Yes, and the Senators should be reminded that they have no more power than Cnut demonstrated he had. Being democratically elected does not grant powers to alter or negate physical reality.
Well, the other to be sure of is that fucking retards will repeat Koch memes endlessly out of ignorance, stupidity, and well, just plain fucking cowardice.
About the only part of your construct that makes it explanatory is reasonably descriptive variable names. That's a lesson that can pretty much be applied to any modern programming language.
About the only actor in the reboots that I feel comes anywhere close to the original is Karl Urban as McCoy. Pine is just awful, and other than wearing the same shirt, has nothing in common with Shatner's Kirk. Zachary Quinto could probably be a passable Spock, if he wasn't waited with bad dialogue and pointless asides like the romantic angle with Uruha.
All in all, the reboots to me are little more than a series of films that vaguely resemble Star Trek, but in no substantial way evoke the original series' strengths, or even attempt to create the kind of chemistry that the Kirk-Spock-McCoy triad had. Now maybe it is impossible, as chemistry between actors isn't something you can really force, but heck these fan productions do a far better job of evoking the friendship than a multi million dollar film with one of Hollywood's "ace" directors and a cast filled with all the young beautiful people that one could possibly get under one roof.
I have as well. I feel it's money better spent than the money I forked over for the reboot films. At least when I look at the screen, I'm seeing what I consider the Star Trek experience, as opposed to a generic action film that happens to have the USS Enterprise.
They're okay, but not nearly enough lens flare, and man oh man, shot length is insane. I really do demand far more quick cuts and dialogue needs to be cut to about three words per cut. Being a modern viewer, I don't want to hear all that blah-blah-blah, and just want to be nailed with a solid hour of uninterpretable action, shallow dialogue, even shallow characterization, and bad (or possibly even missing) plotting.
I think an argument can be made for keeping imams known to preach violent jihad under surveillance, much as the FBI probably keeps a close eye on white suppremacist preachers who preach violent overthrow of government and racial violence.
I can't speak to docx compatibility, but I know xlsx compatibility has some sharp limitations where newer features in later versions of Excel are present.
Indeed. This comes awfully close to Thought Crime.
What I could understand, though I do struggle with it, is identifying those that appear to approve of terrorism, and keeping an eye on them. But of course that would be abused.
And what exactly does that mean? I can give you a list of biologists who claim Intelligent Design is true. It's a small list, dwarfed by the number of biologists who outright repudiate ID.
Slashdot Mirror
Sort of like your post.
He thinks his company's shareholders idiots. Like most CEOs.
Yes, and the Senators should be reminded that they have no more power than Cnut demonstrated he had. Being democratically elected does not grant powers to alter or negate physical reality.
And what percentage of C/C++ code is well written?
Or, to put it another way, is there any evidence that Java applications are LESS secure, on average, than C/C++ applications?
I know it's for mathematics and liquor.
Has fucking little to do with science, mind you.
Well, the other to be sure of is that fucking retards will repeat Koch memes endlessly out of ignorance, stupidity, and well, just plain fucking cowardice.
There's this story about Canut and the tide that the US Senate might want to ponder.
Reality owes no debt to anyone's political ideology.
I can see how ADD sufferers would prefer the cinematic version of an epileptic seizure.
Pleasant diphthongs?
About the only part of your construct that makes it explanatory is reasonably descriptive variable names. That's a lesson that can pretty much be applied to any modern programming language.
Or PHP vs C
About the only actor in the reboots that I feel comes anywhere close to the original is Karl Urban as McCoy. Pine is just awful, and other than wearing the same shirt, has nothing in common with Shatner's Kirk. Zachary Quinto could probably be a passable Spock, if he wasn't waited with bad dialogue and pointless asides like the romantic angle with Uruha.
All in all, the reboots to me are little more than a series of films that vaguely resemble Star Trek, but in no substantial way evoke the original series' strengths, or even attempt to create the kind of chemistry that the Kirk-Spock-McCoy triad had. Now maybe it is impossible, as chemistry between actors isn't something you can really force, but heck these fan productions do a far better job of evoking the friendship than a multi million dollar film with one of Hollywood's "ace" directors and a cast filled with all the young beautiful people that one could possibly get under one roof.
I have as well. I feel it's money better spent than the money I forked over for the reboot films. At least when I look at the screen, I'm seeing what I consider the Star Trek experience, as opposed to a generic action film that happens to have the USS Enterprise.
Unlike the two reboot films.
They're okay, but not nearly enough lens flare, and man oh man, shot length is insane. I really do demand far more quick cuts and dialogue needs to be cut to about three words per cut. Being a modern viewer, I don't want to hear all that blah-blah-blah, and just want to be nailed with a solid hour of uninterpretable action, shallow dialogue, even shallow characterization, and bad (or possibly even missing) plotting.
Because Alzheimer's doesn't cause "retardation".
I think an argument can be made for keeping imams known to preach violent jihad under surveillance, much as the FBI probably keeps a close eye on white suppremacist preachers who preach violent overthrow of government and racial violence.
I've even seen such complex documents munged in Word. Modern word processors really do suck at large complex documents, which is why there is Latex.
I can't speak to docx compatibility, but I know xlsx compatibility has some sharp limitations where newer features in later versions of Excel are present.
Indeed. This comes awfully close to Thought Crime.
What I could understand, though I do struggle with it, is identifying those that appear to approve of terrorism, and keeping an eye on them. But of course that would be abused.
Applying the Cameron Solution, all we need to do is ban spam... or email. I confess I'm not quite clear.
Do you apply your nihilistic philosophy to all branches of science?
And what exactly does that mean? I can give you a list of biologists who claim Intelligent Design is true. It's a small list, dwarfed by the number of biologists who outright repudiate ID.
The funny thing about science is that it doesn't give a fuck about your ideology.
As opposed the fucking scientists, idjit.