Generally, none of the people participating in any "draw Mohammed day" are forbidden from doing so. Thus, they are not actually doing anything to promote any kind of freedom.
What they are doing is acting like brats and angering a lot of people. That is not a productive way to spread your views, it will just cause people to backlash.
You can use the camera in absolutely any way you want. There are no restrictions whatsoever on that.
What you can't do is distribute video commercially in large amounts in h.264, without a license. This is entirely unrelated to how that video was created.
I think Intel would find it easier to get people excited about this technology if they actually used it to render something that looked interesting, or at the very least looked good at all.
Cesium is one of the most problematic ones, because it has a half-life that is long enough that it will stay around and remain a problem, but short enough that it is still very radioactive. It is also problematic because it is taken up and concentrated by biological processes.
Iodine is a great concern in the immediate aftermath of the disaster, but its short half-life means it disappears quickly and is not a problem in the long term.
Uranium is not much of a problem in general. Plutonium is pretty bad, but neither of the two are usually spread very far.
No, not really. You can get a very superficial understanding of what is going on without any maths, but you are just fooling yourself if you think that understanding is anything remotely like what you understand once you've actually worked with the maths.
Actually, Google wants to introduce LLVM bytecode, which will run on both x86 and ARM. They're making an OS for ARM processors, you know, they are aware it exists.
Slashdot Mirror
1. Go into a town with black people, start calling them niggers.
2. Get beat up.
3. Show the world that you can't have niggers in this goddamn country because they are violent and brutal, so we have to throw them out.
As others pointed out, you need more than the words "no true..." for it to be a No True Scotsman fallacy.
Can you actually explain where the fallacy is, rather than just namedrop it?
No, I am saying that people get angry at you when you insult their values and beliefs.
Um, I've got some news for you...
Generally, none of the people participating in any "draw Mohammed day" are forbidden from doing so. Thus, they are not actually doing anything to promote any kind of freedom.
What they are doing is acting like brats and angering a lot of people. That is not a productive way to spread your views, it will just cause people to backlash.
Well, why don't you point out the part of his argument that is fallacious?
Any camera allows you to do that. You just have to re-encode into a format that does not require licensing fees to distribute first.
Nobody ever distributes the direct output from a camera commercially. You pretty much always edit and re-encode, so this is a total non-issue.
You can use the camera in absolutely any way you want. There are no restrictions whatsoever on that.
What you can't do is distribute video commercially in large amounts in h.264, without a license. This is entirely unrelated to how that video was created.
How are you avoiding it? By downloading DivX files? Those are just as patented. They're just used illegally.
I assume you don't buy any DVDs, either.
FP=Fnineteenth Post.
Wooing them by showing them graphics that look worse than pretty much everything else on offer? How is that supposed to work out for them?
I think Intel would find it easier to get people excited about this technology if they actually used it to render something that looked interesting, or at the very least looked good at all.
Nope, that's business as usual.
h.264 is patented, but it is by no means "shit".
Oh, what did he do in the past?
Say other positive things about Microsoft?
And do you know what kind of things they do, then?
Things like http://developers.slashdot.org/story/11/08/30/0627206/Microsoft-Wants-Your-Feedback-On-Its-New-Python-IDE .
And do you know what Slashdotters do in return?
Act like children.
So? The relevant statistic, deaths per terawatt hour, was given.
Cesium is one of the most problematic ones, because it has a half-life that is long enough that it will stay around and remain a problem, but short enough that it is still very radioactive. It is also problematic because it is taken up and concentrated by biological processes.
Iodine is a great concern in the immediate aftermath of the disaster, but its short half-life means it disappears quickly and is not a problem in the long term.
Uranium is not much of a problem in general. Plutonium is pretty bad, but neither of the two are usually spread very far.
Most of the Fukushima fallout went straight out to sea where the population density is usually around zero.
From two hundred yards away? That's some arm on that kid.
How do you "submit" a databse?
It turns out that if you read sentences all the way to the end, they become a lot more clear.
I know they are incompetent of fraudulent enough to issue a certificate for *.google.com. What more do you need to know?
No, not really. You can get a very superficial understanding of what is going on without any maths, but you are just fooling yourself if you think that understanding is anything remotely like what you understand once you've actually worked with the maths.
I'm sure there are other people who also have not made the tiniest effort to read up on the security mechanisms of NaCl, and think the same as you.
Actually, Google wants to introduce LLVM bytecode, which will run on both x86 and ARM. They're making an OS for ARM processors, you know, they are aware it exists.
x86 is just the first step on the way.