Slashdot Mirror


User: diefuchsjagden

diefuchsjagden's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
31
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 31

  1. Re:Unauthorized impairment of a protected computer on Hacker Admits To Scientology DDoS Attack · · Score: 0

    DRM that stops your OS or drives from working properly?

    DRM is AUTHORIZED, when you consented to the Terms and Agreements of the software that installed the DRM you authorized the impairment of you computer, so no DRM does not count as "unauthorized impairment" just poor judgment

  2. Re:That's just plain stupid on Has Google Redefined Beta? · · Score: 0

    I mean, it's not like it's got a good cling to it. It just makes it sound like something unstable and unreliable.

    To me Beta does not mean unstable or un reliable, that would be alpha. Beta means to me that a project is under "active" development!

  3. Re:You say: Hijacking "Defense"... on Pentagon Wants Kill Switch For Planes · · Score: 0

    I didn't say it was likely, or even a high possibility, but its less likely that they fuck heads will be using box cutters, who's to say maybe they will go "high tech" seeing as they went "low tech" last time... there are an infinite number of ways to hijack a plane that one could dream up as possibilities, and also an infinite number of ways to stop it from happening. The problem is most people aren't devious enough to think up they ways until after the fact. I mean how many people saw a plan let alone 3 being hijacked by box cutters? I know I never would have. Then again I don't sit around all day dreaming up ways to harm others.

  4. Re:You say: Hijacking "Defense"... on Pentagon Wants Kill Switch For Planes · · Score: 0

    Locked door or not, after 9/11 it is no longer possible to hijack a plane and fly it into a building. what makes you so sure that it is NO longer possible? the fact that it hasn't happened theses eight since? well news flash it had not happened in the nearly 50 prior, so adds are it won't happen to day or tomorrow, I agree it is much less likely to happen now thank god but it is not an impossibility. Where there is a Will there is always a way, no matter how slim. and as far as stopping the plans before they take off what the fuck good will that do you? the Dick Shits who want to use the commuter plan as a weapon are not going to make their move on the ground they are going to wait till you are at maximum altitude and cruising velocity, just like the fuck wads did on 9/11, all this really does is take just a little bit more of our freedom away, "in the name of safety" next thing you know we are not going to be allowed to use the rest room on a plane, or will have to be escorted by an air marshal to the jon.
  5. Re:You've completely missed my point on RIM In Trouble For Not Violating Privacy · · Score: 1

    I was in agreement and merely trying to say that what a government calls its rights were originally the peoples but are no longer, or are at least limited. I said "rights" as a mode of saying the rights which governments claim they have are not rights they are an entirely "different can of worms"

  6. Re:Summary is indicative of the problem on RIM In Trouble For Not Violating Privacy · · Score: 1

    GOVERNMENTS DO NOT HAVE RIGHTS OF ANY KIND. Governments have powers. This IS NOT a simple semantic argument.
    I agree Governments have no rights in and of them selves, they do have "rights" which have been surrendered by the people as a particular governments "subjects" and they only obtain any rights by abusing their powers, which in most forms of government are also granted/lent or forcibly by the people that make up the populous any powers, are not innate to a Government just because it is Government. One cannot blame the "man" justly, because you are/we the "man". The Government is always in the minority and not in a safe position to anger the populous, and the only way they can gain "Rights" is to abuse what power the said populous has already lent/surrendered to said government, most of the time the populous doesn't even know they are/have surrendering anything because they are AFRAID of surrendering some other part of there life. The only time this would not be true is in a True Democracy with 100% participation or possibly in a true Communist state, though I am not sure of all the ins and outs there. In order for a government to have true "rights" it must be the People, not represent the People!! Governments are Terrorists as well using fear, as a means to an end. At least Governments which are not the people, and merely represent the People are, and to the best of my limited knowledge there has never been a government which was the people. Sure you could make the argument that ancient Greece or ancient Rome where the people, but was there 100% equal participation I don't believe so certain individuals "had more power" than others. and there is No WAY for a society especially one as large as India or even the US to guarantee "equal" rights to EVERYONE, some greedy selfish individuals will always push others around if given the chance, which is how we got "government" in the first place! OK Rant ended