i think most of what destroys a tank is the rapid decompression caused by the round piercing the armour. the round already on impact shoots a jet of white-hot metal. that hopefully will ignight the amunition inside, but the decompression will kill or damage the people inside. I am not sure that a laser would cause rapid decompression. But i'm not a scientist.
Welth should be a limited resource. But now we have no gold or silver standard. we have no standard for hard money at all. Paper currency is worthless, and electronic currency even more so. Just because we can now make unlimited "money" doesn't mean that real welth -- stacks of the shiney stuff -- is unlimited. precious metals, gems, and real estate -- that's welth. Money is just money and it's not even that.
Stalin was not an ally of the United States, he was an ally of FDR who sucked ass. Also, I do not believe that we were ever in bed with Ho Chi Minh. Only Jane Fonda was. Prove that shit. THe rest, sure. Perhaps you should have used Bin Laden instead of "Uncle Ho" -- everyone already knows that is true.
part of the America First Party platform is that there should always be paper trail, and that e-voting is probably just altogether bad.
AFP is also pretty much the only conservative party in support of the working class, against illegal imigration, outsourcing, et cetera, instead of the interests of corporate internationalist oligarchs. Much better than stupid libertarian hippies anyway.
the vast majority of Soviet leaders, both in and out of Russia were Jews. somthing like 90% of pre-war communist agitators across Europe were Jews. Jews own the media and the banks in this country. The Israeli lobby owns Congress. There are 27 high ranking Jews in the current administration. There are not 20,000,000 Jews in the world and even before the holocaust, there never have been at any one time.
That is why no one criticises Soviet gulags. They were Jewish contraptions. Stalin was not a Jew. Trotsky was. Lenin was 1/4 Jewish. View this site:
There is a list of all the soviet leadership in the polit bureaus and all taht shit. See how many Jews? and there are not that many Jews. Even Kruschev was married to a Jew. His children were raised Jewish. He said "we will burry you from within," and he ment the Jewbolschevicks in this country.
Every convicted Soviet spy in the 40s and 50s were Jewish. Jews like Abbie Hoffman and Emma Goldman advocated anarchy. Jews like Charles Krauthammer and Paul Wolfowitz are responsible for "neo-conservatism" which I am sure you will hate.
So, no, I don't really give half a damn that Jews allegedly got "holocausted." In fact, I believe there is sufficiant evidence to point to the gas chambers as having been concoted by the Soviet Union and the evidence given up at Nuremburg (without the benefit of allowing western allies in to check the truthfulness) was all fraudulent. the Soviet Union was largely a Jewish creation, after all.
there can't BE gun CRIME without gun LAWS. No law, no crime.
There were crimes that happened to be committed with guns, but they would be no less illegal if with knives, baseball bats, or chainsaws.
A gun is a tool. It serves a purpose. Some people use them for good, others for ill. It's not the gun's fault. I have lots here and none of them has ever told me to go rob the ABC store.
diisidents are criminals in their countries. So, I suspect that you mean that terrorists do things which sane people in other countries would also consider criminal?
Unitarians are a cult. They have no political power. Like Branch Davidians. But then it's all terminology again I guess.
I guess the difference boils down to Provisional Sinn Fein wants a United Ireland. Republican Sinn Fein wants a federal ireland (each 9-county province (3 counties of Ulster are in the Republic) has a "state legislature" then sends representatives to Dublin). Fianna Fail and Fine Gael pay lip service to their fouding ideologies but just stick with the way things are.
Only, that is Ireland, not America. The point is all the parties that will ever get elected in this country in the near future suck ass, abuse the people, and all need to die horrible deaths.
I respect the Federal system, although I believe the Anti-Federalst argument of those such as Patrick Henry was stronger and more correct.
A Nation is more the thing such as the "Cherokee Nation" -- that is, the people, being a distinct and separate group with an idenity and collective self-interest. The Country is where they live. The State is the political carapase which is supposed to protect the Nation and the Country.
We are a union of the several soverign States, although we, Americans, that is, the decendents of those who founded this country (for instance, I am in direct lineal decent of William Dawes -- a rider with Paul Revere) are the Nation (there are thus arguably different National groups here -- such as "mexican ameriacns" or "african americans" or jews). The whole chunk we claim is the Country.
So, use Unitarians instead. or Anti-Americans, as they are against the arraingment which has served us well and for which our forebearers fought and died. But the fact is, both those you label as "Nationalists" and "Internationalists," are internationalists in their policies and whatnot -- both sides are lead by rich oligarchs who would sell out their own mother to make a buck, let alone the American people. So fuck them.
Republicans seek "Free Trade" and a "Global Economy", abusing illegal immgration to get a slave class to work the jobs they cant ship over seas. They allow Israel to control our foreign policy.
Democrats want a "Global Culture" and a world government. They allow Israel to control the down-beating of the majority in America, with their so-called "equal rights" which are merely favours for minority and alien groups at the expense of the majority of americans, and "hate crimes" legistlation which seeks to limit freedom of speech. Britain's Race Relations Act is similar -- if even one minority or alien claims to be provoked by a BNP, National Front, or whatever rally, the cops will close it down. How is that Democracy? How is that fair? It's destroying Britain for Britons.
No, you cannot trust any politicians. Revolution is likely immenant. However, if you wish to be peaceful, I suggest looking into the Nationalist Movement. They are the only rightist movement to have won cases before the Supereme Court, advocate full democracy, majority rule, justice for all and favours for none.
Libertarians are hippies, constitutionalists are baptist scum. Greens are Commies. It's really the only choice to save America for Americans, remove foreign influence, oppose the war on constitutional grounds, secure our country against the real enemies and not the citizens, eliminate corrupt politicians, et cetera.
Even Linus has stated numerous times, for instance, in his essay for "Open Sources" that taking on Microsoft was not the goal. Hell, Linux wasn't even meant to replace UNIX. It's all just a happy accident.
BSD wasn't meant to replace anything. It was a project by a school to do stuff which got turned into a personal project to replace that in order that it could continue unhindred.
I really dont understand what this obsession is with "replacing" microsoft. Most people really don't care. Nothing is stopping you from doing what you're doing. Why try and stop them?
I fear the "hacker spirit" of learning and invention has been replaced by a generation of people who use Linux just to be "l3t0 k3wl" and hate on Microsoft instead of trying to make the software better, do neat things, and learn how the computer works. Its sad really. It also show a lack of disconnect with the real world in which real work must be done. Not everyone can sit around and hack up their system and play on the computer all day. Most people dont care. Windows 2000 Pro is actually not that bad. I have no problems with it, myself. I can do my work and then have fun. In high school (graduated '02), I spent more time with my computer in parts and recompiling and tweeking shit than I did in a word processor and working. My grades suffered accordingly. Of course, AbiWord was nothing to write home about then, OO didn't exist and StarOffic wasn't "Free" as in no money unitl I was a senior, iirc.
But still, its a little irrational and vitriolic, all this "lets conqurer MS!!" not that I didn't engage in it myself when I was like, 14.
Hitler was ethnically German. The difference is more or less "where you born in new york or virginia?" It's all America, and that's all Germanic territory.
in National Socialism, all infrastructure which is common to the people is nationalized -- so power, water, roads, rail, airline, et etera. health care and schools and junk too I guess.
Then there are small private enterprises -- your bakers, cobblers, tailors and junk.
Citizens are entitled to all public services, but are required in turn to serve the public.
Non citizens get whatever's the leftovers because they don't belong anyway and need to go away.
National Socialism is actually rather nice. Except this pesky "Third Reich" experiment at it went horribly wrong. or did it? http://vho.org/GB/c/DC/gcgvcole.html
David Cole, a Jew, says the gassings never happened and are fabricated by the Jewish Bolshevick Soviet Union.
True or not, holocaust or not, National Socailism is nice. So long as people stay on their own side of the street. Moochers and parasites must be dealt with, of course. But citizens are rather independent outside of their required service (military).
Dude, capitalism is about getting as much money as possible and screw everybody else. Competition is only a happy biproduct that temporarily benefits the victims of capitalism until a monopoly is acheived and innovation stops.
Of course, communism is stupid and starves millions of people to death with its retardedness.
The moral of the story is no economic system is good.
the interstate highway system was developed because of the Cold War. You can drive all your trucks and tanks at once instead of loading only a few on trains. ALso, one mile in 4 (or 5? i dont remember right now) is straight. The interstate highway also functions as an emergency landing strip for military aircraft!
It's another case of what became a perminent solution to a temporary problem that no one wants to let go even thought it has outlived its original purpose and turned into a monstrosity (Social Security for instance).
I'm all about having some trains. I'd take the train all the time. My dad is an airline captain and even though its free, I hate flying. Plus I hate his stupid commie labour union he's a representative for. EURORail kicks ass. AmTrak sucks ass. Not a lot that can be done about this. I am supposed to go to Boston in August to visit with a friend and see Dropkick Murphys. It'll be like, 7hrs and $190 each way if I take the train. I can get AirTran or something for $190 round trip and make it like, 2-3hrs probably total (i've not been up to Boston in ages, so I dont remeber. IT's like 9hrs if I drive).
I live out in the country in Virginia. It doesnt make sense to have busses or trains where I am. If I go over to Newport News or Norfolk, they have busses but they suck. I took the train from Richmond (Ashland, actually) to Norfolk freshman year (I'm a jr now). I had to get off at the end of the line in Newport News and then take a bloody bus. THhen bus back to Newport News and then train back. like, $80 round trip I think, but it took like 4hours (i could have made it in 2.5 tops if i had driven on the interstate), sucked ass, and the stale sandwhich cost like, $7.50.
Our trains here suck so bad right now that anyone has been on them think all trains suck. Thus, why bother upgrading? trains suck. European trains are nice, but the US and EU have a similar size population, economy, and we're still lareger and more spread out. You guys can pile in all together and go places. There aren't enough people in any one place trying to go to another place that trains really make sense. Maybe back in the 1800s when it was the only thing going. But nowadays it's like, why go from Richmond to Boston unles I have business or want to see my friends? It's just like Richmond otherwise, only maybe less suck-ass. It's not like, "hmm... i think i'll buy a ticket and go to Zurich this weekend!" Zurich is actually worth going to from Paris or London or Madrid, and vice versa just for fun. It's actualyl different. But if I'm on business my business wnats me there FAST and will fly me. Then rent me a car.
There is no real reason for train travel in the United States, even though it would be nice. I drove to Alaska from Yorktown one time. It was cool. THe train would have been better. But I doubt it will ever happen.
I think it's more of a "who cares? they're arabs," "who cares? they're muslims," or "who cares? they're foreigners." Frankly, I don't care what their story is. I'm just not interested. Kill 'em. I really don't give a shit.
But that'll just help Israel. We should send them back and leave the middle east. let them take their vengence on Israel who deserves it. We are there for Israel and no other reason. Not oil, not the honour of Bush 1. Neo-Cons are Zionist tools, every one of them. Just like all those Jewish Communists and Soviet leaders and spies.
So yeah, "who cares? they're foreigners." I really don't like or trust anyone from that area of the world. And nothing we do there is in our best interest if it doesn't involve the destruction of Israel, which is in the best interest of the whole world.
Women should just have more babies and fuck the foreigners. They have no right to Europe. And if they are brought in, they nor their projeny should ever be citizens. National Socialism has nothing to do with Marxism. Marxism needs open borders and shit to spread its filthy and disease. A Marxist country cannot stand if there is any industry at all. National Socialism can.
My grandfather was a Navy officer and pilot and stationed at Pearl Harbour. He was there. And he still believes to this day that FDR had foreknowledge of the attack. Considering FDR and Churchill were both undersecretaries of the Navy and Admiralty respectivly at the time of the Lucitania attack which got the United States into the first world war, after Zionist Jews offered to get the United States into the war if the British would promise the Jews Palestine, I find it fishy. Two world wars both of which we were brought into in attacks that Rosevelt and Churchil would have had dealings with. Thousands of Americans died in each situation.
Bin Laden has talked about both Israel and the Saudi bases. We should have neither. Frankly, I wish Israel would die a horrible death. But we need oil. But if we were not so concerened about Israel we could exercise power over the region with impunity. Or ignore it and just trade with them openly and fairly. But whereever there is trade, Jews will be found. So long as there are Jews.
neo-con Republicans are Jews and Bush is an Israeli puppet. Why do you think we are at war in the middle east? Not because Bin Laden hates our freedom. He said if we drop Israel, he'll leave us alone.
We are at war for the security of Israel and nothing else. This has become obvious to me now. Of course, I have even on here said as much, stating Israel is our ally and Iraq was funding bombing against them.
Then I realised Israel is not our ally. Thy even sunk one of our warships in the 1970s. We give them $10,000,000 a day which they never pay back, in addition to other loans and military equipment. Which they sell to China.
In fact, I don't even think the gas chamber holocaust shit ever happend. It's only claimed on the Soviet side. The Soviets would not let wester allies in to see it. It's been proven the gas chamber at Auschwitz I is not in its original state, but was an air raid shelter that the Soviets "turned back"(if it ever was) into a gas chamber to take photos of for the Nuremberg trial. Why would the Soviets do this? Because the Russian Revolution was anything but Russian. IT was instigated top down by Jews. Communism was invented by Jews (Marx in particular being the one to codify the beliefs).
Jews also invtented capitalism through their usuery and all. Capitalism and Communism are 2 sides of the same coin. Neither respects national borders or the people of the countries in which they opperate. They are both exploitive and oppressive. As they say : In Capitalism, man exploits man. In communism it's the other way around.
So yes, Neo-Cons are at fault. But they are NOT like Nazis. They are Zionists every one. And it would have been far better that the UNited States had eithe stayed out of the war, or sided with our German brothers (because Germans the largest white cultural group (and white being still 70% of the population) and they are like us) against the soviet communists.
Then there would be no Israel. There would be no islamic terrorism. there wuld have been no korean or vietnam wars. no afghan war. no CIA support of Bin Laden against the communits. No 9/11.
So do not dare to criticise National Socialism, because while not perfect it is the only economic system in which the people are not exploited. it's the only system where jobs stay in the country and cheep workers arent brought in to fill them at the expense of the people. and it was the only philosophy that ever stood a chance against the Marxist and Capitalist Zionists who are the cause of all the trouble in the world.
Slashdot Mirror
i think most of what destroys a tank is the rapid decompression caused by the round piercing the armour. the round already on impact shoots a jet of white-hot metal. that hopefully will ignight the amunition inside, but the decompression will kill or damage the people inside. I am not sure that a laser would cause rapid decompression. But i'm not a scientist.
Welth should be a limited resource. But now we have no gold or silver standard. we have no standard for hard money at all. Paper currency is worthless, and electronic currency even more so. Just because we can now make unlimited "money" doesn't mean that real welth -- stacks of the shiney stuff -- is unlimited. precious metals, gems, and real estate -- that's welth. Money is just money and it's not even that.
"LaFeyette, I have returned!" so fuck you and the frog you road in on.
Everybody needs a sidekick!
"fabric softener? so that's how those hip hop guys get all the babes!"
man... i had no idea some dumbass would make an automated service based on a comercial for a different product.
all your freebase are belong to us. make your time.
Stalin was not an ally of the United States, he was an ally of FDR who sucked ass. Also, I do not believe that we were ever in bed with Ho Chi Minh. Only Jane Fonda was. Prove that shit. THe rest, sure. Perhaps you should have used Bin Laden instead of "Uncle Ho" -- everyone already knows that is true.
part of the America First Party platform is that there should always be paper trail, and that e-voting is probably just altogether bad.
AFP is also pretty much the only conservative party in support of the working class, against illegal imigration, outsourcing, et cetera, instead of the interests of corporate internationalist oligarchs. Much better than stupid libertarian hippies anyway.
the vast majority of Soviet leaders, both in and out of Russia were Jews. somthing like 90% of pre-war communist agitators across Europe were Jews. Jews own the media and the banks in this country. The Israeli lobby owns Congress. There are 27 high ranking Jews in the current administration. There are not 20,000,000 Jews in the world and even before the holocaust, there never have been at any one time.
That is why no one criticises Soviet gulags. They were Jewish contraptions. Stalin was not a Jew. Trotsky was. Lenin was 1/4 Jewish. View this site:
http://www.heretical.com/miscellx/bolshies.html
There is a list of all the soviet leadership in the polit bureaus and all taht shit. See how many Jews? and there are not that many Jews. Even Kruschev was married to a Jew. His children were raised Jewish. He said "we will burry you from within," and he ment the Jewbolschevicks in this country.
Every convicted Soviet spy in the 40s and 50s were Jewish. Jews like Abbie Hoffman and Emma Goldman advocated anarchy. Jews like Charles Krauthammer and Paul Wolfowitz are responsible for "neo-conservatism" which I am sure you will hate.
So, no, I don't really give half a damn that Jews allegedly got "holocausted." In fact, I believe there is sufficiant evidence to point to the gas chambers as having been concoted by the Soviet Union and the evidence given up at Nuremburg (without the benefit of allowing western allies in to check the truthfulness) was all fraudulent. the Soviet Union was largely a Jewish creation, after all.
there can't BE gun CRIME without gun LAWS. No law, no crime.
There were crimes that happened to be committed with guns, but they would be no less illegal if with knives, baseball bats, or chainsaws.
A gun is a tool. It serves a purpose. Some people use them for good, others for ill. It's not the gun's fault. I have lots here and none of them has ever told me to go rob the ABC store.
diisidents are criminals in their countries. So, I suspect that you mean that terrorists do things which sane people in other countries would also consider criminal?
Unitarians are a cult. They have no political power. Like Branch Davidians. But then it's all terminology again I guess.
I guess the difference boils down to Provisional Sinn Fein wants a United Ireland. Republican Sinn Fein wants a federal ireland (each 9-county province (3 counties of Ulster are in the Republic) has a "state legislature" then sends representatives to Dublin). Fianna Fail and Fine Gael pay lip service to their fouding ideologies but just stick with the way things are.
Only, that is Ireland, not America. The point is all the parties that will ever get elected in this country in the near future suck ass, abuse the people, and all need to die horrible deaths.
then use the term Unitarians.
I respect the Federal system, although I believe the Anti-Federalst argument of those such as Patrick Henry was stronger and more correct.
A Nation is more the thing such as the "Cherokee Nation" -- that is, the people, being a distinct and separate group with an idenity and collective self-interest. The Country is where they live. The State is the political carapase which is supposed to protect the Nation and the Country.
We are a union of the several soverign States, although we, Americans, that is, the decendents of those who founded this country (for instance, I am in direct lineal decent of William Dawes -- a rider with Paul Revere) are the Nation (there are thus arguably different National groups here -- such as "mexican ameriacns" or "african americans" or jews). The whole chunk we claim is the Country.
So, use Unitarians instead. or Anti-Americans, as they are against the arraingment which has served us well and for which our forebearers fought and died. But the fact is, both those you label as "Nationalists" and "Internationalists," are internationalists in their policies and whatnot -- both sides are lead by rich oligarchs who would sell out their own mother to make a buck, let alone the American people. So fuck them.
there are no Nationalists in government.
Republicans seek "Free Trade" and a "Global Economy", abusing illegal immgration to get a slave class to work the jobs they cant ship over seas. They allow Israel to control our foreign policy.
Democrats want a "Global Culture" and a world government. They allow Israel to control the down-beating of the majority in America, with their so-called "equal rights" which are merely favours for minority and alien groups at the expense of the majority of americans, and "hate crimes" legistlation which seeks to limit freedom of speech. Britain's Race Relations Act is similar -- if even one minority or alien claims to be provoked by a BNP, National Front, or whatever rally, the cops will close it down. How is that Democracy? How is that fair? It's destroying Britain for Britons.
No, you cannot trust any politicians. Revolution is likely immenant. However, if you wish to be peaceful, I suggest looking into the Nationalist Movement. They are the only rightist movement to have won cases before the Supereme Court, advocate full democracy, majority rule, justice for all and favours for none.
Libertarians are hippies, constitutionalists are baptist scum. Greens are Commies. It's really the only choice to save America for Americans, remove foreign influence, oppose the war on constitutional grounds, secure our country against the real enemies and not the citizens, eliminate corrupt politicians, et cetera.
Even Linus has stated numerous times, for instance, in his essay for "Open Sources" that taking on Microsoft was not the goal. Hell, Linux wasn't even meant to replace UNIX. It's all just a happy accident.
BSD wasn't meant to replace anything. It was a project by a school to do stuff which got turned into a personal project to replace that in order that it could continue unhindred.
I really dont understand what this obsession is with "replacing" microsoft. Most people really don't care. Nothing is stopping you from doing what you're doing. Why try and stop them?
I fear the "hacker spirit" of learning and invention has been replaced by a generation of people who use Linux just to be "l3t0 k3wl" and hate on Microsoft instead of trying to make the software better, do neat things, and learn how the computer works. Its sad really. It also show a lack of disconnect with the real world in which real work must be done. Not everyone can sit around and hack up their system and play on the computer all day. Most people dont care. Windows 2000 Pro is actually not that bad. I have no problems with it, myself. I can do my work and then have fun. In high school (graduated '02), I spent more time with my computer in parts and recompiling and tweeking shit than I did in a word processor and working. My grades suffered accordingly. Of course, AbiWord was nothing to write home about then, OO didn't exist and StarOffic wasn't "Free" as in no money unitl I was a senior, iirc.
But still, its a little irrational and vitriolic, all this "lets conqurer MS!!" not that I didn't engage in it myself when I was like, 14.
Hitler was ethnically German. The difference is more or less "where you born in new york or virginia?" It's all America, and that's all Germanic territory.
in National Socialism, all infrastructure which is common to the people is nationalized -- so power, water, roads, rail, airline, et etera. health care and schools and junk too I guess.
Then there are small private enterprises -- your bakers, cobblers, tailors and junk.
Citizens are entitled to all public services, but are required in turn to serve the public.
Non citizens get whatever's the leftovers because they don't belong anyway and need to go away.
National Socialism is actually rather nice. Except this pesky "Third Reich" experiment at it went horribly wrong. or did it?
http://vho.org/GB/c/DC/gcgvcole.html
David Cole, a Jew, says the gassings never happened and are fabricated by the Jewish Bolshevick Soviet Union.
True or not, holocaust or not, National Socailism is nice. So long as people stay on their own side of the street. Moochers and parasites must be dealt with, of course. But citizens are rather independent outside of their required service (military).
Dude, capitalism is about getting as much money as possible and screw everybody else. Competition is only a happy biproduct that temporarily benefits the victims of capitalism until a monopoly is acheived and innovation stops.
Of course, communism is stupid and starves millions of people to death with its retardedness.
The moral of the story is no economic system is good.
the interstate highway system was developed because of the Cold War. You can drive all your trucks and tanks at once instead of loading only a few on trains. ALso, one mile in 4 (or 5? i dont remember right now) is straight. The interstate highway also functions as an emergency landing strip for military aircraft!
It's another case of what became a perminent solution to a temporary problem that no one wants to let go even thought it has outlived its original purpose and turned into a monstrosity (Social Security for instance).
I'm all about having some trains. I'd take the train all the time. My dad is an airline captain and even though its free, I hate flying. Plus I hate his stupid commie labour union he's a representative for. EURORail kicks ass. AmTrak sucks ass. Not a lot that can be done about this. I am supposed to go to Boston in August to visit with a friend and see Dropkick Murphys. It'll be like, 7hrs and $190 each way if I take the train. I can get AirTran or something for $190 round trip and make it like, 2-3hrs probably total (i've not been up to Boston in ages, so I dont remeber. IT's like 9hrs if I drive).
I live out in the country in Virginia. It doesnt make sense to have busses or trains where I am. If I go over to Newport News or Norfolk, they have busses but they suck. I took the train from Richmond (Ashland, actually) to Norfolk freshman year (I'm a jr now). I had to get off at the end of the line in Newport News and then take a bloody bus. THhen bus back to Newport News and then train back. like, $80 round trip I think, but it took like 4hours (i could have made it in 2.5 tops if i had driven on the interstate), sucked ass, and the stale sandwhich cost like, $7.50.
Our trains here suck so bad right now that anyone has been on them think all trains suck. Thus, why bother upgrading? trains suck. European trains are nice, but the US and EU have a similar size population, economy, and we're still lareger and more spread out. You guys can pile in all together and go places. There aren't enough people in any one place trying to go to another place that trains really make sense. Maybe back in the 1800s when it was the only thing going. But nowadays it's like, why go from Richmond to Boston unles I have business or want to see my friends? It's just like Richmond otherwise, only maybe less suck-ass. It's not like, "hmm... i think i'll buy a ticket and go to Zurich this weekend!" Zurich is actually worth going to from Paris or London or Madrid, and vice versa just for fun. It's actualyl different. But if I'm on business my business wnats me there FAST and will fly me. Then rent me a car.
There is no real reason for train travel in the United States, even though it would be nice. I drove to Alaska from Yorktown one time. It was cool. THe train would have been better. But I doubt it will ever happen.
I think it's more of a "who cares? they're arabs," "who cares? they're muslims," or "who cares? they're foreigners." Frankly, I don't care what their story is. I'm just not interested. Kill 'em. I really don't give a shit.
But that'll just help Israel. We should send them back and leave the middle east. let them take their vengence on Israel who deserves it. We are there for Israel and no other reason. Not oil, not the honour of Bush 1. Neo-Cons are Zionist tools, every one of them. Just like all those Jewish Communists and Soviet leaders and spies.
So yeah, "who cares? they're foreigners." I really don't like or trust anyone from that area of the world. And nothing we do there is in our best interest if it doesn't involve the destruction of Israel, which is in the best interest of the whole world.
Women should just have more babies and fuck the foreigners. They have no right to Europe. And if they are brought in, they nor their projeny should ever be citizens. National Socialism has nothing to do with Marxism. Marxism needs open borders and shit to spread its filthy and disease. A Marxist country cannot stand if there is any industry at all. National Socialism can. My grandfather was a Navy officer and pilot and stationed at Pearl Harbour. He was there. And he still believes to this day that FDR had foreknowledge of the attack. Considering FDR and Churchill were both undersecretaries of the Navy and Admiralty respectivly at the time of the Lucitania attack which got the United States into the first world war, after Zionist Jews offered to get the United States into the war if the British would promise the Jews Palestine, I find it fishy. Two world wars both of which we were brought into in attacks that Rosevelt and Churchil would have had dealings with. Thousands of Americans died in each situation. Bin Laden has talked about both Israel and the Saudi bases. We should have neither. Frankly, I wish Israel would die a horrible death. But we need oil. But if we were not so concerened about Israel we could exercise power over the region with impunity. Or ignore it and just trade with them openly and fairly. But whereever there is trade, Jews will be found. So long as there are Jews.
neo-con Republicans are Jews and Bush is an Israeli puppet. Why do you think we are at war in the middle east? Not because Bin Laden hates our freedom. He said if we drop Israel, he'll leave us alone.
We are at war for the security of Israel and nothing else. This has become obvious to me now. Of course, I have even on here said as much, stating Israel is our ally and Iraq was funding bombing against them.
Then I realised Israel is not our ally. Thy even sunk one of our warships in the 1970s. We give them $10,000,000 a day which they never pay back, in addition to other loans and military equipment. Which they sell to China.
In fact, I don't even think the gas chamber holocaust shit ever happend. It's only claimed on the Soviet side. The Soviets would not let wester allies in to see it. It's been proven the gas chamber at Auschwitz I is not in its original state, but was an air raid shelter that the Soviets "turned back"(if it ever was) into a gas chamber to take photos of for the Nuremberg trial. Why would the Soviets do this? Because the Russian Revolution was anything but Russian. IT was instigated top down by Jews. Communism was invented by Jews (Marx in particular being the one to codify the beliefs).
Jews also invtented capitalism through their usuery and all. Capitalism and Communism are 2 sides of the same coin. Neither respects national borders or the people of the countries in which they opperate. They are both exploitive and oppressive. As they say : In Capitalism, man exploits man. In communism it's the other way around.
So yes, Neo-Cons are at fault. But they are NOT like Nazis. They are Zionists every one. And it would have been far better that the UNited States had eithe stayed out of the war, or sided with our German brothers (because Germans the largest white cultural group (and white being still 70% of the population) and they are like us) against the soviet communists.
Then there would be no Israel. There would be no islamic terrorism. there wuld have been no korean or vietnam wars. no afghan war. no CIA support of Bin Laden against the communits. No 9/11.
So do not dare to criticise National Socialism, because while not perfect it is the only economic system in which the people are not exploited. it's the only system where jobs stay in the country and cheep workers arent brought in to fill them at the expense of the people. and it was the only philosophy that ever stood a chance against the Marxist and Capitalist Zionists who are the cause of all the trouble in the world.
no, it was a contest against some other guy, and all the battle was his indvidual glory.
You can find those at Wal-Mart.
Beowulf swam the North Sea!! In chainmail! fighting sea monsters with a sword!
this can't be all that more difficult
In case anyone hasn't looked at a map lately, let me remind you that Japan and Korea are small. The United States is fucking huge.
Canada is also fucking huge, but has a lot less people than the US and they live in a rather nice line.
Wireing the US is expensive, requires a lot of cable, and a lot of time. It'll get done eventually.