Is it possible given the time and perseverence to exploit a vunerability in a search engine's parsing of a webpage say, you maliciously published somewhere?
Obviously one would expect google and the likes to have good security (well apart from the gmail exploit and... well lets not go there), so I was curious has it ever been done?
(ponders)
I was excited about this line of "technology" the last few times i heard about it earlier this millenia...
With the price of disc printers/all in one printers as they are, I dont know how it will secure much more than a niche market; and without mainstream support, stock availability will always be a specialised item at best.
But that said, I still want to have the swish burned in labels!:)
I have yet to see a privacy, filtering, large firewall that has been able to prevent "our freedoms" without compromise.
With the advent of so many online anti-privacy resources such as anonymous cloaking (the-cloak.com), tunnelling connections to a another unfiltered location and all the other tricks like masquerading URL's and what have you, I do not believe that the IT literate people of china would be truly prevented from doing as they please.
If i have said it once, i have said it a thousand times - no "protection" can be 100% secure whilst being 100% functional.
I would worry more about physical security from Chinese Forces if you are truly wanting to push the imposed limits.
Slashdot Mirror
Is it possible given the time and perseverence to exploit a vunerability in a search engine's parsing of a webpage say, you maliciously published somewhere? Obviously one would expect google and the likes to have good security (well apart from the gmail exploit and... well lets not go there), so I was curious has it ever been done? (ponders)
I was excited about this line of "technology" the last few times i heard about it earlier this millenia... With the price of disc printers/all in one printers as they are, I dont know how it will secure much more than a niche market; and without mainstream support, stock availability will always be a specialised item at best. But that said, I still want to have the swish burned in labels! :)
I have yet to see a privacy, filtering, large firewall that has been able to prevent "our freedoms" without compromise.
With the advent of so many online anti-privacy resources such as anonymous cloaking (the-cloak.com), tunnelling connections to a another unfiltered location and all the other tricks like masquerading URL's and what have you, I do not believe that the IT literate people of china would be truly prevented from doing as they please.
If i have said it once, i have said it a thousand times - no "protection" can be 100% secure whilst being 100% functional.
I would worry more about physical security from Chinese Forces if you are truly wanting to push the imposed limits.