Are you really so thick you don't actually understand the meaning of the word 'stalking'?
How can you tell when APK doesn't know a word's meaning? Because he uses the word over and over again out of context.
You got what you deserved. Your whiny post was so feeble you need to be beaten unconscious for your puerility.
Instead, all you got was a single acidic post from me - now, all this time later you're still so butthurt you just can't stop stalking my posts. You poor little butt-hurt baby!
Wladimir: You stalked apk off topic raving profanely since you can't disprove his points http://it.slashdot.org/comment... since you've tried that before and failed miserably being unable to do so.
Come up with a valid point first before complaining that I can't disprove it.
So, will you man up and answer my question or will you "run, Forrest, run" like you always do (screaming "I won! I won!" over your shoulder as you retreat) because of your immature-little-boy cowardice?
That wasn't my question. You've re-framed it to avoid answering because you know you're wrong. Pity you haven't got the chops to stand up against me and have to resort to childish diversionary tactics.
Well, you'd better find something stronger by way of argument, because we adults have known for a long, long time how to deal with naughty children like yourself.
So, will you man up and answer my question or will you "run, Forrest, run" like you always do (screaming "I won! I won!" over your shoulder as you retreat) because you're a cowardly little boy?
More wishful thinking, APK. Keep beating your head against the glass like a dirty black blowfly. We'll just sit back and watch you. Don't hold your breath waiting for someone to open a window for you though.
is that what you call rational discourse? That's trolling. You're in grave error. Rational discourse doesn't include profanity laden raving!
Another rhetorical question; are you going to spend the next couple of days squealing at me that I 'avoided your question' again? Or, have you taken a moment to read the definition of the word and won't show yourself up as a simpleton this time?
It seems you're still having difficulties so I'll explain it again for you: rational discourse is interrupted by stalking, lying trolls like yourself. Expect to get told to fuck off when you do so.
You may also expect to be told to fuck off when you complain about being modded down. You deserve each and every down-modding you get, so suck it up cupcake.
Only a fact in your own private universe where maths works differently than it does for the rest of us.
Once again you can't handle the truth so you run. Is this why you're so obsessed with telling people they've 'run forrest run' from your silly accusations?
I see you've avoided my question again. What is it about you that makes you so damn hypocritical? You always do that which you've just accused others of.
Avoiding my question because it's difficult? How quintessentially 'APK' of you.
As has been explained to you, my post that upset you so greatly was a response to your childish complaint and had nothing to do with what Trax had said to you.
No, I did not interfere in your 'discussion' (pity you've such low standards you think you've had a 'discussion' with someone when they've merely replied once to your doggerel)
What I did was comment on your typical, 'Poor Me' whiny, snivelling complaint about being modded down. It had nothing to do with Trax's post.
You wouldn't need this explained to you if you weren't so clue-free.
Perhaps in your stupidity you failed to understand that a question that has already been answered by the asker is not a question at all.
Prove otherwise.
As to your re-asking, here's another answer for you (don't forget to claim I'm still avoiding the question though!): "FUCK OFF" is an entirely appropriate response to the infantile level of garbage you post here. Your anus is still burning that most people around here seem to agree with my assessment of you.
After all, in all the time you've been here you've only got that paltry list of up-mods to show for yourself. Pity you didn't record all the down-mods, now THAT would make a very, very long list - don't you agree? HAHAHHAHAHAHA
Run like a dog? Isn't that what I just said to you? Why do you always co-opt other people's words? Is it because there's not much imagination going on in that pumpkin inside your skull?
BTW this was not off-topic stalking, you retard. YOU were off-topic in the thread and were being RIGHTLY TOLD TO FUCK OFF. You can expect this sort of reaction to you posting whiny little snivellings like the puerile bitch you are.
Don't like it? Don't fucking whine. Bitching and complaining that you're being 'stalked' is the height of selfish, childish stupidity. A pity your parents didn't do a better job of bringing you up.
Slashdot Mirror
Are you really so thick you don't actually understand the meaning of the word 'stalking'?
How can you tell when APK doesn't know a word's meaning? Because he uses the word over and over again out of context.
You got what you deserved. Your whiny post was so feeble you need to be beaten unconscious for your puerility.
Instead, all you got was a single acidic post from me - now, all this time later you're still so butthurt you just can't stop stalking my posts. You poor little butt-hurt baby!
Wladimir: You stalked apk off topic raving profanely since you can't disprove his points http://it.slashdot.org/comment... since you've tried that before and failed miserably being unable to do so.
Come up with a valid point first before complaining that I can't disprove it.
So, will you man up and answer my question or will you "run, Forrest, run" like you always do (screaming "I won! I won!" over your shoulder as you retreat) because of your immature-little-boy cowardice?
Is 243 greater than 1? Yes. Eatng your words made you stalk apk raving profanely http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
That wasn't my question. You've re-framed it to avoid answering because you know you're wrong. Pity you haven't got the chops to stand up against me and have to resort to childish diversionary tactics.
Well, you'd better find something stronger by way of argument, because we adults have known for a long, long time how to deal with naughty children like yourself.
So, will you man up and answer my question or will you "run, Forrest, run" like you always do (screaming "I won! I won!" over your shoulder as you retreat) because you're a cowardly little boy?
Wladimir:Obviously eatng your words upset you greatly & you stalked apk raving profanely http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
What are you talking about APK? You've never made anyone eat their words because you're too busy eating your own! HAHAHAHHAA!!!
More wishful thinking, APK. Keep beating your head against the glass like a dirty black blowfly. We'll just sit back and watch you. Don't hold your breath waiting for someone to open a window for you though.
Quite unlike the completely sane and rational APK. Yup, gottit.
Saw your post history. You're apk obsessed. Get professional help.
And who are we pretending to be now, APK?
Oh, and of course you saw my post history, you're busy stalking people who you complain are stalking you.
Way to get the moral high-ground, retard. Yes, that's right, the word is 'hypocrite', the same word you like to throw around about other people.
Looks more like off topic stalking complete with irrational profanity to me.
Sorry, what was that APK?
Flamebait? Really? Is that how we score ironic humour around here nowadays?
That said I suppose a +5 Flamebait is probably a sign of muddled /. groupthink.
is that what you call rational discourse? That's trolling. You're in grave error. Rational discourse doesn't include profanity laden raving!
Another rhetorical question; are you going to spend the next couple of days squealing at me that I 'avoided your question' again? Or, have you taken a moment to read the definition of the word and won't show yourself up as a simpleton this time?
It seems you're still having difficulties so I'll explain it again for you: rational discourse is interrupted by stalking, lying trolls like yourself. Expect to get told to fuck off when you do so.
You may also expect to be told to fuck off when you complain about being modded down. You deserve each and every down-modding you get, so suck it up cupcake.
I'll take that as a "Yes" then.
Nope - not stalking, just sick of seeing your tripe on Slashdot and prepared to call you out for your pathetic behaviour.
Only a fact in your own private universe where maths works differently than it does for the rest of us.
Once again you can't handle the truth so you run. Is this why you're so obsessed with telling people they've 'run forrest run' from your silly accusations?
I see you've avoided my question again. What is it about you that makes you so damn hypocritical? You always do that which you've just accused others of.
More wishful thinking buddy!
Avoiding my question because it's difficult? How quintessentially 'APK' of you.
As has been explained to you, my post that upset you so greatly was a response to your childish complaint and had nothing to do with what Trax had said to you.
No, I did not interfere in your 'discussion' (pity you've such low standards you think you've had a 'discussion' with someone when they've merely replied once to your doggerel)
What I did was comment on your typical, 'Poor Me' whiny, snivelling complaint about being modded down. It had nothing to do with Trax's post.
You wouldn't need this explained to you if you weren't so clue-free.
You wish!
Why are you having such difficulty with reason, APK? The question you ask has been answered by yourself in the same sentence.
You already have the answer you want. Explain how I am avoiding your question or shut up.
You bet!
And, if you keep stalking me and posting your feeble stupidity to Slashdot, you can expect more of the same.
Perhaps in your stupidity you failed to understand that a question that has already been answered by the asker is not a question at all.
Prove otherwise.
As to your re-asking, here's another answer for you (don't forget to claim I'm still avoiding the question though!): "FUCK OFF" is an entirely appropriate response to the infantile level of garbage you post here. Your anus is still burning that most people around here seem to agree with my assessment of you.
After all, in all the time you've been here you've only got that paltry list of up-mods to show for yourself. Pity you didn't record all the down-mods, now THAT would make a very, very long list - don't you agree? HAHAHHAHAHAHA
Quite a rational response for someone who is sick of trolls interfering in the discussion. Trolls get told to fuck off all the time.
In this case, the troll was you, so naturally you don't agree with the outcome.
Interestingly, most adults at least understand another viewpoint, even if they don't agree with it. Not you. A pity you'll never mature, APK.
You're apk obsessed. I'm not him.
APK, you are a liar.
No, it is you that avoided MY question. I asked for evidence as to why you are certain that DocHoncho is a sock-puppet of mine.
Understandably you evade because it's easier to make accusations than it is to back them up with evidence.
Put up or shut up, APK.
Run like a dog? Isn't that what I just said to you? Why do you always co-opt other people's words? Is it because there's not much imagination going on in that pumpkin inside your skull?
BTW this was not off-topic stalking, you retard. YOU were off-topic in the thread and were being RIGHTLY TOLD TO FUCK OFF. You can expect this sort of reaction to you posting whiny little snivellings like the puerile bitch you are.
Don't like it? Don't fucking whine. Bitching and complaining that you're being 'stalked' is the height of selfish, childish stupidity. A pity your parents didn't do a better job of bringing you up.
Wishful thinking, APK.
To debate with logic and facts you'd need to have some. I've yet to see any logic from you APK and your 'facts' are nothing of the sort.
If you actually had anything you wouldn't need to keep telling me how terribly you crushed me, now would you?