Slashdot Mirror
Emory University SCCM Server Accidentally Reformats All Computers Campus-wide
acidradio writes: "Somehow the SCCM application and image deployment server at Emory University in Atlanta accidentally started to repartition, reformat then install a new image of Windows 7 onto all university-managed computers. By the time this was discovered the SCCM server had managed to repartition and reformat itself. This was likely an accident. But what if it weren't? Could this have shed light on a possibly huge vulnerability in large enterprise organizations that rely heavily on automated software deployment packages like SCCM?"
Sounds like a good way to get rid of Malware
Time to test those backups!
Kind of sounds like a snake eating its tail....
The configuration deployment server apparently upgraded itself into a configuration deplorement server.
Ezekiel 23:20
Be interesting to know how much actual data was lost
The Singularity is closer than you think
Quant
The problem with centralized control is that the center can give any commands it wants...
A thousand pounds of wood moving at 300 feet per minute. Don't get in the way.
SCCM is pretty good. It makes my desktop techs jobs significantly easier to deploy assets company wide. In this case, it sounds like someone pressed some buttons without being 100% clear as to what was going on. Unfortunate someone will not be working in IT ever again.
I think the big surprise here is that this doesn't happen more often.
Consider how many corporations, universities, and such have huge PC deployments with automated updates. I've seen updates that drop all the PCs off the network, but I've never seen one where everything is wiped.
I'm also surprised that I haven't heard of malware that accidentally wiped a network of 100K or more machines when someone sent the wrong command.
Or maybe the news here is that it was in a more open environment where people hear about it. If a publicly traded company wiped a thousand PCs at its headquarters, you bet they would try to keep it quiet.
I bet the IT department is changing each other's diapers now! And updating their resumés....
Mostly random stuff.
A desperate attempt to delay taking finals?
Considering how easy it would be for a less-than-savvy IT person to accidentally encourage this situation, I doubt this is a sensational case of some huge vulnerability.
As someone who regularly provides consultation to IT staff, I know full well that there's plenty of 'administrators' that wade into waters they don't understand. We often encounter the aging IT staff member that's forced to interact with software they don't quite understand or we have the younger IT staff that impulsively click on what they don't understand, both occasionally leading a company to some manner of pandemonium level disaster. Or you simply have a dysfunctional IT department that doesn't communicate and, "oh, I'll just move this server into this container right here..." Just another day in IT.
No such instruction should be actionable without being compulsorily deployed to at least one test system, and the actions manually checked and confirmation given to the SCCM.
No instruction which affects a significant number of systems should be possible without manual confirmation to continue with the next batch of systems.
An instruction which is applied across several classes of systems should be treated as if separate instructions for each system.
I've seen enough mid-level sysadmins think that being able to write puppet scripts elevates them to god-like status, but being a good IT janitor is hard - it's primarily not about automating your job as much as possible, but about having such an intimate understanding of your system that it ends up running so smoothly that nobody thinks you're needed. (Yes, this creates a problem if you work for THAT sort of company, but nothing will change unless you fight.)
i work at a larger, private university in the USA. I really pooped my pants when i read this
Knowing that people have been running various kinds of centralized update services, perhaps across multiple OSes, and spanning several years now, listening to a story about an update server literally going rogue and nuking everything attached to it, and then for the coup de grace, basically committing suicide at the end by reformatting itself, does not sound like an accident.
If it truly was, I'd hate to see what the hell purposeful intent looks like.
So it goes, so it has been, so it will be.
In my company IT tests all upgrades on the isolated small network before deploying. You would imagine that this should be standard practice.
FOG requires a small amount of skill. And Linux. It wouldn't be impossible to do this in FOG, but it wouldn't happen by mistake!
It reformatted the drives and put Windows on them. Eeewww! That's gross!
Bad news most likely on this front. I have worked University IT, and I can guarantee they are going to have problems.
For one, no matter how many layers of backups you have, when you are working with a bunch of 90 year old academics, they will always find a way to miss every single one.
And more grievous, Universities tend to have important data that absolutely cannot be backed up in any normal way. Data that is legally obligated to stay on one specific computer in one specific room and never leave; under penalty of legal action.
Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
I Simple answer is that the underlying software must have been designed to do this. A resent software update to the SCCM server could have caused it.
This is why centralized data storage and automated installation are invaluable for managing larger sets of desktop/office computers.
If at my workplace a computer breaks, gets stolen, catches fire, whatever, I fetch a new one from the basement, tell the PXE server to load the installation image. 15 minutes later, the user can resume their work.
Then again, it's probably much more complicated to achieve this with Windows.
CLI paste? paste.pr0.tips!
...ever!
When I worked in the IT in my work study program, shared computers would be re-imaged often. We would usally re-image 300-400 computers at time. Often it was just some professor wanting certain program, it was just easier and safer just to wipe the machines. Malware was big problem at the time, sasser hit all of are computers, that sucked.
LOL...wait, it wiped WHUT?
Umm, offline backups?
It sounds like the commenter above was teachable - he no doubt learned his lesson.
It also sounds like the company's owner knew he could learn this lesson. That's the mark of a great manager.
Whether the Emory staffer responsible for this mistake is teachable or not, I hope his boss can tell the difference. Some folks aren't teachable, some are. If the Emory boss is worth his paycheck, he should be able to tell.
So why then install the Malware 7?
research university likely has a big theory based CS program and hires people only with cs degrees and not people who went to tech schools / learned on there own / on the job.
SCCM is pretty good. It makes my desktop techs jobs significantly easier to deploy assets company wide. In this case, it sounds like someone pressed some buttons without being 100% clear as to what was going on. Unfortunate someone will not be working in IT ever again.
Agreed that this is a huge blunder but mistakes happen. When you have the human factor involved there are always risks and there will be mistakes made.
I don't blame the person executing this, Ultimately it's managements responsibility to ensure the person was trained enough to not make this mistake. Someone dropped the ball??
mac systems may not even boot with the old Partition tables that are needed for older NON EFI systems that windows runs on.
also the Mac os Recovery Partition may even be wiped out.
That line really caught me since most people think that punishment works. Punishment pushes you down towards criminality not up towards better behavior. The reason people at all do better inspite of punishment is because they inherintly want to do it right and are only too happy to learn how to do so.
Our prisons are doomed since it's the best possible way to degrade and debase you to the point where you give up on society and any efforts to contribute positively to it. Instead you try to live outisde society and it's downhill from there.
Very street smart boss! You must have done something right to have him as your boss.
"Somehow" makes it sound mysterious and inexplicable. I'd be willing to bet that the truth is far less sensational. I could see a student tech assistant doing something like this on a dare, or a low-skilled admin just clicking OK one too many times, without actually reading the warning message.
why is that a bad thing? Apple doesn't want them around.
Moderators ignore your vain please KSK. You started it. Apk finsihed it and you too.
How embarassing: K.S. Kyosucky tossed names and ran since He can't backup his crap obviously.
Not only have they had to re-image all their PCs, you've now slashdotted their web server!
netboot or even an windows script that reformat the system will run on system targeted systems. Also dells, HP, both AMD and Intel and have ways for windows apps to set bios settings and some places have netboot as the default setting in boot order.
It could happen to the whole planet.
And I have seen a lot of machines try to PXE boot by default. That has got to stop.
If it's so shitty why'd k.s. kyosucky run from proving your accusation then?
apple uses EFI / UEFI.
older Pc's don't have it and in some cases with pc that have it have it turned off so they can boot XP, Windows 7 (in some cases), disk encryption, and other stuff.
32bit os's yes some places put 32 bit loads on systems with 4gb or more ram in them.
I am an SCCM 2012 administrator in real life. This is really easy to do, in fact I've almost had it happen to one of my sites. this is an example of why training is important. Somebody probably attempted to do an automated reload of a single computer lab and issued the deployment to the wrong collection. There's nothing mysterious about it, somebody screwed up.
SCCM is a geat and powerfull tool, but this is the risk that is run whenever you use an automated system. expecally to do reloads.
JB
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
"Because the university ran nightly backups, they were able to restore all the PCs to the correct state later that afternoon."
If they had a centralized SCCM server, they should have a central backup server as well.
This is why removing domain admin from the list of local admins is the 1st thing to do.
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
apple uses EFI / UEFI.
older Pc's don't have it and in some cases with pc that have it have it turned off so they can boot XP, Windows 7 (in some cases), disk encryption, and other stuff.
32bit os's yes some places put 32 bit loads on systems with 4gb or more ram in them.
Well in some cases that's for the best. 4GiB or even 8GiB is the standard amount of memory of many computers, not that one would want any thing less anyway (it wouldn't lower the costs noticeable).
And there are reasons to run 32 bit OS installations on 64 bit systems, I've have to use a separate 32 bit Windows installation in a VM to run some important programs.
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
Someone created a collection that had no constraints on it (O/S must be WinXP, Win7-64, etc). In AD, a desktop or server are all "computer" objects.
They selected the top of their AD forest or some top level OU as the base for the LDAP search (since usually servers would be in a separate OU for adminstration purposes).
They did a GREAT job to ensure that all their systems were setup with PXE boot in the BIOS. (shouldn't their servers be VM's by now, and not have PXE enabled?)
Someone will be looking for a new job (and looking for a way to explain the hole in time on their resume). Windows for dummies and their braindumper cert didn't get them very far.
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
Obviously human error... there is no patch for it.
I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
The God of Regular Expressions is stern and unforgiving. You follow his Commandments strictly. Put a star where a star should be and a dot where a dot should be and respect and obey the square brackets. It does not matter whether an aspiring acolyte priest tried to write a prayer above his station or the Most Reverend His Rootness was careless in writing his prayer, you make a mistake and God of Regular Expression will smite you down like nobody's business.
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
...starts out a system update with a format C: command under any circumstance?
Answer...presumably any Windows based *&^% that gets sold into Universities. Why wasn't the development of such a tool a graduate research project ?
I wish I had the chutzpah to sell such junk, I'd be a freaking billionaire by now too. Instead, my software is bulletproof, but it sells for pennies per seat. I guess I missed the big picture. Oh well, at least I have a clean conscience.
There are alternatives. In the open source world there is Puppet, but I've seen bash (and used bash) as a scripting agent to remotely configure software across systems. I've even written bash scripts to 'Jumpstart' Solaris machines (the firmware allowed remote controlled drive formatting, operating system installation with nothing more than a (firmware set) IP address and some idea of the machine architecture). The trick is managing the software. I really can't blame microsquish over this because this is more an Emory University software management problem more than a microsoft problem. They never said anything about remote hacks in to control the software, so this is just a local problem.
I can attest to the fact that this was no accident.
You have to explicitly, or have the unfortunate luck of clicking the wrong 20 correct buttons in a row, to do something like this, SCCM is not a one-click wonder.
GJ whoever did this, good luck with the networking department though.
Every programming or networking class I ever had..
If your program or script doesn't work (perfectly usually implied, not always stated): no credit.
This breeds arrogant assholes and cheaters. One of the many reasons IT and programming are such shit environments and careers for most people. Probably also why women, generally smarter than men, stay away in droves.
Shouldn't have called apk names and run KSKyosucky.
KS yer welcome to prove that: Take apk's challenge ya ran from after calling him names!
We already have things like User Account Control that prompt for explicit authorization for potentially detrimental actions. Perhaps systems like SCCM should have an option to require authorization from two people (like turning two keys to launch a nuke) for operations such as wiping out hundreds of computers.
This would not prevent a rogue administrator from wreaking havoc, but it might eliminate the "accident" defense.
About two years ago, a community college near me had the exact same thing happen. I don't know the excruciating details, but the basics were the same SCCM wiped out all of the servers that it was used to manage..
I didn't work for the college then (I do now), but I did know a few people that did at the time. The person that triggered it is still there. From what I understand what he was doing and the way he went about it, although in hindsight was dangerous, wasn't a really reckless thing.
Our campus is less than 30 minutes drive to Microsoft's main campus, and there was a lot of pressure for us to use their systems. I think the college paid the price for caving to that pressure. Sure, there are other factors involved here as well... A careless employee, an unintuitive result from an interface/script, poor safety mechanisms in both policy and the product, poor design by both the vendor and the college..
From what I understand, one of the most devastating aspects when it came to recovery, was that the server that held backups (Microsoft's data protection manager of course) was wiped out as well.. I think in this particular incident, only system drives were annihilated, so if a server had a "D" drive or other volumes, it was still there, it was just a useless lump sitting on a server with no OS for a while at first.
Having never heard a similar story with any other software product, I'm left believing that SCCM and it's deficiencies are at least partially to blame, and given what I know about the person that caused it here, I'd say that it's a pretty respectable bit of the blame that should be left on SCCM.
Someone realized pretty quickly what was going on (not the person that caused it), and pulled the plug on the process somehow or our college would have been even more devastated. As it stood, it was still pretty bad.. Probably only about 25% of the full destructive power of the mess as averted.
Did this happen BEFORE, or AFTER final exams?
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
My policy is that to err is human, to have proper backups is professional. Running a complex SQL update statement on a million records? That sure might have unintended consequences, so first run "select into" so you have an untouched copy to revert to. I EXPECT people to mess up. I also expect them to realize that they'll mess up, and plan accordingly.
In other news, students and staff have reported that their computers are performing much better than usual and site-wide malware and associated bandwidth hogging has massively reduced.
University now plans to do this every month.
hiring incompetent IT staff
that you've been working on for 3 years. I'm sure you can get it typed up in the next week, before you have to defend it. Good luck, and thanks for the $30K/yr to delete all your personal data!
Oh look, the little boy APK is crapflooding Slashdot again, for his own selfish purposes.
What exactly are you trying to achieve here, other than annoying un-related visitors to the site?
Do you think there's some sort of threshold over which people will magically start seeing your nonsense as insightful and think of you as something other than a childish old fool?
..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
Schmemory
This is not the sig you're looking for.
n/t
call me old fashioned, but I just pop in a CD with Windows and run the setup program to upgrade Windows.
Could this have shed light on a possibly huge vulnerability in large enterprise organizations that rely heavily on automated software deployment packages like SCCM?
This is really about a huge vulnerability in large enterprise organizations that rely on Microsoft. Incidentally, Google Inc. is not one of them.
When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
SCCM only suports PXE booting to run a task sequence - Mac's can't really boot off PXE.
Ne need to fear about AI enslaving humans in the near future: for now computers remain really dumb!
YHBT. YHL. HAND.
This is what Operations Manager is for - Change control reporting!
... and if I'd lost any files to this fiasco, I would henceforth absolutely REFUSE to use any computers that were accessible to SCCM, and I'd be trying to convince all of my colleagues to do the same.
A cowardly worm who tossed names in illogical off-topic ad hominem attack & ran from backing it up.
Like K.S. Kyosucky! No wonder the USA's going down when weasels like you = the next generation.
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
Sardaukar86 "FoaMiNg-@-The-MouTh" ReAcTioN #1 http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
Sardaukar86 "FoaMiNg-@-The-MouTh" ReAcTioN #2 http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
Why?
He had to "eat his words" vs. APK http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
Then, Sardaukar86 the lying jackass that he is *tried* to say he used "rational discourse" with APK? What a fucking joke and what a fucking hypocritical little liar bitch http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
From a fair challenge like a chickenshit blowhard http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
If it installed Linux on all the computers then on itself.
...it would have installed Windows 8.
Trying to "hide" this lol http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
Trying to downmod "hide" this http://it.slashdot.org/comment... and this about YOU too (lmao) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... loser. You lose. That's just how you roll/what you do (lmao). Especially against apk who played you and K.S. Kyosuke like fiddles into blowing all your modpoints so you can't "hide things" with bad minus mods anymore.
Trying to "hide" this with minusmods (you fail, you're outta 'em) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... so gotta hand it to apk. He played you like a fiddle getting you to follow his posts blowing your modpoints. Now you've run dry or soon will, and you can't "hide things" you're obviously not too proud you did anymore, hahahahaha.
Trying to "hide" this with minusmods (you fail, you're outta 'em) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... so gotta hand it to apk. He played you like a fiddle getting you to follow his posts blowing your modpoints. Now you've run dry or soon will, and you can't "hide things" you're obviously not too proud you did anymore, hahahahaha.
Trying to "hide" this with minusmods (you fail, you're outta 'em) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... so gotta hand it to apk. He played you like a fiddle getting you to follow his posts blowing your modpoints. Now you've run dry or soon will, and you can't "hide things" you're obviously not too proud you did anymore, hahahahaha.
Trying to "hide" this with minusmods (you fail, you're outta 'em) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... so gotta hand it to apk. He played you like a fiddle getting you to follow his posts blowing your modpoints. Now you've run dry or soon will, and you can't "hide things" you're obviously not too proud you did anymore, hahahahaha.
Trying to "hide" this with minusmods (you fail, you're outta 'em) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... so gotta hand it to apk. He played you like a fiddle getting you to follow his posts blowing your modpoints. Now you've run dry or soon will, and you can't "hide things" you're obviously not too proud you did anymore, hahahahaha.
Trying to "hide" this with minusmods (you fail, you're outta 'em) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... so gotta hand it to apk. He played you like a fiddle getting you to follow his posts blowing your modpoints. Now you've run dry or soon will, and you can't "hide things" you're obviously not too proud you did anymore, hahahahaha.
Trying to "hide" this with minusmods (you fail, you're outta 'em) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... so gotta hand it to apk. He played you like a fiddle getting you to follow his posts blowing your modpoints. Now you've run dry or soon will, and you can't "hide things" you're obviously not too proud you did anymore, hahahahaha.
Trying to "hide" this by minusmods (you fail/you're outta 'em) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... Gotta hand it to apk: He played you like a fiddle (Sardaukar86 too) getting you both to follow his posts blowing your modpoints. Now you've run dry or soon will, and you can't "hide things" you're obviously not too proud you did anymore, hahahahaha.
Trying to "hide" this by minusmods (you fail/you're outta 'em) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... Gotta hand it to apk: He played you like a fiddle (Sardaukar86 too) getting you both to follow his posts blowing your modpoints. Now you've run dry or soon will, and you can't "hide things" you're obviously not too proud you did anymore, hahahahaha.
Trying to "hide" this by minusmods (you fail/you're outta 'em) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... Gotta hand it to apk: He played you like a fiddle (Sardaukar86 too) getting you both to follow his posts blowing your modpoints. Now you've run dry or soon will, and you can't "hide things" you're obviously not too proud you did anymore, hahahahaha.
Trying to "hide" this by minusmods (you fail/you're outta 'em) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... Gotta hand it to apk: He played you like a fiddle (Sardaukar86 too) getting you both to follow his posts blowing your modpoints. Now you've run dry or soon will, and you can't "hide things" you're obviously not too proud you did anymore, hahahahaha.
How unsurprising to find paranoia is comorbid to your underlying mental problems. It must be very tiring living with all that circular reasoning going round inside your pointy little head.
I don't down-mod you, APK, I don't need to. Other people do that for me. I tend to use my mod-points for rewarding insightful or interesting posts, because I am not pregnant with bile in the manner that you are, poor little boy.
..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
Trying to "hide" this by minusmods (you fail/you're outta 'em) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... Gotta hand it to apk: He played you like a fiddle (Sardaukar86 too) getting you both to follow his posts blowing your modpoints. Now you've run dry or soon will, and you can't "hide things" you're obviously not too proud you did anymore, hahahahaha.
Trying to "hide" this by minusmods (you fail/you're outta 'em) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... Gotta hand it to apk: He played you like a fiddle (Sardaukar86 too) getting you both to follow his posts blowing your modpoints. Now you've run dry or soon will, and you can't "hide things" you're obviously not too proud you did anymore, hahahahaha.
Trying to "hide" this by minusmods (you fail/you're outta 'em) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... Gotta hand it to apk: He played you like a fiddle (Sardaukar86 too) getting you both to follow his posts blowing your modpoints. Now you've run dry or soon will, and you can't "hide things" you're obviously not too proud you did anymore, hahahahaha.
Trying to "hide" this by minusmods (you fail/you're outta 'em) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... Gotta hand it to apk: He played you like a fiddle (Sardaukar86 too) getting you both to follow his posts blowing your modpoints. Now you've run dry or soon will, and you can't "hide things" you're obviously not too proud you did anymore, hahahahaha.
Trying to "hide" this by minusmods (you fail/you're outta 'em) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... Gotta hand it to apk: He played you like a fiddle (Sardaukar86 too) getting you both to follow his posts blowing your modpoints. Now you've run dry or soon will, and you can't "hide things" you're obviously not too proud you did anymore, hahahahaha.
Truth hurt, Sardaukar86? Yes (no more hiding it with bad minusmods either, lol) http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
Trying to "hide" this by minusmods (you fail/you're outta 'em) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... Gotta hand it to apk: He played you like a fiddle (Sardaukar86 too) getting you both to follow his posts blowing your modpoints. Now you've run dry or soon will, and you can't "hide things" you're obviously not too proud you did anymore, hahahahaha.
Sardaukar86 "FoaMiNg-@-The-MouTh" ReAcTioN #1 http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
Sardaukar86 "FoaMiNg-@-The-MouTh" ReAcTioN #2 http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
Why?
He had to "eat his words" vs. APK http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
Then, Sardaukar86 the reprehensible little lying jackass did a post on "rational discourse" pointing out APK directly in it too AFTER the above? LMAO - please: Give me a break! See here http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
Oh, & funny they're NOT doing it now (it was you & K.S. Kyosuke obviously & you're outta modpoints gas today, lol! You FAIL/lose, as always, vs. the SUPERIOR apk!)
Trying to "hide" this by minusmods (you fail/you're outta 'em) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... Gotta hand it to apk: He played you like a fiddle (Sardaukar86 too) getting you both to follow his posts blowing your modpoints. Now you've run dry or soon will, and you can't "hide things" you're obviously not too proud you did anymore, hahahahaha.
Trying to "hide" this by minusmods (you fail/you're outta 'em) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... Gotta hand it to apk: He played you like a fiddle (Sardaukar86 too) getting you both to follow his posts blowing your modpoints. Now you've run dry or soon will, and you can't "hide things" you're obviously not too proud you did anymore, hahahahaha.
Trying to "hide" this by minusmods (you fail/you're outta 'em) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... Gotta hand it to apk: He played you like a fiddle (Sardaukar86 too) getting you both to follow his posts blowing your modpoints. Now you've run dry or soon will, and you can't "hide things" you're obviously not too proud you did anymore, hahahahaha.
You, The Liar, wouldn't know truth if it knocked on your front door.
Amusingly you then call everyone else a hypocrite. You are an endless source of funnies, APK.
Oh, and you know the best thing about my post about your mental issues? It's currently scored at 3 but it spent a while at +5 which means lots and lots of people read it, no doubt many of them had a good laugh at you.
Interestingly, it has remained above its initial score which suggests that on the whole, people agree with me about you.
Tell me again how you're my better?
What was that about how superior you think you are?
..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
Which you're obviously 2++ yrs. later still butthurt over (like an obsessed psycho) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... & funniest of all is you did it to yourself with your big mouth that wrote checks your dim brain can't cash!
R O T F L M A O...
Running a "wee bit 'dry'" on those modpoints I see (& you rarely post gaming the modpoints machine, & yes, I know how it works for you "registered 'lusers'" the same way i PLAYED YOU (you played yourself) are we after issuing so many downmods (yes).
Who're you trying to fool? Yourself?? Please.
APK
P.S.=> Get over it - I blew you away, again, as per usual - especially vs. your "rational discourse" bullshit in that link above where your workds did you in quoted!
Oh yea (since it's tradition with you) know what?
Well... lol, YOU know (& I've just GOTTA SAY IT, as-is-per my "inimitable style"):
THIS? This was just "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2ez'" & it always is, vs. this INFERIOR trolling psycho stooge, Sardaukar86....
... apk
Sardaukar86 "FoaMiNg-@-The-MouTh" ReAcTioN #1 http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
Sardaukar86 "FoaMiNg-@-The-MouTh" ReAcTioN #2 http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
Why?
He had to "eat his words" vs. APK http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
Then, Sardaukar86 the reprehensible little lying jackass did a post on "rational discourse" pointing out APK directly in it too AFTER the above? LMAO - please: Give me a break! See here http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
How'id eatin yer words taste rammed down by yer foot in yer mouth + a bitter taste of self-defeat http://it.slashdot.org/comment... ? That's all - Hahahaha
After reading your reply what is wrong with you? He quoted your own words contradicting yourself faoming at the mouth raving like a lunatic. Please leave this website. You are a troll with significant issues.
Did they not set flags on the sccm server after the soe is deployed, which sets the workstation to do not rebuild .
Is there not a pxe password at the step prior to soe deployment from the list of soe optoins?]
sounds like a very amateur deployment and they are paying the price. on a side note when deploying applications/images if you clear the sql query and hit apply by default it select all* ......good chance this may have happened :)
A bit about SCCM for those who are wondering.. It basically allows you to automate Windows and software installations by using what's called a task sequence. The task sequence is a list of commands, for example, reboot to WinPE, partition, format, install windows, join domain, install software, etc. A task sequence can either be available or required. It can then be assigned to a group of computers that the admin assign, for example "All 32 bit Windows 7 machines" Someone obviously did the number one SCCM nono.. NEVER make a task sequence a requirement for All Systems. :)
Here's hoping that maybe, just maybe they had User State Migration enabled so it backed up everyone's data before formatting.
Don't underestimate IPMI and its equivalent (what was Intel's name for their proprietary alternative? ME ?)
With this kind of technologies, you have a small mini-embed system in the motherboard, which talk over a TCP/IP network and provides all functionnality (including wake-on-lan, including shutdown, including reboots (AND specifying what resource to reboot to - like starting PXE or emulated-over-network USB driver), including VNC remoting, and Serial-over-IP (for some server remoting).
Think of all the niceties you have inside a VirtualBOX or VMWare emulator, but on actual real hardware.
It's very popular in enterprise settings so sysadmins can update a whole division's computers, instead to having to walk to each one of hundreds of machine).
So it available under some form on most workstations, servers, and enterprise laptops.
If you need to upgrade machines, the usual procedure is:
1. you politely ask the user to not start any over-night computation and if possible leave their machine off.
2. when the evening comes you log into the lights-out management of each of the target the workstation over *IP* (no MAC-address shenningans, straith IP address) (you either have simple accounts with password, or you can have it integrated to some larger systems)
3. because none of the user would have actually left the workstation off as requested, you first try to nicely shutdown the machines (you send an ACPI soft-off signal, and hope that the OS will react and nicely save and shutdown).
4. after a timeout you force shutdown the remaining machines (you send a Reset or Power OFF signal)
5. you boot all the machine and ask them to load your payload instead of the disk (it can be either classical PXE, or you can remotely emulate a USB drive) so all machine boot the management software even that bizare guy who insist on having CD as his primary boot device on his workstation.
6. you remotely launch the necessary administration. Either it runs unattended, or you can remotely control if needed (depending on the tool used, you might use a proprietary administration tool, or SSH, or Serial-over-Internet. If it's an asinine tool, you might need to VNC)
7. you reboot the machine and let them follow normal boot order.
The system has lots of advantage:
- it can be scripted with command line tools.
- you can even change BIOS settings, etc.
- it's handled by an embed system (usually part of the chipset) so this is completely independent of what the main CPU is doing (the workstation might be running or might be powered off).
The system has a few drawbacks:
- massive security problems: the user-friendly web-interface of lots of "lights-out" implementation is buggy and an exploit-nightmare (most securing recommandation start by "turn the web console off").
- security problem: you need to setup proper accounts and passwords (to avoid a script kiddie wrecking havock after having guessed a few standard passwords. Minimum is setting acceptable local accounts)
So, going back to the discussion:
- if the workstations have Lights-out remote administration (virtually all enterprise hardware is sold with)
- if the remote administration is properly setup...
You have full control possibilities on the whole fleet of workstations, without any of the hassle of dealing with low-level functionnalities like PXE, WOL, etc.
If an administrator has done a bad job at automating it all, you might end up with the whole enterprise being remotely reformated.
At least the students machine are probaly safe:
- the consumer grade laptops don't usually feature "lights-out" management.
- the student who has bought an enterprise-class laptop probably hasn't it activated (and if the student is savvy enough to turn it on for own use, the student has sure enough setup decent accounts).
Given the security problems mentionned above, that means NSA and China have probably full administrative access to 1/3 of all enterprise workstations running everywhere.
"Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
Now this doesn't just "SOUND like" you raving, it shows it http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
After all: Those ARE YOUR WORDS quoted, hypocrite, right there in black & white, twice, then getting SHOT DOWN IN FLAMES by APK with him making YOU "eat your words", rotflmao (oh, the shame of it!).
No denying it. You fail. Especially after your rant about "rational discourse" when that link shows you stalking apk harassing him with profane ravings on your part.
Too bad APK easily cooked you like a goose for your stupid statement in a 244++:1 ratio against you from your fellow /. peers contrary opinions to yours http://it.slashdot.org/comment... , eh?
How did your words taste since you had to eat them rammed down your throat since your foot was in your MOUTH washed down with "the bitter taste of SELF-defeat" when APK made you eat them http://slashdot.org/comments.p... for your blundering stupidity opening your mouth which wrote a check your dim brain can't cash?
(Tell us since we've been asking & "inquiring minds want to know")
244++:1 odds against you from your own /. peers contrary opinions to your own butthurt obviously biased stalker troll "opinion" which got shot down in flames by apk.
Their network is flat. There aren't any firewalls between the servers and the rest of the system, so there's nothing to stop one from hopping to the other.
It wouldn't surprise me if it was a student messing around and decided to see what would happen if he did this.
'My arguments stand on merit' by Sardaukar86 (850333) on Monday May 19, 2014 @12:06AM (#47035737) Homepage
Apk knocked them down 244:1 + you with them http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
But when I do, I reformat the entire campus and SCCM http://i.imgur.com/zpMmtNw.jpg
Soneone had an OS deployment to a collection, then they went to add a query to it but left it default (Select * from SMS_R_System).. this adds all systems.
- HappySCCM
They may boot with the old partition table, but if you do not obey the old partitioning, they will not get any further.
You see, when Macs boot, they use a special OS loader in the EFI partition (a FAT-formatted partition). The EFI loader loads it (bootx.efi, IIRC) and executes it as an EFI program. That EFI program then looks for the OS system partition and loads the kernel. The OS loader uses the EFI library to access the hard drive and display and has a built-in filesystem driver to read HFS+.
Without the EFI partition, you'll just get the blinking question mark as EFI can't find the OS loader.
And there's Sardaukar86's version "Oh fuck off, fuck off FUCK OFF ALREADY!!" by Sardaukar86 (850333) on Sunday December 18, 2011 @05:50AM (#38414922) Homepage FROM http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
And there's Sardaukar86's version "Oh fuck off, fuck off FUCK OFF ALREADY!!" by Sardaukar86 (850333) on Sunday December 18, 2011 @05:50AM (#38414922) Homepage FROM http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
And there's Sardaukar86's version "Oh fuck off, fuck off FUCK OFF ALREADY!!" by Sardaukar86 (850333) on Sunday December 18, 2011 @05:50AM (#38414922) Homepage FROM http://news.slashdot.org/comme...
And there's Sardaukar86's version "Oh fuck off, fuck off FUCK OFF ALREADY!!" by Sardaukar86 (850333) on Sunday December 18, 2011 @05:50AM (#38414922) Homepage FROM http://news.slashdot.org/comme... where you came in off topic profanely raving while you stalked apk during his conversation with Trax, psycho. Notice his "rational disocourse" (lol, not) now also.
And there's Sardaukar86's version "Oh fuck off, fuck off FUCK OFF ALREADY!!" by Sardaukar86 (850333) on Sunday December 18, 2011 @05:50AM (#38414922) Homepage FROM http://news.slashdot.org/comme... where he came in off topic stalking apk with profane ravings interfering with apk and Trax's conversation.
And there's Sardaukar86's version "Oh fuck off, fuck off FUCK OFF ALREADY!!" by Sardaukar86 (850333) on Sunday December 18, 2011 @05:50AM (#38414922) Homepage FROM http://news.slashdot.org/comme... where he came in off topic stalking apk with profane ravings interfering with apk and Trax's conversation.
What backups? They got deleted too.
It's called back up to disk.
243:1 odds against you http://it.slashdot.org/comment... Wladimir you stalked apk off topic raving profanely http://news.slashdot.org/comme... and Wladimir you're unable to disprove apk's points validly on adblock being inferior to hosts files http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
I have the bad luck to work in an office complex with a significant number of Emory employees. Sure we have many companies here and many different kinds of workers. However, unlike any other group of employees I've ever seen, the Emory people are uniformly some of the most sloven, stupid, slow, morbidly obese, and entitled I've ever encountered outside of a government office. DMV, tax offices? The ones they didn't hire are all at Emory.
And they are all like that. It's not like there are some normal workers and that guy in the back cube who sort of does nothing. No. There are NO normal workers. They are all huge, slow, permanently pissed and offended that anyone exists at all. DMV attitude in full effect.
Perhaps these people actually DO work at some point during the day but it appears to all outside observers that they spend most of their time wandering around, sitting around, whining about having to share the universe with non-Emory workers, and generally being assholes. These people don't just have a holier than thou attitude, they have a holier than holier than thou attitude. They walk on the water in the sweat on Jesus' brow.
Maybe Emory itself packaged up all the loser donothing employees and shipped them off to an outside office park, because that's the only thing that makes sense. Got rid of the ones could not or would not fire.
So if all this idiots had their PCs reformatted, on the one hand I would be thrilled. Awwww too bad. However, none of them want to work anyway so having a useless PC is just another legitimate excuse to wander around being asses.
"OH what a whiner, just hates Emory people" No. YOU try working around these people. Promise you you'll learn to hate very quickly.
No, 'APK' maths does not equal 'real world' maths. Come back to me when you have an argument. by Sardaukar86 (850333) on Sunday May 25, 2014 @05:19PM (#47089155) Homepage
Accept it - it's fact-> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... you fail, and that's that. Get some medication for your math difficulties. You need them. It's also "mathematics" dolt. Not "maths". Get a real education also. You need that too judging by the fact you *think* 244 1.
Sardaukar86's "FoaMiNg-@-The-MouTh" stalking http://news.slashdot.org/comme... of apk and completely off topic.
Why?
Sardaukar86 had to "eat his words" vs. APK http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
R O T F L M A O!
No denying it.
Sardaukar86's "FoaMiNg-@-The-MouTh" stalking http://news.slashdot.org/comme... of apk and completely off topic.
Why?
Sardaukar86 had to "eat his words" vs. APK http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
R O T F L M A O!
No denying it...
Sardaukar86's "FoaMiNg-@-The-MouTh" stalking http://news.slashdot.org/comme... of apk and completely off topic.
Why?
Sardaukar86 had to "eat his words" vs. APK http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
R O T F L M A O!
No denying it.
Accept it - it's fact
I accept that you have no understanding of what you are talking about.
Go on, prove to me that you are correct and that your cherry-picked list is in any way statistically valid. Go on, I'm waiting.
Get some medication for your math difficulties. You need them. It's also "mathematics" dolt. Not "maths". Get a real education also.
1. Maths is a perfectly legitimate abbreviation for the word 'mathematics'. I suggest you do some research before opening your cake-hole, dolt.
2. I am satisfactorily educated, thank you very much. You may have noticed that I write at a much higher literary level than you can muster. I also find it typically hypocritical of you to attack my education, given the common knowledge of how poorly the US educates its children. You are definitely a product of this sub-standard education, as evidenced by your need to attack mine.
You need that too judging by the fact you *think* 244 1.
No, I don't 'think' 244 is less than 1. However, as you've had explained to you a number of times, you are an utter failure. Your comparison is merely another example of your incompetence and I laugh derisively at you for failing to understand such a basic concept.
..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
I accept that you have no understanding of what you are talking about.by Sardaukar86 (850333) on Monday May 26, 2014 @04:03PM (#47094455) Homepage
Sardaukar86: 244 is greater than your 1 - accept it. It's fact. Elementary school math. Now, "eat your words" (lol) -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... which hopefully you have some manners and don't keep talking with your mouth full as you eat them (sparing us your bullshit).
You are an utter failure. Your mental incompetence knows no bounds. by Sardaukar86 (850333) on Monday May 26, 2014 @04:08PM (#47094501) Homepage
At least the rest of us know 244 of your /. peers disagreeing with your 1 proved apk right again: Now, go "eat your words" (lmao) -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... and learn basic elementary school math already, hohohoho.
Have something to eat instead of wasting energies on your loon ravings! Your words WILL do nicely as you have to "eat them" anyhow (lmao) vs. YOUR SUPERIOR, apk -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
FUCKING SICK OF READING POSTS BY APK regardless of their content. Get that through your thick skull you fucking loser. by Sardaukar86 (850333) on Monday May 26, 2014 @04:14PM (#47094549) Homepage
Temper, temper Sardaukar86: Have somethiing to EAT! Now, go "eat your words" & take a remedial math course of elementary school class levels already (lol) since a 244++:1 ratio against you seems to "strangely elude you" http://it.slashdot.org/comment... LMAO and I *think* ole' Sardillo's about to "blow"... lol!
Apk knows 244's > 1, unlike YOU! So calm down (lol) & "eat your words" (lmao) http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
It's fact. Like the fact you have to "eat your words" vs.your SUPERIOR, apk -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
APK knows very little, if your previous posts are anything to go by.
Go on, prove me wrong.
..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
Now, go "eat your words" (not good nutrition but hey. that's how you roll) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... LMAO!
That a 244++:1 ratio made you "eat your words"??? Please (lmao) -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
Now, go "eat your words" (not good nutrition but hey. that's how you roll) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... LMAO!
So you're going to avoid my point again? Sounds like the tactics of the thoroughly beaten.
Face it APK, you may squirm all you like but you're caught in the cold hard light of reality and everyone can see you're fucked.
Loser.
..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
Hahahhahahaa
..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
if you're so certain of the validity of your workings, why don't you post an Ask Slashdot and see for yourself by Sardaukar86 (850333) on Monday May 26, 2014 @05:13PM (#47094889) Homepage
In a 244++:1 ratio against you Sardillo - now stfu & go "eat your words" (lmao) http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
You don't need to take my word for it. by Sardaukar86 (850333) on Monday May 26, 2014 @05:13PM (#47094889) Homepage
Wouldn't want to disturb you "EATING" those words of yours, lmao!
Seems it was a wasted effort; there's no teaching the wilfully ignorant. by Sardaukar86 (850333) on Monday May 26, 2014 @05:13PM (#47094889) Homepage
We're not the 'ignorant' ones: You are! 244 is greater than your 1 Sardillo, accept it. You fail vs. YOUR SUPERIOR, apk.
When you defecate after (lmao) "eating your words"(lmao) http://it.slashdot.org/comment... Pretty sore evidently, based on all the profanity I hear you raving (which is the sure sign of your 'fail' vs. YOUR SUPERIOR, apk).
There's no arguing a 244++:1 ratio of your /. peers liking apk's posts is greater than your 1 http://it.slashdot.org/comment... and that you had to "eat your words", Hahahahaha
Dreams are free; unfortunately, the truth doesn't come easy to retards like you, APK.
Keep on fantasizing about your 'victory', loser.
..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
Circular reasoning from APK, content-free posts.. is there anything you're useful for?
..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
You failed & had to "eat your words" vs. apk in a 244++:1 ratio against you http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
Absolutely: Ask Sardaukar86 (after he "eats his words", lol) http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
Wriggle, squirm. Can't make any ground against me so you have to repeat yourself.
Nothing to say, nothing to add, empty arguments, empty head, you couldn't fail any harder if you tried, loser.
..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
244++:1 vs. you makes it so. See here & go (lmao) "eat your words" & stfu already http://it.slashdot.org/comment... & apk has nothing you say? Boy, you need help with math. He's got 244 /.'ers vs. your b.s. you had to eat (lol).
Answer: none whatsoever, but you'd have to understand basic stats to know why.
Loser.
..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
APK demonstrates his childish lack of intellect by simply re-posting, thinking that this will somehow prove his point.
If you had something you'd offer it; instead you repeat yourself.
Logical conclusion: APK has failed.
..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
Now, go back to (lmao) "eating your words" after your huge blunder here http://it.slashdot.org/comment... hahahaha
Since this is no dream, just fact: & the fact is, you had to (lmao) "eat your words" http://it.slashdot.org/comment... Hahahahaha purest truth - "argue with the numbers" (244++:1 against you from your own /. peers too).
In a 244++:1 ratio against you & the only thing you're good for is (rotflmao) "eating your words" http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
Argue with the numbers (244++:1 against you from your /. peers) & "eat your words" http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
Argue with the numbers 244++:1 against you while you (lmao) have to "eat your words" http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
Doesn't require intellect. For you it seems diffiicult. Why? Your POOR DIET "eating your words" http://it.slashdot.org/comment... lmao!
"BWAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Yeah, Slashdot DID speak for you - it said "You are a troll". What else would you expect, you hypocritical, stalking, crap-spouting Slashdot Clown. wiping tears from my eyes, thanks for that good laugh... do you honestly think people here LIKE you? You're the most reviled, pathetic piece of shit to ever grace this site - that's saying a LOT too, because we all remember people like MichaelKristopeit and you don't even compare. Let me repeat this for you: YOU. ARE. NOT. LIKED.No amount of mod points will change that, ever." - by Sardaukar86 (850333) on Monday May 26, 2014 @05:40PM (#47095129) Homepage
I get that "last laugh" on YOU, as usual, using your own words against you!
Hahahahaha, so as usual? You must "eat your words" (again) -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... (you're the one who came in here stalking me as usual, & got "shot down" downmodded for it, again... lol!).
* :)
(You fool... lol!)
APK
P.S.=> Between this major screwup of yours yet again, your big mouth writing checks you can't ca$h, & your 244++:1 ratio against your b.s. of our /. peers uprating my posts? You FAIL again: Now, GO "eat your words" & I'd recommend a dietary change - since eating your words != GOOD NUTRITION (lmao) -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
"BWAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Yeah, Slashdot DID speak for you - it said "You are a troll". What else would you expect, you hypocritical, stalking, crap-spouting Slashdot Clown. wiping tears from my eyes, thanks for that good laugh... do you honestly think people here LIKE you? You're the most reviled, pathetic piece of shit to ever grace this site - that's saying a LOT too, because we all remember people like MichaelKristopeit and you don't even compare. Let me repeat this for you: YOU. ARE. NOT. LIKED. No amount of mod points will change that, ever." - by Sardaukar86 (850333) on Monday May 26, 2014 @05:40PM (#47095129) Homepage
As usual You must "eat your words" (again) WHERE YOU WERE -1 "TROLL" DOWNMODDED (lol, "oh the SHAME of it" calling me what YOU WERE DOWNMODDED AS, hahaha, you HYPOCRITE) -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
* :)
For your UTTER HYPOCRITICAL BULLSHIT in that post you did on 'rational discourse' which I showed EVERYONE READING how 'rational' your stalking ME, with YOU completely offtopic, is riddled with profanities, here -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ... lol!
---
( Unlike you, I don't *need* the "support" of others: I merely use facts ( + your own words you have to end up eating too, lmao) to TRASH you easily & again - I get that "last laugh" on YOU, as usual, using your own words against you, fool... lol! )
APK
P.S.=> Between this major screwup of yours yet again, your big mouth writing checks you can't ca$h, & your 244++:1 ratio against your b.s. of our /. peers uprating my posts here -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
Where YOU had to "eat your words" - You FAIL again & I'd recommend a dietary change (lol) - since eating your words != GOOD NUTRITION & I wonder (lmao): HOW DID "EATING YOUR WORDS" TASTE?!
... apk
By providing evidences of YOUR numerous stalkings of apk shown here http://slashdot.org/comments.p...