One need not be a "homophobe" to have serious reservations about the ethics of homosexual practice.
Yes you do. Please, if you have any rational basis as to why it is immoral to be gay then please enlighten me. Also, when you describe being homosexual as a 'practice' you are subscribing to the line that being homosexual is something you do and thus something you CHOOSE to do, which is where ethical and moralistic judgements are born. What people like you cannot apparently fathom is that being homosexual does not just mean ass fucking. To you, being homosexual as opposed to being heterosexual is simply a matter of choosing between ass fucking and pussy fucking. This is an absurd notion. Please, get your mind out of the gutter and stop thinking about ass fucking when adults are discussing important issues like freedom of religion and equal rights.
One need not be a "homophobe" to feel that marriage is an institution designed to provide for the having and rearing of children.
Valid argument, but just because you 'feel' that marriage is an istitution deesigned for having and rearing children doesn't make it so.
One need not be a "homophobe" in order to feel that a two-parent, heterosexaul household provides children with the best opportunity of developing positive relationships with men AND women.
Yes it does, unless you can cite real and rational evidence to back that up. I doubt that you can do so with legitamate sources. Otherwise, your notion that being raised by homosexuals is 'bad for the children' is based purely on your antipathy to homosexuals... which is the definition of homophobia. (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Homophobia)
Slashdot Mirror
Fat lot of good this software will do for a pc that can't even boot into windows. They need a version that you can burn onto a cd and boot from.
One need not be a "homophobe" to have serious reservations about the ethics of homosexual practice.
... which is the definition of homophobia. (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Homophobia)
Yes you do. Please, if you have any rational basis as to why it is immoral to be gay then please enlighten me. Also, when you describe being homosexual as a 'practice' you are subscribing to the line that being homosexual is something you do and thus something you CHOOSE to do, which is where ethical and moralistic judgements are born. What people like you cannot apparently fathom is that being homosexual does not just mean ass fucking. To you, being homosexual as opposed to being heterosexual is simply a matter of choosing between ass fucking and pussy fucking. This is an absurd notion. Please, get your mind out of the gutter and stop thinking about ass fucking when adults are discussing important issues like freedom of religion and equal rights.
One need not be a "homophobe" to feel that marriage is an institution designed to provide for the having and rearing of children.
Valid argument, but just because you 'feel' that marriage is an istitution deesigned for having and rearing children doesn't make it so.
One need not be a "homophobe" in order to feel that a two-parent, heterosexaul household provides children with the best opportunity of developing positive relationships with men AND women.
Yes it does, unless you can cite real and rational evidence to back that up. I doubt that you can do so with legitamate sources. Otherwise, your notion that being raised by homosexuals is 'bad for the children' is based purely on your antipathy to homosexuals
(this is a duplicate post)