It's all about technique. You could use a Maul to cut tomatoes, sufficiently sharpened. Do not lack imagination and piss for accuracy, not distance. Disinterest will only get you wet pant legs.
I prefer the "scary-sharp" method of sharpening anything. That metal stick you see people rubbing knives on? That's a hone, a strop is a leather impregnated strap for sharpening straight razors. Stones , hones and strops don't even come close to Scary Sharp. I like to get it so sharp that I bleed when I just look at it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scary_sharp
Easy there, know who you are dealing with; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan_Myhrvold This Microshit Patent Troll is just waiting for you to possess or post a recipe that looks like his. This is how he makes money. Just watch what you cook and tell no one.
You didn't wipe, you stink, that's a fact. Soon you will be digging in you crack to relieve itching, that's a forecast. You won't get laid, that's an outcome.
Actually landfill digging would be a wonderful exercise for an archaeology class. It would provide a good sharpening of their forensics and teach them to be careful,(watch out for that glass,razor blades, sharps etc) be aware of their environment (lookout! Gull attack!) and sharpen deduction skills (what is this fluid in this balloon-like structure?).
No flamebait. +1 cutely devoid of history and social studies credits. Why questions are fruitless and can produce any answer the respondent feels like, not to mention it deals with motive, which is never a clear answer except to a first party. However, If you will note which countries produce the worlds goods and find a history of how they came into this, you will have answered your own initial question and can extrapolate the rest for yourself effortlessly.
Like they were fulla beans or something. Gotta fart, can't hold it, here's your 6% more, BRAAAAAAAAAPFFFFFFSSSSSSssssspoot! ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....
Yes, foods should be judged on their individual merits. Synthetic (which doesn't mean processed) lacks components and balance of the structure of natural food, this can be a dangerous oversight equal to finding a natural food to be slowly carcinogenic or such, with much more likelyhood. It would be foolish to trust the say-so of food company research, the buyable FDA, or even independent research that we weren't involved in personally. Given the state of corruption and malfeasance in the world of science today, you can't trust research anymore than a political campaign , even IF you could tell the difference. I am not just IMPLYING natural food is safer, I"M SAYING IT IN PLAIN EASY TO READ ENGLISH, so there will be no mistake. I KNOW natural food to be safe, you merely BELIEVE synthetic food is on someone elses say-so. Differentiate what you FEEL,THINK,KNOW and BELIEVE, this will clear a lot of confusion for you and others in the future. And yes,of course, you couldn't find context for my allergy statement, making some fruitless point about furtherance of our state. Given a brief meta-view of mans progress( we discovered what we can and can't eat long before anyone uttered the word science), your statements are irrational. Synthetic food merely makes up lost time and effort in producing natural foods. Laziness. With todays Aquaponics, Hydroponics, and other methods, time, space, effort are small and can feed the world, cut your bills , help ensure your health and make unmistakably delicious meals. You can eat the packaging my food comes in if you like, I'll eat real food. Time will be your unfortunate proof.
Yeah, too little, too late. They're gonna have to look under every rock to dig up a few who would believe them. Maybe they should have a more trustworthy spokesman speak for them, like a used car dealer.
Why should plastics leach estrogen-like chemicals into food? Wow, who was wrong about that one? It could be, that the data that needs to be followed is the lifetime of a group of human test subjects, which would be impractical for an inventor to bother to market. SOOOO, the way things work, is, YOU get to be the guinea pig along with a public that swallows the load the FDA spews from its pipe. You could answer your own question by reviewing evolution. What did we evolve to fuel ourselves with most efficiently? When you have the answer to that, you can experiment, take notes and reach the conclusion that I did. Natural foods in the right combination, increase your health, because we are set up to process them efficiently. Now I don't know how long you've been around, but, synthetic anything having anything to do with food has been a complete f**kup so far. Oh,grocery stores are full of all sorts of examples of food/synthesis and the aisles are filled with the examples of people buying those products. Just watch who reaches for the margarine or reaches into the frozen section for that crap. The snack aisles are a howl! I'm sure Cargill or Monsanto would love to take credit for feeding the world on recycled cardboard and condoms with 7 essential vitamins, thanks anyway. More for you. Now, also, by studying those who came before us, we know they ate everything (at least once) and doing so passed data from generation to generation by word of mouth until civilizations could record it and pass it on. Today, we are aware of damn near every plant on the planet and what it is good or bad for. So, check before you eat, if in doubt, and make accommodations for any allergies you may encounter.
My understanding of science is; that while it looks good in a on paper to say that the method was followed, it falls prey, far too often, to bias, corruption and poor review, to be much more than pissing in the wind, for practical purposes. So, with that in mind, I'd like to complete my personal evaluation of the likelyhood of any actual science being involved whether it be from an actual scientist or those bulbous punchinello waddling around in lab coats with squirting clipboards. By digging for more accurate data by producing a meta-set above the problem and applying data I already have with the algorithms I use, I can divine truth( more useful than most data), guide my well thought out future, and keep winning at the track. If you take offense to the latter of my post, I would urge you to put up or shut up. This is a game for men. Men bring money and do business, boys bring nothing and do nothing.
Well, maybe... Is this the same troupe of clowns modeling Earths imminent destruction from global warming? If it is, perhaps it would be more fruitful to debate them against $cientology , Fundamental Christianity and Martha Stewart. My money is on Martha.
Must've gotten a large supply for free to shill it. Well , he's well on his way to intestinal problems, digestive problems and lowering his I.Q. Synthetic garbage can NEVER replace the fuel we are set up for. Honestly it's as bad as taking Zoloft, Effexor and others to " get better", also, never going to happen, but you will spend a lot of money and waste a lot of your life doing so. I f a moron can advocate others taking this food, perhaps it is the first sign that his code is shit as well as his brain. He certainly lacks as a journalist. We need regulators to regulate the Food and Drug regulators. Possibly stick a cattle prod up their ass, weekly until they "GET IT".
Politicians who do nothing are preferable to those who do things. Duties are a given, outside of that, finding reasons to spend money, fixing things that aren't broken, concocting programs to pay off the voters support for the next election. Nope, give me the reluctant marm. I'll even lower his pay. You can give the zealous, a mop and a toilet brush. They belong where they will do little harm and more good.
Slashdot Mirror
It's all about technique. You could use a Maul to cut tomatoes, sufficiently sharpened. Do not lack imagination and piss for accuracy, not distance.
Disinterest will only get you wet pant legs.
Kind of goes without saying. You can't work metal successfully without lube.
Kind of like, you have to hold your breath underwater.
Check the thread on coprolites elsewhere in the forum today.
It's the #2 contest.
Hmmm, I just cut an onion with a straight.
I saw a man shave with an ax.
Did you have some sort of obfuscated point?
Scary sharp method , I assume.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scary_sharp
I use it on everything I want to cut with.
I prefer the "scary-sharp" method of sharpening anything.
That metal stick you see people rubbing knives on? That's a hone, a strop is a leather impregnated strap for sharpening straight razors.
Stones , hones and strops don't even come close to Scary Sharp. I like to get it so sharp that I bleed when I just look at it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scary_sharp
Easy there, know who you are dealing with; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan_Myhrvold
This Microshit Patent Troll is just waiting for you to possess or post a recipe that looks like his.
This is how he makes money. Just watch what you cook and tell no one.
Oh you ran into the Nintendo strata! You might find plumbers poop too. Everytime they got turtle bit...OH SHIT!
You didn't wipe, you stink, that's a fact.
Soon you will be digging in you crack to relieve itching, that's a forecast.
You won't get laid, that's an outcome.
I hear ya brother, I'm colder than hell this week. Turn up the cow flatulence a bit, would you?
"But what if "garbage in = garbage out" doesn't hold true in the future? "
Introducing a new line of USED FOOD STORES!
Where there's always a sale on corn...
Actually landfill digging would be a wonderful exercise for an archaeology class. It would provide a good sharpening of their forensics and teach them to be careful,(watch out for that glass,razor blades, sharps etc) be aware of their environment (lookout! Gull attack!) and sharpen deduction skills (what is this fluid in this balloon-like structure?).
Yeah, but it's a shitty job and you wind up working with assholes.
No flamebait.
+1 cutely devoid of history and social studies credits.
Why questions are fruitless and can produce any answer the respondent feels like, not to mention it deals with motive, which is never a clear answer except to a first party. However, If you will note which countries produce the worlds goods and find a history of how they came into this, you will have answered your own initial question and can extrapolate the rest for yourself effortlessly.
Like they were fulla beans or something.
Gotta fart, can't hold it, here's your 6% more, BRAAAAAAAAAPFFFFFFSSSSSSssssspoot!
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....
Yes, foods should be judged on their individual merits. Synthetic (which doesn't mean processed) lacks components and balance of the structure of natural food, this can be a dangerous oversight equal to finding a natural food to be slowly carcinogenic or such, with much more likelyhood. It would be foolish to trust the say-so of food company research, the buyable FDA, or even independent research that we weren't involved in personally. Given the state of corruption and malfeasance in the world of science today, you can't trust research anymore than a political campaign , even IF you could tell the difference. ,of course, you couldn't find context for my allergy statement, making some fruitless point about furtherance of our state.
I am not just IMPLYING natural food is safer, I"M SAYING IT IN PLAIN EASY TO READ ENGLISH, so there will be no mistake. I KNOW natural food to be safe, you merely BELIEVE synthetic food is on someone elses say-so. Differentiate what you FEEL,THINK,KNOW and BELIEVE, this will clear a lot of confusion for you and others in the future.
And yes
Given a brief meta-view of mans progress( we discovered what we can and can't eat long before anyone uttered the word science), your statements are irrational. Synthetic food merely makes up lost time and effort in producing natural foods. Laziness. With todays Aquaponics, Hydroponics, and other methods, time, space, effort are small and can feed the world, cut your bills , help ensure your health and make unmistakably delicious meals.
You can eat the packaging my food comes in if you like, I'll eat real food. Time will be your unfortunate proof.
Yeah, too little, too late. They're gonna have to look under every rock to dig up a few who would believe them. Maybe they should have a more trustworthy spokesman speak for them, like a used car dealer.
click the mouse, win a "Darwin"
Why should plastics leach estrogen-like chemicals into food? Wow, who was wrong about that one? It could be, that the data that needs to be followed is the lifetime of a group of human test subjects, which would be impractical for an inventor to bother to market. SOOOO, the way things work, is, YOU get to be the guinea pig along with a public that swallows the load the FDA spews from its pipe. ,grocery stores are full of all sorts of examples of food/synthesis and the aisles are filled with the examples of people buying those products. Just watch who reaches for the margarine or reaches into the frozen section for that crap. The snack aisles are a howl! I'm sure Cargill or Monsanto would love to take credit for feeding the world on recycled cardboard and condoms with 7 essential vitamins, thanks anyway. More for you.
You could answer your own question by reviewing evolution. What did we evolve to fuel ourselves with most efficiently? When you have the answer to that, you can experiment, take notes and reach the conclusion that I did. Natural foods in the right combination, increase your health, because we are set up to process them efficiently. Now I don't know how long you've been around, but, synthetic anything having anything to do with food has been a complete f**kup so far. Oh
Now, also, by studying those who came before us, we know they ate everything (at least once) and doing so passed data from generation to generation by word of mouth until civilizations could record it and pass it on. Today, we are aware of damn near every plant on the planet and what it is good or bad for. So, check before you eat, if in doubt, and make accommodations for any allergies you may encounter.
My understanding of science is; that while it looks good in a on paper to say that the method was followed, it falls prey, far too often, to bias, corruption and poor review, to be much more than pissing in the wind, for practical purposes. So, with that in mind, I'd like to complete my personal evaluation of the likelyhood of any actual science being involved whether it be from an actual scientist or those bulbous punchinello waddling around in lab coats with squirting clipboards. By digging for more accurate data by producing a meta-set above the problem and applying data I already have with the algorithms I use, I can divine truth( more useful than most data), guide my well thought out future, and keep winning at the track.
If you take offense to the latter of my post, I would urge you to put up or shut up. This is a game for men. Men bring money and do business, boys bring nothing and do nothing.
Well, maybe...
Is this the same troupe of clowns modeling Earths imminent destruction from global warming?
If it is, perhaps it would be more fruitful to debate them against $cientology , Fundamental Christianity and Martha Stewart.
My money is on Martha.
Damn I was hopin' this article was about an appendage salesman. I wanted to go to work with the efficiency of Doc Octopus.
Must've gotten a large supply for free to shill it.
Well , he's well on his way to intestinal problems, digestive problems and lowering his I.Q.
Synthetic garbage can NEVER replace the fuel we are set up for.
Honestly it's as bad as taking Zoloft, Effexor and others to " get better", also, never going to happen, but you will spend a lot of money and waste a lot of your life doing so. I f a moron can advocate others taking this food, perhaps it is the first sign that his code is shit as well as his brain. He certainly lacks as a journalist.
We need regulators to regulate the Food and Drug regulators. Possibly stick a cattle prod up their ass, weekly until they "GET IT".
Politicians who do nothing are preferable to those who do things. Duties are a given, outside of that, finding reasons to spend money, fixing things that aren't broken, concocting programs to pay off the voters support for the next election.
Nope, give me the reluctant marm. I'll even lower his pay. You can give the zealous, a mop and a toilet brush. They belong where they will do little harm and more good.
Euro moral values?!
+1 funny
A little long winded, but the punchline is sublime.