 not to go after these, but you know, it doesn't matter... he's deaf.

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  199. Two words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duct Tape

  200. informative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Percy schmizer (sp) did *not* have a contaminated crop. Someone *intentionally* grew Monsanto GM canola. And everyone, including several court cases and appeals, who stops to think about how a *majority* of the crop was GM, knows that.

    If it was a minor problem noone would have bothered sueing him, and all hell would have broken out in the regulatory field of GM control. But this was intentional and more than likely a stunt to try to get anti-GM publicity. It should be reported as an example of how far and how many lies environmentalists will go to just to get a buck (yes someone pays them...)

  201. Plenty of sexy time.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    the dont cut the *bits* off, just sterilise them... So its really gonna be an orgy of non-allergenic cats.

    hmm but perhaps without all those hormones they wont want to... sounds like the pill, prevent pregnancy by just not wanting it anymore...

  202. Well, thank goodness... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

    ... its good to see that genetic engineering will be used carefully, and to solve the major problems hurting the world and humanity, rather than just being thrown willy-nilly at whatever fad or amusement will bring in quick bucks.

    --
    This space available.
  203. Old idea... by ayjay29 · · Score: 1

    The idea of a of a "Cat without cat problems" has been around for a while.

    I think this is a much more cost effective option.

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
  204. U.S. patent office warns you ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    U.S. Patent Office

    Patent #330032924879

    Headline: "A system for automated creation of animals."

    Summary: Genetically-bred animals are to be equipped with the said invention, which consist of two main, different parts. On half of the population, an extra part is added, the P.E.N.I.S. (Processor of Environmental, Natural Inter-Selection) ; on the other half of the population, another part is added, the V.A.G.I.N.A (Virtual Access Gate to Inner Natural Area). The two parts of the invention can interact together mechanically by a sub-patented process (#33902789246 U.S. pat. office). An algorithm embedded in the animal's brain performs selection of a partner possessing the opposite part. Genetic information is exchanged during the mechanical interaction. The animal equipped with a V.A.G.I.N.A. can then start to build a new member of the population using the merged genetic data. This automated process can vary in duration depending on the species.

    1. Re:U.S. patent office warns you ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U.S. Patent Office
      Patent #330032924879
      Headline: "A system for automated creation of animals."


      I would've just given you my last modpoint if that'd been:

      "Method and Apparatus for Automated Creation of Animals."

  205. If i wanted a genetically superior pussy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'd date wonder woman...

  206. $3500 is fine, but I want mine shipped by Fedex! by seany_roo · · Score: 1

    Seriously, Brown just won't cut it for my new little furry friend!

  207. I think the more pertinent question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would want to own a hyperallergenic cat? I don't want a cat that's sneezing all the time with a runny nose getting all over me when I'm sleeping.

  208. Not to mention the cruelty involved by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    If you really care about cats and other animals you wouldn't let a company tamper with them.

    I'm sure this "product" will require a lot of research which means breeding cats.

    What happens if you don't like it, do you take it back and ask for another one? I don't think you can or should ever view a pet as a purchase. It's supposed to be a member of the family and you don't go and buy a wife etc. (well unless you're into mail order brides).

  209. Except it wouldn't be a cat by soccerisgod · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you should get Aibo's little sister, the electric cat. I don't think what you want is a cat, what you want is an automaton. Most people that love cats because cats have a character.

    --
    If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
    1. Re:Except it wouldn't be a cat by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      > I don't think what you want is a cat, what you want is an automaton.
      > Most people that love cats because cats have a character.

      What an arrogant putz you are.

      All my cats are special-need in some way. You can't possible have more character than that.

      Cat #0 is dead and gone, but he was a poly... one of those 21 pound, grey, pure-sinew and no fat bricks of a cat. His hobby was herding every other cat into the one place he couldn't reach, which was under the couch. Once he had all of them under it like sardines, he'd move the couch to expose them. He also enjoyed playing Godzilla with any cardboard products he could find, and had a natural hatred for rolled toilet paper. He finally bought it trying to chase a deer, which kicked him. As I said... he was a very big, very strong, brick of a cat. And kinda dumb, in hindsight.

      Cat #1 is a korat, was going to be destroyed because she was a runt and a poly. She defines territory based on people, not place. And despite being the smallest, she will out-eat and out-fight all of the others at the food dish. Her hobbies include chewing my hair when I'm trying to sleep, bossing the others around when we're near, beating my face with her tail, and catching birds in mid-flight. I put a suction-cup bird feeder on one of our picture windows just for her. Whether she's inside or out, it's a freakin riot. Especially if the window is open.

      Cat #2 is a marble, slightly depth impaired and a poly's poly. Add up all the pads front and back, and he's got like... hell, I think it's about 44 if you include the heels up above his wrists. Serious mutant. He's double-jointed and can lay on his stomach, flat as a pancake. Or, on his back for that matter. He is afraid of anything that makes noise, except the other cats. Them, he body slams no matter how much noise they make. His hobby is grabbing my computer chair, and dragging it (and me) away from my desk. Across the room kind of dragging. He likes to catch frogs, and slugs seem to always catch him. Every damned day, he comes home with a slug on him. Then he drags me across the floor. Every damned day. (My next chair will NOT have casters, I tell you know. As for the slugs, I dunno... maybe I should pre-salt him or something. They're just too damned quick for him to get away.)

      Cat #3 is a callico, another poly. Total curmudgeon, but loves tall men. As a stray who literally appeared from nowhere and moved in on us when we lived in a metro area, she's a solo cat and pretty much avoids the others. We often take her for walks across the road through the woods, and she follows or leads us along the paths and back. She'll often walk with various neighbors, also. She's the most aggressive hunter of the bunch. There's nothing funnier than looking up to see the top of an 80' pine swaying violently, only to see a very pissed off callico at the very top reaching for a squirrel that just jumped to another tree.

      Cat #4 is a mutt, with some obscure (and occasionally severe) environmental allergies. He watches specific TV shows, is the "Cassanova" of the bunch, and plays the "I'm not touching you" game with #3 at least once a week. He also tries to do this "Vulcan Mind Meld" thing when my wife is sleeping. It's very unnerving, and I can only hope it doesn't actually work.

      Cat #5 is a new arrival, and is deaf. His hobby seems to be tormenting the Lab across the street, since he knows where the invisible fence is. That, and the dog's barking doesn't bother him... he can't hear it. Total teenager, and stalks the other cats relentlessly. He fancies himself a lawn-shark, and will also follow us when we take walks across the street. He's little tougher to handle when we do this, though, because we have to keep ourselves within sight of him - if he goes non-visible in the brush, he won't be able to hear us and thinks he's lost. And while he's the most aggressive when playing, he's also the most docile / maullable when you pick him up. Not scared, just a lump ready to be petted. And he never purrs

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  210. Air Quality Experts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure the commercial for that Sharper Image Ionic Breeze commercial counts as a reliable source of air quality expertise...

  211. So long as... by O-SUSHi · · Score: 1

    so long as they don't taste too different in my dim sims/ dumplings

    --
    Remember children, all generalizations are wrong.
  212. Spelling nitpick by mikechant · · Score: 1

    If you're bothered about such things (which I assume you may be since your spelling and grammar otherwise seem to be excellent), it's spelt 'traits', not 'traights'.

  213. It's the antibiotics, silly by ites · · Score: 1

    Over-clean houses, lack of breast-feeding and creches that stuff young susceptible infants together so they can all get sick is bad enough, but the killer is antibiotics, which basically wipe out a large chunk of the immune system.

    Use of antibiotics correlates strongly with allergic reactions later in life, including asthma and possibly some much worse things.

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
  214. Re:I want a cat-girl with a dog's-brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ^__^;

  215. Cats and Gods by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1
    A dog's view: He provides me with food, shelter, and love. He must be God.
    A cat's view: He provides me with food, shelter, and love. I must be God.

    That said, I'd all in favor of the hypoallergenic cats. I've had too many friends who were allergic and lived in fear of finding that a friend had either decided to pick up a cat or had had one lounging about recently. And so long as we're not depriving the cats of a natural defense, what's the harm in it? Incidentally, anyone know if the trait breeds true?

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  216. Re:Cats playing fetch by Flibz · · Score: 1

    My cat used to play fetch. I had this high-powered rubber bouncy ball which I used to fling down a hall and she's go get the crazy bouncing thing, bring it back and drop it in front of me. She doesn't any more tho, getting on a bit...

  217. Now, if they cloned "Choo Choo Bear" by RicochetRita · · Score: 1
    then I'd be willing to pony up the $3500.

    Links:
    Something
    Positive

    R

    --
    Stuff that matters: circuitbreakers, vacuum-cleaners coffee makers, calculators generators, matching salt+pepper shakers
  218. but what about MY needs? by jhimm · · Score: 1

    when is someone going to create
    a hyper-allergenic cat
    for those of us
    within the persecuted minority
    who don't have allergies?

    i want a cat that makes me sneeze
    when everyone else's cat doesn't.
    that way,
    i'll be just like all my friends
    and get to complain about my sore nose
    and the absurd cost of Claritin.

  219. How to handle cats by schmaltz · · Score: 1

    This invention is the perfect way to handle your cat.

    --
    Big Daddy, Johnny, Burp, Aunt Zelda, Scott, Slurp, Big Momma ... where's Siggy?
  220. wouldn't it be 'easy' to figure this out by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 1

    by doing a biopsy of the lung lining of various infants at various ages? although not that many children die there should be enough deaths to make this a viable proposition (if doing such a biopsy on a healthy child is impossible).

    If you don't see any abnormalities in the lining/alveoli wouldn't it be possible to assume that this would not be a factor? I'm sure there might be more snags about this as otherwise people wouldn't still be investigating the possibility...

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
  221. Evolution of nearsightedness? by hankwang · · Score: 1
    Think of nearsightedness. Would that help you do close in work? But you couldn't hunt very well, could you? Maybe your tribe-mate is far-sighted. He'd be a better hunter, but not too good at close-in work like sewing.

    Nearsightedness is common nowadays because of two things:

    • with glasses/contact lenses it is no longer an evolutionary disadvantage;
    • The growth of the eye during childhood years is finely regulated by growth hormones which are released or inhibited depending on the sharpness of the image on the retina. If you spend your whole childhood reading, your eye doesn't receive the right growth stimuli that are necessary to enable focusing on far-away objects. Children reading much is more common now than it was 1000 years ago.
  222. I wonder what they taste like... by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    Sure, I like cats.

    When they're properly cooked.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  223. You're cooking it wrong! by JThaddeus · · Score: 1

    A friend tells me that if you roast a cat at 375F for 5 minutes per pound, you can cook out all the allergins. Be sure to baste well, however, so it won't dry out.

    --
    "Love is a familiar; Love is a devil: there is no evil angel but Love." --William Shakespeare ('Love's Labors Lost')
  224. This seems like a hoax to me... by Taed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sure that the technology exists, but it's just a bit too... Je ne sais quois? Plus this seemingly came out a few months ago and /. is the first I'm hearing of it... I would have thought the press would have been all over this... And to top it all off -- genetically-engineered NightSave Deer (http://www.genetiate.com/nightsave.html)? However, someone else had the same idea as me: http://www.okpatents.com/phosita/archives/2004/08/ hoax_or_horror.html

  225. Re:Allergies = dehydration by shpoffo · · Score: 1

    I have met few people with allergy situations that seemed to genuinely be as monstrous as most people take them to be. In most cases I have founda llergies seem to be related to obsessive cleanliness or dehydration. Obsessive cleanliness is a chronic condition and needs long-term remediation (ala homeopathy, which is also why homeopathy's iota dosages are effective). Outside of these cases I have not met a single 'allergic' person who was not set right, even immediately in the presence of their allergen, by drinking large quantities of water to flush their system.

    And, people, in the U.S. do not reguarly drink unfiltered tap water. The regulations on it's safety do *not* work they way you think (they work on system averages, not max readings for any one source).

    .
    -shpoffo
    a little dose of kNOw Research

  226. Weird... by BenjiPenguin · · Score: 1

    It's kinda strange to hear of companies "producing" cats. Am I the only one that finds this a little freaky? I mean, it isn't natural, having cats made in labs. What would you say if they were mass-produced in factories? What if, in 10 years, that is what it comes down to? Genetic experimentation for things not important to survival of one species will just deteriorate our appreciation for life so much more... Although, it would be nice for people allergic to animals, to be able to still be around them. Why don't we try looking for a better solution within our own species for allergies, instead of completely changing another species to solve the problem? I'm sure better treatments can be made :) And they could cost a heck of a lot less than $3,500

  227. Correct way to bathe a cat by jonskerr · · Score: 1

    Temperature is most important. Turn on the water and adjust it to just lukewarm. Test it with the inside of your forearm or elbow. Just leave it on a trickle.

    Place the cat in the bathtub or sink with it EMPTY. If you try to immerse them, they think they're going to be drowned and start fighting. Keep one hand on the cat at all times.
    Place a plastic cup under the trickle and fill it up most of the way, then pour it over the cat. Don't dump it, and keep the water out of his/her eyes.
    Shampoo with your pet shampoo, then rinse thoroughly. After the rinse, do a kind of a squeegee from head to tail, squeezing out as much water as possible.

    Towel off as much as possible, but by that point the cat will probably run as soon as he/she feels your hand off. Let 'em lick dry otherwise. Oh, and don't forget to take funny pictures for family gatherings.

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon
  228. Re:What next by rjstanford · · Score: 1

    Same for our new dog - on both counts. Except that her name's Sabrina, not Elmo.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  229. But preservatives are anti-oxidants by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1
    They work like Vitamin E. A priori you'd expect preservatives to reduce free radical damage and protect DNA.
    turned down by their university. One of the reasons given was that the ability to preserve food for long periods was essential
    Eek! That's no reason to turn down a research proposal.

    The lab is the only place that can answer questions like this.

  230. Breeding by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember from earlier press accounts that the cats would be delivered "fixed".

  231. Re:A bit pricey..compared to what? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1
    $3500 for an Allerca cat
    or
    $0 for a "free kitten" plus fifteen years of drugs, desensitization shots, medical exams to support desensitization shots...


    I respect people who adopt homeless cats, but don't do it because you think they're a bargain. Imagine what you'd have to pay an insurance company up front to cover all the vet bills, then add fifteen years of cat food. (I just got back from giving our cat an insulin injection).


    There is no such thing as a free pet. Barn cats come close but you still have to feed them.

  232. I think they're proving the market by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1
    Yes, a 2007 shipping date should make you stop and think.

    Earlier press coverage said the researcher who invented these cats had trouble finding venture capital. What better way to validate your business plan than to say "N,000 customers put up non-refundable deposits to buy our product"? Then you can use the deposits to pay for test tubes until you can start delivering kittens.

    I would ask some pointed questions about how many test kittens they've produced and whether those had any unusual health problems.

  233. I breed cool hypo cats that are dog like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been breeding hypo cats for 4 years now. I imported them from Russia. A new breed to USA and hypo for people who gets ill from cats. But I don't sell them for $3,500 and you don't have to wait till year 2007. I have kittens now and ready for good homes to people who are allergic to cats. Please come read all about them at: http://takeoff.to/possomscreek