Slashdot Mirror


User: Joce640k

Joce640k's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
11,688
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 11,688

  1. Re:Old tech: xerox machine on Ask Slashdot: How To Back Up Physical Data? · · Score: 1

    Periodic copying, on a copier/xerox, of the contents of your wallet works well. Make sure you copy both sides of credit cards and such, as they have numbers to call for cancellation or replacement. You could even simply scan the contents, then encrypt and store it somewhere.

    What is this "copier/xerox/scanner" you speak of? Are you also going to telefax the copy you made to the secure location?

    The correct method is to place the document on a wooden table and photograph it with your cellphone.

  2. Re:Probably saved more lives with jamming on FCC Proposes $48,000 Fine To Man Jamming Cellphones On Florida Interstate · · Score: 1

    The thing is, the phone didn't cause this, accident rates have not significantly gone up....these people were always out there...they were just less identifiable.

    So now we have an easy way to identify them?

    Time to put their insurance premiums through the roof.

  3. Re:Isn't parody protected in the US? on Peoria Mayor Sends Police To Track Down Twitter Parodist · · Score: 1

    Newsflash: it turns out that rules written on pieces of paper don't actually stop the police from arresting you for parody.

    ...especially when the person you're parodying is a self-important asshole who happens to have the chief of police in his pocket.

  4. Re:Isn't parody protected in the US? on Peoria Mayor Sends Police To Track Down Twitter Parodist · · Score: 1

    No doubt this "revolution" will be organized on Facebook

    (and the police will be waiting with tanks when they arrive to take over the mayors office... Internet surveillance, bitches!)

  5. Re:Isn't parody protected in the US? on Peoria Mayor Sends Police To Track Down Twitter Parodist · · Score: 1

    The image I have in my head right now is Boss Hogg with a big cigar is his hand shouting at some policemen to "do something".

  6. Re:Commodore Amiga 3000T on Ask Slashdot: What Tech Products Were Built To Last? · · Score: 1

    Have they attached the inductor any better since his video? Enquiring minds...

    He did eventually fix it up and it still works. It appears in some later videos, eg. this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    PS: I scored one of those on eBay after I watched that. Cost me $80 but still a pretty good buy. It still has the "US Army" sticker on it complete with last calibration date (Feb 2011). There's not a mark on either the meter or the carrying case and the probes were brand new in plastic bag. I reckon it never left stores... "beauty!"

  7. Re:Casio F-91W on Ask Slashdot: What Tech Products Were Built To Last? · · Score: 1

    There's people in Guantanamo whose only crime is to wear one of those: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  8. Re:Commodore Amiga 3000T on Ask Slashdot: What Tech Products Were Built To Last? · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Fluke multimeters...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  9. Re:Atari 800 on Ask Slashdot: What Tech Products Were Built To Last? · · Score: 1

    "Hardest working"?

  10. Re:wonder bout... on MIT Designs Tsunami Proof Floating Nuclear Reactor · · Score: 1

    I think the point is that off-shore platforms don't sink when the weather changes, tsunami or not.

    Neither do the onshore ones...

  11. Re:wonder bout... on MIT Designs Tsunami Proof Floating Nuclear Reactor · · Score: 2

    Rouge waves, typhoons, collisions with tankers, vulnerability to warships, aircraft, submarines.

    But hey. It's cool that a tsunami won't screw it up.

    Wouldn't it be better on the sea bed? Also tsunami-proof...but also rogue-wave, aircraft and tanker proof.

    Even better. Don't build any more reactors than can go into meltdown.

  12. Re:Good. on RCMP Arrest Canadian Teen For Heartbleed Exploit · · Score: 1

    You COULD prevent millions of people from being able to do their job, ... or ... just turn off the heartbeat feature.

    (And set up a honeypot it its place to catch the bad people)

  13. Re:Yay for government!!! on Industry-Wide Smartphone "Kill Switch" Closer To Reality · · Score: 1

    The carriers already can (and do) block stolen phones. Each phone has a unique IMEI number, in addition to the SIM card number.

    IMEI can be changed. It's usually just a file on a special partition.

  14. Re:Nonsense on Ask Slashdot: System Administrator Vs Change Advisory Board · · Score: 0

    They want bureaucracy, they make the paperwork. Tell them to track windows and distro security pages, the changes are there.

    Yep. They're the "experts". Just tell them the Microsoft KB number, that's all the information they need.

  15. Re:most lego's are a rip off on Kids Can Swipe a Screen But Can't Use LEGOs · · Score: 1

    We are talking about little kids. You tend to get them the Big Blocks instead.

    In what universe?

    For the last two years every toddler-owner I meet is incredibly proud that their 2-year old knows how to swipe (and they keep reminding everybody in sight).

    "Oh, you should see him use the iPhone!".

  16. Re:Relevant Skills on Kids Can Swipe a Screen But Can't Use LEGOs · · Score: 1

    Having skill at playing with building blocks is not useful to most modern jobs. I'm sure the children are not great at milking cows either.

    Either of those would make you stand out in a job interview alongside a bunch of people who only know how to swipe.

  17. Re:ob Henry Ford on Nokia Had a Production-Ready Web Tablet 13 Years Ago · · Score: 1

    Then there's the customer surveys that ask people if they'd like to see more salads and healthy foods in McDonalds.

    Of course they'd like to SEE it...but that's not why they go to McDonalds.

  18. Re:Subtle attack against C/C++ on The Security of Popular Programming Languages · · Score: 1

    I remember a saying when I was learning programming;-

    With C it is easy to shoot yourself in the foot, with C++ it is a lot harder, but when you do shoot yourself in the foot you take your entire leg off.

    Pity you never bothered to find out who said it or in what context...

  19. Re:Subtle attack against C/C++ on The Security of Popular Programming Languages · · Score: 1

    I think 1996 just called and wants it's Usenet flamewar back.

  20. Re:Subtle attack against C/C++ on The Security of Popular Programming Languages · · Score: 2

    UTF8 is great for storing data in files, but ... working with strings in memory? Insanity will follow.

  21. Re:Subtle attack against C/C++ on The Security of Popular Programming Languages · · Score: -1, Troll

    The problem lies squarely with C.

    If they'd used C++ instead of C, heartbleed would never have happened - std::containers don't need to store their size as a separate variable.

    Luckily for us, the people responsible for maintaining the Linux Kernel understand the difference between C and C++ and their software isn't full of manual memory management and arguments over which version of malloc()/free() to use. Oh, wait...

  22. Re:It was a "joke" back then on This 1981 BYTE Magazine Cover Explains Why We're So Bad At Tech Predictions · · Score: 1

    Most authors back in Asimov's day saw the world like that - astrogators using books of navigation tables, slide rules, taking sextant readings from the stars, etc.

  23. Re:It was a "joke" back then on This 1981 BYTE Magazine Cover Explains Why We're So Bad At Tech Predictions · · Score: 2

    You don't need 4K^2 pixels. Your "retina" can't see them anyway, apparently. At least if you're hardware is "iPC" compatible.

    Sure, and your retina can't see VGA resolution resolution either.

    Not if you stand far enough away from the screen...

  24. Re:It was a "joke" back then on This 1981 BYTE Magazine Cover Explains Why We're So Bad At Tech Predictions · · Score: 1

    Good catch...

  25. Re:Fair point but. on This 1981 BYTE Magazine Cover Explains Why We're So Bad At Tech Predictions · · Score: 1

    The article makes it abundantly clear that this it's satire.

    I'm guessing the submitter didn't bother to click his own link.