If the authentication protocol relies on the client not spoofing another client, then the authentication protocol if profoundly broken. I don't see why this specific phone is required; you should be able to build hardware from scratch to do this or even do most of it in software.
There are 3 ways to design a standard: the right way, the wrong way, and the Microsoft way (which is kinda like the wrong way, only with greater vendor lock-in.)
It is not knowing the subject better than your students that makes you a good teach. My father used to say "All need to do to teach a class is to read the textbook before the students do." The most important thing is understanding your target audience. Which of course is something the board of education never bothers to test for, isn't it? Half of all new teachers wash out within the first few years because they think if they just present the material, the students will magically absorb it. The ones that succeed are the ones that understand how the students they are attempt to education actually think. For teaching elementary school, I'd far prefer a teacher who understands kids well over a teacher who understands probability and statistics well.
D is obviously the only correct answer. Yes, it is more properly 205 milliliters * (0.4 cups/100 milliliters), and some engineering professors would take points off for not having the units.
"But this other kid has it! It's not fair!!"...and so it goes. I'm not seeing the problem here. I tell my kid: "I made an arbitrary and capricious decision; I said no, and no amount of whining is going to change my mind. It is just going to make me angry. And trust me, kid, you won't like me when I'm angry!" In other words, I don't care if every other kid in the neighborhood is stoned out of their mind on primo bud, I'm still not buying the kid a bong! I've even been so cruel as to not let her watch Family Guy! But the thing about kids whining is, they have a really short attention span... Once you convince them that whining won't change anything, in about 30 seconds there little minds will be off on some other subject and they will be perfectly happy. The mistake you are making is thinking you have an obligation to reason with them. You don't! You're bigger than they are, and you can kick their ass anytime you feel like it! End of discussion.
All laws are based on the precept "do no harm", or in basketball terms "No harm, no foul". We we consider "morality" is based on a different precept "Don't piss God off". Although most harmful acts are also considered to be sins, other sins cannot be scientifically proven to be harmful. So, while there is some overlap, Morality and Law are two distinctly different things.
home addresses of people who visited or worked at the White House. Gee, I can't imagine who would be interested in this information. After all, it's not like anybody in the White House at that time was a well-known philanderer with a brilliant but opportunistic wife who might want to track down some of his late-night "visitors", is it? Maybe it's just our new Secretary of State working on her enemies list. I'm not sure 1 TByte is enough to record all of the bimbos, but at least it's a start.
...assist parents in keeping these harmful video games out of the hands of children. How about a bill to assist parents in keeping that harmful McDonald's food out of the hands of children? Childhood obesity does a lot more damage than video games! After that, can we work on a bill to keep television remotes out of the hands of wives and girlfriends? I'm pretty sure that is the number one cause of domestic violence!
Which airport and flights would you think people would be willing to fly out of?> I don't know... I hear the line at the San Francisco Airport with the mandatory body cavity searches is pretty popular!;-) And please don't take the original post so seriously -- I certainly didn't. While it is true that you really do always have a choice, there really are not any other viable choices for intercontinental travel, unless you have enough money to charter your own jet.
I assume that part of the debate is that women are afraid that if men can pay to have causal sex that no one will get married? Just paying for the casual sex turns out to be a whole lot cheaper than getting married and being responsible for all your partners past, present, and future credit card bills, regardless of whether or not they put out! They very well should be afraid, since paying for casual sex is the only rational choice!;-) (Why yes, I'm married... how can you tell?)
...then get all huffy when a machine that shows a handful of same sex guards what you'd look like in fashionable clothes. Same sex?!? Personally, I'd rather have women checking out my package than men of unknown sexual preferences. Although both groups are pretty annoying when they point and laugh, then call all their coworkers over while shouting "Hey, get a load of this!"
As far as separate lines, I didn't even know which line to get in when I flew. But I suspect if they had a "Clothed" and "Non-clothed" line, it would be a lot more obvious!
Eisenhower was not a socialist, but he did get us into the Vietnam war, the bastard! Obama is not a socialist; he is a middle-of-the-road pragmatist with a weak spot for social justice. The Democrats tend to lean more towards socialism, while the Republicans tend to lean more towards fascism. But no true socialist or fascist could ever get elected (I hope!). As a (moderate) libertarian, I have been opposed to socialized medicine for many years. Lately, I have come to consider that if done correctly, it might be the least-bad alternative we have available, since American businesses simply cannot afford the current costs of health insurance. "Done correctly" means using the power of the government to standardize and drive down costs. It also means doing something like the Oregon Health plan: prioritize all procedures, giving much more weight to preventative medicine. Then draw a cut line somewhere based on funding available and simply refuse to pay for any procedures below the cut line. Again, not an ideal situation, but the only way I can think of to make it work without bankrupting the country.
In addition, you don't have to pay to advertise on craigslist, which much really piss off existing newspapers, yellow pages, etc. (Craigslist only charges fees to commercial entities like employers advertising for employees or apartment managers advertising for tenants. Even then, they only charge fees in categories that were flooded with ads when they were free in an attempt to limit the number of ads.)
I check the w4m section very rarely, and then only to make sure my wife isn't placing any ads.;-) If you are saying it has gone to hell after Craigslist shut down the "adult" section, then all I can say is that I am not surprised.
I personally don't think states should bar women from making ends meet. If you are unmarried and not spreading disease, who are you doing wrong? The wives and girlfriends of your customers? I agree, it should be legal, but only if it is a matter of public record who the sex service customers are. If you don't care who knows you are paying for it, and nobody else cares, then I don't see any problem in a consensual business transaction. Take away the stigma of criminality, and the workers would be much more likely to report coercion, thus less exploitation would occur.
I don't know how the adult/erotic services was ever allowed. I figure they are facilitating a crime, and illegal industry, whether explicitly knowing or not.Where ads are free, if they don't have an explicit categories for whores to advertise, then the whores will spam all the other categories! Finding ads for sex services in the dating section is considerably more annoying then finding them in section where you have to be explicitly looking for whores to be viewing the first place. Sorta like being propositioned in church, it is somewhat disturbing! Giving the sex services their own place actually minimizes the impact on craigslist customers, and minimizes minors accidentally stumbling upon the material.
It's about 2% of US internet traffic, no duh it's got a few hookers on it. How true! About 80% of internet traffic is porn, no doubt it's got a few hookers in it too!
Slashdot Mirror
"The Yellow Knight" just didn't have the same ring to it...
If the authentication protocol relies on the client not spoofing another client, then the authentication protocol if profoundly broken. I don't see why this specific phone is required; you should be able to build hardware from scratch to do this or even do most of it in software.
There are 3 ways to design a standard: the right way, the wrong way, and the Microsoft way (which is kinda like the wrong way, only with greater vendor lock-in.)
I find paregoric to be much more effective. Just give the kid the whole bottle, and you can finally get a well-deserved rest!
"Is drugs the answer?" No, teaching better grammar is the answer!
Sounds more like Joey Ramone to me!
It is not knowing the subject better than your students that makes you a good teach. My father used to say "All need to do to teach a class is to read the textbook before the students do." The most important thing is understanding your target audience. Which of course is something the board of education never bothers to test for, isn't it? Half of all new teachers wash out within the first few years because they think if they just present the material, the students will magically absorb it. The ones that succeed are the ones that understand how the students they are attempt to education actually think. For teaching elementary school, I'd far prefer a teacher who understands kids well over a teacher who understands probability and statistics well.
D is obviously the only correct answer. Yes, it is more properly 205 milliliters * (0.4 cups/100 milliliters), and some engineering professors would take points off for not having the units.
It sure beats the "Stop coming by here or I'm calling the police!" signs the women I've dated usually put up!
"But this other kid has it! It's not fair!!" ...and so it goes. I'm not seeing the problem here. I tell my kid: "I made an arbitrary and capricious decision; I said no, and no amount of whining is going to change my mind. It is just going to make me angry. And trust me, kid, you won't like me when I'm angry!" In other words, I don't care if every other kid in the neighborhood is stoned out of their mind on primo bud, I'm still not buying the kid a bong! I've even been so cruel as to not let her watch Family Guy! But the thing about kids whining is, they have a really short attention span... Once you convince them that whining won't change anything, in about 30 seconds there little minds will be off on some other subject and they will be perfectly happy. The mistake you are making is thinking you have an obligation to reason with them. You don't! You're bigger than they are, and you can kick their ass anytime you feel like it! End of discussion.
All laws are based on the precept "do no harm", or in basketball terms "No harm, no foul". We we consider "morality" is based on a different precept "Don't piss God off". Although most harmful acts are also considered to be sins, other sins cannot be scientifically proven to be harmful. So, while there is some overlap, Morality and Law are two distinctly different things.
4 milligrams of ram isn't even enough to make a lamb sandwich, let alone scream.
home addresses of people who visited or worked at the White House. Gee, I can't imagine who would be interested in this information. After all, it's not like anybody in the White House at that time was a well-known philanderer with a brilliant but opportunistic wife who might want to track down some of his late-night "visitors", is it? Maybe it's just our new Secretary of State working on her enemies list. I'm not sure 1 TByte is enough to record all of the bimbos, but at least it's a start.
...assist parents in keeping these harmful video games out of the hands of children. How about a bill to assist parents in keeping that harmful McDonald's food out of the hands of children? Childhood obesity does a lot more damage than video games! After that, can we work on a bill to keep television remotes out of the hands of wives and girlfriends? I'm pretty sure that is the number one cause of domestic violence!
Which airport and flights would you think people would be willing to fly out of?> I don't know... I hear the line at the San Francisco Airport with the mandatory body cavity searches is pretty popular! ;-) And please don't take the original post so seriously -- I certainly didn't. While it is true that you really do always have a choice, there really are not any other viable choices for intercontinental travel, unless you have enough money to charter your own jet.
I assume that part of the debate is that women are afraid that if men can pay to have causal sex that no one will get married? Just paying for the casual sex turns out to be a whole lot cheaper than getting married and being responsible for all your partners past, present, and future credit card bills, regardless of whether or not they put out! They very well should be afraid, since paying for casual sex is the only rational choice! ;-) (Why yes, I'm married... how can you tell?)
...then get all huffy when a machine that shows a handful of same sex guards what you'd look like in fashionable clothes. Same sex?!? Personally, I'd rather have women checking out my package than men of unknown sexual preferences. Although both groups are pretty annoying when they point and laugh, then call all their coworkers over while shouting "Hey, get a load of this!"
As far as separate lines, I didn't even know which line to get in when I flew. But I suspect if they had a "Clothed" and "Non-clothed" line, it would be a lot more obvious!
Eisenhower was not a socialist, but he did get us into the Vietnam war, the bastard! Obama is not a socialist; he is a middle-of-the-road pragmatist with a weak spot for social justice. The Democrats tend to lean more towards socialism, while the Republicans tend to lean more towards fascism. But no true socialist or fascist could ever get elected (I hope!). As a (moderate) libertarian, I have been opposed to socialized medicine for many years. Lately, I have come to consider that if done correctly, it might be the least-bad alternative we have available, since American businesses simply cannot afford the current costs of health insurance. "Done correctly" means using the power of the government to standardize and drive down costs. It also means doing something like the Oregon Health plan: prioritize all procedures, giving much more weight to preventative medicine. Then draw a cut line somewhere based on funding available and simply refuse to pay for any procedures below the cut line. Again, not an ideal situation, but the only way I can think of to make it work without bankrupting the country.
In addition, you don't have to pay to advertise on craigslist, which much really piss off existing newspapers, yellow pages, etc. (Craigslist only charges fees to commercial entities like employers advertising for employees or apartment managers advertising for tenants. Even then, they only charge fees in categories that were flooded with ads when they were free in an attempt to limit the number of ads.)
I check the w4m section very rarely, and then only to make sure my wife isn't placing any ads. ;-) If you are saying it has gone to hell after Craigslist shut down the "adult" section, then all I can say is that I am not surprised.
I personally don't think states should bar women from making ends meet. If you are unmarried and not spreading disease, who are you doing wrong? The wives and girlfriends of your customers? I agree, it should be legal, but only if it is a matter of public record who the sex service customers are. If you don't care who knows you are paying for it, and nobody else cares, then I don't see any problem in a consensual business transaction. Take away the stigma of criminality, and the workers would be much more likely to report coercion, thus less exploitation would occur.
I don't know how the adult/erotic services was ever allowed. I figure they are facilitating a crime, and illegal industry, whether explicitly knowing or not.Where ads are free, if they don't have an explicit categories for whores to advertise, then the whores will spam all the other categories! Finding ads for sex services in the dating section is considerably more annoying then finding them in section where you have to be explicitly looking for whores to be viewing the first place. Sorta like being propositioned in church, it is somewhat disturbing! Giving the sex services their own place actually minimizes the impact on craigslist customers, and minimizes minors accidentally stumbling upon the material.
You mean it's difficult to compete with "free"?!? Microsoft doesn't think so...
It's about 2% of US internet traffic, no duh it's got a few hookers on it. How true! About 80% of internet traffic is porn, no doubt it's got a few hookers in it too!
When will McMaster and Buckmaster stop baiting each other?