Assuming this were true and that Apple will be able to collect voice data for training Siri, my guess is that Google has been ahead of them for more than 5 years with Google Voice's voice to text. That means that they already have more voice training samples for their voice recognition system. [FAIL]
My advice to you is to pursue a Master's degree in Software Engineering in a school and program that is going to advance your current skill set. Find a program that has a practical approach to s/w engineering over one that emphasizes on the theoretical aspects such as teaching you a new programming language and the likes. Some course work that you might want to make sure is included included: data modeling, software testing, project management, software design and architecture. While in the program try to get yourself involved in research work just in case you ever want to move on to get a PhD at a later date.
This is what I did and it has proven to be helpful in landing some amazing opportunities in various industries.
Investigate whether there was a compiler dependency in generating the working binary. My experience has been that some setups don't result in a working binary right away. You have to fiddle and almost get t othe point to replicating the initial build environment where the code was run on.
Look at design patterns when reverse engineering the code to somehow have a sandbox where the execution can be monitored.
This argument can be seen in a variety of forms. Here are the basics, with all the changes and upgrades Microsoft has made to its windows operating system, no application built to work under windows has ever failed from its initial release. Could you say the same about Apple's OS X? Try supporting legacy code "because you know you don't want to rewrite the damn application" and then we'll talk.
First they announce support for XPF an Adobe killer then this... really why are they doing all these or is it that Web 2.0 is changing the computing culture?
Me thinks that they have realized that to have an edge on Googazon they have to move to the service market but then get kick backs from their platform software.
It is simple, ask Robert Stephens the founder of Geek Squad he'll tell you. Geek squad doesn't really do anything. Best buy banks on the odds that whatever they sell to you won't need fixing at least not until you are ready to buy the next generation version of it. This is the training they have... Hey boy in white shirt and black pants, here is a hammer, treat everything as a nail. They break it, take the consequences but can afford to pay you off need-be. Geek Squad is just a publicity stunt.
"The technology could lead to robots able to carry out rescue operationsfire attacks by swarming over inaccessible areas to find any left living humans people,"
Performance Generally even with tweaks to the original configuration, PostgreSQL has slower low end performance. This in part to the way PostgreSQL handles incoming connections; PostgreSQL forks on every incoming connection whose backend setup is a bit slow. However by coding things as stored procedures, one might experience some improved performance. Compared to MySQL, MySQL is very fast on both simple and complex SELECTs. MySQL handles connections very fast thus making it a better candidate for multiple client applications that connect/disconnect all the time.
Text searching In most applications, text searching is a need more than just a want. Out of the box both PostgreSQL and MySQL ain't the top performers. (This is why people opt for commercial options). PostgreSQL text searching is enabled by an external tool (such as tsearch) not bundled by default with the DBMS engine. On the other hand, according to a manual release for MySQL 3.23 and later, full-text search using MATCH clauses and WITH QUERY EXPANSION are supported. Those who know the their database theory well will tell you that using pluggable extensions to the DBMS is just a bad idea when it comes to performance.
Feature Set
PostgreSQL wins hands down when it comes to features. This goes back to the philosophy behind the creation of PostgreSQL; Stack up features. Oh the philosophy on MySQL is ramp up the speed.
Performance in a Distributed Environment
MySQL and PostgreSQL have support for replication. However MySQL replication has been thoroughly tested, thanks to the large user community that MySQL enjoys also. Unlike inbuilt replication methodologies employed in MySQL, according to the PostgreSQL 8.0.7 Documentation release, PostgreSQL replication solutions are developed externally for example Slony-I which boasts popular slave/master replication. Besides Slony-I there are other commercial and non-commercial replication solutions for PostgreSQL.
These are some of the core reasons why people choose one DBMS over the other. I don't know about you. I recently read an article that suggested that people who are jumping on to the Postgres bandwagon are just doing so in the hopes of using some of its features down the line, but the truth is you can do just as well with MySQL. Hey innoDB will be gone in a few years... Yeah Oracle sucks but you can now get Oracle Express.
I just spent a few minutes perusing some of the replies made on this post and it I can conclude that it is evident that both managers and just regular IT folks do understand and condone the status quo as far as racism at the workplace is concern. I a black male have had to face instances well understood by wearing the color discrimination goggle.
For example since I graduated from college in 2004, I had the opportunity to interview with an array of IT managers at different companies here in the Mid-West United States. Some were phone-based and others were in-person interviews. All of my "first" in-person interviews resulted in an we apologize, found other well qualified individuals who were interested in this position note. So I never had the chance to meet the same individuals the second time round. However interstingly enough all of my "first" phone based interviews always opened the avenues for the second interview. However at the end of the day, I would get turned down for some obscure reason, one that I could not challenge like for example my immigration status (I happen not to be a black American).
That did go on for a while, which led me into developing a more disciplined approach in my interviewing process to allow me to make conclusions like I am about to tell you. I ensured that my over the phone and inperson demeanour matched and that while interviewing over the phone, I only restricted myself to the resources that I would if I was at the interview in person. I wouldn't go as far as coining this an "actual lab test" but it came close.
With that approach I confortably made this conclusion, they will dislike you the moment they see you. And I knew this would go on for a while until we taught the now "tender-generation" how to treat people who are not neccessarily physicaly similar to themselves.
All bad stories do have a bad ending, after all that, I landed a job on the first-phone, second-inperson basis with a bunch of emails in between. But the art to it all and maybe to non-minorities finding it difficult to land a dream job is to be yourself and make the interview longer (Fully elaborate your answers).
Just like my poor friend who has no respect to the art of listening developed in the medieval days, I do face opposition to my proposals. However unlike you, I listen and from that, I have gained impeccable knowledge into the art of software engineering and yes I am looking into swiching careers (and or advancing my conventional knowledge base) so that outsourcing my job would make my great grandfathers turn in their graves. (I am not a capitalist drove)
What are the grounds for claiming that this is a leaked memo. The NY Times claims that it obtained this memo yesterday....The memos were obtained on Tuesday afternoon by The New York Times. A Microsoft spokesman confirmed their authenticity, but would not comment on their substance...
The substance is great though this does seem as though MS is trying to cash in on some of the vertical markets.
All the (*) Microsoft Killer talk is old. I think what new vendors ought to do is to change the way of thinking that Microsoft has cultivated in its users. Show people that things can be different. But I know someone is going to say that that has been tried already. Honestly * Whatever Killer is a product bound for doom.
Sounds good to me. Sometimes you wonder if you are doing everything right if you don't get any errors or warning messages. Windows users love that. It makes them more aware of what is going on with the system. I propose a dead penguin to show up once in a while even when the problem is too obvious.
Slashdot Mirror
Assuming this were true and that Apple will be able to collect voice data for training Siri, my guess is that Google has been ahead of them for more than 5 years with Google Voice's voice to text. That means that they already have more voice training samples for their voice recognition system. [FAIL]
My advice to you is to pursue a Master's degree in Software Engineering in a school and program that is going to advance your current skill set. Find a program that has a practical approach to s/w engineering over one that emphasizes on the theoretical aspects such as teaching you a new programming language and the likes. Some course work that you might want to make sure is included included: data modeling, software testing, project management, software design and architecture. While in the program try to get yourself involved in research work just in case you ever want to move on to get a PhD at a later date. This is what I did and it has proven to be helpful in landing some amazing opportunities in various industries.
Investigate whether there was a compiler dependency in generating the working binary. My experience has been that some setups don't result in a working binary right away. You have to fiddle and almost get t othe point to replicating the initial build environment where the code was run on.
Look at design patterns when reverse engineering the code to somehow have a sandbox where the execution can be monitored.
I concur
Like most successful hand held OS's it running some version of a Windows CE. Who knows maybe Windows Vista CE.
This argument can be seen in a variety of forms. Here are the basics, with all the changes and upgrades Microsoft has made to its windows operating system, no application built to work under windows has ever failed from its initial release. Could you say the same about Apple's OS X? Try supporting legacy code "because you know you don't want to rewrite the damn application" and then we'll talk.
First they announce support for XPF an Adobe killer then this ... really why are they doing all these or is it that Web 2.0 is changing the computing culture?
Me thinks that they have realized that to have an edge on Googazon they have to move to the service market but then get kick backs from their platform software.
It is simple, ask Robert Stephens the founder of Geek Squad he'll tell you. Geek squad doesn't really do anything. Best buy banks on the odds that whatever they sell to you won't need fixing at least not until you are ready to buy the next generation version of it. This is the training they have... Hey boy in white shirt and black pants, here is a hammer, treat everything as a nail. They break it, take the consequences but can afford to pay you off need-be. Geek Squad is just a publicity stunt.
"The technology could lead to robots able to carry out rescue operations fire attacks by swarming over inaccessible areas to find any left living humans people,"
Performance
Generally even with tweaks to the original configuration, PostgreSQL has slower low end performance. This in part to the way PostgreSQL handles incoming connections; PostgreSQL forks on every incoming connection whose backend setup is a bit slow. However by coding things as stored procedures, one might experience some improved performance. Compared to MySQL, MySQL is very fast on both simple and complex SELECTs. MySQL handles connections very fast thus making it a better candidate for multiple client applications that connect/disconnect all the time.
Text searching
In most applications, text searching is a need more than just a want. Out of the box both PostgreSQL and MySQL ain't the top performers. (This is why people opt for commercial options). PostgreSQL text searching is enabled by an external tool (such as tsearch) not bundled by default with the DBMS engine. On the other hand, according to a manual release for MySQL 3.23 and later, full-text search using MATCH clauses and WITH QUERY EXPANSION are supported. Those who know the their database theory well will tell you that using pluggable extensions to the DBMS is just a bad idea when it comes to performance.
Feature Set
PostgreSQL wins hands down when it comes to features. This goes back to the philosophy behind the creation of PostgreSQL; Stack up features. Oh the philosophy on MySQL is ramp up the speed.
Performance in a Distributed Environment
MySQL and PostgreSQL have support for replication. However MySQL replication has been thoroughly tested, thanks to the large user community that MySQL enjoys also. Unlike inbuilt replication methodologies employed in MySQL, according to the PostgreSQL 8.0.7 Documentation release, PostgreSQL replication solutions are developed externally for example Slony-I which boasts popular slave/master replication. Besides Slony-I there are other commercial and non-commercial replication solutions for PostgreSQL.
These are some of the core reasons why people choose one DBMS over the other. I don't know about you. I recently read an article that suggested that people who are jumping on to the Postgres bandwagon are just doing so in the hopes of using some of its features down the line, but the truth is you can do just as well with MySQL. Hey innoDB will be gone in a few years... Yeah Oracle sucks but you can now get Oracle Express.
I just spent a few minutes perusing some of the replies made on this post and it I can conclude that it is evident that both managers and just regular IT folks do understand and condone the status quo as far as racism at the workplace is concern. I a black male have had to face instances well understood by wearing the color discrimination goggle.
For example since I graduated from college in 2004, I had the opportunity to interview with an array of IT managers at different companies here in the Mid-West United States. Some were phone-based and others were in-person interviews. All of my "first" in-person interviews resulted in an we apologize, found other well qualified individuals who were interested in this position note. So I never had the chance to meet the same individuals the second time round. However interstingly enough all of my "first" phone based interviews always opened the avenues for the second interview. However at the end of the day, I would get turned down for some obscure reason, one that I could not challenge like for example my immigration status (I happen not to be a black American).
That did go on for a while, which led me into developing a more disciplined approach in my interviewing process to allow me to make conclusions like I am about to tell you. I ensured that my over the phone and inperson demeanour matched and that while interviewing over the phone, I only restricted myself to the resources that I would if I was at the interview in person. I wouldn't go as far as coining this an "actual lab test" but it came close.
With that approach I confortably made this conclusion, they will dislike you the moment they see you. And I knew this would go on for a while until we taught the now "tender-generation" how to treat people who are not neccessarily physicaly similar to themselves.
All bad stories do have a bad ending, after all that, I landed a job on the first-phone, second-inperson basis with a bunch of emails in between. But the art to it all and maybe to non-minorities finding it difficult to land a dream job is to be yourself and make the interview longer (Fully elaborate your answers).
Just like my poor friend who has no respect to the art of listening developed in the medieval days, I do face opposition to my proposals. However unlike you, I listen and from that, I have gained impeccable knowledge into the art of software engineering and yes I am looking into swiching careers (and or advancing my conventional knowledge base) so that outsourcing my job would make my great grandfathers turn in their graves. (I am not a capitalist drove)
What are the grounds for claiming that this is a leaked memo. The NY Times claims that it obtained this memo yesterday. ...The memos were obtained on Tuesday afternoon by The New York Times. A Microsoft spokesman confirmed their authenticity, but would not comment on their substance. ..
The substance is great though this does seem as though MS is trying to cash in on some of the vertical markets.
All the (*) Microsoft Killer talk is old. I think what new vendors ought to do is to change the way of thinking that Microsoft has cultivated in its users. Show people that things can be different. But I know someone is going to say that that has been tried already. Honestly * Whatever Killer is a product bound for doom.
Sounds good to me. Sometimes you wonder if you are doing everything right if you don't get any errors or warning messages. Windows users love that. It makes them more aware of what is going on with the system. I propose a dead penguin to show up once in a while even when the problem is too obvious.
Get a degree in Bioinformatics.