Flip a coin, shut down a program and call the accountants to call it a loss on taxes. What's the problem here? Looks ordinary to me. Next up, the Google inflatable mate w/ bucking mechanism and heater, it makes it's own pr0n movies and uploads them to Redtube while you pump away. It collects customer data to recommend lube, toys or Viagra. It also has a government backdoor...
And yet it still has nothing to do with standards of language construction. It is about definitions, including slang and pop culture invention. At best it will show nouns, verbs and pronunciation. We might as well get a manual on the Ford Fiesta to consult in a matter of the English language.
That makes me think of what happened in a section 8 neighborhood here a few years ago. A young couple battling to raise a family in the midst of roaches, dog shit, diapers and Coke cans, decided to home school. The children were taught and allowed to speak only Klingon....
Welllll, you can just guess what SRS had to say about all that. I'm gonna guess by now the kids speak English and whisper amongst themselves in Klingon, presuming they are in the same foster home.
I just heard the other day about a coalition of Hawaiian natives buying back as much land as they can for the locals. This drama is not nearly over yet...
Andropause, you're entering Andropause. The correct answer to your question is every guy capable of bedding a 20 year old girl would like to do so, if only for the chance of pumping a baby into her to further his gene pool and emanate virility to his social peers. No one said anything about finding a social/psychological equal to marry. Yes even the most advanced geek ( or at least the top 4% of minds, which I can speak for) want to fuck. Nothing to do with finding love or companionship, that's a totally different concept. They want to fuck and if you don't, perhaps you should see a doctor and through hormone therapy, you can feel what you've been missing; horny young sluts w/ daddy issues. Now quit assuming everyone buys that plastic politically correct crap you're selling.
Most? I doubt that most bring their wives along and will act just as if they were 13 in her absence. Here, take this, you'll groove, it's a reality pill.
I guess you could say " the hermaphrodites can just go fuck themselves", and be correct, politically and morally. Wanna be Secretary of State? The last dude resigned.
Yes, added functionality, that's the answer. What could go wrong? Worst case scenario, a bored/drunk/disenchanted DBA goes through randomly changing sex on thousands of patients. Hospital sells info to advertisers who begin sending Kotex, Viagra, Douche, Aftate spam to entirely the wrong people. Hijinx ensue, Jim Carrey stars in the "made for television" version, a league of transgendered lawyers sue for defamation and trademark violations, dogs sleeping with cats, cats sleeping with mice, it'll be anarchy! And YOU, you want software with added functionality, Haven't been paying attention to Microsoft over the years, have you?
STAN: I want to be a woman. From now on, I want you all to call me 'Loretta'.
REG: What?!
LORETTA: It's my right as a man.
JUDITH: Well, why do you want to be Loretta, Stan?
LORETTA: I want to have babies.
REG: You want to have babies?!
LORETTA: It's every man's right to have babies if he wants them.
REG: But... you can't have babies.
LORETTA: Don't you oppress me.
REG: I'm not oppressing you, Stan. You haven't got a womb! Where's the foetus going to gestate?! You going to keep it in a box?!
LORETTA: crying
JUDITH: Here! I-- I've got an idea. Suppose you agree that he can't actually have babies, not having a womb, which is nobody's fault, not even the Romans', but that he can have the right to have babies.
FRANCIS: Good idea, Judith. We shall fight the oppressors for your right to have babies, brother. Sister. Sorry.
REG: What's the point?
FRANCIS: What?
REG: What's the point of fighting for his right to have babies when he can't have babies?!
FRANCIS: It is symbolic of our struggle against oppression.
Tithing needs no promotion. It's a Christian thing, it's advocated in the church. They're supposed to be using it according to instruction. If not, I suppose that opens them to ridicule and mocking from the public in general. I wonder that the homeless, destitute , ill and infirm aren't on the church lawns on Sunday to shame the Christians into shelling out for their care instead of that " mens retreat" or foyer wallpaper or Sunday school bus or other objects du jour churches pad their amenities with to attract "tithers". It's really all a matter of "Do they do as YHVH commands or do they run a profitable carnival?" There's not much acceptable as excuses in-between. I'd threaten their tax-free status if they weren't coughing up 100% after Church overhead and maintenance for one of their "prime directives". I'm sure it's all just a matter of focus, once everyone gets on the same page.
Where is this benevolent diety in the Bible? I've read it cover to cover, many versions, Apocrypha, early writings, studied relevant history and still can't find this protector of the poor, sick and innocent. "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword." Who said that? Genghis Khan? Lex Luthor? Darth Vader? Nope, Jesus Christ said it. No one promised a benevolent diety, but some pastor with their offering plate in your face. You been had.
Who keeps spreading this garbage about God supposed to make life all soft and safe for the innocent and believers? I never did get that argument. Usually trotted out by atheist converts to counter "feel good" dogma propagated by corporate churches and popular sects. Now me, I like an atheist who has read the Bible, Apocrypha and early Christian writings, has some history, archaeology, etymology or other supporting science under their belt and has done some rigor for their lack of faith. They would never make such a gaffe.
In addition, it would be much more profitable for a young,dumb atheist , to point out that Christ commanded the church to work with the sick and poor. But then you'd have to be well read enough to support the mocking of todays elaborate churches with their P.A. systems, projectors, modern architecture and "programs" for attendees and members with only occasional "canned good drives" to rationalize their part in "helping the poor".
This is Slashdot, be something more than an atheist equivalent of Beavis or you'll get thrown to the Christians for our entertainment.
Several times God commanded it, endorsed rulers who practiced violence , wiped out worshipers of other "Gods" and let's not forget the Plagues that predated chemical warfare by many centuries. Atheists aren't made in foxholes, they're made in church pews. The fault lies in the milktoast politically correct,historically incorrect, censored, edited, watered down, council of Trent approved garbage preached by modern organized religion. It doesn't make sense, often misinterpreted for the sake reflecting "feel good" dogma practiced by the money hungry corporate entities. Who believes that garbage anyway? They just go and sit through it to appear morally superior to anyone bothered to notice.Besides that, I know at least one Atheist made in seminary and can imagine more would occur.
Slashdot Mirror
Flip a coin, shut down a program and call the accountants to call it a loss on taxes. What's the problem here? Looks ordinary to me.
Next up, the Google inflatable mate w/ bucking mechanism and heater, it makes it's own pr0n movies and uploads them to Redtube while you pump away.
It collects customer data to recommend lube, toys or Viagra. It also has a government backdoor...
And yet it still has nothing to do with standards of language construction. It is about definitions, including slang and pop culture invention. At best it will show nouns, verbs and pronunciation.
We might as well get a manual on the Ford Fiesta to consult in a matter of the English language.
https://www.goofball.com/news/trek_star_Stinking_Klingons_Like_Cats_in_Kansas
Echoes of the older news items.
Bad citations, no standards.
Dictionaries carry no standards between them and are about as trustworthy for a final determination as a comic book.
https://www.goofball.com/news/trek_star_Stinking_Klingons_Like_Cats_in_Kansas
Seems to be remnants of the fallout.
*citation needed
" I also learnt German"
I have also learned German.
Grammar wha?...
That makes me think of what happened in a section 8 neighborhood here a few years ago. A young couple battling to raise a family in the midst of roaches, dog shit, diapers and Coke cans, decided to home school. The children were taught and allowed to speak only Klingon....
Welllll, you can just guess what SRS had to say about all that.
I'm gonna guess by now the kids speak English and whisper amongst themselves in Klingon, presuming they are in the same foster home.
I just heard the other day about a coalition of Hawaiian natives buying back as much land as they can for the locals.
This drama is not nearly over yet...
With enough money, you are the government. Haven't you been paying attention to U.S. history at all?
Andropause, you're entering Andropause. The correct answer to your question is every guy capable of bedding a 20 year old girl would like to do so, if only for the chance of pumping a baby into her to further his gene pool and emanate virility to his social peers. No one said anything about finding a social/psychological equal to marry. Yes even the most advanced geek ( or at least the top 4% of minds, which I can speak for) want to fuck. Nothing to do with finding love or companionship, that's a totally different concept. They want to fuck and if you don't, perhaps you should see a doctor and through hormone therapy, you can feel what you've been missing; horny young sluts w/ daddy issues.
Now quit assuming everyone buys that plastic politically correct crap you're selling.
Most? I doubt that most bring their wives along and will act just as if they were 13 in her absence. Here, take this, you'll groove, it's a reality pill.
I guess you could say " the hermaphrodites can just go fuck themselves", and be correct, politically and morally. Wanna be Secretary of State? The last dude resigned.
Yes, added functionality, that's the answer. What could go wrong?
Worst case scenario, a bored/drunk/disenchanted DBA goes through randomly changing sex on thousands of patients.
Hospital sells info to advertisers who begin sending Kotex, Viagra, Douche, Aftate spam to entirely the wrong people.
Hijinx ensue, Jim Carrey stars in the "made for television" version, a league of transgendered lawyers sue for defamation and trademark violations, dogs sleeping with cats, cats sleeping with mice, it'll be anarchy! And YOU, you want software with added functionality, Haven't been paying attention to Microsoft over the years, have you?
FRANCIS: Why are you always on about women, Stan?
STAN: I want to be one.
REG: What?
STAN: I want to be a woman. From now on, I want you all to call me 'Loretta'.
REG: What?!
LORETTA: It's my right as a man.
JUDITH: Well, why do you want to be Loretta, Stan?
LORETTA: I want to have babies.
REG: You want to have babies?!
LORETTA: It's every man's right to have babies if he wants them.
REG: But... you can't have babies.
LORETTA: Don't you oppress me.
REG: I'm not oppressing you, Stan. You haven't got a womb! Where's the foetus going to gestate?! You going to keep it in a box?!
LORETTA: crying
JUDITH: Here! I-- I've got an idea. Suppose you agree that he can't actually have babies, not having a womb, which is nobody's fault, not even the Romans', but that he can have the right to have babies.
FRANCIS: Good idea, Judith. We shall fight the oppressors for your right to have babies, brother. Sister. Sorry.
REG: What's the point?
FRANCIS: What?
REG: What's the point of fighting for his right to have babies when he can't have babies?!
FRANCIS: It is symbolic of our struggle against oppression.
REG: Symbolic of his struggle against reality.
Where are the Snowdens of yesteryear?
I don't think there'll be many bullets at a congressional inquiry over tax status.
Tithing needs no promotion. It's a Christian thing, it's advocated in the church. They're supposed to be using it according to instruction. If not, I suppose that opens them to ridicule and mocking from the public in general. I wonder that the homeless, destitute , ill and infirm aren't on the church lawns on Sunday to shame the Christians into shelling out for their care instead of that " mens retreat" or foyer wallpaper or Sunday school bus or other objects du jour churches pad their amenities with to attract "tithers".
It's really all a matter of "Do they do as YHVH commands or do they run a profitable carnival?" There's not much acceptable as excuses in-between. I'd threaten their tax-free status if they weren't coughing up 100% after Church overhead and maintenance for one of their "prime directives".
I'm sure it's all just a matter of focus, once everyone gets on the same page.
Volkswagen does it again!
A car you can fold up and put in your wallet.
Apple files patent for digital wallet drivers license,receipts, business cards,proof of insurance and condoms.
On the other hand, by some etymology accounts, he is a pretty good cannabis/hashish god who at least tolerates prostitution, wine and a good steak.
Where is this benevolent diety in the Bible?
I've read it cover to cover, many versions, Apocrypha, early writings, studied relevant history and still can't find this protector of the poor, sick and innocent.
"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword." Who said that? Genghis Khan? Lex Luthor? Darth Vader? Nope, Jesus Christ said it.
No one promised a benevolent diety, but some pastor with their offering plate in your face. You been had.
Who keeps spreading this garbage about God supposed to make life all soft and safe for the innocent and believers?
I never did get that argument. Usually trotted out by atheist converts to counter "feel good" dogma propagated by corporate churches and popular sects.
Now me, I like an atheist who has read the Bible, Apocrypha and early Christian writings, has some history, archaeology, etymology or other supporting science under their belt and has done some rigor for their lack of faith. They would never make such a gaffe.
In addition, it would be much more profitable for a young ,dumb atheist , to point out that Christ commanded the church to work with the sick and poor. But then you'd have to be well read enough to support the mocking of todays elaborate churches with their P.A. systems, projectors, modern architecture and "programs" for attendees and members with only occasional "canned good drives" to rationalize their part in "helping the poor".
This is Slashdot, be something more than an atheist equivalent of Beavis or you'll get thrown to the Christians for our entertainment.
Several times God commanded it, endorsed rulers who practiced violence , wiped out worshipers of other "Gods" and let's not forget the Plagues that predated chemical warfare by many centuries.
Atheists aren't made in foxholes, they're made in church pews. The fault lies in the milktoast politically correct,historically incorrect, censored, edited, watered down, council of Trent approved garbage preached by modern organized religion. It doesn't make sense, often misinterpreted for the sake reflecting "feel good" dogma practiced by the money hungry corporate entities. Who believes that garbage anyway? They just go and sit through it to appear morally superior to anyone bothered to notice.Besides that, I know at least one Atheist made in seminary and can imagine more would occur.