Slashdot Mirror


Rutgers Attempts Robot Atlantic Crossing

RUCOOL writes "Rutgers University students and staff launched a Slocum glider AUV in an attempt to be the first such vehicle to cross the Atlantic Ocean. Progress so far is good, but it will be a long 6- to 9-month journey. Status as well as other information can be tracked here. Media links can be found in the lower left section of page, among images, and storyline blogs." And Google Earth fans can track the vehicle's progress, too.

67 comments

  1. In Other News... by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 4, Funny

    The U.S. Navy has developed autonomous long range torpedo technology. In a completely unrelated article, Rutgers students announce that they have lost all contact with their AUV and have offered no explanation as to why....

    1. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would actually be a hilarious prank by the navy, i think id even forgive them for wasting my tax dollars on a torpedo.

    2. Re:In Other News... by grcumb · · Score: 4, Funny

      The U.S. Navy has developed autonomous long range torpedo technology. In a completely unrelated article, Rutgers students announce that they have lost all contact with their AUV and have offered no explanation as to why....

      "It was worth the risk," said Rutgers spokesman. "No price is too high if it finally gets us out of New Jersey."

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    3. Re:In Other News... by bdp · · Score: 1

      All you need to do is arm that glider, and it is an autonomous long range torpedo.

    4. Re:In Other News... by skelterjohn · · Score: 1

      Except gliders move at about 1 foot per second. They move through small changes in buoyancy combined with orientation changes.

      Makes me think of the scene in Austin Powers, where the steamroller is running over the minions.

    5. Re:In Other News... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      If it's silent and very difficult to pick up with radar, and looks like a large fish on sonar, what does it matter how long it takes to get there? Hell, you could have a bunch of them schmoozing around the ocean as an analogue to the 'mutually assured destruction' bombers circling the Arctic (are they still up there? >.> ) just with a longer delay between bust and kaboom.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    6. Re:In Other News... by Zigmun_Barsac · · Score: 1

      It's been done. On August 11, 2003, a model airplane designed by famous aeromodeller Maynard Hill successfully navigated its way from Newfoundland to Ireland. In fact, a group from the university of Washington did it in 1998 with an autonomous aircraft but it weighed more than the allowed weight for a model aircraft. The Rutgers group is doing it underwater, but they are not nearly the first. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/08/0805_020805_transatlantic.html Zigmun

  2. Xcom by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I saw the google earth map, I had this overwhelming urge to send out subs to intercept it.

    1. Re:Xcom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no engineering details on their site.

      Is it electic?

    2. Re:Xcom by orsty3001 · · Score: 1

      I'm just waiting for something to eat it.

    3. Re:Xcom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
  3. Arrrrrr... by liquidsunshine · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet it gets intercepted by pirates. Watch the parts end up on eBay in 6-9 months.

  4. Better Headline by offrdbandit · · Score: 5, Funny

    In First Autonomous Act, Robot Flees New Jersey

    1. Re:Better Headline by Thornburg · · Score: 1

      You've already got +5, but I wanted to say:

      That made me laugh out loud, and posts of Slashdot very seldom have that effect.

    2. Re:Better Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funniest thing I have read in long time.

  5. Scarlet Knight by GMThomas · · Score: 1

    Who the hell decided to call it the "Scarlet Knight?" It's freakin' yellow!

    --
    You are now manually breathing.
    1. Re:Scarlet Knight by vertinox · · Score: 3, Informative

      Its the universities mascot.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    2. Re:Scarlet Knight by camperdave · · Score: 1
      Who the hell decided to call it the "Scarlet Knight?" It's freakin' yellow!

      The Blue Raja: I'm a superhero, mother.
      Blue Raja's mother: A superhero?
      The Blue Raja: An effete British superhero, to be precise. I am pilfering your tableware because I hurl it. I hurl it with a deadly accuracy. The Blue Raja is my name. And yes, I know I don't wear much blue and I speak in a British accent, but if you know your history it really does make perfect sense.

      Perhaps you just don't know the history behind the name. I know I don't.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:Scarlet Knight by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      "The Yellow Knight" just didn't have the same ring to it...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re:Scarlet Knight by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Umm... how about... "The Yellow Submarine"?

      Or... I mean... Woooshh. ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    5. Re:Scarlet Knight by Jens+Egon · · Score: 1

      Would you really want to live in that thing?

  6. 6-9 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps I'm misreading this...

    Latest Glider Data
    As of: May 21, 2009 16:12 GMT
    Latitude
    37.4 ÂN
    Longitude
    55.3 ÂW
    Days at Sea
    24
    Distance
    2,267 km
    Water Speed
    0.43 m/s

    It's been gone for 24 days, and it is 29.5% done with its trip. It still has 917 of 1000 units of energy in it's battery.

    Is the mid and end trip going to be significantly longer? If not, then shouldn't it be done in 2 months?

    1. Re:6-9 months? by B1oodAnge1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      We will soon be exiting the Gulf Stream which means things will start to move a lot slower and many more challenges will be thrust upon us.

      from http://rucool.marine.rutgers.edu/atlantic/

      also see here for an explanation of how it moves:
      http://rucool.marine.rutgers.edu/atlantic/about_gliders.html

      --
      RUGBYRUGBYRUGBY
  7. Slocum by inKubus · · Score: 3, Funny

    It'll be much better when they invent the "Fastcum" glider. That will probably drop the trip down to 1 month instead of 6-9.

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
    1. Re:Slocum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to cum fast and hard and then get the hell outta dodge.

    2. Re:Slocum by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      They made a version like that, but found it less satisfying.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  8. Robots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
  9. Caught in a Net by Fuseboy · · Score: 1

    The Slocum page refers to 'fleets' of these autonomous vehicles being practical because of their low cost. But in any given area of interest, how long before they get caught in a fishing net?

    What are the legalities of fishing someone else's autonomous vehicle out of the sea? When can you deem such a thing 'abandoned'?

    1. Re:Caught in a Net by PagosaSam · · Score: 1

      Damn it, another robot! Throw it back... I want a tuna!

      --
      :q! Oh crap, not again...
    2. Re:Caught in a Net by gringofrijolero · · Score: 1

      Our tuna is Robot Safe

      --
      Todos mis movimientos están friamente calculados
  10. What about a payload? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Informative

    Y'know, like a few kg of coke.

     

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:What about a payload? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      "Informative"...only on /. ;p

      Though TBH I actually would be surprised if similar things wouldn't be used already, or planned to be used at least.

      Unless...it haven't really yet occured to people wishing for covert means of transport, in which case perhaps we should be a bit quiet about it, giving time for means of detection to improve...

      I actually was thinking about building small autonomous boat, solar powered, just for fun; guess I decided to keep playing with ground vehicles also until swimming ones will be common enough that mine won't have much chance of attracting attention of people I wouldn't want to deal with...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  11. Robotic 'Firsts' by Anenome · · Score: 1

    I think this is going to become a growing phenomena, that of news of what robots can do and are doing. Just imagine it: first robot to cross the Atlantic! It's like Charles Lindbergh all over again. We can have first robot to fly around the world. First robot to climb Everest. First completely robotic hamburger joint (destined to put McDonald's out of business, and several others-- or would McDonald's buy the company). First robot to drive from LA to NY. First robot to reach the North / South pole. First robot to swim the English Channel. First translation assistant/secretary robot (protocol droid?).

    Man it's good to be alive right now ^_^ You'll be sure to read many of these stories in my upcoming Novel(s) :)

    --
    "I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist"
    1. Re:Robotic 'Firsts' by inKubus · · Score: 1

      Robots already fly around the world quite a bit. See Predator, UAV, etc.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    2. Re:Robotic 'Firsts' by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      First robot to intentionally kill a human.

      First robot to kill a hundred humans.

      First robot to single handedly wipe out an entire city of humans.

      First robot to kill a human while fueled entirely by the corpses of previous humans it killed.

      The list goes on and on!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:Robotic 'Firsts' by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      Hey, hot mamma! Wanna kill all humans?

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    4. Re:Robotic 'Firsts' by Spaham · · Score: 1

      unfortunately they're closer to drones than robots.
      They don't make any decisions, they're piloted by undergrads.
      Next step WILL be robots, not this one !

    5. Re:Robotic 'Firsts' by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Not autonomously.

    6. Re:Robotic 'Firsts' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First robot to kill a human while fueled entirely by the corpses of previous humans it killed.

      I actually have an idea how to start this development: That would be a really cool robot to eradicate invasive species, e.g. as one of these gliders in the Great Lakes "eating" zebra mussels, or to up the challenge, roaming Australia, eating rabbits.

    7. Re:Robotic 'Firsts' by FoxDude0486 · · Score: 1

      Those sound more like Achievements. Will they be using the Steam client for updates?

    8. Re:Robotic 'Firsts' by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      There's already a precedent in the slug-eating robot. I don't see any articles later than 2001. My guess is it turned out that making a robot that plucks slugs from your garden without destroying your garden vegetables in the process was harder than it seemed. Obviously the human-eating robot wouldn't have that problem.

      I gotta say I'm glad this seemed to go nowhere, and I hope it wasn't picked up by DARPA or something. The guys making Asimo could crack jokes about how it'll become the Terminator and not sound like insane fools since Asimo is unlikely to decide it must destroy humanity. But to actually design a robot that consumes organic matter, which is only a step away from craves, is just 50s-sci-fi-scientist crazy.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  12. Re tasking by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The small relative cost and the ability to operate multiple vehicles with minimal personnel and infrastructure will enable small fleets of gliders to study and map the dynamic (temporal and spatial) features of subsurface coastal waters around the clock and around the calendar.

    The small relative cost and the ability to operate multiple vehicles with minimal personnel and infrastructure will enable large fleets of gliders to transport many small loads of contraband through coastal waters around the clock and around the calendar.

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    1. Re:Re tasking by SwordsmanLuke · · Score: 1

      They're not entirely subtle. If spotted (and if you're using them for contraband, they will be spotted) it wouldn't be hard at all to a) follow them back to the recipient or b) shoot them down. The latter seems more likely to me, since there are more addicts, competing drug lords and rednecks than there are DEA officers.

      --
      Any plan which depends on a fundamental change in human behavior is doomed from the start.
    2. Re:Re tasking by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 4, Funny

      They're not entirely subtle. If spotted (and if you're using them for contraband, they will be spotted) it wouldn't be hard at all to a) follow them back to the recipient or b) shoot them down.

      You do understand that they operate underwater, right? Mostly, stuff that's underwater is kind of hard to see and even harder to "shoot down."

    3. Re:Re tasking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do understand the United States has had a very significant interest in underwater vehicles approaching it's shores, right?

    4. Re:Re tasking by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2, Informative

      You do understand the United States has had a very significant interest in underwater vehicles approaching it's shores, right?

      Indeed they do. But I'd imagine these things are pretty quiet.

      FTFA:

      [...] underwater gliders move around by changing their buoyancy, that is they change their density such that they alternate between more dense and less dense than the surrounding ocean water. This change in buoyancy causes the glider to rise and sink in the ocean. The glider changes its density by moving a small piston forward and back that increases and decreases its volume. You may remember that you can calculate the density of an object by taking its mass and dividing that by the object's volume. Since the mass of the glider remains constant, all we need to do is change its volume. A small change in volume (about a half cup of water) is all the glider needs to change its density enough to rise and sink in the ocean.

      I would imagine these things are pretty quiet. Run them about 50 feet underwater and I doubt the government would be able to hear them.

    5. Re:Re tasking by SwordsmanLuke · · Score: 1

      Whoops. That'll teach me not to RTFA. I just saw UAV and assumed Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. 8^)

      --
      Any plan which depends on a fundamental change in human behavior is doomed from the start.
    6. Re:Re tasking by getto+man+d · · Score: 1

      You do understand the United States has had a very significant interest in underwater vehicles approaching it's shores, right?

      Indeed they do. But I'd imagine these things are pretty quiet.

      FTFA:

      [...] underwater gliders move around by changing their buoyancy, that is they change their density such that they alternate between more dense and less dense than the surrounding ocean water. This change in buoyancy causes the glider to rise and sink in the ocean. The glider changes its density by moving a small piston forward and back that increases and decreases its volume. You may remember that you can calculate the density of an object by taking its mass and dividing that by the object's volume. Since the mass of the glider remains constant, all we need to do is change its volume. A small change in volume (about a half cup of water) is all the glider needs to change its density enough to rise and sink in the ocean.

      I would imagine these things are pretty quiet. Run them about 50 feet underwater and I doubt the government would be able to hear them.

      Not too quiet. To determine navigation AUVs usually use forms of sonar. That and since this is an "experiment" it should have a pinger - other commercial scientific AUVs do so you can recover if there is a glitch.

  13. Great. by Nesman64 · · Score: 1

    Next we'll hear that this is being combined with the robot soldiers to fight pirates.

    --
    coffee | nose > keyboard
  14. Who owns it? by the_other_chewey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember discussions around similar projects that all have a common problem: In international waters,
    unmanned seacraft or floating objects are considered flotsam and belong to whoever gets on board or fishes
    it out of the water.

    Now what happens if somebody helpfully "recovers" this craft and claims a reward for his good deed?

    1. Re:Who owns it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, most of these type of vehicles have prominent labels saying "if found call this number and return to Rutgers, we will pay you for the shiping"

    2. Re:Who owns it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are tracked and it's obvious when someone picks them up. They call home every few hours so we know where they're at. Doesn't happen too often. We have ransomed them back. It's worse when they get run-over by a ship and are never heard from again.

  15. TAM - Trans Atlantic Model Airplane Project ? by b5o5m5b · · Score: 1

    Anyone else remember the TAMs Model Airplane project from 2003? Similar idea as the Rutgers project, but they did it with a model airplane (and I'm guessing no where near the funding dollars that Rutgers has).

  16. What happens is distinctive by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Now what happens if somebody helpfully "recovers" this craft and claims a reward for his good deed?

    You don't think robot designers would have thought of that?

    Anyone attempting to "collect" it will have their unique technological features added to its own.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  17. Re:Google Earth Fans Weep by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Your intel video chip makes the Baby Jesus cry. Are you using a janky netbook, or just a difference engine? Abacus perhaps?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  18. Thrilled with the turnout! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hope they warned campus security about this wild bunch!

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/rutgers_coo/3502538162/

  19. Re:Google Earth Fans Weep by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'm using one of the most common motherboards ever made, still widely in use, a P4/2.6 that should easily run Google Earth, like many millions of people are (though none of us can use the latest Ubuntu with GE).

    Don't cry, Baby Jesus. Your abacus is miraculous, so it should run GE. Or just go ahead and use the real Earth as your plaything.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  20. Oh geezze by djupedal · · Score: 1

    The insistence on anthropomorphizing this device on the linked site is just a bit too much. ...she...her... The Scarlet Knight

    "This past week we got a nice dose of Scarletâ(TM)s personality when she missed a few of her call in times. During these periods of 'No Comms' or no communication we of course were worried about her but she finally called home to check in. It became evident to us that she is the independent younger sister compared to her older sister RU17. RU17 never hesitated to call us for help and share her troubles; she was a very good communicator. Scarlet however appears to be a bit more independent. She has also demonstrated her great climbing ability, which should prove useful in keeping her out of trouble when biology comes knocking."

    Ya think the 'team' is loaded with women that have issues, or what?

    1. Re:Oh geezze by lgw · · Score: 1

      Ships are female. It's a very old navy tradition (and they do "cost a lot to keep in powder and paint"). It's perhaps a bit of a stretch to call this a ship, but if it does cross an ocean then I wouldn't argue.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  21. Message in a Bottle by prakslash · · Score: 1

    Pfft..

    If a dumb plastic bottle can make it across the Atlantic, this will too.

  22. A little help here by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

    The Slocum Glider is a uniquely mobile network component capable of moving to specific locations and depths and occupying controlled spatial and temporal grids. Driven in a sawtooth vertical profile by variable buoyancy, the glider moves both horizontally and vertically.

    Network component... spatial and temporal grid... sawtooth profile...

    Is this some kind of boat, or a time-travelling Skynet overlord ready to kill us all?

  23. Re:Slashdot users are losers by nexxuz · · Score: 1

    Wow that is an awesome argument! You talked me into it!!!

    --
    I love random hex numbers! Just like this one, 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
  24. 2nd Attempt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flickr
    Sorry, here's the correct link.
    (Rutgers_Cool was missing the 'l')