Slashdot Mirror


Taking My Freedom With Me to China?

Solo Han asks: "I'm considering a move to China next year, and while I have just as many problems as y'all do with the government, I still like the freedoms afforded me, especially when it comes to access of information. Chinese citizens, however, do not have the same freedoms, as we are constantly reminded here on slash-o-dot. Pr0n, mp3z, and games aside, what are the things that those of you in the Celestial Kingdom know you cannot access, and specifically, what are the websites, search engines, news sites, and other sites that are classed as potentially 'dangerous' material? This brings me to my overall question: is the censorship that real, that hard to get around, and how do you do it? What methods and technologies are you aware of or use to circumvent the Great Firewall of China?"

1,392 comments

  1. Well... by rackhamh · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nothing for you to see here. Please move along.

    Does that answer your question?

    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I visited and found I had internet access to everything I needed. However, I had VPN access so there is a good chance I might have simply missed something completely because I was using my US server.(Because RDP is much less latency sensitive so the Terminal Server connection was faster for surfing US websites than a typical browser)

      Regardless, I found the place to be a blast, but I have to admit you do tend to stay on you best behavior because you constantly bump into police with very large automatic weapons.

    2. Re:Well... by rackhamh · · Score: 3, Funny

      Off-topic? You must be joking. Okay, maybe you're not, so let me run it down for you...

      We're talking about censorship.

      I clicked on the article and got the message, "Nothing for you to see here. Please move along" -- which, if you have half a brain, you know is a phrase commonly used when people are trying to hide or cover up something.

      Therefore perfectly relevant and (IMO, though others may disagree), kind of humorous.

      Honestly, didn't you have a better use for those moderator points?

    3. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fully agree on the comment. Not only that, but I'm really annoyed whenever I'm the target of the "move along".

    4. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not Offtopic, but it is Redundant. Seeing as post cost the same amount of Moderator points and affect your karma equally, there isn't a whole lot to complain about here.

    5. Re:Well... by carninja · · Score: 2, Funny

      Agreed, parent is not off topic. The mods are on crack, because we all know that mods on marijuana mark everything 5 - Funny.

    6. Re:Well... by rackhamh · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How is it redundant? Redundant would imply that my comment was simply a repetition of a similar sentiment already expressed in the same thread. Which it wasn't.

      Honestly, people confuse me sometimes.

    7. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, majority of mods are not people. Your comment was one of the smartest I saw here in a long time.

    8. Re:Well... by Stargoat · · Score: 5, Informative
      I just came back from China. Internet sucks, particularly outside of Beijing and Shanghai. Daily access to life, such as going where you want to go is not bad, until you run into government officials. The communists will make your life hell. Simple things, like sending knives through the mail, are impossible to do. If they come to your house, even though you legally bought it, that butcher knife you use to cut your meat is illegal.

      Basically, if they want to get you, they will find something to get you. Behave yourself. Not for your sake, but for that of your friends and any relatives you may have. If you are ABC (and you know what that means if you are), this goes double. What they might not do to whites, they will do to ABC.

      Be prepared to stand in line for any government business. Also, any privacy you think you might be entitled to at a bank is non-existent. If you are white, you may complain about hospitality and get a little bit of space. If you are ABC, fugetabotit.

      You'll lose 25 pounds in two weeks. Be prepared for that. You'll probably also catch a cold your first week there.

      Speaking of cold, everyone wears a jacket all the time. It's a cold winter over there right now. Expect to be cold most of the time. Thick blue jeans from Walmart or Farm & Fleet are a good idea. So is long underwear. It sounds stupid. It's not. I wished I had brought some, and I spend my winters outside working without any.

      Fly straight through. Immigration is a pain, and two hundred dollars for tickets on United as opposed to China Eastern with a stop over is worth it. It'll be some of the best money you'll ever spend. Also, your luggage will probably break sometime between leaving home and getting back home.

      Watch your wallet, especially in the train station. I was there for not too long, and I had four people try to pick my pocket. Also, Beijing and Shanghai are not China. If you are going some place like Dailong, or Kaifung, life will be different.

      Take amoxillician. The Chinese are very proud of Chinese herbal medicine. Proud to the point of insisting on feeding it to you until you require immediate hospitization.

      Be safe while over there. Pocket knives are a good idea. If you bring US dollars, right now, you can live like a king on a beer budget. But that is not going to last longer than the year. China's going to be changing the way it pegs the RMB soon.

      Have fun and good luck. If you need more, check out my journal or leave me a note there. China can get depressing, so keep a smile on your face. That'll cure most ills.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    9. Re:Well... by OneIsNotPrime · · Score: 5, Informative

      ABC = American Born Chinese

      --

      ---

      WARNING:Slashdot karma not redeemable in the afterlife.

    10. Re:Well... by Eric+Savage · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Simple things, like sending knives through the mail, are impossible to do."

      I'm sorry, but I don't think I would consider mailing knives a "simple thing". A hat, sure; a weapon, no.

      --

      This is not the greatest sig in the world, this is just a tribute.
    11. Re:Well... by uncleFester · · Score: 3, Interesting

      interesting timing, no?

      -'fester

      --
      -'fester
    12. Re:Well... by czbear · · Score: 1

      You can't possibly be referring to Mainland China. I was there in 02 & 03. The police do not carry weapons in Beijing and the cities I visited, sure their will be honor guard at Mao's tomb and "the square" but those guys don't even have bullets.

      China is much like England in that regard; I did not have any problems accessing major services. Google and China apparently reached an agreement so you simply don't know your not seeing gimped results.

      I did have a problem accessing my DSL Web server at home, they likely have a block on private IP block to prevent unaccountable people from providing free downloads of Battlefield Vietnam or Flashpoint Korea.

      I'm traveling there in about 3 days, I hope I don't see anything like that I would be shocked

    13. Re:Well... by sponga · · Score: 1

      well judging by this article nothing has changed over there http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20050 127/wl_afp/chinatiananmenpoliticspetitioners_05012 7114011

    14. Re:Well... by ZhuLien · · Score: 0, Redundant

      What about the good things about China? Like the fact that you can buy most hollywood movies 'in Government run shops" for about AU$1 each! Or the fact that living there knowing the government is nice enough not to go to Iraq pre-emptively and kill lots of civilians?

    15. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      assuming you're an abc, the way you're talking about china would have ME prejudiced against you too.

    16. Re:Well... by xSauronx · · Score: 1
      go to hsn.com and order a knife

      you'll have it in a few days without any type of problem: it's amazingly simple. you can do the same at pretty much any place online that sells any type of cutlery. clickety-click and you can have any number of knives or in a few days.

      You can go to martial arts equipment sites and do the same to get various weaponry, as long as it isn't illegal in your state.

      reconsider: it's very, very simple.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    17. Re:Well... by Chr0n0 · · Score: 2, Informative
      I just came back from China. Internet sucks, particularly outside of Beijing and Shanghai...
      You'll lose 25 pounds in two weeks. Be prepared for that. You'll probably also catch a cold your first week there.

      No wonder you lost 25 lbs in 2 weeks, you went North!
      Food in Southern China is much better IMHO, I gained 20lbs during my 1 year stay in Guangzhou.
      The city itself is very dirty though (Guangdong province is sort of an industrial province), that was back in 2000. From what my friends who recently came back from there told me, looks like its a much cleaner place to live now.

      Also, if you're living in major cities in China (i.e: Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou), transportation is really easy, there's almost always a dozen different ways just to get to a location.

    18. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you be of American Nationality and Chinese Nationality at the same time. For those who don't realise, Chinese is *not* a race. People of China are made up by many races. Chinese is a Nationality!

      Thank you for asserting the nationality of Taiwan.

    19. Re:Well... by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      No, it isn't.

      There's this thing called immigration. You're born in China, you immigrate to the US, you apply for US citizenship and renounce your Chinese citizenship. *bam* American born Chinese.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    20. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The key term is 'American-born'. If you're born in China, you're born in China. Renouncing your citizenship doesn't change the place of your birth.

    21. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinese can be considered an ethnicity, hence American born Chinese.

      Chinese as ethnicity.
      Chinese as race.
      Chinese as nationality.

      Unfortunatley, the use of these is inconsistent.

    22. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't doubt your statement that China covers many peoples. However, for many of us born here, the precise location and genetic affiliation of our ancestors is somewhat murky. As I'm sure you're aware, it's difficult to retain a full knowledge of one's heritage when placed in the middle of the melting pot, especially when all accounts of this heritage are second hand.

      'Chinese', or 'Vietnamese', or what-have-you, for far too many nisei and later generations, is as close as it gets.

    23. Re:Well... by nutznboltz · · Score: 1
      China's going to be changing the way it pegs the RMB soon.

      So far the only step China has taken to cool down growth is raising certain interest caps a bit.

      If they were to just revalue their currency who knows what would happen.

      For China, revaluation now poses an unacceptable risk. No one knows for sure how much any currency is over- or under-valued. Estimates of the yuan's under-valuation range from 10 per cent to 40 per cent.

      China fears that, if it simply re-pegs its currency, it will not convince financial markets that the new value is the equilibrium one.

      This might then invite more speculation as to further movements of the currency, destabilising it and discouraging capital account liberalisation.

      Worse, as the equilibrium value of the US dollar is also not known, it might continue to fall - especially if the Chinese withdraw funds from the US bond market as their export earnings fall - causing the yuan to once again become 'under-valued' and spurring yet more pressure for a further revaluation.

      China Daily
    24. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There's this thing called immigration. You're born in China, you immigrate to the US, you apply for US citizenship and renounce your Chinese citizenship. *bam* American born Chinese."

      American BORN Chinese. As in BORN IN AMERICA.

      It refers to a person, born in America, who is of Chinese descent.

    25. Re:Well... by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

      Thick blue jeans from Walmart

      Seeing as they are made in China by slave labour, they should be pretty cheap over there...

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    26. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh, I have a 8" chef's knife(Henckles) that I use for cooking purposes for times like cutting celery or onions. Is that a weapon? Many people who move overseas mail some of their belongings since the airlines don't allow 7 pieces of luggage.

    27. Re:Well... by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      I hear that CMM has even more problems than ABC.

    28. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      illegal? shoot, you can buy switch blades on ebay.

    29. Re:Well... by xiashunkai · · Score: 1

      i am sitting before a computer located in wuhan university which is one of the famouse university of china. and i am pure chinese.also i am a slashdotter. you can access www.slashdot.org in china as you do in you homeland. there is really some website and forbidden area which do harm to our goverment and CCP. but it is not a problem to Nerds, so feel free to come to china. welcome!

      --
      Wir mussen wissen, Wir werden wissen
    30. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm sorry, but I don't think I would consider mailing knives a "simple thing". A hat, sure; a weapon, no."

      Well, that's just dumb. What if it was an OddJob RazorHat?

      And what do you use when you need to open a box or peel a potato?

    31. Re:Well... by Cosmo+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      I use knives almost every day but I don't normally consider them to be weapons. That is such a different point of view. Interesting how different people are.

    32. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it is. My wife is born Chinese, now an American citizen. She travels to China all the time, they treat her like she's Chinese (and they really have no idea she's not until I show up).

      I know what ABC means because many native born Chinese (my wife and her friends unfortunately included) really don't like ABCs and aren't shy about it. It's quite clear, ABCs are 1st generation american-born children from chinese parents. Why? It's really not all that interesting. Native Chinese think ABCs are arrogant. ABCs want to fit in to their peers, who are American. It's really no different than any other ethnic group. There's often a "first generation rift", and it's very real.

      On a side note, most Chinese born people I've met (quite a lot now) in the 10-30 age range do not hate the Chinese government, and don't understand those who do. Most of their parents however, do. My wife's grandmother (who still lives in China) loathes, detests, despises and in all senses hates the Chinese government. For this reason it's always wise to be careful about sharing opinions, especially those heavily based on often clueless American media.

    33. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or the fact that living there knowing the government is nice enough not to go to Iraq pre-emptively and kill lots of civilians?

      And what the hell's wrong with going to Iraq and pre-emptively killing lots of civilians? Commie!

    34. Re:Well... by cerberusss · · Score: 1
      If you are ABC

      Anonymous Coward, only he's black?

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    35. Re:Well... by toogreen · · Score: 1
      Come one now, that's a pretty depressing description. Ok, perhaps outside of Beijing and Shanghai it can be a bit like that, but man, you make this look pretty shit and scary for anyone who never visited China. It's not ALL that bad and China definately has its share of nice and cool little things that can make life very enjoyable.

      Anyways, I'm in Shanghai right now and as you said it's pretty different here from the rest of China... I really do enjoy life here in Shanghai and there's almost no websites I don't have access to... All that comes to my mind now is BBC news. With my really fast and cheap cable connection I can go to all the other sites I want, no problem. There's always anonymous proxy servers anyways that solves the problem if there's any.

      China's cool people, I've been here for 2 years now and definately staying for a while... Not to mention the amazing number of gorgeous ladies in shanghai... ;) Go take a look at the pics there and you'll see what I mean... ;) http://www.smartshanghai.com/en/nightlife/gallerie s.php

    36. Re:Well... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A weapon? How about a tool or a work of art?

      Mailing a knife (at least within the US) isn't very difficult at all. I personally would prefer it stay that way even though there are some really screwed up people who would love to tell me what I am and am not allowed to do.

      Mailing a knife hurts noone. That knife is harmless in a box being transported from one place to another.

      A bomb is a different story.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    37. Re:Well... by PatientZero · · Score: 1
      A bomb is a different story.

      Look, I've already explained this to your supervisors, so I'm only going to tell you once.

      The detonator was disconnected and wrapped in a protective cloth!

      Sheesh, where am I . . . China?

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
    38. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Shoot, and me without mod points.

      Oh well, could you pass the bong please? :D

    39. Re:Well... by Narcocide · · Score: 0, Troll

      but... how's this significantly different than post-9/11 america when the republicans are in office?

    40. Re:Well... by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      Heh. I'd have to wonder what the police think of you sending encrypted information to and from the US...

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    41. Re:Well... by Kosi · · Score: 1

      butcher knife you use to cut your meat is illegal.

      How do they cut meat and other things then in china?

      If you are ABC

      -v please.

      You'll lose 25 pounds in two weeks.

      Why? I just lost 18 kg in the last 4 months, more and I'll be invisible. And from my visits to malaysia I know that I like the chinese food very much (always gained weight when I was there).

      It's a cold winter over there right now.

      Over where in china? I imagine that a country this big will have different climate zones. :-)

      Pocket knives are a good idea.

      This is Slashdot, the correct term is "Leatherman". But how does it improve your safety?

    42. Re:Well... by Whiteout · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Some interesting travel advice.

      "The communists will make your life hell." Certainly Chinese officialdom can be very officious, but it doesn't have anything to do with communism. Remember that China is an almost-Fascist dictatorship in all but name.

      "...catch a cold in your first week there." You probably got that on the plane, though it's true though that when you travel you're exposed to strains of viruses/bacteria for which you have no immunity.

      "Expect to be cold most of the time." How about tropical southern China? Remember that China's climate is more diverse than the US's. And this post is +5...

      "Watch your wallet." I've skipped a few of your choice quotes, but you're basically fear-mongering after a nasty bout of culture-shock, as far as I can see. China - and Asia in general - is very much safer than the US in all ways, though tourists do tend to be targets for opportunistic crimes. Think about it, people: there's an amazing world out there to visit, and it's safe and cheap (avoiding choice parts of Africa and Latin America).

      "Take amoxillician." I'm guessing you mean prophylactically? Don't do that - you give your immune system no chance to build up it's defences and you increase selectional pressures which generate antibiotic resistance. Carry a good antibiotic, but only use it if you have to.

      "Pocket knives are a good idea." Ok, I've only just got to reading this bit. The poster is a fool. China is SAFE, and that's partly a bi-product of the totalitarian regime and draconian law enforcement.

    43. Re:Well... by hatredman · · Score: 1

      Read above, it's already answered.

      --
      Hatredman
    44. Re:Well... by hondan53 · · Score: 1

      I am Chinese. I was born in China and moved to the US when I was 8. Anyway, I just came back from a trip to China, and I had a blast. Unfortunately, it is true that the Internet connection is quite slow there, even if you are on DSL. However, it is only a small price to pay for all of the fun you will have.

      Don't believe any of these people talking down about China, like the communist is out to get you or something, because in reality, the country itself is actually developing in to a capitalistic society (aka. Money Talks) and no government official is out to get you, unless if you do something that you are not supposed to do (like sending knives through postal mail, I am pretty sure US Postal service will give you hell about it too). China really isn't bad. I have enjoyed every minute there, and I did not notice any "loss of freedom" while I was in China.

      there are Internet cafes everywhere in China as well, and the government is supposedly regulating these places, but when you have one or two Internet cafes per city block, regulation is really more easily said than done. I was able to get to any websites that I normally go to, so there you go.

      I did not personally have this problem, but unfortunately, you will have to watch out for pick pockets in China, but all you have to do is either put your wallet inside of your jacket or put it in the front of your pants. make sure you didn't lose anything if anyone bumps into you.

      It will also help if you have a native guide, because alot of the business owners there will try to rip off foreign visitors. Alway bargin for a better price. If the vendor asks for 30 Yuan for an item, you will have to offer him 5 Yuan, and then work from there. It is ridiculous how much some of these "mark-ups" can be.

      Anyway, for the most part, I think you will enjoy your visit. Great food, great entertainment, and an absolutely fantastic experience. I am still excited when I talk about it. Good luck in China and I hope you will enjoy your visit as much as I did.

    45. Re:Well... by mibus · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but I don't think I would consider mailing knives a "simple thing". A hat, sure; a weapon, no.

      Whoah, when did knives suddenly get classified as weapons?

      Last I checked they were normally classified as "kitchen utensils"...

    46. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You call that a knife? This is a knife.

  2. R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by fembots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What methods and technologies are you aware of or use to circumvent the Great Firewall of China?

    Somehow I don't think it's wise to do such circumvention if you want to stay there short-term/long-term/permanently.

    What would US officials think if a foreigner, who is planning to move to USA, talks about how stupid the whole security thing is, and asks for advice to get around it?

    If USA can attack another country "Just Like That"(tm), I would consider Chinese's censorship a godsend given it's only imposed within its own country. If you decided to move there, respect its laws; if you don't agree with its laws, go somewhere else. You always have a choice.

    At home I have unlimited access to the internet, but at work I can only access port 80, and I would never try to get around company's security policy because it's restricting my freedom to surf, although others might still try that.

    And remember, when you get caught, it's going to be ugly no matter where you are.

    So in my opinion, if you want to go into other's territory, make sure you find out what can and cannot be done there, and stick to the rules.

    1. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by E2Hawkeye · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So, I take it that never attempting to make things better for yourself or others is part of your personal belief system?

      "I would consider Chinese's censorship a godsend given it's only imposed within its own country."

      I am having a hard time deciding if you are trolling or not....

    2. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by LucBorg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I couldn't agree more. Well said!

    3. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by geoffspear · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If Hitler can murder 12 million people, I consider Stalin to be a godsend, because he's only killing Soviets.

      Nope, doesn't work.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    4. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by toggles · · Score: 0

      but at work I can only access port 80, and I would never try to get around company's

      http://www.agroman.net/corkscrew/

    5. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by damian+cosmas · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Somehow I don't think it's wise to do such circumvention if you want to stay there short-term/long-term/permanently."

      Actually, that seems like one of the easiest ways to stay there permanently.

    6. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by mopower70 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Somehow I don't think it's wise to do such circumvention if you want to stay there short-term/long-term/permanently.

      Then again, that might be just the way to stay there long-term/permanently.

    7. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Hitler did kill 20 million Soviets. Not to mention Poles, Dutch, Ukranians . . . so that's kind of a bad analogy.

      More like asking advice on how to smuggle Whiskey into Saudia Arabia.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    8. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by utlemming · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Somehow I don't think it's wise to do such circumvention if you want to stay there short-term/long-term/permanently.
      If you engage in that sort of thing, then you are pretty much accepting that sort of relationship. The question is whether your deported immediately, held for a time, then deported, or put in prision for a long-time.

      What I think people need to get past is the idea that their political culture and ideas are both acceptable and compatiable with other cultures. The United States and other western countries all have very incompatable world views when it comes countries like China. The only reason that the United States and China can get along is due to the trade relationship.

      There is only one place in China that you enjoy the freedoms that your looking for -- Hong Kong. When China assumed ownership of Hong Kong there were fears that the financial strength of the former British colony would suffer. Hong Kong was granted certain freedoms that the rest of China does not enjoy.

      However, when traveling to another country you must RESPECT that country. You are a guest, just as your a guest in someone's home. Failure to obey the rules of that country is rude, inconsiderate and frankly, you deserve whatever punishment is given for violations. It is arrogent to assume that you have the same rights and priveleages that you enjoy here in another country. Further, if you really want to enjoy such privelages, then stay. Part of leaving for that job is the cost of losing some of your freedoms. And just because your a citizen of XXXXXX doesn't mean that your country will bail you out in the event of a problem.

      --
      The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
    9. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Otter · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Inflammatory comments about the US aside, parent is absolutely correct.

      Screwing around with the legal system of China isn't like wearing a deCSS t-shirt and thinking you're some sort of badass revolutionary. They have those restrictions because they intend them to be obeyed. If you're a citizen of a major country, probably nothing really bad will happen to you, but just getting deported will have dire effects on your future travel plans.

      If you genuinely want to be a freedom fighter there, good luck. But judging from the frivolity of your post "here on slash-o-dot", you really seem to have no idea what you're getting into.

    10. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by KDN · · Score: 1

      Censorship we know about. Communist rule is more like an oligarchy, just ask Hong Kong.
      They rewrite history, just look at what happened to that former leader that just died. They threaten other countries, just look at Taiwan. They destroy cultural identities that are not their own, look at Tibet.

    11. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by clone22 · · Score: 1

      You left out the forced organ donation option, bullet to the base of the skull. Have fun.

      --
      Ask me about my vow of silence!
    12. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Naikrovek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Killing people is killing people. Doesn't matter if they're gay, Jewish, whatever. Any leader that kills people because of any reason other than war (and even war is iffy in some cases) is .. well there is no word for that kind of evil, that i know of.

      saying stalin was better than hitler is like saying "Being killed by falling into a giant puddle of lava is better than being killed by falling into a giant puddle of molten lead." they're both very, very, very bad and probably very very painful, even if just for a moment.

      killing people is wrong no matter how you look at it. kill one person out of hatred and you are no different than someone that has killed millions out of hatred.

    13. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes, yes and yes! They do all sort of dirty things, but as parent post stated, you always have a choice not to go there, that's why I don't go to USA.

    14. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by danknight · · Score: 1

      More like asking advice on how to smuggle Whiskey into Saudia Arabia. 1 Smuggle Whiskey 2 try not to lose your head 3 Profit!

      --
      wanted: one clever sig,apply within
    15. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by 91degrees · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, I take it that never attempting to make things better for yourself or others is part of your personal belief system?

      He can make things better for himself by not going to China. As for other people - Well, he's not doing anything for them, but even if he wanted to, in this case, its up to other people to make it better for themselves rather than have some foreigner telling them how to do things. While it's far from a free country, most people in China are fairly happy with the way things are run.

    16. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Impressive to see a /. who is thinking beyond their own immediate world!

      Even more impressive, he/she's not the only one!!

      If these replies are a typical cut, then we're much better of that I thought.

      It's one thing to try to work around some a-hole who's just trying to stop people. It's quite another to violate the laws of the land. I moved to the US from Sweden because I don't agree with the mediocre views (I feel) people have there.

      I love the ability to work hard and get something for it. So I live in the US.

    17. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Frymaster · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I am having a hard time deciding if you are trolling or not....

      actually, i'm having a hard time deciding whether the original poster, cliff, is a cop from china. posting a request for chinese citizens to publicly state:

      1. that they are breaking the law
      2. and explain how they are doing it
      sounds a bit like a sting operation to me. if i were a citizen of china and i could get throught he great firewall, i sure as hell wouldn't be talking about it on slashdot.

      now... where did i put that tinfoil hat?

    18. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, knowing people working in Cuba, exceptions are made for the Ex-Pats, including lesser filtering on web content (or more likely, access to lightly filtered web content, as opposed to no access). Also, over in the Middle East, other sorts of accomodations with regards to local laws/customs are made for Ex-Pat's (especially within compounds).

      Have you looked into the situation you are moving into in China? I assume that you are going in as an Ex-Pat with a formal commercial relationship, in which case they may try to accomodate you.

    19. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by rewt66 · · Score: 1
      kill one person out of hatred and you are no different than someone that has killed millions out of hatred.

      Well, in absolute moral terms, no, I suppose not. You're still guilty of the same heinous crime. But...

      There is a large difference in how much they affect other people. You're (probably) all right living in the next town from the person who kills one person out of hatred. You're in much more danger living in the next country from the person who kills millions out of hatred.

    20. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by dfn5 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      However, when traveling to another country you must RESPECT that country. You are a guest, just as your a guest in someone's home. Failure to obey the rules of that country is rude, inconsiderate and frankly, you deserve whatever punishment is given for violations.

      To illustrate your point let's look at the United States. When people visit our country and overstay their welcome our government punishes them by giving them the right to vote. Hey, wait a minute...

      --
      -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    21. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by LordNightwalker · · Score: 1

      well there is no word for that kind of evil, that i know of.

      Yes there is... Badong...

      --
      Install windows on my workstation? You crazy? Got any idea how much I paid for the damn thing?
    22. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or how to crack adobe e-books or download MP3s in the US.

    23. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I think people need to get past is the idea that their political culture and ideas are both acceptable and compatiable with other cultures.

      There was a cartoon in C.H. some time ago showing a Chinese man being tortured by the police. A representative of the UN walks in (white, dressed in a suit); the prisoner starts yelling ``please respect my cultural identity and my right to be tortured.''

    24. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Otter · · Score: 1
      Well, knowing people working in Cuba, exceptions are made for the Ex-Pats, including lesser filtering on web content (or more likely, access to lightly filtered web content, as opposed to no access).

      In fact, Cuba has recently banned most residential dial-up Internet access. (I submitted that story as an YRO article; naturally, it was rejected in favor of the zillionth round of "RIAA says mean things about file sharers!" whining.)

      But, yeah, you're absolutely right about expats having enclaves of relative freedom. The point is the same, though -- if you're in a foreign country, you play by the rules they set, not by the ones you think ought to pertain to you.

    25. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by xstonedogx · · Score: 1

      Failure to obey the rules of that country is rude, inconsiderate and frankly, you deserve whatever punishment is given for violations.

      This assumes, of course, that we share your belief that following rules made by men is more important than your God-given rights. I'm not sure why you (and the grandparent) equate respecting a culture with following the rules made by whatever power structure happens to be in place at the time.

      In any case, I don't think anyone deserves to be raped or tortured for any reason, much less for making use of freedoms no government on earth has any right or authority to take away.

      Our cultures and beliefs may be incompatible with those of the Chinese, but that does not mean we lose those rights or waive those rights if we decide to move to China. It just means we might have to fight for those rights or find clever means to practice those rights in or around the rules.

    26. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by lahvak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      However, when traveling to another country you must RESPECT that country. You are a guest, just as your a guest in someone's home. Failure to obey the rules of that country is rude, inconsiderate and frankly, you deserve whatever punishment is given for violations.

      I agree with you that a traveler to another country should respect the country, its people and culture. However, as I have learned when I grew up in communist Czechoslovakia, and as those of us who are living in the US are learning now, respecting a country is definitely not the same as respecting its government!

      --
      AccountKiller
    27. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by the0ther · · Score: 0

      Tell this to all the Mexicans coming over our southern border illegally. It's complete bullshit to tell somebody to respect the laws of a brutal communist state such as China. Respect is earned, and those commies in charge of the Chinese government deserve none. What kind of dolt are you anyway? Do not respect the laws of China. As if your government will let China imprison a US citizen on political crimes. Fuck the Chinese.

    28. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by sloanster · · Score: 4, Informative
      Hitler did kill 20 million Soviets.

      ...and it's estimated that Stalin himself killed 60 million soviets, if I remember Solzhenitsyn correctly.

    29. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      still remember this? basically there is nothing you can do about it.

    30. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually the government doesn't 'give' them the right to vote. By law the only people who can vote are citizens (either natural born or naturalized). Some non-citizens end up voting primarily because of clerical errors or fraud, and a lack of enforcement on the government's side. It's a two way deal -- a lack of respect on the individual's side, and an excess of apathy (or a lack of ability to enforce) on the government's.

      But keep in mind this isn't something exclusive to the US. All countries face problems like this.

    31. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by RancidBeef · · Score: 1

      You may have a "right" to walk down a dark alley at night, but if you know a mugger is hiding there you might want to think again. You may have a moral right to access whatever you want while there, but the totalitarian government there might toss you ass in jail with no recourse anyway. Pick your battles carefully.

    32. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Government's don't own the planet or represent the people. They are simply gangs who ended up with the biggest guns in a given place and have taken control. Most of the time, it's worth putting up with them and paying half of your income as protection money, because you don't want to use a gun yourself and most of the time they will fight off smaller gangs for you. But what they don't deserve is respect. People deserve respect. If you are at a friends house and she doesn't want to see you browsing porno, by all means stop. But what you are looking at in your own room, behind closed door, is noone's business. If some thugs with guns want to control you to assert their dominance and you can trick them, force the to give up, or find a place with a bit nicer thugs, all the more power to you.

      Oh, and democracy doesn't really represent people, because hundreds of millions can not be expected to immediately understand a new idea. Now if I could get together with a bunch of friends and decide to live in a certain way and then whoever liked it could join and live by different rules than Republicrats, it would be real representation.

    33. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by SiliconEntity · · Score: 1

      If USA can attack another country "Just Like That"(tm), I would consider Chinese's censorship a godsend given it's only imposed within its own country. If you decided to move there, respect its laws; if you don't agree with its laws, go somewhere else. You always have a choice.

      I can't believe that people are agreeing with this sentiment. It's one thing to say that it may be unwise or unsafe to plan on breaking Chinese laws, given their lack of civil liberties, their arbitrary legal system, their authoritarian government, and their reliance on personal power rather than the rule of law. I agree that it's risky. But it's entirely another to suggest that it is morally wrong to go to China and seek to oppose or circumvent unjust laws!

      The only people we should respect in this situation are those who are brave enough to oppose Chinese censorship from within the country. These people are putting their livelihoods and even their very lives on the lines! They are like the Russian refuseniks and dissidents who paid a terrible price for their opposition to their country's policies.

      Any suggestion that the Chinese government deserves respect is completely misguided. Unlike in Western democracies, China has no system of accountability to the public. Its policies are purely designed to protect the entrenched power structure which runs the country. This is an evil and immoral system of government! The laws it passes have no moral force. Their system of censorship is purely intended to keep the truth from the Chinese people and keep the government in power.

      We saw what happened when the Soviet Union tried their policy of perestroika and glasnost, openness, and allowed the media to operate freely. The resulting explosion of criticism and free speech brought the government to an end. The Chinese government fears this outcome. They know that if their people become able to communicate freely, they face the same danger.

      So please, don't suggest that the government of China deserves "R.E.S.P.E.C.T." It deserves nothing but contempt. I'm not saying that it is a good idea to go there and break the laws, any more than doing so would be a good idea in any other authoritarian regime. But that's a matter of self preservation, not morality. The only people who deserve our respect are those who are taking chances to overcome Chinese censorship and bring the truth to the Chinese people.

    34. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by sp3d2orbit · · Score: 1

      However, when traveling to another country you must RESPECT that country

      Bullshit. Saying this is like saying, "If you don't like Nazi Germany, just don't go there." I'm sick of this Laissez Faire attitude towards China and their abuses of the Rights of Man. Its arrogant to think that Westerners are entitled to the freedoms we have, while people in oppressed cultures should let be.

      At some point in the future China will the dominant economic force in the world. It will be much harder at that point for any country/individual/ngo to coerce China into entering the free world. At the point when China dictates international politics do you think it will respect your culture? Look to Tibet (http://www.freetibet.org/) for an example of how much China respects other cultures, and to Hong Kong (http://www.fidh.org/article.php3?id_article=846) to see how it will respect your democracy.

      "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."

    35. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by bgog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Obey, perhaps, respect? I don't think so. Your statment was well made but if I travel to some country that stones women for adulty you can't tell me that I MUST RESPECT them.

      I agree that if you break the rules in another country you deserve what you get but in my opinion you certainly do not have to respect them.

      There is a big difference between compliance and respect. Respect is earned.

    36. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      However, when traveling to another country you must RESPECT that country. You are a guest, just as your a guest in someone's home. Failure to obey the rules of that country is rude, inconsiderate and frankly, you deserve whatever punishment is given for violations.

      Wait, wait, should I be respecting the country's government, or its population? In the case of China, the former would mean not bringing in banned games, saying nice things about Three Gorges, and generally being quiet. The latter would mean buying shitloads of pirated games and DVDs and chatting with people from all over the world over the internet about whatever I want. Which kind of respect is good, and which kind makes me deserve a stay in jail?

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    37. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Saying stalin was better than hitler is like saying "Being killed by falling into a giant puddle of lava is better than being killed by falling into a giant puddle of molten lead."

      But falling into lava is better!

    38. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by xgamer04 · · Score: 1

      If you're a citizen of a major country

      As opposed to a citizen of a minor country? Methinks US imperialism has taken the minds of its citizens... (except me, of course)

      --
      When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
    39. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1
      To illustrate your point let's look at the United States. When people visit our country and overstay their welcome our government punishes them by giving them the right to vote. Hey, wait a minute...

      Ahh, gotta love mobocracy, where whoever can buy the most votes, wins. Where cynical politicians can swell their constituencies by granting amnesty to illegals, thereby winning the undying gratitude of not only impoverished Mexicans, but the agricultural interests who employ them. It's all so...so Athenian.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    40. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by vertinox · · Score: 1

      However, when traveling to another country you must RESPECT that country. You are a guest, just as your a guest in someone's home. Failure to obey the rules of that country is rude, inconsiderate and frankly, you deserve whatever punishment is given for violations.

      Unless of course I bring along 500,000 of my buddies armed with the latest anti-personnel technology, then all bets are off.

      (And no, this isn't a jab at the US in Iraq but a realist statement of history and warfare between foreign powers in general. Kind of like how it's wrong to kill a man unless you have the go ahead from your society, government, or religion. It's just Ironic.)

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    41. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Non-Citizens do vote legally in local elections in some areas of the US.

    42. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by MoggyMania · · Score: 1

      "When people visit our country and overstay their welcome our government punishes them by giving them the right to vote."

      At least immigrants are required to demonstrate knowledge of our political system and national history before being granted the right to vote through citizenship. That's a great deal more than can be said of the majority of people that were given voting rights simply because they were born here.

    43. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Whatever.

      My point stands. If you think you've scored a point off me, go pin a medal on yourself.

    44. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Bloater · · Score: 1

      There's little difference between some guy in some small town in China and some guy in some small town in Sweden. If it is morally unacceptable treatment to apply to the guy in Sweden, then it is morally unacceptable treatment to apply to the guy in China. After all, I'm sure it's not the Chinese guy's fault that he is subject to the whims of an authoritarian power centre.

      You can't just say it is okay because it is the authoritarian power centre's geographic area to do whatever they wish to the people it is beneath. The reason for that is that it is not the authoritarian power centre's geographic area, it belongs to the people that need the land to survive (especially since the power centre itself claims to be communist).

      To take your alternative situation as an example. If somebody believes the US security measures to be fundamentally immoral, then they should feel free to *try* to circumvent them. If they get caught and killed for no gain, then they are obviously stupid, but they should still feel free to *try* to circumvent them. I beleive that nobody should tell them that they should not do it simply because the law in that area says it shouldn't be done. That is unless you are arguing that the mere existence of such a law changes the nature of the proscribed action to be immoral, though I don't pretend to say that you shouldn't tell him he'd be bloody dumb to try ;) or that he shouldn't do it because his actions would result in a grossly immoral consequence.

      The goal of good people should be to try to educate through example and unguided discussion on moral issues. Forced imprinting onto infants should be left to the parents, who should be educated in the manner above to encourage them to imprint whatever moral values you hold dear by convincing them that they are moral values that their children should hold dear too.

      Nobody who holds strong liberal moral convictions should be complacent. So I encourage the poster to follow whatever course of action I deem not to be immoral :) Accessing material (where the accessing of which doesn't unreasonably encourage the breach of important moral values) is, in general, absolutely fine. Even if somebody with no right to stop you tells you that you are not allowed and tries to stop you. But don't be dumb, do think about the consequences.

    45. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by hdparm · · Score: 1
      He isn't but you are. His full sentence read:

      If USA can attack another country "Just Like That"(tm), I would consider Chinese's censorship a godsend given it's only imposed within its own country.

      See the difference?

    46. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cliff is the guy who posted the article, Solo Han is the one who wrote it. Mistakes like that make you unworthy of that tinfoil hat, methinks.

    47. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Misanthropy · · Score: 1

      As opposed to a citizen of a minor country?

      Well actually...yes

      I don't think many people would disagree that if you are from US, UK, France, Germany, etc. You are from a major country. As in, a country that has significant influence among the countries of the world. You think a citizen of a minor (or less influential if you prefer) country would have a chance in hell unless their country appealed to one of the major countries (or possibly UN)?

      It's not so much the ranting of "arrogant imperialists" as it is just stating the truth.

    48. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Panaflex · · Score: 1
      So in my opinion, if you want to go into other's territory, make sure you find out what can and cannot be done there, and stick to the rules.

      Yeah, that's what Ghandi did in South Africa.

      Pan

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    49. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by freedom_india · · Score: 1
      This is NOT, REPEAT NOT, a US bashing discussion. All he wanted to know how to deal with China's Orwellian Govt. and what freedoms (basic stuff like speech, net access google, etc) can he have and what he cannot.

      You obviously thought it that since he referred to China's Great Firewall and it's limited personal freedoms, it's a grave insult to China.

      Let's face facts dude: Chinese Govt. is as orwellian as can be. They "control" their citizens lives to some extent, to a lesser extent than USSR.

      He was Right, Absolutely Right in asking what freedoms he might lose if he moved to China.

      The very fact that you are able to bash US without your IP being traced and you & your family being sent to Gulag talks a LOT about US freedoms. Can you guarantee that in China?

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    50. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

      If you genuinely want to be a freedom fighter there, good luck. But judging from the frivolity of your post "here on slash-o-dot", you really seem to have no idea what you're getting into.

      Lack of respect for the host culture is just the beginning of this dingbat's character flaws.

      The really ugly part of this, IMHO, is his apparently total lack of interest in the restrictions that the average Chinese must live under. He's fine if he can get his jollies, and that's the end of his considerations.

      Let's just say that if he gets busted for casually flouting the laws of mainland China, I won't be joining any letter-writing campaigns to secure his release. There are too many brave Chinese rotting in jails and labor camps for the crime of demanding freedom to worry about some twit who wants to live the privileged life while he's sucking up the dineros from their jailers.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    51. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But it's entirely another to suggest that it is morally wrong to go to China and seek to oppose or circumvent unjust laws!

      Who are you to tell the Chinese what their morals should be? What if they don't like your morals? How would you feel if they wanted to impose their morals on you?

      How do you feel about Singapore? It has a democratically elected government based on English common law AND and rampant censorship that, despite some recent minor erosion, is generally supported by the public. Would it be morally wrong to oppose censorship there?

      Self-righteous Westerners who think their way is the only morally correct way are the reason Westerners are so unwelcome -- by both governments and people -- in so many parts of the world.

    52. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Infinity+Salad · · Score: 1

      Not in the fashion implied by the uber-parent. 'Non citizens' can include quite a wide range of legal immigrants; some of them can vote whether you are in the US or EU.

    53. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by SacredNaCl · · Score: 1

      Look, on a practical level, you don't want to get arrested in a foreign country. This isn't Mexico of the 1980's where you could slip the guy a $50 and the problem disappears. (Though I hear Russia is like that now.)

      Being an American wont protect you from the laws abroad. What may be a small fine over there for them, may be a long stay in jail and a forced deportation through a slow administrative process for you - we are starting to do the same thing here over minor law violations to guest workers. You need to become familiar with the punishments they dole out, and do your best to get along & go along.

      --
      Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
    54. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Qa1 · · Score: 1
      If you decided to move there, respect its laws; if you don't agree with its laws, go somewhere else. You always have a choice.

      I find it bizare that the very same people who would go into convulsions if their local government banned even a single website, encourage others to "accept" and even "respect" a policy of a tyrannical foreign government whose only purpose is to stifle free speech, disrupt the natural flow of information to the masses and the power that comes with it.

      You tell him "if you don't agree with its laws, go somewhere else. You always have a choice." Well, when your local government will prevent you from visiting sites it doesn't like, we would tell you the same thing: "go somewhere else. You always have a choice."

      Except eventually, there won't be any choice. not if everyone "respects" laws that violate some of the most basic human rights.

      Remember, the people in China (and everywhere else) basically want the same things as you: basic right, including the right to consume available information. Assuming that they don't is actually pretty condescending ("yeah, we civilized folks can't have our informative websites blocked, but those barbarians over at China are probably satisfied with having enough rice to fill their belly...")

    55. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by mrpeebles · · Score: 1

      Respecting another country means not smoking outside public buildings, or eating with chopsticks, or trying to speak the native language. I also believe that respecting another country means not making the decision for its citizens that hundreds of thousands of them will die in the overthrow of their dictator. This has nothing to do with inalienable rights. Cultural relativism does not justify the powerful ruling the weak simply because they are powerful, and it does not justify the powerful intentionally keeping information from the weak to keep them weak. If a culture is "incompatible" with this notion, it must change itself. Unfortunately, freedom is often used to mean "to have a choice." This is not always the case. However, the right for a person to pursue new ideas transcends country or culture. Of course, it seems pretty stupid to me to knowingly break the law in China or any other foreign country.

    56. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      That is true. That is one of the un-spoken genocides. Stalin was just as brutal and inhumane as Hitler yet most people in this country (US) have no idea about that, heck they probably think Stalin is just a brand of Vodka

    57. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "G7" doesn't refer to a future Mac processor, ya know?

    58. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      s/China/USA and you get:

      Censorship we know about. Capitalist rule is more like an oligarchy, just ask File sharers. They rewrite history, just look at what happened to that first leader that died. They threaten other countries, just look at Iraq/Iran. They destroy cultural identities that are not their own, look at Japan.

    59. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... at least if you want to stay there for the rest of your life, however long that may be.

    60. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by drooling-dog · · Score: 1
      Somehow I don't think it's wise to do such circumvention if you want to stay there short-term/long-term/permanently.

      True enough, but my first thought about this post was that is was from the other side...

    61. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by anonymous_wombat · · Score: 1
      Take a look at the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

      Of course in practice it is not enforced, but China as a member state of the United Nations is bound by this to respect freedom of expression. This is not some Western viewpoint imposed on others.

    62. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      I love the ability to work hard and get something for it. So I live in the US.

      You already have your plane ticket for Canada, don't you?

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    63. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by utlemming · · Score: 1
      Saying this is like saying, "If you don't like Nazi Germany, just don't go there."

      Why would you voluntarily choose to go to a country that does not value the same rights you do. If you are going for employment than it means that you value econmic benefit more than rights.

      The "Rights of Man" are a culturally defined idea. Just because we have rights, doesn't give us the rights to force them on others. The Laissez Faire attitude that you are complaining about is just about allowing a people the Right of Self-determination -- which is a basic human right. The Chinese must decide that they want the right of self-determination enough to take it. Otherwise attempting to force that right, and other human rights on the Chinese will proof to be ineffecitve. You can't force a people to be free -- it isn't freedom, but another form of slavery. Forcing someone to an ideal that may be accpeted in Western Civilization on another country is no more acceptable than forcing Communism on us. The Soviets and the United States fought hard to keep each other's differing world views out of their countries.

      But based on your comments, then I would have to say that you support cultural imperialism. On your arguments, then the war in Iraq is justified. The war in Korea, too. In fact, any war that results in a "democratic" country is justified.

      --
      The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
    64. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I do. Thank you. It is a troll indeed.

    65. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO, Natalie Portman is NOT an insensitive clod?!
      Everyone makes mistakes.

    66. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by utlemming · · Score: 1

      Good research. However, the Declaration of Human Rights is not a document that binds -- it is not a treaty. Furthermore "the United Nations may not interfere in the domestic affairs of any state." The UN is "bound" to respect soviergn issues unless those issues leak out of the boarders of those nations. The UN can complain, but can not intervien.

      --
      The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
    67. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bravo

    68. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      When in Rome, do as the Romans do.

      --
      SRSLY.
    69. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have never really understood why trying to have someone like Saddam Hussain assassinated is wrong and yet killing thousands of his country men civilians and armed forces alike is OK.

    70. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any leader that kills people because of any reason other than war (and even war is iffy in some cases) is .. well there is no word for that kind of evil, that i know of.

      How about George W. Bush? He's killed a number of people outside wars, while he was the governor of Texas, by refusing to commute their death sentences to life imprisonment. There's no word for that kind of evil, eh?

    71. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, figure out how to circumvent all the security features and you will probably stay in China your whole life long - except that your whole life may not be very long.

    72. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      ... but at work I can only access port 80, and I would never try to get around company's security policy ...

      Huh? That's an insecurity policy.

      I've implemented similar policies at a couple of jobs, but the restriction was always to using port 443 (https). That way, various company sites could put things online for use by others in the company, but the packets would be encrypted, so outsiders couldn't spy on them. The firewalls would also put a few limits on the addresses of incoming port-443 connections, too.

      Usually we also opened outgoing connections to port 80, because there are lots of things (such as documentation) available online that we needed, at sites that didn't do https. But along with this went an ongoing educational campaign to teach people of the potential problems with unencrypted connections. Mostly this just means teaching them to never fill in any personal information in web forms unless they see that "https://" in the URL field.

      And, of course, there's the ongoing effort to make sure that all machines' browsers and mail readers have all scripting turned off. That's really the security biggie, especially if you have people running IE or Outlook. Such users visiting port-80 web sites can be open doors to all sorts of nasty stuff.

      They complain loudly, of course. But it's easy enough to create a few company web pages that do nasty (but recoverable) things to people who violate the rules, and entice people to visit those pages. Most of them learn fast ...

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    73. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word is Murder.

    74. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Being killed by falling into a giant puddle of lava is better than being killed by falling into a giant puddle of molten lead."

      So you're looking forward to Return of the Sith, too?

    75. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As he said, it's a matter of respect. You're welcome to complain about your own government. You're also welcome to complain about the Chinese government. But to travel to China with full intentions to ignore Chinese law seems inappropriate (unless it's part of a protest, I suppose).

      Would you accept a friend's dinner invitation and show up with your own food, because his cooking sucks? Generally you either don't go, or you shut up and eat it.

    76. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Linzer · · Score: 1
      very incompatable world views

      From Merriam-Webster dictionary:
      The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary. Click on a spelling suggestion below or try again using the search box to the right.

      Suggestions for compatable:
      1. compatible
      2. computable
      3. comparable
      4. compatibly
      5. compatibles
      6. commutable
      7. committable
      8. campestral
      9. Campobello
      10. computerless
      11. computerese
      --
      Gravitation is a theory, not a fact.
    77. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by mgs1000 · · Score: 1

      Let's stay on topic and remind everybody of the 30-80 million Chinese killed by Mao.

    78. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What I think people need to get past is the idea that their political culture and ideas are both acceptable and compatible with other cultures. The United States and other western countries all have very incompatable world views when it comes countries like China.
      This is impermissible. If George Bush catches wind of this , y'all better watch out. We Americans are hell-bent on forcing democracy down the throats of any non/less-democractic governments. First Iraq, then Iran ... watch out China, you might be next. Or are they in line after North Korea ? Oh yeah, we can take them all down AT THE SAME TIME. Ha Ha Ha !! Long live the United States of the Planet. Most earthlings believe democracy is preferable to other forms of governance. The rest will have to learn that not everyone wins in a democracy- it is simply meant to minimize the losers...
    79. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      I think you're beginning to get it.

    80. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try as I might to agree with you, I'm just not sure it's a god given right to read Google News.

    81. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by UnrefinedLayman · · Score: 0
      If USA can attack another country "Just Like That"(tm), I would consider Chinese's censorship a godsend given it's only imposed within its own country. If you decided to move there, respect its laws; if you don't agree with its laws, go somewhere else. You always have a choice.
      There's a difference between invading another country and taking it by force--killing tens of thousands of people in the process--and restricting Internet access. Your comparison is ridiculous, at best.

      Further, unjust laws remain unjust.
    82. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      What would US officials think if a foreigner, who is planning to move to USA, talks about how stupid the whole security thing is, and asks for advice to get around it?
      Nothing, because they know the whole thing is just bullshit.
    83. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      Let's stay on topic and remind everybody of the 30-80 million Chinese killed by Mao.
      Who gives a fuck? They were bourgeois!
    84. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1, Troll
      Hitler did kill 20 million Soviets.
      ...and it's estimated that Stalin himself killed 60 million soviets, if I remember Solzhenitsyn correctly.
      That is true. That is one of the un-spoken genocides. Stalin was just as brutal and inhumane as Hitler yet most people in this country (US) have no idea about that, heck they probably think Stalin is just a brand of Vodka Which proves that jews squeal the louder. No one gives a flying fuck about the people Stalin killed, yet everybody is kissing the jews' asses, and the jews know that, so everytime you cricitize one, you'll be labeled an antisemite. This is how the jews are escaping with murder in Gaza and Cis-Jordania.
    85. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      While I agree completely with you sentiments of your post, when you frame the debate in terms of "God-given" rights, you are at a disadvantage, as the bedrock of your argument rests on something that cannot be proven.

      What does a "God-given right" mean to an atheist, or an agnostic?

    86. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      The only reason that the United States and China can get along is due to the trade relationship.
      That's the best proof that the USA doesn't give a flying fuck about Democracy and human rights; all it cares about is Wall-Marde to sell their slave-labour made cheap crap from China.
    87. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll.

    88. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by MetaPhyzx · · Score: 1

      Censorship we know about. Japanese rule is more like an oligarchy, just ask the Filipinos. They rewrite history, just look at what happened to that emperor that died. They threaten other countries, just look at China/The U.S/Australia/Soviet Union/French Indochina/. They destroy cultural identities that are not their own, look at Korea.

      This kinda talk can go on about any nation. Regardless, China has had a harsh PURGING society. They are trying some form of Franken Commucapitalism. But personal freedoms, LIBERAL freedoms dont exist. Maybe it the sheer number of people that exist in the country, I dunno. But that doesnt absolve that government from what we percieve as it's faults, just as we... well at least I, criticize the US government. Which to me is my right as a citizen of the US.

      --
      Blacker than my baby girl's stare. Black like the veil that the muslimina wear. Black like the planet that they fear...
    89. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by willpall · · Score: 1

      So you and geoffspear agree then, right? You're making his point although I don't sense that you know this in your post.

      --
      Libertarian: label used by embarrassed Republicans, longing to be open about their greed, drug use and porn collections.
    90. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by AutoTheme · · Score: 1

      If USA can attack another country "Just Like That"(tm), I would consider Chinese's censorship a godsend given it's only imposed within its own country. ...respect its laws; if you don't agree with its laws, go somewhere else. You always have a choice.

      Here, here! Follow your own advice moron.

    91. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      That "whoosh" you heard was the sound of the point of the grandparent flying over your head at top speed :)

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    92. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by jiawen · · Score: 1
      So in my opinion, if you want to go into other's territory, make sure you find out what can and cannot be done there, and stick to the rules.

      A problem with this is that it assumes a system in which the rules are -- well, rules. Chinese societies are, to a large extent, not based on the rule of law but on the rule of relationships. It's not what the law says but who you know, in other words.

      People in Sinitic societies quite often have no "respect" for the law at all; laws are, in the Confucian formulation, the worst form of rule. The best ruler is one who rules by example, not by making laws. Try driving in Taiwan sometime and you'll see what I mean. Try getting permits to start a construction project in China and you'll see, too.

      That doesn't mean that a foreigner shouldn't be aware of the rules. The authorities will use them to their advantage when they can. Just don't expect the laws to mean much otherwise.

    93. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by tokabola · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, I take it that never attempting to make things better for yourself or others is part of your personal belief system?

      Do you mean like America has made Iraq better? It's not for most Iraqi citizens.

      The problem with "making things better" for other people is that your version of what's better isn't always the same as the other person's. Imposing your values on another is just plain wrong, and as far as you know the majority of chinese people are happy that pr0n sites (and the malware/viruses many of them contain) are blocked.

      AFAIK the United States Government still runs a proxy site specifically for chineese people who want to access the non-pr0n sites the Chinese government restricts. Not sure what the URL is these days, it's changed a couple times when the Chinese government has added it to the restricted list.

      Tommy
      --
      Open Source for Open Minds
    94. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Hitler made the world a better place. Pretty hard for Stalin to improve on that.

    95. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Changa_MC · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No one gives a flying fuck about the people Stalin killed, yet everybody is kissing the jews' asses,
      It's unfortunate that this viewpoint so unpopular that normal people won't even discuss it, because at first glance, it not an unreasonable conclusion. As a child, I wondered why the holocaust was played up more than other, bigger mass-murders, and no one would talk about it.

      So, let's glance again. Hitler killed 70% of an entire race. Sure, he killed more Soviets than Jews, but soviet culture was not in danger of ceasing to exist. Genocide is not killing a lot of people: Genocide is killing an entire culture/race of people, no matter how big or small that is.

      and the jews know that, so everytime you cricitize one, you'll be labeled an antisemite. This is how the jews are escaping with murder in Gaza and Cis-Jordania.
      But Israel does not represent all Jews, or the Jewish culture. Israel is just another violent theocracy among many others. I would point to American Jews as an example of how Judaism can be a non-violent religion. And I blame America for shaping current-day Israel into a violent nation.

      --
      Changa hates change.
    96. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you do inadvertantly wind up with
      a "longer than expected stay", do not
      expect Dubya's new-found respect for
      international "freedom" to come riding
      to your rescue ... it ain't gonna happen.

    97. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, Hitler really had 20million soviets in confinement and murdered them. No, that was an act of war and they were soldiers. Poles? Poland? May as well be soviets since that was part of Russia from sometime from 1795 until 1918. Then Ukranians? Well Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union! The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Quit confusing Soviets with Russians!

    98. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, lead has a lower melting point. So there is a chance that you may become a cast for a large lead statue.

    99. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am SO sick of this politcally correct bullsh*t I want to scream! Just because you put up a barb-wire fence and blight your own little corner of mother earth doen't mean you are owed "respect" for your "national sovreignty".

      Sometimes we just have to get up and say YOUR VIEW SUCKS. Your government sucks, your hate-filled little backward-ass religion sucks, and that ugly little clot of persistent superstitions you call a culture suck. You don't have our respect because you haven't earned it. Done. Now STFU and let the rest of us improve humanity.

      Oh! hehe, you thought I was talking about Iraq hahaha! Clooooossse......

    100. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither is painful. The temperatures of either are enough to instantly numb nerve cells, thus no pain, only numbness.

    101. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by dankjones · · Score: 1

      The only good reason to go to China would be to try to undermine the government.

      The only way to react to someone trying to prevent you or anyone else from free access to information is to circumvent, undermine and destroy them.

    102. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where the fuck did you get that number. 60 million is 50% of the population of Russia during the war. It's amazing how number and events get's inflated or exaggerated over time, by ignorant dip shits. i.e. Jesus, Mohammed, Buddha, Confusious.

      Long Live Chairman Mao

    103. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      I love the ability to work hard and get something for it. So I live in the US.

      You already have your plane ticket for Canada, don't you? Eh? Last time I checked, the US was more of a pure capitalist economy than Canada. And "work hard and get something for it" was a rather capitalist senitment.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    104. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by FinalCut · · Score: 1

      While the US is probably certainly partially to blame for the incindiary conditions in the middle east regarding Israel I think it is far more complex than just the US involvment.

      Imagine, if you will, the year 1948 - the year Isreal was once again a nation state. In the couple thousand years before that the Jewish nation suffered a diaspora that is truely tragic.

      However, in 1948 the table was turned. All of the current residents of Palestine were suddenly uprooted. Their nation was destroyed in an effort to "make up" to the Jews.

      How could the Palestinians not be upset? Their land was just ripped from them just as it had to the Jewish people 2,000 years earlier.

      In the end neither nation got a fair deal. The Jewish nation was placed back in their holy land but in the middle of millions of people who didn't want them there for understandable reasons.

      Did giving the land back to the Jews really make up for the eons of persecution? Hell no.

      Were talking about the most holy land, anywhere, to two vastly different religions. Judism is a closed religion (ie. its not easy to join) while Islam is an expansionist religion (like christianity). Unfortunately neither group really wants to share the Holy Lands. Instead, since pretty much every major relgion in the world is exclusive - you can't share.

      Sure, the US stirs the pot - but you can't blame it all on them. If anything, blame the thousands of years of persecution for Isreal being such a violent nation. Sometimes the best defense is a good offense. I can't say that it is a great idea - but if I were Israel I might feel the same way. I mean, you can only take so much shit.

      Of course, If I were Palestinian I would probably be out there fighting alongside the PLO and others to get my nations land back. The checkpoints, the curfews, the restricted rights, and the general third class citizenship that Palestinians have to face is abhorrent.

      In the end, regardless of your background, just be glad you don't live there. It is a muddy, nasty scenario that has no easy solution - and no easy goat to blame for it all.

    105. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If USA can attack another country "Just Like That"(tm), I would consider Chinese's censorship a godsend given it's only imposed within its own country. If you decided to move there, respect its laws; if you don't agree with its laws, go somewhere else. You always have a choice."

      Rubbish. I live in Australia, you know - little island other side of the planet. We get bullied into this "Free Trade Agreement" and all of a sudden - no choice mind - I have to 'respect' your IP laws.

      Regards,
      IDontRespectUSLaw

    106. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      killed some 115-120% percent of them. How is that possible, one would think after 100% there would be nobody left.

    107. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by fluppy88 · · Score: 1

      This poster is correct. The easiest way to get a long-term visa in China is to simply pay someone 1000yuan or so to get a long-term visa. It is a lot easier then getting your job to get one for you and less problematic than marrying a Chinese person (which won't always get you a long-term visa easily anyway.).

      Most people I know in China on a long term basis either go to HK every few months or have somehow illegally acquired a long term visa.

    108. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do you mean like America has made Iraq better? It's not for most Iraqi citizens.

      Maybe not most, but the 100,000 or so Iraqis killed by the conflict aren't suffering much anymore. This is what we call "freedom" and we're gonna spread it around a bit.

    109. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      Actually, we have a word for that. Most people know it. You should probably check out that link; you don't want to seem ignorant when someone uses it in a sentence.

      No extenuating circumstances ever, eh? Killing people is killing people? In the middle ages it was common practice to kill the young before a village was ransacked to keep them from being enslaved. It was believed that they would all go to heaven because they hadn't reached the age of accountability - when one is held accountable for ones own actions. So the village elders who did this out of love are as evil as Hitler?

      What about abortion?
      What about euthanasia?
      What about accidental civilian casualties during peacetime?
      Isn't there a difference between premeditated crimes and crimes of passion? Between accidents and deliberate acts?

      I think intent is a bigger deal than you make it to be, and that the issue is more complicated than you say.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    110. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by bakayoko · · Score: 1

      war sure is iffy.

      --
      A decibel - a RELATIONSHIP between two values of POWER http://arts.ucsc.edu/EMS/Music/tech_background/TE-
    111. Re: R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by randolph · · Score: 1

      "There is not a man beneath the canopy of heaven that does not know that slavery is wrong for him."--Frederick Douglass.

      I'm sure there's a taoist quote to the same point, but I don't know it. But do take care, Solo Han.

    112. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by peawee03 · · Score: 1

      From what I understand, it's been Jews vs Muslims in Palestine/Israel/Holy Land/Great Block of Artificial Cheese for the past few centuries. One of those nobody-knows-who-started-it things. Both ethnic groups in the region hate each other, and the reasons why are unknown, and long before America started meddling in the eastern hemisphere.

      --
      I wish I could write clever and witty sigs.
    113. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      solzhenitsyn has written a lot of bullshit. this would mean nearly half of the soviet population at that time.

      p.s. i was born in the ussr.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    114. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by peawee03 · · Score: 1

      You *do* realize that there has never been a "Palestine" as a nation-state either. That land was once part of the Ottoman Empire, which was then given in a mandate to the British after the Ottoman Empire was dismantled under the League of Nations post-WWI. The 1948 UN Partition of Palestine did however, set aside land for a Palestinian homeland. If you look at maps of the partition scheme and post 1948 war maps, you'd notice that Arab nations around Israel managed to swallow up large amounts of land set aside for the Palestianians. Not a single nation, wanted the Palestinian nation there. For example, Trans-Jordan wanted the entirety of Palestine to itself, which is also what I believe Egypt and Syria wanted. Israel, naturally, didn't want to be so squished between gun implacements.

      Here's a map of the UN plan and here's one post war of independence. Notice how the area known as the West Bank, which was gifted to the Palestinians, isn't Israel... nor Palestinian...

      Both are cultures not of hate, but cultures where children are born of fire. Political leaders on both sides tend to be war heros, who still remember being shot at by the other side.

      --
      I wish I could write clever and witty sigs.
    115. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by rammer · · Score: 1

      If american jews are non-violent then why is US supporting the theocratic Israel?

      That's right, it's because the american jewish community is bankrolling the US presidential candidates and other political figures.And for the record genocide must not be allowed to happen ever again anywhere anytime by anyone to anyone. This includes silent genocide. Subversion of a race of people by oppression and "inclusion" in the "greater good".

      Israel would have ceased to exist long time ago if it were not for the US involvement. US needs to step down from leading the peace negotiations and let some other non-involved nation handle it. And continue the peacetalks until an agreement is reached despite ANY bombings/killings on either side and then both sides need to enforce the agreement as best they can. There also needs to be a democratic Palestinian state and a permanent arbitration council between Israel and Palestenian state. Truth and Reconciliation commission like in South Africa would not be a bad idea either. This is not likely to happen though. US will keep holding peace talks and US and its citizens will send money and arms to Israel. Arabic nations and their citizens will do the same for the other side. Extremists will halt the peace process again and again with new bombings resulting in reflex "precision strikes".

      This is true of many current conflicts. There are too many vested inrests to keep the conflicts running for a long time. The idea of a international weapons tax of even 1% to finance UN's peace efforts is not likely to happen either, because of the vested US interests.

      These vested interest will not simply go away. My solution would be a grassroots effort by the people of the world to buy all weapons manufacturing companies of the world and make them stop affecting public policy for starters. E-mail me if you are interested in getting it started.
      E-mail: rammer+buyweapons (at) ipi.fi

    116. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Suhas · · Score: 1

      Cliff is the editor, not the poster.

      Jeeez.....

    117. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by formal_entity · · Score: 1

      The Chineese political leaders, legislators and judges where NOT elected, not one of them. They do not represent the people in any way, why should we respect THEIR will? The only reason we keep them in the UN is that it's be best we can do right now; however in the long-run we do not care about there particular persons, it's the will of the Chineese people that matter. Should they choose this system that they have today, then so be it; but the fact is that they did not choose anything.

      No law, document or paper can take way (or give) you the fundamental human rights. You just HAVE them, they are intrinsic.

      The form of democracy may be choosen, modified and improved but there is no choice between democracy and dictactorship.

      Human rights, democracy, freedom of speech, opinion, the right to a fair trial etc are universal rights.

    118. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by TeraCo · · Score: 1

      +1 insightful. I wish I had mod points :P

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    119. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      I think he actually meant being sent to prison...

    120. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by roine · · Score: 1

      If you're a citizen of a major country, probably nothing really bad will happen to you, but just getting deported will have dire effects on your future travel plans.

      That's some really bad advice. You are likely to be treated like everyone else. See for example the Australian kid who tried to smuggle dope into Singapore for which there is a mandatory death penalty. Despite all efforts by Australia, he is scheduled for execution.

      http://www.google.com/search?q=Nguyen%20Tuong%20Va n

      If you don't intend to live by the rules in the country of which you are a guest, don't go there.

    121. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Otter · · Score: 1
      My point was limited to the immediate question -- I do think it's extremely unlikely that a G7 citizen would be shot for possession and use of an SSH client.

      In general, though, you're absolutely right. (Although, in my experience, those SE Asian countries do make it crystal clear upon entry that anyone caught with drugs will be in a world of trouble, foreigners included.) In another country, you play by their rules, as it should be.

    122. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truth is not so black and white. A cousin by marriage is a Ukrainian. Under Stalin, the Ukrainian NKVD came to his family and murdered every last male member save 2 or three (it has been 20 years since my cousin/veteran/survivor told it to me). When Von Paulus's Wehrmacht came to his small town, my cousin, now a partisan fighting the Russians, went with all the men and women that remained of his family to the German commanders and begged to join the Wehrmacht. The commander agreed. Then began another oddysey of fighting, retreat, more fighting, all the way back to Germany and the fighting was still not over yet, as the occupation authorities were after them after that as they were after all German veterans.
      Over the time, my cousin saw many bodies of ordinary people killed by Stalin's various state security apparats. Many of those deaths attributed to the German forces were actually killed by the NKVD and the communists. I cannot say the Russians, because many Russians fought against Stalin and the Communist Party. When it was pointed out that the Soviets were murderers as in the slaughter of Polish officer corps and men in the Katyn Forest in Poland, the German news reports were ignored as 'Nazi propaganda'. After the war, occupation forces murdured 3 million Germans and German allied citizens and former soldiers. Germany in all its sectors for 3 years after the war was over was a happy hunting ground for every allied soldier with a gun and grudge. Most of the dead died in so called 'displaced person camps' which were really death camps. Germans from the Oder-Niese region of Pomerania and Silesia were herded into these camps for virtual extermination, unknown and unreported to the west. Had they survived, their existance would have been an embarrasment to the new Polish communist government who wanted that territory emptied out to make a place for settlers displaced from that part of Poland taken by White Russia (now known as Belarus). Then comes Elie Wiesel and his constant crying about his lost Jews. He must know in his heart that his Jews were not the only ones that lost out, and that the Germans were not the only ones that killed them. The history of the Ukraine and of Russia is covered with blood from pogroms against not only Jews but others whose existance was somehow inconvenient. My cousin is now a German citizen courtesy of his service and his marriage....mostly his service. He lives quietly in a small town in the Rheinland-Pfalz...or he did 20 years ago. He still told the story about how 5 Soviet GRU members came to him to kill him. Only armed with his fist and a knife, he got them all. Life was tough on the Eastern front and you got tough in order to survive.

    123. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      That's exactly my point. OP stated that China oppressing its own people isn't so bad, because they're not bothering anyone else (although try telling that to the Tibetans), while the US, he asserts, randomly attacks other countries for no reason at all, making it much worse.

      First of all, the Chinese government is oppressive on a much larger scale. Secondly, the US attacks, whatever one thinks of them, were hardly unexpected or random. It's not like Bush suddenly decided to invade some random country, making everyone in the world worry that they might be next. Afghanistan was harboring terrorists who'd just attacked the US, and was given plenty of opportunity to avoid being attacked. The UN approved the invasion, and it had wide international support.

      The war in Iraq is, of course, more controversial, but it was still an invasion of a country the US had been at war with a bit over a decade earlier, with issues that hadn't been resolved and continuing low-grade hostilities throughout the Clinton administration. I personally don't think the situation was handled in the right way, but the war was neither unexpected, random, or completely unilateral.

      The point of my analogy was that both Hitler and Stalin were evil; you can't point at what Hitler did and then say Stalin wasn't so bad, because he didn't start a world war and murder millions of civilians from other countries, and more than you can forgive the Chinese oppression by pointing at Bush attacking a couple of countries. It's a complete non sequitur.

      In fact, it reminds me of Americans who, when their government's policies are questioned, point to some other country that's worse. "You don't like the PATRIOT Act? Move to Iran!" It's like they think the only reason to improve your own country is if you think it's the worst place in the world. Even the best, most free countries can do with a bit of improvement.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    124. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Changa_MC · · Score: 1

      Israel has only existed since the 1960's, and has been steadily expanding ever since. On many maps, Palistine ceased to exist in 1997, and I think that is a fair assessment. The people of "Palistine" are born and live within Israel, under Israelie law. Citizenship in Israel depends only on race/religion, so that non-Jewish families that have lived there for hundreds of years will never be allowed to vote. THat explains the hatred, it's no mystery

      --
      Changa hates change.
    125. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Changa_MC · · Score: 1

      But that's his point. The numbers are off, when you round it to 6million, it becomes a mathematical impossibility, yet some countries will label you a nazi for claiming it was closer to 5million than 6.

      --
      Changa hates change.
    126. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Asterisk · · Score: 1

      Aha! "Solo Han"! He IS a Chinese cop!

    127. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by sloanster · · Score: 1

      If american jews are non-violent then why is US supporting the theocratic Israel?

      Because they want to live, and believe Israel should also be allowed to exist?

      Your calling Israel a theocracy reveals a lack of knowledge, as the modern Israeli is an agnostic, and the state of Israel is what is known as a democracy. Everybody gets a voice, every faction, the militant right, the peace activists, israeli arabs, orthodox religious, even the communists get a say, and the ones with the most votes get to lead.

      For a gentle heads-up on what a theocracy is, please refer to Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc.

    128. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by FinalCut · · Score: 1

      boy I hope I didn't give the impression that I thought either culture hateful. Stubborn sure, but hateful no.

      I think both groups have people have had to deal with an inordinate amount of crap and levels of unfairness that I can't fully imagine.

      Finally, while there may have never been a "nation-state" of Palestine all of those Palestinians who were displaced in 1948 did live there - just living their lives before they suddenly had new rulers.

      Nowadays, thanks in large part to the incessant violence of the region, the understandable mistrust of the Israeli government, and who knows what else the Palestinians are defianatly second class citizens.

      I find the whole situation both tragic and sad; and as I said before far too complex for me to imagine a solution for.

    129. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by tritesnikov · · Score: 1

      ...Imposing your values on another is just plain wrong...

      If you say that imposing values on another is wrong, isn't that imposing what you think is wrong on the parent poster? Just a thought.

      --
      "God is dead." - Nietzsche

      "Nietzsche is dead." - God
    130. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by rammer · · Score: 1

      Have you checked the political climate of Israel lately?
      Most of the parties are religious parties.And even tho Likud is not a religious party as such, it is heavily allied with religious parties. Religious parties hold majority of Knesset(Yes, I included Labour party and Likud in that calculation)It is true that Israel is a democracy but theocratic nevertheless.

      Of pure theocracies Iran is a good example.Saudi Arabia not so much. Israel even less so. But all are theocratic. I you want to continue this discussion, please e-mail me. Google for my e-mail address.

    131. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by Mikhail+Edoshin · · Score: 1

      You'd better not to rely on Solzhenitsyn on this point. The numbers that serious historians have been figuring out don't even come close to this huge one. According to Zemskov the whole number of imprisoned and executed for 'political' (counter-revolution) crimes during 33 years (1921-1953, most of which was Stalin's rule) was about 3,8 million: about 3 million imprisoned and about 800 thousand executed. These numbers also includes real enemies, such as post-revolution saboteurs, Nazi spies, war-time traitors, etc. Zemskov's study is based on about several hundred thousands 'low-level' GULAG archive documents and it's impossible to claim all of them are fake.

      60 and other 'millions' (some authors manage to get even 100 millions) approximations are based mainly on such ridiculous methods as to take population growth rate of some year (say, 1900) and to extrapolate it to a period of fifty years, then compare the calculated result with the real one and blame Stalin of killing all these 'missing' people.

      The topic is still hot in Russian political Internet forums and there is a great number of web-pages devoted to this question, so one able to read Russian can probably dig up himself what he believes is the truth. I did :)

  3. Let me get this straight by fataugie · · Score: 1
    You want your cake and to eat it too?

    Have a good time!

    --

    WTF? Over?

    1. Re:Let me get this straight by dcstimm · · Score: 1

      I thought you said

      "You want your Cat and to eat it too?"

      Considering its a china that would be on topic:-)

    2. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? Out.

    3. Re:Let me get this straight by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      You want to have your cake but not eat it? I hate to think what you do want to do with it...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:Let me get this straight by commrade · · Score: 1

      The Chinese don't eat cats. See, there is no country called "Asia". It is a region with many different cultures and customs. Not all Asians are the same.

    5. Re:Let me get this straight by Hellkitten · · Score: 1

      You want to have your cake but not eat it? I hate to think what you do want to do with it...

      Maybe this?

      --
      - We are the slashdot. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be moderated -
    6. Re:Let me get this straight by grainofsand · · Score: 1

      I have eaten my different types of cat since first being posted to China in 1996. I prefer dog, but cat is quite a tender flesh and is good eating.

      --
      A dream is good. A plan is better.
    7. Re:Let me get this straight by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Hey in parts of India, it's just plain wrong to eat cow. I have had plenty of Steak here.

  4. Missing obvious point? by bigtallmofo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This may be obvious to most people (I sure have missed obvious things in the past), but some background as to why you're thinking of moving to China might put your question into proper context.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Missing obvious point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "some background as to why you're thinking of moving to China might put your question into proper context."

      Agreed. It's not as if we are talking about a move to Canada, which most people could infer the reasons for doing so (whether you agree with them or not). Moving to China hardly conjures up images of escaping from opression.

    2. Re:Missing obvious point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's in the regime change business...

  5. Proxy? by taoxek · · Score: 2, Informative

    Maybe you can access a proxy and view through it?

    1. Re:Proxy? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe you can access a proxy and view through it?

      That's what I did when I was on vacation in Communist Vietnam.

      Problem is, I couldn't post anything on Slashdot because it disallows posting through proxies.

      You can still read everything that's posted though.

    2. Re:Proxy? by greechneb · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd find someone who would be willing to allow ssh access to a machine of their own here in the states. Tunnel everything through ssh. I mean EVERYTHING, down to the last bit. I've never been to China, nor do I plan to anytime in the near future, but from what I have read about their censorship, any precaution you can take is a good one. Encrypted file systems, encrypted transmissions, all good.

      Good luck if you do go, and perhaps you can post back to slashdot to let us know what it is really like behind the great firewall.

    3. Re:Proxy? by Erwos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are making the fundamental assumption that encryption is legal over there. I am not certain I would bet my freedom on that assumption, not in China. Even in the West, crypto regimes can range from non-existent to very strict (France used to be very strict, believe it or not).

      -Erwos

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
    4. Re:Proxy? by jnf · · Score: 1

      You assume the presumption of innocence. I am not refering to China in particular here, however if my effort was to censor my citizens, then the first thing I would grab people for is the use of encryption. A covert channel/flipping a bit here and there in a proxy-like server sending legitimate traffic would raise less eyebrows.

    5. Re:Proxy? by spudgun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      leave a linux box at home . setup ssh or pptp and tunel into it , and then use squid on that box ....

      easy ish ?

      --
      Type unto others as you would have them type unto you.
    6. Re:Proxy? by operagost · · Score: 1

      "Used to be?" I thought they still prohibited the use of any form of encryption in communications unless the keys are kept in escrow with the government.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:Proxy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It depends on who you are, what you are doing and where you are posting from.

      An American business man from Shanghai financial district using SSH? No problem.

      Chinese teacher in the middle of nowhere using SSH. Nope.

      Some foreign dude using SSH randomly around China. Grey line. Be careful.

    8. Re:Proxy? by nemesisj · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Encryption in China is illegal, but the general rule of thumb in China is that foreigners are not handled very roughly.

      That said, I've set up people who want to have decent access to news outlets and generally anonymize themselves on the TOR network, which is a great project from the folks at the EFF.

      TOR (http://tor.eff.org/) uses onion routing to bounce you around within their cloud of secure servers, which makes it very difficult to see who you are, where you're going, and where you came from. You can tunnel almost anything over it, and it's open source.

      I've found it to be very fast (even on China's slower internet connections), and those who use it love it.

    9. Re:Proxy? by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
      the general rule of thumb in China is that foreigners are not handled very roughly.

      This is a myth. A few years ago a Canadian lady was accused in China of smuggling drugs. Before her family or the Canadian Consulate even knew she had been charged, she had been executed.

      The Chinese Government dropped it there, but later, there was enough evidence found by the consulate to assume she may have been framed by the real smuggler.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    10. Re:Proxy? by meza · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apperently this took place in Vietnam in 2000, not in China. Terrible story anyways. The womans name was Nguyen Thi Hiep.

      http://www.google.com/search?&q=Nguyen+Thi+Hiep

  6. Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think I'd rather get caught running drugs in Mexico and end up in a Mexican prison than attempt what you're suggesting and get caught.

  7. I have said it before, and I will say it again by YankeeInExile · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I wish you luck, but do keep one thing in mind.

    Be very cautious when tormenting a power-structure that has few qualms with making you vanish in the dead of night.

    The Chinese government is not going to send you a polite subpoena and meet you in a clean courtroom some months down the road like the *AA where you will be given access to effective counsel and a more-or-less fair shake.

    Instead, if they catch you circumventing the Great Firewall of China they may descend upon you in the night and drag you off to a dank prison for reeducation.

    --
    How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    1. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by Hinkkanen · · Score: 1

      In China you are guilty until proven innocent. Good luck

    2. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by SoupGuru · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I tend to agree that you might need think a little harder about what the consequences of such actions would be. It's not like we're talking about a move to Denver here... we're talking about a move to an opressive country that has human rights issues and tight government control.

      I recommend extreme caution.

      --
      What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
    3. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Does the poster currently live in Guantanamo Bay? No? Didn't think so. Take your agenda (which I agree with, by the way) and save it for a relevant discussion. This isn't it.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    4. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In China you are guilty until proven innocent"

      China has that too?

    5. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Be very cautious when tormenting a power-structure that has few qualms with making you vanish in the dead of night.
      You read too many Tom Clancy novels. It's perfectly true that making trouble for the Chinese government is an invitation to an unpleasant interview with the local constabulary, a long prison stay, or even a bullet in the back of the head. But they don't act like bad guys in spy thriller. They're very open and aboveboard about these things. If they shoot you, they'll even send your family a bill for the bullet!
    6. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by dr_dank · · Score: 0

      they may descend upon you in the night and drag you off to a dank prison for reeducation.

      Hey, leave me out of this!

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    7. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by demachina · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They are very unlikely to do this to a foreign citizen unless what you are doing is or can be construed to be espionage or subversion. They are welcoming foreigners with open arms because they want your capital, skills, knowledge etc. so they are less likely to come down on you than one of their own citizens.

      If what you were doing was offensive enough to them and you got caught you would almost certainly be deported which is true of just about any country where you are on a visa. If you are openly violating their law there is always a chance you would go to jail but thats true of any country. The U.S. embassy probably would try to spring you unless you were getting what you deserved.

      At this point I think its a subject of debate on whether the China or the U.S. is actually worse in this regard. Hundreds if not thousands of foreigners have been locked up in the U.S. in the aftermath of 9/11 without due process, without lawyers, without trials, without access to their families, and often under varying degrees of stress, sleep deprivation for example, if not rising to the level of torture. About the only thing many of them were guilty of are various visa infractions, which should at most have resulted in deportation, not indefinite detention without due process.

      China probably does it on a larger scale but the U.S. and Americans no longer have the slightest morale high ground on which to challenge oppression and lawlessness in China. Certainly censorship isn't as bad in the U.S. but as far as unlawful arrests go the U.S. is at the same level as China. You can thank the Bush administration for lowering the U.S. to the same level has authoritarian states around the globe in this respect.

      --
      @de_machina
    8. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by LeiGong · · Score: 3, Informative
      Who bloody the hell modded this troll post up to Insightful? I normally don't chime in on posts like this, but the above is just plain ignorant. I lived in China til I was 8 and I've been back 4 times since then. I will tell you from first hand experience that the Chinese government is not nearly as omnipotent as some of you may believe it is. It does not seek out the individual that's looking up porn or the guy sitting next to you in a webcafe using a proxy to read the BBC. Hell, the majority of teenagers in China learn about sex from the web. *gasp* The government is going to swoop down and arrest them any day now... I'm not defending its censorship guidelines (I think they're pointless) but trash posts like the parent should not be given any credibility!

      I will assume that the poster is an American citizen working in China, since he/she did not mention being there before. There is such a thing as extradition. Yes, that means they can't just randomly arrest US citizens for surfing the BBC and proceed with a closed-door trial w/ US Embassy intervention. Chances are, the poster will not try to start a revolution or organize a mass protest and will not be at any risk. And even if he/she did, the government would find it simply easier to just revoke the Visa and deport him/her than unlawfully detain the person. Unauthorized jailing of US citizens is equal to an international incident and it would just be easier to deport the offender. It sounds like the parent saw one too many viewings of The Red Corner. I'll say this again, the Chinese government is WAYYY too inefficent and lazy to pursue ex-pats looking at western news sources. They've got bigger fish to fish.

      If you're not trying to topple the Chinese government from the inside, you've got nothing to worry about.

    9. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Informative
      Oh, give me a $#%&king break.

      I know that sounds "insightful" from where you are, but I live in China, and nobody gets "dragged off in the dead of night". It's just like everywhere else. If you get into legal trouble, you just bribe your way out of it. If you go to China intending on overthrowing the government, you can expect to end up in their version of Leavenworth, just like any foreigner who goes to another country to make trouble.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    10. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by alpha_foobar · · Score: 1

      The Chinese government is not going to send you a polite subpoena and meet you in a clean courtroom some months down the road like the *AA where you will be given access to effective counsel and a more-or-less fair shake. Who is?

    11. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool! As an Iranian, I'd feel right at home!

    12. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Unless you can come up with the "I'm innocent" envelope of much cash.

      Of course, the arresting officer may have the "Shield of Corruption", and then they throw you in the "Dungeon of Doom".

      But since you would end up in the "Dungeon of Doom" anyway, you might use the enveolpe, assuming an above-16 charisma.

      Best advice: If you go to China, DO NOT break the laws. And I don't have to be a laywer or play onr on TV (That would be CCTV) to know that.

      A quick call to the state department's asia bureau would be my next move in your shoes.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    13. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by topham · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you are in a foreign country you are subject to their laws; period.

      Any exceptions to this are them being generous and choosing to make an exception for political reasons.

      It really bothers me when I see people make claims that are untrue. "Unauthorized jailing of US Citizens". Generally there is no such thing, in some countries without a significant legal system it is possible. China does have a legal system. (Whether you like it, or not.)

      Never enter a foreign country with the intent to violate it's laws. You are likely to find out the hardway there are repercussions and that your country of origin has no inherent right to intercede.

      You might want to look into the incidences where U.S. law enforcement personnel have been arrested and thrown in jail for kidnapping offenses on Canadian soil. I can assure you the U.S. government wasn't thrilled with the outcome.

    14. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by swb · · Score: 1

      They are very unlikely to do this to a foreign citizen unless what you are doing is or can be construed to be espionage or subversion.

      Am I expected to rely on my extensive rights within the independent Chinese judicial system as the protection against the Interior Ministry arbitrarily construing my behavior as espionage/subversion related?

      Hundreds if not thousands of foreigners have been locked up in the U.S. in the aftermath of 9/11 without due process, without lawyers, without trials, without access to their families, and often under varying degrees of stress, sleep deprivation for example, if not rising to the level of torture. About the only thing many of them were guilty of are various visa infractions, which should at most have resulted in deportation, not indefinite detention without due process.

      Maybe we should have just driven tanks over them like they did in Tiananmen Square. Sure, peaceful protest in the name of democracy is a lot more dangerous and kills more people than terrorist plots to fly hijacked planes into buildings, but just to keep on equal footing with the Chinese perhaps a mass killing was called for.

      Asshat.

    15. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      So, one of my closest friends has been in China for the last 6 months and has regularly been sending me reports about the way things are for a foreigner living over there. It is true that the Chinese government doesn't take well to dissidents, and will gladly dole out extreme punishment to them. However foreigners, at least those who are not of Chinese descent, are not generally held to the same standards as Chinese citizens. Even the Chinese aren't held to the standards their government claims most of the time.

      Are there swift executions with no appeal? Yes, but they usually only happen to somebody who committed murder. According to my friend, the cops will often watch violent bar brawls where people beat each other to a pulp, even stabbing each other with knives and broken beer bottles in the extremities, all without intervening or arresting anybody. Of course, if somebody actually kills someone else, they can expect to be dragged off by the cops and summarily executed within a few days.

      However, unless you seriously fuck with the government or senior party members (not recommended) or openly disrespect their laws and culture (i.e. bring drugs into their country), or kill someone, you aren't going to be dragged off to a labor camp. The Chinese government has no interest in pissing off the American government, assuming you are an American, by detaining their citizens willy nilly. Seriously, firewall circumvention by a foreigner isn't going to get you thrown into jail - that's excessively paranoid overreaction. Now, if you start handing out fliers or encouraging Chinese citizens to disobey the rules of their social order, that's another story.

    16. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by bitswapper · · Score: 1

      "they may descend upon you in the night and drag you off to a dank prison for reeducation"

      Is that like re-neducation?

      "just sit back an let the hooks do their job...

    17. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but I live in China, and nobody gets "dragged off in the dead of night".

      Would you open the door, please? We have problem to get in.

      Your Government.

      By the way, how did you get access to this capitalistic decadent blog site? It should be censored by now...

    18. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by northcat · · Score: 1

      They are very unlikely to do this to a foreign citizen unless what you are doing is or can be construed to be espionage or subversion. They are welcoming foreigners with open arms because they want your capital, skills, knowledge etc. so they are less likely to come down on you than one of their own citizens.

      That's probably the stupidest thing I've ever heard.

    19. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by operagost · · Score: 1
      Don't play dumb. Entering a nation with a fake or expired VISA is clearly wrong and unneccessary unless you're planning on committing more serious offenses -- period. Being imprisioned for exercising one's human rights to free speech and religion is not on the same level.
      U.S. and Americans no longer have the slightest morale high ground on which to challenge oppression and lawlessness in China
      I have imprisoned no one. I have every right to criticize them. My own actions are not tied to my government's. Regardless, your statement is meaningless because the greatest moral teacher once said "he who is without sin, cast the first stone." Since no one is blameless, I guess we'll have to let China do as they please.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    20. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by demachina · · Score: 1

      "than terrorist plots to fly hijacked planes into buildings"

      Hate to break it to you, dumbass, but its unlikely any of the people the U.S. arrested on visa violations after 9/11 had anything to do with 9/11 or hijacking planes, or crashing them into buildings. They were mostly guilty of being Muslim and being in the U.S. after 9/11 and at worst violating their visas.

      Even if they are guilty of something, we used to have this little thing we called due process and the rule of law which said if someone does something wrong you prove it in a court of law, instead of letting the government be judge, jury and hangman.

      There is a total of one person the U.S. has arrested in the U.S., Zacharias Moussaoui, that may or may not have been involved in 9/11, and ironicly he is actually getting a trail, though the DOJ has botched that trial at every turn.

      Your post is a golden example of whats gone wrong with America since 9/11. You are so enraged over it you fail to recognize a couple of basic things:

      - If, because of 9/11 the U.S. shreds it Constitution, tramples everyone's civil liberties and turns in to an authoritarian state, to steal a Fox/Republican party jingo, "The Terrorists Have Won".

      - Guerilla attacks like 9/11 and all those before it are designed precisely to cause a kneejerk reaction in the target country. The kneejerk reactions usually causes more damage than the original attack in the end.

      - First they cause the target government to become more oppressive as it engages in a futile attempt to stop further attacks, in the process it makes its people unhappy with that government and less supportive of it.

      - Second the kneejerk reaction causes massive economic damage as the target government squanders money trying, usually futilely, to prevent an attack, can you say Department of Homeland Security, TSA, war in Iraq etc. It also puts a drag on the whole economy just from all the new security overhead and the paranoia.

      Some of America's kneejerk reactions to 9/11:

      o Launching a fabricated war in Iraq
      o Torturing people at various secret and not so secret site around the world
      o Arbitrary arrests of people without due process
      o Strong arming and trampling the sovereignty of nations around the world

      All of these have served to erase any good will the U.S. had around the world right after 9/11 and has turned America into a country that is despised and feared in many if not most corners of the world, among former friends and enemies alike.

      All in all Bin Laden and Al Qaida must be overjoyed with the damage the Bush administration has done to itself and America's reputation. Their plan has at every step worked better than they probably could have imagined thanks to the fact that America's leadership is acutely short of basic wisdom, much like yourself.

      America should have taken the moral high road at every turn since 9/11 instead of taking every degrading low road possible. If it had most of the world would be helping it in the war on Al Qaida instead of just shuddering everytime the U.S. makes another strategic blunder.

      --
      @de_machina
    21. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by operagost · · Score: 1
      According to my friend, the cops will often watch violent bar brawls where people beat each other to a pulp, even stabbing each other with knives and broken beer bottles in the extremities, all without intervening or arresting anybody.
      Wow, that's the kind of law non-enforcement I LIKE! I'm going to China!
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    22. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because the 3 year detainment of 151 folks is morally comparable to the oppression of a billion or so for decades. Good point.

    23. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      I will assume that the poster is an American citizen working in China, since he/she did not mention being there before. There is such a thing as extradition. Yes, that means they can't just randomly arrest US citizens for surfing the BBC and proceed with a closed-door trial w/ US Embassy intervention.

      I don't think you have much of an idea what extradition means. It works like this: you commit a crime in country A, and escape to country B. Because countries A and B have an extradition treaty, you can be arrested in B for your crime in A, and returned to A for trial.

      There are many underlying assumptions here. Countries A and B basically trust that each other's legal systems are just. Country B may also refuse to extradite on various exceptions, such as the possibility of capital punishment in A (fair trial or otherwise), or hints of political persecution.

      What is does not mean is that if you're a citizen of country A living in country B, that you have any right to be tried in A for a crime committed in B.

      Unauthorized jailing of US citizens is equal to an international incident and it would just be easier to deport the offender.

      No, a sovereign state does not require permission to jail a foreign national under its jurisdiction. That's exactly what the word "sovereign" means. How else would the FBI arrest, say, a Chinese spy in Washington if you need permission from the Chinese government?

    24. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by deacon · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's just like everywhere else. If you get into legal trouble, you just bribe your way out of it.

      Oh, lucky you. Over here, that only works for teddy kennedy.

      Seriously, though, bribery only works in the 3ed world and black africa. Trying a bribe in north africa will get your hand cut off. It might work in china if you have enough money for them to be intersted.

      Sound like you are one of the rich and privliged classes who can buy your way out of trouble.

      I guess you don't care about the poor people who don't have the money to buy their way out of trouble.

    25. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by demachina · · Score: 1

      "That's probably the stupidest thing I've ever heard."

      Maybe you should try to make a coherent arguement to support your point, otherwise your post looks kind of stupid in its own right.

      I assure you China is less likely to make a U.S. citizen disappear in the middle of the night than one of its own. That is true of any country arresting any other countries citizen. The reason is obvious, the person's embassy will get involved and it will quickly turn in to a diplomatic incident. If you arrest one of your own citizens, its unlikely anyone but his family and friends are going to care, unless the person has international notariety.

      As far as bypassing censorship goes that is a case where there would be an obvious double standard between foreigners and Chinese. In bypassing a firewall the foreigner isn't going to learn anything he probably doesn't already know and isn't likely to be more corrupted than he already is. The foreigner is only going to get behind on current events thanks to censorship. Censorship as China practices it is intended to be life long to help insure all of its citizen's, who never live outside the country, are NEVER exposed to foreign concepts.

      --
      @de_machina
    26. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by demachina · · Score: 1

      "Entering a nation with a fake or expired VISA is clearly wrong and unneccessary unless you're planning on committing more serious offenses"

      OK you are either trolling or that is such an insane statement it barely warrants rebuttal. There are untold millions of people living in the U.S. without visa's and in violation of immigration laws. They are called illegal aliens and most of them are from Mexico and Central America. If EVERYONE of them is here to commit serious offenses this COUNTRY IS DOOMED. The main difference here is those millions and millions of ticking time bombs are Catholic and not Muslim so they are OK.

      People cheat on visa's all the time. They come to the U.S. and they don't want to go back to their country so they stay after they expire. Its kind of hard for the U.S. to be all righteous about it since the U.S. makes almost zero effort to deport most illegals from this hemisphere. In fact, many places give them drivers licenses, education and heal care benefits. They are in fact welcomed in the U.S. with open arms because they are cheap exploitable labor. Half of America agricultural workers are illegal, and probably the same goes for hotel workers, gardeners, maids, kitchen workers etc.

      Some of the infractions Muslims were arrested for were on student visa's where the person wasn't taking quite the prescribed number of hours of classes for one reason or another, trivial crap like that.

      --
      @de_machina
    27. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by demachina · · Score: 1

      "I have imprisoned no one. I have every right to criticize them".

      Since you live in a representative democracy if your government does something wrong, especially as egregiously wrong as unlawful wars, arrests without due process and various grades of torture, and you and your fellow citizens do nothing to stop it, and continue to fund it through your taxes, you are just as much to blame as the people that commit the offenses in your name.

      Your one out is if you voted against the government that does wrong in your name at the first every opportunity. If you voted to keep Bush in the White House for a second term, in spite of the fact that they have been writing briefs endorsing torture and unlawful arrests, and fighting in the courts to acquire the power to make unlawful arrest and engage in torture, and have detained people for years without charge, often under the harshest of conditions, and launched wars based on fabrication, YOU ARE AS MUCH TO BLAME AS THEY ARE.

      --
      @de_machina
    28. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      intending on overthrowing the government, you can expect to end up in their version of Leavenworth, just like any foreigner who goes to another country to make trouble

      I think you mean Guantanamo (with the attendant torture and other human rights abuses, just like China).

    29. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by BoldAndBusted · · Score: 1

      How do you _know_ that people aren't "dragged off in the dead of night"? In a country of over 1 billion people, how do you know that? In a country that spans 5 time zones, how do you know that? In a country that routinely censors its press, how do *you* know that?

      And, besides, why do they have to "drag them off in the dead of night" when there is no law stopping them from doing it at noon on a sunny Sunday?

    30. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by handslikesnakes · · Score: 1

      How do _you_ know that they are?

    31. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by swb · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you, dumbass, but its unlikely any of the people the U.S. arrested on visa violations after 9/11 had anything to do with 9/11 or hijacking planes, or crashing them into buildings. They were mostly guilty of being Muslim and being in the U.S. after 9/11 and at worst violating their visas.

      Sorry, but I'll take denying illegal immigrants associated with suspect behavior a measure of "their" (they're not citizens) civil rights versus just assuming that all the Muslims in the US are shiny happy people who love America, American culture and American values and aren't contributing support in person, materially or otherwise to Islamofascists bent on killing people.

      I'll grant you that Iraq was/is a clusterfuck, but you dramatically overstate the "success" Bin Laden's been experiencing.

      Bin Laden personally: Kicked out of Afghanistan, lost his host government and is living life as a hunted man. Not a cheap proposition for an Arab in Pashtun regions.

      Al Quaeda generally: Lost their host country. Experiencing small succcesses against the US military, but all are pyhrric victories given that we've been stacking dead terrorists there like cordwood. One unstated virtue of the Iraqi occupation is that it's far better for them to take out their aggression with only slight success against the US military than it is against the US civilian population. Further, Al Quaeda cells across Europe are under extreme scrutiny and Europe is currently re-evaluating the entire premise of multiculturism given the Islamic killings in Holland and elsewhere.

      Depsite America's apparent loss of diplomatic prestige, post-9/11 we have the largest military presence we've ever had in the middle east, not to mention new military bases in Afghanistan and several central Asian republics.

    32. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like someone who has never had any legal issues in the US. I assure you it works exactly the same here, only the bribery is clandestine.

    33. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China probably does it on a larger scale but the


      Probably? Probably!?


      U.S. and Americans no longer have the slightest morale high ground on which to challenge oppression and lawlessness in China. Certainly censorship isn't as bad in the U.S. but as far as unlawful arrests go the U.S. is at the same level as China..


      Yes, we did imprison a number of suspected terrorists, largely people staying on expired student visas. The roundups here, however, largely have had access to due process. You are confusing them with the Guantanimo bay crowd.

      In addition to the roundups in this country, we absconded with a large number of Taliban/AlQaeda members in Afghanistan. They are being held without due process, and are not subject to the domestic court system, because they are not domestic in the first place.

      Imagine if the us decided that captured enemy soldiers could sue for due process when fighting abroad. It would be insane; you could never prove in a battle that every 'john doe arab' was in fact shooting you with an AK from a hole in Tikrit or wherever. Military battles DO NOT use civilian rules of conduct and military personnel DO NOT use civilian legal codes. Read the ******* conventions. You cannot put an enemy soldier on trial for fighting, which if you were to put him into the domestic legal system, is exactly what you would be doing.

      PS You can be a communist and run for office in the us, if you are a non-communist, what happens if you run for office in China, HRM??????

    34. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      "Entering a nation with a fake or expired VISA is clearly wrong and unneccessary"

      True...so why the fuck would a terrorist do such a dumb, stupid thing? It's relatively easy to get visa's. If you have the backing of an organisation with even just a modicum of cash, it's real easy to meet the requirements for obtaining a visa. Not doing so as a terrorist would frankly get you nominated for a Darwin.
      Someone with a bad visa (or without one) is likely to be an economic drain on a country, or likely to go out and mug someone; that's the reason he/she didn't get a visa: not on account of terrorism, but because he was either poor or didn't have enough (formal) education.

      It's just common sense: a terrorist who is any threat at all will have all his papers in order. So go the way of madness, and do what the UK just tried to do: make it legal to lock up everyone who has their shit in order, !because he might be a terrorist!.

      As for your comment about that Jesus guy: I don't think he meant it as an excuse to never critisice anything, ever. Or to get you out of your responsibiliies, for that matter. And please remember two other facts: Budha was no slough at moralising either, and the movement Jesus left in his wake has been the most bloody, corrupting, ignorance-promoting, overpopulating-and-let-the-world-be-damned cult the world has seen for the past couple of thousand years.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    35. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's not about whether or not they should be tried in the civilian courts. It's about the fact that they have been imprisoned, without even the courtesies accorded to prisoners of war by the Geneva Convention.

      Either they should be tried by military law -- in which case, the Geneva Convention should apply -- or they should be tried by civil law. You can't have your cake and eat it too. Especially when in so trying, there are significant allegations of abuse and torture. What makes the allegations all the more worrying is that there has been so little independant oversight of what is going on in there.

    36. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by demachina · · Score: 1

      "Bin Laden personally: Kicked out of Afghanistan, lost his host government and is living life as a hunted man."

      Excepting in the Muslim world he is towering hero and more so everyday for making the U.S. look like chumps. George Bush as you recall spouted off about getting him "dead or alive" years ago and has since pretty much gone mum on the subject because he fixated on Iraq and Saddam instead of Al Qaida. The U.S. hasn't even come close to catching him, and as nearly as anyone can tell the U.S. isn't even trying very hard because its impaled itself on Iraq for no obvious reason. For a hunted man he sure manages to put out propaganda tapes at his whim, and has rallied a big chunk of the Muslim world to his cause.

      "Al Quaeda generally: Lost their host country."

      They've lost their "host country" in Afghanistan before. Bin Laden did a long stint in Sudan. Another really obvious parallel is when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan and engaged in a decade long occupation and lesson in futility. They got along just fine then in the mountains of Afghanistan and the tribal areas of Pakistan just as the probably are now.

      You may forget but Al Qaida was formed in the Pakistan tribal areas with the aid of the CIA and Ronald Reagan. They devastated a militarily superior Soviet army and that failed war as much as anything sped the fall of the Soviet Union. These are patient people and they now how to fight and win long insurgencies and wars, and dont kid themselves like the U.S. does when it wins a brief battles and that is all the U.S. has won so far in Afghanistan and Iraq.

      Pakistan's incursions in to the tribal areas have been half assed or half hearted at best. The U.S. and the Afghan government doesn't control even a majority of Afghanistan. Its dominance of the country is confined to Kabul, a few urban areas and a few U.S. military bases.

      Besides that I'd say there is a pretty good chance Al Qaida expected to lose Afghanistan after 9/11 and almost certainly planned for the contingency. Many analysts suggest Al Qaida is more dangerous now that it was then. Then it was concentrated and easier to track. Now its a multiheaded hydra thats been scattered around the globe and there is no one place to look for it any more. If there is one place its the same place its always been the mountains of Afghanistan and the tribal areas of Pakistan. As much as you think things have changed they probably haven't. Though according to the CIA's own studies Iraq is probably their new training ground for insurgency because there is a big fat American bullseye and all the ingredients for a successful insurgency, including a Sunni population that increasingly hates Americans.

      --
      @de_machina
    37. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and nobody gets "dragged off in the dead of night"


      Yes, and:

      -- The Nazi German Gestapo didn't drag people off in the dead of night and torture them to death or send them off on cattle car trains to concentration camps
      -- The Soviet KGB didn't drag people off in the dead of night, torture them, and bury them in mass graves
      -- The East German Stasi didn't do any of that either

      Because lawless police state regimes never do such things because there are so many checks on their authority.
    38. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by Atomic+Frog · · Score: 1

      I'll vouch for that. I'm a US Citizen.
      When I drove across the border from Canada to USA, it turns out my wife did not have proper paperwork.

      (This is really screwy. Before marrying me, she's freely allowed to enter USA for almost as long as she wants, whenever she wants. Afterwards, no such luck).

      So what do you think should happen? Any reasonable person would get turned around, refused entry and that's was that. We even told them "Look, if we don't have the proper paperwork, we'll come back when we do."

      Instead, they detained us for over 2 hours and searched my car and messed everything up. They were _very_ rude and exceedingly hostile.
      Yes, that is how America treats its own citizens and citizens of a friendly nation. I can imagine if I got lippy with them (even though no laws are broken) they would be even more trouble. They even threatened to throw me in an isolated room.
      (FYI, I'm not of middle-eastern descent!)

      When I went to Washington DC _before_ 9/11, every public building had metal detectors and bag searches. When I queued up for the Whitehouse, I was told that not to even put my hands on the fence outside, else the Secret Service would come. Yes, they assume their own citizens will do something nasty.

      When I went to the social security office (not to collect money, to get my SSN), it was 1 person entry at a time, no cameras, metal detectors, bag searches. The one granny ahead of me had a cane (she was Caucasion, not visible minority), they made her give up her cane, take off her shoes and belts and had her hobble through.

      Look at all the flack the Dixie Chicks got into for criticizing Bush. I dunno how they're doing now, but I'll bet if they wanted to, they could have totally ruined their careers. You call that freedom of speech?

      That is America. Not as free as you think.

    39. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Does this mean you are not going to send me the detailed plans of their secret weapon's facility as we agreed upon? If not, Ill transfer the money back out of the swiss account

    40. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Well, that's not the point. The point is that the poster wasn't even trying to make any sort of comparasin like that. Not even close. And yet here comes this fanatic to allegedly "fix" this misconception that the poster never showed any evidence of even having in the first place.

      There's some folks out there who annoy the crap out of me, by being so fanatacal about topic Foo that they make the assuption that if you don't mention Foo in every single point you make, that must mean you are ignorant of Foo and need to be shown the error of your ways. The post here felt like one of those.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    41. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by demachina · · Score: 1

      "The roundups here, however, largely have had access to due process. You are confusing them with the Guantanimo bay crowd."

      You are thoroughly mistaken. It is well known there were county jails in New Jersey and New York in particular, turned in to indefinite detention facilities for hundreds if not thousands of Muslims detained after 9/11. It wasn't even possible to find out the names of those being held, let alone get them access to lawyers, family visits or anything resembling due process. There was a long running legal battle going over it between the government and groups like the ACLU.

      Here is one of many links you can find in Google on them. Not sure how many are still being held, the media does a poor job of covering things like hundreds of people being locked up indefinitely without charge, especially if they are just Muslim.

      Is it any surprise stuff like this can happen in the U.S. You just have to read the replies I've gotten in this thread. They follow two tacks:

      A. Denial it is even happening indicating ignorance of what your governments been doing to civil liberties since 9/11 though its really obvious and there have been long running court cases over it proving it has and is happening.

      B. They are getting what they deserve, with the implications all Muslim's are hijackers and terrorists, or if the Government arrests them they must be guilty and its not necessary for them to get a day in court.

      "Imagine if the us decided that captured enemy soldiers could sue for due process"

      The detainees in New Jersey and New York were NOT enemy soldiers caught on a battlefield carrying arms. No one really knew who they were or what they were being held for. If you go down this road you are giving the U.S. government, and in particular its President, authorization to arrest anyone, any time, anywhere in the world, and doing anything he chooses to to them. It is not the kind of power that should be giving to any one person unless you are a big fan of dictators. In fact the U.S., since 9/11 HAS been arresting people all over the world with nothing more than the government's worthless word as to their guilt.

      For the last while I've been on the verge of leaving America because I am so ashamed of what its become, but the more I think about the more I think the people in the American government that are doing all this wrongness and the people like those that posted here that are cheering them on are the ones that should leave. Beside which America has extended its tentacles around the entire globe so it not like you can escape the insanity of its current government. Maybe its time to fight instead of flee.

      All in all you people don't seem to have the first clue what our Constitution stands for, or how important the rule of law is. You are the ones that ought to be ashamed because you are helping destroy the worlds first great experiment in "Freedom and Democracy". At this point might I suggest you either learn or remember what rule of law, the Declaration of Independence, the American revolution, and the American Constitution really stand for or GET THE HELL OUT. You sound more like you should be in Saddam's Iraq than in the world's oldest democracy. First and foremost our fore fathers were fighting tyranny, for you all to be embracing tyranny the way you are sullies everything America used to stand for. In doing a side by side between our founding fathers and our pathetic politicians and people of today, I've concluded American's today are inferior in every regard.

      "PS You can be a communist and run for office in the us, if you are a non-communist, what happens if you run for office in China, HRM??????"

      Hmmm. I guess you are forgeting what America was like the last time the Republicans controlled both Congress and the White House. It was during the 1950's and a certain Republican Congressmen named McCarthy persecuted anyone who had the slightest hint of being a Communi

      --
      @de_machina
    42. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by SenatorOrrinHatch · · Score: 0

      parent is a 'tard, but what do you expect from a repugnican. Here in the US and W. Europe you bribe lawyers with $300 an hour to get you out of a jam. In other countries you cut out the middleman and just give the police a $20.

      --
      The Christian in me says it's wrong, but the corrections officer in me says, 'I love to make a grown man piss himself.'
    43. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "China probably does it on a larger scale but the U.S. and Americans no longer have the slightest morale high ground on which to challenge oppression and lawlessness in China."

      I very much disagree with this. The richer and Eastern cities like Beijing and Shanghai are very different to other regions, and typically sport more fundamental freedoms. In Tibet, for example, most foriegners I've talked to have ben watched while they were there. Parts of Inner Mongolia, Turkestan and Manchiria are similar. The authorities are also very corrupt. America is in the middle of a scare, but China's been worse than this for a long while.

      I realise I'll be labelled troll/stupid/ignorant/whatever for saying this but I don't care; this is too important to ignore, especially as China's economic and political power is growing rapidly. I know people who were forced to flee Tibet and move into Dharamsala after China moved in. My friend's father fled and eventually reached my country, New Zealand, but he's never seen his brother since. I know there'll be a lot of people flaming me for saying this, but I am absolutely convinced that the PLA did move into Tibet in 1949. There are too many refugess and there is too much recognition of Tibet as an independant state prior to 1949.

      America might be going through a terror scare right now, but whether it's purposely provoked by polititions or not, China has been in a worse state for almost a century now.

    44. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by AutoTheme · · Score: 1

      What? Any attempt I would make to "bribe my way out" of anything would end up in a much longer prison sentence. Leavenworth? Only criminals in the U.S. military go to Leavenworth. All of the other U.S. prisons offer steak and shrimp night, exercise gyms for the prisoners to bulk up, TV rooms and conjugal visits.

    45. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bzzt, wrong. Google search next time, you won't look so dumb in public.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    46. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by demachina · · Score: 1

      "The authorities are also very corrupt. America is in the middle of a scare, but China's been worse than this for a long while."

      Well obviously we have a disconnect here. China must not be bad any more because the United States, bastion of "Freedom and Democracy" and Capitalism is currently engaged in a wholesale transfer of its jobs, intellectual property, wealth, and government debt to China. The great patriots, and defenders of Freedom, who currently run the United States couldn't possibly be turning America's fate over to an evil Socialist dictatorship. So which is it:

      - China must be an OK place now or Clinton, Bush and Co. wouldn't have sold America down the river to it
      - China is still an evil Socialist dictatorship and Clinton, Bush and Co. are knowingly selling America down the river to them which implies they are evil too
      - American's are so blinded by the cheap labor and the money to be made that they are selling America's future down the river to make a quick buck now, and selling their children and grandchildren in to poverty. That couldn't possibly be it, considering how much time the Republicans spent during the campaign saying if the Democrats were elected all the children and grandchildren would die. If you look at the course the Republican's are taking both fiscally and in foreign affairs, I'm inclined to say they are probably the biggest danger to future generations America has seen.
      - American's captains naively think that if they turn China in to a wealthy bastion of Capitalism that the Chinese will one day just tell their repressive socialist government that they can retire. I'm sure thats what they say to themselves when they are in denial, I just rather doubt the people running China are going to loosen their grip no matter how rich they get. China is apparently going to be a first in world history, a socialist dictatorship that is both not under economic boycott from the Western world and filthy rich.

      --
      @de_machina
    47. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by demachina · · Score: 1

      I should also add I wasn't exactly saying America is as bad as China on the oppression scale. I was saying their is an element of hypocrisy and denial for American's to start ranting about China arresting people in the middle of the night and making them disappear without a trial. Since 9/11 the U.S. has done this to thousands and thousands of people all around the world. You see the Chinese mostly just arrest people within their extended borders. The U.S. is arresting people without charges or trial all over the globe. One of the British citizens just released from Gitmo was arrested in Zambia of all places, he lost three years of his life living in a cage in Cuba and was never charged with anything by the U.S. or Britain. I'm inclined to say either you prove guilt and punish accordingly or you dont lock people in cages for years without due process.

      So at least as far as arbitrary arrests go the U.S. can't lecture the Chinese any more.

      As far as the invasion of Tibet well it was and is sad. But the U.S. did in fact engage in large scale genocide and ethnic cleansing of its own against the native American. They still live largely in apartheid states called Indian reservations which are usually quite desolate waste land, land the white man didn't want. In a cruel twist of irony the native American has discovered a hole in their relationship with the white man that enables the casino and is picking the white man clean. Ah, justice. More recently America's occupation of the Phillipines in the early 20th century was as noteworthy as China in Tibet for its brutality. The U.S. has also installed and supported some especially brutal puppet dictators in places like Chile, Argentina, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Haiti, Iran, etc.

      All in all on the scale of brutality and oppression the U.S. is right up their contrary to popular opinion.

      --
      @de_machina
    48. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by nursedave · · Score: 1
      So because you live there, you know what happens (or doesn't happen) to the other billion or so people in that country?

      Why is it that dissidents DO exist, and are dragged off (I'm not sure what time of day, however), and executed or kept in prison for the best years of their lives, for doing nothing but dissention?

      --

      The Democratic Party: We've been pussies since 1968!

    49. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask David Sneddon's family whether it's true that nobody gets disappeared in China. Sneddon is a U.S. citizen who took a trip to China and never came back. He was not there to "make trouble"; he was a college student who went there to practice his Chinese language skills over the summer.

    50. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Fox News told me!!

    51. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by swb · · Score: 1

      Muslim unity is grossly oversold. Bin Laden is able to maintain safe haven in Pashtun tribal areas with money, not with his reputation as a Muslim hero. Remember in 2000 when Iran massed troops on their Afghan border (and probably performed some cross-border raids/recon that never got in the Western press); what does THAT tell you about "muslim unity"?

      Muslim unity supposes a functional hierarchy; leaders and followers. Except Islam doesn't have a formal structure like Catholicism or Protestant denominations, furthermore "leadership" gets confused with statecraft; when I take marching orders from an Ayatollah in, say, Iran, am I taking the best religious advice for my sect, or am I actually furthering the goals of Iran? Of the Persians?

      With the competing political demands of ethnicity, religion and nation-states all mixed together in Islamic countries, it's easy to see how Muslim unity gets really tough to rely on.

      These people are family members, clan members, tribal members, ethnic group members, and religious members in that order and in that order of loyalty.

      The Pashtun had a good thing going before Bin Laden in the tribal areas. The last thing they want is the Pakistani army snooping around, and ESPECIALLY not a bunch of US special forces guys who have the scary habit of seeing in the dark and being able to squawk into a radio and rain down hell from the sky. It's a choice between Bin Laden or having AC-130s tear up your villages; for now the Bin Laden's money has equalized the equation. On day it might not.

    52. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by stinerman · · Score: 1

      I choose option three.

      Where money can be made, morals are lacking.

    53. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by demachina · · Score: 1

      Don't recall ever using the term "Muslim unity". About the closest thing I said was Bin Laden is a towering hero in much of the Muslim world. That doesn't have anything to do with whether they are united. Nice rant otherwise but I'm not sure what it has to do with anything I said. When I referred to Al Qaida as scattered and a multi headed hydra now that is actually kind of the opposite of "unity". Its hundreds of little movements scattered around the globe, tapping in to local politics, tribes and situations. I think "united" might actually be easier for the U.S. to cope with, there would be a nice org chart to roll up.

      Another place that absence of "unity" is going to be more, rather than less dangerous to American interests is the deep schism between Shia and Sunni. With the Shia rising to power in Iraq there is going to be all kinds of interest new pressures on American allies like Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Jordan and Kuwait, and a potential alliance between the Shia in Iran and Iraq against U.S. interests.

      As for that last paragraph I think you've been reading a few to many Tom Clancy novels or playing video games of the same ilk. The U.S. and Pakistan have for whatever reason been completely impotent in the tribal areas of Pakistan and all the tribes there know it. I think the U.S. wouldn't and couldn't touch the place. If the U.S. were to have "AC-130s tear up your villages" it Pakistan it would be a political and diplomatic disaster and I imagine Musharaf would be dead or thrown out on his ear shortly thereafter.

      Some things haven't really changed. If you are skilled insurgents, not wearing uniforms, not citing out in the open in tanks, and are adept at hiding in mountains, jungles, urban areas and generally underground, conventional military power is impotent, your grandiose visions of AC-130's aside. This was true in Vietnam and has been true multiple times over decades in Afghanistan and is true in Iraq.

      --
      @de_machina
    54. Re:I have said it before, and I will say it again by AutoTheme · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, I bow to you o master of the googleness... Evidenced by the page in your link, no one has any idea that there is anything other than "Fort Levenworth". That's why someone has to point it out on a web page. Like the page that points out "When ever Alcatraz is mentioned, people always assume the prison. However we have many birds, some named after the island. That's what we are known for for God's sake... Oh wait, those are albatrose. Hmmm... K, nevermind

  8. ok by MasTRE · · Score: 2, Funny

    > I'm considering a move to China next year.

    Sorry, I stopped reading after that.. Good luck, you'll need it!

    --
    Must-not-watch TV!
  9. Nothing wrong here . . . by SupremeTaco · · Score: 5, Funny

    No sir you are wrong. There is NO censorship here in China, none at all! Yes siree, everything is free and open. As we say here in Chi

    --
    You have a constitutionally protected right to be wrong, and I the right to ignore you.
    1. Re:Nothing wrong here . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...sorry my Kung Pao Chicken just arrived. As I was saying. There is NO censorship here in China, none at all. As we say here in China me love you long time.

    2. Re:Nothing wrong here . . . by Geraden · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, at this point, the poster's door was knocked upon. He opened it & was given a new domicile, a bunch of money & a car for furthering the cause of Mother China.

    3. Re:Nothing wrong here . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funniest follow-up post I've read in quite awhile.
      Bravo.

    4. Re:Nothing wrong here . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless of course, your first and only child you are allowed to have is female, and then you just feel bitter of your horrible luck.

    5. Re:Nothing wrong here . . . by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      You know, there are going to be (are already?) an awful lot of lonely guys due to the cultural valuation of male children over female. That is, assuming the stories I've heard of abortions/infanticide are as widespread as some would have you believe.

      --
      ± 29 dB
  10. If you're a foreigner... by keesh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...they don't care. Nearly all of this censorship is only aimed at chinese citizens, and then only those that happen to be a convenient PR target. Unless you start actively trying to overthrow the government or anything daft like that, they're not interested.

    1. Re:If you're a foreigner... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is the parent funny?

    2. Re:If you're a foreigner... by einhverfr · · Score: 4, Informative

      If I were to do this... Which I don;t recomemnd but it is an interesting thought experiment... I would start by asking what the issue is for the Chinese...

      Namely they don't want dangerous ideas to spread. So low-profile sites may escape censorship.

      If it were me, I would set up an SSH server on a public host (maybe hosted by someone like hub dot org). I would set it to listen on port 80. I would then also set up Squid and allow anyone from localhost to proxy through it (Squid on port 8080). Then you can port forward port 8080 on localhost to 8080 on the proxy server and proxy to anywhere else. Depending on how the GFWC works, you might be able to get around it this way. Otherwise, depending on if it recognizes that it is NOT http, you might still be blocked.

      If you keep it a secret from others, it may be low enough to escape their radar. But if you get caught...

      Honestly? I have travelled to many other countries, and I generally recommend trying to live under the customs of the countries. You learn more that way. If you are an American, you can always move back here when you need a change.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    3. Re:If you're a foreigner... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny because it seems the gp actually believes what s/he's saying.

    4. Re:If you're a foreigner... by nologin · · Score: 4, Informative
      Unfortunately, the government's definition of an attempt to overthrow them can be much different than yours, so don't expect your values to mean anything to them.

      I have had the fortune of travelling to China back in 1998, and here is a bit of advice if you plan to make a trip of any significant length.

      1. If you plan on visiting or staying for some period of time, try to avoid bringing any computers or electronic devices with you. They have a strict policy at the border to inspect and confiscate devices if they consider any materials within them to be "detrimental" to the ideologies of the government. If you absolutely need one while you are there, consider buying one in China (the prices are relatively cheap). It is easier to get one out of the country than to bring one in.

      2. While the "Great Firewall of China" might be a nuisance to you, it will be very difficult to avoid. SSH tunnelling will likely be your friend in this case.

      3. Be courteous and cooperate with officials. The larger cities have dedicated police forces, but once you are in the more rural areas, these locations are policed by the army. And they use nice shiny AK-47s as sidearms.

    5. Re:If you're a foreigner... by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Also, if you're going to circumvent censorship with fancy tools, you first have to find some censorship to circumvent. During my two month-long stays in Beijing, I never once had any problems accessing any of the sites I regularly visit, including slashdot, CNN, Google News, etc. I know that it varies from place to place, but it's not as bad as a lot of people think.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    6. Re:If you're a foreigner... by Cheeko · · Score: 3, Informative
      There was a presentation on the Great Firewall at the HOPE conference last summer. I didn't catch all of it, as it was just as I arrived, but as I recall, all the filtering of content goes on at the router and DNS levels. All traffic through the country is filtered, but only some is acted upon. However all content is affected on a performance level.

      There are automated processes in place for blocking some content, and there are automated processes that evaluate material once it is accessed in a certain pattern. There is also a manual evaluation in which material is reviewed.

      There was also something about logging of IPs and caching, so review can be done later for information that can't be determined up front. All of this combines for a list of IPs, a cache of content, and a number of filtering algorithms that fairly effectively block material. However stuff does get through, but only sparsely. If one IP starts hitting a site over and over, or many people start hitting it, it draws attention.

      You can download the talk at this site. Scroll down to the one entitled "How the Great Firewall works"

    7. Re:If you're a foreigner... by Cygnus78 · · Score: 1

      1. If you plan on visiting or staying for some period of time, try to avoid bringing any computers or electronic devices with you.

      I had lot's of electronical equipment with me, no probs (this was only some days ago). MP3-player, mobile phone, gps and laptop.

      2. While the "Great Firewall of China" might be a nuisance to you, it will be very difficult to avoid.

      No, in the hotels it works totally fine.

    8. Re:If you're a foreigner... by HeghmoH · · Score: 4, Informative

      Time in China seems to be a lot like time on the internet. Unfortunately, this means that some of your advice is as pertinent to travelling to China today as talk of Netscape Navigator 4 and 40-bit encryption is to using the internet today. Apparently lot has changed in the past seven years.

      There is no special policy whatsoever for electronic devices, and they don't even inspect them at customs. Odds are that half the people on your flight will have notebook computers, digital cameras, PDAs, and of course they will all have cell phones, most of them with cameras and web browsers.

      Certain pieces of computer equipment are cheaper in China (mainly parts like RAM or hard drives) but portable computers are generally more expensive than in the US.

      The "Great Firewall of China" is very much not in evidence in the large cities. Overall, it tends to block specific Chinese dissident web sites, and not obvious stuff like CNN or Voice of America. I was not affected by it at all and you probably won't be either.

      Being courteous and cooperating with officials is always a good idea no matter where you go, of course.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    9. Re:If you're a foreigner... by rekrutacja · · Score: 1

      Being courteous and cooperating with officials is always a good idea no matter where you go, of course.

      I'm a 30 years old guy from Poland, and i do remember - i was a child in that time, but i do - December 1981, when polish military junta delegalised Solidarity, inprisoned thousands of people and, basically, took away from us most of freedoms. My fahter, journalist, was fired and couldn't find any job because of strictly political reasons. I do remember, that much of the help for my family came from abroad: people from Germany and France, people we didn't know, and never met, were sending us food, hygienics, clothes and books prohibited in Poland. My faher was working for independent, illegal publishing house, and much of the money, equipment and supply came from abroad. Obviously those foreign individuals helping us were not cooperating with officials in no way. Hell, they were breaking polish law, and were facing more or less dangerous prosecutons. So please, shut up, go back to your room and think about it again.

      --
      This Is Not a Sig
    10. Re:If you're a foreigner... by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      And how does this have anything to do with the subject at hand? Were these people from Germany and France coming to Poland? (Your use of the word "send" would seem to indicate that they weren't.)

      Even if they were in Poland, your story doesn't invalidate my point. Cooperating with officials is always a good idea. Not doing so is a risk. It may be a good risk, it may be calculated, it may be for the greater good, but if your first priority is not getting hauled off to jail then that's what you should do. I have the utmost respect for the people you're talking about, but it doesn't change my point one bit.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    11. Re:If you're a foreigner... by nzhavok · · Score: 1

      You may want to do this over SSL since then only the http connect can be seen. So the traffic and more importantly the shape of the traffic can't be determined, e.g. can't tell the difference between a proxy and a normal https session. This is the standard method I've seen people use to get around a restrictive corporate firewall, to use MSN/ICQ/IRC or various other programs. Not that I'm advocating breaking corp rules, just pointing out how it's done.

      --

      He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
  11. No help from US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Just so you know, the US won't fight to get you out of prison like other countries do for their own nationals. Have fun!

  12. -Blocked Site- by wbechard · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Unfortunately, you will likely get few responses from anyone in China, as Slashdot is a news site, and news sites are forbidden.

    1. Re:-Blocked Site- by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Sources please?

      All news sites are forbidden? I suspect you are full of shit.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  13. Have fun by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


    So basically your question is stating "I'm going to China and expect to be able to break their laws as I was fortunate enough to be born in a more free society."

    Don't whine to the foreign media when you're jailed as a subversive influence.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Have fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course he's no different from all those US people who want to know how to break DeCSS or download .mp3s from the internet.

    2. Re:Have fun by grub · · Score: 1


      I don't know about that, but he certainly is naive. I expect we'll see him on the news weighing 40 kg and behind bars in a Chinese re-education camp screaming "You can't do this, I'm an American!"

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    3. Re:Have fun by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Why not whine if they take away his freedom, especially as forcefully as by jailing him? Are you satisfied with the 2B Chinese people living in repression, and the threat of China to the rest of the world? If this guy is brave enough to go there and live as free as he can, an example to others, why are you dumping on him? Do you think freedom is just another cultural style?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:Have fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      That's not being brave, that's being retarded. And the US government won't do anything to China with the trade deficit being as it is. He'll be forgotten about in a jail. Some hero.

    5. Re:Have fun by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's often little to distinguish between bravery and stupidity. Both require acting despite fear, and usually appear exactly the same - until the brave actor accomplishes something. As for heroics, that's another story entirely, related more to hype than action - except in the most meaningful sense, where any act on belief in the face of opposition is heroic, though perhaps even anonymous.

      The US government's collusion with China at every step, and even dovetailing evolution, merely heightens the degree of courage in moving to China as a free person (even if only in one's mind). But it doesn't conflict with the chances that he'll succeed, even if only in a tiny, local way that inspires a few Chinese people. Never underestimate the power of a few people to change the world - they're the only ones who ever have (paraphrasing Margaret Mead). Most true heroes in our cruel world sit forgotten in a jail. That doesn't justify your freedom-hating criticisms; it underscores your own retarded attitude towards freedom, and those people who keep it alive despite severe opposition.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    6. Re:Have fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You tell 'im, Sparky!

    7. Re:Have fun by ADRA · · Score: 1

      Um, this poster's comments are one reason Americans get dumped on by the world at large. Instead of looking at the Chinese culture from their perspectives, you're looking at them from your corn fed middle-class lifestyle. Not everyone has the same ethics, polictical systems, languages, manner, respect for 'freedom' as you do. I'm sure there are millions if not over a billion quite happy little people living in China enjoying life on their own terms.

      They've had a smoking hot economy and I'm sure quality of living is increasing with it. I would be the first to recommend a more free China, but as long as regular citizens have the right to leave the country and practice they're beliefs elsewhere, you can't complain over their chosen lifestyle.

      Why aren't you complaining over the overtly regemented Singapore government, or the dozens of other governments that don't allow similar rights to its citizens? Even in America you've had citizens thrown in jail indefinitly. I wouldn't be sitting on that high horse if I was you.

      --
      Bye!
    8. Re:Have fun by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I live on the high horse of freedom. I've demanded, and got, more freedom from even the life I was lucky to be born with. I don't take it for granted, and I want everyone to be more free, for their own benefit and the increased safety of my own. So who are you to bitch about my support for more freedom for Chinese people?

      I have not put out some unmaintainable requirement for "balance" in criticizing America's march away from freedom - you have. Though I fight it enough, even in Slashdot posts. I am not making a list of priorities in where freedom is needed more. Your idea that somehow I should address other repressed places before addressing China might be enough to convince *you* to cop out, and not support freedom whenever you hear of it - even to say that somehow "regular citizens" of China are repressed as "their chosen lifestyle". But I'm not going to stop responding to someone's call for help in staying free (and thereby spreading freedom) in a post, just because there are other pressing demands for it.

      So if you would keep your fear of freedom to yourself, the rest of us can all do what we can to support freedom, even when it's just a little cheerleading. I sit on my high horse because *I* am free, because I don't take my American birthright for granted, because I am willing to do and say what it takes to defend freedom. You are a snivelling whiner twisting cultural relativism into a defense of the Chinese repression of billions of people. Too bad we have to preserve *your* freedom to say such prattle along with the freedom of people who actually value it.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    9. Re:Have fun by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Threat of China to the rest of the world? Much as all is wrong with the Chinese regime, the real danger to the world at the moment is the good old US of A. How many military actions has China been involved in in the past 50 years? How many has the US been involved in? How many countries has China invaded? How about the US? How many countries has the US threatened in the past 5 years? Mod me as a troll or flamebait if you must, but at least think about what I have said.

    10. Re:Have fun by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have posted quite often on the threat the US now poses to the rest of the world. It's my duty as an American to acknowledge that, and do what I can to stop it (not much, it turns out, but I keep doing it anyway). But that doesn't mean I have to ignore China's threat, especially in a thread about freedom in China. It also doesn't mean that I have to ignore the role that the US' mere existence continues to pose to China's threat, so long as we're not as repressive as China (not by far, though our momentum is heading there).

      The world is not so simple as "US good / China bad" or the reverse. It wasn't even that simple for the 50 year Cold War, when that was the convenient paradigm. Now we've got multiple layers of conflict and cooperation among free and repressive groups: governments, corporations, religions, affiliations and otherwise. So we have to leave behind the oversimplified "either/or" mentality, and just stand up for what we believe in. We have to keep *that* simple, like "freedom good", or we won't be able to say/do anything without getting paralyzed by subtleties and competing priorities.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    11. Re:Have fun by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Moderation 0
      50% Redundant
      50% Insightful

      How is my post in any way "Redundant", except perhaps that the answers to all my different questions are the same? TrollMod, you're just trying to keep me down.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    12. Re:Have fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live on the high horse of freedom. I've demanded, and got, more freedom from even the life I was lucky to be born with
      Unless you were born outside of North America or Western Europe in the past 30 years, I respectfully say you're full of shit.

      My fellow Americans take their freedom for granted, you're one of them.

    13. Re:Have fun by bbc · · Score: 1

      "Of course he's no different from all those US people who want to know how to break DeCSS or download .mp3s from the internet."

      Assuming he is from the USA, yes, it is different. It's the difference between the citizens of a country working to change their own set of rules, and spitting on somebody else's hospitality.

    14. Re:Have fun by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

      As a "military action," are we including the slaughter of 65 million of your own citizens?

      - Alaska Jack

    15. Re:Have fun by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Fuck you, Anonymous freedomhating Coward. I've been around this world, and my American life started me off with a lot of freedom, relative to our fellow humans. And I've shaken even more out of our country than it offered by default. So stick your obnoxious contradictions up your ass.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    16. Re:Have fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You come to my house, and you piss on my rug cuz you don't like my house rules, you bet I'll kick yo ass. And who the hell you think you are going around whining my family is 'oppressed'. Mind your own god damn 'oppressed' family. In fact, I won't be kicking your ass - my 'oppressed' family will do that with gusto.

      Threat to the rest of the world? This coming from a US dude? How is your 'freedom' dogma different from al Queda Islam?! Stop drinking the cool-aid and open your eyes.

    17. Re:Have fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you gonna do? Wage a freedom jihad against the world?! 'Fuck you' is the best you've got when you get called? 'Been around this world'... where exactly have you been?

    18. Re:Have fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we have to leave behind the oversimplified "either/or" mentality, and just stand up for what we believe in. We have to keep *that* simple, like "freedom good", or we won't be able to say/do anything without getting paralyzed by subtleties and competing priorities.

      Like al Queda did and knocked our buildings and buncha people... They certainly didn't have no problem with subtleties like a few muslims getting wiped out along the way. Few more of youse and our species' days are numbered.

    19. Re:Have fun by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Anonymous slaver Coward, when I go to your house to actually bring freedom, I won't be pissing your rug, I'll be stealing your daughter. Who can see through the bullshit of al Qaeda, Bush and your Chinese mafia tyrants - all liars. Your own ass will be swinging from the tree of mafia collaborators, courtesy of the freed people finally out of the yoke of your slavery and lies. You might not feel that oppressed now, having somehow risen through the Communist system to your privileged English-speaking, Internet-surfing place in the sun. But when you're working off your debt, you'll wish for kool-aid in the prison that's as close as ex-slavers get to freedom.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    20. Re:Have fun by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      No, the rest of the comment is better, but "fuck you" is adequate to this trash. I'm not running down my personal achievements to an Anonymous baiting Coward in a Slashdot post - I've been on every coast except those 2 exclusively Southern. But if you want more, I'll meet you for a little in person "fuck you". Where y'at, Coward?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    21. Re:Have fun by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Another Anonymous Coward quivering at the notion of standing up for their belief. People like me also believe "killing bad". Is that too much to fit into your chicken brain, Anonymous terrorized Coward?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    22. Re:Have fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you tell me where you at, and maybe I will save you the bus fare. Curious, though. What are these 2 'exclusively Southern' coasts? Australia, Chile, South Africa, or what? Or your 'every coast' means East and West? US is one big country, but it ain't the world.

    23. Re:Have fun by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      The two "exclusively Southern coasts" on Earth are Antarctica and Australia, smart guy. I've been across this country several times, too. I'm in NYC - come and get it, chump. Though we have direct flights to practically every loudmouth hicktown on the planet.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    24. Re:Have fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      China is currently *mainly* interested in pulling down the economic might of western democracies in order to impose their glorious rule upon the rest of the world. Maybe you consider that to be a peaceful development, but consider what their national(istic) values consist of before jumping of joy.

      But more importantly, you seem to believe that China hasn't been waging wars and invasions in the past 50 years? Simply unbelievable.

      China has invaded and continues to occupy territories in every possible direction (Tibet, East Turkestan, "Inner" Mongolia, India, Korea), besides assisting the "domestic genocides" and dictatorships in South-East Asia (Khmer Rouge, Burmese military junta) and North Korea to name just a few.

      The US has done, and is doing, many evil things around the world, but to their "credit" they aren't militarily *annexing* foreign nations.

      You arrogantly claim to "at least think what you say". What the fuck are the oppressed Tibetans and Uighurs supposed to think about your thoughtful respect for the "non-aggressive" Chinese regime?

      Care to explain?

    25. Re:Have fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... other islands in the southern hemisphere don't count as 'exclusively Southern', eh, smarter guy? Is this a dictionary term or did you just pull it outa yo ass? Actually, I am curious - maybe it is generally accepted geographic term. And I guess you must have been to 'every coast' in this country, too. I'm coming, 'chump' - will call you for direction when I cross GW if my truck don't break down before.

  14. What you haven't considered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    is that perhaps slashdot is already blocked in China?

    and if it's not, you're going to be making people living in china talk about restricted sites... which will probably be monitored by the chinese government since we're not over ssl, and great, you just made the chinese govt more suspicious of those people.

    1. Re:What you haven't considered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't see how he would be making people in china respond to his question

    2. Re:What you haven't considered by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      It's a good thing too, imagine the slashdottings!

      Yes, i'm being sarcastic.. Jeez.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

  15. "Get Around" the censorship? by DoorFrame · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do you really want to consider "getting around" the censorship. It's not like they're playing a game over there. They're not setting up challenges for the techno-elite to figure out how to access Slashdot from being the Great Firewall of China. It's not like "Gosh, I can use a proxy! I can tunnel... they'll find this very clever and I'll be able to do whatever I want."

    You'll be breaking the law.

    In China.

    Are you a big fan of breaking the law in general? Are you a big fan of spending days, weeks, or years in a Chinese political prison? Do you like having your legs unbroken?

    I would highly recommend against going to China with a plan of "Getting around" the censhorship. It's not just a technological hurdle to overcome, it's the law. And as a general policy, you don't want to be breaking the law in foreign countries. Their jails aren't as nice as ours.

    1. Re:"Get Around" the censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do you like having your legs unbroken?

      Yes actually, if they were broken I would very much like to unbreak them.

    2. Re:"Get Around" the censorship? by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      And as a general policy, you don't want to be breaking the law in foreign countries. Their jails aren't as nice as ours.

      ...Except in Missouri.

    3. Re:"Get Around" the censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Their jails aren't as nice as ours.

      You haven't visited Guantanamo, obviously...

    4. Re:"Get Around" the censorship? by bwy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Plus, if all he is worried about is censorship, he really needs a reality check. Hint- the same basic regime that brought you Tian'anmen Square didn't go anywhere. Our media is suprisingly good at making our own country look bad and not showing the opression in other parts of the world.

      Just check with anybody you meet who is an ex-national of Iraq, Iran, China, Cuba, Soviet era-Russia, etc. There aren't too many happy stories to be heard. The other day an Iranian friend who fought in the Iran-Iraq war for Iran was telling me how kids were used to clear minefields. He wasn't lying- check Wikipedia or some place.

      If he hates America and want to leave, I'd suggest Canada, Australia, the UK... all English speaking countries that are good safe places to live. If you speak some other language than English, there are of course a lot more choices.

    5. Re:"Get Around" the censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's probably one of those criminals who breaks DeCSS or has a Patent-violating unlicensed MP3 player.

    6. Re:"Get Around" the censorship? by JeffWhitledge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Their jails aren't as nice as ours.

      You haven't visited Guantanamo, obviously...

      You haven't visited China, obviously...

      --
      These comments do express the opinions of my employers, and, personally, I think they're complete rubbish.
    7. Re:"Get Around" the censorship? by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      Do you like having your legs unbroken?

      Actually, if my legs were broken, I would very much appreciate that.

    8. Re:"Get Around" the censorship? by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      I would highly recommend against going to China with a plan of "Getting around" the censhorship.

      Especially having admitted the desire to do it...

    9. Re:"Get Around" the censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our media is suprisingly good at making our own country look bad and not showing the opression in other parts of the world.

      you've got to be kidding... Fox, CNN, MSNBC, New York Times, Washington Times, whatever, they're all US nationalist outlets. Sure many of them support the Democratic Party, hence the "liberal media" thing, but the US is almost always portrayed as the good guys.

    10. Re:"Get Around" the censorship? by BCGlorfindel · · Score: 1


      >You haven't visited Guantanamo, obviously...

      You haven't visited China, obviously...


      You haven't visited Abu Ghraib, obviously...

    11. Re:"Get Around" the censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never been to China or seen a Chinese prison (except in movies) but I bet even without video games Missouri's prisons are nicer.

    12. Re:"Get Around" the censorship? by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      Why do you think post-Soviet Russia's quality of life is any better than it was before? Do you have any idea what you're talking about? Seems to me, you're just mentioning various enemies of the US government, without any real knowledge. The idea that the US media is somehow pro-Iraq, Iran, China, Cuba, etc., and you have an inside scoop to straighten us out, is absurd.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    13. Re:"Get Around" the censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our media is suprisingly good at making our own country look bad and not showing the opression in other parts of the world.

      Our media is suprisingly good at ... not showing ... other parts of the world.

      (Probably closer to the truth.)

    14. Re:"Get Around" the censorship? by chochos · · Score: 1
      You haven't visited my basement, obviously...

      Did I just say that out loud?

    15. Re:"Get Around" the censorship? by bwy · · Score: 1

      Seems to me, you're just mentioning various enemies of the US government, without any real knowledge.

      Well, it isn't my fault that many of the US govt's enemies are those that do things like...

      ...Kill 3000 students speaking out for democracy
      ...Treat women as bad or worse as slaves were treated over a hundred years ago
      ...Pass laws saying you can only have one child
      ...Make conditions so bad that citizens try to float away to America on home made rafts
      ...Use children to clear mine fields
      The list goes on and on.

      and you have an inside scoop to straighten us out, is absurd.

      Now you're putting words in my mouth. But, since you mentioned it, I will tell you I do think. I think that change is rarely effective when it comes from the outside. The Iraqis, for example, don't want to liberated from outside, no more than we would have wanted Europe trying to end slavery here in the 1800's. Additionally, I don't think the Iraqis really valued personal freedoms anyway- it isn't really a component of their ideology. Therefore we're forcing something on them from the outside that they don't even want for themselves anyway. Backfire!

      On the other hand, after Lincoln was elected we had a civil war. Change came from within. I think around 600K people died, but it also ended slavery and paved the way for a much less deadly civil rights movement in the next century. And it worked. It is quite rare that someone drives a car bomb into a crowd here because they're pissed about the way the civil war ended up.

      At any rate, my post was in response to the guy who posted the question about moving to China. I am under the strong opinion that anyone raised in American culture will have a lot of adjustments if they move to China or the other places I mentioned. This guy was being a little ignorant if he thinks the answer is to hack the national firewall of China. By the same token, I think most women in America would find most of the Middle East to be a very poor place to live. Try telling a woman you see on any street of America that she'd no longer be entitled to an education and she will need to cover her entire body when in public, and the local religion allows for men to beat their wives.

      This is why, I suggested that if you are upset with America, perhaps Canada, Australia, the UK, etc. would be a good choice. But, to each his own. Let this guy move to China and see what happens when he tries to act like he is allowed to act here. Let him try hacking the national firewall or laying in the street to protest something like people do in California. If China is so great, nothing will happen, right?

    16. Re:"Get Around" the censorship? by klang · · Score: 1

      where are all those nice jails?

      I mean, yes, a prison is not nice if you don't understand the language, but hey, that's just part of the whole prison experience.

      What do you want, a brochure?

      Check the law and don't expect "the right to remain silent" anywhere else but the US of A.

    17. Re:"Get Around" the censorship? by cthulhubob · · Score: 1

      > Try telling a woman you see on any street of America that she'd no longer be entitled to an education and... the local religion allows for men to beat their wives.

      Around here we call that a "trailer park."

      --

      In post-9/11 America, the CIA interrogates YOU!
    18. Re:"Get Around" the censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if they (China) pair you up with a boyfriend like here...

  16. You have problems with the government? by daniil · · Score: 5, Funny
    and while I have just as many problems as y'all do with the government

    What kind of problems? Did you sell military secrets to the Chinese?

    --
    Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    1. Re:You have problems with the government? by nine-times · · Score: 3, Interesting
      GP: and while I have just as many problems as y'all do with the government

      P: What kind of problems? Did you sell military secrets to the Chinese?

      Wait... so, he says he has just as many problems with the government as you do, and you ask him if he's committed espionage and treason?

      What did you do?!

    2. Re:You have problems with the government? by daniil · · Score: 1

      You don't want to know. If i told you, they'd have to kill you :p

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    3. Re:You have problems with the government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A more fair analogy would be "have you ever downloaded a MP3", or "have you ever downloaded DeCSS", or "did you ever install work's copy of Photoshop on your home computer"?

    4. Re:You have problems with the government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need, the govt already feeds 'em with whatever they need.

    5. Re:You have problems with the government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is legal over here, FYI.

    6. Re:You have problems with the government? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      What kind of problems? Did you sell military secrets to the Chinese?

      Wait - he's trying to fund a reelection campaign?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  17. In case of no more replies.. by naitro · · Score: 1

    [..] what are the websites, search engines, news sites, and other sites that are classed as potentially 'dangerous' material?

    Well, slashdot.org for one.

  18. Communism by Vandil+X · · Score: 1

    As an American, I'm not familiar with living under Communist rule, but I'm pretty sure that the penalties of trying to circumvent Chinese government-controlled limitations are probably more severe than those of the United States.

    Same black-suited guys emerging from black vans. Where they take you and what they do to you/treat you is a whole, 'nother thing.

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
    1. Re:Communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese government is not Communist. There has never been a Communist government anywhere.

      The ruling party is a Commuinist Party - but that in theory means that Communism is the goal they are aiming for. True Communism wouldn't _have_ a ruling party as such.

    2. Re:Communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " As an American, I'm not familiar with living under Communist rule"

      But I bet you do "know" they are against everything you stand for, because they are freedom hating people, right?

      And I do not believe they are more harsh; Try circumventing US security nowadays and you'll be locked up indefinately, without legal assistance (or maybe you'll even dissappear mysteriously).

    3. Re:Communism by jav1231 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah because we all know Republicans are bigots, right? Let's check history. Post-Civil War blacks in this country immediately voted in Republican state governments after the war. Eventually, the Democrat Party regained power by preventing blacks from voting. How many Republican KKK members have you heard of? I'd dare say little to none. Yet we still have former KKK members of Congress. What party? hmmm. Blacks have been appointed to higher positions under Republican administrations than under Democrats, including Clinton.
      You, Sir, are an idiot. With any luck you can't breed.

    4. Re:Communism by MutantHamster · · Score: 1
      Same black-suited guys emerging from black vans. Where they take you and what they do to you/treat you is a whole, 'nother thing.

      Yeah, I can see it now...

      CHINESE SURVEILLANCE AGENT: Captain! We have a red alert! Somebody has been accessing Slashdot to read about something called "World of Warcraft".
      CAPTAIN: He must be a spy! Send out a torture squad to ruff him up a little bit. (Reading the monitor) What the Hell is a muhmorpeg?
      --
      My Greatest Heist - Muisc partly inspired by the unbeatable Qwantz
    5. Re:Communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What about those imprisoned after 911 with no trial? Or the Japaneese/Americans during WWII. Your statement should start, "As a White Christian American....".

      What the hell does Christ have to do with anything here?

    6. Re:Communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GP did not say anything about Republicans, so you're full of shit.. but...

      Post-Civil War blacks in this country immediately voted in Republican state governments after the war. Eventually, the Democrat Party regained power by preventing blacks from voting. How many Republican KKK members have you heard of? I'd dare say little to none. Yet we still have former KKK members of Congress. What party? hmmm. Blacks have been appointed to higher positions under Republican administrations than under Democrats, including Clinton.

      OK, fair game - the Democrats were the party of slavery, there's no contesting that. But you seem to be leaving out something important. The Republicans won back the South by becoming the segragationist party, and this was a hell of a lot more recently.

      Next time you want to "check history", try not to conveniently forget things.

    7. Re:Communism by bombadillo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah because we all know Republicans are bigots, right?

      I don't recall mentioning Democats, Republicans or any other politcal party in my original post. I was pointing out that our country has also had it's problems with civil liberties in the past. Perhaps you have a guilty concious. Some of that White Christian guilt?

      How many Republican KKK members have you heard of? I'd dare say little to none

      Ummmmm David Duke is Republican and also a grand wizard. The roles have reversed in this country. The Democrats were once the party of racists. The Democrats are now more tolerant of peoples race. This is also reflected in the switch in the deep south from Democrat to Republican. Yep the south is racist. Remember the segregated prom in Georgia last year?

      Get your facts straight before calling some one an idiot..... idiot.

    8. Re:Communism by bombadillo · · Score: 1

      If you can't beat 'em, arrange to have 'em beaten.

      Interesting that your .sig is "If you can't beat 'em, arrange to have 'em beaten.". Yep, I was right, White christian guilt all the way.

    9. Re:Communism by Sethb · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're only telling half the story though. It used to be called the "Solid South" for the Democratic party, until a little something called the Civil Rights Act. Once the Northern Democrats and LBJ got their way and actually started granting rights to blacks living in the South, the Democratic party lost a large percentage of the southern white voters over that single issue. There are still some of the old Democrats hanging around, like Zell Miller, who didn't change party association, even though they no longer hold mainstream Democratic viewpoints, but by and large, the South has been ceded to the Republican party. Commission a poll from Gallup that correlates Party ID with this question: "Do you approve or disapprove of interracial marriage?" You'll have all the answers you need about which party contains the most racists. I'm also curious to hear your theories about why black voters overwhelmingly vote Democratic, since the Republican party is apparently so progressive.

      --
      When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
    10. Re:Communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, technically, there was no Democratic party at that time. The Republican party was the 'liberal' party of the time and the Whigs (of which Lincoln was a member) was the 'conservative' party.

      I believe black civil rights have been advanced further and quicker by the modern Democratic party than any other (unfortunately).

      Appointing any member minority group into a higher governmental position does not mean that that group as a whole is being advanced, only the person being appointed.

      Non-linear thinking is a good thing, but only when applied using factual information. It would be worth your while to do some research before considering someone an idiot or considering chucking chlorine into the gene pool. You might find *yourself* smelling like bleach.

    11. Re:Communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right about the early Democrats, but "Yep the south is racist" sounds like you are the one hiding from the facts.

      I'm not white. I've lived happily in the South most of my life. What I have discovered living elsewhere, is that most racist in the USA live in the northeastern and midwest.

      As southerns, we've had our bad moments - and they have been broadcast to the world. The fact is more racial violence was committed in Boston during school desegregated an in given year through the 70s than the past 50 years in the south.

    12. Re:Communism by cobray · · Score: 0

      What about Democratic Senator Robert "KKK" Byrd As I remember it was the republicans who passed the voting rights act of 64 Dumbass

    13. Re:Communism by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      When did Republicans win back the South by becoming segregationists? Examples? Republicans, as a whole, have always be the party of racial inclusion and still are. THAT's history. The Democrats depend on bogotry and racism. Jesse Jackson and the like gain power by convincing blacks that the "man" is always out to get them. Conservatives are the ones telling blacks. "You can rise above based on YOUR power, not someone else's." And to the moron who said "The South is racist" he must live on an island. Racism exists everywhere and it goes both ways. Just today a co-worker recounted a story of how he gave a guy he worked with a ride home. The guy was black and from the "oh so tolerant North." The guy told him, "This wouldn't happen back home. A black guy would never get a ride home from a white guy. Just doesn't happen." Face it.

    14. Re:Communism by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the tolerance of the Democrats regarding an outdated method of judging personal worth that no one uses anymore is truly astounding. Now, if they could just learn to be tolerant about, you know, actual cultural differences, they'd be set.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    15. Re:Communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look up your facts. David Duke is not a republican.

    16. Re:Communism by rjh · · Score: 1

      I'll meet your David Duke and raise you a Robert Byrd.

      Yes, that Robert Byrd of the United States Congress, the Democratic archliberal, was a Klansman.

    17. Re:Communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong.

      "I've just handed the South to the Republicans for fifty years, certainly for the rest of our life times."

      --LBJ, after signing the Civil Rights act of 1964.

      Why? Because it was the DEMOCRATS that pushed it through over republican objections (although the objections were probably due more to questions of federalism rather than racisim).

      It's called education. It may help ya.

    18. Re:Communism by ahkbarr · · Score: 1

      Commission a poll from Gallup that correlates Party ID with this question: "Do you approve or disapprove of interracial marriage?" You'll have all the answers you need about which party contains the most racists.

      You seem to be saying that if one party has more racists, that means the party itself is racist or has a platform more friendly to racists. What you don't get is that racists are by definition very stupid, and not qualified to be definitive of every organization they join.

      Another point I would like to make is that the demoncratic party loves racial prejudice, quotas, etc. Whatever the intent, it's racial discrimination just the same, and more so because it's purpose is for "getting even".

      Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.

      --
      Compared to war, all other forms of human endeavor shrink to insignificance. God, how I love it. - Gen. George Patton
  19. The way I've seen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Dress up like a Dragon and sneek into the public square.

    2. For deeper infiltration you can dress as a woman and climb the wall with a sash.

    (See Mulan for more information).

  20. Necessity.. by pploco · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why do you think China has some of the best hackers in the world? The "necessity is the mother ...." comes to mind.

    --
    Gimme that booze you little pumpkin pie hair cutted freak!
  21. Takedown notice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Please give me instructions on subverting the most populated country on the planet."

    Talk about attracting attention.

  22. It's relative by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    What you call censorship is relative depending on who you ask. But one thing I can guarantee you is that China's most expensive city (Shanghai) is way cheaper than a comparable US city.

    1. Re:It's relative by demachina · · Score: 1

      Duh...

      Do you mean when you go there with a fist full of American dollars its way cheaper, or do you mean if you are living there working for $0.30-$1.00 an hour its way cheaper.

      In case you didn't know the Chinese peg their currency to the U.S. dollar to insure that its at an artificially low level so EVERYTHING in China is cheap compared to America by design. That's why Chinese goods are so cheap in America, and why the are wiping out whole sectors of the American economy because no one in the U.S. can compete on this tilted playing field. And its why American's are rushing to China, like this guy probably is, to try and cash in on the boom there while the American economy is tanking. China is the next dot.com bubble and a gold rush in one.

      I was overjoyed to hear a few days ago some of our elected representatives in Congress are going to attempt to pass a bill to pass tariffs on Chinese goods though I wager it will die a quick death at the hands of the Bush administration and the New Republican party. These Congressmen don't really even want tariffs but they do want to put enough pressure on China to force them to let their currency float and force them to be subject to market forces and at least eliminate one of the tools they are using to destroy the U.S. economy. The U.S. simply can't sustain a half trillion a year trade deficit for very long. All of the wealth the U.S. treasures so much will be quickly drained out of the country.

      You might retort that the U.S. economy is doing just fine. Well a reason it looks fine is cheap Chinese goods and expansion by American companies in China are making the U.S. look prosperous but it is false prosperity, and eventually a grim reaper will surface from the trade deficit, and the complete collapse of productive work in America.

      --
      @de_machina
  23. It's needed.. by priestx · · Score: 0

    China wants a part of the tech. world. They've gained the respect of being the largest bootleg and spammers in the world, and the censorship will give them some credit to a bright tech china. Or just a Japanese wannabes. All considered, it's needed.

    --
    "To be is to do." -Socrates
    "To do is to be." -Jean-Paul Sartre
    "Do-be-do-be-do." -Frank Sinatra
    1. Re:It's needed.. by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

      They've gained the respect of being the largest bootleg and spammers in the world, and the censorship will give them some credit to a bright tech china. Or just a Japanese wannabes. All considered, it's needed.

      I love it when someone tries to justify censorship. As in, "no need to make your mind up for yourself".

  24. Try this to avoid censorship... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What methods and technologies are you aware of or use to circumvent the Great Firewall of China?

    Easy: Stay in the fucking USA.

  25. Better Yet by fenris_23 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why don't you move to China and do all of those things while maintaining a blog of your adventure. Thus, if your blog suddenly disappears or is abandoned, then we will know for sure what happens in China when you do those things..

  26. freenet by zymano · · Score: 1

    Try freenet .

    1. Re:freenet by Riddlefox · · Score: 1

      freeet.sourceforge.net is blocked by the Great Firewall.

  27. And the dragon comes in the night? by Daravon · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Whoa! Did he just ask for people to openly admit what technologies they're using to bypass a strict government firewall? Granted on Slashdot you'll end up with a lot of theories, but actually phrasing you question in a way meant to try to get Chinese law breakers to not only admit that they're breaking the law but to also share the method being used to break the laws......the mind boggles.

    --
    I traded all my mod points for these magic beans.
    1. Re:And the dragon comes in the night? by cbelle13013 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the submitter IS the Chinese Government!

  28. To help fit in by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    To help fit in when you go to China, I suggest you participate in one of their native religions. This will help you get along great in your new home.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  29. another troll post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what is the point of this, seriously? It appears Solo Han is asking for advice on committing illegal activities in China.

    People ought to obey the laws of the country to which they are moving to. If you don't like the laws, don't move there.

  30. The one question you have to ask yourself is. by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is the danger of getting around the censors worth it? Do you have a family? How do you feel about going to a Chinese prison?
    I do not know what the legal climate in China is but you may want to think about about it very carefully. What risk will you be putting yourself and or your family if you get caught? It could be as little as a polite warning or getting run over by a tank.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:The one question you have to ask yourself is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I counted four questions in your post.

    2. Re:The one question you have to ask yourself is. by killmenow · · Score: 1

      Actually, the one question you've got to ask yourself is this:

      Do I feel lucky?

      Well, do ya punk?

    3. Re:The one question you have to ask yourself is. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I would say one question.
      Is it worth it? The rest are just showing what is at risk.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  31. is the censorship that real? by DeusExMalex · · Score: 1

    pay no attention to the fact that i'm writing down all these techniques on bypassing our - i mean their security and finding ways to make our - i mean their censorship more difficult - i mean easy to get around. nevermind the fact that the people providing these services will all be dissapearing soon...

  32. I'd tell you, but.... by geekd · · Score: 3, Funny

    What methods and technologies are you aware of or use to circumvent the Great Firewall of China

    I'd tell you, but then they'd have to kill me.

    -geekd

  33. obvious... by m33p · · Score: 1

    If you've got ssh and access to a server outside of china the rest should be pretty obvious...

  34. tor.eff.net? by guanno · · Score: 3, Informative

    I wonder if tor works from inside the great firewall of China. Any Chinese folks who've tried it and care to comment?

  35. Consequences by Malc · · Score: 1

    "This brings me to my overall question: is the censorship that real, that hard to get around, and how do you do it?"

    If you're going to ask this, shouldn't also be wondering about the consequences if you do any of these things? Otherwise how will you make a reasonable judgement on whether it's worthwhile or not?

  36. List of Chinese Banned Websites by clotito · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is a comprehensive list of sites banned in China: http://asp-cyber.law.harvard.edu/filtering/list.ht ml

    1. Re:List of Chinese Banned Websites by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 0, Troll

      " http://www.elitemrp.net - 8/31/2002 3:44:14 PM"

      No! My site is filtered =(

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    2. Re:List of Chinese Banned Websites by theNote · · Score: 1

      Wow.
      Slashdot is on the list.

    3. Re:List of Chinese Banned Websites by vurg · · Score: 1

      Goatse is also banned. They surely got that one right.

    4. Re:List of Chinese Banned Websites by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Strange...I'm browsing slashdot right now on a direct connection, without any proxy.

      If I were you, I wouldn't particularly trust anything that comes out of Harvard University without verifiying it first. Truth is not their first objective.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:List of Chinese Banned Websites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep that Petbunny Blogspot is quite subversive.

      And they're sharp to block both payboy.com and playboy.com.

    6. Re:List of Chinese Banned Websites by clotito · · Score: 1

      How dare you speak ill of the dead! Why I remember the day Kingfox alerted us to the site's suspension ::sniffle:: I couldn't believe it at first, but with time came acceptance. ....stupid Christmas Island Internet Administration...

    7. Re:List of Chinese Banned Websites by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I think you were going for "prayboy".

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    8. Re:List of Chinese Banned Websites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comprehensive? Maybe not.

    9. Re:List of Chinese Banned Websites by ross.w · · Score: 2, Informative

      This list is not very accurate. I was able to browse lots of these sites while I was in China two years ago.

      I think some of them get banned only when they contain China related news the Government doesn't want you to see.

      I used to watch BBC World a lot from my Hotel room when I was there for two months (not much else on in English) I noticed it disappeared for a while when there was a news item about protests in Hong Kong, but it wasn't consistent.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    10. Re:List of Chinese Banned Websites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you were going for "prayboy".

      Get your jingoism right.. The slurry of 'ell' to 'err' is for Japanese, not any of the Chinese spoken languages.

    11. Re:List of Chinese Banned Websites by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, the very subversive "homestarrunner.com".
      They afraid someone might email strong bad asking him what the thinks about the current crackdown on the Falun Gong and get "Free Country USA" to help them out?

    12. Re:List of Chinese Banned Websites by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

      sourceforge.net is banned! fortunately berlios.de is not.

      --
      #
      #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
      #
    13. Re:List of Chinese Banned Websites by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

      and debian.org and redhat.com, and google.com (really!). oh my...

      --
      #
      #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
      #
    14. Re:List of Chinese Banned Websites by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Strange...I'm browsing slashdot right now on a direct connection, without any proxy. If I were you, I wouldn't particularly trust anything that comes out of Harvard University without verifiying it first. Truth is not their first objective.

      More important to realize is that this list shows slashdot.org being blocked three years ago and that actually doing a little reading on the page there clearly states that that's not intended to be a definitive list and that many sites were to be unblocked. The list is simply outdated, not an attempt to mislead. Honestly, referencing a two year old dataset like that was shoddy work on the part of the original poster, not Harvard.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    15. Re:List of Chinese Banned Websites by Cheeko · · Score: 1
      More accurately they have a complex system in place starting at the router level and working down, that evaluates traffic and content.

      There was a talk about the Great Firewall at this past summers HOPE conference. I'm not sure how much you can get out of just the audio without the slides, but you can find the talk HERE entitled "How the Great Firewall Works". Its about halfway down the page.

    16. Re:List of Chinese Banned Websites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This list is hopelessly inaccurate.

      I live in China about half the time. While there, I can access the New York Times, BBC, National Public Radio, US Government websites, *everything* having to do with Linux or tech in general (yes, slashdot), etc, etc.

      Sometimes, on some connections, I can't get groklaw. This seems to be a routing problem (DNS resolves, but the bits never come through). I have had similar problems in parts of the US, too. (Is groklaw on a funny side spur of the net???)

      What you *can't* get direct access to is anything having to do with:
      Taiwan
      Tibet
      Chinese Human Rights
      Falun Gong
      Porn

      I bet you can't get anything about North Korea, either.

      Lots of people use proxies to get their hands on all of that stuff, though.

      Basically, the Chinese government won't care what you are doing unless you are trying to *organize* something having to do with a sensitive issue, or you are breaking the law in order to get access to whatever they are making a stink about today. So, I would lay off the porn, since they have been *very* active about that recently. This goes for Chinese citizens as much as for foreigners: the gov't just doesn't have the time or the energy to do more than simple blocking of a few sites, and they don't want to be seen as an oppressive regime.

      So...don't worry about what you do on the net, except for those things that scream "NO! DON'T DO THAT!" (like Taiwanese independence, reports on prison conditions or organizing a labor union).

    17. Re:List of Chinese Banned Websites by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      All the main search engines (I tried google, altavista and yahoo), seem to be listed there... I wonder how they are supposed to find anything in the internet then!

      And, according to the FAQ, their results are always up to date...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    18. Re:List of Chinese Banned Websites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They seem to be listing all the sites that have ever been banned, rather than just the sites banned at the moment. Note that a number of sites (such as Google) are listed multiple times, corresponding to blocks being repeatedly placed and then removed.

    19. Re:List of Chinese Banned Websites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.midgetsex.com is listed! This is an infringement of my freedom!

  37. You watch too much TV by tgd · · Score: 0

    There is a very strong anti-Chinese movement within the US, in particular, that tends to dramatically misportray the way things are there.

    And as another post, that bizarrely got moderated funny, said... its targeted at citizens, not at foreigners.

    1. Re:You watch too much TV by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So the Chinese Army did not send in tanks to stop students protesting?
      So those executions I saw where they had the people kneel and put a bullet in their brain never happened?
      So there really is freedom of religion and speech in China?
      So the Chinese government does not make huge amounts of money from prison labor?
      And the Chinese did not lob missiles over an island full of people to keep them in line?
      Just asking if these are all myths that I have seen on TV?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:You watch too much TV by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      So that whole Tiananmen Square Massacre thing was just a hoax, right? And that kid who stood in front of the tank is alive and well and wasn't really disappeared? Gotcha.

    3. re: you watch too much TV by ed.han · · Score: 2, Informative

      if people are insufficiently informed on the matter and you have access to information that balances the view more, perhaps you'd like to share it with the rest of the class?

      a lot of people have a less than positive view of the chinese government, for good reason: it's autocratic and at times has zero qualms about flexing its power: witness what happened when zhao ziyang left power. for his remorse over the violence used in tiananmen square, he was placed under house arrest since 1989. this is the former head of state. don't believe me? look here: http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/asiapcf/01/16/ch ina.zhao/

      ed

    4. Re:You watch too much TV by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 3, Informative
      I will concur with what you said, and provide examples:

      The Christian Science Monitor, which is a non-partisan newspaper I like to read online sometimes, wrote an article about Tiananmen Square. How many students were killed, run over by tanks, and otherwise butchered? The answer: We don't know. In fact, evidence is starting to show that no students were killed in the square at all. When there's no foreign reporters around, and the government is the only one that's talking, it is indeed dramatic misportrayal of the facts that tends to take over. That said, estimates of fatalities outside the square range vary, but it was *after* the peaceful protest left the square.

      Secondly, I listen to WMBI, which is decidedly right-leaning. Yet, on one of their programs, one of the church leaders in Bejing reported that the government was not stifling state-allowed religions... in fact, the government was very much hands-off. (As Christianity is the fastest-growing religion in China, it may not be coincedence.) It was a different voice from the now-familiar persecution of believers in China, although, once again, that type of persecution was reported to have gone on in the rural areas -- it just wasn't as widespread as most Americans would believe.

      I very much appreciate these examples as a welcomed, different view into what China is actually like versus what everyone says it's like.

    5. Re:You watch too much TV by Conanymous+Award · · Score: 1

      Still, Tiananmen is irrelevant in this case. If you, a foreigner, were found circumventing the Great Firewall of China or doing something else that's a serious crime under Chinese law, you wouldn't be secretly dragged to a re-education semi-auschwitz in the middle of the night. You'd probably just get deported and get a life-time ban to the country.

      People watch too much TV and they're also ignorant. That explains why the parent was modded as 'insightful'.

    6. Re:You watch too much TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      We (rightly) put down rebellions within our borders(cf. the Civil War). They are terrorism. It doesn't matter how political they are; actually, being especially political means you are committing treason and not just causing destruction.
      We execute lots of people. Why is it so important that they use cheap bullets rather than expensive injections?
      You can't joke about killing the President, you can't say some things about Scientology...
      US industry makes huge amounts of money from prison labor, with the blessing of the US gov't.
      We dropped two nukes on two cities, something nobody else has done, to keep the rest of the WORLD in line; and have waged war since.

      I love America, but are you sure you're not entertaining myths about where exactly the differences are? Or do the ends justify the means?

    7. Re:You watch too much TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. I can't believe there's actually people in the world as ignorant as you are. I figured they probably would have wound up being stillborn due to being too stupid to maintain their own life functions.

      I'd suggest you try looking up the words "Tiannamen Square" in Google and see what you come up with. That is, if you can read enough English to understand this post.

    8. Re:You watch too much TV by Tonytheloony · · Score: 1

      You do know there are such things as shades of gray?
      Your post is 100% correct, and so was the parent's, but you are not refuting anything he said.

      --
      The quickest way to become an atheist is to study the Bible thoroughly.
    9. Re:You watch too much TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the US wiped out many races of native americans... is there a word for that?

    10. Re:You watch too much TV by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Genocide?

      Ethnic cleansing?

      Urban renewal?

    11. Re:You watch too much TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love America, but are you sure you're not entertaining myths about where exactly the differences are?

      Yet you can't tell the difference between:
      Armed rebellion and an unarmed protest.

      Going to jail for expounding your political views vs. Telling a joke about the president, having some guys ask you some questions, determine it was a joke and take no further action.

      Besides which, the USA does have problems. And the rest of the world criticizes them for their problems. But the rest of the world also criticizes China for the exact same things the US does. (And more. The EU is against the death penalty)

      It is not a US myth that China is not a nice place.

    12. Re:You watch too much TV by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      " We (rightly) put down rebellions within our borders(cf. the Civil War). They are terrorism. It doesn't matter how political they are; actually, being especially political means you are committing treason and not just causing destruction."
      Okay. So a bunch of people sitting around "Saying that they want a democratic system is terrorism? Even going back to the US civil war you are saying that it is the same as shelling a military base?
      The US does execute a good number of people for murder after a trial and usually many appeals, not for protesting. There are also people protesting those executions trying to change the system. I do not see any protests in China over capital punishment.
      You can not threaten the President that is correct. You can not threaten anyone but you will not be shot or likely convicted unless you do it in a very public way. You will never go to jail for saying anything about Scientology you may get dragged into a civil suit but not jail time.

      Yes 60 years ago the US dropped two nukes on to cities of a enemy that tortured and killed millions and had attacked the US. Not to mention that they had already used Chemical and Bio weapons themselves on Chinese citizens.
      I am pretty sure that I am not entertaining too many myths. I mean really even Kent State which was a terrible act does not hold a candle to the actions of the Chinese government. At least in the US people can comment on that act and say that it was wrong. That freedom is not available in China.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    13. Re:You watch too much TV by mc6809e · · Score: 1, Interesting

      There is a very strong anti-Chinese movement within the US, in particular, that tends to dramatically misportray the way things are there.

      There's also a very strong anti-USA movement within the US that tends to dramatically misportray the way things are there.

      Many of the posts on /. are examples.

    14. Re:You watch too much TV by LeiGong · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So the US government isn't unlawfully detaining thousands oin Cuba without a trial? So that whole Iran-Contra thing was just a myth cooked up by the media? So is it really ok to show an exposed boobie on national tv? So that whole Waco thing is just dust under the carpet? What about the US government's constant intervention in South American politics. Weren't we the ones that supplied Saddam with WMD in the first place? Wasn't this the government that beat black protesters in the 60s? What about how we dealt with Cuba in the past? Just asking if these are all myths that I have seen on TV? My point is, governments are flawed, you'd be hard pressed to find a large nation of 100+ million that haven't done something stupid or illegal. But to use those examples to equate the entire country or government and its everyday affairs as evil is short-sighted and ignorant. America is still the most free country in the world but you wouldn't believe me if you only looked at the bullet points above.

    15. Re:You watch too much TV by danheskett · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We (rightly) put down rebellions within our borders(cf. the Civil War). They are terrorism. It doesn't matter how political they are; actually, being especially political means you are committing treason and not just causing destruction.
      The civil war was 150 years ago. Today, when there are protestors, we let them have at it, and mostly just watch until the destruction is over. If the police overstep their roles or break the law they put on trial, fined, or fired.

      We execute lots of people. Why is it so important that they use cheap bullets rather than expensive injections?
      We execute a relative few. In the whole country somewhere between 200 and 300 people per year. The average stay on death row is between 5 and 10 years. The average death row inmate has had between 3 and 5 lawyers. The average death row inmmate has been in court and in front of a judge at least 6 times. None of these things is true about China. It has nothing to do with the cost of the bullet. It has everything to do with the process. China hems and haws about even disclosing how many people it executes. There is no presumption of innocence. There is no right to appeal. No right to seek a pardon.

      You can't joke about killing the President
      You can in fact joke about killing the President. You cannot enter into a conspiracy to kill the President (or anyone). You cannot solicit people to kill the the President (or anyone). You cannot ask that another person should kill a person. If you do make statemnets amount about the President and killing him you likely will get investigated by the Secret Service to determine if you have entered into a plot to kill the President. If you haven't then nothing happens. You can say anything about Scientology. You cannot republish copyright protected documents without permission. If you do, you may be sued and/or receive a letter from an attorney

      We dropped two nukes on two cities, something nobody else has done, to keep the rest of the WORLD in line; and have waged war since.
      No, we dropped two nukes for the explict purpose of defeating Japan. Even after the first they did not surrender. Hence the second. We showed restrainant when others would have shown known. After World War II we had the most powerful military in the history of the world. We had the most power economy in the history of the world. Our economic engine was producing war time goods at a rate that all the nations of the world combined could not match our power. We could have dominated the world, and who would have opposed us? The peasantry of China? The ruins that once were great nations in Europe? The decimated demoralized Soviets? In 1945 we could have rolled over the world, dominating and taking anything we wanted. There were no limits to the power we could project. Europe, Africa, Asia - even China would be fall to their knees in realization of American power. Yet we did not puruse that course. We rebuilt Germany. We brought democracy to Japan. We liberated and left France. We helped our sworn enemies. We established a home land in the middle east for the Jews out of compassion and remorse for a crime we did not commit.

      I love America. And I've spent my life loving America. I'll never deny our collective mistakes but I will certainly not equate them to the routine barbary that is found so often and with such foulness across the world. America has its many problems. America is flawed, and growing more so. But it will be a cold day in hell when you can equte America with communist China.

      The fact remains that the Bill of Rights - even in its decaying form - offers more protection, more glorious freedom, more liberty than most people of the world dare to aspire to obtain.

    16. Re:You watch too much TV by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Slavery, the KKK, Prohibition, the War On Drugs and McCarthyism

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    17. Re:You watch too much TV by operagost · · Score: 1
      Secondly, I listen to WMBI, which is decidedly right-leaning. Yet, on one of their programs, one of the church leaders in Bejing reported that the government was not stifling state-allowed religions
      Oh goodie! As long as you're an Evangelical Atheist, United Atheist, Roman Catholic Atheist, or Southern Atheist!
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    18. Re:You watch too much TV by Thunderstruck · · Score: 1

      We (rightly) put down rebellions within our borders(cf. the Civil War). They are terrorism. It doesn't matter how political they are; actually, being especially political means you are committing treason and not just causing destruction.

      Are you equating nonviolent protest with terrorism?
      Was president Davis or General Lee charged with treason? Or are you making a bad comparison?

      We execute lots of people. Why is it so important that they use cheap bullets rather than expensive injections?

      We execute people for high crimes, not for having ideas with which we do not agree.

      You can't joke about killing the President, you can't say some things about Scientology...

      Yes you can. Just be prepared for bogus lawsuits or social pressures as a result of being investigated.

      US industry makes huge amounts of money from prison labor, with the blessing of the US gov't.

      Most prison labor is limited to government contracts. Care to elaborate which industry is making money from these lost contracts?

      I think the point your post misses most, is that everyone has a right to speak freely and hold what ideas they will. This is not some wonder granted by a sheet of paper in a vault in Washington D.C. It is a natural right owned by all human beings, innate, or if you prefer endowed by their creator.

      --
      Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
    19. Re:You watch too much TV by shokk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Business as usual on planet earth.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    20. Re:You watch too much TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod the parent up.

    21. Re:You watch too much TV by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Yet, on one of their programs, one of the church leaders in Bejing reported that the government was not stifling state-allowed religions

      How about state-disallowed religions?

      The Christian Science Monitor, which is a non-partisan newspaper I like to read online sometimes, wrote an article about Tiananmen Square. How many students were killed, run over by tanks, and otherwise butchered? The answer: We don't know. In fact, evidence is starting to show that no students were killed in the square at all. When there's no foreign reporters around, and the government is the only one that's talking, it is indeed dramatic misportrayal of the facts that tends to take over. That said, estimates of fatalities outside the square range vary, but it was *after* the peaceful protest left the square.

      Wait, so the Chinese killed the protesters AFTER they dispersed from the square, and that's somehow better?

      I've seen photographs of Chinese protesters turned into paste underneath the tracks of PLA tanks. Was that dramatic misportrayal?

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    22. Re:You watch too much TV by XopherMV · · Score: 1

      Mod parent UP! That was damn good. Here, here!

    23. Re:You watch too much TV by Cee · · Score: 1

      The Christian Science Monitor, which is a non-partisan newspaper I like to read online sometimes

      Off-topic, I know... Anyway,
      The Christian Science Monitor is published by a church called Christian Science, which can be categorized under "New Religious Movements". I wouldn't quote a source like that, because I don't know about their values, what they believe in and their agendas. And just because you say that it's non-partisan doesn't make it so. It may be, or it may not be.

    24. Re:You watch too much TV by jgoemat · · Score: 1
      We (rightly) put down rebellions within our borders(cf. the Civil War). They are terrorism. It doesn't matter how political they are; actually, being especially political means you are committing treason and not just causing destruction.
      But do we send in tanks to run over non-violent student protesters?
      We execute lots of people. Why is it so important that they use cheap bullets rather than expensive injections?
      But do we do it because someone spoke out against the government's policies?
    25. Re:You watch too much TV by pestilence4hr · · Score: 1
      Secondly, I listen to WMBI, which is decidedly right-leaning. Yet, on one of their programs, one of the church leaders in Bejing reported that the government was not stifling state-allowed religions... in fact, the government was very much hands-off.
      I have no idea what things are like inside of China, but your anectode is by no means evidence that the government goes easy on religion. In fact, it sounds exactly like what a religious leader inside China would say if he feared a government reprisal.
    26. Re:You watch too much TV by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      America is still the most free country in the world

      I'm from Paraguay, and I can tell you that there is much more freedom there than in the US (having lived in both). Its also more corrupt, and its law enforcement is not nearly as good, but there is still more freedom. If you want freedom, go to any third world country, I'm sure they (with a few exceptions) are more free than the US.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    27. Re:You watch too much TV by Dr.+Weird · · Score: 1
      We execute lots of people. Why is it so important that they use cheap bullets rather than expensive injections?

      We execute people for high crimes, not for having ideas with which we do not agree.

      Did the Waco/Koresh incident involve a high crime?

    28. Re:You watch too much TV by spagetti_code · · Score: 1

      Lets check these 'facts':

      So the Chinese Army did not send in tanks to stop students protesting?
      - The US Govt has used the army against its own population. Check the protests in the 60's. The US regularly uses its army both overtly (iraq, grenada) and covertly (cambodia, iran, south america) against other countries.

      So those executions I saw where they had the people kneel and put a bullet in their brain never happened?
      - The US executes a truck-load of people. In fact, this is a problem highlighted by both Amnesty International and the US Supreme Court.

      So there really is freedom of religion and speech in China?
      - Freedom on religion and speech? No problem (as long as you are not a muslim). Yes, I will conceded that on this point, the US does provide significantly more freedoms.

      And the Chinese did not lob missiles over an island full of people to keep them in line?
      - The US government regularly lobs missiles into cities and towns (iraq, afghanistan). Dont be fooled into thinking these 'smart bombs' are really that smart - 17,000 iraqis can't be wrong (but they are dead).

      - TV does propogate myths in both directions - dont believe everything your overlords tell you.

    29. Re:You watch too much TV by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As you said there is not a one to one mach for any of them.
      Look at the posts.
      The first one is critical of the reduction of US civil liberties after 9/11. Okay so this is the same as sending in tanks to stop protesters? Plus it is "critical" of government policy! Try that in China.
      The next one has this line in it "Ross, a convicted serial murderer who has admitted killing eight women in the 1980s, says he wants to waive his appeals and die". How is this even close to killing someone for protesting? How long has his case been going through the system? How many checks and balances? I want to see the my nation stop capital punishment. If I was Chinese could I say that on a public forum?

      Your next link is critical of reductions in personal freedom since 9/11. Notice that it is critical of them plus no of the examples of abuses are running students over with tanks for protesting.
      You next one on freedom of speech totally a none issue. A company stopped hosting a website. Not the government but a private company. Get a new hosting company. For all we know they did not pay there bill.
      The link on making money on prisoners. This is critical of some local cities for seeing prisons as a source of jobs. You know construction, catering, and staff. Not using prisoners for slave labor. No shade here.
      Finally the last link. Again it is critical of US policy. It talks about problems the US is having gathering information in Afghanistan. From you link "The experiences of Shamsulrachman, the villager in Sawai, suggest differences in treatment. He says marines searched his house recently and found nothing. But when they discovered a shell casing outside of a neighbor's house that he says dated from the Soviet era, they told him they were going to arrest him. He says the Marines were civil,"
      I do not see any match here.
      Your last link... Could you have a page like that in China?

      The original post was that China is not as bad as you think and the media over states the problems.
      Of course the US is not perfect, no country is. Where are you on the whole safer and free? Your post pretty much proves my point.
      Is the US perfect? You do not think so? Lets talk about it. Let's try and improve things. Hey we could try and let others know about the things we feel need changing.
      Is China perfect..... Let's just say that it is. The is for the best.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    30. Re:You watch too much TV by EinarH · · Score: 1
      No they are not myths, but its important that you put them in perspective.
      So the Chinese Army did not send in tanks to stop students protesting?
      Yes, they did. But recent studies vary on the number of casualties though from 25 to several thousand. And remeber that also USA used soldiers against protesting students in the early 70's. IIRC they actually shot and killed 4 at some University during a peacefull protest. Not thanks exactly, but still its not that far fetched to belive that it _could_ have happend in USA only some years before. People don't like to think about stuff like that but it _could__ have happend under Nixon or Reagan too. Maybe not as violent and massive, but still. In this perspecive 20 years is quite short.
      So those executions I saw where they had the people kneel and put a bullet in their brain never happened?
      Both USA and China use the deathpenalty as a deterrent against crime. OK I'll admit that you don't use the telly to broadcast it but media is quite involved in it anyway.
      So there really is freedom of religion and speech in China?
      In some parts of China most people can practise their religion to some extent as long as they don't activly engage in some activities. Free speech is quite limited though. All this might seem very restrictive to us free speachers but to most people over there are quite ignorant about it.
      So the Chinese government does not make huge amounts of money from prison labor?
      Not really. Just as in former Soviet and USA today they fail it here. All three countries are (were for Soviet) trying to recooup some of their prisoning costs by slave labour. But becasue of ineffectiveness, beurocracy etc. it fails.
      And the Chinese did not lob missiles over an island full of people to keep them in line?
      Well I'lll guess you didn't participate in those _enourmous_ NATO or USA/Japan/SK fleet excercises in the North Atlantic and Pacific in the eighties. I can't see how they differ much from what China did towards Taiwan.

      Overall China got some pretty black marks on their "internal affairs" record but then again USA got some pretty bad remarks on their foreign policy record too*. Please not that I'm not exusing those bad things that are happening in China, just pointing out that if you look at it with those big history glasses it might not look as bad as you are implying. Just as those "bad things" in US foreign policy don't negate the fact that USA has been an overall postitive factor in the last 100+ years**.

      *Iran, Chile, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Iraq, Guantanamo etc.
      **That might have changed under Bush though..

      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    31. Re:You watch too much TV by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Never forget any of them. Talk about them that is how Prohibition and McCartyism where ended. Slavery that took a war over 100 years ago. The KKK can't blame that on the goverment. War On Drugs. Debate it. The difference is you can debate them.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    32. Re:You watch too much TV by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      "So the Chinese Army did not send in tanks to stop students protesting?"

      Yup...kinda like GWB put protesters in 'free speech zones' miles from where their protest could have any impact whatsoever, and like the police where instructed to harshly break up any protests the past couple of years.

      "So those executions I saw where they had the people kneel and put a bullet in their brain never happened?"

      Yup, they did: but then again, not only does the US also have the deathpenalty, but one could very well argue that theirs is a more humane alternative to torturing people for the rest of their lives in Guantanamo Bay.

      "So there really is freedom of religion and speech in China?"

      Pretty much: the only religion banned is Falun Gong; christians, budhists etc etc etc have free reign. But don't go sp[eaking revolution, or you'll get a visit which looks pretty much like how the Secret Service shows up on your doorstep if you say something derogetory about the US Prez.

      "So the Chinese government does not make huge amounts of money from prison labor?"

      Nah...they make a bit of money, but not gopbs of cash...manual labour just doesn't bring in the bacan like high-tech. Just look at the income american prisons get from their manual labour, which operates under pretty much the same policy. And if you want to see the darker side of it, go look at what happens in Texan jails.

      "And the Chinese did not lob missiles over an island full of people to keep them in line?"

      Didn't hit Taiowan, just let 'em know who has the big guns. Kinda exactly unlike what the US is doing in the middle east: the US is bombing the hell out of shit, creating a massive deathcount, destabalising a country and the whole region...and that's somehow better than just launching a missile and not hitting anything?

      "Just asking if these are all myths that I have seen on TV?"

      No...but there is this saying about casting stones and sin, and another one about beams of wood and splinters in your own or someone else's eyes.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    33. Re:You watch too much TV by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "So the Chinese Army did not send in tanks to stop students protesting?"

      Yup...kinda like GWB put protesters in 'free speech zones' miles from where their protest could have any impact whatsoever, and like the police where instructed to harshly break up any protests the past couple of years."
      Kind of like???? Are you out of your cotton picking mind!!!!! Getting run over by a tank or arrested and executed is kind of like being told where to stand? That is just insane!!!!

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    34. Re:You watch too much TV by damiangerous · · Score: 1
      We (rightly) put down rebellions within our borders(cf. the Civil War). They are terrorism.

      Whoa. The American Civil War was neither a rebellion nor "terrorism". Nor was it justified. In fact a group of states said "Hey, remember when we joined up in this Union we only did so with the understanding that we're a loose Union of sovereign states who can leave this Union at any time. Well, we're going to exercise that right now." Lincoln said, "I'm altering the agreement, Pray I don't alter it further" and illegally attacked the seceding States to prevent them from leaving. It's only considered "justified" because the North won. Lincoln was entirely in the wrong legally and engaged in some very morally questionable practices to achieve his ends.

    35. Re:You watch too much TV by mugnyte · · Score: 1

      Dude, you're seriously out of touch with modern US politics. Since when did your 1940's US engaged in a Preemptive War Of Self Defense? I can only hope someday our administration is tried for war crimes.

    36. Re:You watch too much TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact remains that the Bill of Rights - even in its decaying form - offers more protection, more glorious freedom, more liberty than most people of the world dare to aspire to obtain.

      Including most Americans.

    37. Re:You watch too much TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent UP! That was damn good. Here, here!

      It's "hear, hear!" you moron! Can you here me? WTF!

    38. Re:You watch too much TV by futuretaikonaut · · Score: 2, Informative

      I call bullshit on your statement about dropping tha tomic bomb on Japan. Japan had already attempted to surrender to Moscow weeks before Hiroshima. The Americans hamstringed that attempt. We dropped the bomb on Japan specifically because we wanted to ensure that the Japanese surrendered to the United States, instead of the Soviets. Don't forget that just months earlier we were learning how Europe was being divided up. We didn't want another East Germany at the helm of one of the most titanic war machines ever built.

      the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were one of the greatest massacres in the history of the world, and the United States has to live up to that fact. Although most historians agree that we did it to stop the Soviets, I doubt that popular opinion will ever coincide with this until all the WWII vets are dead and gone.

      If you doubt me, read "The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb, and The Architecture of an American Myth." by Gar Alperovitz. Read a scholarly article on the question here: http://www.progressive.org/zinn0800.htm (admittedly, Zinn is not the best authority to speak of, but his article can stand as the general opinion of US historians)

      This book is a scholarly work that is corroborated by scores of historians, not some dimestore reaction book. Before you go spouting off trash about the murder of tens of thousands of civilians, you better know your facts.

    39. Re:You watch too much TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm...yes...but you forget that some people do not want the freedoms that the bill of rights offers. So you think you should force it on them?

    40. Re:You watch too much TV by XopherMV · · Score: 1

      Lol... then where would they find the one to mod up?

    41. Re:You watch too much TV by mlh1996 · · Score: 1

      You are right to question the bias of any source. In this case, CS Monitor is generally accepted to be the best source for unbiased news in this country. Whatever values and agendas the Church itself may have don't seem to bleed over into their newspaper.

      --
      Lack of creativity is no excuse for not having a .sig
    42. Re:You watch too much TV by Borderlinebass · · Score: 1

      Then what would the response be to the routine barbarity apparent in the horrific sancations on Cuba? What about the "economic pressure" on Iraq that the UNICEF study concluded took 500,000 lives? The disgrace in our support of attacks on civilian targets Nicaruagua? What about the inhumanity inherent in installing Sadaam Hussien as a ruler? The utter GENOCIDE of the indiginous people of the United States?

      Saying "But Virginia, we are better than them!" is real, real easy when you only pick a few of the lightest examples we have to offer and compare them to the worst that somewhere else has to offer.

      And look at some of the parent's own answers; It's a ready fact that the massive economic sanctions that the U.S. helped inpose in the wake of WW1 were more than a little bit responsibile for creating the conditions that allowed hitler to take power. That compassionate gift to the Jews dispossed an entire region of innocent people, and condemned them to the hell of being a stateless people, without rights, jobs, or prospects for the future. Good for the U.S! As for the comments about the death penalty... is your arguement really that our subjective criteria (That are often wrong - the Death Row DNA project has proved that dozens of times.) are better than China's? Perhaps in quantity, but it's still utter barbarism.

      American blindness is almost...sad...to watch in action.

      --
      Fight for something better: www.socialistalternative.org
    43. Re:You watch too much TV by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Awesome, simply awesome post!

    44. Re:You watch too much TV by DaFallus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We established a home land in the middle east for the Jews out of compassion and remorse for a crime we did not commit.

      Actually, what we did is basically break down the door to the home of some muslims and say "here you go Stein, this is your new home".

      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
    45. Re:You watch too much TV by bani · · Score: 1

      cs monitor is highly regarded as one of the best unbiased newspapers in the nation. pretty weird to be published by a religious movement that is known to be more than just a little nutty, but apparently they are well able to separate religion and politics from their journalism.

      it's not just him who says it's non partisan. it's widely accepted by journalistic experts.

    46. Re:You watch too much TV by beermonster1984 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What's this fucking WE shit??? Grow up.

    47. Re:You watch too much TV by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      The person that mod'd this informative obviously didn't bother to read the links [classic /.]

      His analogy of "had the people kneel and put a bullet" link to a serial killer that killed 8 women in 1980's is absurd. This guy has had more appeals than a banana farm! It's not like we found him and executed him on the side of the road with the due process of law.

    48. Re:You watch too much TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those two nukes were dropped when the government knew the Japanese were going to surrender. They dropped those bombs just to see what they would do. The Smithsonian was going to do a bit of an exhibit and the people there got told from some government folk they'd better "change your name, grow a beard and leave the country" if they were going to go ahead with it.

      If I could remember which documentry that came from I'd quote the source.

      And the post-war effort was a subtle attempt to take over a large portion of the world in ways that most of the people wouldn't/haven't noticed.
      Germany and Japan were rebuilt for selfish purposes - the post war stuff I could quote oodles of stuff on, but frankly a) I don't have the time b) I'm responding to a zealot - information isn't going to help.

      Most of the well travlled people I know are stunned by the methods and the level of indoctrination in America more than anywhere else - at least in China the cards are on the table. They probably don't have the irony of people indoctrinated to love the word "Freedom (TM)"...

    49. Re:You watch too much TV by AutoTheme · · Score: 1

      WOW! This has to be the best and truest post I have EVER read on slashdot! Great job!

    50. Re:You watch too much TV by AutoTheme · · Score: 1

      Yeah dude, read "The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb and The Architecture of an American Myth", (toke, toke, gurgle, gurgle) then watch Fahrenheit 911! (toke, toke, gurgle, gurgle) Then you'll see all the facts and the real deal and all! (toke, toke, gurgle, gurgle) Awe man, can't you see it? They're doing it man... It's all there, you can read it and see it... (toke, toke, gurgle, gurgle)

    51. Re:You watch too much TV by Quanza · · Score: 1

      No, we dropped two nukes for the explict purpose of defeating Japan. Even after the first they did not surrender. Hence the second.

      Just to be clear, Japan didn't know what hit them and the US didn't exactly give enough time to for Japan to reassess the situation. Given the level of devastation, there was nobody left in Hiroshima to report to "higher command" about the destruction. Japan didn't have all the information to call a cease-fire let alone surrender, so the U.S. decided to drop another just 3 days later. At the time, with remote-communication fascilities most likely down, it would have taken at least that many days to get down and back from HQ (Tokyo) to give a damage assessment. Just look at the tsunami situation. It took days before people began to realize the level of carnage. And this is 50 years later!

      Here's for hoping it'll never happen again. Which unfortunately even this many years later, is not a guarantee

      --
      -Q
    52. Re:You watch too much TV by epistemology · · Score: 1

      When we were as old as Communist China we were enslaving Africans and slaughtering Native Americans to the point of extinction.

    53. Re:You watch too much TV by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      As others will I am sure tell, you are reading revisionist garbage.

      The key point that revisioners always "forget" to talk about is that the US did not drop a bomb on Japan. We droppoed TWO bombs.Japan not only did not want to "surrender" after we bombmed them, they absolutely REFUSED to surrender after we went and dropped a single nuclear bomb. It took a 2nd to convince the Emperor to over-throw the military junta ruling Japan and surrender.

      We dropped the Two Bombs on Japan for ONE purpose: To end the war with the least number of american deaths. Yes, it also put the USSR on notice, that was a side benefit that could have been accomplished with a single bomb - the 2nd bomb pretty much disproves this foolish theory, to anyone who cares more about logic than about proving their personal pet theory.

      Your "scholarly work" is a bunch of crap, and is NOT beleived to be true by any respected Historian.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    54. Re:You watch too much TV by Smurf · · Score: 1
      Japan not only did not want to "surrender" after we bombmed them, they absolutely REFUSED to surrender after we went and dropped a single nuclear bomb. It took a 2nd to convince the Emperor to over-throw the military junta ruling Japan and surrender.

      Just some food for though:

      As this guy said in another post, it was completely unrealistic to assume that, after having all Hiroshima's telecommunications infrastructure destroyed by the bomb, the Japanese leaders would have a clear picture of what had happened in only three days. (Aug 9 to Aug 11, Nagasaki was bombed in the 12th). Again as Quanza said, fifty years later we had the Southeast Asia tsunami and three days later we still didn't have anything close to a clear picture of the magnitude of the catastrophe.

      Another thing: The two atomic bombs used were completely different. (From Wikipedia):

      Hiroshima's "Little Boy": 12-15 kt - gun type Uranium-235 fission bomb
      Nagasaki's "Fat Man": 20-22 kt - implosion type Plutonium-239 fission bomb

      One of the models (not sure which) was proven to work in the trials in New Mexico. Why did the US risk a mission using a different type of bomb? What were they trying to prove? From the scientific point of view, testing both kinds of bombs in urban areas is fascinating (in a creepy kind of way).

      Does this mean that Nagasaki's bombing had a different goal other than getting Japan to surrender fast? No, it doesn't. Does it mean that maybe you should put the flag down for a second an begin to realize that what you have been told about your country for all your life may not be completely true, and that maybe it's also revisionist history? Definitely.
    55. Re:You watch too much TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you wonder why the rest of the world thinks Americans are morons.

    56. Re:You watch too much TV by nursedave · · Score: 1

      Thank you. This is one of the best, most well thought out and delivered posts on the history of slashdot. I salute you.

      --

      The Democratic Party: We've been pussies since 1968!

    57. Re:You watch too much TV by nursedave · · Score: 1

      At the risk of feeding the braying jackass... what law was broken by the administration?

      --

      The Democratic Party: We've been pussies since 1968!

    58. Re:You watch too much TV by mldqj · · Score: 1

      We could have dominated the world, and who would have opposed us? The peasantry of China? The ruins that once were great nations in Europe? The decimated demoralized Soviets?
      Remember the 2 wars that US fought in Asia after WW2? What was the outcome? Did US dominate Vietnam and Korea?

    59. Re:You watch too much TV by nursedave · · Score: 1

      I read a great book, "The Making of the Atomic Bomb," by Richard Rhodes. My understanding is that the uranium bomb was theoretically proven by the test they called 'tickling the dragon's tail,' and they didn't feel the need to test it as they were much more certain it would work. Uranium had been the 'quarterback' for quite a while in the weapons program, so there was a lot of data on it. Plutonium and its use in a bomb was a different story, so it was tested here first, then deployed. If I remember correctly, the "Little Boy" was the only one of its type built; it seems it was obsolete before it even got used. There were two other 'Fat Man' types waiting in the wings, but luckily, the Japanese sensibly surrendered "unconditionally."

      --

      The Democratic Party: We've been pussies since 1968!

    60. Re:You watch too much TV by nursedave · · Score: 1
      We didnt' install Hussien as a ruler. That we supported him in his war with Iran, with whom we were having a bit of trouble at that time, can perhaps be morally questioned. However, he installed himself, by taking over a meeting, basically, and literally having the opposition taken out into the courtyard and shot. (hint: he wasn't using American AK-47's, either)

      Economic pressure taking 500k lives -that's a damn shame. A damn shame that the pressure wasn't enough to cause the world to say, "ENOUGH, already, Saddam! Out of there! If you aren't going to cooperate, then you're GONE!" Of course, when we did just that, you goofballs just throw a hissy fit. I wish Clinton had had enough sack to do it, then it would have been a righteous - nay, religious - duty.

      American blindness is almost...sad...to watch in action
      Socialist blindness is almost...hilarious...to watch in action.
      --

      The Democratic Party: We've been pussies since 1968!

    61. Re:You watch too much TV by nursedave · · Score: 1
      scholarly article on the question here: http://www.progressive.org/zinn0800.htm
      Hahahahahahaha!! "scholarly article" on progressive.org! Sweet irony!! Hahahah, guess I'll be reading about the benefits of slavery on the NAACP website soon, or maybe "Why We Should Just Turn In Our Guns and STFU" on NRA.ORG....

      Heh, you're pretty funny, I like you.

      --

      The Democratic Party: We've been pussies since 1968!

    62. Re:You watch too much TV by nursedave · · Score: 1
      destabalising a country and the whole region
      That's equivalent to saying "Making a piece of shit smell bad." That whole region is a big sewer. The sooner there is an attempt at democratic rule, the better.
      --

      The Democratic Party: We've been pussies since 1968!

    63. Re:You watch too much TV by Lucky_Pierre · · Score: 1

      "So the US government isn't unlawfully detaining thousands oin Cuba without a trial?"

      No.Only about 500 are held there. I suggest you check the Amnesty International website. Oh, Sorry! I forgot.....you probably can't access that site from Communist China.

      http://www.amnesty.org/

      --
      "Whenever the cause of the people is entrusted to professors, it is lost." ~ V.I. Lenin
    64. Re:You watch too much TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This book is a scholarly work that is corroborated by scores of historians, not some dimestore reaction book. Before you go spouting off trash about the murder of tens of thousands of civilians, you better know your facts.


      And you'd better know your facts.. it was indeed to derail surrender to the Soviets.. and it was fucking PAYBACK. Ask anybody who was alive back then.

      Now butch the fuck up little man. You twist the dragon's tail, and he crushes your skull.
    65. Re:You watch too much TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Remember the 2 wars that US fought in Asia after WW2? What was the outcome? Did US dominate Vietnam and Korea?


      No, we got our asses waxed.. thanks to noncommittal leadership who kept the gloves on. If either war had been all out we would have prevailed. In Korea we should have kicked China's front door down and slammed em with a few nukes. In Vietnam there should have been NO limits on what could be bombed.
    66. Re:You watch too much TV by DaFallus · · Score: 1

      That is because our military is designed and organized to fight other large militaries. Even this war shows that our army is not properly equipped to fight guerillas as well as larger, more technologically advance armies. What good is a laser-guided bomb when you don't know where you drop it?

      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
    67. Re:You watch too much TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up - maybe into new topic
      a) I agree
      b) All the comments under it would be on topic, one way or another

    68. Re:You watch too much TV by kir · · Score: 1

      And of course you'll get no answer from the... he he he... "braying jackass".

      I love it!

      --
      3cx.org - A truly bad website.
    69. Re:You watch too much TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About Israel, it was established by the league of nations after WW-I but not implemented by the british who were too busy keeping the Jews from protecting ourselves (Google Hebron 1929) from Arab residents and migrant laborers to fufill their obligation. We then fought a short war against the british before the UN voted again to return our soverignty after loosing it to the Roman legions who either murdered or ethnicly cleansed almost all of the Jewish population and renamed it Palestine in 300CE (google Arch of Titus). Since the British left we have been fighting for our lives against hostile neighbors, but like our national anthem says "There is a hope"....

    70. Re:You watch too much TV by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      If I remember the people in Waco where armed. They shot several ATF agents. And they set there own place on fire.
      Was it botched? Yes. Where they executions? No.
      And yes Waco did invole a high crime. They shot serveral ATF agents.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    71. Re:You watch too much TV by danheskett · · Score: 1

      Given the level of devastation, there was nobody left in Hiroshima to report to "higher command" about the destruction.
      That's untrue. Check out the Wikipedia article on Hiroshima bombing. Cental command sent a pilot to Hiroshima within hours. He saw the complete destruction, landed, and radio'd back that the entire city was gone, wiped from earth. It was entirely clear within hours what had happened - not the specifics of what it was - but that America had a new weapon of unheard of power.

    72. Re:You watch too much TV by futuretaikonaut · · Score: 1

      I have to appreciate how your reply to my argument was prediated on A. posting anonymously. B.pulling out one of my statements and sarcastically repeating it. C. Cursing. D. Insulting my character. E. Citing revenge as good reason for atrocities. F. Ballooning your self-worth up with no back (i.e. calling yourself a dragon), and G. Using a tired cliche to propose that I have been thoroughly beaten. Truly sir, your methods of discourse surely put mine to sad shame.

    73. Re:You watch too much TV by lord+sibn · · Score: 1

      No, we did not give Hussein any WMD (nuclear|biological). We armed him with standard gear (bad enough as it is) to help him achieve his goals.

      You confuse mortars, helicopters (and the like) with "weapons of mass destruction," which they are not.

      Please keep in mind that our "search for WMD in Iraq" was recently abandoned, having turned up -nothing-. If we really armed Saddam with nuclear ICBMS (or nuclear anything), we ought to have found it by now, at least to justify our invasion to the UN. But ...nothing. Nothing at all. These are not the WMDs you are looking for...

      *waves hand dismissively*

    74. Re:You watch too much TV by mugnyte · · Score: 1

      avoid Ad hominem dude, try to stay on topic. Save the name calling for your schoolyard.

      You need to resort to "letter of the law" arguments to obscure the facts coming out of Gitmo, Iraq/n and Afganistan right now? Isn't there anything in your so-emotional post for the "concept of freedom" that perhaps the US needs more help domestically than a tiny country (out of so many) needs to change regimes?

      You were lied to man: no WMD, no link to Al Quaeda, no imminent threat. Soldiers are dying for a cause that doesn't exist. Are we safer now? No, actually we're worse off, by simply repeating the mistakes of the past. We are a bigger target, with more attackers, than when we started.

      The current US administration is wildly out of bounds regarding the spirit of almost any law: human rights, foreign affairs, UN participation, separation of church and state, manipulation of the media, manipulation of national science opinions, and management of the environment. It's been a long long time since the 1940's guy. Party's over.

    75. Re:You watch too much TV by nursedave · · Score: 1
      You are so off the mark here, it is difficult to begin, but here we go:

      You need to resort to "letter of the law" arguments

      Well, yes, being that Bush was accused of 'war crimes,' I'd like to know what 'crimes' he is accused of committing. I'm funny like that - if a cop pulls me over and says he is arresting me, I'd like to know at some point what the charges are.

      Gitmo, Iraq/n and Afganistan right now

      Such as? Come on, be specific: what facts (not complaints from terrorists who were there for fighting US forces, for which the penalty really should have been immediate, violent, explosive death - if we hadn't wanted information from these gumbas, it probably would have been) are coming out of these places that show that recently re-elected President Bush has been committing war crimes?

      You were lied to man: no WMD, no link to Al Quaeda, no imminent threat

      This in and of itself deserves a huge response; I'm just home from work and sleepy, so I'll give the short and sweet version. Hussein had 12 years to comply with the agreement he signed allowing inspectors to confirm his WMD program, the existence of which is not an issue of argument as it was admitted to by him at that time. He kicked the inspectors out time and again. He fired on US and British planes which were enforcing the no-fly zone. I think there is plenty of evidence that he shipped his WMD to Syria; now we see that North Korea has apparently purchased a complete nuclear warhead from *somewhere*, and I wonder when someone might purchase something the wacky Iraqi himself cooked up. But, to be blunt, the program was in existance, we said prove to us that it is dismantled, and he didn't. For 12 years. And he did that .. why exactly?

      Link to al Qaeda - are you insane? Why do you think that? There are definate links to al Qaeda, including meetings in Europe between known al Qaeda bad boys and Hussein's bad boys. Were they having tea and crumpets (or more accurately, beer and strudel)? Imminent threat: I find this to be a silly argument anyways. If someone has spent 12 years obstructing all efforts to confirm he is not trying to cook up something with which to kill mass numbers of innocent people, I don't really think one should wait around till the bomb goes off before thinking 'imminent threat.' If a cop goes to arrest someone and the guy reaches for a gun, should the cop have to wait till it is in his hand before acting? The hammer back? The gun aimed? What is your standard of imminent threat? Silly.

      No, actually we're worse off, by simply repeating the mistakes of the past

      What mistakes of the past? Killing people who would do us harm? How is that bad? Or do you mean the mistakes committed by Clinton for 8 years, ignoring the threat of al Qaeda?

      We are a bigger target, with more attackers, than when we started.

      Which would explain, of course, why we have been attacked so many times since the start of... oh, wait... We haven't been, have we? Or are you using the silly argument, "Every bomb we drop creates another terrorist"? Seeing as how the assholes who carried out 9/11 were never victims of US action, most of whom Saudi subjects educated in the west, I find this argument to be one of the more ironic, funny ones coming from the barking moonbat arena.

      The current US administration is wildly out of bounds regarding the spirit of almost any law: human rights, foreign affairs, UN participation, separation of church and state, manipulation of the media, manipulation of national science opinions, and management of the environment.

      Which human rights are they violating? The right to commit or plan terrorist acts as an un-uniformed member of no army, then to claim bogus Geneva convention rights as a captured soldier? That kind of violation? Foreign affairs - what exactly are you referring to? The right of the US

      --

      The Democratic Party: We've been pussies since 1968!

    76. Re:You watch too much TV by mugnyte · · Score: 1

      You should have just gone to sleep. You are way too childly antagonistic to really debate.

    77. Re:You watch too much TV by nursedave · · Score: 1

      Seems like I took the wind out of your sails; nice response to my well thought out and executed el-smasho of your insipid argument. Typical liberal.

      --

      The Democratic Party: We've been pussies since 1968!

    78. Re:You watch too much TV by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      You are confusing Magnitude of the Catastrophe with Magnitude of the Attack. Within 1 hour, they knew the Magnitude of the Attack. How?

      Two things: #1 you know that communication network that was destroyed? Draw it on a map. Think about it. They knew it was done with a single attack, most probably a single bomb. The mere size of the communication blackout was enough of a warning.

      #2 People moved. While the devastation was large, a man on a horse could travel across it from one one to another and get to another place with a working phone. Trust me, they had a reasonable idea of the physical destruction that the first bomb had.

      Yes, it is true, they did not realize the magnitude - for example they had no idea about the radiation. But the Japanese military had a reasonable idea of the # of deaths and property destruction within 24 hours. They were not stupid, just arrogant.

      Was the untested bomb done for testing purposes? Possibly. But like many people you are confusing reasons for making a specific choice as the reason for making the general decision. If I decide to buy a red sports car instead of a Station Wagon because I think it will attract more women, that does NOT mean I am buying the car to attract women. I bought the car because I need a vehicle to get to work - if I was married, I still would have bought a car - just a different one.

      The decision to use a 2nd bomb was because Japan did not surrender after the first. The decision to use a different bomb instead of the same type was probably made for research reasons.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  38. Think for a second by Rii · · Score: 0

    So you're asking Chinese citizens that break the law to post how they do it? Not only does that put them at risk, but it makes it easier for the government to stop, depending on their method.

  39. A word of advice by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

    to the poster: You really think that asking that...here...will get you reasonable advice...that will still work in one year?

    to the answerers: You really think that responding will help anybody? This is one of the few cases where security through obscurity is a very good option.

    If you're still going to answer, make sure to Post Anonymously.

  40. Extremely bad idea to even try circumventing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No offence but really you should NOT be trying to break the law in China. Despite what you may think, the US consulate is not going to try to come to your rescue.

    China's pretty swift with punishment and you could either be rotting in prison for a very long time, or your family could be stuck with a 5 yuan bill for the bullet used in your execution.

    Probably the only way you could get around it is to NOT use the Chinese system for your internet. Which would mean something pretty drastic like a satellite phone if those even still work anymore.

  41. Best way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is to not move there for good. Visits are okay, but live there... no thanks. (yes, I've been to mainland China many times... it's a wonderful country and wonderful people, but a shitty government)

  42. Go in March... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Because as we all know:

    "Freedom is on the march".

    Har har har.

  43. more important sims 2 or your life/freedom ? by jnf · · Score: 1

    While I've never been to China and never directly experienced their security, I cannot speak on it. However I can speak a little about respecting other countries laws- and its not so much respecting it because you agree with it, but more respecting it because you will find yourself in a nice chinese prison if you don't. Simply put, while the US justice system has a lot of problems- its still a cake walk compared to many countries, things you may take for granted, i.e. right to a trial, right to an attorney, etc may not necessarily hold true in another country. In addition to that, its very american of us to goto other countries and expect the same standards. We do that a lot, but thats not really the point- overall I am just saying 'sure you could probably get around it, but we are also talking about a country with gross human rights violations so you must consider which is more important to you, sims 2 or your life'. Nevermind if you are religious or anything else.

  44. elgooG by marsu_k · · Score: 2, Informative

    I haven't tried this myself as I've never been in China, but I've heard that searches via elgooG would effectively bypass "the great firewall". Just a rumour for me though. Could anyone verify this?

  45. Why violate their culture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have a problem with Chinese policies and laws, moving there with the express intention of breaking them is probably not the best solution.

    Perhaps you should reconsider moving to Hong Kong, or Taiwan or some other place in Asia where you can get a similar cultural experience without having to go against the culture's laws, values and mores. While you may value freedom of foo above all else, it's culturalist and wrong to try to impose that on all others. What if Chinese immigrants to America held your same principles to heart, and tried to remake your society, through illegal and covert means, to resemble theirs? Would that sit well with you?

  46. Asking for it! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Interesting
    You're just looking to get yourself into trouble, aren't you. You know they have censorship there. You know people get arrested in crackdowns. Yet you want to go over there, while not playing by their rules. This is edging close to a Troll.

    Obviously some people break the rules, use outside proxies not yet blocked by the government, and get access to prohibited information. I've been there, three times. I know some of this. And I don't recommend it. If caught, and lucky, you'll just be thrown out of the country. It can be worse.

    The question you should be asking yourself is: Just how much do I want to have a long, happy, and enjoyable time living in the PRC?

    Why not try living like a real Chinese citizen for a few months just to see what it's like? Why else go, if you're only trying to live your Western-style life just in a new location?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  47. Celestial Kingdom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try Middle Kingdom you insensitive clod!

  48. Possible Solution by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Instead of moving to Mainland China, move to Taiwan?

  49. Thats it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...now /. is banned.

  50. I love self-solving problems... by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    If any Chinese citizens can post here to tell you how, then the Great Firewall isn't really a problem, is it?

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:I love self-solving problems... by bcattwoo · · Score: 1

      Maybe the poster is actually a Chinese official looking for holes in their set up? The first thing I thought when reading this was if someone did know a good way around the censorship, would posting it on the internet really be a smart thing to do?

  51. Yorkle! Yorkle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    You are dumb.

    <End pause>

    YORKLE!

  52. freedom gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Having lived there, well

    a) hope you know chinese

    b) public interenet, cds, etc. is OK, and there may be more there than is let on. Note: they banned this because it's already out.

    c) there are proxies that will let you circumvent, but they will know you did that. It's a moving target game.

    other notes
    - self censorship challenges; Americans (I'm one) are loud and boisterous. Like to challenge boundarys and assumptions. That's not their culture and frowned upon.

    Basically, it's going to be different, and depends entirely where you are in that vast ranging country.

  53. Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    ' Chinese's censorship a godsend given it's only imposed within its own country '

    It is also imposed outside of China's borders: upon Tibet.

    1. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Following your logic, this censorship isn't really countrywide because Taiwanese are still free to surf.

    2. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tibet is *within* China's borders.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tibet

    3. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like Puerto Rico, or Hawaii ain't part of the United States, right?

    4. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by BrainInAJar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tibet was conquered fair and square by China.

      Drawing that sort of analogy opens up the possibility of criticizing the states for continuing to hold on to the south, or the UK and Scotland, or Israel and the entire nation of Israel, et cetera.

    5. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      I take it you had a similar view of the Warsaw Pact?

    6. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by Kvorg · · Score: 1

      I don't want to draw any analogies, move borders or hold specific political grudges, but even as an offtopic, this deserves an answer: surely you can not possibly assume it is right to hold on to any country or region conquered by war? In what way is that different from robbing, thievery and other more moundain acts of violence for profit?

      And, incidentally, I see absolutely no excuse for leaders killing in war: people killed are just as dead in the end. It is an excuse for the soldiers in a battle - but never for the leaders who put them there.

      If you are unsure about any of that, try to imagine being in the skin of the soldier, the killed and the conquered. This is called empathy and is supposed to be a basic ability of sane human individuals. It's a good test many world leaders appear to fail on regular basis, but refuse to get hospitalised nevertheless.

      (Remember: it is called peace effort when we do it to others, but terrorism when they do it to us.)

      --
      -Kvorg
    7. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Tibet was conquered fair and square by China.

      "Fair and square"? So conquering is OK now? Does that mean it's OK if the USA conquers the rest of the middle east, whether they like it or not?

      Drawing that sort of analogy opens up the possibility of criticizing the states for continuing to hold on to the south, or the UK and Scotland, or Israel and the entire nation of Israel, et cetera.

      As far as I'm concerned, all these situations are open to criticism, especially if the inhabitants of those areas still don't want to be in that country. In fact, in my opinion, if a group of people occupying a certain region doesn't want to be governed by some other group of people in another region, they shouldn't have to be. Where did this idea that imperialism and conquering is OK come from anyway?

      If the people of the southeast US wants to secede, they should be allowed to. If the Kurds want their own country, then they should get it; their current and past leaders sure haven't been very good for them. If Tibet wants to be independent, they should be. Israel has been learning the hard way, for a long time, that the Palestinians don't want to be ruled by them. If the Scots are still pissed about Wallace getting killed and want independence, they should get it. The 13 colonies of Britain in the New World decided they wanted to rule themselves 229 years ago, and they fought for independence and got it. Why is everyone now against self-rule and all for imperialism? This absolutely sickens me.

    8. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by The_Spud · · Score: 2, Informative

      Scotland chose to join the union so that analogy doesn't really hold up. (Treaty of Northhampton 1329) Also we had a referendum on independance in 1979 and the majority voted against it. (33% for) If the Scots are still pissed about Wallace getting killed and want independence, they should get it. Probably shouldn't use Mel Gibson films as a source for historical reference. :->

    9. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by glesga_kiss · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Fair and square"? So conquering is OK now? Does that mean it's OK if the USA conquers the rest of the middle east, whether they like it or not?

      No, it's not OK now. The world is a patchwork of territories, with every one of the major players having claims all over. When the western world became "civilized" (debatable), the territories were left as-is. The Brits have the Falkland Islands, the US has Pear Harbour and Guantanamo Bay (another wierd one) and so on.

      Democracy in it's current incarnation is a farce. Do you really believe that if the residents of a country wanted independance they'd get it? Bear in mind I'm sitting in Scotland here, where a large percentage of the population wants it, but there ain't gonna be a vote on it. Over the water from me, Northern Ireland has been contested over by terrorist groups (funded from the US ironically) for decades, and it's not worked for them. On the other hand, we have Yugoslavia, where a bloody civil war got nations their independance.

      The only peacefull change that springs to mind was the UK's hand-over to China recently. The whole independance giving (which China ain't!) thing isn't all that popular.

      Tibet has been a part of China for hundreds, if not thousands of years. It's status only came into question in the last fifty, thanks to the involvement of the CIA, during the cold war. Remember that? Lot's other places were contested over.

      The fact is that I don't have a clue about whether the Tibetans want independance. But I'm not going to blindly believe the usual anti-communist crap that the US has been spilling for years.

    10. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      Imperialism and unity result in stability, and thus survival for the great fraction of humanity. That's what makes it OK. Rule of law, the only competing system, has been demonstrated only to work when enforced by violence, i.e. conquering and imperialism. In all honesty, your blatant disregard for the realities of human nature disturbs me just as much as the lack of ability for everyone to start their own sovereign nation apparrently disturbs you. Seriously... when did social freedom come to outweigh cultural and genetic survival? Ick.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    11. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      OK, forget Scotland. There's still Ireland, various republics such as Khazakstan that were part of the Soviet Union, the Czech Republic vs. Slovakia, etc. These all were successful in achieving independence, but there's other places that haven't been. If the people want it, they should get it.

    12. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by QMO · · Score: 1

      I agree that expansion by conquest is a "Bad Thing" and shouldn't be done.
      However, who should give back the territory they conquered?
      I am a US citizen, with light skin. Does that mean that I have to leave the current boundaries of the US and go back to where my ancestors vcame from? Very difficult. I was born in Japan. My father and his parents were born in Mexico. Some of my ancestors signed the documents that made the US a nation. Others of my ancestors were still in Denmark 3 generations ago.
      Who the ground belongs to gets awfully fuzzy awfully quickly.
      Who gets Egypt? There have been how many conquerings and empires there?

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    13. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, it's not OK now. The world is a patchwork of territories, with every one of the major players having claims all over. When the western world became "civilized" (debatable), the territories were left as-is. The Brits have the Falkland Islands, the US has Pear Harbour and Guantanamo Bay (another wierd one) and so on.

      I'm not really worried as much about military bases as I am about whole countries of people being forced to live under a government they don't support. No one actually lives in Guantanamo Bay except for some prisoners. Pearl Harbor is part of Hawaii, which IIRC voted to join the USA.

      Democracy in it's current incarnation is a farce. Do you really believe that if the residents of a country wanted independance they'd get it?

      I'm not saying it's guaranteed, but it's a lot easier in a democracy than other regimes. My whole argument was that if they want independence, they should be granted it; anyone who acts otherwise is immoral, as the USA and Turkey are doing with regards to the Kurds.

      Bear in mind I'm sitting in Scotland here, where a large percentage of the population wants it, but there ain't gonna be a vote on it.

      Excuse me? I'm just an ignorant American, but another poster just replied to this same message saying Scotland willingly joined the union, and that they even had a referendum in the 1970's for independence, and it failed, getting only 33% approval. While I'm all for independence for regions that want it, that doesn't apply if it's just a minority.

      On the other hand, we have Yugoslavia, where a bloody civil war got nations their independance.

      Unfortunately, that seems to be the usual way to achieve independence. It shouldn't be that way, and countries that have fought for independence should better appreciate what they have, and support other peoples who want the same thing, instead of oppressing them.

      Tibet has been a part of China for hundreds, if not thousands of years.

      Last time I checked, Tibet only became part of China after the communists took over in 1949. Before that, they were self-governing. Mexico is part of North America geographically, but they were never ruled by the USA.

      The fact is that I don't have a clue about whether the Tibetans want independance. But I'm not going to blindly believe the usual anti-communist crap that the US has been spilling for years.

      I don't think anyone knows what modern-day Tibetans want, but I don't think Tibetans in 1949 wanted to be part of China, or else China would not have had to take the country by force. That's like thinking the woman really wants it when she's screaming "no! stop!".

    14. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by belmolis · · Score: 1, Informative
      Tibet has been a part of China for hundreds, if not thousands of years. It's status only came into question in the last fifty, thanks to the involvement of the CIA, during the cold war.

      This is utter nonsense. Tibet has been independent of China for most of its history. Imperial China claimed sovereignty over every state with which it had diplomatic relations, on the theory that the Emperor could only enter into the relationship of master to vassal, including Japan, Okinawa (an independant country until 1609), Korea, and Vietnam. China has long claimed sovereignty over Tibet, but Tibet was de facto an independent state and did not acknowledge Chinese sovereignty.

      As a matter of international law, the critical fact is that in 1951, at the time of the Chinese invasion, Tibet was an independant state. It had a distinctive population occupying a well-defined territory under the effective control of its own government. The government of Tibet issued coins and currency and passports that were internationally recognized. It entered into diplomatic relations as a sovereign nation with other countries, including Nepal,Mongolia, Great Britain, and Ladakh. In fact, The Republic of China negotiated with Tibet as a sovereign nation at the Simla Conference in 1913-1914.

    15. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You're sick. You're equating military aggression to enforcement of laws by police. You need to get your head checked.

    16. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      if a group of people occupying a certain region doesn't want to be governed by some other group of people in another region, they shouldn't have to be.

      That statement isn't protesting military agression, it's protesting centralized government, i.e. enforcement by police. Get your own head checked.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    17. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      troll, or american zero goal high school education

    18. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by peawee03 · · Score: 1
      earl Harbor is part of Hawaii, which IIRC voted to join the USA.

      Hawaii was once a monarchy. US plantation owners came there, set up farms. US plantation owners overthrew the monarchy already in place there, set up their own "republic", and petitioned Congress for annexation. Not one native Hawaiian (sp?) voted on the matter.

      --
      I wish I could write clever and witty sigs.
    19. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by Kosi · · Score: 1

      Tibet was conquered fair and square by China.

      Please explain to me the fairness in raiding other people, stealing their whole country and suppressing them even more than the own population.

      And that sort of analogy is the same as critizising Iraq for invading Kuwait or Israel for stealing land from Egypt and Jordan.

    20. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You're a moron. You promoted "imperialism", which basically means forcibly taking territory and exerting power through military aggression.

      I never protested centralized government; I only protested government exerted by one group of people in a geographic region, over another group of people in a different region, which is not consented to by the first group that is being governed.

    21. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by adrained · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tibet has been a part of China for hundreds, if not thousands of years. It's status only came into question in the last fifty, thanks to the involvement of the CIA, during the cold war.

      Tibet has been part of China before, it is true -- but not for thousands of years, and primarily (until recently) when China has been ruled by a foreign dynasty (the yuan and qing dynasties respectively). But it has been independent many times for longer (before Buddhism came to rule in Tibet they were considered a fierce enemy). So you could say its status has always been in question.

      Not sure where the CIA comes into it. I don't doubt that they would have wanted contention in the area - but I believe the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan community in Nepal were contesting Chinese control after they invaded in 1959 quite outside of the CIA's involvement.

      --
      drain
    22. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No one is saying we need to analyze all of human history and correct all the wrongs done in centuries past. If everyone in a conquered region who still cares about it is dead and gone, it's not going to help any.

      What I advocate is the idea that countries should not, from this point forward, conquer other nations by force in order to extend imperial power, and in regions where people are living under rule they do not wish to live under, they should be allowed to secede and form their own country, assuming a majority of the people in that region agree to this. This has nothing whatsoever to do with where your ancestors came from, only where people are living now.

      So, for example, if a vote is taken and 80% of the people in Hawaii decide they want to secede from the USA, then they should be allowed to. This applies to all current residents, not just those whose ancestors came from there, or who have at least X% of "pure" blood, or anything like that. You can't undo the past, but that doesn't mean you can't stop immoral behaviors in the present.

      Honestly, this is really simple, and I have no idea why so many people can't grasp it. Do people really think it's ok to force people to live under tyranny?

    23. Re:Chinese censorship imposed beyond China by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      And that sort of analogy is the same as critizising Iraq for invading Kuwait or Israel for stealing land from Egypt and Jordan.

      In defense of Israel, they were attacked by those countries, and during the short war for their survival, they seized those territories. It's not like they just decided one day to go take some land from their peaceful neighbors. Now whether they should have given that land back sooner, etc., is still a matter of debate.

      But yeah, Iraq invading Kuwait is absolutely no different from China invading Tibet. But somehow the former was obviously wrong, while the latter is now ok because we might offend some conquerors if we criticize it.

  54. What !?!?! by ChiGodOfKarma · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am concerned for your safet. I wouldn't recommend circumventing anything. When you live in a PoliceState (Communist or Fascist) a Western style prank like hacking will land you in prison for life. They will lock you in a room and throw away the room. If you want to read the news I recommend you move to a place with even a small bill of rights.

    1. Re:What !?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or when you live in a country where anything can be tagged as terrorism, and makes you suddenly vanish.

    2. Re:What !?!?! by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 1

      They will lock you in a room and throw away the room.

      An impressive feat. I can imagine the Great Pile of Discarded Rooms from here.

  55. How can you ask, and still be planning to go? by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    what are the things that those of you in the Celestial Kingdom know you cannot access, and specifically, what are the websites, search engines, news sites, and other sites that are classed as potentially 'dangerous' material?

    If you even have to ask these questions, you're hopelessly naive, and will be eaten alive by the place to which you're headed. What, did you think that all that scary talk about being arrested and jailed for your opinions (or for even visiting web sites where you can read someone else's opinions) was just Republicans trying to make socialists look bad? It's real!

    I'd be astounded if there's a single "legal" reader of this web site in China at all. Now, while it still lasts, you might consider moving to Taiwan.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:How can you ask, and still be planning to go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What, did you think that all that scary talk about being arrested and jailed for your opinions (or for even visiting web sites where you can read someone else's opinions) was just Republicans trying to make socialists look bad? It's real!

      Um, I wasn't aware that Republicans were the only ones making the scary talk about China. In fact, it appears they could care less about what goes on in China, as long as China pays up.

      Also, BTW, Communism is not Socialism.

    2. Re:How can you ask, and still be planning to go? by CurlyG · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you even have to ask these questions, you're hopelessly naive,...

      I can hardly believe I'm responding to the flood of xenophobic ignorance in this thread, but I have a number of close friends who have spent considerable amounts of time living and travelling through various parts of China, and the ones being naive are you and everyone else here with the exception of the OP and the guy a few comments up who pointed out the the Chinese government are largely not interested in what you, a Westerner, are doing on the internet. The Great Firewall is there to monitor and control Chinese citizens.

      All this hysterical bleating about being dragged off for re-education is just absolute nonsense. The Chinese government most definately is not interested in unnecessarily pissing off Western governments right at the moment (they're even holding the next Olympics there for god's sake).

      Now, if you're a Chinese citizen then this is all a very different kettle of fish altogether, but if you're a Westerner, just take along a floppy disk with PuTTY on it, ssh into a friend's box in the US, and tunnel HTTP over the connection. Simple and unmonitorable.

      --
      You know they call 'em fingers but I've never seen 'em fing. Oh, there they go.
    3. Re:How can you ask, and still be planning to go? by Tonytheloony · · Score: 1

      I'm just curious, but have you lived in China? You sure seem to know a lot about the country.
      Having personally lived in a "less free" country (than the US), I can tell you that foreigners usually don't live by the same rules as the locals.
      Moreover many foreigners in China have illegal satellite dishes (including my dad's boss) and it's no big deal.

      --
      The quickest way to become an atheist is to study the Bible thoroughly.
    4. Re:How can you ask, and still be planning to go? by Feyr · · Score: 2, Funny

      considering slashdot is blocked by their great firewall, there sure isn't ANY "legal" readers from china

    5. Re:How can you ask, and still be planning to go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Also, BTW, Communism is not Socialism.

      Its almost Socialism, but not quite as bad.

      Socialism is an "ideal" pit of misery which mankind can never truly achieve.

    6. Re:How can you ask, and still be planning to go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in China and i'm "legal" hehehe
      well consider HongKong if that suits your situation.

    7. Re:How can you ask, and still be planning to go? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      did you think that all that scary talk about being arrested and jailed for your opinions (or for even visiting web sites where you can read someone else's opinions) was just Republicans trying to make socialists look bad?

      Where have you been? China isn't socialist, it`s fascist, true fascism as envisioned by Benito Mussolini when he said, "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power."

      Consquently, the republicans in this country absolutely LUV China today. At least the ones who have abondoned their principles of democracy and freedom in favor of Big Business which seems to be most of the lot.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    8. Re:How can you ask, and still be planning to go? by toby · · Score: 1
      all that scary talk about being arrested and jailed for your opinions (or for even visiting web sites where you can read someone else's opinions) was just Republicans trying to make socialists look bad
      Ah no, that "scary talk" you heard was progressives trying to make conservative Republicans look like the ignorant hypocrites they are: for slowly converting a society that, by some great irony, still considers itself "freer" than anyone else, into a totalitarian state, by stealth and deception.
      --
      you had me at #!
    9. Re:How can you ask, and still be planning to go? by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      the Chinese government are largely not interested in what you, a Westerner, are doing on the internet. The Great Firewall is there to monitor and control Chinese citizens.

      Yeah, people are overreacting, but there is the fact that the guy is going to live there. Could that possibly put him in a gray area even if he maintains Western citizenship? It's a fair question to at least ask.

      Personally, I'd like to know what's motivating his move to China. I assume a job.

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    10. Re:How can you ask, and still be planning to go? by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Now, if you're a Chinese citizen then this is all a very different kettle of fish altogether, but if you're a Westerner, just take along a floppy disk with PuTTY on it, ssh into a friend's box in the US, and tunnel HTTP over the connection. Simple and unmonitorable.

      Yes, and step back and watch the fun as the Chinese citizen who subscribes to that internet connection has to explain that to the authorities.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    11. Re:How can you ask, and still be planning to go? by ummit · · Score: 1
      ...just take along a floppy disk with PuTTY on it, ssh into a friend's box in the US...

      If I were setting up that "Great Firewall", one of the very first things I would do is block port 22. Simple. Are you suggesting they haven't done this?

    12. Re:How can you ask, and still be planning to go? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      xenophobic ignorance

      Don't confuse condemnation of the Chinese government's oppressive policies with any sort of discomfort for people from China. Xenophobes are afraid of people that are different. I'm more concerned about governments that don't want to allow information about being different, and have a track record of locking people up for seeking or disseminating just that.

      The Chinese government most definately is not interested in unnecessarily pissing off Western governments

      But they're incredibly tone deaf on this issue! They may be easing off on silly arrests of professors doing research (research? he must be a spy!), they don't seem to get that people in the Western world (who buy all of their stuff, thank you very much) are truly disturbed by the limits the Chinese government puts on personal expression and the consumption of information. That just pass the liberty smell test, and there's a reason so many people are outraged that the Olympics will be held there. That being said, I hope that all of the media scrutiny accompanying the games will actually force that government's hand into a looser posture on information in general. It's decades overdue.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    13. Re:How can you ask, and still be planning to go? by handslikesnakes · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's a real pity that you can't change the port sshd runs on.

    14. Re:How can you ask, and still be planning to go? by e+r+i+k+0 · · Score: 1

      It's not, sorry. When I was there about six months ago, I had absolutely no problem reading /. from Beijing.

    15. Re:How can you ask, and still be planning to go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you have to do then is tunnel port 22 over port 80!

    16. Re:How can you ask, and still be planning to go? by 808140 · · Score: 1

      Nor do I. Right now. (I'm in Shanghai).

  56. Another way to avoid censorship: by Megaweapon · · Score: 1

    Stay off Michael Sims' shitlist.

    --
    I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
  57. you can get around it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Circumventing the limitations will lead to you being deported as soon as possible.

    That is if you are caught.

    I myself have been avoiding detection for many years. The best way to access the outside is by connecting to oiu2513sf

  58. Beware of the Peoples BSOD by GatesGhost · · Score: 5, Funny

    and dont use the people's explorer of internet. But i hear the chinese food there rocks (or as they call it there, 'food')

  59. Censorship.....Bah! by fenix99 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I recently spent the better part of a year living in Guangzhou followed by a few months in Chengdu. As for Porn, it was being sold on the streets. I found there to be no real enforcing of any of these "bans" the central government keeps talking about. The conry is actually very free on a day to day basis, as long as you don't bring religion or something similar into a School you're teaching at, you're ok

    1. Re:Censorship.....Bah! by diamondsw · · Score: 1

      Sounds similar to the US, except for that bit about porn in the streets. We could use that here.

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    2. Re:Censorship.....Bah! by Riddlefox · · Score: 1

      You've never been to Las Vegas then, I take it?

    3. Re:Censorship.....Bah! by eformo · · Score: 4, Informative
      I lived in Beijing between August 2000 and July 2002. Because Beijing was competing for the position as 2008 Olympic host city, things like the porn were being cleaned up. This also meant that people without urban residence permits were regularly shipped back to the countryside (I hate it when the person I buy breakfast from gets kicked out of the city. Ruins the whole day.) Government intervention in daily life seemed rare, though draconian when it popped up. (They shut off heat for about a million people just to clear the skies up for the IOC)

      Regarding the internet, some friends and I made use of a commercial product with an encrypted IP tunnel past the Great Firewall. As a result, I never suffered any problems regarding online censorship. The only time I noticed things really being censored(other than the propaganda machine that is the Chinese press), was immediately after the attacks on 9-11 when the TV news channel that I was watching got shut down.

      Parent's got it right, as long as you give them no reason to bother you, they will spend their time bothering someone else.

      -ex

    4. Re:Censorship.....Bah! by JaxWeb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For my personal interest, could you expand on your comment.

      Especially "...was immediately after the attacks on 9-11 when the TV news channel that I was watching got shut down."

      --
      - Jax
    5. Re:Censorship.....Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate it when the person I buy breakfast from gets kicked out of the city. Ruins the whole day.

      Yeah, it must not be easy to go on after such hardships...

      Must be nice living in a world where you are the only thing that matters, and you missing a breakfast is more important than some person's life being turned upside down because they are kicked out of the city.

  60. In this case, they shouldn't by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When you're in a foreign country, you're obliged to obey their rules. Accidentally violating some custom/rule and winding up in jail is one thing, but when you go to a country and violate their laws willfully and with premeditation there is no reason at all why the US should expend its diplomatic resources saving your sorry ass.

    If you don't like their rules, don't move there.

    1. Re:In this case, they shouldn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As we all know, only the guilty are arrested.

    2. Re:In this case, they shouldn't by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      In this case he would most certainly be guilty

    3. Re:In this case, they shouldn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh in this case I agree, but many think even if they are guilty the US is gonna come flying in with diplomats and save them. Not gonna happen.

  61. Sort of off-topic by mollog · · Score: 1

    I regard the government of China as being in a situation like Iraq and Afganistan; democracy won't work there. So, 'freedom of speech' is not a viable concept. The Chinese have to be careful about what they allow or chaos will result. Example, they were on a path to overpopulation until their government imposed some rules. I'm sure this will start a bitter debate, but I think the Chinese should not be interfered with, especially not the way we destabilized Iraq.

    --
    Best regards.
    1. Re:Sort of off-topic by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      a bit early to tell if democracy will work in those places or not. You think there are more people dying per day in Iraq than under Saddam, or that the religious factions in afganistan never fought until now? You think more U.S. solders died in Iraq than in other places we've fought the last 100 years? It took the U.S.A. over a hundred years and more than a million casualties from 1770's to 1870 to even begin to move in the direction of having a free country, with another 100 years to get to basic civil rights recognized. Now 1,000 U.S. soldiers die, and dozens of suicide bomber deaths a week, and you're whining already?

    2. Re:Sort of off-topic by mollog · · Score: 1

      I hear what you're saying, but not all democracies had a violent beginning. And if we're so big on democracy, why is Saudi Arabia not democratic?

      --
      Best regards.
    3. Re:Sort of off-topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is already a democracy. This is a different flavor called the one party democracy.

    4. Re:Sort of off-topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? Democracy was supposed to be applied only to small population centers, where mostly everyone could talk and each other were sitting face to face.

      Check its current state. An illusion of freedom, where corporations effectively rule the destiny of the people.

  62. Falun Gong by ponds · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just be sure to talk about Falun Gong wherever you go in China, and they'll love you.

    1. Re:Falun Gong by michaelbuddy · · Score: 1

      Falun Gong practitioners not only don't have freedom of religion, they are murdered in huge numbers, taken into rehab hospitals, drugged until their brains are so toxic they forget who they are. I don't support China's government, so anything you can do while you live there for the good of humanity, I say do it, spread democracy the peaceful way.

      --

      ...::----::...

      I am in no way affiliated with this sig.

  63. Adios Amigo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you really want to try and circumvent their firewalls, Good Luck. Remember you would be in their country and from what I read, their record on rights is not the best. But, its okay, I'm pretty sure nobody would recognize any of your organs when they show up on the black market for surgeries.

    1. Re:Adios Amigo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet. After all nobody is complaining about the ones coming back from Iraq.

  64. can we mark this ask slashdot as TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Wow, this has got to be the worst ask slashdot question ever. First we make cracks at the US government for no real reason other then to do so, then you go on to talk about wanting to move to china.

    Come on lets get real and discuss the news and something we can do something about and know about. Normally ask slashdots are interesting, this just has troll spelled all over it.

    Phil

  65. tunnel by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    a basic freebsd jailed server or UML server for $20 /month, log into text mode brower via ssh, assuming your using very slow connection. For broadband, could even run remote X11 brower via ssh -X

  66. Just Like That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    "If USA can attack another country "Just Like That"(tm), "

    If this "other country" launches hundreds of unprovoked attacks against your peacekeepers (as Iraq did against UK and US) over several years, refusing to stop, then retaliating against it after a long period of warning is not "just like that".

    1. Re:Just Like That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah... I 'your peacekeepers'

      telling...

    2. Re:Just Like That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Do I have to remind you all those evil chemical things were sold by the US, and used to mass murder kurds with whatsoever no reaction? That it was reported to the UN Security Council, but got "edited out" of the report (8000 pages of cut-n-paste-apparently-nowhere missing).Or the mass corruption relating to the oil for food program?

      Stay at your FUCKEN home!

    3. Re:Just Like That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this "other country" is said to possess hundreds of unproven WMD, after a long period of speculation, it is not "just like that" anymore.

    4. Re:Just Like That? by AndyL · · Score: 1

      "Unprovoked" attacks against "peacekeepers"?

      How does that work, exactly?

    5. Re:Just Like That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And which evil chemical things would that be, then?

      You talk tough, but I bet you have no idea what you're talking about.

      Welcome to the Internet, where intimidation is harder to achieve.

    6. Re:Just Like That? by Machine9 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm gonna go out on a limb and state that they are very subjective terms, and the the people launching these "unprovoked attacks" felt rather WWII resistance fighters striking at an occupational force.

      Truth, oddly enough, is also in the eye of the beholder.

    7. Re:Just Like That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WMDs that were never found and in fact no evidence pointing to WMDs was found. I guess we just attacked Iraq because those responsible for 9/11 were in Afganistan. Makes as much sense as many GWB policies.

    8. Re:Just Like That? by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1

      Parent is referring to the air patrols of the no-fly zones in the period following Gulf War I. As everybody remembers, the Iraqis occasionally launched ineffectual (unguided) SAM and AAA attacks against the plane in a one-sided game of tit-for-tat. The Americans and British invariably responded to the attacks by bombing the offending antiaircraft sites. But it is really not correct to call armed warplanes enforcing a blockade, "peacekeepers."

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    9. Re:Just Like That? by Rei · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Huh? What peacekeepers? Don't tell me that you're trying to claim that the "no fly zone" (a US/British construct; the rest of the SC declared them illegal) enforcing craft were peacekeepers. Do you even know what a peacekeeper is?

      I can just imagine (reverse situation) someone French nationalist getting furious at the US for trying to shoot down all French military craft flying over every state from Georgia southward and New York northward across the whole width of the country, after those French craft had been attacking the US military almost nonstop without international blessing. And if that French nationalist called their jets "peacekeepers"? You probably wouldn't know whether to laugh or shake your head in disgust.

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
    10. Re:Just Like That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do I have to remind you that 95% (or more) of Iraq's chemical, biological, and convertional weapons were purchased from France, Germany, and Russia?

      Get your fucking facts straight!

    11. Re:Just Like That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Fucken" isn't a word.

    12. Re:Just Like That? by kd5ujz · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, from 1984-89, several U.S. Companies and the CDC, with the approval of the U.S. Department of Commerce, sold several chemicals to Iraq, who at the time, was at war with Iran. Here is a short list of goodies we sold them.

      Bacillus Anthracis
      Clostridium Botulinum
      Histoplasma Capsulatam
      Brucella Melitensis
      Clostridium Perfringens
      Clostridium tetani
      Escherichia coli

      This was confirmed By CDC records, Senate Banking Commision records, and U.N. weapons inspectors.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    13. Re:Just Like That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      true, but the point remains. If this "other country" is said to possess... It's not "Just like that". "Just like that" implies no provocation. That is simply false. There was provocation and only a complete idiot would dispute that. Now you can argue that the provocation was insufficient to warrant an invasion, but claiming the provocation didn't exist is just infantile.

    14. Re:Just Like That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      after those French craft had been attacking the US military almost nonstop without international blessing

      You're mixing up your events. The no-fly zone resulted from the First Gulf War. That war definately had international blessing. The Second Gulf war had international blessing only from some nations, and lacked it from most. It also lacked explicit security council approval.

      Keep your facts straight please.

    15. Re:Just Like That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Do you know what a peacekeeper is? duh... It's the word we use for "soldier we like". In other words, it's a variation on "yay for our side".

    16. Re:Just Like That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those aren't chemicals, fucktard... They're BACTERIA.

    17. Re:Just Like That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I guess everyone in the whole world except GWB's followers is a complete idiot then.

      Sometimes an asshole is just an asshole and not someone who is misunderstood in his good intentions.

    18. Re:Just Like That? by Rei · · Score: 1

      > That war definately had international blessing ... but the no-fly zones did *not*. Don't you tell me to keep my facts straight when you don't even know the difference between the no-fly zones and the internationally backed war that spawned them.

      In the beginning, Iraq immediately rejected the zones (according to Tariq Aziz in 1993, "Iraq does not recognize the no-fly zone because it was not a UN job"). The US intiially tried to win support for the NFZs in the SC, but it eventually gave up, as there was too much opposition. The opposition increased; in the late 90s, France dropped out of helping enforce the NFZs, and later joined the opposition. China refused to endorse them; Russia became a vocal opponent of them, and later moved toward trying to get them stopped ("Air bombing of Iraqi targets by U.S. and British air forces is a breach of international law and UN resolutions" - Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov, '00).

      There is no UN resolution calling for the NFZs. The US attempted to justify the northern zone based on an earlier resolution calling for the protection of the Kurdish north (but which did not authorize force). They never attempted to justify the southern zone, to the best of my knowlege.

      To quote the executive vice president of the National Lawyers Guild (Marjorie Cohn), "The no-fly zones have never been specifically authorized by the UN Security Council. They are illegal violations of Iraqi sovereignty. The UN Charter is very clear. Only the Security Council can decide what measures can be taken to enforce Security Council resolutions."

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
    19. Re:Just Like That? by drooling-dog · · Score: 1
      If this "other country" is said to possess...

      Exactly.

    20. Re:Just Like That? by magarity · · Score: 1

      all French military craft flying over every state from Georgia southward and New York northward across the whole width of the country, after those French craft had been attacking the US military

      Wow, the very idea is the funniest thing I've read on /. in weeks; thanks for the laughs!

    21. Re:Just Like That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      no no.. it's just you.

      Sensible opponents of the war don't say that there was no provocation, they say that the provocation wasn't sufficient to justify invasion. Making demonstrably false generalizations just makes you look ignorant.

      Iraq shot at American planes. That is a provocation. Enough to justify the second gulf war given the context? That's the question. The United States has unfair trade practices with respect to softwood lumber. Provocation? Of course. Sufficient to declare war. I'd say not. British news journalists encourage readers to interfere in the US election. Provocation? Some might see it that way.

      I'm overstating it to make my point, but somehow it seemed necessary.

      If you think that Sadaam never provoked the US, you're a fool.

    22. Re:Just Like That? by issachar · · Score: 1
      Well I'll assume for the moment that you're 100% right about the SC resolutions & all that. You probably are after all.

      But have you noticed that this post contradicts your previous post?

      You originally suggested that it was just a US/British thing with everyone else in opposition. But the French were flying the NFZ's at one point?

      Additionally... You stated (a US/British construct; the rest of the SC declared them illegal) Your second post makes some good points but I see nothing about the "rest of the security council attempting to get the NFZ's declared "illegal". Just Russian statements to that effect. Not the same thing. I suspect you've overstated your case.

      And who cares if Iraq didn't like the NFZ's post-GulfWar1? They were the losing aggressors in a UN sanctioned war.

      --
      . --- If you're looking for free e-mail you won't find it here! http://www.noemailhere.com
    23. Re:Just Like That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the chemical symbol for E-Coli? lol. Whadda dumbass.

    24. Re:Just Like That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And whoever originally wrote that list is not aware of the binomial naming system:

      Clostridium Botulinum should be Clostridium botulinum, for example.

    25. Re:Just Like That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But did we provoke him first? We were flying overhead (against UN SC regulations), and attacking him and his stuff.

      So who provoked who?

      After being invaded I might shoot at my invaders as well if they were no longer in posession of any more authority than the fact that they have planes and bombs.

      (different AC)

    26. Re:Just Like That? by Rei · · Score: 1

      > But the French were flying the NFZ's at one point?

      The French both *are* in opposition (present tense), and had taken part in enforcement (past tense). Perhaps this will clear things up for you:

      http://english.people.com.cn/english/200102/18/e ng 20010218_62670.html

      "Iraq asked for the "dialogue" with Secrates, Britain and France established the no-fly zones after the 1991 Gulf War to protect Shiite Muslims in southern Iraq and Kurds in the north from Saddam Hussein's forces. They cited U.N. resolutions calling for protection of minorities in Iraq.

      In 1998, U.N. weapons inspections ground to a halt, and the United States and Britain launched a four-day air strike campaign to punish Baghdad for failing to cooperate with U.N. arms experts seeking to make sure Iraq has destroyed its weapons of mass destruction.

      France stopped actively patrolling the no-fly zones that year and has since increased its criticism of the air raids, calling them "pointless and deadly." "

      > Rest of the security council attempting to get the NFZ's declared "illegal"

      That was probably an overly broad statement. Russia, certainly, has referred to them as illegal on many occasions when speaking at the SC, but never introduced any resolutions that I am aware of. The same situation applies to China. France had taken Kofi Annan's assessment - that they were military action against another nation outside UN auspices, and that they were harmful to international peace.

      During the runup to the war, they were especially harsh with their criticism, and called for their end, but again, didn't introduce a resolution:

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/705736.st m

      Of course, the US didn't try and get a force-authorizing resolution the second time, either. You don't introduce bills that you don't think will pass unless you want to see the bill fail.

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
    27. Re:Just Like That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's "E-Coli"? Do you perchance mean E. coli?

      Let me guess, you write "T-Rex" too. You silly H-Sapiens you.

    28. Re:Just Like That? by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

      GYAAAAAAA NOT THIS AGAIN!!!

      Some bits of fud just NEVER DIE -- NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES THEY ARE REFUTED.

      For the 10,000,000 time:

      1. The US did indeed supply Iraq with Anthrax bacillum, among other things. At the time, the stuff was available to *any* government from the CDC. The intent was to help governments develop immunization programs, not infect their own people.

      2. Iraq didn't need America's help to develop chemical weapons like nerve gas or mustard gas. That stuff is easily synthesized by any government with even a moderate level of resources.

      3. Iraq did purchase U.S. helicopters that apparently were used to gas Kurds. However, now you're really getting into the minutiae of what can and can't be considered "military" assistance.

      Can't we please give this stuff a merciful death?

      - Alaska Jack

    29. Re:Just Like That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a biologist I recognize most of these as being commonly used tools in any micro-or-molecular-biology lab. With the exception of anthrax, these are commonly found things on any college campus. Any one of these organisms could be picked up in any major sewer system. If i wanted to I could probably culture anthrax by digging around in the dirt for a few hours. None of these (yes, even anthrax) is considered particularly dangerous disease-wise like smallpox or ebola would be.

      Seriously, including E. coli on a list of supposedly dangerous substances is somewhat odd. Considering that every living human has E. coli living in their intestines.

    30. Re:Just Like That? by kir · · Score: 1

      Nations do not need UNSC approval to wage war.

      --
      3cx.org - A truly bad website.
    31. Re:Just Like That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations, none of those are chemicals.

      Next.

    32. Re:Just Like That? by tabrnaker · · Score: 1

      um, they shot at planes that were flying where they weren't supposed to be. And those planes were dropping bombs.

  67. Freedom of religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the US, it's rare for Christians to be beaten or imprisoned for reading the Bible, gathering in fellowship, singing worhsip songs, giving sermons, or sharing their faith.

    1. Re:Freedom of religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea!! It's never too late to start!!

    2. Re:Freedom of religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, it's rare for Christians to be beaten or imprisoned for reading the Bible, gathering in fellowship, singing worhsip songs, giving sermons, or sharing their faith.

      Pity.

    3. Re:Freedom of religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad. It would be a start at helping rid society of mentally imbalanced individuals and their offspring they brainwash from birth.

  68. Here's the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like most Chinese nowadays... get a job... China's high tech sector booming. A lot of Chinese high tech workers have left Ottawa, Canada after Nortel started their layoffs. Why stay in a country that doesn't have any jobs that suits your education?

    1. Re:Here's the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep... because moving thousands of miles away everytime jobs dry up is way easier.... you portable COG you...

  69. This is a sting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Nice try Mao, but you won't get us to reveal what dangerous websites we use so you can shut them down.

    Better luch next time

  70. "Is the censorship that real?" by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 1
    Why not ask the Falun Gong, or the Tianaman Square protestors?

    You know the saying "you can't fix a social problem with technological means"? Well, a government convinced that it deserves to survive by any means necessary, including censoring its citizens (and that's if they're lucky), might be the best example of a social problem. You don't fix that with anonymous proxies and l33t pr0n-over-ssl.

    I'm not denying the importance of free speech, either in the absolute sense or as something important to bringing about the downfall of dictatorships; I'm saying that your assumptions about the utility of "getting around" the firewall are so very, very wrong. What good will your laptop do you when your door is kicked in at 3am by the police? Or when you're hauled before a judge, charged with crimes against the state, because you were looking at a non-approved news site? Why do you think that when They've got guns and police and armies and courts who will do what They want, that it's not that big a deal?

    1. Re:"Is the censorship that real?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. If the Guantanamo guards had been in the tanks, and the protesters were family of the prisioners, its obvious how fast thed'd hit the gas.

  71. Let's look at it from a different POV... by 8282now · · Score: 1

    You asked:
    "... This brings me to my overall question: is the censorship that real, that hard to get around, and how do you do it? What methods and technologies are you aware of or use to circumvent the Great Firewall of China?

    So you're asking effectively how we would go about breaking the laws in China?

    ... Uhmm... Do YOU have any affiliation with the Chinese government? A spy perhaps? A bad one at that ;)

  72. I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm actually reading your post from China right now, and I'm not entirely sure what you're asking:

    Do you really want to ... play ... a game. Are you a big fan of ... the ... general? Are you a big fan of ... Chinese? Do you like ... your legs?

    I would highly recommend ... going to China. Their jails are ... nice.

  73. I'm ... by KSobby · · Score: 0

    moving to the UK. Anyone know where I can go to make fun of the Queen and scream "Beckham sucks!" at the top of my lungs? Oh, wait, that's Ireland. My, err, bad. Umm ... yeah ... LOOK A CHICKEN!

    --
    "It's difficult to meditate on amphetamines." - Joe Walsh
  74. Bad Idea by Aeron65432 · · Score: 0

    It's been said many times, but the idea of trying to break the law in a strict state is a bad idea. Would you go to Tehran to give out Bibles? Watch a video of Tiananmen Square. You'll change your mind.

  75. Simple by roubles · · Score: 1

    Leave a globally accessible server running in the western world, and run VNC on it. You can VNC into it and access all the the net you want.

  76. Hu Yu Hai Ding? Noh Wan by Anonymous+Cowherd+X · · Score: 1

    What methods and technologies are you aware of or use to circumvent the Great Firewall of China?

    Since the IP this question was posted from belongs to the following net block I don't think I would like to help you con people into helping you catch them, dear Commerade Hu Yu Hai Ding.

    inetnum: 210.52.212.0 - 210.52.224.255
    netname: CNC-SH-IDC
    country: CN
    descr: Shanghai Lekai IDC of China Netcom
    admin-c: CH140-AP
    tech-c: YQ87-AP
    status: ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE
    changed: cncipaddr@china-netcom.com 20040227
    mnt-by: MAINT-CN-ZM28
    mnt-lower: MAINT-CN-SHIDC
    source: APNIC

    Yours truly,
    Wai Noh Ping (I think your firewall is blocking ICMP traffic)

  77. His next ask slashdot... by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 4, Funny

    Taking my freedom with me to jail

    On how to take his limited Chinese freedom of information searching to Chinese prison.

    1. Re:His next ask slashdot... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      He should practice making wallets to prepare himself for Chinese forced labor camps.

      The secret to traveling abroad is.. don't make waves.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:His next ask slashdot... by BrainInAJar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Forced labour camps?

      Who makes the liscence plates in new hamshire? Prisoners.

      Fix your yard before telling your neighbor to mow his.

    3. Re:His next ask slashdot... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      They aren't forced to work in US prisons. It's just that the alternative is to sit in your cell bored for weeks on end.

      California prisons have lots of different options and the prisons actually pull in a profit on the goods and services they sell made with cheap prison labor. but it's not forced, although it's more of a voluneteer program considering the pay is so tiny.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    4. Re:His next ask slashdot... by flosofl · · Score: 1

      But the I beleive the prisoners do make wages for that work. Perhaps its only tender that you can exchange for goods (such as radios or what not) in the prison store(I'm not sure if they are paid in US currency), but it is a remuneration for services rendered.

      AFAIK, the forced-labor camps in China are basically slave shops.

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    5. Re:His next ask slashdot... by rjh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The difference is this: in the United States, prison labor may only be used to produce goods and services for the state. It is illegal for prison-produced goods to compete on the open market and it is illegal for prisons to profit off anyone but other governmental agencies.

      For instance, if you're a government executive and the government gives you an allowance with which to outfit your office, you can buy desks for a song. Prisons who teach woodworking as a trade skill offer some beautifully-made things for under $100. They can do this because their labor costs are pretty much nothing. However, the prison can only sell it to other branches of the government--you won't find them for sale in the prison gift shop.

      Prison labor is also used to clean up roadways; to dig firebreaks in areas where forest fires are a concern; to make license plates; etc.

      I'm not offended by manual labor in the service of the state being a criminal punishment. I'm offended by the idea of convicts being used to make their wardens and jailers independently wealthy, which is precisely what happens in China.

      Before you go about preaching there's no difference between what we do and what they do, you may wish to learn what the difference is.

    6. Re:His next ask slashdot... by jagapen · · Score: 1
      The difference is this: in the United States, prison labor may only be used to produce goods and services for the state. It is illegal for prison-produced goods to compete on the open market and it is illegal for prisons to profit off anyone but other governmental agencies.

      Nope, no longer true. Excerpt:

      • Oregon prisoners sew jeans called "Prison Blues." Inmates are paid anywhere from 28 cents to $8.00/hour, but 80 percent of the higher wage is withheld.
      • In 1994, a local prison secretly slipped Chicago-area prisoners into a Toys R Us store to stock shelves. Union protests stopped it.
      • Southern California youth offenders book flights for TWA.
      • Private companies hire prisoners in Ohio, California and other states to do data processing inside prisons.
    7. Re:His next ask slashdot... by Funksaw · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but that's just plain wrong. If you call up an airline, you're most likely talking with a prisoner. The Prison-Industrial complex in America is real and growing.

    8. Re:His next ask slashdot... by strikethree · · Score: 1

      at one point in time, my brother assembled Dell computers while he was in prison. prisoners do make commercial products in american prisons nowadays.

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    9. Re:His next ask slashdot... by Anonymous+Cowpart · · Score: 1

      You seem to imply that the motivation makes any difference. Why does it matter to someone
      who has to do forced labour what is done with the resulting product ? It is forced labour regardless
      Now, you might argue that the conditions under which they labour are different, and you might have a point.

  78. Personal proxy via ssh by Dr.Zap · · Score: 1

    Legal issues aside, what I would do is rent a box on the internet, and connect to it using openssh. Redirect whatever ports you need to your local machine and you have an encrypted tunnel.

  79. Instead, move to India by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

    You can circumvent, break and twist as many laws/rules (and other such stuff) as you want, and nobody would bother you.

    99% chances are that you will survive with all these, 1% chances that you will be caught, but that would take another 10 years or so.

  80. In my experiences in red china by RegalBegal · · Score: 1

    well first off...

    *this message has been censored by the chinese government, have a good day*

    That's all you need to remember.

    Hope that helps, enjoy your trip!

    --
    "It'll destroy you if you try to make it mean anything to anyone but yourself." - Henry Rollins
  81. I know someone in China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I know someone in China who is from the U.S. He has been there for several years now. He has found that they censor a LOT of sites, many that don't really make sense to censor. So he uses proxy servers to get around this limitation. A lot of people over there do that. Supposedly its not a big deal.

  82. elgooG by matt+me · · Score: 1

    BBC News - news.bbc.co.uk is blocked. As is Google.

    But as reported last month in NewScientist, you can use elgooG - (an impressive perl script that reflects Google, results and cached pages) to get past the GFoC.

    http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn2768
    http://www.alltooflat.com/geeky/elgoog/

    It's also mentioned in the article that there's a relay server in China run by the Berkman Center for Internet & Society that can be used to test what gets in through the GFoC.

  83. First in a series of Ask Slashdots! by Alsee · · Score: 4, Funny

    Taking My Freedom With Me to China?
    Taking My Cocaine With Me to the US?
    Taking Kiddy Porn With Me to England?
    Taking Salman Rushdie With Me to Iran?

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:First in a series of Ask Slashdots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Dear Ask Slashdot,
      What Freedom?

      Kind regards,
      Dubya!

      -r

    2. Re:First in a series of Ask Slashdots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Taking My Cocaine With Me to the US?

      Or like the russian guy who brought his Adobe E-Book cracking software to a security conference in the US and got locked up for it.

      "George W. Bush The Great Divider"

      Whatduyoumean?

      Bush was the first man in all history to unite the Shiite and Suni groups in Iraq by providing them something to rally against. For that accomplishment alone, he deserves to be called the greatest uniting force in the mideast.

    3. Re:First in a series of Ask Slashdots! by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      Taking Salman Rushdie With Me to Iran?

      Aw, you have a Salman Rushdie? I want one. Where'd you get yours? Answer me, puny human!

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    4. Re:First in a series of Ask Slashdots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot "Taking Chewing Gum With Me to Singapore".

    5. Re:First in a series of Ask Slashdots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brilliant... fuckin' brilliant.

    6. Re:First in a series of Ask Slashdots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bush was the first man in all history to unite the Shiite and Suni groups in Iraq by providing them something to rally against

      United? They weren't even disunited enough in the first place to 'unite'. Sure. And it's more of the Sunni variety rather than Shiite providing the insurgent activity in Iraq.

    7. Re:First in a series of Ask Slashdots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that woosh! you just heard was the sound of a joke going over your head.

    8. Re:First in a series of Ask Slashdots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      WHy is this funny? THis peon is nothing and his comments and sig deserve nothing.

      All left wing pinkos must grow up

  84. Move along hippie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    USA can attack another country "Just Like That"



    Thank god.

  85. TROLL? by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    I could grumble about how all the legitimate stories I've submitted have all been rejected, but I won't.

    I've got a solution for you!

    Call your travel agent before it's too late and cancel your plane ticket.

    You've offically had your right to travel abroad revoked because YOUR A JACKASS.

    Unless your entering a country with the direct agenda of working towards overthrowing their government, I don't see how your question is even remotely legit.

    Otherwise, I would expect that you'd just obey any local laws and ordances. If you issues with the laws, the best solution is not to go.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    1. Re:TROLL? by phasm42 · · Score: 1

      Okay, I've had enough of these stupid posts. I see a lot of posts with this attitude, and people asking "how would you feel about people doing similar things to the US"? Well, he's not talking about overthrowing the government, or planting bombs, or assassinating anybody. Just how to access information freely. That's it.

      If someone was planning on coming to the US and asked about how to bypass the DMCA or obtain anonymous internet access, I'd have no problem with it. What he wants to do does not affect anyone else, just his own personal freedom. Equating this with OVERTHROWING THE GOVERNMENT is ignorant.

      And yes, I've spent some time in China (couple months), and those saying that if you're not stirring up trouble you'll be mostly okay are correct. I don't know much about how much internet monitoring is done, but I do know people are a bit paranoid about it, so there's probably something to watch out for there.

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
  86. Personal Freedoms, too... by doppleganger871 · · Score: 0

    I'd be more worried about freedoms that you're not going to have other than information... Travel, personal protection, due process, other stuff that is taken for granted, especially in the USA.

  87. Yep, it was a total troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably inspired by the fact that the last China article (okay every China article) had nothing but flamefests for comments.

    Someone In The Know :-)

  88. tunnels? by Hyksos · · Score: 1

    How can the government know what traffic is flowing in an SSH tunnel going to the States or Europe or whatever? Or do they have restrictions against that too? Even if they do, as some other poster pointed out, they really don't care. This other poster was modded funny for some reason, I would call it insightful. They don't care what information foreigners get hold of/release, as long as they don't try to overthrow the government. So if you plan on doing that, I suggest you dig yourself a spider hole á la Saddam first :)

  89. One positive thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since you'll be going to pound-me-in-the-ass prison for the rest of your life for attempting what you want, it's good to keep in mind that the Asian male has a demonstrably smaller penis size than his Western counterpart.

  90. First rule of Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First rule of Wikipedia: never trust it on controversial issues. For Georgw W Bush, Maryann vs Ginger, and Tiber? look elsewhere.

    1. Re:First rule of Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah! Wonderful ad hominem--and, of course, it leaves the actually issue totally undressed. If you have nothing to respond with, why waste the bandwidth?

    2. Re:First rule of Wikipedia by CarrionBird · · Score: 1

      Not really, the parent was using wikipedia as an sole authoritative source. He responded well enough to that.

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    3. Re:First rule of Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ad hominem, eh? I don't think that means what you think it means...unless Wikipedia is a person now.

    4. Re:First rule of Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you, pretending to be interested in serious debate, post as AC. Fuck you, china-apologist. Tibet was invaded and is militarily occupied by China, no matter what you scrawled on wikipedia.

    5. Re:First rule of Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the nations of native Americans were invaded and militarily occupied by Great Britain, followed by the United States.

      Sheesh.

    6. Re:First rule of Wikipedia by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      AC said: Ah! Wonderful ad hominem--and, of course, it leaves the actually issue totally undressed. If you have nothing to respond with, why waste the bandwidth?

      My reply: Ah! Wonderful ad hominem--and, of course, it leaves the actual issue totally unadressed. If you have nothing to respond with, why waste the bandwidth?

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    7. Re:First rule of Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears that the CIA considers Tibet to be part of China.

    8. Re:First rule of Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But were on a holy mission to free the world from tyranny and oppression. Now shut the hell up and admit we're right!

    9. Re:First rule of Wikipedia by Apro+im · · Score: 1

      it leaves the actually issue totally undressed

      The issue screams: "Get out of here! I'm changing!"

      I'm not really sure why you used an adverb...

    10. Re:First rule of Wikipedia by Winkhorst · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Government of Tibet in Exile: http://www.tibet.com/

      --
      "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
    11. Re:First rule of Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The government of the Native Nations... in exile in their own land: http://www.aimovement.org/

    12. Re:First rule of Wikipedia by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      Wow! Nice boobies!!!

    13. Re:First rule of Wikipedia by QMO · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Spain, France, Portugal, Aztec, Navajo . . . (the list goes on)
      There were a lot of nations killing nations in the Americas, even before Europeans joined.
      Of course, that doesn't excuse anyone, individual or nation.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    14. Re:First rule of Wikipedia by peawee03 · · Score: 1

      As a white American who enjoys his middle-class lifestyle, well, you're statement is quite correct. They didn't call the series of post American Civil War military campaigns "The Indian Wars" for nothing.

      --
      I wish I could write clever and witty sigs.
  91. Problem solved by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "What methods and technologies are you aware of or use to circumvent the Great Firewall of China?"

    A simple unencrypted squid proxy. I live in China, and some sites are blocked (BBC News, Miami Herald, etc). I set up a proxy on a linux box in the USA, and I use it whenever I encounter a blocked site (hit F12-x in Opera to toggle).

    It's also useful when there's simply a bad connection or slow speed. Often, I can't get a good connection to some site or other, and it's not blocked, I know it's up, but the crappy infrastructure here drops my packets. So, even if there were no Great Firewall, I'd still have my proxy handy. The Great Firewall isn't too concerned with English language websites. As far as I know, only Chinese and English language sites are blocked...any other nationalities get off scot-free.

    And don't worry about getting clubbed in the head by the cops, or anything stupid like that. China is just like everywhere else...you mess with the bull, you get the horns. Hell, we smoke joints openly on the street. Nobody knows what it smells like. We went out on a lake, and the boatman asked, "why are you 6 people sharing one cigarette...you don't have enough money to afford cigarettes for everyone?"

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Problem solved by z_gringo · · Score: 1

      I thought drug use carried the death penalty in China? Is that true?

      --
      -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
    2. Re:Problem solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      One thing to remember. Somking joints is fine at China. But don't touch those hard stuff. 50 gram is death penalty.

    3. Re:Problem solved by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      I live in China, and some sites are blocked (BBC News, Miami Herald, etc).

      What the fuck is subversive about Dave Barry?

      p

    4. Re:Problem solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are risking a possible death penalty if you are caught with drugs, dude. Good luck.

  92. you're a flamebaiting troll, BUT by dknight · · Score: 1

    I cant help but bite anyway.

    there are perfectly legitimate reasons for moving to china for some period. I considered moving there myself for a year or two to study kung fu. Would that make me a traitor?

    thats just unreasonable

    1. Re:you're a flamebaiting troll, BUT by scorp1us · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure, you lived there and supported the country. You could have found an instructor here who came from China because HE wanted to be free and teach his art. Where you learn martial arts is not important. 'Who' matters more than anything. And don't tell me we don't have ang good instructors here.

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    2. Re:you're a flamebaiting troll, BUT by dknight · · Score: 1

      compared to china?
      we dont.

      believe me, I've looked. The best in this country are out in california. Now, dont get me wrong, they're quite good. but they dont come close to training (for example) with the beijing kung fu team.

      wanna know something shocking? someone as treasonous as me works for the DoD! *gasp!*

  93. SSH tunnel to a proxy by venom600 · · Score: 1

    ssh -L 3128:some-good.proxy.com:3128 some-ssh-host-outside-of-china

    Set your proxy server to localhost.

    Problem solved.

    1. Re:SSH tunnel to a proxy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cough* Traffic analysis *cough*

  94. Don't by SpecBear · · Score: 1

    So let me get this straight: You want help circumventing the laws of a nation you intend to visit. And this isn't just any nation, but a nation where it's not unheard of for dissidents to be dealt with via a bullet to the head. I'm trying to figure out just what combination of arrogance, foolishness, and pr0n addiction made you even consider this.

    When in Rome, do as the Romans. Or just stay the hell out of Rome.

  95. Only two rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    1. Don't brag about how to circumvent the Great Firewall of China.
    You can do it, you can talk about it in private, or semi publicly. But if you try to publish an article about it, you may get into trouble. But of course YMMD.

    2. Keep your head down.
    Try not to get involved into politics. Talking about it with friends is no big deal. Don't mix politics and foreign money, and avoid contacts with people disagree with the communism party and get money from foreign country, either goverments or some foundations.

    Other than these rules, you will be fine, and you will find cheaper games, moives and musics. Did I mention Chinese food?

  96. Porn, MP3s, Warez ok. Unpolular politics BAD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you Han? The goverment may treat you differently if you are ethnic Chinese.

    Where are you planning on staying? Coastal cities such as Shanghai are much more open.

    From my experiences in Shanghai, Porn, Warez and MP3's are easy to get. Heck, there is an open air market around Shanghai University that's filled with Warez vendors. Most video shops also have a porn section discretely tucked away. What will get you in real trouble is critizing the goverment or advocating "anti-goverment" policies. As long as you keep your head down and don't make waves no one will care what you do.

  97. Hmmmm.... by ChiGodOfKarma · · Score: 1

    I think I would rather be gang raped in prison by a band of evil satan worshiping midgets than get caught breaking the law in China. Then again I was always kind of partial to the idea of midget prison gangs. ;)

  98. L33t H@x by Logicdisorder · · Score: 1

    Have a Linux box setup in the states and SSH from China to it. I am sure they have not stopped SSH though there firewall.

    This is not that L33t really I am just a sad old man!

    WORD OUT!

    --
    "The most dangerous creation of any society is that man who has nothing to lose." - James Baldwin, American author
  99. Dude please read this one. by jamej · · Score: 1

    Go ahead and get around the pesky censorship thing - get caught, no lawyer, no rights, go to jail go straight to jail do not pass the embassy. Next, hope you don't need serious medical treatment fast. You don't have enough priviledge to get it. Hope you like working for the military because their general staff runs most of their large companies directly or indirectly. Nice place to visit but I wouldn't want to live there, need medical there, or piss off the authorities.

  100. VPN tunnel. by loucura! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Our company has employees in China, and their work requires that they be able to access our corporate systems. So, they've got a VPN connection through the GFC, that VPN connection also includes unfiltered Internet access. From what I'm told by our Network Admin, unfiltered access is something of a status symbol over there.

    --
    Black and grey are both shades of white.
  101. So Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Global Warming! SUVs!!! Hairspray!! Microwave Popcorn!!! OH MY GOD!!!

  102. Piercing the Great Firewall by laing · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've taken a few trips to P.R.C. since my wife is from there. I had a few problems trying to upload photos from a digital camera to a server back home (yes, I used disposable passwords). First I attempted to FTP the files directly to the server. I found that the FTP connection was dropped after transferring about 8k bytes. Next, I tried http put to my web server with a similar result. Finally I tried to send each picture as an e-mail attachment. This also failed. It seems that China does not want any unauthorized information going OUT of the country. I finally tried running an FTP server locally on the dynamic IP (163.net) and connecting to it from outside (after telnetting to my US based server). Amazingly enough it worked! Files can be moved out of China from an internal server but not from a client.

    As far as free access to information goes, good luck. They seem to have several layers of control. The first layer is DNS. Just about any US based radio or TV domain name will not resolve. You might be able to get to the site if you can get the IP address (perhaps using a method similar to above). Many sites use the hostname in the http query to determine which site to serve, in these cases you're out of luck. There may be DNS and web proxies that you can use but these are fleeting.

    --
    Sigs are a waste of space

    1. Re:Piercing the Great Firewall by Lostman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just as a note about virtual web sites...

      For the sake of argument - lets say Slashdot is a virtual websites (on same box as, say, 30 other web sites). If you know the ip address is 54.14.54.163 you might have trouble getting to it... but....

      In windows you can add a listing in the HOSTS file such that slashdot automatically resolves (regardless of what dns says) to 54.14.54.163 - so it will send the correct GET string to the IP address in order to view the site.

      You can use this in times when you have a new webhost and your dns hasnt moved over yet, and you cannot access it via ip only (virtual websites) - lets you modify it for a few days before dns fully propogates (sp). ... If you can do this in windows, I am -sure- you can in linux.

    2. Re:Piercing the Great Firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If sigs are a waste of space, why do you add it onto your post? Just disable sigs, and don't make us look at your "clever sayings". Its almost as stupid as those who pretend to have sigs but really just add an ad for their stupid "Free iPod" thing at the end of their post.

    3. Re:Piercing the Great Firewall by Zenithal · · Score: 1

      above). Many sites use the hostname in the http query to determine which site to serve, in these cases you're out of luck. There may be DNS and web proxies that you can use but these are fleeting.

      That's not completely true. You can just slap the domain you want in your hosts file with the appropriate ip and then just use the domain as normal.

      --


      Aaron
      AaronCameron.net
    4. Re:Piercing the Great Firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as we're talking about anecdotal evidence here, I managed to email digital photos just fine (zip files attatched to GMail messages) last July.

    5. Re:Piercing the Great Firewall by nimid · · Score: 1

      Actually, you'll find that it's probably more to do with your MTU than China censoring you.

      If they were really observing all your photographs being uploaded in realtime I think most of the 1.6 billion people in China would be too busy monitoring incoming/outgoing connections to live a productive life.

      I had this problem too but I can still send anything out that I choose to send with enough effort and without resorting to anything other than patience and occasionally having to use my connection when the traffic isn't at it's peak.

      Perhaps your analysis of the situation isn't quite correct?

      --
      A hundred and twenty characters ought to be enough for anyone...
    6. Re:Piercing the Great Firewall by laing · · Score: 1

      Sorry but if it were an MTU problem, the first 8K would not have made it out OK. The maximum MTU is 1500 octets. MTU was the first thing I thought of so I reduced it to 200 with no positive effect.

    7. Re:Piercing the Great Firewall by nimid · · Score: 1

      So are you telling us you've been taking pornographic/subversive pictures?

      I'm just teasing now ;)

      --
      A hundred and twenty characters ought to be enough for anyone...
    8. Re:Piercing the Great Firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have sigs disabled, you insensitive clod!

    9. Re:Piercing the Great Firewall by loyukfai · · Score: 1

      IMHO, you were probably just having a bad connection or there was a strangely configured transparent proxy.

      It seems that China does not want any unauthorized information going OUT of the country.

      As many posters have pointed out, the Great Firewall is more for blocking access to subversive information about the government rather then monitoring.

    10. Re:Piercing the Great Firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are of course welcome to your opinion. I observed the same behavior on dial-up, broadband (ADSL), and GPRS. It was not due to a bad connection.

  103. NAK by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    When you don't get any meaningful replies from inside China, you'll know that the answer is really "No freedom here, move along".

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  104. There are two Chinas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are two Chinas, and the one you defend is one of the worst empires left in the world. They are threatening to trash the other China (Taiwan) for no other reason than "we want it!". Tibet never attacked mainland China, yet the PROC trashed it and holds it today. Why? "We want it!".

    1. Re:There are two Chinas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taiwan is rightfully a part of China. Most Taiwanese want reunification with mainland China.

    2. Re:There are two Chinas by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      According to whom? I presume that's why Mainland China and Taiwan have different names for the island? Although it is true that most Taiwanese want reunification with the mainland Chinese people; many families have members living in both locations.

    3. Re:There are two Chinas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure it was PROC that made Tibet part of China for the first time? Tibet has been part of China proper before the Qing dynasty.

  105. bribery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure at all what sort of security the Chinese government uses to stop you from accessing forbidden hosts, so i can't be of much help there. But even if you do get caught by someone you could most likely bribe them to shut up.

  106. Punch a hole in the great wall with VPN by Laptop+Dancer · · Score: 1
    I was in China last year during the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square Uprising, and it was interesting to watch the news and surf online. In a western hotel, (the Four Seasons), watching CNN or BBC, occasionally a story would begin to run on the anniversary, then the screen would go blank and silent for the duration of the story. When I'd surf news sites, references to Tiananmen were missing, but when I switched to my corporate VPN, as expected they were all there.

    It was also interesting that my normally digital phone connection had a new icon I'd never seen, indicating that the connection was unencrypted. So my advice would be to find someone to host a VPN endpoint for you from the west, email, surf and Skype though it.

  107. Welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our chinese censoring overlords.

  108. SSH is your friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Posting anonymously so as not to jeapordise any future trips :-)

    I hacked the Great Firewall!

    When I went to China, I found that a few sites that I visit regularly, such as BBC News, were blocked, so I set up an SSH tunnel to a box back home running Squid, and did all my browsing through that. Worked fine.

  109. Dual Standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, first of all their control is mainly aimed at Chinese citizens. For example the newspapers available to visitors are uncensored.

    Secondly, China is not as bad as you might think generally but can be much worse than you might think specifically. In other words, people in general are fairly free there but if you get noticed and listed as an enemy of the state you'll be in very big trouble.

    For example, I personally never take pictures or even carry a camera within China because they're always a chance they'll accuse you of spying. (Like what we'd do to an arab taking pictures of tall buildings).

    Best bet is simply not to stand out, or if you do stand out do so as an obvious outsider. The worst thing to do is stand out as an insider.

  110. Acctually been and done that by pondelik · · Score: 1

    I spent three months in Beijing in the early part of last year. And I did quite a bit of web surfing. I experienced very little problems. But I kept mainly to news sites and such. Supprsingly I find more sites blocked at work when in the States. All in all I would say you have little to worry about. P.S. Just don't got to MaoSucks.com

  111. ssh + links & mutt by t482 · · Score: 1

    Just get an account with a hosting company located outside of China that has ssh access and use links to browse anything you want from there. mutt or pine could take care of the mail.

    Alternatively you could use something like tor + ssh + port forwarding.

    Most stuff isn't blocked anyway - I think it mostly to supress the falun gong and similar pro-democracy movements.

    1. Re:ssh + links & mutt by t482 · · Score: 1

      Oh and make sure you read this article about the history of Taiwan before you head over there:
      "Well, Taiwan has always been a part of China.

  112. Chanelling by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think Solo Han may be chanelling Mao. You are basically asking people to explain how to circumvent their government's controls, when that government is known to do some rather painful things to those that subvert the government?
    I call Shenanagins, the question is either just troll BS, or the the guy asking it is too dumb to utilize the answers.
    Face it, would anyone comming to the US really ask, in a public forum, how do I get around the US's stupid drug laws? (Please don't answer this, I'm trying to nurture a little faith in humanity)

    --
    Necessity is the mother of invention.
    Laziness is the father.
  113. Speaking from experience.......... by gabacho · · Score: 1

    I lived in Shanghai for 2 1/2 years, having returned about 4 years ago. I still return frequently as part of my job. The Chinese really don't care much what westerners do in China as long as you stay away from the Tibet issue, Falun gong and such things. I had dial up access and it appeared that foreigners and chinese went through different connections. I was never certain if I was being blocked or not. I could never get anything that was geocities. If you are going to connect rhruogh hotel DSL you will likely be blocked as the Cinses would be but there could be exceptions. I have never had my baggage checked going in or out of the country and I have come and gone many times. They know Westerners know the score and simply don't mess with them. I lived in a 30-something story apt building that was not set aside for westerners and I was stuck with Chinese television only. If you live with the laowai you can even have a sattelite dish. If you just go about your business you won't have any trouble. Just don't do things you obviously should not be doing. Magazines and such are censored as far as what you can buy locally. But you can bring in pretty much whatever you want. They just don't want the chinese to have access.

    --
    (This sig has been removed at the request of the patent holder for Sigs.)
  114. Parent is funny! by gtkuhn · · Score: 1

    Mod that guy up.

  115. I live in China.. by fliptout · · Score: 3, Insightful

    though I'm in the USA for the moment..

    You probably will not notice a substantial abridgement of your freedoms when you get there. However, due to the developing nature of China, many processes are highly aggravating.

    Sure, you cannot access porn online- as easily as in the USA. It is still there, and you can find it.

    One thing that really has pissed me off was that I left my computer at home in the USA running a server registered with DynDNS- I'm guessing all the domains with DDNS are blocked by china. I justed wanted access to my own stuff at home, not to start an insurrection.

    All I can say is, feel free to express yourself at the right time, but use discretion.

    If you want access to all your files, buy a 1GB flashdrive and copy all your important stuff on to that. Buy 2 or 3 if you need, or take a laptop.

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
  116. Like the Russan guy Adobe imprisoned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Just ask the Russian Cracker Dmitry Sklyarov who got locked up for cracking Adobe's e-book.

    such hackers aren't viewed upon kindly.

  117. Remote Access by mallfouf · · Score: 1

    A year ago, i was in Saudi Arabia, in Mecca. I met the manager of the hotel i was staying in, and we just became friends during my stay there. I told him i was looking for an internet cafe, and i wasn't able to find one anywhere. He was aware of only one in the whole city, which surprised me as Mecca is a big city, and it was pretty far from where we were. He mentioned that the connection was really slow, and that it's really a hasle to get there, so he invited me to use the only connection the hotel has, which was from his personal machine.
    He explained that they weren't able to access certain international news sites, and that everything was monitored by the government. I tried the sites he requested, and I wasn't able to connect. So i decided to Remote Desktop to my office's server here in the US. I was able to connect, and from there, i accessed all the sites he wanted. It made him pretty happy, and from then, he allowed me to come in anytime and use his machine. :)

    Moral of the Story: Have a machine outside the country (at a friend's house, or business) that you can access anytime, from anywhere. You can make that machine your internet gateway, and it will allow you to access almost any info you're looking for.

    Anyone has a better solution?

  118. Your stupidity is mind boggling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are people really this naive?

  119. What a sad way to define "freedom" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    He says nothing about the freedom to speak or offer others his opinions or views. Or freedom to express parody. He says nothing about freedom to practice a religion of his choice. Or about any freedoms that are actually real and important. How very sad, that his idea of "freedom" is simply being able to access web sites he chooses and download some music and porn. Yes, he would make the perfect American consumer for the future corporations have in mind here.

    1. Re:What a sad way to define "freedom" by gothzilla · · Score: 1

      Wow. MOD PARENT UP!

    2. Re:What a sad way to define "freedom" by rmccann · · Score: 1

      Expression is worthless if noone else can hear it. I'm sure chinese people can express all thay want in the shower. However they can't express it from a newspaper or website. Allowing people to read any website means there is effictivly no censorship and everyone can express what they want.

    3. Re:What a sad way to define "freedom" by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is even more to freedom, but we don't often consider it;
      Can I run naked through a shopping center?
      Can I camp on the courthouse lawn?
      Can I figure out how to circumvent a security feature that is merely there to insure profits and share that information?
      Can I build my own amusement park or radio station on my lawn without a license?
      Can I do much of anything without a license?
      Can I drive a car without a safety belt, drive a motorcycle without a helmet, or drink alcohol?
      Can I use pot or some other drug that isn't all that unhealthy?
      Can I sell my prescription medicine to someone else?
      Can I sell my own ticket to the sports game to someone else for a profit?
      Can I choose not to pay taxes because the money is used for things I don't want?
      Can I sign up for the military and choose not to go?
      Can I trespass on private property?
      Can I attend a Bush meeting of any sort without being a supporter?
      Can I choose my own government without a privately owned and rigged election system?
      Can I get the truth about anything?

      None of the previous actually hurts other people directly, but they are all proscribed. I'm not saying we shouldn't wear safety belts. The point is, that we are a nation with the opportunity for people to have privileges. Those privileges are usually restricted by money and the resources to attain them; like getting a radio broadcast license.

      The list could go on. Let's just say; "Americans have the right to say many things out loud." Saying; "Americans are free" is just confusing.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    4. Re:What a sad way to define "freedom" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello? This is a technology news site. How would freedom of speech be something worthy of posting? But a topic on internet site blocking and circumvention makes it more than appropriate. People, please don't assume that /. is the entire world of everything! This is about technology and thus the topics reflect that. There are PLENTY of other sites out there dedicated to such topics, but this isn't one of them.

  120. Use a VPN connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Setup a VPN connection using IPSec, or if your machine will be running windows, L2TP of IPSec is an options. You will of course have to maintain a computer in the US to terminate this.

    Setup your VPN connection to route all your traffic over it. You will seriously slow yourself down, but this will blend in with all the other traffic generated by US business men. Lots of companies won't allow their remote machines direct Internet access when connected to the VPN, and China isn't going to tell the US businessmen they can't connect back to the home office to do work.

    Don't try to do anything too non standard, it might raise a flag.

  121. I do not work for the chinese government by ostrich2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hello, I know it is possible to circumvent the Chinese Firewall and such, but exactly how do you do it? Who is your contact in the Network Administration Administration? Do you discuss these issues with other people inside the firewall? What are their names and do you know where they live? No, I am just curious. I do not work for the glorious and envied government of PRC.

  122. Breaking the law! by khanta · · Score: 1

    After reading what you have said, I feel you are just looking for a way to break the law. There is no other way to put it. Circumvent, avoid, being surreptitious, clandestine, stealthy. It does not matter. As other people have posted, do not do it. There is no "Please stop that" letter or email, if you piss off the wrong people, you will not be happy. My advice, with that mentality, do not move to China. Good luck either way.

    --
    ourney weaver
  123. Hyperspeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make sure it's still working on your Falcon, and don't forget Chewy. Chewy might actually like the Yetis in the south.

  124. This is surely a troll post? by zurtle · · Score: 1
    Even if Chinese are permitted to view this US-centric site, English isn't THAT widespread. If most people haven't noticed, a lot of their websites are Chinese and NOT English!!!

    I suspect this guy's just yanking your chains.

    --
    Couldn't stand the weather
  125. Move to Korea by klaasb · · Score: 1

    South Korea that is.

    Highspeed internet access without borders.

    And the food is great too.

    --
    if your pants fit well, it's not only because of the pants ...
  126. Not "Celestial Kingdom", "Middle Kingdom" by JLavezzo · · Score: 1

    Yeah, um, what's the "Celestial Kingdom"? China is "Jong-Guo" meaning "Middle Kingdom". I'm pretty sure even in Chinese, "Celestial Kingdom" refers to the afterlife.

    Kind of interesting is that in Chinese, the United States is called "Mae-Guo" which means, "Beautiful Country". Pretty complimentary of them, eh?

    1. Re:Not "Celestial Kingdom", "Middle Kingdom" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not entirely correct. For nations that came into contact with China relatively late in history, the Chinese chose sounds that were relatively similar for a given nation's name.

      To be specific, the Mandarin for England is "Yin Guo". It's literal translation is "Brave Country", but the Chinese chose it because the "Yin" sounded similar to how we say "Een" in England, not because they were trying to compliment the British.

      For more information:
      http://www.inu.org/meiwah/page13.htm

    2. Re:Not "Celestial Kingdom", "Middle Kingdom" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of interesting is that in Chinese, the United States is called "Mae-Guo" which means, "Beautiful Country". Pretty complimentary of them, eh?

      Yes it is, but I think that it predates the current government by at least a century. However, the PRC was nice enough not to give us a less salutory "offical" name.

  127. Not so bad, but really slow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, just came back from south China, so I can tell you my real experience.

    Despite we had a fast internet connection (I don't know the details, but we had a network cable coming out from the outside through a wall!) it was terribly slow to surf the web on European / American web sites.

    I could get to almost all the news/technical sites I wanted (slashdot was fine). The only address I had problems with was www.ogre3d.org , a LGPL 3D graphics engine. I really couldn't figure out why...

    For chinese web sites the speed was really fast, so I believe the slowdown for western web sites was due to a deep checking by some government proxies... and it's not true at all that you can't find mp3 and games. Despite of my poor knowledge of written chinese I could download a lot of cool stuff (just to check if it was possible or not, looking forward to a slashdot post, of course!)

    About Pr0n I can't say anything... didn't know how to delete all the temps on the chinese version of internet explorer and I was at my girlfriend's parents house! :)

    1. Re:Not so bad, but really slow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If figure ogre3d.org runs postnuke. Perhaps they were hacked sometime ago and had a text like "Kill all chinese", "Free tibet" or vice versa on their page.

  128. Don't draw the conclusion so fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's well known on slashdot that there is little freedom in China, while most of the readers here draw the conclusion based on other/media/etc. You have a perfect chance the testify. I hope you don't draw the conclusion so fast.

    Great wall of internet is here, for sure. Hay, you are slashdotter, you know how to setup proxy. It's easy to bypass it. Nothing special.

    Other freedomyou mentioned? you can feel it.
    1. You can pretty much take anything in China, custom officer rarely check your bag. Nothing like US custom.
    2. Pr0n? Go to any style shaloon/hair cut/night club/Karaoke/etc/etc, that is all for you. They are all real, why do you still care those stupid pictures and videos?
    3. MP3? Buy pirated CD on the street. Nobody care you. No MPAA, RIAA, or whateverAA.

    What you can NOT do in China?
    Post a big banner of "Down with the CCP and Chinese government" in Tiananmen Square. That's it! You can do probably anything else (as a normal person). Oh yeah, don't smuggle drugs.

  129. Hyperbole by Dire+Bonobo · · Score: 1
    > Just check with anybody you meet who is an ex-national of Iraq, Iran,
    > China, Cuba, Soviet era-Russia, etc. There aren't too many happy stories to be heard.

    There's no need for hyperbole here. Offhand, I can think of friends from Soviet-era Ukraine and recent China whose childhood stories are fairly happy, so suggesting these countries were/are unremitting hellholes isn't useful - it just undermines your (very valid) point:

    > kids were used to clear minefields. He wasn't lying- check Wikipedia

    We live in a relatively safe and progressive country, but not all parts of the world are so gentle. Be careful.

    (And work to preserve the freedoms we enjoy, as well as assisting others in obtaining them for themselves.)

    1. Re:Hyperbole by bwy · · Score: 1

      whose childhood stories are fairly happy

      I don't dispute this at all- children would have nothing to compare communism to, so those first memories might not be so tainted. Freedom means much more to those who have seen or experienced it.

      This is why the really oppressive governments don't like to let people leave.

    2. Re:Hyperbole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're talking out of your ass. Obviously you haven't lived in a Communist country and don't have anything to compare it against. But thanks for repeating propoganda-without-facts on Slashdot, we don't get enough of it over the course of our day.

  130. The Great Firewall Of China by RagingChipmunk · · Score: 1

    I was in Shanghai last year, and had no problems with web surfing. There were no obvious restrictions/censorship (no more/less than what we get here at home) of sites. Nobody asked for ID before or after web surfing. Nobody baby-sat me while web surfing. I was in Hong Kong yesterday using FREE WIRELESS internet surfing in the airport. No obvious restrictions/censorship. Simply put, the amount of Chinese web-censorship is over rated - sure, it exists, but, then again there's just as much corporate sponsored censorship here. That stated, I wouldnt test my luck by repeatedly probing the edges of what sites were considered 'black listed'. It would be asking for trouble - sort of like peeing on a street corner here. You'll get away with it for awhile, but, sooner or later you'll piss someone off.

    --
    The only PT Boat Journal on the web: http://www.PT171.org
  131. mod parent down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    um... have you ever been to china?

    i have. i've lived there for 5 years, and it's not like you portray it to be.

    if an american moves to china, you might have trouble accessing certain sites directly, but there are ways around that. i've done it millions of times and i'm not in jail.

    it really irritates me how people can have such uninformed opinions and still get modded up.

    1. Re:mod parent down... by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      it really irritates me how people can have such uninformed opinions and still get modded up

      OK, so I get my information from journalists, who interview the families (that are willing to talk) of people who are arrested and jailed for doing things like running web sites, or even just posting information and doing research on other web sites.

      I've seen a lot of responses to my post that sound more or less like, "It's not so bad - if you're a foreigner, you'll be fine!" There should be no exception, whatsoever, to who can go look at a web site. If China truly lightened up on its routine assumptions that visiting academics were spies and up to no good they'd start getting a lot more visitors. Personally, I'd love to soak up some ancient Chinese history first hand. I've got real problems, though, endorsing (by visiting) a country that so capriciously firewalls information from its citizens. That sort of dictatorial news management can't be confused with anything other than direct oppression of freedom of speech. Of course, it would be bad enough if it were just the firewalling - but forcing cyber cafes to close, or arresting people that run information systems - it's right out of Soviet Russia, or fascist Europe 50 years ago.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  132. Bring your freedom with you and share it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a laptop with a DVD/CD burner. Stuff the hard drive with as much material as you can, then burn it and distribute as much as you dare. A stack of personal encryption tools, a couple of Linux distros and lots of applications. Maybe some banned music or political literature, if you dare.

    But whatever you do, don't tell them the Bush administration is trying to spread democracy throughout the world. They're oppressed, not stupid.

  133. yes & no by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    Although I agree laws should be respected to some extent when you travel.

    But polictical censorship need not be respected. Free speech is a fundamental human right.

    I am happy to be living in one of the man freedom loving Democracies that that can say "This law is Stupid" or say "This leader is stupid" and not be silenced. And if our arguments are strong enough we gain support, and if our arguments are stupid we are ignored. And we choose better leaders and write better laws.

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
    1. Re:yes & no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think thats freedom? I don't see you changing your leader when a lot of people say 'bush is stooopid'.

      Sure you can make noise, but when the public is manipulated by lies, lies and more lies, and yet the government still remains the same, whats the point?

      Maybe, if making noise would actually have an impact on elections etc, then maybe the US would find more ways to reduce free speech. At the moment, its not a threat to their power.

  134. USA laws stop at our borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess it is OK to be young and not know that once in a lifetime.

  135. Easy to circumvent by fkicker · · Score: 1


    1. Buy a cheap collocation server based in the US ($50-$100 per month).
    2. Ask for an additional IP address (free).
    2. Install OpenVPN on the server and your desktop (free).
    3. Connect to your Chinese ISP and connect to your VPN.

    All your outbound desktop traffic is now encrypted and passed through a UDP tunnel to your collocation server. The collocation server decrypts the traffic and passes it to the internet. Return traffic is re-encrypted and passed back to your desktop machine through the encrypted UDP tunnel. Looks just like traffic from corporate travelers connecting back to their home offices.

    Extra bonus points for configuring your Linux firewall to encrypt all traffic from your home office and block any stray packets.

  136. Kinda real. by fliptout · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes *chinese* people are arrested... But I wasn't arrested for telling Chinese their policy on Taiwan was utter bullshit. Then again, I was not making a public spectacle.

    I've lived in china, and though it is not quite a utopia, I'll be living there for a few years more.

    Taiwan is cool too; Taipei is a happening place.

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
    1. Re:Kinda real. by LesPaul75 · · Score: 1

      I've lived in china, and though it is not quite a utopia, I'll be living there for a few years more.

      Why? A lot of comments here (and on some past articles) seem to say something similar. "China's not so bad... They really only shoot Chinese people in the head." or "As long as you don't do anything crazy out in public, like talking about religion, or looking at Google News, you probably won't be thrown in jail." Fantastic! So, if I'm lucky, I'll survive the place. But what the hell is so great about it that it's worth the risk, no matter how remote you think it may be?

    2. Re:Kinda real. by fliptout · · Score: 1

      The risk is not that great. And I enjoy living there.

      The economy is booming there, I have oodles of girlfriends, and the people are pleasant.

      In fact, I am fucking ecstatic that people have such bad images of china in their little heads- leaves more good stuff and opportunities for moi.

      --
      A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
    3. Re:Kinda real. by bbc · · Score: 1

      "Why? A lot of comments here (and on some past articles) seem to say something similar. [...] "you probably won't be thrown in jail." [...] But what the hell is so great about it that it's worth the risk, no matter how remote you think it may be?"

      You are right to ask these questions. The risk of going to jail is not negligable. As a matter of fact, it would seem that China has the second largest prison population per capita in the world! A shocking 100 prisoners per 100,000 inhabitants.

      Of course, if this bothers you, I can only urge you to stay far, far away from the country with the largest relative prison population (seven times as much).

    4. Re:Kinda real. by LesPaul75 · · Score: 1

      I don't know... I'm not sure that the "number of people in prison" or even the percentage is a meaningful statistic. I'm more worried about why those people are in prison. I do not want to be in a place where those reasons include exercising freedom of speech or religion.

  137. Watch "Strip Search" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can start by watching the movie "Strip Search"

  138. Note: You Will Be Charged For Your Stay by thelizman · · Score: 1

    ...in jail. That is because China takes the matter of foreigners flaunting Chinese law very seriously, even to the point that you will face harsher punishement than citizens. If arrested and tried, you will be charged for the cost of the trial, your stay in jail, et al, which could amount to hundreds if not thousands. And don't expect the US State Department to come galloping to your aid: You knew better.

  139. For Interest's Sake by clotito · · Score: 1

    Before it gets /.'ed... here is a little more information about the project that spawned this list: "The authors are studying Internet filtering in countries worldwide, including restrictions on Web access in China. There is no master list of blocked sites that we (or, from what we can tell, anyone else) can access. Rather, we test "twenty questions" style, asking about individual URLs, whether based upon a domain name or an IP address. To date, we have obtained lists of sites to check via web directories, search engines, and other automated data-extraction systems. To help broaden the list of pages tested and to provide the general public a means of finding out whether particular pages of interest are filtered, we have created the form below, which will run a realtime query via our methods. We consider this approach an experiment in "open research"; we are as yet uncertain whether sites submitted and tested using this system will in fact broaden our pool of tested sites, but we will analyze submissions and publish results when available."

  140. Oh yea how to circumvent. by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    Proxy services, many are free.

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
  141. it's looser than you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having traveled often in China as a foreigner, I can assure you that while the Chinese government *can* do whatever they feel like to you ... they aren't likely to.

    They don't really give a damn what porn you surf or what political sites you read through a foreign proxy / ssh tunnel, so long as you don't pose a threat to the regime. i.e., read what you like via a foreign-hosted proxy. So long as you don't get local citizens involved, even if they find you, they are extremely unlikely to care.

    As broadband is quite commonly available there, you won't have problems.

    Just don't plan to engage in any sort of public dissent ... don't write a letter to the editor about how dumb the policies of the current party leader are. :-)

    What people in the west don't realize is that the Chinese government is interested in just two things: self preservation and prosperity. So long as you don't threaten the former and may contribute to the latter, you'll be very welcome.

  142. Why Should We Tell You? Look It Up. by cmholm · · Score: 1
    As it turns out, I (and I'm sure, others here) have contacts that can provide first hand information. In addition, the web provides lots of leads.

    But, why on Earth any one would spill their guts here is beyond me. If someone has a specific personal methodology that works, the quickest way to fuck it up is to talk about it.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  143. What?!? by Yeechang+Lee · · Score: 0, Troll
    [W]hile I have just as many problems as y'all do with the government, I still like the freedoms afforded me, especially when it comes to access of information.


    But . . . but . . . I thought we Americans lived in a fascist imperialist warmongering state led by Bushitler who sends his Ashcroftian secret police to raid the homes of those who dare to defy the RIAA and MPAA's edicts! Or something like that. You mean the United States might *not* be the worst place in history to live in?!? Impossible!
  144. Circumvent? by meggito · · Score: 1

    If you're moving to a new country I do not think that breaking their laws is a good way to get started. If you are going to move to China then you have no right to complain about the laws. We'll leave that to those born there. If you beleive that a country's policy on *insert problem here* are wrong then you have a choice... you can either suck it up and go by their rules or you can go to another country. Stop thinking that because you dont like thier system you can ignore it. Next thing you know they'll come over here and start thinking they can censure our newspapers.

  145. Let me put it another way by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    Samuel Adams, speech at the Philadelphia State House, August 1, 1776:

    "If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  146. A friend of mine is there now and has no problems by gphinch · · Score: 1

    An ex-gf of mine is over there going to school, and I asked her this very question, and she said she hadn't noticed any difference. Now she's not really nerdy or anything, but we talk on AIM sometimes and I've tested it by saying anti-communist things and such, but no secret police have arrested her yet.

    --
    in bed.
  147. Don't Do It by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    what are the websites, search engines, news sites, and other sites that are classed as potentially 'dangerous' material?
    Does it really matter? The very fact that the government asserts it has the right to take things away from you, is dangerous in itself.

    In many countries, the government also restricts access to some things, but it's very narrow and with at least some attempt at justifications (whether you agree with the justification or not). In fact, off the top of my head, the only thing I can think of that is really off-limits in the west is kiddie-porn (though Nazi stuff is also nearly as taboo in some parts of Europe).

    Forget the details and look at the big picture: you're getting yourself into a situation where there is no social contract. The Chinese government doesn't feel the need to justify anything and is simply unaccountable to its people. The list of what is restricted can change, and there's not a damn thing anyone can do about it. You can try technical workarounds, but you'll live in fear of being discovered.

    Nothing is worth that.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:Don't Do It by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      In fact, off the top of my head, the only thing I can think of that is really off-limits in the west is kiddie-porn

      You are forgetting many things, probably because they are too obvious. Detailed plans to airports, government buildings, security arrangements, nuclear weapons design, and plenty of other things are entirely off limits. Another obvious class of information are trade secrets, and you may be in violation of related laws if somebody leaves a folder in a conference room and you open it to read. A third obvious class cover personal medical information, library records, and such.

      You can get in various degrees of serious trouble for trying to access any of these.

    2. Re:Don't Do It by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      Detailed plans to airports, government buildings, security arrangements, nuclear weapons design, and plenty of other things are entirely off limits.
      These things aren't off-limits. The present US government has been trying to hide these kinds of things, but if you were to, say, find them on a foreign website, you wouldn't be punished for reading them.
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  148. My limitted experience from pre1989 Central Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I lived in a "communist" coutry pre-1989 and although this was definitely "totalitarism-lite", I remember it wasn't funny. But if you didn't try to "overthrow" the system, you had great chances that everything was be fine and the life was pretty normal.

    I don't know that much about China but I suspect that all totalitarian regimes have a lot in common so my advice is that if you have or read prohibited materials, you probably won't be bothered. But of you try to distribute them, you are getting into trouble. And remeber that in totalitarian country everybody can spy on you.

  149. Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Cr0w+T.+Trollbot · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "The United States and other western countries all have very incompatable world views when it comes countries like China."

    Freedom is not an incompatable world view.

    Democracy is not an incompatable world view.

    Human rights are not an incompatable world view.

    Equality under the law is not an incompatable world view.

    All of these are basic rights for all human beings. The fact that the Communist government of China has refused to recognize them is not due to "an incompatable world view," its due to a small nomenklatura of Communist elites denying these rights to their people. The ideas themselves are no more alien to China than they were alien to Japan in 1945.

    - Crow T. Trollbot

    1. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by DrSkwid · · Score: 4, Insightful


      The only right you are born with is death.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Bake · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's something I've been wondering for the past few years.

      When on earth will people learn that no matter HOW GOOD your intensions are; the only thing that simply CAN NOT be stuffed down people's throat, is freedom and the concept of freedom.

      You can not force people to be free, they can only be free if they really want to be free.

    3. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, someone missed the Age of Enlightenment!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It should be pointed out that those in the US, and probably every other country in the world also have some freedoms restricted. It's just that everyone
      has a different idea of what freedoms are okay to restrict. Mentioning any of these restrictions would probably be considered flame bait, or off-topic, so I won't.

    5. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree with points 1, 3 and 4. The third one, though - what on earth gives you the idea that democracy is a "basic right"? It's a governmental system - one never implemented in the real world, at that! Democracy seems wonderful to us, but it's certainly not the only way to do things. Other major ways to organize "nations" (or companies, or any other organization really) are:

      -Despotism - Not so good. There can - and have - been good despots, though I can't think of any. Typically a despot creates something, and maintains direct control over it.

      - Monarchy - Again, not so good. This time the right to rule is typically passed down to people. Under a good (or powerless) ruler, the nation can thrive (see modern-day britain - you did know they had a queen, right?); under a bad one the nation can suffer.

      - Oligarchy - This one isn't really any better than the others, save that it allows for more inter-government wrangling than others. A good example is the UN.

      - Republic - This is the best we've gotten. The United States is the most democratic republic in the world; unfortunately, it's also the most oligarchal republic in the world. Incidentally, almost every company and other organization falls under the categories of Oligarchal republic or republican oligarchy; the only major exception that I can think of is in the open source world, which is mostly controlled by good despots like Linus Torvalds. (The main kernel is under his control, but he will allow forks.)

    6. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Atzanteol · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow man. That's like... Deep and stuff.

      Puff another one and get back to gym before they realize you didn't go to the nurse.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    7. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ideas themselves are no more alien to China than they were alien to Japan in 1945.

      Funny thing is that in 1945 China was a democracy.

    8. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      In that case, let's go ahead and exercise YOUR only human right.

      Suddenly, that idea starts to seem a little silly, doesn't it?

      p

    9. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by SuperBigGulp · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The only right you are born with is death.

      ...and sometimes not even that. IIRC there have been mixed judicial opinions on "right to die" cases, although the most current SCOTUS seemed to side with this in the Florida case.

      I believe there are cases either pending or on appeal that deal with "death with dignity" cases.

      --
      Someday a Slashdot ID of 177180 will mean something.
    10. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Ioldanach · · Score: 5, Insightful
      In the US we take these as a given. I've encountered people where I work that are from other countries that truly do not comprehend the value of freedom and democracy. I'll grant the latter 2, human rights and equal application of the law.

      However, while I may grant that everyone understands there are basic human rights, the definitions of those rights are cultural, and therefore the point there is moot. The mere existence of human rights cannot be the basis of an argument that another country doesn't have them. You can merely say they don't share our assumption of basic human rights.

      As far as equal application of the law, I'll grant that pretty much every culture expects this, it just happens that there are always a few at high levels who can circumvent it, and it falls to the culture to police this. So I don't think the chinese people as a whole have this problem, though the government certainly does.

      Now we get to freedom and democracy. You and I take as a given our freedom and the democracy. (ok, this country has an elected republic, not a democracy, but the word will do for now) However, in other cultures, the need for cultural and societal stability outweighs many personal freedoms. From everything I've seen, the culture of China rejects personal freedoms along these lines, though the government does indeed go too far in my opinion in enforcing this mindset.

      Simply put, you're making assertions that require serious work to defend, and you have to understand the cultural background of the people you need to defend your assertions against.

      Can you truly express why your first two assertions are accurate, and justify them to a culture not founded on them?

    11. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funniest post I've seen today.

    12. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Espectr0 · · Score: 0

      The only right you are born with is death.

      I see that you are not catholic.

    13. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

      This may be a strange concept to you, but for many people in the world, freedom and democracy are not their top priorities. Often, security and prosperity trump it.

      I have a friend from Peru; I've talked with her a fair bit about what it was like growing up; she mentioned that her favorite leader was Fujimori.

      When I tell this to Americans who know anything about Peruvian politics, they seem shocked. "He was a dictator!". "Paramilitary forces killed 25 people under his orders, and Peru wants him extradited for trial!". Etc. They wonder why a person who lived in Peru could possibly have liked him.

      However, things in Peru really improved when he was in charge, in her view. From here on, I'm going to cite from memory of what she's told me, so (note to the people of Peru:) if I make any errors, pleae correct me.

      Before he took over, rebel groups used to roam the countryside and force people into serving for them; she referred to them as terrorists. Fujimori, through a strict military crackdown, hunted them down and basically drove them out of existance. They used to escape to the college campuses; colleges used to be "no-go zones" for the military; he ignored this, and pursued them into the colleges (causing some riots, which they put down). Several rebel captives were publicly displayed as an example. While a repressive means was used, a group that used to pretty much terrorize many people in the countryside was pretty much driven out of existance. As she grew up in a small town in the countryside, this was important to her.

      Then there's the drug lords. The drug lords used to call "strikes" if there were policies that they didn't like. What a strike means is that if you go to work when they've called one, they'll have you shot. They tried this when Fujimori was in power. He took the military and brought it into the cities, and appeared on television downtown, out in the open, daring them to shoot him. He then had the military transport anyone who was afraid to travel to work in armored vehicles. Some people were mad at him for bringing the military into the cities... but the strike did fail as a result.

      Then there was the corruption. Before Fujimori, there were a lot of government-aided monopolies, and a lot of kickbacks. Not only did this result in public money going to help enrich those who were already rich (and private money going to keep those people in power), but it directly impacted many people. For example, products were often "bundled" with less popular products; you might not be able to get some item that you need without having to buy a bar of soap with it, or whatnot (so everyone would end up with way too much soap). Since there were no competing companies for many products, people didn't have a choice.

      Etc. In short, she was glad to trade some freedoms that she didn't personally care much about for safety and prosperity. I know the quote... but in this case, things worked out well, in her opinion. Not everyone prizes having every last personal freedom and having a democracy over everything else... and it's a bit haughty to think that they should have your views.

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
    14. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freedom is not an incompatable world view.

      No, freedom is defined differently all over. Realistically, you got the freedom to do anything, but legally every country defines limitations, even the US. You might think your view is better, but you got to remember, that it is YOUR view. Most Chinese are quite happy with their world, and they have every right to live that way w/o others imposing their view on them.

      Democracy is not an incompatable world view.

      Not really. In the old days, most governments had kings and queens. Many still do. They would look at democracy as weird as we do their form of leadership organization. And there is nothing wrong with their setup as long as you got a really good ruler. That form of government actually existed for millennias. So from one view, it is democracy that is young and still has to prove itself.

      Human rights are not an incompatable world view.

      I think I can agree with this one. But, there is much fuzzyness when it comes to treatment of criminals and other leeches on society.

      Equality under the law is not an incompatable world view.

      I can agree with equality irrelavant of birth. Most seem to disagree on origin, sex, and religion. Even we disagree on social conduct (criminals are treated differently).

    15. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not neccesarily. A right is something that is guaranteed. How can you possibly guarantee anything other than death? You could say that we are priviledged/lucky to do many other things besides die, but to say it is silly is to neglect the fact that at any future instance you could kick the bucket. Your Country, Your 'freedoms', nor your Tinfoil Hat will protect you from this possiblity by guaranteeing otherwise. =)

    16. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by TheOneBiscuit · · Score: 1

      There is also the horrific abuse to the peaceful practitioners of falun gong.
      The Chinese government are evil creatures.
      For more info:

      http://www.faluninfo.net/

      I would personally suggest you do not break any of their laws, whether just or unjest. You must remember that you will not be afforded the same rights as here if caught. It is not worth it.

      --
      Things are good
    17. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
      The only thing we are born with is flesh and the potential of that flesh.

      Objectively, you are born with nothing but the certainty of death, not the right to death. Rights are an abstraction, they are concepts societies create to define morality and ethics and what individuals should expect in terms of treatment from other individuals and society as a whole. Some rights are much more rational than others, but they are not things that exist without the context of society or individual expections of treatment by other individuals. In other words, they are artifacts of our minds.

      The concept of "rights" belongs in philosophy and applied philosophy (i.e., political science, ethics, etc). However, the nature of thinking beings is to be able to make decisions, and we must all make decisions on what is and is not acceptable behavior from those we share the world with. Individual freedoms assumed to be absolute values in the west may not be accepted as truths in China, but that doesn't mean both points of view are rational. Both could be, neither could be, or only one of them could be.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    18. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by dhasenan · · Score: 1
      Freedom? What definition of freedom? Nobody in the western world would disagree on principle, but we might not agree with the implementation.

      And what rights? Who determines that? Who has the right to ennumerate my rights?

      If you value democracy, why not poll the world, or at least a representative sample thereof, and ask what, specifically, they think they should be entitled to? Freedom is often dangerous, and its dangers increase rapidly when you add more independent operators who each have their own freedoms.

      I don't know, it seems like people are pretty quick to support a new dictator who promises a bit more security or sustenance. Merkians have been convinced that personal liberty is the only way, or at least the best way, to achieve this: "Those that would sacrifice a little liberty for security deserve neither" is the prevailing mantra. Yet we're not willing to touch the PATRIOT Act because (at least some of us think that) it might help the government beat terrorists.

      But before suggesting that all humans have basic rights, try asking them about it. Western culture is perhaps more fixated on the idea of a single life per person, with each individual having importance; other cultures may be more community-oriented and prepared to sacrifice their liberties for the good of the group.

    19. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by ThousandStars · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This may be a strange concept to you, but for many people in the world, freedom and democracy are not their top priorities. Often, security and prosperity trump it.

      The problem with your implication is that, over the long term, security and prosperity are inextricably linked with freedom and democracy. Western Europe had to learn this the hard way, and it took centuries to implement democratic frameworks, which most scholars think began with the Magna Carta in the thirteenth century. Those structures didn't become entrenched throughout Europe until after World War II, and only spread to eastern Europe following the end of the Cold War. The point is that the Western world has had a lot of practice and a lot of backsliding that led to lots of nasty wars, abuses of power and egotism.

      Over the short term, some countries may experience a marginally better quality of life due to a government's unwillingness to to respect human rights. Over the long term, however, that kind of government inevitably creates more problems than it solves. See the Soviet Union for a large example. See places like the Balkans or Iraq for smaller ones.

      If Peru had adopted and maintained democratic institutions a century ago, your friend would be much better off today. Instead, people opt or are forced into short term, "temporary" structures in which the government has more power than it should. Then that power is misused. It happened in ancient Rome -- a "tyrant" (before the word gained a pejorative connotation) would seize power during an emergency and then relinquish it. Until someone didn't want to. The point is that real benefits, materialistic and otherwise, come from a free people. It's only a fool's choice to offer security or freedom, because the two can't be fundamentally separated.

    20. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because "incompatable" is not a real word.

    21. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      Democracy IS an incompatible world view
      The western conception of what entails "freedom" IS an incompatible world view.

      As for rights... Where do they come from? Who defines what a "right" is vs. a priveledge?

      Is it my right to murder someone? no. Is it my right to drink to excess? In this country, yes. In Saudi Arabia, no.

      Is it my right to publish something criticizing the government? In this country, yes. In China, no.

      The debate of what constitutes a "right" vs. a priveledge granted by the authorities is not unlike any debate on ethics, muddled, with a bunch of incompatible world views competing for centre stage.

    22. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      When on earth will people learn that no matter HOW GOOD your intensions are; the only thing that simply CAN NOT be stuffed down people's throat, is freedom and the concept of freedom.

      When on Earth will you learn that people who live under tyranny don't share the views of their tyrants on the subject of freedom?

      You can shove it down people's throats, because the majority of them want it. What you're really doing is shoving it down their governments' throats.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    23. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by bheading · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the US we take these as a given. I've encountered people where I work that are from other countries that truly do not comprehend the value of freedom and democracy

      Actually in the US you don't take these as given, and I've encountered plenty of Americans who do not comprehend the value of freedom and democracy. These are the Americans who voted for Bush, who can't see the problems with the Patriot Act or the war on Iraq, and who really believe that the Department of Homeland Security and it's powers are there to make them safer by taking away their freedoms and regulating their liberty. These are people who ignored the founding fathers who made their famous comments about the perils of trading freedom for security. Don't get me wrong, I think the USA is a great country with many great people, But I'm afraid that a majority of those who voted there are under the misapprehension that what their government is doing and the way their country is run constitutes a free society.

    24. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was in Honduras, I heard similar reminiscences about the rule of Tiburcio Carias. He was a military dictator, he killed people he didn't like -- and the average person could wander around the countryside with a bag of cash, sleep out in any field, and be sure they would still have their money when they woke up.

    25. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Khomar · · Score: 1
      Monarchy - Again, not so good.

      Absolutely incorrect. The absolute best government system in our world (given its flaws) is a benevolent monarchy. It is by far more effecient than the Republic and can cause a great amount of good in a very short period of time.

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    26. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by narcolepticjim · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't forget Democracy -- sure, your war weariness increases, and you don't have nearly the control over diplomacy as with the other modes, but the economy boost makes it worthwhile if you have enough cities built. And if your civilization is Religious, you don't have to go through a period of anarchy to switch over.

      Personally, though, I always choose Commercial and Industrious, which means I'm either the lowly French or the Carthaginians.

    27. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by nml · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Freedom is not an incompatable world view.

      Democracy is not an incompatable world view.

      thats a very nice speech, but you've managed to miss the point in the same way as the original submitter. YOU (unless you're a citizen of china, which i doubt) are not in a position to tell China what rights to grant its citizens. Its blatantly obvious that they don't think democracy is a basic human right, since they have an at-best quasi-elected government. 'Freedom' doesn't even have any meaning without context - freedom to what? Even in countries that place high value on individual rights, like the US, there's tension between the rights of the individual and the rights of the larger society.

      The ideas themselves are no more alien to China...

      its very arrogant to suggest that your ideas are the only true beliefs and that those that don't follow them need to be liberated. And try not to speak on behalf of more than a billion people next time, OK?

    28. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by mrdaveb · · Score: 1

      Death is a right? Cool. Do you think it would be OK if I choose not to exercise that right?

      --
      Homme petit d'homme petit, s'attend, n'avale
    29. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Bluetrust25 · · Score: 1

      Ugh. Your opinion is immature and ill-informed. Take a sociology class sometime.

    30. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by john+bigbootay · · Score: 1

      you're born with the rigth to die....AND suffer.

    31. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by detect · · Score: 5, Informative
      Um, yeah maybe you forgot about a little place called Guantanamo Bay. If you think China is bad you obviously do not know about the following:


      Degrading torture on Habib: lawyer
      By Tamara McLean and Brendan Nicholson
      January 27, 2005

      The lawyer for Australian Guantanamo Bay detainee Mamdouh Habib has outlined an extraordinary series of torture methods that he says were used against his client by the United States.

      Steven Hopper said that Mr Habib was tied to the ground while a prostitute menstruated on him after he failed to co-operate with interrogators.

      Mr Habib is due back in Australia within a week after the US said it would release him without charge. The US has held him for more than three years on suspicion he knew about the September 11, 2001, attacks on the US and trained with al-Qaeda.

      Mr Hopper made the claims at an Australia Day forum in Sydney focusing on Australia's political relationship with the US.

      "Make no doubt about it, Guantanamo Bay wasn't a prisoner-of-war camp," Mr Hopper said. "It was a facility designed to interrogate people. It was nothing more than a vulgar concentration camp and it has marked a new high in the rise of American fascism."

      Mr Hopper said the Americans used prostitutes as "tools". "They'd say to detainees 'If you co-operate with us, we'll let you at this woman for the night'. And if they wouldn't agree they'd use them in other ways."

      According to British detainees held with Mr Habib and since released, "one of the prostitutes stood over him naked while he was strapped to the floor and menstruated on him".

      Mr Hopper told The Age last night that interrogators also defaced photographs of his four children that had been sent to him by his wife Maha. He said they superimposed the heads from the photographs on the bodies of animals offensive to Muslims, such as pigs.

      These were enlarged and put on the wall of the interrogation room. "They held up a picture of Maha and said 'It's a shame we had to kill your family'," Mr Hopper told the forum.

      He said Mr Habib said he was subjected to interrogation techniques at Guantanamo Bay similar to those used on prisoners at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison.

      A spokesman for Attorney-General Philip Ruddock said the Federal Government was aware of similar allegations of torture made by former British detainees at Guantanamo Bay.

      "We haven't heard those sorts of allegations from Mr Habib," he said. "But if he's got any evidence to support those sorts of claims we'd pass them on."

      Mr Habib was detained in Afghanistan in late 2001 and sent to Egypt before being flown to Guantanamo Bay in 2002.

      Mr Hopper also detailed alleged abuses against Mr Habib in Egypt, saying he was strapped to the ceiling with only an electrified barrel to stand on.

      "On other occasions they used German shepherd guard dogs and (interrogators) told him they train dogs to sexually assault people," the lawyer said. But he said Mr Habib said he was not sexually assaulted by the dogs. "Who would admit to it, particularly an Arab Muslim male?"

      The Government said it would charter a jet to fly Mr Habib back from Cuba. He will be free to go home.
      --
      // The fastest Alt-Tab in the West
    32. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Zenzilla · · Score: 1

      Freedom is not an incompatable world view.

      I am not free to smoke marijuana.

      Democracy is not an incompatable world view.

      I do not have a vote that counts for the election of the leader of my country.

      Human rights are not an incompatable world view.

      It is a human right not to be tortured.

      Equality under the law is not an incompatable world view.

      Right now men and women are not held equal under the law. The supreme court has ruled in the past that all the rights of the constitution apply only to men and no case has come up to change this.

    33. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Epistax · · Score: 1

      Freedom is not an incompatable world view.
      What's more important? Freedom or rights? Do I have the freedom to kill people. or do people have the right to live? May I yell "fire" in a crowded area? No, you have the freedom to act in a good manner. That is dependent on culture, so it is different from place to place.

      Democracy is not an incompatable world view.
      Woah! Calling democracy a right is very strange indeed. Democracy is one process, versus many others. It's like saying $5 medium pizzas on Mondays is a right. There may or may not be a best governmental system, but I can assure you that if there is, it isn't democracy. Is the best system representative? Probably. Just because it's your system doesn't make it right, just like how one religion being yours also doesn't make it right.

      Human rights are not an incompatable world view.
      Equality under the law is not an incompatable world view.

      Second sentence, yes I agree completely. The first one is a little shady as it is mixed with the very first one about. I consider a great many things to be human rights violations which other people do not, such as capital punishment. I believe the right to live cannot ever be removed by anyone other than themselves (and not inferred to be removed by other actions, that is, murder, threat of murder, etc). Thus, my views are incompatible with others.

    34. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Apro+im · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Almost (I say almost because I'm sure somebody will have a counter-example, but I can't think of any) every stable democracy resulted from an internal revolution. There may have been external pressures, but very rarely did the outsiders incite or run the revolution. (Lafayette, of course, trained American revolutionaries, but only after they asked.)

      Until the majority of them want it enough to fight for it, forcing it upon them usually doesn't work - people are comfortable where they are.

    35. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Dire+Bonobo · · Score: 1
      > over the long term, security and prosperity are inextricably linked with freedom and democracy.

      Can you back that up, or is that just an article of faith?

      Without providing compelling evidence of your assumption, your entire argument is nothing more than a statement of your opinion.

      (I'm not saying you're not right, just that you haven't provided any reason to believe you are.)

    36. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Freedom is not an incompatable world view.
      Democracy is not an incompatable world view.
      Human rights are not an incompatable world view.
      Equality under the law is not an incompatable world view.
      All of these are basic rights for all human beings.


      Then nobody anywhere in the world is free. The USA is free-er than China, but the USA is not, by your definitions, a free country.

      Freedom, a basic human right? But we all accept that there are circumstances in which it's okay to infringe that right. Most people agree it's okay to deprive criminals of it. But both China and the USA deprive people of it in questionable circumstances: China imprisons people for life for criticising the government, some parts of the USA imprison people for life for being caught stealing cookies three times.

      Democracy, a basic human right? But nowhere in the world is there a fully democratic government to be found. China's is awful. The USA's is as good as any. But "as good as any" means it's a semi-democratic plutocracy.

      Human rights themselves, basic? Nice idea, but nobody agrees which ones! For example, in a handful of countries - notably China, Iran, and the USA - the death penalty is not considered a violation of human rights. In the rest of the world, it is considered a barbaric punishment that has no place in a modern society. Oh my, who do we believe? It all looked so simple a moment ago!

      Equality under the law, a basic right for all human beings? Tell that to the government of... yep, you got it, the USA. Which does NOT extend the same rights to foreign nationals on trial in the USA as are enjoyed by US citizens. Indeed, look at... I think you're probably ahead of me here... look at Guantanamo Bay. Looks like the US government believes it's okay to detain some people indefinitely without charge or trial (foreigners), but not others (US citizens). Does that sound like equality under the law for all human beings? Not to me. Thank God the Supreme Court has had enough moral courage to object in this particular case. Not that it seems to have changed anything.

      So, what do we see? Your naive buzzwords are fine principles in theory, but your own government does not implement them. I don't quite see how you can criticise China's human rights failures when your own government is not perfect.

      And, in any case, you have not demonstrated why you think these rights even exist.

    37. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

      Right now men and women are not held equal under the law. The supreme court has ruled in the past that all the rights of the constitution apply only to men and no case has come up to change this.

      Well that was a pretty insipid response until your last line there - what in the fuck are you talking about with that? That doesn't make any sense at all.

    38. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by chochos · · Score: 1

      I went to Peru a couple of times when Fujimori was in charged. My father lived in Lima for two years during that period. you could see soldiers in the streets, but that's kind of common in some countries in Central and South America. My father talked a lot with his peruvian coworkers about the situation in Peru before and during Fujimori. A lot of people like him. Yes, he was a populist (used to go a lot to small indigenous communities dressed with regional clothing, making half-gifts to the community that later turned out to be useless, etc); yes, he was very strict with the drug and terrorist issues (some of which were very delicate; the Tupac Amaru movement was supposed to be like the Zapatist movement here in Mexico, except that Tupac Amaru used to blow up stuff in the city, lots of car bombs and such). He got rid of them. So naturally some people were upset because it was seen as a dictatorial action, but most people were happy that they could now go out with their families without fear of getting killed in a mall or restaurant. So yeah, people didnt' have the freedom to maybe wander around in certain areas that were protected by the military, but in general the country was safer, I think. Problem is, at the end Fujimori didn't want to step down and cheated on the elections, and that's not good. I think people didn't want to look the other way just because he made the country better, and that was good.

    39. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is because while you have the right to die, you do not have the right to control how you die.

    40. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Monty · · Score: 1

      So from one view, it is democracy that is young and still has to prove itself.

      Another way of looking at this is that corruption and abuse of power is universal in whatever form of government you have. We hope that modern forms of democracy help to keep it in check, but there are cases where it really fares no better than say, a monarchy. Consider the scandal and corruption surrounding the current Canadian government, for example. What's more is that democracy's the "power of the people", but if the people are either complacent or apathetic, then really it might as well be a monarch in power.

      There's something ironic about wanting to spread democracy in other lands when in our own, 30 to 40% of us won't even bother showing up to the polls....

    41. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by PrivateDonut · · Score: 0
    42. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Crampz · · Score: 1

      Freedom truely exists where? Democracy? Sorry, I live in a republic that claims democracy. Human rights? The only rights you have are those granted by your immediate community. You are "entitled" to nothing. "Equality" is also a farce. I'm bigger, smarter, and make more money than my brother. I'm more succesful, have better health, and a happier life. He was born stupid, I wasn't. How's that for equality?

    43. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Almost (I say almost because I'm sure somebody will have a counter-example, but I can't think of any) every stable democracy resulted from an internal revolution.

      Which revolution installed a stable democracy in Britain?

      ("The English Civil War" is not the correct answer: that installed a republic that was neither more nor less democratic than the monarchy it replaced, lasted only a short time, and had no major consequences for the system of government of the country.)

    44. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by MicktheMech · · Score: 1

      Almost (I say almost because I'm sure somebody will have a counter-example, but I can't think of any)...

      Canada

    45. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Malfourmed · · Score: 1
      In short, she was glad to trade some freedoms that she didn't personally care much about for safety and prosperity.

      She's not the only one, as supporters of the PATRIOT Act demonstrate.

      That said, I think your friend has a perfectly valid opinion. There's something to be said for the concept of a Maslowesque "hierarchy of needs" which has physical safety and a level of economic security as a prerequisite for more intangible freedoms such as democracy.

      The difference being, in the United States, even after 9/11, physical safety and prosperity are already at such a high standard that incursions such as the more extreme PATRIOT measures are not justified.
    46. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll learn it when you stuff it down their throats. Be careful though, some of them will put up a fight.

    47. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by gblues · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Don't get me wrong, I think the USA is a great country with many great people, But I'm afraid that a majority of those who voted there are under the misapprehension that what their government is doing and the way their country is run constitutes a free society.

      (emphasis mine)

      I'm assuming you are not a United States citizen based on your choice of words here. Civics 101: laws are drafted and then passed around the Senate and the House of Representatives. Only after both groups have approved the bill does it get sent to the President to be signed into law. This means that the PATRIOT act did not pass due to GWB. The PATRIOT act passed because a majority in the House and Senate thought it was a good idea, and the President agreed.

      It would seem that I understand my freedoms and democracy better than you. Oh, and I voted for Bush, too. I guess I shouldn't exist according to your logic.

    48. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Shihar · · Score: 1

      Poster One
      I don't like mod system on slashdot.

      Poster Two
      The mod system is exactly like Bush! It eats babies!

      Jesus, can we get through a post without finding a way to make every single post a flamebait about Bush? Who rates this flamebate informative? For fucks sake. I can't wait for the guy to fucking leave office just so that I can go a few minutes without reading a post in some totally unrelated subject crying about him. Think of what a reduced post count each article would have if Kerry had won.

    49. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A revolution obviously took place it's just that it took place with very little bloodshed and over a long period of time because both the people and the rulers largely agreed moving towards democracy was a good thing. The rulers and the people probably went through phases of being more or less enthusiastic about the whole thing but it seems to have worked out all right in the end.

      The point is that the decision to become a democracy was made internally and achieved by the hard work and negotiations between the people and the monarchy.

    50. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by sylvandb · · Score: 1

      I've encountered plenty of Americans who do not comprehend the value of freedom and democracy. These are the Americans who voted for Bush...

      Kerry and Bush would both take us toward a totalitarian state, the only difference is the road they take to get there. There was NO choice of destination, and very little choice of velocity.

      Instead of voting for Bush, what did you do (or would you have done if you had been a citizen)?

      If there had been a viable candidate who was offering some other destination for the country you might have a point. But there wasn't. Trying to blame Bush voters for preferring one path over another to the same destination is asinine.

      And if you truly believe the two had differing long-term objectives, you are a fool that any president in the past 20 years would be proud of.

      sdb

    51. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Daktaklakpak · · Score: 1

      For example, products were often "bundled" with less popular products; you might not be able to get some item that you need without having to buy a bar of soap with it, or whatnot (so everyone would end up with way too much soap).

      I didn't know Microsoft made soap!

    52. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Read+Icculus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Redefine revolution and all the square pegs fit nicely into place!

      --
      Anti-social? My code is just platform-specific.
    53. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what happens in places like China when you want freedom? You get throw in jail and your family suffers. You most likely die in the long run.

      We're not "forcing" freedom on anyone. They want it but guess what happens if they speak up or say anything the government doesn't want them to? The die. Same thing happened in Russia. I wonder if people seriously by the junk people were saying to them just to stay out of trouble. Its plain and simple doublethink, saying one thing to stay out of harms way while harboring an innner hatred for the government. And we all know what happened to Winston.

    54. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Have history teaching standards dropped so low that they don't teach about WW2 any more?

      Two counter-examples that immediately spring to mind are Japan and West Germany (post-WW2).

    55. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by jgardn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It sounds like Fujimori APPRECIATED people's freedom, and fought viciously to protect it.

      The reason why they want Fujimori seems to be because those people he actively pursued and challenged are upset and want revenge.

      There's a difference between ordering your military to restore order and ordering your military to oppress. If there is a riot in downtown Seattle, I expect the military to come through and clear the streets and remove the rioters, using WHATEVER FORCE IS NECESSARY. No one has the right to obstruct my right to travel freely in the US.

      --
      The radical sect of Islam would either see you dead or "reverted" to Islam.
    56. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by MurphyZero · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except that the military are not allowed to do that (by law) You'll have to rely on police (or National Guard under the governor's power)

      --
      Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.
    57. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by ShayUK · · Score: 1

      I agree with all but democracy. It isn't the end all be all of political models, as is often seen in the US election cycle. Perhaps democracy at its best is a good concept, but then, so is Communism.

      I can't say I know what democracy needs to be replaced with, but the rule of the majority is causing a big mess when the majority doesn't know what it actually wants nor what it has actually voted for.

    58. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      It's not really a redefinition, a revolution in this context is simply "a drastic and far-reaching change in ways of thinking and behaving" and is also applied to events such as the Industrial Revolution.



      The transition from rule by an absolute monarch through divine right to rule by an elected parliment is definitley a drastic and far reaching change, revolutions don't necessarily have to involve bloodshed and fighting.


    59. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Zemran · · Score: 1

      Good troll but not enough people bit. You missed out the right to live in peace and I think that would include not getting shot in a drive by, a right they enjoy far more in China. Most Chinese think their democracy is more effective than ours. While I was there I found it surprising how much they thought that their lives were better and that was not through lack of information. Most people here would benefit from a year in China but they would have to learn respect for other peoples culture first.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    60. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gratuitous unattributed plagiarism:

      Democracy

      • To a Greek in ancient Athens, it meant the direct participation in government by citizens of the polis
      • To an American, it means the election of representatives who will (ostensibly) govern them according to the best interests of the people
      • To a Soviet diplomatic speaking at an American university, it meant the right of the people to vote for or against the candidate put forth by the Party
    61. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calling Fujimori a dictator is sort of an exageration actually... He did receive the popular vote in open elections whenever they were held, and even remains the most popular presidential candidate to this day! He *did seize* near-dictatorial powers (he was sharing power with the military) and dissolved the (absolutely compromised and corrupted by the country's terrorists) legislative and judicial bodies... But eventually he reformed the (now laregly reformed) normal governmental bodies, and ceded the emergency powers that he had seized for a time. The reason that people call him a dictator are two-fold:

      1. When Fujimori took office Peru had a presidential term limit in effect. After he reinstated the normal functions of the government and constitution, in order to be eligable to continue to rule Fujimori convinced the Legislature twice to roll back the term limits to allow his further presidential bids. I was in Peru when Fujimori was president (specifically during the time that Tupac Amaru stormed and held the Japanese Embassy), and make no mistake, the people supported him widely! They were however becoming increasingly suspiscious of him due to the changing of the constitution to suit his own needs. But due to the massive and noticeable improvements that Fujimori made over the previous - Maoist/Marxist terrorist linked - administration they were still content to put up with even that... though patience was thinning.

      2. He was a strong and fairly right-wing leader, so his hardline tactics against terrorists and willingness to root out corruption and terrorist ties (often linked with the country's Communist movement) within the universities, local and national governments made this the most easy - if undeserved - slur to throw at him. Very similar in a way to Rudy Guiliani... A very popular leader who made massive improvements to a place that sorely needed them by being very hardnosed in precisely the places that were LONG overdue for such treatment. Rudy had VERY similar slurs bandied about in respect to him before 9-11 as well (and still now, though only by a tiny fringe for the most part), and Guiliani was certainly no dictator!

      In the end, Fujimori was the right leader at the right time, but he overstayed his welcome. In addition, although he did MUCH to clean up the corruption in the Peruvian governemt, new corruption sprung up as well during his administration as well. Less of it, to be sure, but new corruption nonetheless. Most of it seems to have centered around the Peruvian intelligence chief of the time, Vladimiro Montesinos. Though how much Fujimori was actually involved in it, is not certain... It also may well be that Fujimori was in reality only aware of *some* of the activities that Montesinos was engaged in... That is hard to say, and a judgement that I'll leave up to the experts.

      But if "Paramilitary forces killed 25 people under his orders" is the most stinging charge that the critics you've heard against Fujimori, you may want to weigh that against the 30,000 victims that have been killed by the Maoist/Marxist terrorist organizations that Fujimori (supposedly, although it easily could have been Montesinos' own initiative) killed those 25 while combating! Nevermind ending the long standing disputes between Peru and Ecuador to the north and Chile to the south...

      Not saying he was a saint... I don't really think that he was anywhere close to one, though he certainly did much good for his country. But to call him a dictator is simply innacurate!

      ***That aside... On your larger point I agree, but only in the short term. People expect (reasonably I would say) that such tradeoffs be limited in timeframe. Unrest is sown when such tradeoffs are made permenant.

      As an example... When Communist terrosists were at their worst in Peru, Fujimori needed to temporarily dissolve the judicial and legislative bodies which had become riddled with people who were both corrupt and people who had been compromised by the Communist terrorist movements that were terrorizi

    62. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coming from Greece, supposed to be the very country where the concept of democracry was born, it makes me lough hard American's view of "Democracy". Let me share with you a secret: You don't have Democracy. Had I to choose between the, admittedly, restrictive regime of China and your "Democratically democracy exporting government", I'd rather pick the first.

      At least, I'd have the crimes contained within my borders, instead of assuming that everybody else would be glad to accept my moronisms. Yours, Fotis

    63. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in China!

    64. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      In the cases you are listing, China and America have identical world views.

      The American government just has better PR (public relations). Of course, we don't know exactly how the Chinese sell their totalitarianism to their citizens. Instead of any Great Walls or Firewalls, the US built the Great Amount of Ignorance and Arrogance in all their citizens, so we are too occupied with Must See TV and our social/professional lives. And on that same note, they never did a Friends episode in China, but if they had, I'm sure we would have gotten a completely unbiased, ethno-friendly peek into their culture, don't you?

      I think the context in which the phrase "incompatible world views" was used had more to do with "how the citizens viewed the world" and less to do with "what the government oppresses onto their citizens".

      Americans are so quick to condemn the Chinese, or any other, way of life, rather than take a good look at their own. Citizens of the United States do not realize how often we are censored, or how the structure of the system provides us with our limited "freedom of speech". Through the privatization of media, someone can say whatever they want (to an extent) and it doesn't matter, because no one can ever hear them.

      Besides, when anyone does happen to be within "earshot", the government will just call it a "Conspiracy Theory" or a lie and a well-programmed populace will then disregard it. Then they throw out a bunch of ludicrous "theories" to water down the truth and confuse anyone looking for answers. Nearly everything TV or school teaches you is wrong. Of course, China does the same things to their citizens. Honestly, I think they put the Great Firewall into place to not only stop the truth from reaching their citizens, but to also stop the lies, too.

      It's only a matter of time before we are controlled to the same extent as the Chinese. And it will happen because we will allow it to happen. We are selling out our liberties to buy us some totalitarianism in a package labeled "Security".

      But you are right:

      Freedom is not an incompatible world view.
      Because we don't have freedom, either. "Freedom" without money, or the power to exercise it, isn't freedom. Sure, I can choose what brand of deodorant I want, but I can't speak out without being demonized, and I can't receive the education that I can definitely use. Freedom is only for the rich, not for all.

      Democracy is not an incompatible world view.
      Right again. Although it's not commonly accepted, it's the truth: Bush never won an election. Either term. And the choice of voting between one puppet and another is hardly "democracy".

      Human rights are not an incompatible world view.
      At least not with China, cause we TOTALLY agree there! With non-socialized health care, abusive police officers, and "free fire" wars like Vietnam and Iraq, not to mention torture, rocket fuel in the drinking water, and our children being fed "vegetables" like ketchup (thank Bush Sr. for that one), its obvious what we think of our fellow man. We are more concerned with an African American woman having babies to cash welfare checks than the babies that the program actually feed. Most people are so ashamed to use programs like welfare, because they will be seen as "feeding off the government". Well, we pay our taxes to spread the wealth and raise the standard of living, and whatever money we don't use for this purpose will be spent to kill poor people and make rich people richer, while they leave us with the tab.

      Equality under the law is not an incompatible world view.
      Poor men get prison for robbing a convenience store. Rich men get NOTHING for stealing millions of dollars out of their employees' 401k. Yup, that's equality under the law, if I do say so myself.

      And these ideas are no more alien to Japan than they were to us in 1945, when after a long spree of fire bombing that wiped out the majority of their major cities, we then p

    65. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would seem that I understand my freedoms and democracy better than you. Oh, and I voted for Bush, too. I guess I shouldn't exist according to your logic.

      The majority has spoken, and I found what it said to be disturbing.

    66. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Locke2005 · · Score: 1
      Didn't Tianamen demonstrate that there are a large number of people in China that really want to be free? Can you name any group of people that are currently telling their government "excuse us, but we'd like a little less freedom, please"? While getting people to understand the concept of freedom may require some education, I don't really beleive there are too many people out there that are opposed to freedom.

      This, of course, means you use the word "freedom" as defined in the dictionary; when Bush uses the word "freedom", he appears to be assigning a somewhat different meaning to the word...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    67. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      "You can shove it down people's throats, because the majority of them want it."

      If you rephrase that a little you get

      "You CAN shove your genitals down womans throats without permission, because the majority of them want it."

      If the people of china wanted their government to give them more freedoms, there would be a civil war.

    68. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by pla · · Score: 1

      The problem with your implication is that, over the long term, security and prosperity are inextricably linked with freedom and democracy.

      Er... No. Cute idealistic philosophy, but about as incorrect as you can possibly get.

      They have nothing to do with one another.

      The most secure and prosperous level of "freedom"? A police state.

      The most efficient government? A monarchy/dictatorship.

      The most "fair" government? Communism.


      Now, I'll bet for that last one you said, "Wait a minute, look at the former Soviet Union - Do you consider that fair???". And you have a good point, that I'll bounce right back to you. Communism works as a theory. In reality, corrup individuals rise to power and stay there, benefitting from the work of the people. Well, that applies exactly the same in a democracy. In theory, everyone has an equal voice in the government. In reality, people form cliques and power aggregates to those who join together to force their common interest on everyone else.


      Or to look at it another way, this planet has only ever seen one "true" democracy (and even that fell a bit short, since not everyone counted as a full citizen). And look at its freedom and prosperity today! What, you mean Athens doesn't count as a world superpower, having fallen to an oligarchy a few thousand years ago?

    69. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by clean_stoner · · Score: 1

      You make a good point, but in some cases the overwhelming lack of security creates a dire need for totalitarianism. Take Iraq right now as an example. If we simply left right now all hell would break loose (even more so than is already happening). In Peru they needed the crackdown before they could develop the freedoms you (and I) think are so vital. I'm not saying the oppressive regime would just give up power, they almost certainly would not have, but the social situation would not allow the development of a free society like we enjoy. So in that kind of situation, the total lack of security, the only possibilities for survival (which people need to live, they don't need freedom) is for either a strong leader to step in and impose military rule or for a foriegn power to step in, impose military rule until it is secure, and then hand power back to the people (or a puppet goverenment like America is so wont to do).

      --

      Sigs are for the weak.

    70. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: hey! I read Plato!

      We're not talking about theory here. We're talking about practice.

    71. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by pdan · · Score: 1

      Being Polish I'd like to emphasise, that ideas of democracy and freedom didn't come to the east after the Cold War. Our constitution (1791) was second in the world. The idea of personal freedom and democracy have been present in our society since sixteenth century. Try and remember what was happening in the west during that period. Russian history is also little known in the west, but Russia hasn't been always an authocratic monarchy or communist dictatorship.

    72. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by greenrd · · Score: 1
      Freedom and democracy are the checks-and-balances against truly evil and sadistic rulers. They're not perfect by any means, but they constitute the least worst political framework ever implemented.

      It may be true that some dictators can improve living conditions in many ways. But if ever someone tells you that person X would/will make a good dictator without the shackles of democratic and media accountability to tie them down, be very very suspicious. How can they possibly know that for sure? And why should we trust their judgements? What if they're wrong and the dictator turns out to be a murderous thug like Pinochet?

      That is why democracy is vitally important - to all peoples.

    73. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Caseyscrib · · Score: 4, Insightful
      When on earth will people learn that no matter HOW GOOD your intensions are; the only thing that simply CAN NOT be stuffed down people's throat, is freedom and the concept of freedom.

      Yup. One of the underlying conflicts in many of the wars (ancient Athens, WWI/WWII, Iraq, etc...) fought by civilizations was hubris. People become so patriotic that they think their country is superior to everyone else's. Some leaders have even used this arrogance to justify wars. They believe war is "good" because it tests the true strength of a civilization, and the best culture will overtake the weaker one (social darwinism). In their mind, you're doing the enemy a favor by giving them freedom, communism, or whatever. What these people fail to realize, however, is that the only reason you think you're way is better is because thats the way you were raised; to believe everything you were taught was correct and any other way is wrong or inferior. Americans like their freedom, Iraqis like their dictatorship, and Chinese like their Communism. I'm not saying they're thrilled to be told what to do, but they are complacent because they are ignorant of alternatives. If the people become oppressed enough, they will start their own revolution. If another country tries to impose their culture on them, they will become patriotic to their own government (free or not) because of propoganda their leaders tell them.

      You can not force people to be free, they can only be free if they really want to be free.

      While education and the decline of religious influence have helped dwarf rascism and taught tolerance, we're still in Iraq right now because of the same egotistical "we're the big bad fuckin USA" attitude ("Bring It On"). One day, I hope people will understand that it doesn't matter if your an American, Canadian, French, Iraqi, whatever - you're still a human being. What geographical area or political climate you were raised in will never change that.

    74. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Wow, someone missed the Age of Enlightenment!
      Well, all those who voted for Shrub aren't much more evolved than cavemen...
    75. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by frankgod · · Score: 1

      What most people fail to see is that people have different social priorities and views in different places. In the west, our general way of life has evolved to fit a democratic society. In particular, the rule of law is considered absolute in most cases. People may not respect a certain leader, but they respect the system enough to follow him.

      Luckily, Americans do not have the notion that blowing yourself up in a crowded area or kidnapping and killing people is a good way to support a political cause. If they did, then democracy would probably not work here either. "Crossfire" is just a TV show.

      The social backing that allows democracy to work takes generations to develop. If this social climate isn't there, then no amount of security force or monetary incentive will make democracy work. Sadly, the rest of the world needs to catch up in social maturity. It's going to be a long and painful process for some countries. But it will happen eventually. I'm not that old and I can't even count how many countries have converted to democracy during my lifetime. Some countries will have a blend of democracy with some other government, but others will be more revolutionary. Even the middle east will reach this point, but it's not something that can be forced.

    76. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Dire+Bonobo · · Score: 5, Insightful
      > It would seem that I understand my freedoms and democracy better than you.
      > Oh, and I voted for Bush, too. I guess I shouldn't exist according to your logic.

      Not at all; he simply disagrees with you. You believe you understand your freedoms better than he does; he believes you don't have as many freedoms as you think.

      Whether you understand the creation of a law doesn't really determine whether you understand its effect.

    77. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post smacks of political correctness. Let's stop and think about what you said.

      Ok, so the Chinese don't think democracy is a basic human right since they don't have democracy. Have you considered the possibility that political dissenters tend to disappear in China? Or get run over by tanks? Perhaps at this time life is good enough in China that they are not willing to risk prosperity by having a violent revolution. But that doesn't mean the Chinese don't value democracy.

      But what would it mean for the citizens of a country to not support democracy? Does that mean that a majority of the citizens do not want to decide the fate of their country and the decisions of their government? Because if we abstract the definition of democracy a bit, the very same citizens WOULD BE supporting democracy. There's a difference between supporting the CONCEPT of a dictatorship and supporting a SPECIFIC dictatorship; there are many that do the latter, but few that really do the former.

      To put it a third way, democracy is really about having opinions about your government and being able to act upon them. In times of economic prosperity, people tend to forget about the second part, and since everyone is happy with the government at the time, their opinions don't get put down by the government. But when things go badly, you'll see that people really do want democracy; there will be revolution, which is a rather expensive and deadly ballot box.

      Basically, I think democracy must be a natural desire of everyone; those that truly believe that they should be ordered around their whole lives have had the human spirit bred out of them, sadly. The desire to mold your destiny is simply human instict.

      My suspicion is that you are reacting to the war in Iraq; specifically, you believe that if you support the creation of democracies worldwide, then you support the war in Iraq by extension. If that's the case, then it's pretty disenginous of you.

    78. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by mrogers · · Score: 1

      I share your opinion that people should be treated equally under the law, should be allowed to speak and congregate freely, and should have the power to replace government officials in regular elections. However, thinking that this is somehow 'not a world view' is incredibly naive. Democracy and human rights are good ideas, but they're still just ideas. Treating them as mystical revealed truths does a disservice to the tradition of rational debate and mutual respect that allowed those ideas to emerge in the first place.

    79. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      And I'm curious, where are the people that go "Slavery! Yeah!"

      Who doesn't want freedom?

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    80. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know what passed the PATRIOT act. It was not the Senate, nor the house, nor was it any sort of popular vote or thought process. What passed the PATRIOT act was fear. America saw this type of internal policy time once before and it began with "I am not nor have ever been a member of the communist party" This is a situation were Americans have been presented with a choice that is on the same level as China's domestic policy: vote this way or terrible things will happen to you. The terror alert level will never drop to blue or green because the current government needs to maintain the feeling of fear within the people. This is how China operates, this is how some people in America would like this nation to operate.

      My advice to the individual traveling to China: dot your i's and cross your t's. People dissappear in systems like that and Uncle Sam will not back you up against the sleeping dragon.

      In regards to the parent to my post: I predict that if he reads this he will respond with some sort of radical denial and will accuse me of fraud. But let me close with the note that the PATRIOT act made it from bill to law in 3 days. Nobody actually reviewed it and only one person voted against it in the senate. Congratulations to senator Feingold for having the guts to stand up to intimidation.

    81. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Zak3056 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Um, yeah maybe you forgot about a little place called Guantanamo Bay. If you think China is bad you obviously do not know about the following

      I'm not going to stand up for what's happenning at Gitmo--I'm as opposed to it as you seem to be. However, I can't allow the suggestion that what is happening in Cuba somehow makes the US worse than China to go unchallenged.

      Mao used to rape twelve year old girls. His "Cultural Revolution" and "Great Leap Forward" accounted for the deaths of millions of his own citizens. When the US starts the wholesale murder of its own citizens while Dubya is raping children in the oval office, then we'll talk about "if you think china is bad..."

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    82. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "laws are drafted and then passed around the Senate and the House of Representatives. Only after both groups have approved the bill does it get sent to the President to be signed into law. This means that the PATRIOT act did not pass due to GWB. The PATRIOT act passed because a majority in the House and Senate thought it was a good idea, and the President agreed."

      Are you suggesting that the patriot act didn't come from the whitehouse? I guess I thought that after 9/11 the whitehouse said "here's the patriot act. we should do this." and the house+senate said "ok." I don't buy that GWB's administration isn't the source of the patriot act.

    83. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by AutoTheme · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... Seems that the most free country in the world is also the most prosperous. Coincidence?

    84. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "However, while I may grant that everyone understands there are basic human rights, the definitions of those rights are cultural, and therefore the point there is moot. "
      You see this is one of those things that sounds good but is totally wrong. In the world today the idea of different cultures is an old one that does not work in the modern world. Sure a 100 years ago it had some validity but with communications and modern transport it is just falls apart. No place that you can reach in a day or talk to in a minute is truly a different culture. We are rapidly heading to a mono culture. How many different "cultures" are having this discussion on Slashdot? can you even tell where they are from?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    85. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      Not quite.

      That statement, if you agree with the idea, should be re-worded as:

      The only right you are born with is the right to a long, painful death.

      A quick one is a bonus.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    86. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by mt+v2.7 · · Score: 1

      I hate hearing people say that. If you honestly think that the president doesn't have the political sway (i.e. most blatantlt veto threats on other things.) to pass or not pass almost any bill he wants you're deluding yourself in idealism.

    87. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's about right, what you'd said about communism. One small thing to remember, though, is that this applies to any governmental system that has been poorly engineered.

      Any governmental system that has no power checks or balances will inevitably suffer the presence of tyrants and power abuse.

    88. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by DemingBuiltMyHotRod · · Score: 1
      Can you name any group of people that are currently telling their government "excuse us, but we'd like a little less freedom, please"?

      Republicans.

      /Rimshot

    89. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      No. You are entirely wrong here.YOU are the one being arrogant here.

      You have drastically misunderstood his ideas. His idea of freedom is not that people in his culture should be free - it is ALL people have the RIGHT to be free. He might be wrong, but that is his idea. He believes that the Chinese people that disagree are wrong. He has the right to believe they are wrong.

      Consider a religious analogy. I am allowed to believe in one true god, and that all other gods are fake. The fact that I state my belief does not make me arrogant, even if pagans are around, that believe in many gods, one of which has the same name as my god. The Pagans may think the monotheist is arrogant, when he states the other gods don't exist, but he is NOT being arrogant, he is simply telling them what he beleives.

      You are proudly, arrogantly proclaiming your belief that he is wrong, freedom is not an actual, universal truth, it is just a cultural thing.

      Certain things are true universally. Light speed is the same regardless of what country you are in.

      Some of us, me included, believe that Freedom is a universal truth, that some people, such as those in China, and apparently you, have mistakenly thought to just be an American/Western idea.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    90. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what happens in places like China when you want freedom? You get throw in jail and your family suffers. You most likely die in the long run.

      You'd be surprised how many people can turn a blind eye to this. Witness the hundreds of thousands of people killed and tortured by Saddam, yet many people still believe it was wrong of us to remove him.

    91. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Kadmos · · Score: 1

      "Democracy is not an incompatible world view."

      Somebody please explain how democracy is a "basic human right". No, really, this isn't a troll, I really want to know... What makes you think that democracy is so fundamental to human life that we can't do without it? We die without food, water or oxygen but by no means is democracy necessary to survival, it is not even necessary to live a good, happy or worthwhile life.

      And while I'm on the subject, the declaration of human rights is certainly a noble and worthy document but I only have to consider the expanse of the universe and our "human rights" don't seem so mighty after all. Do you think the asian tsunami cares about "human rights" of life, that the US Govt. cares about "right to trial" when they kidnap people, have them exported for torture and then imprisoned for years without trial? Maybe I could tell the next world killer comet to not deny me of our right to life and it will therefore have to alter course to miss the Earth...

      Who was it that said "Civilisation is only three meals away from anarchy"?

      We live in a world where we compete for resources with other people and animals on the planet, if we really wanted to end world hunger, we could. If we really wanted to stop war, we could. If we really wanted to stop the first world relying on third world debt, we could. We (as a whole) don't really want to do that because then we couldn't afford our next shopping spree on objects we don't really want or need while some poor bastard in Africa is scratching around in the dirt trying to pay off his countries debt to the first world and can't even afford to feed his family. That's the *reality* we live in, bleat about your "human rights" and freedoms all you want, but your "freedom" and the wealth you enjoy is paid for by the rest of the world who will only be "free" when people of the "first world" let them be free.

    92. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      What are you saying? That China is somehow different than other countries? Is there some country where freedom, democracy, human rights, and equality under the law are actually put into practice, and not just a "view" or an opinion to be imposed on someone else? What exactly is the difference between the Communist elites and the old money European elites? I wish I could remember where I saw this: About the Roman Empire could be applied to European/American society, it was said that life inside the empire was great, but outside the walls was quite another story.

      --
      What?
    93. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Dreadknott · · Score: 1

      Freedom, democracy, nothing more than Michavellian words used to control the populace. You have never been free, the only true freedom is freedom from fear. The invisible people of America could teach you about the price of what you call fredom. Just go to your nearest overpass with a blanket and a bottle to keep you warm. Sit and watch all the "free" people who live there. Park at the end of a street and watch all the children scurry like rats from the schoolbus, because sexoffenders live in their neighborhoods. Walk up to a strange woman at night and watch them clutch their handbag because they fear you. Yeah, we are really free...

    94. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by scarhill · · Score: 1

      How about Japan and (West) Germany after World War II? I suppose you could argue that Germany had some experience with democracy between the wars, but democracy was imposed in Japan by the US occupation--no revolution, no democratic tradition.

    95. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Syats · · Score: 1

      Your view is defenetly that of liberalism.. whish, I'm sorry to disapoint you, is not the only, nor the best, of modern idiologies.

      The set of values in whish you base your assertions are totally originated in culture.
      For example, you belive that your personal benefit, progress and well-being are above that of your country, and therefore you vote (if you do) in accordance to your personal interests.. and I can bet that the politicians of your country take that very well into acount and offer you personal beneffits in exchange for your vote, and everyone (?) is happy about that.

      But in China, and other places of the world, that is not the general view... personal beneffits and personal growth are less important that those of the whole society, and therefore chineese (not all of them, of course) are willing to sacrifice some benefits and well-being so their country can become grater.
      This, of course, should not be blamed on communism. This phenomena has been present not only on communist states, but also in others like post-war Japan. Pre-USSR Russia also had a set of values like this one, mostly among the peasantry(90+% of the population).

      AS of whish "benefits and well-being" can be sacrificed is also completly deppendant on values; freedom of expression, as valued as it is here on /., is an invention of the liberal french bourgeoise in order to be have the same oportunities of power and buissnes as the aristrocracy. This value has survived (and expanded) to our days, and now many consider it "a basic liberty of all humans". It has indeed proven to be beneffical to the development of western countries. But so has the opposite, many countries have made great progress and have aided them selves by supressing freedom of information, and their people have recived great benefits of this progress, like first-grade free medical atention, supperior education for all, security, a car for every one (if waiting for your Lada 20 years was not a problem for you), etc.

      So as you can see, every one has the choise as to whish liberties they can sacrifice. Of course if you sacrifice your freedom of information in a capitalist state, you will rapidly end up in missery, and only a very tight elite would controll the whole of production. (ooooopsss. that is all ready happening).
      The point is, righs and liberties are valued diferently depending of the set of values of the concerned individuals.

      Of course USA, and USSR had the military and propaganda power to positively impose their value systems in other countries... but it is clear that the reason theese countries adopted those values is not beacause they tought of them as universal, but because they had a gun pointed at their heads.

      And democracy!
      democracy is the great phalacy that has costed millions of lives in the XIX & XX centuries, and has served no one but the guys with the tick wallets. let us not talk about democracy.

      --
      Go Beyond.
    96. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by LavaDevil94 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that's why some countries occasionally elect new leaders? New leaders are different, and difference means a different approach, freedom or safety in this case. Some take freedom, some take safety, some are just morons. But we occasionally get a few in a row that focus on safety, then freedom, and repeat, and that's where things start to rise, with the balance between freedom and safety.

    97. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      Be fair, now. Democrats want gun controls and forced homogenization. They just don't have the power to enforce either at the moment.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    98. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Sarge-001 · · Score: 1

      Wow, whatever you smoke must be great stuff!
      First of all, if you ARE American...you are a Republic NOT a democracy get it right. Democracy may not be an incompatable world view but a basic human right?
      Could someone plese explain to me why democracy is so farking good? All it means is that the a$$hole that steals from you...you got to vote into power. News flash, every government is corrupt and will bend you over and have its way with you be it democratic, communist, republic or monarchy. Grow up and join the real world. Its messy and then you die.
      Or I could just be having a really really shitty day... *shrug* your call.

    99. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most "fair" government? Socialism.

      Socialism != Communism. Communism was a bad idea, given human nature.

    100. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. --That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security....
      Just because a bunch of hippies wearing funny hats in 1776 said some truths were self-evident, doesn't mean that they are. If these things were really self-evident, why did it take until 1776 for them to be acted upon? The view that we have basic human rights is an incompatalbe view when taken to certain places (such as US run prisons in Iraq, or communist China).

      Us Americans have a tendency to state our beliefs as fact. Our government being founded on the idea of individual rights DOES NOT mean that these rights actually exist outside of our country.
    101. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by nml · · Score: 1

      You have drastically misunderstood his ideas. His idea of freedom is not that people in his culture should be free - it is ALL people have the RIGHT to be free. He might be wrong, but that is his idea. He believes that the Chinese people that disagree are wrong. He has the right to believe they are wrong.

      i don't think i've misunderstood him. He (She? Can i assume that 'Crow T. Trollbot' is male?) has the right to hold whatever beliefs he wants, but he suggested that they're universally applicable. I have no problems with people stating their beliefs, but arrogance starts when you suggest that other people's beliefs are wrong.

      You are proudly, arrogantly proclaiming your belief that he is wrong, freedom is not an actual, universal truth, it is just a cultural thing.

      No, i'm not. i didn't say anything about my views on 'freedom', (once again, freedom to do what?) i just pointed out that beyond things that we do hold as universal human rights, he shouldn't try to apply his personal moral standards to china when the people there clearly have different beliefs.

    102. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I don't see access to porn and surfing the Internet as inalienable human rights. At a stretch, you might say that accurate news of local and world events is a human right. I think there are some valid arguments there.

      And as for equality under the law, the Great Firewall of China -- based on what I've read, not experience -- is pretty much a blanket absolute for every place but Hong Kong.

      There's a difference between freedom and enforced cultural standards of behavior. Unless you're a member of a given culture, it can be very difficult to distinguish. Example: Talk to some folks from India. In college, I was always surprised at how many of them speak positively of arranged marriages. Now at work, co-workers sometimes come back from a two week vacation in India and they're married to a person they'd never met before, but that their family had found for them. And they're happy with it, whereas any American I know would absolutely chaffe.

      Personally, I think that the USA government is much less controlling than the Chinese government. But I've met folks from Europe who are astounded that our government controls our lives so much ("21 years old?? TO DRINK BEER?!?!").

      I say again: Unless you're a part of the culture, you're probably not qualified to judge what is oppression and what is simply cultural norm.

    103. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by mikapc · · Score: 1

      You're acting like the U.S. has reverted to martial law, yes the patriot act is potentionally troublesome but even if abused to its worst it still wouldn't make the U.S. anything near a dictatorship.

    104. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

      I'm Jewish.

      Think about that.

      Thanks.

    105. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia.

    106. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Shea_Butter · · Score: 1
      This means the PATRIOT act did not pass due to GWB. The PATRIOT act passed because a majority in the House and Senate thought it was a good idea, and the President agreed.

      Your explanation is altogether oversimplified. First of all, the President is certainly able to put pressure on the Senate and the House to get certain bills through, something I'm sure was done with regards to the Patriot Act. Next, there's the tendency of politicians to "go with the flow," for which your party has constantly criticized those on the opposite side of the aisle. Politicians want to stay in office, and "flip flop" to try and stay with the public sentiment. This also certainly happened in this case. Consider the timing of the bill. Who in the aftermath of 9/11 would vote against a bill that purports to combat terrorism? Seriously, it was called the Patriot act. What do you suppose they called people who voted against it?
    107. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      Then again, it's pretty tough to charge someone for commiting suicide ;)

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    108. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by mldqj · · Score: 1

      Mao used to rape twelve year old girls.
      What is the source of this fact (if it was indeed fact)?

    109. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      I'd say that people who voted for Bush understand the principles and value of democracy better than you do, given that you're condemning them for not voting the way you wanted them to, and they aren't cursing you for "voting the wrong way".

      If you actually cared about democracy, you'd be bowing to the will of the majority. Of course, you don't have to do so if you're in the USA, because we aren't a democracy (hint: Republic).

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    110. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by kaladorn · · Score: 1

      It does matter if you are in China or in the USA or in Canada if you are someone who has a dissenting view. In China, if you are an inconvenient Tibetan, something unfortunate might happen to you. In Canada, you will probably be granted a public soapbox. Whereas I think part of the problem in Iraq may have been a poor post-invasion security and rebuilding plan, part of it probably was the belief that just making people happy by kicking out their obnoxious and villanous leader was sufficient to make them love you. As it turns out, they have more expectations (things improving security wise, economy wise, freedom wise, etc... even to the point of not being realistic expectations). When those expectations are shorted, they get pissed off. Voila! Today! But the incredibly naive theory that all ideologies are equivalent or that where you live or what kind of regime you live under is quite funny. The mod should have been 'Funny' not 'Insightful'. It is possible for us to differ (person to person) on particular values. But few of us would say that the right to be arbitrarily arrested, shot or disappeared is a good thing. Few of us would say that a state brutally oppressing minorities was a good thing. There really *are* some commonly agreeble points. This is how some world bodies have developed a generalized concepts of international law and human rights. It *does* matter what your value system is, when it threatens to impinge on the rights of others. It is *your* value system and should only be considered applicable to *you*. The minute you start breaking that boundary, you are infringing others' basic freedoms. It *does* matter if your government oppresses you and others or not. Yes, certainly, there is a theory that enough people oppressed badly enough might maybe rebel, but revolution without outside support is difficult. And while we blissfully wait for revolution to uplift people (or for people to 'uplift themselves' which is a grouping of people into a personified entity that probably does an injustice to the reality), innocent people are oppressed in many cases. Or killed. How anyone can find a practice of ignoring or standng off while this goes on defensible is beyond me. You can spin all the fine words about freedom and compassion and the right to choose your own fate, but if people have no information to know about their alternatives, no freedom to explore them, no ability to discuss them without going to jail or disappearing, then that's a horrendous situation that all the local will in the world might not fix. Sometimes, it takes a big 200 lbs gorilla to come in and lay down a new way of doing things. And then step back and let the people sort their own problems out when they finally *have* the freedom to be pissed off, dissappointed, etc. Disagree with me if you will... I accord you that freedom (and you'd take it anyway). But realize that you have it and not everyone does because not every government lets them.

      --
      -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    111. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by operagost · · Score: 1
      Listen pal -- at least I remembered not to order brontosaurus ribs again when they tipped my car over. Fred Flintstone keeps doing it every show! Must be a blue-stater.

      I'm sure you won't be my "fan" any longer now that you know that.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    112. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by kaladorn · · Score: 1

      Sadly, the benevolent monarchy often gives way to the malignant monarchy, the inept monarchy, the corrupt monarchy, the repressive monarchy, or any other of a range of flavours of absolute (often less than competent) rule.

      And it is debatable whether monarchy is the best system from an economic point of view. So far, depending on how you do your math, democracy might have monarchy edged on that score.

      We're seeing the demise of monarchies the world over (last 200 years) and the increase of democracies. Or things that call themselves democracies, but that's a whole other discussion....

      --
      -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    113. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      You believe you understand your freedoms better than he does; he believes you don't have as many freedoms as you think.

      Is it just me, or are these not even close to being mutually exclusive? Or even in disagreement with each other?

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    114. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Gannoc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If there is a riot in downtown Seattle, I expect the military to come through and clear the streets and remove the rioters, using WHATEVER FORCE IS NECESSARY.

      Yes, and lets hope that every single person in power has the same definition of "riot" as you do.

    115. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is that in 1945 China was a democracy.

      Stay with us here, guy...
      They meant China in todays world, not China in 1945.
      It was a comparison of two cultures in two different time periods.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    116. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by detect · · Score: 1

      Mao? Um, Mao was not in charge of China last time I checked. Dubya is. Let's stay on current events.

      The U.S. detaining foreign citizens for 3 years, subjecting them to brutal interrogation only to release them with NO charge is astounding to say the least.

      Can you imagine the outcry if China did the same to a U.S. citizen? Habib is an _Australian_ citizen and got subjected to -if proven to be correct- what I could only label as War crimes by the US government.

      All I'm saying is that it is pretty damn arrogant for US citizens to expect to be treated well in foreign countries when they do not have a similar respect for foreign citizens. Even if they are their allies!

      --
      // The fastest Alt-Tab in the West
    117. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by mickyflynn · · Score: 1

      so, you're saying that you lose and lose bad?

    118. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen Brotha!!!

    119. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you Jim!

      Finally someone who understands this basic truth about our Constitutional Republic. If our Founding Fathers were around to hear all of this "Democracy" bullshit, I can't imagine the hell there'd be to pay.

    120. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd just like to point out that your post is basically a slap in the face to the entirety of Latin America, which has been trying desperately to become stable and democratic ever since achieving independence from Spain. In fact, the differences between the history of the US and Latin have more to do with luck and geography than freedom (economic or otherwise). The Latin American wars for indepdence were huge compared to the US war, ranging across a much larger area, and required the creation of large, professional armies. Most of the countries created after the war immediately tried to adopt constitutions based on the US model, but said armies were capable of striking down any constitution they didn't like. This problem was exacerbated by the fact that the Spanish colonies were far less economically integrated than the English ones, and it was these circumstances that allowed the caudillos to flourish-- ensuring that Latin America would spend most of the 19th century bouncing from one brutal local warlord to another. Something very similar could have happened in the United States, via the Conway Cabal, Shay's Rebellion, or the Whiskey Rebellion. You have also conveniently forgotten the economic difficulty involved in competing with the industrialized US, which has tended to exacerbate the instabilities initially present in Latin America, but that's a different (and much more complicated) kettle of fish.

      The link between freedom and prosperity is the central myth of America. It's no surprise that you defend it so avidly. But it's not necessarily true that the US government is responsible for its prosperity, or even vice versa; arguing otherwise reminds me very much of "history is on our side"-style socialist proclamations.

    121. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In ancient Greece "tyrants" were given power by the city's ruling elite (usually some form of noble or oligarchical body). These tyrants were also originally seen as beneficial, much as in Peru, because their extra-legal powers allowed them solve problems that were too politically difficult (usually, disputes between the rich and the poor) for a city-state to solve otherwise.

      Sorry. Pedantic, I know.

    122. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by gaderson · · Score: 1
      I'm not going to stand up for what's happenning at Gitmo--I'm as opposed to it as you seem to be. However, I can't allow the suggestion that what is happening in Cuba somehow makes the US worse than China to go unchallenged.

      Yes it's a bit of hyperbole, but...Ever heard of something called hypocricy, or irony. When our 'president' talks about Freedom{tm} in his Inagural speach, and yet it's obvious to those around the world looking at things like Gitmo that Freedom{tm} isn't total for this country, you've got to wonder. Yes, Mao did some dispicable things, but, that dones't excues us from actually following our retoric.

      We talk about freedom and democracy, but, if we can't show that we follow it in our everyday life then we're just blowing hot air. This is why the world laughs at us. We talk of freedom, but, count China, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Russia, etc. among our 'friends' how is that embracing freedom?

      --

      Some days I feel like Schrodinger's cat.

    123. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by online-shopper · · Score: 1

      Britain is not a democracy.
      of course, neither is the US.
      We are a representative republic.
      which from what I understand is pretty close to what england is now. As the Monarchy is not much more than a figurehead.

    124. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by 17028 · · Score: 1

      USA is the most democratic republic in the world? By what standard? Without looking up the latest reports, I'd guess Finland and a few others probably has got the US beat at the moment.

      Also, I think you are mixing apples and oranges. Republic and monarchy are two opposites, and so is despotism and democracy. You can have a democratic monarchy, which we call a constitutional monarchy. I don't see how this is "not so good." The Scandinavian countries (Sweden, Denmark, and Norway) are near the top in all reports of human rights and democracy I've seen. You can also have a democratic republic, as you yourself point out. Or a despotic (authoritarian) republic, like Iraq. Sure, in "Sid Meier's Civilization" Democracy and Republic might be two choices you have to choose from, but in the real world they aren't mutually exclusive.

    125. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by komissar · · Score: 1

      splendid! nice to see our guys are getting along so well down there. you seem to be forgetting that the prisoners at gitmo are illegal combatants who were TRYING TO KILL OUR GUYS IN AFGANISTAN! they have NO rights whatsoever under our legal system. as rummy says, i hope they're being "forward leaning" enough to accomplish their mission objectives to give you the freedom to fret their methods.

    126. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by kibler · · Score: 1

      Habib is an _Australian_ citizen and got subjected to -if proven to be correct- what I could only label as War crimes by the US government.

      The news article forgot to mention the clandestine kidnapping of this fine, upstanding gentleman from his nice cozy bed in Australia.

      News flash! These poor, mistreated souls are the very same people who flew planes into buildings, who bombed a subway in Spain, who cut off the heads of innocent civilians trying to help Iraqi citizens. Your sympathies are sorely misplaced.

    127. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by kibler · · Score: 1

      Right now men and women are not held equal under the law. The supreme court has ruled in the past that all the rights of the constitution apply only to men and no case has come up to change this.

      So, you are saying that women don't have freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to carry firearms, the right to not incriminate themselves, etc.? And I have been letting my wife wear the pants in my family all of this time....

      I do not have a vote that counts for the election of the leader of my country.

      Especially if you live in Texas and want to vote for anyone other than W.

    128. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by rjh · · Score: 1

      Japan and Germany are stark examples of stable democracies which were imposed by force. Germany was a fascist dictatorship until the Allies conquered it (damn near burning it to the ground in the process) and forced democracy on the people. It took root quickly, and today Germany is a highly functioning democracy.

      Japan was a fascist autocracy until we dropped a pair of nukes on them and forced their chief autocrat, pretty much at gunpoint, to renounce all claims to being a living god. MacArthur went into Japan with orders to rebuild the place, and today Japan is a highly functional democracy.

      Modern history shows two of the world's foremost democracies became that way as the result of losing a war and having it imposed on them by the victor.

    129. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by paperclip2003 · · Score: 1

      "It would seem that I understand my freedoms and democracy better than you." Yes ... You are right the process worked and failed at the same time. Maybe the "popular" idea was wrong. We were all wrong. It was wrong in Germany in World War II. People loved the Nazis and they were the "popular" movement, they made people feel safe from "those other people" that made them loose the first World War. "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), Letter to Josiah Quincy, Sept. 11, 1773. I could not remeber the exact quote so I got it from here: http://www.flownet.com/gat/freedom.html Our represenitives did not screw up, they gave us what the "popular vote" people wanted; they wanted "Safty" over freedom. Patriot act was an act of Democracy, even though I do not like, nor agree with it -- however, people like the "idea" of a someone keeping them safe. People always talk about "We need a law..." and then we bitch about " We have this law ..." With every law to keep us safe, we loose a freedom. Yet people choose safty and this was Democracy. You can not close every border and search every citizen and then claim to be free. Freedom and Democracy are not the same thing. I love the United States of America, but damn it we have been wrong. Every citizen is responsible for acting in an irresponsible manner. Why did we sell Iraq weapons in the first place? We created a monster, no matter how you look at it. Our corporations sold weapons, our people made money, and our goverment basked in the "new" destablized middle east and then we bought lots of cheap oil. End of story! Not just Bush is responsible, or the house of reps, or the senate, the Democrats or Republicans. We the people are resposible. I love my country, but we screwed up! -R

    130. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by R1ch4rd · · Score: 1

      There is a simple counter example to what you said:
      In the arab world ( or a big chunk of it ) women are treated like slaves. Bought at marriage, with no rights whatsoever. For us this is wrong, but still everyone there considers it normal, so who are we to impose our views in there country ?

      On the other hand, I agree that we must not stay idle when people are suffering in some part of the world, but a balance must be struck and destroying the whole infrastructure of a contry, disbanding the police and the army and starting all from scrach with 120k force is definetily NOT the way to do it.
      Unfornately we, the civilized world, would not move a finger if there wasn't either a threat or profit for us, no matter the suffering. And this is the saddest part about our deemed "superiority".

    131. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by idlake · · Score: 1

      Only after both groups have approved the bill does it get sent to the President to be signed into law. This means that the PATRIOT act did not pass due to GWB. The PATRIOT act passed because a majority in the House and Senate thought it was a good idea, and the President agreed.

      Hitler and his laws were passed by a democratically elected house of representatives, too.

      It would seem that I understand my freedoms and democracy better than you.

      You may know about your freedoms; for example, your freedom to screw yourself in the US system of government is indeed nearly unlimited, and it is being taken increasing advantage of by the electorate. But you apparently don't know shit about democracy, because democracy is not about unrestrained rule of the majority.

      I guess I shouldn't exist according to your logic.

      Oh, there are plenty of people like you in every nation: people who eventually, out of irrational fear, nationalism, or greed, end up killing democracy.

    132. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been looked into, and no one read the Patriot Act. They didn't have time. Apparently that's a fairly normal thing - signing stuff in without reading it - which doesn't say much for the whole process

    133. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by identity0 · · Score: 1

      The PATRIOT act passed because a majority in the House and Senate thought it was a good idea, and the President agreed.

      You say that as if that means it's a good idea. The Tonkin Gulf resolution passed with what, two dissenters? And the declaration of war in WWI passed with only one dissenter. Not to mention all the downright unconstitutional laws that passed the same hurdles.

      The fact is, on issues of knee-jerk nationalism politicians are actually *worse* than the average citizen, because they're afraid that the ones who are really nationalist and reactionary will rally against them, wheras more reasonable voters tend not to go after politicians for being too nationalistic.

      Even if doing the 'patriotic' thing will actually *hurt* the country, they'll do it to look like they're all for mom and apple pie.

    134. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not going to stand up for what's happenning at Gitmo--I'm as opposed to it as you seem to be. However, I can't allow the suggestion that what is happening in Cuba somehow makes the US worse than China to go unchallenged.


      Mao used to rape twelve year old girls. His "Cultural Revolution" and "Great Leap Forward" accounted for the deaths of millions of his own citizens. When the US starts the wholesale murder of its own citizens [...] then we'll talk about "if you think china is bad..."



      The Cultural Revolution and Great Leap Forward were abominable, but China is not as bad as that now. You can compare the genocide of American Indians - both tragedies occurred in the same political system as today.

      I actually agree your point that the US is mostly freer than China today, but China itself is much freer today than in the Cultural Revolution and Great Leap Forward.

    135. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by pisco_sour · · Score: 1

      Being from Peru, I'd like to clarify some of your points. There's internationally a lot of confusion regarding exactly what happened (or is happening right now) with Fujimori and his top adviser, Vladimiro Montesinos. First of all, Fujimori WAS a dictator: he performed a coup d'etat against himself in 1992, overthrowing the Constitution and basically doing whatever the hell he wanted until international pressure forced him to proclaim a new one, the year after, which of course largely favoured him. There's still a lot of debate here over wether we should go back to the 1979 Constitution -the last valid one- or instead just focus on ammending the 1993 text where it is needed.

      Peru suffered through 20 years of internal conflicts, which haven't really settled even nowadays. The main terrorist group, responsible for 54% of the almost 70,000 dead during that time, was Shining Path, a maoist, pol-potian, fundamentalist rebel group which spared no one. During the 80s, democratically elected governments relinquished responsibility on the internal war to the military, which in turn gained power, but largely failed against SP when applying conventional warfare mentality against guerrilla tactics. It was not until 1989 that new, intelligence-based tactics where put in place which eventually lead to the capture of SP's main heads.

      So yes, Shining Path was a huge threat, but the tactics supported by Fujimori were largely the military-based ones, as we was quite reliant on the military to support his own power. Human rights were completely disregarded, people arrested denied a fair trial, even access to a lawyer. There were mass executions we may never know of, thousands of missing persons, paramilitary operatives working beyond the scope of the law. It was horrible times, during which Fujimori used the excuse of security and prosperity to actually extend his own reach on anything and everything going on in the country. This all the time with the close help of Montesinos, carefully pulling the strings of the newly elected parliament and the justice system.

      Which brings us to corruption. Justice is very, very slow in Peru. For a long time, if you wanted your case to be dealt with in a shorter time, and also, with the result being in your favour, you had to visit Montesinos's infamous little room at the National Intelligence Service headquarters, and pay your respects. This was all videotaped, as Montesinos was sort of paranoid and voyeuristic, apparently: videos are still surfacing to this day, showing prominent political and ecomonical figures either paying or receiving money from the president's chief adviser. Corruption grew rampant across all state entities. Montesinos has even been proven links with top druglords at the time, from whom he collected money in exchange for having the military not interfere with their operations. Large part of this was known by the CIA, as was his previous, questionable background from years ago.

      It is true that terrorism came tumbling down during Fujimori, but it can hardly be said it was largely because of him. Moreover, his actions led to thousands of innocent deaths, and to the building of a corruption network which pulled the strings on everything that happened in this country, and to a point, still does. In the last years of his unconstitutional second term as president, his economic achievements crumbeld upon themselves and led to recession and massive unemployment and underemployment. He built thousands of schools nationwide: after the TV inaugurations, many of them are falling in pieces, or have no electricity or running water. The justice system is swamped, not only with their regular workload, but also by all of the special corruption cases that have to be dealt with. And now, with all of the terrorist cases that have to be tried again, because the original trials have are invalid, being unconstitutional. Hundreds of innocent people were tried without even knowing Spanish (Quechua speakers from the mountain region, primarily), and are right now serving sen

      --
      http://castorexmachina.wordpress.com - Filosofía, tecnología y cultura.
    136. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Funksaw · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm assuming you are not a United States citizen based on your choice of words here. Civics 101: laws are drafted and then passed around the Senate and the House of Representatives. Only after both groups have approved the bill does it get sent to the President to be signed into law. This means that the PATRIOT act did not pass due to GWB. The PATRIOT act passed because a majority in the House and Senate thought it was a good idea, and the President agreed.

      It would seem that I understand my freedoms and democracy better than you. Oh, and I voted for Bush, too. I guess I shouldn't exist according to your logic.


      The problem is that the world doesn't work according to Civics 101, sad but true. Had you studied Civics 201, Advanced Civics or, "How things actually work," you would have learned that while laws are proposed by representatives and voted on, the Executive branch since the 1940s has wielded immense unofficial but nonetheless real authority in legislation.

      In the case of the Patriot Act, the Executive branch actually *wrote* the darn thing, and it was passed to sympathetic members of Congress to propose. One of the reasons that it passed was because the vote for the Patriot Act occured before most congressmen and senators had even read the law.

      So while it's entirely true that the law passed because the majority in the House and Senate approved it, in many ways, particularly with the passage of the Patriot Act, Congress merely acted as a rubber stamp.

      Perhaps if you did more reading on what actually happened, rather than what should have happened, you'll understand why alot of people are pissed off that what should have happened didn't.
    137. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      So if people that was freedom are prevented by force to obtain it, I guess that means they don't want freedom.

      Is my logic correct?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    138. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by nml · · Score: 1

      Ok, so the Chinese don't think democracy is a basic human right since they don't have democracy. Have you considered the possibility that political dissenters tend to disappear in China? Or get run over by tanks? Perhaps at this time life is good enough in China that they are not willing to risk prosperity by having a violent revolution. But that doesn't mean the Chinese don't value democracy.

      Well, you're right in that the chinese government could be supressing democracy (and has in certain events in the past). However, supressing people who want to change government styles is hardly unique to china, or even to non-democratic governments. Irregardless, the chinese do not seem to value democracy as highly as western societies, and its their right to make up their own minds.

      Basically, I think democracy must be a natural desire of everyone; those that truly believe that they should be ordered around their whole lives have had the human spirit bred out of them, sadly. The desire to mold your destiny is simply human instict.

      i agree that the desire to influence your own destiny is natural and widespread, but i don't think that everybody agrees that democracy is the best way to achieve it. I don't care to argue about my opinions one way or the other, but i'm trying to point out that the chinese have the right to organise themselves in whatever government style they choose, without you passing moral judgement on them or accusing them of being sheep.

      My suspicion is that you are reacting to the war in Iraq; specifically, you believe that if you support the creation of democracies worldwide, then you support the war in Iraq by extension. If that's the case, then it's pretty disenginous of you.

      the war in Iraq couldn't have been further from my mind, and please don't accuse me of being disenginous based on conjecture.

    139. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did Britain get a stable democracy??

    140. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      Although I'd like to agree with you, I'm not sure. I think you should consider that your opinion is the result of your upbringing in western culture. Relatively speaking these "western values" are quite recent "inventions" (last 100-200 years) and only a minority of the worlds population might agree with you. Even within the western world the definitions of freedom, democracy and human rights differs a lot.

      I think a lot of the problems in USA foreign affairs stem from an attitude that their view is Right, godgiven and unnegociable. It tends to allienate people if they get talked to like they are children and "daddy knows what's best for them."

      Maybe you are right, and I tend to agree with your opinion, but I think you should realise that you too are very much a product of how you were reared.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    141. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by SPBesui · · Score: 1

      If you're refering to the Terry Schaivo case, it does not involve "right to die" but rather "right to let die" versus "right to let live."

      There is evidence for her desire to live, and the only evidence that she would want to die is a statement from her heartless, cheating husband with a financial interest in the outcome.

    142. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by formal_entity · · Score: 1

      No, the whole point is that Iraqis did not CHOOSE dictactorship so how can you be sure they wanted it? If there was a democratic election in Iraq and they choose to have a one-man-rules-it-all kind of government then fine, THEN so be it.

    143. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by mako1138 · · Score: 1

      Americans like their freedom, Iraqis like their dictatorship, and Chinese like their Communism.

      I don't think my dad liked Chinese Communism. What did he do? He got out of China. Granted, it's not the easiest thing to do, but he wasn't complacent.

    144. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      What is the legal age of consent (if it exists) in China? Using the term rape might not be correct in this case. Marriagable age used to be under 10 just a short while back, in parts of the US. (no more than 150-200 years, perhaps as little as 100 years ago).

      Anyway, there's a difference between being a harsh ruler and being harsh to your people, and claiming to be a benevolent ruler and still being harsh to your people.

      Pragmatically equivalent, but morally very different.

    145. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by shintaro · · Score: 1

      very same people who flew planes into buildings, who bombed a subway in Spain, who cut off the heads of innocent civilians trying to help Iraqi citizens.

      Then why did your oh so great democratic country not charge him and let him loose after 3 years in detention without charge?

    146. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      TRYING TO KILL OUR GUYS IN AFGANISTAN!

      And I suppose when one of your people in Iraq gets beheaded, it's ok, because "WE WERE TRYING TO KILL THEIR PEOPLE IN IRAQ"?

    147. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      The Cultural Revolution and Great Leap Forward were abominable, but China is not as bad as that now.

      This image says everything I need to about China not being "as bad as that" these days.

      As for what happened to the American Indians, I agree with you--it was a terrible thing, and our hands are most certainly not spotlessly clean. However, we are discussing the present state of affairs--the US is no longer hunting Indian tribes to extinction, and we as a nation would not tolerate our government engaging in a similar act today. Contrast this with China's current policies in Tibet.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    148. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      Yes it's a bit of hyperbole

      Saying that your statement was "a bit of hyperbole" is like calling the Grand Canyon a roadside ditch.

      Like I said, though, I agree with your basic point.

      We talk of freedom, but, count China, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Russia, etc. among our 'friends' how is that embracing freedom?

      You're preaching to the choir. Apparently, our way of punishing dictatorships involves lucrative deals resulting in a trade imbalance of tens of billions of dollars. "Bad dictator! Now go think about what you've done--and while you're at it, please take our manufacturing capability with you."

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    149. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by eraserewind · · Score: 1
      Monarchy - Again, not so good. This time the right to rule is typically passed down to people. Under a good (or powerless) ruler, the nation can thrive (see modern-day britain - you did know they had a queen, right?); under a bad one the nation can suffer.
      Actually I think a monarchy like Britian has is bad for democracy (beyond the obvious fact that a monarchy is inherently anti-democratic). The head of state has no legitimacy, and so never uses her power to counter balance the executive power of the Prime Minister. It is only through tradition that a balance is maintained. If someone moves to do away with governmental tradition, as Tony Blair has done through his governmental reforms, the balance becomes lost. A democratic non-executive head of state with a clearly defined role and power is a more effective guarantee of the executive not getting too far out of line.
    150. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Concern · · Score: 1

      Well, and graciously, said. I would say, "mod parent up" but it already is up. :)

      --
      Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
    151. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Kosi · · Score: 1

      Freedom, Democracy, Human rights, Equality

      Since when do these thing belong to the US world view and not only to the lame excuses for invading other countries?

      Freedom? In the country with the highest rate of prisoners?
      Democracy? The reality is called plutocracy!
      Human Rights? Ask the people in Guantanamo!
      Equality? In a country where white male people still concentrate most of the financial and political power?

    152. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by love2hateMS · · Score: 1

      This is utterly unproven hogwash. Any idiot can accuse the US of anything he wants, and you anti-American morons will shout it as fact. What about the hundreds of thousands of rapes, tortures, beheadings and mutilations perpetrated by Saddam's soldiers, WITH FULL GOVERNMENT BACKING?

      You America-haters just need to get a clue. The U.S. may not be perfect, but there is absolutely NO moral comparison to these brutal regimes. Europe has exponentially supported more dictators and torturers than the U.S. has. Sure, the U.S. has some shameful, foolish foreign policy decisions in its past, but our current President, like him or hate him, will not kneel and service dictators the way Europe will for financial gain.

      What was it I just read, the EU wants to start selling WEAPONS to CHINA? Who is opposing them? Oh, the horrible, militaristic U.S.A. So the peace-loving, tree-hugging, tolerant EU is going to sell weapons to a brutal regime because their economy is in the toilet. (Don't tell me 10% unemployment isn't in the toilet).

      Give me a break.

    153. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I'm sick of hearing people quote Mao's legacy in China. Mao DIED 30 years ago!!! Have you seen the difference between China in 1976 and 2005? The great leap forward was a mistake, but it's not like the current Chinese government is on course to starve it's citizens.

    154. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      Mao DIED 30 years ago!!! Have you seen the difference between China in 1976 and 2005?

      The Tiananmen Square massacre happened in 1989--that's a little more recent than Mao, wouldn't you say? Do you honestly believe that the Chinese government wouldn't do the same thing today?

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    155. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by stinerman · · Score: 1

      IMO, if you're losing, you need to switch to communism so you can build up your military.

      You may want to try the Persians. I find them to be among the best.

    156. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Rei · · Score: 1

      Heh, Teresa mentioned the whole thing with them filming people paying or taking bribes; she said she's still waiting for the videos on a number of people to surface ;) She thought it was pretty clever, and served the corrupt politicians right.

      As for what the people in the countryside thought, she grew up in the countryside - a little town in the mountains with no power, no running water, no sewage, etc. She later moved to Lima and lived there for a while before she moved to the US; I don't recall exactly when that was, however.

      As for Fujimori running again, I wouldn't be surprised if he stood a shot. Last I heard, the current government's approval rating was in the single digits.

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
    157. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by m1066ad · · Score: 1

      "Over the long run"?
      Doesn't that sentence take some hubris to utter?
      230 years isn't a very long time, as the lifespan of many governments go, after all.

    158. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the US's own views of that today are that these rights are given to you by the government. It's been this way since WWII, and probably was used to justify the internment camps the US military put Japanese Americans into. As it stands, the government can take away any of your rights as it sees fit, and certain legislation passed in the past 4 years doesn't help at all.

      Now, you may want these rights, and living in many nations, you will receive them. But just because you have them, and you think that you have a right to them, does not mean that everyone else (including those in power) should also think this way. I'm not saying I think this way, mind you, but that when you're in power, you've got every right to use your power as you see fit. The real question is whether you, in using your power, will still have the power.

      The US government is in power not because it is right, moral, just, or superior to any other form of government. It is in power because it appeases the people and removes cause for rebellion by danging the carrot of change (reform) in front of their eyes and calling that freedom, democracy, human rights, and so-called equality (something we all know doesn't actually exist, even in the form of equal opportunity).

      On the other hand, the US system certainly works, and is probably better than most other forms of government out there. It could be worse--a lot worse.

      But just because things are done one way here doesn't mean that any other way is wrong, despite the US government's insistence otherwise. It just means it's different. If the people there are satisfied too (at least to the point of not actively participating in a rebellion), then it's gotta be doing something right as well.

    159. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Locke2005 · · Score: 1
      Actually, Republicans are rather hypocritical about freedom. Basic tenets of the Republican party include personal responsibility and freedom from government intervention... EXCEPT when it comes to forcing everyone else to adhere to their views about abortion, gay marriage, drugs, pornography, etc.

      Likewise, Democrats also beleive in personal liberties and "the right to choose"... EXCEPT when it comes to the right to self defense, the right to choose which schools your children go to, or the right to choose how you spend your own money rather than the government making that decision for you, etc.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    160. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by kibler · · Score: 1

      My oh so great country is protecting the rest of the world by wiping out this vile scum. Many of the other supposed leaders in the world would rather hide their heads in the sand instead of standing up to the terrorists. Since this is a WAR and those fine upstanding citizens are terrorists, they have NO rights. Are POW's in general charged with crimes? No, they are released back to their home countries.

      Of course, I'm sure you will come up with some reason to blame America first rather than the perpetrators of terror.

    161. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by learn+fast · · Score: 1

      You're both wrong, for the following reason: A majority of the people in this country did not support the Patriot Act. Because a majority of the people in this country do not vote, know nothing of what the government is or could be doing, and have no idea what the Patriot act is.

      Seriously, smart people seem to forget this. 70% of the people in this country cannot name their Senators or Congressperson. Therefore I find it hard to believe that they have any degree of informed opinion on any particular law that these politicians create. Informed people tend to forget that by far most people are not at all like them (frighteningly so), and make generalizations that tend to be biased towards themselves. A majority of the people in this country do not support the Patriot Act, or more precisely, know anything about the Patriot Act.

    162. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by learn+fast · · Score: 1

      It's a silly matter of definitions matched with black-and-white thinking.

      Was this person in Peru completely free? No.

      Am I in the United Statues completely free? No.

      So, we both aren't free. Our conditions must the be same, right?

      Wrong. The people of Peru's freedom's were being taken away by non-government forces (drug lords and rebel/terrorists). Being able to go to work if you want to without being shot is a freedom! Just because you're being denied that right by a non-government force doesn't mean it doesn't count as not being taken away. This fairly ruthless and corrupt dictator actually made people more free. Not, of course, more free than they could be theoretically by any extent, but freedom isn't a black-and-white thing, or else I fall into the "not free" category and that's a fairly absurd way to look at it.

      * Freedom isn't binary
      * Government isn't the only thing that can take away freedom

    163. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by learn+fast · · Score: 1

      While the Guantanamo Bay prison represents a gross miscarriage of justice, it's nothing on the scale of what goes on in China. Thousands of people are executed a year in China for relatively minor crimes. China does a Guantanamo Bay twice every day before breakfast. Guantanamo Bay-type stuff is normal and commonplace for the whole of China.

      This isn't comparing apples to oranges, it's comparing an apple to an orchard of apples.

    164. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      Then again, it's pretty tough to charge someone for commiting suicide.

      But if you can prevent them from committing suicide, then you can charge them with the crime.

      Such a crime should merit the death penalty.

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
    165. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad to see you paid attention in civics class. Now pay attention to the real world: the President pushed hard for the PATRIOT ACT, and as the most powerful Republican in government, he has a great deal of influence over the Republicans in Congress. Congressmen who don't go along with the President and other party leaders tend to have a difficult time getting committee assignments. That makes it more difficult for them to get their own agenda enacted, or to bring home the bacon to their constituents. This means more trouble getting reelected.

      Not to mention, the Patriot Act was drafted partially by the Justice Dept. You may also have noticed Ashcroft touring the country campaigning for PATRIOT, and the President mentioning it in campaign speeches. The executive branch has also taken the lead in applying PATRIOT to non-terrorist offenses, contrary to the stated intent of Congress when they voted for the thing. Finally, according to some of the Congressmen themselves, this act that was written by the executive was pushed through Congress before most members had time to read this 300-page act they were voting for. Ron Paul and a few other members complained bitterly about this.

      Here's a detailed history of the passage of PATRIOT. Note this quote (my emphasis): "Within days, Ashcroft held a press conference and called on Congress to approve the Justice Department's legislative plan in a week's time."

    166. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1


      IIRC, Microsoft made SOAP.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
    167. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Zenzilla · · Score: 1

      peep this:

      http://www.now.org/issues/economic/cea/

    168. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is a country of almost 1.5 Billion people. Keeping those people united and in peace and prosperity has never been easy. China is following it's own path towards human rights and liberty. Democracy is being introduced on the local level. Every year, the government grows more and more permissive to the media. Jury trials are being introduced. The death penalty is being limited, perhaps to be abolished entirely in a few years time. These steps are slow and gradual, stability must come first. While I don't condone the Chinese government, I certainly understand it.

      To take an example: when you have 1.5 billion citizens, granting a right to free assembly means that any fringe protest movement could gather enough supporters to close down all traffic in Beijing or Shanghai.

    169. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by kaladorn · · Score: 1

      How do you know 'everyone' considers it normal?

      In such cases, it is very difficult to ascertain the will of the people involved - they lack education in the options, they lack the freedom to discuss and consider and experiment with them, etc. They risk public censure or other punishments by trying.

      So really, in that case, I say... is someone in that situation really free to hold their different view?

      Rwandan Genocide was an example of standing back and not doing something when we should have. So was the Holocaust. (By 'We', I mean the wealthy western world that makes claims about championing freedom and democracy and human rights).

      BTW, the fact that the situation in Iraq may have required the removal of a dictator does not and should not be taken as suggesting that the follow on operations were well planned, executed, or that their results have been very good. But that doesn't mean that someone didn't need to get Saddam out of power. It just means the job was not done anything near to flawlessly.

      And as to your last sentence, I could not agree more. I think we (including my country that did not go) should have went to Iraq. But it should have been for the right reasons (the reasons occasionally alluded to, but probably not meant... and not for the economic ones I suspect). And it should have been in the right way.

      I think anyone can admit the situations of real world geopolitics have complexities and poorly implemented plans can result in untold suffering. At the same time, I don't think some antiquated idea of national soveriegnty should trump basic human rights and freedoms.

      There are no clear, easy answers. That is why we (collectively) still haven't got this right.

      --
      -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    170. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by miruku · · Score: 1

      you gotta fight.. for your right... to PAARRTTYYY!!1!

      --
      MilkMiruku
    171. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. We can't stuff freedom down anybody's throats, and Lord knows, the Chinese don't want to be free. All those Chinese who got massacred in Tiannamen Square, they didn't *really* want freedom. Nope, they just thought it would be cool to piss off the authoritarian government and get themselves tortured and killed. Yoink.

      Sarcasm aside, there are actually plenty of people in the world who really, honestly don't want freedom, but oddly enough it's always somebody else they don't want to be free. . .

    172. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by paolooprandi · · Score: 1

      But Kant said that freedom was sacrificed to reason... Individual freedom when interrogated thoroughly is an abstraction. I don't believe that there is any human free from one ideology or other, and the more false information I receive, or more assumed-knowledge I absorb without interrogating, will not make me freer.

    173. Re:Freedom is not an "incompatable world view" by Apro+im · · Score: 1

      Revolution != revolutionary war

  150. UNTRUE by fliptout · · Score: 5, Informative

    You are wrong, sir, I can indeed waste my day away reading slashdot in china.

    Many news sites in English are not blocked...yet, who knows.

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
    1. Re:UNTRUE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah, is that why your website is hosted by the Electrical and Computer Engineering department at the University of Texas? Sounds like you're in Texas, not China!

    2. Re:UNTRUE by fliptout · · Score: 1

      It was when I was in university :p
      I've been reading /. since before uni and haven't changed that bit of info.

      --
      A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
  151. USA, China, .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....what is difference?

  152. if you really want to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the best option is to go via a private server (don't use a commercial anonymiser that will just attract attention) outside the country and encrypt all traffic to it.

    encrypted tunnels to private networks arent anything unusual or suspicious and what is inside them is pretty damn secure.

  153. You are aware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that, as a foreign national, you will probably attract twice the usual level of suspicion given to typical citizens?

  154. Isn't this like asking....? by stuartkahler · · Score: 1

    Isn't this like asking how you can get easy access in the USA to 14-year-old pr0n or Al-Quaeda meeting sites? It's possible, I'm sure, but you're going to be buying a new front door sometime in your future.

  155. Easier way to get a ssh proxy by alirano · · Score: 1
    If you're gone and away, and need a safe proxy, and have not had time to prepare Squid or anything elaborate, but you do have ssh access to anywhere, the standard ssh client includes a perfect SOCKS4 proxy. Just do
    ssh -D 8080 -f -N yourhost
    and you're all set. Use localhost:8080 as SOCKS4 proxy host.

    I would really recommend using your own laptop with full file system encryption. And I generally agree with other posters about that old saw: "When in Rome, do as the Romans do."

    1. Re:Easier way to get a ssh proxy by greenrd · · Score: 1
      Thanks for that - that's really useful!

  156. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I got tell you first of all slashdot.org is not banned in China.

    In fact , most of the english websites is not banned in China, except playboy-type sites.Sometimes you may face inconvinence but don't worry to much you will soon get used to it.

    For news sites , I think the only one still banned is news.google.com .Additionally , the situation of game and mp3 sites are not that bad.

    As long as you move to China not for political purpose , you can use the internet as you like

    1. Re:Well by skink1100 · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Sometimes you may face inconvinence but don't worry to much you will soon get used to it.

      Funny, that sounds like something one might hear on the first day in a prison shower. >:-0

      Seriously, I've spent some time in the middle east, and internet access is curtailed there as well. However, it's mostly pr0n & gambling sites that get blocked; authorities there aren't as insecure as they are in China.

      S

    2. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Additionally , the situation of game and mp3 sites are not that bad.

      Well, that's a euphamistic way of speaking. Put it this way - if you speak Chinese, it's a lot easier to find illegal downloads.

    3. Re:Well by nazsco · · Score: 1

      Nice! maybe i can route my access trhu a gateway there and get rid of those porn and gambling ads!

    4. Re:Well by boola-boola · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, phdcomics.com was not accessible in China (for me, anyways), and I don't remember, but I don't think google was either.

    5. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put it this way - if you speak Chinese, it's a lot easier to find illegal downloads.

      Wouldn't being able to *read* Chinese be the biggest obstacle there?

    6. Re:Well by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Well, that's a euphemistic way of speaking. Put it this way - if you speak Chinese, it's a lot easier to find illegal downloads.

      And even if you don't, it's much easier to buy whatever software, movies, audio burnt to CDR or DVD, for about 50 cents/disc, than spending hours downloading it. Including more porn you could ever want -- that's the cheapest since the demand is huge, kinky Jap porn (schoolgirls, rape, upskirt, nurses, etc) especially.

  157. Instant Messaging by wondermog · · Score: 0

    What about Instant messaging? Does the firewall block any ports related to personal chatting? You could just have a friend tell you the news, or even transfer you a localized version. It's not exactly circumventing the firewall if someone just describes the gist of a few news stories to you over IM.

    --
    freeminimacs, just becau
  158. Truth is not their first objective. by glrotate · · Score: 2, Funny

    VE RI
    TAS

    1. Re:Truth is not their first objective. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      I know their slogan is "veritas", I was making a comparison similar to irony. Jeez...slashdot.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  159. re the firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    use knoppix
    spoof your ip
    netcat
    change your mac address

  160. I imagine it's not *that* hard by Torontoman · · Score: 1

    It's probably not too hard to get around it from in there. Of course, the consequences might be a little harsher than you'd like.

    And yet it is probably not too different from our government(s) blocking sites that *it* thinks is unsuitable for *us*.

    The conspiracy theorist in me thinks this happens more than we'd like to know.

  161. Don't Be Too Elaborate by kentborg · · Score: 1

    I've kinda done that. I used to work for Motorola. They have a
    corporate firewall that blocks bad content, and possibly keeps notes
    on what bad content individuals ask for. I learned to avoid those
    sites.

    For e-mail I always ssh into my basement server and use mutt. At
    Motorola we weren't allowed to ssh out, so I parked an ssh server on
    port 443 (the secure web port) and did my ssh on port 443. (Because
    Motorola has a user/password routine for getting out, that part was
    actually kinda complicated on the client end, but China probably isn't
    so nasty.)

    Note, China might insist upon your going through their
    man-in-the-middle with all encrypted traffic.

    I also don't keep e-mail on my notebook, it is all on my server.

    For surfing forbidden web sites I would suggest something that
    wouldn't attract attention with a lot of encrypted traffic, such as
    the text-only browser lynx.

    Mostly I would keep my nose clean and not do things they don't like.

    Remember, doing fancy cryptography on your local hard disk can easily
    backfire. Say the secret police grab you, place you notebook in front
    of you, and ask you to type the encryption key. What are you going to
    do?

    As a foreigner I would try to act like a foreigner, access the
    internet as a foreigner would, only be as crafty as a foreigner would
    be. I would also be a geeky foreigner, I would try to buy more with
    that. Were I doing anything vaguely political while visiting China I
    would try extra hard to stay clean in their eyes--no ssh software, no
    way.

    -kb

  162. You sell chitlins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from China?

  163. censorship via blunt instrument by cryptozoologist · · Score: 1

    i have 3 domains that don't have anything whatsoever objectionable to the chinese government, however i am told by friends they cannot be reached from china, probably because the folks i am hosting them with are also hosting something objectionable.

    tips for travel in china:
    take few clothes and only one nasty old pair of shoes, and buy shoes and clothes there. (note this may not be a great plan if you are particularly large)

    a cyber cafe is a door that is ajar through which one can see a computer.

    everything is delicious

    have fun!

  164. That is one difference about the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You usually cannot bribe your way out of trouble here--any attempt to do so will likely land you in a great deal more trouble. You can buy influence (campaign contributions, public policy ads), but for the most part you can't buy judges or police.

    1. Re:That is one difference about the U.S. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, but you can buy a lawyer. Which, from your standpoint, is pretty much the same thing as bribery...let me pay a bunch of money and make this problem go away. If your case in China was too high-profile for the cops to ignore, I'm sure the purchase of the lawyer with the best guanxi would help you to at least escape the country.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  165. In Communist China,... by Conanymous+Award · · Score: 1

    ...the Firewall circumvents YOU!

    Bad jokes aside, as is the common practice in communist countries, you as a rich(?) foreigner are more privileged than Zhoe Average. At hotels, for example, you can have CNN and other 'dangerous' news sources, possibly even non-blocked internet, too. Not sure how this works when you're an individual, though.

  166. he asked a specific question by psyph3r · · Score: 1

    The guy asked a specific question and probably knew the risks. You don't need to inform him of how despicable he is. He asked how to get around it, not what are the moral and ethical implications of said subject. That is his decision to make. i say give him the information, let him make the decision to break the laws of that country.
    Think encryption, or secure tunneling. I would set up a server here connect to it through secure tunneling and have it as your web source sending the requested uncensored internet data to you through the secure tunnel. Learn how to do it and i am sure it would be possible.

  167. It's a bootleg economy. Enjoy it! by eclectic4 · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...you will be rewarded by being able to purchase almost any piece of software known to man for around $3. Any movie for about $1, and game for about $3.

    There are malls there that are huge, and hold nothing but pirated software. Also, they copy EVERYthing, even entire cars. Honda in fact hired them for some parts manufacturing because they copied theirs so well for a much lower cost. If you can't beat them... They even introduced a complete copy of a "GM" car before GM even announced it. They are absolute masters at copying everything, manufacturing those copies, and even industrial espioniage. And the speed at which they do it is amazing.

    It's a bootleg economy. Enjoy it I say!

    --

    "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
    1. Re:It's a bootleg economy. Enjoy it! by LesPaul75 · · Score: 1

      Awesome! Thank you. Finally, someone actually states what's good about the country. Everyone else is either saying how horrible and scary it is, or that it's "not that bad." But not one comment on why anyone would want to risk giving up all of their freedoms and human rights just to go there, whether the threat is actually real or not.

    2. Re:It's a bootleg economy. Enjoy it! by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Of course you can get the same in Bali or Malaysia...

      I know someone who lived in Malaysia for a few years, and the amount of stuff she got over there is just amazing ;)

  168. Let's get something straight here. by LeiGong · · Score: 5, Insightful
    China is not 1984. Repeat after me, China is not 1984. China is not EastAsia.

    It seems to me very few of you have actually been to China or even understand how the system there works. For the same reason why Europeans think we're a country of hicks driving around in a pickup with shotguns who elected a idiot to office is why you think the Chinese is some sort of omni-present superpower that oversees all of the minute details of its citizens' lives and takes sadistic pleasure in torture. You're taking in media hype and a fear of the unknown. China has its share of problems: freedom of speech and freedom of religion come to mind. These are serious issues that need to be addressed but that doesn't mean everytime you commit a crime in China you will be sent into "reeducation." That also doesn't mean if you use a proxy to surf the web that they're going to break your thumbs. The Chinese government are too busy with the same serious issues that the US is dealing with to be bothered by these minor offenses.

    While it may sound like the Chinese police force operate a Gestapo-like regime but that's far from the truth. Believe or not, China has laws and 99% of the time, they are followed. They also have lawyers that will free an innocent man. Some people vision of a totalitarian society governed by "The Party" are just too far fetched. Do they honestly think that the police operate on whatever laws they please and the people live in constant fear? I'll tell you from actually lived in China that it is hardly the case. People are way too reoccupied w/ making money to give a shit. Just remember the same media that is telling you to be afraid of China is the same one that ran the special on 20/20 about the wide-spread dangers of drier lint fires and the world-wide SARS epedemic.

    1. Re:Let's get something straight here. by Machine9 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I must say that my visit to upstate NY did little good as far as the stereotype american thing is concerned, but you have a valid point.

      Likewise, the dutch are not all pot head pornographers that kill babies for fun.

      In fact, I've never met more potheads anywhere in my extensive travels than i did in the rochester area. This was AFTER a two hour delay trying to get through customs at the airport... (long hair! trenchcoat! flew in from amsterdam! DEALER ALERT!)

      I'm pretty sure, that as long as you don't go around rabble-rousing and trying to engender a revolution, you'll be fine. And the worst they'd probably do to you in china as a foreigner, is deport you. It's the sensible thing to do.

    2. Re:Let's get something straight here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It seems to me very few of you have actually been to China or even understand how the system there works. For the same reason why Europeans think we're a country of hicks driving around in a pickup with shotguns who elected a idiot to office is why you think the Chinese is some sort of omni-present superpower that oversees all of the minute details of its citizens' lives and takes sadistic pleasure in torture.
      I've been to both China and the US, and I can attest the "elected an idiot to office" part.
    3. Re:Let's get something straight here. by tengwar · · Score: 2, Informative
      In support of what you say: I was over in China recently. There were a lot of cultural differences I found disturbing (the huge rich/poor gap, for instance), but of the many countries I've visited, it was the one where I felt safest going down back streets at night. There were not many police around, and the ones I saw seemed pretty laid-back (and perhaps a little amateurish in style). While I understand it has its problems, I got the impression that it's generally on the way "up" (perhaps influenced by my wife's stories of living through the Cultural Revolution). I really liked the place.

      (Just don't get me started on the food!)

    4. Re:Let's get something straight here. by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      "For the same reason why Europeans think we're a country of hicks driving around in a pickup with shotguns who elected a idiot to office"

      What? You aren't, you don't and you didn't?

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    5. Re:Let's get something straight here. by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      It seems to me very few of you have actually been to China or even understand how the system there works. ... you think the Chinese is some sort of omni-present superpower that oversees all of the minute details of its citizens' lives and takes sadistic pleasure in torture. You're taking in media hype and a fear of the unknown.

      Yes. If only someone could post an Ask Slashdot on this topic and we could get some real answers!

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    6. Re:Let's get something straight here. by mindstormpt · · Score: 1
      It seems to me very few of you have actually been to China or even understand how the system there works. For the same reason why Europeans think we're a country of hicks driving around in a pickup with shotguns who elected a idiot to office is why you think the Chinese is some sort of omni-present superpower that oversees all of the minute details of its citizens' lives and takes sadistic pleasure in torture.
      I've been to both China and the US, and I can attest the "elected an idiot to office" part.
    7. Re:Let's get something straight here. by sharkey · · Score: 1
      we're a country of hicks driving around in a pickup with shotguns

      That's one big pickup!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    8. Re:Let's get something straight here. by ThousandStars · · Score: 2, Interesting
      While it may sound like the Chinese police force operate a Gestapo-like regime but that's far from the truth. Believe or not, China has laws and 99% of the time, they are followed.

      As I wrote about in some of my previous posts, tell that to Harry Wu. I heard him and Dan Picouda, the US Consular Officer who worked to free him, speak. It was both an enlightening and frightening experience.

      The most salient point is that in China, the authorities wield absolute, arbitrary power over you. This means that, more likely than not, your experience will be like that of the parent poster. If not, the Chinese government can more or less do whatever it wants to you.

    9. Re:Let's get something straight here. by Tiny+Elvis · · Score: 1

      Aw come on, I'm really curious about the food now. Let's hear about the it.

    10. Re:Let's get something straight here. by iocc · · Score: 2, Funny

      >For the same reason why Europeans think we're a country of hicks driving around in a pickup with shotguns

      wtf? You dont do that?
      I have been wrong all these years :/

    11. Re:Let's get something straight here. by norkakn · · Score: 1

      not all of us have shotguns and a lot of people have SUVs, not pickup trucks

    12. Re:Let's get something straight here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yup, no suppression occuring in the PRC. None, at all. Move along.

      Just a little "mourner-beating" is all... but hey, they deserved it for mourning an ex-leader who dared to say that the Tiananmen massacre was wrong. Imagine!

      http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/200 50 127/wl_afp/chinatiananmenpoliticspetitioners_05012 7114011

      BEIJING (AFP) - China has detained dozens of people, some of whom have been severely beaten, for trying to mark the death of former leader Zhao Ziyang, witnesses said.

      Photo
      AFP/File Photo

      The allegations came as the government intensified security to prevent mourners attending Saturday's funeral in Beijing for Zhao, the former Communist Party secretary general purged for opposing the 1989 military crackdown on the Tiananmen democracy movement.

      At least three people, including a woman in her 70s, were punched and manhandled by police officers outside the government offices which receive complaints in the Chinese capital, witnesses said.

      They were among some 60 people who pinned white paper flowers to their clothes, a traditional Chinese symbol of mourning, said a bystander who took pictures of the beatings and posted them on overseas websites.

      "A man from Henan province was beaten badly. His left eyeball looked like it was beaten out of its socket and he had a one inch cut to his right eye," said the man who requested anonymity.

      "An elderly woman from Shandong province was beaten to a point where she couldn't move and a man from Hunan province was also beaten," he said.

      Police shouted at the petitioners that Zhao, who spent nearly 16 years under house arrest until his death last week, was a "political criminal," the witness said.

      "They said: 'Why are you commemorating him? You're clearly opposing the government. But the petitioners said 'We think differently. We think he's a good person."

      Also last week, an estimated 80 to 90 petitioners were rounded up near Zhao's traditional courtyard home in Beijing for trying to get inside to pay respects and express condolences to his family, petitioners said.

      "In our petitioners' hostel, all 10 people who went were detained and held from from 9 am to 11 pm," said Bai Shuhua, one of the 10.

      "In the police station, they said 'You don't seek leaders who are alive, but insist on seeking dead leaders. How can the dead help you?" Bai said.

      One of the petitioners, Liu Hongbo, was punched twice as he yelled "Zhao didn't do anything wrong," Bai said.

      Zhao, prime minister and head of the Communist Party for much of the 1980s, died on January 17 at the age of 85.

      The authorities fear his death and funeral on Saturday will be a rallying point for dissidents, petitioners and people dissatisfied with the government.

      Zhao was purged for opposing the military crackdown on the 1989 Tiananmen Square pro-democracy protests in which hundreds, if not thousands, were killed.

      China announced last week it would not hold memorial services for Zhao but only a "farewell activity for the body," which is effectively a funeral.

      In China it is common practice for bodies to be cremated rather than buried.

      But family members and the government have been in dispute over the official assessment of Zhao, the guest list and where his ashes should be placed.

      These issues have yet to be resolved, a family friend told AFP, despite agreement on the date for the funeral.

      "The official assessment is still under discussion," said the friend, who asked not to be identified.

      Asked which government officials might attend to pay their respects, the friend said: "It is still unclear."

      Diplomatic sources told AFP last week that Premier Wen Jiabao paid a secret visit to the man, who used to be his boss, two weeks before he died but there was no word on whether he would attend the funeral.

      Wen was famously pictured standing next to Zhao on Tiananmen Squar

    13. Re:Let's get something straight here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And really, has "freedom of religion" worked that well for us? You give an inch and they'll take a mile. If religion were sensibly outlawed, we could avoid all the annoying prudence patrols, church ladies and theocracy lovers. Maybe we'd even look at fixing the planet before something really bad happens.

      Without the crutch of an afterlife, we might even push for "peace on earth".

      I'm not saying outlay relgious observance, just organized religion. Look how letting the 700 club organize their coup against Clinton turned out? Look at the tyranny that can develop once Bush achieves his Theocracy (just one more "accident" away). And just how many times do we have to give God money before he's happy? Isn't having the Universe enough?

      Wow, if this isn't a great troll...

    14. Re:Let's get something straight here. by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      We have a higher percentage of citizens in prison.

      We are now hearing a LOT about torture and depriving citizens of their rights.

      We are developing Goolags around the world and in fact have already "disappeared" foreign nationals to a torture camp in Afghanistan. In Guantanamo, there are more than 1,200 people and only one conviction. Secrecy only helps the tyrants and we have a lot of secrecy right now.

      The US has sponsored many tyrannical regimes around the world and sponsored death squads and the overthrow of Democratic governments (just look at Chili during Nixon and now what is happening to Venezuela). If you want to know more, read; "Confessions of a Corporate Hitman". If you can't find a few thousand reports around the globe of US involvement in these attoricities--then you really don't care to know.

      So, the downside of our "cowboy macho" is that we don't have much to say to anyone anymore about human rights. I am not being a "blame America first" liberal on this. I've been a Dem, and Independant and a Republican. But the truth is that much of what the CIA does and the military, is for the benefit of corporations, and in many cases against the interests of the citizens.

      I don't know the details about China, but I suspect that it is a simpler way of life, and that every stream isn't fenced and every action doesn't produce a lawsuit. And the oppression that occurred in Tianamin Square (sp?) was wrong and heavy handed. Our government wouldn't do that because, for the moment, it would be hard to get away with and it would cost a lot of air time on Fox News and Republican Radio to make people think that these patriots were terrorists. But don't believe that they couldn't, because you and I still don't know what happened with 9/11.

      I used to see China in a more negative light. But they are actually opening up--they just can't let lose the flood gates with that many people in an agrarian society. China becoming like the US overnight would be a catastrophy--you couldn't support that many cars and roads and donut shops. They don't have the natural resources and the world doesn't have enough oil.

      So I think in China, you trade one type of freedom; "expressing anything in public and buying everything you don't need" for another; "walking across somebody's lawn and not dealing with liability lawsuits".

      The most salient point is that in China, the authorities wield absolute, arbitrary power over you.
      I totally agree that that is a major issue. But what I have always heard from NeoCons in the US is that we need to be tougher on crime. Civil liberties and rights to trial get in the way of law enforcement. Punish! And if we kill a few innocent people when we execute, so be it.

      I would rather trade a higher crime rate than to have to live in a totalitarian state where somebody in power can just decide they don't like you. But secrecy and non-accountability allow for this oppression. And we now have the foundation laid for such tyranny in the United States of America.

      So, I think China does sound like a good idea, because they are moving toward the Liberal ideals that made America great--while we have totally forgotten what actually worked in America. We are more cold-hearted, greedy and ignorant than we used to be.

      The down-side is that Chinas fast-growing economy is going to be in trouble because they have not secured enough energy resources. And they will be short of fresh water. So it could get pretty tough there pretty soon, especially if their climate changes rapidly as well.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    15. Re:Let's get something straight here. by IdahoEv · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For the same reason why Europeans think we're a country of hicks driving around in a pickup with shotguns

      From the city, are ya? I'm in Los Angeles now, but all my relatives live in either Texas or Idaho, and not always in the big cities. I know an awful lot of people who do, in fact, drive around in pickups and carry shotguns.

      In fact, if you are one of the millions of people who live or work in the country, on a ranch, on a farm, or go hunting, you're describing basic tools of life.

      The U.S. still has a lot more "wild" urban acreage per capita than tha majority of European nations. So sure, the whole country isn't toting guns in a pickup at any one point, but enough people are (relative to european nations) that the stereotype may in fact have some merit.

      who elected a idiot to office

      There's a stereotype with 100% merit. (Well, 51% per-capita)

      While it may sound like the Chinese police force operate a Gestapo-like regime but that's far from the truth.

      Are we talking about the country that ran over student protestors with tanks, or not? The Gestapo wasn't breaking down every door to oversee every activity, either -- still the vast majority of Germans were "good citizens" with jobs etc. and had no hassle from the police. (Otherwise how would they have managed to fight a war?) The critical difference was that they used brutal tactics for the people they *did* oversee.

      Not that I think the "Gestapo" metaphor really is apt for China, but you seem to have a misunderstanding of it.

      --
      I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
    16. Re:Let's get something straight here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poor example, I think, because as an American born and bred I'm here to testify that we really are a country of hicks driving around in pickups with shotguns who freely elected an idiot to the highest office in the land. That weakens your argument. It's not to say you aren't correct, you just could have picked a better example to illustrate your point.

      It reminds me of the time I was on a flight and discovered that the person sitting next to me worked in a law office. We got to chatting, and I mentioned how the stereotype of people who work with computers that is perpetuated in the media is actually pretty far from the truth. I said I figured the picture of lawyers as basically soulless, self-centered, avaricious money-grubbers ruled by ambition without any real concern for ethics or morality was probably pretty far off the mark when you get to know them, too. She said, nope, that particular stereotype is actually pretty close to the truth from her experience. I kinda didn't know what to say after that.

    17. Re:Let's get something straight here. by tengwar · · Score: 1

      Well, I was visiting my wife's family, and they were insistent that we only use the best restaurants for reasons of hygiene (actually even the smallest ones seemed clean to me). The problem is that the best restaurants don't generally serve what I would think of as meat, and the cooking isn't what I'm used to from Chinese restaurants in the UK. I've had cold pressed pig's ear, chicken feet, sheep's face, and some fronded stuff that I thought might be seaweed but turned out to be shredded cow's stomach. I won't count the pig's trotters as I used to eat those at university. My brother-in-law did get some durian (look it up), but I didn't get a chance to try that. One thing I recommend is Dong Po pork - basically a two-inch cube taken from the outside of a pig, served in a rich sauce. The dumplings are great too, similar to ravioli with a variety of fillings.

    18. Re:Let's get something straight here. by kevcol · · Score: 1

      "We are developing Goolags around the world and in fact have already "disappeared" foreign nationals"

      Hmm... and about 5 minutes from me is Google Labs.. and a great many foreign and domestic engineers have "disappeared" there...

      Coincidence? I think not!

    19. Re:Let's get something straight here. by 808140 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Are we talking about the country that ran over student protestors with tanks, or not?

      How about opening fire on 10,000 men, women and children, peacefully gathered to celebrate a religious festival?

      Oh wait, that wasn't China! That was Britain!

      I guess the British ought to be described, to this day, as a nation ruled by a gestapo-like military, eh?

      Oh but wait you say, that tragedy happened a long time ago.

      So, believe it or not, did Tiananmen. Politically, 1989 was an eternity ago. But it's difficult to make this clear to someone who hasn't bothered to go to China and witness how much the nation has changed, politically and socially, since those years.

      Which is not to say that it's perfect, but the days of the lone student standing in front of a tank are well behind us.

    20. Re:Let's get something straight here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, we don't do that often enough ...

      This country is turning into a soft nation of government dependant modern serfs just like your average European nation.
      We are not all that different than they are - just we haven't declined as fast as they did being a younger nation but we are right there behind them.
      This is how great civilizations end - they simply get weak and childish , pampered with rights for every one regardless of how self-destructive it becomes - ripe for taking by anyone with balls.
      It happened before (Romans ) and it will happen again.

    21. Re:Let's get something straight here. by TitanBL · · Score: 1

      China is not 1984. Repeat after me, China is not 1984. China is not EastAsia.

      China is not 1984. China is not 1984. China is not EastAsia.
      China is not 1984. China is not 1984. China is not EastAsia.
      China is not 1984. China is not 1984. China is not EastAsia.

      WAR IS PEACE

      FREEDOM IS SLAVERY

      IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

      - Ministry of Truth

    22. Re:Let's get something straight here. by the+mad+hungo · · Score: 0

      "didn't know what to say"? You should have stripped off her dress and fucked the living shit out of her right there. But because you are a pasty-faced geek twat with no social skills whatsoever, that failed to happen. I gues the stereotypes about people who work with computers is dead-on balls accurate after all.

    23. Re:Let's get something straight here. by kibler · · Score: 1

      Politically, 1989 was an eternity ago.

      There is a glaring fallacy in your analogy. 1989 was not an eternity ago. Many of the same people in charge in 1989 are still in charge. China hasn't changed. The people are still not free, just ask any ole' Falun Gong member. Oh wait, you can't find them because they have to meet secretly so that they won't be shot or jailed. No nation that forces its citizens to have abortions is a free or "improved" nation.

      the days of the lone student standing in front of a tank are well behind us.

      Only because the students are afraid to stand up for what they believe, especially when the rest of the free world won't stand with them.

    24. Re:Let's get something straight here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, sir, am that hick with said pickup and shotgun and voted for just such an idiot! Thank you, evlybloody.

    25. Re:Let's get something straight here. by IdahoEv · · Score: 1

      Point made that Tienamen was a while back. However, if you want to make a counter point about Britain, using an item from five times as long ago and during a global war isn't the most convincing.

      Another responder to your post pointed out that many of the same people are still in charge, since Tienamen was only 15 years ago. Likewise, many still remember watching it on TV, including myself. You can't say either of those things about the 1919 incident you cite.

      Anyhow, plenty of examples still exist of dictatorial overreaching by the Chinese government (Taiwan, executions, public canings, etc.), though obviously none so spectacular as the tanks.

      However, you might be surprised to find that I agree with you about reform in China, in fact I regularly use the ongoing reforms in that country as an example of what happens to totalitarian nations they are engaged and traded with rather than saber-rattled against or invaded: the inflow of trade sparks economic reforms which invariably bring about social change and liberal reforms.

      My point to the grandparent was not that China is totally evil, but that he was misunderstanding his own metaphor. he argued that China was not like "the gestapo", because it wasn't observing every citizen all the time and breaking down doors for every minor offense. My point was that 1984 description wasn't accurate for the gestapo, either, who were defined more by their brutal tactics in response to certain "offenses" than some hypothetical micromanaging of everyone's lives down to the last trivial misdemeanor.

      --
      I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
    26. Re:Let's get something straight here. by 808140 · · Score: 1

      With respect, the man that gave the order to use force as necessary, Deng Xiao Ping, is dead.

      Look, I'm not saying that Tiananmen square was a good thing, anymore than I would go ahead and say that Britain's massacre of Indians was a good thing, but to me, the circumstances are similar: both involved a grassroots movement to essentially overthrow (or at least, radically change the workings of) the people in power.

      Both cases led to a brutal crackdown. A crackdown which, actually, was far more brutal in the British case. We conveniently ignore it, or justify it, in the case of the British, because they are our allies and they largely share our values, culture and way of life.

      The Chinese, on the other hand, are culturally, linguistically, and economically dissimilar to us -- at least, we perceive them to be (in the case of economics, the differences aren't actually so great). So it's easy for us to find reasons to despise them.

      Your comment about students being afraid to stand up for what they believe in being the reason that we haven't seen another uprising against the government couldn't be further from the truth.

      The students that congregated on the square faced a much sterner, less forgiving government than students now would face. They were, in their own words, "ready to die" -- many painted those characters on their foreheads and persons. But those were much more desperate times. The USSR was undergoing glastnost, and Gorbachev was in Beijing to talk about that. The Chinese government's flirtations with the free market were still largely just that, flirtations, and much of China's population lived in poverty. The nation was not stable. These desperate times led people to take desperate measures.

      Nowadays, most people still empathise with the students -- but they no longer see as pressing a need. In their minds, the government was right not to pursue the glastnost-style reforms that the students wanted at the time, because they don't want China to end up like the USSR (ie, gone). The government's position -- economic reform and growth before political reform -- is one they agree with. They are skeptical about whether the government will actually go through with democratic reforms, but the need is less pressing -- China is increasingly an affluent, stable place. Not many people are starving anymore, and most people see opportunity where there wasn't any 20 years ago.

      Criticisms that locals here have of the government are typically things like the "peasant problem" (the ever widening affluence gap between urban and peasant populations), and censorship.

      The former is the stated "big issue" for the Hu Jin Tao government. The latter is an on-going problem, but one that is decreasing: China has money on its mind and direct censorship is bad for business, so increasingly, the Chinese government is adopting more subtle propaganda via education and manipulation of the media. People are still aware of it and annoyed by it, but what with the way Jiang Zi Min got bitten in the ass over the whole SARS cover up, the Chinese are mostly optimistic that this is getting better.

      Much better than Singapore, where the government taps all phone lines. Of course, we don't ever talk about Singapore, but then, they're capitalist, right?

    27. Re:Let's get something straight here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you think the Chinese is some sort of omni-present superpower that oversees all of the minute details of its citizens' lives and takes sadistic pleasure in torture.

      Yes, after PATRIOT, Guatanomo, Abu Ghraib, "unlawful combatants," parts of PATRIOT II, MATRIX, and parts of the now-renamed TIA, not to mention RFID, Doubleclick, and a plethora of commercial databases with dossiers for sale to anyone including government, it's easy for Americans to assume that China might be like that, too.

  169. Ever bought anything made in china? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, thought so.

  170. ssh & socks proxy by Yeb · · Score: 1
    If you have ssh access to any box outside the firewall, you create tunnel to it and then surf. This is true whether you are in china or wherever else... Simply:
    ssh -D 8080 [remote-host]
    Now in your web browser, set:

    SOCKS Host: Localhost
    Port: 8080

    So now all connections go Firefox->localhost:8080->[remote-host]->www

    All access (e.g. apache logs) will show things coming from [remote-host]. The connection between your localbox and [remote-host] will be encrypted using ssh.

    -Jeff

  171. Spot the Fed! by Mr.+BS · · Score: 1

    Looks like Def-Con's famous game made it to /. cause I just found him! Great article Agent Smith!

  172. What a great post....... NOT! by BreAkBeAts · · Score: 1

    I cant beleave someone would use slashdot to dig up ways to get around the Chinese Web Security, Shame on you!

  173. Don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't do it.
    I tried to put one over on them once, and it cost me 4 years of my life in the worst rat infested shithole you could possibly imagine.

    If the guards don't like you, they beat the crap out of you.
    They force a few litres of water down your throght and then bounce you up and down (very painful).
    They isolate you from everything. The only thing to keep you company is the rats chewing on your flesh. The only thing you see is a hand that shoves a bowl of food through a little hole in the door, and the rats won't even touch it.

    If you survive and get out, you will never have a decent nights sleep again.

    Trust me, it's not worth it.

  174. Controversial news and blog sites are blocked by RonBarr · · Score: 2, Informative

    And they change daily. When I was there for a few months last summer, all British news sites (BBC, Guardian, etc.) were blocked. Google groups are blocked. The SF Chronicle would be up and down depending on the day, as would Yahoo news. In general, web access is completely problematic. Earlier posters are correct - unless you are trying to do something to educate the masses, you'll be fine. They aren't after knowledgeable individuals or foreigners, they want to make sure it's not easy to join an emerging movement. Even if they were, it would only result in a bribe unless you were to be made into an example. By the way, China is lovely. The people are very sweet and warm. If you can, learn some Mandarin or Cantonese before you get there.

  175. Sourceforge? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    So sourceforge is banned? No wonder RedFlag Linux is taking so long...

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  176. WOW by northcat · · Score: 1

    How pretentious and hypocritical.

  177. If you ask an average Internet user in China by manifoldronin · · Score: 1

    chances are the answer would be, "censorship? What censorship?"

    --
    Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
  178. And next... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll be wondering why 127.0.0.1 is unreachable!

  179. Like that russian guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean like that Russian cracker who hacked the Adobe e-book format and even had the gaul to come to a conference here and talk about it. And wow did the slashdot community whine.

    1. Re:Like that russian guy by bbc · · Score: 1

      "You mean like that Russian cracker who hacked the Adobe e-book format and even had the gaul to come to a conference here and talk about it. And wow did the slashdot community whine."

      The problem the (predominantly American) Slashdot community had was that the Russian cracker guy had not actually broken a law, or done anything immoral.

  180. I just returned from living in China. by obviousfakename · · Score: 1

    I was living in central China (Zhengzhou) for 10 months. Chinese people, and the Chinese government are actually really laid back, especially when it comes to foreigners. Unless you are actively trying to incite some kind of social unrest, they will treat you extremely well.

    The only thing I ever had accessing on the net was Google's cache.

    On the plus side, I paid $7 USD per month for a nearly 2Mbit dsl. Bittorrent all day long without fear of MPAA/RIAA. Maybe you could set up a supernova repacement while you're there? ;)

  181. Paranoid Obsevation by Fyoozen · · Score: 1

    First, how does anyone know who you really are? You could be gathering info on people here or learning how people circumvent things to bypass controls and tighten the noose harder.

    Second, if you are heading that way, would you really jeopardize your own safety by posting to a public forum?

    Third, and last, what s the reward for turning in someone who would fink on their peers or try to subvert the country? I could win this one either way! The bottom line, exercise more caution and discretion for your and your family's protection.
    Dictatorships are what they are and I have seen many executed because of lesser infractions.

    --
    Semper BS-us! He has a wife you know...
  182. MOD PARENT UP by adiposity · · Score: 1

    lol, this is hilarious

  183. To the RESPECT Poster by the0ther · · Score: 0

    Do not respect the laws of China, as one poster said. As if your government will let China imprison a US citizen on political crimes. Fuck the Chinese. On another note, I was reading John P. Barlow's blog...he was talking about VOIP phone conversations with girls in China. He said he tried out a few Google queries (and websites) you might expect to be blocked by China. He said they were not. I imagine the Great Firewall of China is actually a piece of sh1t, a lot like other goods made in China.

  184. secret techniques to bypass chinese filtering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't go to China.

  185. Go ahead and break their laws... by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

    Remember the kind in '94 that was caned in Singapore for Chewing Gum (or was it Vandalism..) and President Clinton had to ask the gov't to lesson the penalty....

    Caning is real... hope you've got thick pants.

    Go ahead and break their laws... you'll be on the 6pm News here in the states... with your pants around your ankles..

    *WHACK* "I just wanted to read /." *WHACK*

  186. Have you ever BEEN to CHINA? by Xiaotou · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have. It really opened my eyes to the freedoms we enjoy versus the freedoms they enjoy.

    I have family in Shanghai (huge city), Xi'an (pretty big city), BaoJi City (Medium-sized city), and a small villiage nearby. I have travelled to all of these places and stayed wih my relatives. As a native-born American, I was thoroughly impressed with the freedom that they enjoy.

    Many Chinese never even come in contact with a Policeman. Judges and government officials (my cousin is a Provincial (read: State) Supreme Court Judge, and her husband is a high-ranking government official, BTW) live like common "folk," and people do and say almost anything they want. My nephews all play Counterstrike on-line against their classmates, and they all surf the internet. You have to understand that Chinese people are just not into Pr0n and such things like we (Americans) are. So, for them, not having access to Pr0n just isn't a big deal.

    But hey, don't take my word for it. Go see for yourself.

    Oh, and the one baby thing is only enforced in the big cities. Again, don't take my word for it. Most of my family in the smaller areas have several children.

    1. Re:Have you ever BEEN to CHINA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a native-born Chinese, I don't agree with you totally - maybe 50%. "Most of my family in the smaller areas have several children." - The families at the top (the ones with money and power) can do it. As well as the bottom ones who don't care anything. For normal Chinese, they can also have several children if they don't care about career and fine.

    2. Re:Have you ever BEEN to CHINA? by myside · · Score: 1
      You have to understand that Chinese people are just not into Pr0n and such things like we (Americans) are.

      Yeah, I hate it when Americans generalize about the Chinese - almost as much as when Americans generalize about Americans.

    3. Re:Have you ever BEEN to CHINA? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The difference?

      In China, all the freedoms they enjoy are granted to them by the government -- and while they may be quite laissez-faire at the moment, their freedom can be revoked at almost any time for almost any reason.

      In the United States, our freedoms are held to be innate and self-evident. That means if our government wants to take our freedoms away, they have to move slowly enough that we don't notice.

    4. Re:Have you ever BEEN to CHINA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know enough yet. Also, your family background is specialy.

      Do you know for chinese citizen they need a government permit to enter Shanghai, Shenzhen, Beijing? They don't even have right to go where they want to in their own country. Imagine you need a passport to enter New York City, and it will be inspected upon entering the city.

    5. Re:Have you ever BEEN to CHINA? by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "The mountains are high and the emperor is far away."

    6. Re:Have you ever BEEN to CHINA? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ...if our government wants to take our freedoms away, they have to move slowly enough that we don't notice.

      Except when there's a terrorist attack. Or something else that makes it onto the TV and can cause people to panic.

    7. Re:Have you ever BEEN to CHINA? by AutoTheme · · Score: 1

      Oh, and the one baby thing is only enforced in the big cities.

      Ahh, O.K. Now that's different!

    8. Re:Have you ever BEEN to CHINA? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      What you describe is not that unusual for "simple, poor, and honest" folk living in any country.

      A government has to be INCREDIBALLY bad (as in expect a revolution that year) if it can not provide for the simple, poor, honest folk in a straightforward manner. (i.e. no government contact)

      What freedom does is allow you to become rich, and try to be smarter than the people running the government. Only then do you have problems when the government realizes "hey, these people are doing things we haven't regulated yet", or "hey, they are complaining about our mistake, and by doing that giving me a bad name".

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    9. Re:Have you ever BEEN to CHINA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That means if our government wants to take our freedoms away, they have to move slowly enough that we don't notice.

      And by now they have moved far enough and in the last 3 years not that slowly enough. Don't you notice?

    10. Re:Have you ever BEEN to CHINA? by kibler · · Score: 1

      Whew! Thanks for clearing that up for me. I have a new found respect for the Chinese government since they don't force all women to abort their 2nd child.

    11. Re:Have you ever BEEN to CHINA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been to china and as far as I understood of the 1 baby rule was..

      - You could have more but they were classed as non-citizens.
      - You could have more if you were given permission to in certain instances.
      - Han race get priority over other races in that they will eventually breed out the minorities.

    12. Re:Have you ever BEEN to CHINA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government doesn't "force" anyone, you stupid cretin. It's down to financial incentives.

      Clearly you know absolutely nothing about China, but you're some arrogant loser who sits at his computer believing he can describe the world from his sheltered life!

    13. Re:Have you ever BEEN to CHINA? by AutoTheme · · Score: 1

      Sorry... You stupid chinc or pinko-commy, whatever... I know nothing about China actually, I was just responding to the insane "Oh, and the one baby thing is only enforced in the big cities.". Specifically the "ENFORCED" part. Ohh, and maybe the "ONE BABY THING".

  187. Use the Great VPN out of china... by voxel · · Score: 0
    There are many VPN services to get you out to the real world, just google for them.

    One is: http://www.findnot.com ($6.21/mo)

    Then you can do whatever you want, and tell the chinese goverment to fuck right off... but don't say that outloud, they might hear you.

    infact, disregard this message entirely.. ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H
    <NO CARRIER>
    --
    Modesty is one of life's greatest attributes
  188. my view from a Hong Kong native by HayCheng · · Score: 1

    you will have all the freedom you want if you are going to Hong Kong and Mocow. You probably wont go into any trouble unless you are starting a campaign against the Chinese government. By then, you would not have to worry. The local will be angry enough and start their own compaign against you anyway. While some of the people may not have much love to the current government, Chinese, other than Taiwan, are very supportive for a united China. As for China itself, it is relative free nowaday. You can ever talk about politic and religious as long as you are not trying to spread your idea. The problem is the law is much stricter. There may be a time they want to enforce those laws and you will be get into trouble. By the way, do not expect US can get you out. In certain situation, the Chinese are expecting their government to act tough. If you are bringing Bible or such, just bring a copy for your own use. There were people who bought Bible to undergroud church and were put in prsion.

  189. a little help by fliptout · · Score: 1

    For education purposes, the PRC uses the pinyin romanization system.

    I'm not familiar with your spellings of chinese words, maybe they are wade-giles.

    Anywho, china is zhong guo, USA is mei guo, England is ying guo, Japan is ri ben(which whimsically can be translated as "fuck one's self"), South Korea is han guo, France is fa guo.

    Many of the chinese people i met hold america in high esteem. Thank you, Backstreet Boys.

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
  190. Good luck... by mdvolm · · Score: 1

    I can't believe that the poster is serious about moving to China of all places to enjoy more freedoms.

    Good luck pleading your "rights" when you get caught reading a website you're not supposed to, or even receiving anything resembling due process.

    You may take your freedoms to China, but they will promptly be stripped from you at the door.

  191. Obvious Point: Torture of Rebiya Kadeer by reporter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The obvious point in the original article starting this whole discussion is that the writer is clueless and takes a cavalier attitude towards, not only the Beijing authorities, but also towards the people who have been tortured by those authorities. Click on this link to learn about Rebiya Kadeer. Today, I received information from Amnesty International (AI), and it was an urgent plea to us in the AI community to help Rebiya. She has languished for several years in a Chinese prison.

    What was her crime? He wanted to mail copies of publicly available news articles to her husband residing in the USA. The articles dealt with the plight of women in Chinese society. She is serving an 8 year prison sentence, starting in 2000.

    Is anyone angered by this incident? I was infuriated when I received the documents from AI. Visiting China may be "safe" for foreigners, but should we not express our moral outrage by boycotting China and its products?

  192. SSH by prizog · · Score: 4, Informative

    When I was there in September, SSHing to my shell account worked just fine. Tunnel through that, and you'll be fine.

    If you're going to do human rights work there, that it's probably best to do one illegal thing at a time. So, don't look at porn when your issue is Falun Gong. And likewise, don't look at Falun Gong sites if your issue is porn.

    If you're just on vacation, consider spending your time seeing the sites rather than surfing the net. It'll be there when you get home.

    Ignore all the idiots on this site who tell you to obey unjust laws.

    1. Re:SSH by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      ...consider spending your time seeing the sites rather than surfing the net.

      Wow. That's a great Freudian typo. 'Seeing the sites' is surfing the net. :)

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    2. Re:SSH by prizog · · Score: 1

      Unless you mean archeological sites.

      But I'll admit that it was a typo -- when I was there, I mostly did mountains and temples.

    3. Re:SSH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ignore all the idiots on this site who tell you to obey unjust laws.

      I don't see too many people advocating that. I do see a lot of people advocating awareness of the risks of disobeying said laws.

    4. Re:SSH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there any good steganography apps running around?? i dimmly remmeber the cDc talking about making something and then...pooof!.....i dont remember hearing anything.....

    5. Re:SSH by Dwonis · · Score: 1, Informative
    6. Re:SSH by prizog · · Score: 1

      Sure, but this guy wants to do things that are illegal there anyway.

    7. Re:SSH by justins · · Score: 1
      If you're going to do human rights work there, that it's probably best to do one illegal thing at a time. So, don't look at porn when your issue is Falun Gong. And likewise, don't look at Falun Gong sites if your issue is porn.

      Damn. I would miss all the porno websites offering hot Falun Gong-on-Falun Gong action. :(
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  193. Enforcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is illegal for someone under the age of 18 to surf pr0n in the United States. How many kids go to jail for surfing pr0n? zero.

    Just becasue its a law doesn't mean its going to be renforced.

    I'm not saying you should break the laws, but you most likely won't be sent jail if you go and surf some potentially dangerous website.

  194. slashdot and sourceforge are NOT banned! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sheesh this is pathetic.

    neither slashdot nor sourceforge, nor google, nor yahoo groups, or about HALF the lists or names of sites I've seen are banned or blocked in any way from china. even CNN, etc its all accessable.

    I just came back from china after being there for almost a month and I was quite happily surfing these sites from every place I visited, even remote small towns with little internet cafes. everywhere.

    the censorship BS is just that, BS. heck, even playboy was accessible... sheesh.

    how pathetic. no wonder the US is doing so bad. china will walk right in and scoop up control.
    sigh....

  195. Kent State by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    Is still remembered and mourned in the US. Tiannamen Square is a "non-event" in China.

    1. Re:Kent State by LWATCDR · · Score: 0, Troll

      That is because.
      Tiannamen never happened.
      Was totally justified.
      The peoples Army of China was protecting the people of China.

      I do not hate the Chinese. Frankly I have hope that they are slowly sliding towards Freedom. It may take time but it will happen. Then the Chinese people will mourn for the people at Tiannamen.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  196. My girlfriend is currently in China.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And when we're talking on the phone, she won't even let me mention or joke about things like Taiwan independence, Fa Lun Gong, or Tibet. Most Chinese are like this because they know that the phone lines are all listened to, and they don't want to be mistaken for troublemakers.

    This is the main reason why China has 1 billion+ people under their control... most Chinese don't want to cause problems and would rather live in the system than defy it.

    If you go to China with the intent of breaking rules, and stuff, you will probably be ratted out by a fellow co-worker, and the local cop (of which there are a lot of) will probably be notified.

    You probably won't go to jail or tortured or anything like that, but you will most probably lose your computers and be extradited.

    This isn't the United States, this is China and you have no rights whatsoever. If you go there with plans of subverting control, your are risking causing some really unnecessary problems for yourself.

    1. Re:My girlfriend is currently in China.... by LeiGong · · Score: 1
      ...the phone lines are all listened to, and they don't want to be mistaken for troublemakers...

      Ok, I think you're being just a *tad* bit paranoid. Without even having to going to the logistical issues, I'll solve this with math. Let's say the average Chinese makes 15 minutes in phone calls a day. That about 1.11% of the day spent on the phone. With a population of 1.3billion, that equates to about 325,000,000 hours of phone time. Assuming each eavesdroppers listens in for 10 hours a day (Hey, the Chinese work hard to oppress their people!) that's 32,500,000 people working for the Ministry of Information. In otherwords, the entire nation of Canada would have to work for the Chinese government to make sure people aren't talking about overthrowing the nation...

    2. Re:My girlfriend is currently in China.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of digital voice recognition...

    3. Re:My girlfriend is currently in China.... by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

      In otherwords, the entire nation of Canada would have to work for the Chinese government to make sure people aren't talking about overthrowing the nation...

      I KNEW the Canadians were behind this!!

      "And I would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for you meddling Canadians!"

    4. Re:My girlfriend is currently in China.... by Ozette · · Score: 1

      this is true, but alas, most people in China don't have phoens. And if they only want to listen to the foreigners, it's much easier.

    5. Re:My girlfriend is currently in China.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For your information, at the end of 2004, China has 0.33 billion cell phone users, and 0.313 billion fix line telephone users. And the penetration rate is 24.8% and 24.5% respectively. That means there is one cell phone user among every four persons.

      Next time when you go to China, do not be surprised when you see homeless people use cell phones to contact their fellows.

    6. Re:My girlfriend is currently in China.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is China we are talking about. They still use surveilance satelites that take film photographs.

  197. Nobody is talking about rebellions. by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    To stomp out violent protest, or terrorist acts is fine, every government has to deal with that forcefully.

    To silence nonviolent people who simply dissagree with the way things are and argue for change is a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

    I'm sure your commie asses are going to claim the USA does the same thing. To prove you wrong I say the following

    George Bush has the diplomatic skills of a mentally retarded badger, and His daughers are way hot and I hope they show up in Playboy Magazine!!.

    I have every confidence I will still be alive and free tomorrow despite just saying that stuff.

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
    1. Re:Nobody is talking about rebellions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure your commie asses are going to claim the USA does the same thing. To prove you wrong I say the following

      George Bush has the diplomatic skills of a mentally retarded badger, and His daughers are way hot and I hope they show up in Playboy Magazine!!.


      Really? Wow, you are brave. Hey, why not try that at his next public speaking event (if you can call his farcical use of english speaking), see how well you fare. Others have tried recently, they seem to end up in jail.

    2. Re:Nobody is talking about rebellions. by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 1
      Holy smokes, Timmy, what balls you have to post such inflammatory comments here on Slashdot using your undoubtedly real name.

      Show up at a "debate" and say any of those things through a bullhorn and then I'll give you a high-five. Once you are released, that is.

      I think it's awesome that americans really believe that they're free souls; It proves that Althusser was right.

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
    3. Re:Nobody is talking about rebellions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please explain why nonviolent people can kill a decent number of apparently fully armed and trigger happy soliders (in tanks mind you) at 6/4? The situation is far more complex than that with the majority of demonstrator been nonviolent students and a small number of violent mob that is postively vicious. In any country, if you defy a military curfew and physically attack the guys with guns, you die. If you want violent revolution, bring some guns next time.

      Not that I'm saying that 6/4 is not a tragic event. It is indeed. However most people have no clue as to what really happened.

    4. Re:Nobody is talking about rebellions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha U really think Timmy is my name :) I hope they thow that fucker in a hig securty prison

  198. .lliks lufesu a stI by abb3w · · Score: 1

    .semoceb ysae sdrawkcab gnidaer ,netsil ouy elihw a adoY retsaM ot fi dnA

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    1. Re:.lliks lufesu a stI by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      ?"ouy" s'ohW

  199. Welp.. by Marthisdil · · Score: 1

    Guess you don't want to ever have more than 1 kid, without state sponsorship, eh? Trying to work around their measures to keep freedoms from happening, can ultimately result in your imprisonment or worse....

  200. Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You buy a product with known specs (moving to China, you know what you are getting into), you live with it. Laws are laws. There may be no country on the planet where the laws are just, fair, and sensible, but there is sufficient variation that if you can afford migration, you can pick the one most like your ideal. That said, once you get there, expect to be stuck with it until you move again.

    If you don't like the rules, play a different game. If you want to change the rules, have a good strategy and don't whine if you get crushed in the process.

    In practicality, if you are caught breaking the law, you'll either be deported or treated like anyone else that broke "the rules" (which, by the way, is your responsibility to learn; even in the US where it's illegal to eat peanuts in church in some states). If you are deported. Well, let's just say you better like where you came from, because you won't be leaving there...

  201. Wtf mods? by rbarreira · · Score: 1

    +3 Insightful? Have you really READ the post? Or did it only sound good when you "read" it diagonally without thinking? Other replies to the parent (obviously an AC troll) have already pointed out his BS...

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  202. All these replies are off topic by wsanders · · Score: 1

    Of course, with the right connections you will have the freedom to pirate as many copies of Windows XP as you want - what's there to complain about?

    But: Looking a for a good answer to the original question: How easy is it and to what extent are the internet and more generally freedom of press restrictions, evaded in China.

    A good analogy is "Reading Lolita in Tehran" by Azar Nafisi (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/081 297106X/qid=1106863068/sr=8-1/ref=pd_csp_1/102-100 7484-7830549?v=glance&s=books&n=507846)

    which is a book about how and by whom the restictions in Iran are evaded by those who the regime in Iran has tried to crush, and probably by sterner measures than those employed in China.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  203. The Worst 'Ask Slashdot' Response Ever by spamania · · Score: 1

    I'm trying hard not to flame anyone in particular, so bear with me...

    I am embarrassed by the majority of the responses to this post. I understand that there will be a few "Chinese prison" jokes as well as a few "follow the rules or go somewhere else" posts, but I think it is sad that nearly every single response to this guy's questions falls along these lines.

    It is perfectly legitimate to enquire about ways to circumvent an oppresive government. It's part of the set of freedoms that we should all be demanding, especially if they are not afforded by said government. It's also perfectly legitimate to give such information, FIPO, of course.

    It's perfectly depressing to read a bunch of sardonic "best of luck to ya in a Chinese jail" comments. I can only suspect that the vast majority of these are uninformed. How many of these posters can actually speak to the conditions of Chinese prisons or the fairness of the Chinese legal process? I'd wager a lot of them couldn't even have an informed discussion about such conditions in their own countries. What's certainly true is that no one who made such a comment backed it up with any facts whatsoever.

    I question the likelyhood that trying to circumvent the so-called Great Firewall is going to get this guy into any real trouble. I could be wrong, but a gorvernment with 1 billion plus citizens would seem to have bigger fish to fry (or at least a million or so eqaully large fish, so what are the odds). He's not asking Slashdot how to use technology to shoplift; he's asking Slashdot how to use technology to read Slashdot.

    So, how about we cut the juvenile crap and answer this guy's question?

    --
    My other .sig is a troll.
  204. mod_proxy_html + mod_proxy + https by Kingpin · · Score: 1


    Rent a virtual server outside China, eg. Germany. You can get those at $10 a month w. eg. Debian. Install Apache with above modules and you're set.

    --
    Unable to read configuration file '/bigassraid/htdig//conf/14229.conf'
    Geocrawler error message.
  205. RSOD by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be the RED Screen Of Death in China? :-) I hear it's a special localization by MS.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  206. WARNING... by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

    Any attempt in bypassing the Great Firewall of China will result in sudden cerebral hemorphage induced by a bullet in the back of the head.

    --
    In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
  207. like, as if, and junk by phyruxus · · Score: 1
    I don't know if news sites are blocked in China, but I'm guessing that roughly 0.0% of chinese people are going to respond to your question in a "constructive" way. Can you imagine?

    How-To (Score 1)
    by SumYungGai (1234567890) on Thursday January 27, @29:78AM (#0000000000)

    Hi Solo Han,

    you ask an interesting question. It's not always easy to break the law here in China, and most people don't try because there is the danger of severe treatment if you get caught. The government takes this kind of thing very seriously, and has been known to make "examples" of people. Or not, if they just want the person gone. But anyway, how I get my porn and anti-communist news is basically that I use a satellite phone to dial into foreign dial-up services. It's not really fast, but as long as the government doesn't know about my sat phone, it works great.

    Re:How-To (Score 1)
    by SumYungGai (1234567890) on Thursday January 27, @34:81AM (#0000000000)

    Hey, Solo Han? I kind of got caught by the Chinese police. They've taken my pants and sent someone to get a car battery. Any chance you could send me a few hundred thousand dollars american by wire, asap? I'd really appreciate it. Talk to you soon (I hope) *gulp*

    //end sarcasm

    I'm surprised this story even got posted. I mean, come on, even if we were talking about oh say, england instead of china, your asking how to break the law... majorly. Shouldn't this discussion be conducted on IRC in some "dark alley"? More to the point, shouldn't the real topic (if any) have been "W007! China it teh suck! let's laugh at their firewall! h4wh4wh4w... google firewall piercing.." (p.s. I am not 'elite')

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
  208. VPN solution by iocc · · Score: 1

    I suggest that you setup an encrypted VPN with openvpn.net on a host in a (more) free country. And then tunnel one or more IPs to china. You tunnel EVERYTHING, all traffic..

    As I got one myself I know it works well. But I got it because my ISP refuses to give me 32 IPs with my own reverse, all ports open. And I dont want them to know what files I xfer over BitTorrent or other P2P.

  209. Obviously ... by kitzilla · · Score: 1
    What methods and technologies are you aware of or use to circumvent the Great Firewall of China?

    One that comes to mind immediately is to stay on this side of the firewall.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  210. Re:A friend of mine is there now and has no proble by La+Camiseta · · Score: 1

    Of course, considering that she's your ex, you may just be wanting that to happen ;)

  211. MOD PARENT UP by Infinity+Salad · · Score: 1

    The over-rated post it is referring to is misinformed.

  212. Its just a means to cover the majority... by edeus · · Score: 1

    I have yet to see a privacy, filtering, large firewall that has been able to prevent "our freedoms" without compromise.

    With the advent of so many online anti-privacy resources such as anonymous cloaking (the-cloak.com), tunnelling connections to a another unfiltered location and all the other tricks like masquerading URL's and what have you, I do not believe that the IT literate people of china would be truly prevented from doing as they please.

    If i have said it once, i have said it a thousand times - no "protection" can be 100% secure whilst being 100% functional.

    I would worry more about physical security from Chinese Forces if you are truly wanting to push the imposed limits.

  213. Law Abiding Slashdotters by stygianguest · · Score: 1

    I somehow didn't expect slashdotters to give up their slashdot that easily. I'd think there are a lot of you who aren't following their own laws to the letter. Copyright laws, for example, and do you all stop for a red traffic light? I'm afraid I've broken quite a few laws. Some because it was more convenient to, others because I simply disagree.

    The analogy is flawed though, the risk of being caught for the laws I break is zero. The risks in china seem to be unpredictable , which isn't very promising. But I cannot find any information on how they treat non-chinese. I would expect them to be mild, especially if you're not involved in political activities but reading slashdot. Maybe it's an idea not to encrypt your traffic but use a plain proxyserver. That way they can see you're just accessing slashdot and not organising a coup.

    Of course it's nice of you to worry about him doing illigal stuff in a country like China. But I don't understand that there're are no practical answers being modded up. Only the warnings that say he should adapt to the situation there. Everyone here probably objects strongly to the Chinese censorship, but nobody seems to we willing to take the risk to 'protest' against it. The risk might be very real indeed, but then again, I'd bet laws like these aren't quite the same for foreigners. Maybe someone could enlighten us about the risks involved? Are there any example cases?

  214. Many english news sites banned, also game sites by GlenRaphael · · Score: 1
    Dailygammon.com is a site I helped create for playing backgammon over the web. Our users who visit China say they can't get through to us from there since last week. I thought it was strange that we'd make the list, since we have essentially no political or news focus. Looking at the list of domains known to have been banned, I realized it was probably due to the name -- a lot of english-language newspaper sites have names like dailytribune, dailytelegraph, dailyjournal. Thus, assume you won't be able to access your hometown newspaper without some sort of mechanism in place.

    One easy thing you can do is install this cgi proxy script on some host you know isn't yet banned. Then when you need to surf the web from an internet kiosk or similarly restrictive environment, access all the banned sites by way of that script.

    Or in situations where you have full control of the machine, ssh to a known host on the other side of the firewall and do your surfing from there.

    --
    I play Nerd-Folk!
  215. Don't mourn the old leader: by holysin · · Score: 1

    China rounds up, beats mourners for deposed leader Zhao Well, aside from getting the crap kicked out of you for mourning a leader that was viewed weak on college students (1989) I'm sure it's lovely...

  216. someone who would know.. by Tepshen · · Score: 1

    Ask that guy (Michael something?) who got caned in singapore for vandalism if being an american helped to save his brutalized backside.

    1. Re:someone who would know.. by serbanp · · Score: 1

      This asshole of Michael Fay got what he deserved. Doing what he did should result in punishment regardless of the place on Earth. It's just that SG is (still) more strict in overseeing inappropiate public behavior than many other civilized countries.

      As a side note, it's also easier, because they have to cover only that diminutive territory (probably smaller than NYC) SG is.

  217. How many Republican KKK members have you heard of? by tsch · · Score: 1

    hmmmm...How about DAVID DUKE?

  218. Stay Here in the Land of the Free... by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

    This brings me to my overall question: is the censorship that real, that hard to get around, and how do you do it? What methods and technologies are you aware of or use to circumvent the Great Firewall of China?

    Bear in mind that any breach of the law in China will likely land you in a dingy prison cell for 10 years while they get around to hearing the case, followed by your 10 minute trial (guilty verdict for subversion already stamped and ready to go), and finishing with your 10 years of hard labor in one of their people's work camps. I suggested that you stay here in the United States unless you were born in China and still have family there. I don't know about you, but the only way that I would want to see China is in uniform looking through a gun sight.

  219. wtf... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two things come to mind... Firstly, how do we know that this guy isnt some chineese spy looking for the holes in their firewall. Secondly, if your not a spy, then your just to much of a moron to figure that China has probably already blocked this page (or all of slashdot) for this. And I havent even said anything about the punishment someone might get if they told you how to get around the firewall.

  220. Oh God, why? by FiveArmies · · Score: 1

    "I'm considering a move to China next year..." Wait a minute...is this voluntary? Or forced? Why on God's green earth would anyone want to do that? Don't you see people desperately trying to come in THIS DIRECTION? DUDE, YOU'RE GOING THE WRONG WAY! FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, TURN AROUND!!!! Seriously, if you know what you are getting yourself into, what makes you think they won't kill you if they catch you trying to get around the law? That's a dangerous thing...hence why you shouldn't go there to begin with...

  221. You don't need Pr0n, warez and mp3z by firestarter · · Score: 1

    Chinese markets are great places to get knocked off games, music and DVDs. Even legit music CDs are very cheap in China - I was there in November and picked up some Beatles CDs for $4 each.

    As for pr0n - get yourself a nice Chinese girlfriend for chrissakes! You'll probably be seen as an impressive catch...

    Have fun!

  222. GPRS by tengwar · · Score: 1

    I was in China recently, and I used GPRS devices (a Blackberry and a P800, but a PC with a GPRS modem would also work) to read external sites. GPRS establishes a GTP tunnel to an "APN" in the home network, so it bypasses intervening firewalls. It would be an expensive way of doing all your Internet access, but if you just want to pick up uncensored news it would be workable. ou would need to find a mobile phone company with a roaming agreement in China - I used Vodafone, but I think most companies would be ok.

  223. Re:Well .. smells funny by Tuna_Shooter · · Score: 1

    If i wasn't so anal i'd say this guy was a spy or working for an intelligencia in China.... if he was that smart he'd already know the answer!!!

    --
    *--- Sometimes a majority only means that all the fools are on the same side. ---*
  224. oh SNAP! by SoupGuru · · Score: 1

    zing

    --
    What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
  225. Who asks? by jwr · · Score: 1

    Is that question being asked by a citizen of a country, which prohibits its citizens from going to certain places (Cuba), or buying items from these places? Same country that imprisons people indefinitely in these same places (Cuba: Guantanamo) without trial, pretending that somehow this place is out of its jurisdiction?

    I think it's also the same country that spreads democracy by using it's military force, while being unable to count votes in its own presidential elections...

    Careful: propaganda goes hand in hand with restrictions of freedom. Both exist in the US and it is naive to think otherwise. Don't think you're free just because you live in the US.

    1. Re:Who asks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod down troll or offtopic...whatever suits you We all know the US has it's own problems... That doesn't make the question any less relevant or genuine if it was asked by a US Citizen. Your response, however, is completely irrelevant to the issue at hand. What freedoms will a typical us citizen lose if they decide to up and move to china... How hard is that?

  226. Civil Disobedience by Misanthropy · · Score: 1

    If you value your freedom as much as you suggest, I'd leave the civil disobedience to the people of China.

    Unless you are really trying to make some point, and are willing to risk dealing with the Chinese government, I suggest not circumventing their filters. They don't look too kindly upon people opposing them.

  227. Web surfing by scarolan · · Score: 1

    If you're really freaked out about it, run all your web/internet traffic through an encrypted connection to a proxy server outside china's borders, and run your firefox web browser and putty (or whatever you use for ssh) off an encrypted USB drive. Set it up so your history and cookies are also saved to the USB drive instead of on the home folder on your computer.

  228. You're missing the point of his post. by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    Unless the information he wants to get to is anti-chinese-government, I don't think they will give him any trouble as he's a foreigner. Most of the information blocked is of this sort anyway.

    With that said, trying to circumvent censorship isn't worth the risk. Whenever you're abroad it's a bad idea to engage in criminal activity.

    1. Re:You're missing the point of his post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's just fine when you're at home!

  229. Manifest Destiny by winkydink · · Score: 1

    read a history book

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Manifest Destiny by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Notice it is a history book and not a newspaper. Notice that you have the freedom to bring it up.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Manifest Destiny by winkydink · · Score: 0

      If I lived in China, I'd make sure my family had the money to pay the bill for the bullet the state used to execute me. Different country, different rules. Feel free to go there and try and change them, but don't whine if the incumbents decide to execute you for your trouble.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  230. Others end up on jail? by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1
    They only end up in jail if they violate his rights.

    Just as the people have the right to speak their opinions, the president is still one of the people and also enjoys this right.

    To stand on
    • your
      • soapbox and shout that you dissagree is fine. And many always do OUTSIDE every event he attends.


      • However idiots who do not respect that he shares the same rights try to enter an event uninvited, shout to drown him out, and not leave when asked are violating his rights.

        But we are still really tolerant of these people and let go within a few hours.
    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
  231. Blocked sites. by bigredlemon · · Score: 0

    If you like browsing around the web for news, you are going to be sadly dissapointed. When I was there, it felt like half of the sites linked by fark or slashdot were blocked.

  232. When in China by easter1916 · · Score: 1

    You are subject to Chinese law (unless you have diplomatic immunity). Show a little respect and common sense, and obey the prevailing laws.

    That you're American makes little difference -- in China, you're subject to Chinese law.

  233. Re:Obvious Point: Torture of Rebiya Kadeer by Agarwaen+The+Tired · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do quite the opposite of a Boycott. Right now the Chinese is caught in a catch-22. They want to maintain their totalirian control over society yet desire more then anything the Almighty Dollar. However, our economy REQUIRES financial freedom. You think those that become millionaires from paupers in China won't demand more and more control over the government? It's Happening but it's happening slowly. I'm personally cautiously optimistic about China. Yet, I woouldn't consider moving anytime soon.

  234. I think it's a matter of choosing. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    China, OR freedom of information. I'm sorry :(

  235. know you cannot access, by melted · · Score: 1

    Sex, drugs and rock and roll. They shoot people for using drugs, and sex can be dangerous as well if it results in pregnancy.

  236. Legality of Encryption by Starji · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I notice a lot of people are saying to forward all traffic through an ssh tunnel. That's all well and good, and would probably conceal whatever you're doing on the net, but is it legal? I know in some other countries encryption is considered illegal; does anyone know what the legal status of encryption in China is?

  237. Try & blend into the culture by chiph · · Score: 1

    I recommend you buy some chinese-made clothing when you get there, to help you blend-in with the local populace. They will instantly overlook your blond hair and 6-foot height, and think you're a long-lost cousin, and invite you to marry their daughter.

    On a serious note, it's their country, and they're their laws. Obey them or bad things happen, just like anywhere else in the world. You have some limited immunity because you're a westerner, but that only goes so far, so don't push your luck.

    A better question to ask would have been: "Does China have any laws or customs that a westerner would inadvertently run afoul of?"

    A good example would be one from Turkey: You do not stomp on a rolling coin to prevent it from getting away. You see, it has Mustafa Kemal Ataturk's image on it (founder of modern Turkey), and the law forbids defacing his image ... and you just put the sole of your foot on his face (showing the sole of your shoe to someone is a grave insult in Islamic countries).

    Chip H.

  238. Could it be that you had no problems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because your family WAS the law and could flaunt it as they saw fit?

  239. How to Get Slashdot Banned in China... by theycallmerenda · · Score: 1

    I think this topic would serve that purpose quite well...

  240. don't mourn Zhao Ziyang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or expect to get the beat down if you do. funny all the people talking about china is not "some sort of omni-present superpower". clip from cnn:

    They were among some 60 people who pinned white paper flowers to their clothes, a traditional Chinese symbol of mourning, said a bystander who took pictures of the beatings and posted them on overseas websites.

    "A man from Henan province was beaten badly. His left eyeball looked like it was beaten out of its socket and he had a one inch cut to his right eye," said the man who requested anonymity.

    "An elderly woman from Shandong province was beaten to a point where she couldn't move and a man from Hunan province was also beaten," he said.

    Police shouted at the petitioners that Zhao, who spent nearly 16 years under house arrest until his death last week, was a "political criminal," the witness said.

    http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/200 50 127/wl_afp/chinatiananmenpoliticspetitioners_05012 7114011

  241. Breaking the firewall by Jason_D_Berg · · Score: 1

    It's been many many years since I've been to China. Last time I was there was 1992 and the internet was an unknown thing. But I do have an idea or two. There's pesky filtering software at my college that makes it a pain in the butt to have "freedom." So I set up a webserver off campus and put a proxy on it. If a normal proxy server doesn't work, you can try using a cgi proxy script and access it using https. A cheap solution is spending $100/year on a virtual server. That works for me, but maybe a country of 1 billion people is a bit more sophisticated than a university of 5000 people.

  242. Re:Obvious Point: Torture of Rebiya Kadeer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You think those that become millionaires from paupers in China won't demand more and more control over the government?

    No. They will not demand "more and more control over the government". The best that China will achieve is Singapore's level: brutal government control with limited freedoms.

    Nonetheless, people like Rebiya Kadeer need help now. They cannot wait until a-moral scum like the Chinese become rich. Rebiya has already been in prison for 4.5 years. She needs to be released immediately.

    Last time I checked, virtually no Chinese attended my local chapter meeting of Amnesty International. That absence says a lot.

    If we boycott China, we must also boycott Taiwan. God damn the Taiwanese for investing $100 billion into more than 50,000 businesses in mainland China.

  243. Ah yes, Japan... by B4RSK · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ah yes, Japan... A bastion of human rights and equality.

    Technically Japan is a free democracy. But human rights? Equality? They are given lip service at best.

    Don't believe me? Ask the two Kurdish Turks just deported even though the UN had declared them refugees.

    Or perhaps the nurse who was denied a promotion because she does not have Japanese citizenship. She was BORN in Japan! She *only* speaks Japanese! Her mother was Japanese, her father Korean, and this is the source of her problem. At the time she was born having a Japanese mother did *not* get you Japanese citizenship. (Having a Japanese father would have though.) So her passport says "Korea", and thus she is denied a promotion. The kicker? This decision was just *upheld* by the Japanese Supreme Court!

    Yep, Japan... A bastion of human rights and equality.

    --
    Some people are like slinkies--basically useless but they bring a smile to your face when pushed down the stairs.
    1. Re:Ah yes, Japan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't believe me? Ask the two Kurdish Turks just deported even though the UN had declared them refugees.

      Man, that sucks. That's much worse than the USA holding hundreds of prisoners in a concentration camp in Cuba, without trial, charge, or even being told what it is they're accused of. I'm so glad I live in a bastion of human rights and equality, and not a nasty undemocratic place like Japan.

      Oh, wait.

    2. Re:Ah yes, Japan... by B4RSK · · Score: 1

      Man, that sucks. That's much worse than the USA holding hundreds of prisoners in a concentration camp in Cuba, without trial, charge, or even being told what it is they're accused of. I'm so glad I live in a bastion of human rights and equality, and not a nasty undemocratic place like Japan.

      Oh, wait.


      Japan would do *exactly* the same thing if they could get away with it like the US does.

      If Japan thought they could get away with it they'd invade North Korea in a second...

      --
      Some people are like slinkies--basically useless but they bring a smile to your face when pushed down the stairs.
  244. Kill Your Self... by stonewolf · · Score: 1

    And put the world out of your misery.

    I've never said anything like that on Slashdot before... But, the simple truth is that anyone who believes what you just said is my enemy and the enemy of every human that lives now or ever will live.

    Stonewolf

    1. Re:Kill Your Self... by utlemming · · Score: 1

      You either misunderstood what I said, or your a moron. Take your own advice.

      --
      The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
  245. SSH + Putty = SOCKS Proxy by petree · · Score: 1

    I had a simple solution to all the filtering/monitoring that went on there. I have a colocated server (replace with a linux box on a cable modem if necessary) which I SSH'd to and tunnelled. Although you could port forward anything you wanted, if you run windows you can just use PuTTY. It has a nice feature they call "dynamic" port forwarding. It just sets up a local socks proxy which tunnels through the SSH session. Just set your applications to use it as a proxy...I could use IE, Kazaa, etc. I could get at anything I wanted, and they couldn't snoop.

  246. Two Words by Fussen · · Score: 1

    Remote Desktop.

  247. Where in china? by strider_starslayer · · Score: 1

    Where in China are you moving; because if your moving to hong-kong, it's not going to be very different then the most amazingly crowded part of lets say new york, save;

    1- it will be more crowded

    2- Everyone will speak chinese first, english second

    3-The average height will be 5'6"

    4-When you board the subway, a man or woman with a large 'gladiator' style prodd will force you into the train during rush hour traffic.


    Outside of hong-kong the firewall might be more of an issue; but I woulden't circumvent it if I were you, as other's have pointed out; if you have a fundamental problem with the rights affoarded to you by a country you plan to move to; perhaps you should reconsider the move?

    --
    -Millions of Monkeys, Millions of typewriters, 6 hours of sorting through faeces encrusted pages to find: This post
  248. That wouldn't pertain to Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He says nothing about the freedom to speak or offer others his opinions or views. Or freedom to express parody. He says nothing about freedom to practice a religion of his choice

    This is a technology oriented website. It would be on topic for him to ask what kind of technical issues he'd run into over there, but it would be OFF TOPIC if he asked a question about practicing religion or expressing parody over there.

    Mod parent DOWN.

  249. WATCH THE TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and you might see people shouting jeers at President Bush, asking how many children he murdered that day.

    Clinton got his fair share of "babykiller" rhetoric from the pro-life crowd.

    Nixon was FORCED TO RESIGN due to Watergate. When was the last time a communist dictator was forced to resign, in anything other than a bloody coup?

  250. MOD PARENT DOWN. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -5, stupid. (The "mod parent up" should go in the TITLE, D'OH!!!)

  251. Triangle Boy by rly2000 · · Score: 1

    I've actually never tried it before, but I've read about a tool called triangle boy that utilizes third-party freedom-of-speech advocate servers that allow you to redirect url requests. I recall a company called safeweb develops this tool. I heard about this about three years ago though, so I'm not sure whether it still works.

  252. Re:Well .. smells funny by shubert1966 · · Score: 1

    I thought exactly the same thing. And I am machiavellian when it comes to defense. I read an article by a high ranking "Chinese Guy" (VP or something) denouncing the war in Iraq as folly. The writer has a great deal of polish, and this unseats the harmless intro. Is it cultural or random or clever? I think it is highly proable that it is culture, as most Americans have a not so rounded education. I live here - I can say that. The walk among us.

    --
    Stuff that matters.
  253. Easy as by SCVirus · · Score: 0

    proxy and or shell = firewall bypassed.

  254. Offtopic: You meant you're not your... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and one such flub I can forgive, but every single time indicates a misunderstanding of proper word usage.

    Your is possesive. You're is a contraction of you are. In every case you meant to write you're instead of your. A solution to this problem is to simply avoid use of contractions - use "you are" instead of you're in cases you intend to use you're.

    Maybe English is not your first language, maybe you are just having a bad day, but it is a shame to see a mistake like that detract from a well thought out post.

  255. OT - Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. by DarthWiggle · · Score: 3, Funny

    Aw, that sucks... 3 minutes late, and you don't get the extra "Funny" point... c'mon Mods... boost a brother up... he's just as funny, just a little, uh, slow. :)

  256. Experiences by henni16 · · Score: 1

    Well..

    I have a friend who lives in Beijing (married to an American she met there, she is working as some sort of intern for a German company) since 2001 or 2002.
    They didn't have problems with the government and have good relations with their neighbours.

    Another couple travelled on their own through China for a month,also no problems (in theory, they had to report where they were staying that night, but never did or it was taken care of by the hotels).
    They were welcomed everywhere they went, although mostly because of curiosity as they went to some places were they were the only tourists and the first blonde people there ;-)

    Another friend and his-now-wife lived in China for about one or two years, no problems there (and he is a geek/CS student who wrote his final thesis there, surely used ssh a lot to log into the university network (and for sourceforge access)).
    And: they didn't live somewhere in a tourist area,they rented a flat via a Chinese estate agent, they took private language lessions, dance courses, she worked in a hospital (-> interested i skills..) there yaddayadda
    Both of them even appeared on TV (gameshow&some sort of propaganda news documentation "the foreigner visits our family");-)

    Mind you:
    I am well aware about the human rights violations in China, but I am also quite sure that you can lead a normal life there without fear.
    Sure, you better don't start demos there or hand out "fuck the system"-flyers, but..

  257. It all comes down to competition. by jwsd · · Score: 1

    Believe it or not freedom is just like any other natural resources. Its supply is limited. When there are 1.3 billion people who all want the same resource, you have to pay a much higher price for it.

  258. Re:A friend of mine is there now and has no proble by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    An ex-gf of mine is over there going to school, and I asked her this very question, and she said she hadn't noticed any difference. Now she's not really nerdy or anything, but we talk on AIM sometimes and I've tested it by saying anti-communist things and such, but no secret police have arrested her yet.

    Don't lose hope my friend. Persistence will pay off. Keep on saying those anti-communist things and you'll get her arrested yet!

  259. Damn straight! by sharkey · · Score: 1
    For the same reason why Europeans think we're a country of hicks driving around in a pickup with shotguns who elected a idiot to office

    I am NOT a hick, anyway.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  260. Sites you can('t) get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A couple of years ago, I couldn't get any of the world's news sites (BBC, CNN, PBS, NBC, etc.), but now you can. However, if one of those sites has an article that the PRC gov finds offensive (human rights, Taiwan, Tibet, Xinjiang), that article will come up empty. Also, good luck finding anything about the abovementioned on other sites. Hint: use Google's "Cached" option to get baned sites. Good luck. It's not as bad as you'd think.

    Matthew

    1. Re:Sites you can('t) get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's absolutely the opposite of the truth. Specific articles are not blocked (with the exception of the local version of Google News, which just doesn't list them), but the Google Cache is banned. BBC News was still inaccessible as of the last time I was there (July), but most other major English language news sources are available.

      To be honest, the Great Firewall is more of a nuisance than a threat. It's really only sites relating to FLG and Taiwan independence that they stop you from getting at - the only time you're likely to run into it is when you have to open a PDF file instead of using Google's 'view as HTML' option.

    2. Re:Sites you can('t) get by fluppy88 · · Score: 1

      I'm currently there. One thing to be aware of is different locations have different restrictions. Beijing and SHanghai will likely have the least restrictions, and hotels will probably have less restrictions than other ISPs. ISPs all seem to block slightly different material.

      BBC News is still inaccessible.
      Google News is inaccessible 95% of the time.
      Small - Medium US newspapers are quite often blocked.

      This past few days I couldn't access NYtimes or slashdot (maybe because of the dead ex-leader). China will cut access of during sensitive times like this. Yahoo news never seems to be affected though, so you could always get the AP stories.

      But on the plus side, if you can read Chinese there are plenty of wonderful bittorent sites that have not been shut down. after the major BT closures I switched to Chinese sites and am still able to find everything I want. My time-shifted TV programs now have Chinese subtitles as an added bonus!!

    3. Re:Sites you can('t) get by Desiderata · · Score: 1

      I know google is banned, but according to a New Scienctist article, elgoog, the "backwards" google mirror, is not. I'm pretty sure you can access the caches through that, but the site is slow. And I don't think it can handle all of China trying to access it, though it's supposed to be quite popular.
      Death to censorship.

  261. Don't go! by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1

    Don't go to China unless you can do without your precious freedoms. Only thouroughly anti-social perverts need them.

  262. MOD PARENT UP! by skink1100 · · Score: 1

    Well said.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP! by beermonster1984 · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one annoyed by this "MOD PARENT UP!" shit? Probably.

  263. The UGLY American by Old.UNIX.Nut · · Score: 1
    One thing OFTEN forgotten by many citizens of the United States when travelling and/or living outside the country is that your Constitutional rights do NOT follow you outside the country.

    Also keep in mind that when a USA citizen breaks the rules in many countries it is often treated as SPYING, which can make put you in the position of being a pawn in some political game you're completely unaware of. The host country can decide to put on a "show trial" and/or jail you to try and trade you for one of their spies sitting in one of our jails.

    There are allot of battles being fought around the World by and against the USA that our citizens are completely unaware of. Example: we have troops in over 100 countries around the World.

    Famous last words for many USA citizens when caught doing something wrong on foreign soil are "you can't do this to me I'm an American". Allot of these people are rotting in prisons that make ours look like 5 star hotels.

    Do yourself a favor and stay in the USA unless you plan to play by the host country's rules 100%, and to keep your mouth shut about any of those rules you think are wrong.

    1. Re:The UGLY American by DrVomact · · Score: 1
      Example: we have troops in over 100 countries around the World.
      Ummm...quick guess: Marine embassy guards. Am I right?
      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    2. Re:The UGLY American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Example: we have troops in over 100 countries around the World.

      Ummm...quick guess: Marine embassy guards. Am I right?


      Ummm no, actually you're wrong. A good chunk of those troops would likely be either special forces or liasons, however.
  264. Mail server & Google by dlbornke · · Score: 1

    Stayed in Shanghai for an internship until last October.
    Most annyoing thing were mail servers: Have a GMail account, which wasn't accessible most of the time. Same with Google-Groups: Sometimes they just don't work.
    This does not happen the whole time though: Most of the time they don't work ... but sometimes they do!
    Same with my private mail server in Germany.

    Didn't have problems with news sites though.

    As well: Finding an Internet-Cafe is really, really hard .... didn't see one in Shanghai. Found one in Beijing at a railway station --> take a laptop and get DSL (it's cheap).

  265. you will be a guest, so think like one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dont expect to go to someone else's home and expect to be treated like you are in your own

    of course man in white house thinks otherwise doesnt he. he says, if they dont embrace our rules, make them embrace our rules. fire up the aircraft carriers!

  266. When in Rome, do like the Romans by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    "When in Rome, do like the Romans"

    Not that it's legal, but a VPN is about your only foolproof way of doing so.

    The other option is just live with it.

    Or...

    go with offline methods:

    Have a buddy in the US send you a CD-R of pr0n every month. Or video about how to make a car bomb... or whatever else gets you off.

    There not going through your mail.

    Other than that, I'd say respect the law. If you don't like their laws, don't visit them.

    "When in Rome, do like the Romans"

  267. Iraq by Dire+Bonobo · · Score: 2, Insightful
    > You can shove it down people's throats, because the majority of them want it.

    Witness our current shining success in Iraq.


    There are very few things you can shove down a person's throat without making them angry. You might gratefully accept chocolate if I offered it to you, but I bet you'd struggle like mad if I tried to shove it down your throat.

    The analogy goes farther than you expect.

    1. Re:Iraq by Hannes+Eriksson · · Score: 1

      You have no idea how right you are!
      Try swallowing while someone is pouring a molten chocolate bar into your mouth. Struggle is the word!

      --
      Geek rants since like... 2000 or something.
    2. Re:Iraq by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      Iraq has the problem that it was ruled by a minority, who is now very aware that democratic elections would not favor them. If there weren't Sunnis blowing crap up and outside powers interested in making sure the USA doesn't succeed, I suspect that the vast majority of people in Iraq would not have a problem with free elections.

      This is not an endorsement of the Iraq war, however. Merely offering a counter viewpoint.

    3. Re:Iraq by kevcol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Witness our current shining success in Iraq.

      The problems in Iraq have more to do with lack of security than people wanting to express their minds freely. Had the US done a better job in implementing security post-invasion, I'd wager the problems we see now would have been greatly reduced. You can find any number of 'man in the street' articles with Iraqis basically saying 'Thanks for getting rid of the tyrant, but why do I have to deal with carjackers everyday now?' I'd guess a majority were more than ready to be free of Saddam, but they were not happy that it was traded for anarchy.

    4. Re:Iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that the vast majority of people in Iraq would not have a problem with free elections.

      Yes. But the government they would elect would be an Islamic government that would enact Sharia law. Which is a system that violates many people's human rights (particularly those of women and non-Muslims).

      So we would give them freedom, and they would use that freedom to choose not to be free. Funny old world, isn't it?

    5. Re:Iraq by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      I cannot argue with your logic. It would however at least be a popular mandate, and not a minority mandate, for what that's worth.

    6. Re:Iraq by cheezit · · Score: 1

      Any "non-free" government that has been in place for a significant amount of time creates a class of people who are dependent on it (military, bureaucracy) and therefore interested in keeping it around. Any forcible removal of such a government will be opposed by that class of people. And often those people have a distinct ethnic or religious identity. Iraq is far from alone in this.

      The problem with dystopias like 1984 is that they don't capture how well tyranny, ethnic castes and tribalism work together.

      --
      Premature optimization is the root of all evil
    7. Re:Iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahahaahaha, good one :)

    8. Re:Iraq by quanticle · · Score: 0

      outside powers interested in making sure the USA doesn't succeed,

      I've been hearing this over and over from the Administration and am just getting sick and tired of it...

      Who are these outside powers? Why don't we name them if we know who they are? If we don't know (or at least suspect) who they are, then how are we sure that outside powers are involved in the first place?

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    9. Re:Iraq by shroompicker · · Score: 1

      > Witness our current shining success in Iraq.

      Agreed.

      The first ten pages of Machiavelli's "The Prince" cites the US's plan for Iraq as a Bad Idea[tm], to the letter, almost 500 years before the war. More precisely, they are a remote nation that is too different than our own, and to change such a thing into a colony like our own is the most expensive thing possible. Machiavelli suggests just setting up a couple of tight bases, and letting the people do whatever.

      The Chinese, however, are largely educated, and are more worldly knowledgable than the average American, while the Iraqis are not. They know what Democracy is, so if the world got together and booted the Communists, the people would accept a new Republic. Japanese and Germans after WWII were also largely educated, so a transition from what they had to a Republic was relatively easy. The average Iraqi just sees us as another thug, just like the ones they have had generations past.

    10. Re:Iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Chinese, however, are largely educated, and are more worldly knowledgable than the average American, while the Iraqis are not.


      Haven't been to China, have you? The Chinese you meet in the EU and US may be more "worldly knowledgable" but the average Chinese peasant (i.e. the majority of the Chinese citizenry) is not.
    11. Re:Iraq by lahvak · · Score: 1

      What exactly do you propose we should have done? Are you sure the alternative you are talking about isn't Iraqis on the street saying (or whispering) "thanks for getting rid of the tyrant, but why did you have to become another tyrant?" How would you implement security while still maintaining freedom?

      --
      AccountKiller
    12. Re:Iraq by kevcol · · Score: 1

      What I said should stand up an on it's own. I think a great many Iraqis were grateful for toppling the dictatorship, but let down that the security needs were mishandled. Only now do you hear the top of the command chain (read: administration) admit they lowballed an insurgency. And there were plenty of military leaders who thought Rumsfeld's minimal force was going to backfire. Especially former Army Chief of Staff Gen. Shinseki. Also, Powell's 'overwhelming force' doctrine was shitcanned. We could sure use overwhelming force now when plenty of places are no-mans-land.

      I will say that having gone in, I believe it was a mistake to send what was left of the Iraqi army packing and I thought that the minute it was announced by Bremer. It would have been better off and cheaper in the long run to pay a force $250 per man per month to drill then to take his last shreds of dignity away, which in this case, mostly meant earning a paycheck for his family and staying off his ass while industrial productivity was uncertain (i.e., unemployment is very high of course). Meanwhile those left with a uniform could have been the beginnings of the new national army, rather than conjuring one up from scratch. We'll never know how many of the domestic insurgents (as opposed to transnational agent provocateurs) were in that group that lost a job in one fell swoop. I dare say quite a few (and I am not one who would make the mistake of saying the whole insurgency is home grown).

      But who am I to know for sure? I'm just some guy posting to /.

    13. Re:Iraq by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      I think no amount of "implementing security post-invasion" could have solved the problem. I think the only solution that could have worked is giving the Iraqi themselves the tools to oust Saddam.
      Essentialy what the USA has done now is telling the Iraqi people as a whole that they are incompetent and need to be patronized. Essentially the USA destroyed their selfesteem, and handles the Iraqi like children. This makes people angry and uncooperative.

      Imagine brittish commando's raiding Guantanamo Bay and freeing all imprisoned there, returning them to the UK and giving them a fair and public trial there. How would you feel?
      You might think that keeping those prisoners there is wrong, but I think you would be ENRAGED if the the UK would "help" you solve the situation. Now imagine millions of Iraqi with that feeling. I think you will find very few Iraqi that feel the USA "helped" them, if they would have supported the 1991 Shiit revolt, things would have been very different.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    14. Re:Iraq by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      Iraq's enemies, for example Iran. Also, Al Qaeda has a lot to lose if either The USA liberates a muslim country, or if the USA gets a foothold in the middle east. Sunni fighters from other countries have been captured in Iraq. There are a lot of people interested in the failure of "new" Iraq.

    15. Re:Iraq by kevcol · · Score: 1

      I think you will find very few Iraqi that feel the USA "helped" them

      Well, you can think whatever you want, but I think you are wrong since I have read enough interviews of Iraqis from independent news sources that say essentially that. Besides, ask the Kurdish Iraqis- and you'll note that the 'no-fly' zones essentially gave them a 'state within a state' long ago. Yep, the Shias were betrayed. It was a disgrace. No question. But there is plenty of material out there for you to find that show Iraqis were grateful for ousting Saddam.

      However, 2 years on, I do believe the gist of what you are saying is correct, as a window of opportunity post-invasion has closed and the "goodwill factor" ran out for most. Yes, there is a lot of bitterness now, and understandably so. I think the post invasion occupation was mishandled badly. But this is where we disagree- I think better security measures and more would have alleviated much of it.

      As far as giving them the tools, maybe, maybe not would have worked. I think Saddam learned a lot from how many Soviet dominated countries were destablized from basically an information revolution (secret importation of fax machines for one). The amount of control he had over the population through various mechanisms was a lot higher than most other totalitarian regimes.

  268. MOD PARENT UP by rinkjustice · · Score: 1

    Some good info from eformo. The comment deserves better than a score of one.

    Btw, is anyone else annoyed by the flippant tone of the question?

  269. If I was a Chinese agent by Corellon+Larethian · · Score: 1

    , wanting to figure out how people bypass the firewall, this is exactly what I'd post on /. I'd also be asking on Usenet and IRC channels.

  270. Re:R.E.S.P.E.C.T. My God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In all the years that I have been coming here (yeah, anonymously), this is by far the most intelligent discussion I have read. Thank you.

  271. Don't take your dog... by kleinishere · · Score: 0

    If you have a dog, I'd leave it for adoption. There are a lot of hungry people over there in China.

  272. Set up a tunnelling SSH proxy server by haaardvark · · Score: 1

    It shouldn't be too hard to set up your own tunnelling server at a home computer, or have a friend do it. It would actually be a very interesting project to develope some sort of P2P proxy server system, one that was so massively distributed it couldn't be shut down without shutting down the web entirely. What does the rest of /. think?

  273. Is this for real? by Halvard · · Score: 1

    "This brings me to my overall question: is the censorship that real, that hard to get around, and how do you do it? What methods and technologies are you aware of or use to circumvent the Great Firewall of China?"

    Is it? Sounds like: hi, I work for Cisco (don't they do the Great Firewall?) or the Chinese government. "Will you show me how it gets circumvented so I can (a) arrest people and (b) block those holes."

  274. "China's Orwellian Internet" by Panaphonix · · Score: 1

    According to this backgrounder, it seems like China lives up to the hype: http://www.heritage.org/Research/AsiaandthePacific /bg1806.cfm BTW, whatever happened to TriangleBoy? And how is it different from Tor or Peek a Booty or Anonymizer?

  275. Forced agreement fails by Dire+Bonobo · · Score: 1
    > the only thing that simply CAN NOT be stuffed down people's throat, is freedom

    I would slightly disagree; I would characterize "agreement" as a class of things that can almost never be successfully forced on a person.


    To see this, consider the thousands of examples Slashdot serves up for our enjoyment: flame wars.

    How often does insulting and berating someone elicit their agreement on the topic of discussion? Pretty damn rarely. How often does polite and inoffensive language cause a person to say "good point" or give some other indication of agreement? Less often than it should, but still vastly more often than flaming.

    Consider how much less likely you'd be to agree---and not just to placate him---with someone flaming you if he gunned down your child halfway through his flame. How positively do you think you'd receive his arguments then?


    You can't use force to make someone to adopt your beliefs and values; the most you're likely to accomplish is the opposite. Sadly, those who realize this are rarely those who try it.

  276. You're just begging to be deported ... by JoeGee · · Score: 1

    "How can I circumvent the laws of the country where I'll be living?" If you do, and if you're caught (and you're likely to be -- surveillance is widespread) you will pay a penalty. The Peoples' Republic does as it will, and impassioned pleas from your embassy might keep you from hard labor in the Chinese version of a gulag, but they probably wouldn't keep you from a period of re-education inside a Chinese jail cell before you're kicked out of the country as a persona non grata.

    On the other hand, if you don't feel you are entitled to special privileges, and obey the same laws as the locals you'll probably get along swimmingly.

    I won't make any guesses in regards to your nationality, but when you're traveling abroad, you do *not* take the laws of your country with you. For your information the laws of the country you are visiting supercede those of your country of citizenship. If you go on a spree, there's nothing to keep you from being tried twice for your crimes, once in the Peoples' Republic and again in your home country.

    My advice, if you're already planning on breaking the law, don't go.

    -Joe G.

    --

    Get off my virtual lawn, you damned virtual kids!
  277. MOD PARENT DOWN PLEASE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Democracy is a basic right for all human beings? Human rights are a basic right?

    Why? Because the UN said so? If we actually hold these rights sacred we should start actually enforcing them here, in our country, before we go out and try to tell others what to do, or force them to do things.

    Human rights are violated in prisons and by our government every day, we are condemned by Amnesty international, just as China is condemned, we were founded by violating the natural rights of the native peoples. Democracy? We don't have democracy for the people in Wash DC... we don't have democracy in general, we are governed by tyrants, who care for the corporations, not the people.

    Freedom? Tell a man in jail for planting a seed that he is free, tell that to those who wish to merely go from one place to another and are harassed or stopped at roadblocks and sometimes beaten by the police.

    Equality? A rich man is more equal than any poor man, a white man is more equal than a black woman, the disparity between salaries for the genders is far from equal...

    How long have we been this great and free nation? How long has it been since black and white men were gunned down, lynched, burned, for trying to be free?

    We are a great and free nation, maybe more so than all others, but you seem to be deluded into thinking that we have found the one true answer, and that we can tell everyone else to fuck off and get with the program.

    China has been around for thousands of years... I wonder if it is such an evil thing for a nation to be held together at the expense of a few rights that we in this nation have been propagandized into thinking are as important as the air we breathe.

    Ultimately China lives, it survives, people will live, die, be governed, and be happy in China. Babies will be born and our race will live on. Certainly it would satisfy our moral indignation if they were more like us, but they are not like us... they live their own way for now, a tree who's roots are confined can still branch out into the sky like any other tree.

  278. Don't do drugs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good luck in your endeavour. Despite what some of the idiots here on Slashdot are ranting about, China is much more free and open then the media here has led you to believe. You would be fine as long as you don't do something serious such as injuring/killing another person, at which point you will probably be deported.

    HOWEVER, China cracks down on illegal drugs really hard. Chinese citizen who traffic drugs get executed when caught. I doubt they do the samething to foreigners but you can expect hard jail time. So just don't do it!

  279. Children by wpiman · · Score: 0

    As long as you don't want more than one child- go for it......

  280. SSH by BriniestMark · · Score: 0
    Yeah, because an encrypted connection on port 22 is totally going to fool them.

    Seriously, senõr retardo, nothing's going to make your network activity stand out more than encrypting it. Do you really think that if the Chinese government is intent on securing internet access, that they'll just ignore non-HTTP traffic? What this situation call for is steganography .

    --
    You see that brine there? That's my brine.
  281. False by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 1

    Today. Blame the boogieman media if you want. I can't imagine being beaten or imprisoned for visiting the Clinton Library here in America. The PARTY decides who you may or may not revere. Beating is an effective method of "reeducation".

    1. Re:False by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      The "Clinton Library" is not any sort of threat the the status quo. In the scheme of things, he's pretty much like Bush--except he's not a crook, stupid, and he actually cares about others.

      Could you have a Pro-Bin Laden charity without being sent to a camp?

      What if I thought Bin Laden was right... wouldn't I then become a terrorist? Because that's how the Patriot Act defines it. I don't have to do anything like build a bomb, I only have to support those who want to overthrow the government.

      And how nervous am I to say even this?

      >> In the future, an outlaw will be someon who doesn't dring the coolaide.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    2. Re:False by kibler · · Score: 1

      he actually cares about others.

      Yeah, Clinton cared enough to buy knee pads for his interns.

      Because that's how the Patriot Act defines it. I don't have to do anything like build a bomb, I only have to support those who want to overthrow the government.

      Let me get this straight - you would have a problem with locking up someone who finances the brutal murder of thousands of innocent men, women, and children? Maybe your pro-Bin Laden charity could purchase airline tickets for Al Qaeda's representatives.

      Forever burned in my mind is the image of men and women jumping from the World Trade Center so that they wouldn't burn to death. Anyone who supports the cowardly pieces of crap behind 9/11 should get to take a nice vacation at Gitmo.

  282. as another person who's originally from china... by Avial · · Score: 1

    I have to say that every time I've been back to China, I've encountered absolutely nothing in terms of enforcement of laws regarding security, information, freedom, religion, porn, blah blah blah. The real problem is the latency of the connection from China to the US. It is absolutely horrible.

    I was recently in Shanghai visiting family and took a lot of photos and would upload them to Flickr through the Flickr Uploader software. Typically, I would have to try 3 or 4 times to get them uploaded because the connection would keep timing out. Same thing for accessing my bank account, my credit card, and so on. Incredibly slow because of the latency even though I was on a 1.5Mbps/256Kbps DSL line. I also had no trouble getting to major US newspapers like the NYTimes and CNN, and no trouble getting to porn sites in the US. Mind you, this is all on a connection provided by, and available only through China Telecom, a corporation that is state-owned and operated (They own and operate all phone communications in China I believe).

    So for those people who are moving to US and are deathly afraid of loss of such freedoms, don't be, as others have said, as long as you're not trying to raise a ruckus, no one's gonna give a damn. Though being guarded about your opinions in front of people in high positions of power maybe a worthwhile tactic. I would guarantee you, in most places, people will eye your skin color and then think about how to make money off of you first before they worry about if you're gonna try to spread the evils of western-style thinking. What you should be most concerned about is the difference in manner and attitudes of Chinese people.

    --
    help a poor college grad get a free Mac Mini
  283. Just set the Evil bit in all your packets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Following RFC 3514. That way, all your traffic will look like government traffic.

    1. Re:Just set the Evil bit in all your packets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Firewalls, packet filters, intrusion detection systems, and the like
      often have difficulty distinguishing between packets that have
      malicious intent and those that are merely unusual. We define a
      security flag in the IPv4 header as a means of distinguishing the two
      cases.

      Holy shit, dude! That's hilarious.

      As my company commander in boot-camp said, "DROP! DROP!! DROP YOU MUTHERFUCKERS AND BEGIN!!"
  284. Freedom in a restricted area by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Assuming you're on a Linux machine, do PPP over SSH. Plenty of people will say it's slow, but I've been using it very successfully for several months on high speed connections (> 2Mb/s). The only time I've had problems is when the connection goes down, but hey, that's the problem. :)

    I found this script somewhere on the 'net, and made adjustments. It's not perfect, but it works for me, so I have no grand plans for making more changes.

    You'll need to have SSH keys set up between where you are, and a server on a 'friendly' network. This will route *ALL* of your traffic, over SSH, through the remote host. Nothing you do will be seen. It'll all be encrypted SSH traffic. I use a different port for SSH, so it's not even recognized as SSH traffic. For all they know, it could be music streaming or something. :)

    --- begin rc.firewall (for the server)
    #!/bin/tcsh
    # not all of this is necessary. Play with it a bit.
    #!/bin/tcsh

    # A simple rc.firewall to start NAT.
    echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
    iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT
    iptables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
    iptables -P INPUT ACCEPT
    iptables -F INPUT
    iptables -F OUTPUT
    iptables -F FORWARD
    iptables -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
    iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o ppp+ -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
    iptables -A FORWARD -i ppp+ -o eth0 -j ACCEPT
    iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE

    --- end rc.firewall

    --- begin ppptunnel.pl
    #!/usr/bin/perl

    #
    # there should be no /etc/ppp/options on either the server or the client.
    #

    $localip="1.2.3.4"; # first ip on net
    $localmask="255.255.255.0"; # 16 ips
    $remoteip="1.2.3.5"; # other end of link
    $ssh="/usr/bin/ssh";
    $pppd="/usr/sbin/pppd" ;
    $sshuser="my_vpn_user"; # The remote user, who has SSH keys set up.
    $sshhost="1.2.3.4";

    foreach $maj ("p".."s") { # adjust this to the ptys you have
    foreach $min ("0".."9", "a".."f") {
    print "Trying $maj$min\n";
    &tryopen("$maj$min");
    }
    }
    die "Couldn't alloc pty\n";

    sub tryopen
    {
    local($d)=@_;

    if (open(PTY, "+>/dev/pty$d")) {
    print "Opened /dev/pty$d\n";
    $pid=fork;
    defined($pid) || die "can't fork";

    if ($pid) { #parent
    print "Parent...\n";
    open(STDIN, "<&PTY") || die "reopen stdin";
    open(STDOUT, ">&PTY") || die "reopen stout";
    close PTY;
    print STDERR "running on tty$d; ssh=$$, pppd=$pid\n";
    #system $ssh, "-vt", "-l$sshuser", "vpn", "sudo /sbin/route delete $localip";
    #-f -x -t
    $c = "$ssh -tx -l$sshuser $sshhost \"sudo /usr/sbin/pppd passive\"";
    print STDERR "Executing $c\n";
    exec "$c";
    die "exec $ssh: $!";

    } else { #child
    print "Child...\n";
    close PTY;
    sleep 5;
    print "Modifying routes\n";
    $old_def_route = `route -n | grep ^0.0.0.0 | cut -c 17- | cut -f 1 -d ' '`;
    chop ($old_def_route);
    $c = "route add -host $sshhost gw $old_def_route";
    print "Route: $c\n";
    system("$c");
    $c = "route del default gw $old_def_route";
    print "Route: $c\n";
    system("$c");

    print "starting pppd\n";
    $c = "$pppd /dev/tty$d defaultroute local proxyarp ktune";
    # exec $pppd, "/dev/tty$d", "defaultroute", "local", "debug", \
    # "netmask", "$localmask", "$localip:$remoteip";
    exec "$c";
    die "exec $pppd: $!";
    }
    }
    }

    print "Switching default route back to it's original\n";
    $c = "route add default gw $old_def_route netmask 0.0.0.0 metric 1";
    system("$c");
    --- end ppptunnel.pl

    If the link comes up, you'll see a ppp0 device on your machine (not the server). Do some traceroutes to verify you

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  285. blocked sites by ceb0 · · Score: 1

    I lived for a year in china in 2003, the only sites I ever had a problem accessing were bbc news, and googles cache. Also, anonymizing proxy sites such as megaproxy are all blocked. Using any other proxy won't work either. Still had no problems with any american news sites, any pr0n or anything else. China's quite a cool place to live if you're a foreigner, but the authorities don't like you talking about sex, religion or politics, which is kind of difficult really. Still, I'd highly recommend going, it's a completely different lifestyle. And unless you're going to Beijing or Shanghai, you'll probably have to get used to being stared at.

  286. addendum by Apro+im · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's hard to defend morally, and it's hard to stomache, but forcing people out from the yoke of a tyrant doesn't work - the best you can do is convince them that they want to get out from under that yoke.

    1. Re:addendum by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about helping those that want to break the yoke but can't.

      --
      You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
  287. Actually knowing people who live in china.... by marcybots · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Dont listen to what half the the anti-communist conservatives and media say about China. Yes its true human rights are trampled when in the states interest...BUT and that was a big but for a reason, the Chinese have a totally different attitude about policing their citizens than American police. As a criminal justice instructor I am very interested in these difference.
    In china the situation is much different, their saying is "its only illegal if you get caught" Which has a deeper meaning than many understand...many times the police are not looking to arrest people for petty matters, they are more interested in social order...or as they refer to it "harmony". However this cultural view of harmony represents tome things we consider unpleasant. But the upshot is that unless the government is interested at that point in time in cracking down on something...it is usually just ignored...for example it is illegal to manufacture or distribute bootleg cds and dvds, but when my girlfriend and her family were in china right when you get off the bus...and the government doesnt care. Many people go to banned websites, download illegal things, hell half the banned games in china can be bought off a store shelf! The point is remember when those cybercafes got busted, that was a crackdown. Chinese policing usually let things go for a while then crackdown to show it is illegal...then let it go again...remember they have limited resources and are more interested in maintaining their fragile power structure than concerning themselves with if your watching porn...which you can totally get in china, easily..as well as hookers but both technically illegal.
    That wouldnt happen in america,
    In many ways american police are much more facist than chinese police, in that if you are breaking a rule they will arrest you. If it were illegal to sell pornography in america, no stores sell it..but it is illegal in china but still sold out in the open in many places..DWI check points are a perfect example...people who are over an arbirtrary legal limit but still in control of their vehicles get the same punishment as those who are swerving all over the road because they cant handle their liquor. This over emphasis on enforcing every rule is due a great deal to the colletion of fines, which police departments in America use to fund themselves...ever notice why they go after drug dealer so aggressivley but if you aparment gets burglarized they dont even dust for prints?

    1. Re:Actually knowing people who live in china.... by Corellon+Larethian · · Score: 0, Troll

      This is known as "social priorities". Honestly, your blurb doesn't transmit any notiable differences between the governments.

      What I got out of that is "don't get caught". And that's exactly the same thing as America. Don't get caught with the intern sucking your cock, while you order troops into Bosnia. Don't get caught sending CIA "black-ops" agents to ask Serbs to shoot down Ron Brown's plane over Bosnia. Don't get caught fucking a 9 year-old "barely legal/just-had-her-period-3-days-ago" cousin in Mesopotamia. Don't get caught smuggling weapons, through a tunnel, from Egypt into Palesine. Don't get caught eating cheese and sleeping with 100 different mistresses in Paris.

      Don't get caught filming pr0n in Los Angeles when you're fourteen.

      Or for that matter, don't get caught fucking wiping out filthy Palestinians when you're the Ottoman Turks and you're fucking fed up with raids into your lands.

      Dude. If you were trying to, like, outline some difference between the United States of America dn China, you utterly failed. Even the tank commander was reluctant to just fucking roll over that fucking rice-eating briefcase-wielding Chinaman son of a bitch. I fucking would have. Fucking teach that tree-hugger to defy me!

      You are going to have to discuss social stability and personal rights, to draw a difference between China and the US. Not individually and seperate; you are going to have to integrate social stability and personal rights. With integrals, you don't always get to factors out and cancel variables.

      Some variables interact with others.

    2. Re:Actually knowing people who live in china.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The point is remember when those cybercafes got busted, that was a crackdown."

      China needs to maintain its prison industry of slave labor too, just like the US. And just like the US, it needs a steady supply of non-violent slaves. It won't do to arrest actual criminals. So it's pot smokers in the states. Coffee drinking video game players in China. Things are tough all over.

  288. Mod Parent DOWN by jephthah · · Score: 1

    it is NOT "insightful" to say that "news sites are forbidden" in China.

    its just plain false.

    and stupid.

  289. It is hard for me to say what is wrong with UNIX.. by thomasa · · Score: 1
  290. my advice by xbmodder · · Score: 1, Informative

    well my advice is short and sweet. A little expensive though. Get your own dedicated server here in the good old USA. Install PPP tunneling on it. This is easy. Make sure it goes through an SSH tunnel. Set that up as a NAT server. Then mess with your routing tables a little. Once you do that you can connect to the internet through you American gateway. Cool, eh? The alternate route. Uses less bandwidth but you can only use it with Apps that have proxy compatibility. Get your good ol' 100% Americano servero running linux up. It has to have SSHD and Squid. Make a tunnel from localhost to squid on the remote server. Just use localhost as the proxy. AES-768 is the encryption i reccomend. The last route is get a computer here. VNC into it over an SSH tunnel. TightVNC has this nice-nifty feature built it. Wanna hear from you soon. Get that wiki up and running now!

  291. Mmmmmmmmm, Censorship! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chinese DNS servers do not respond with IPs of dynamically addressed websites (dyndns.org, and the like). However, while I was living in China, I found that I had no problem tunneling through a private proxy back here in the US.

  292. China's Gov't is ruthless by b3njam1nG · · Score: 1

    You will be fine in China and will be treated much better than any local would. The biggest form of censorship on the net is directed at groups the Gov't views as "anti China".

    They are still persecuting, torturing and killing innocent people. The most severely being Falun Gong practitioners who have been persecuted since 1999 for following the principles of Truth, Compassion and Tolerance.

    Sometimes pictures speak louder than words. Below are links to pictures of Falun Dafa practitioners that have been beaten, raped, shocked with electrical batons, etc.

    Warning: Most of the pictures are graphic

    http://photo.minghui.org/photo/images/persecution_ evidence/torture/images/hosp30jul01_4_big.jpg
    http://photo.minghui.org/photo/images/persecution_ evidence/torture/images/2002-7-23-11.jpg
    http://photo.minghui.org/photo/images/persecution_ evidence/more/images/wang_bin_torture_big.jpg
    http://photo.minghui.org/photo/images/persecution_ evidence/torture/images/11810_big.jpg
    http://photo.minghui.org/photo/images/persecution_ evidence/torture/images/chao_2_big.jpg
    http://photo.minghui.org/photo/images/persecution_ evidence/torture/images/torture3_big.jpg
    http://photo.minghui.org/photo/images/persecution_ evidence/torture/images/m2_big.jpg
    http://photo.minghui.org/photo/images/persecution_ evidence/torture/images/lixin_foot290401_3_big.jpg
    http://photo.minghui.org/photo/images/persecution_ evidence/torture/images/lixin_foot290401_3_big.jpg
    http://photo.minghui.org/photo/images/persecution_ evidence/torture/images/lixin_foot290401_2_big.jpg
    http://photo.minghui.org/photo/images/persecution_ evidence/torture/images/helene26nov01_2_big.jpg
    http://photo.minghui.org/photo/images/persecution_ evidence/torture/images/2003-1-2-songxu.jpg
    http://photo.minghui.org/photo/images/persecution_ evidence/evil_scene/images/2002-7-11-violent-polic e-2.jpg

    For more information on Falun Dafa I recommend: www.falundafa.org.

    For more information on the persecution, I recommend: www.faluninfo.net.

    For more information about the lawsuits filed, by Falun Dafa practitioners around the world, against the perpetrators of this persecution, I recommend:
    http://www.bjtj.org/
    http://www.grand trial.org/

    Th

    1. Re:China's Gov't is ruthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The toes look like frostbite. Dunno 'bout the rest.

      ogrish.org?

    2. Re:China's Gov't is ruthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of them look as though they were struck by lightning. And the picture of feet looked like frostbite. Are you sure you haven't been suckered?

    3. Re:China's Gov't is ruthless by b3njam1nG · · Score: 1

      I know they look terrible and are quite shocking. A few Falun Gong practitioners have ended up escaping the labour camps and made it to Australia. I've talked to more than half a dozen here in Sydney who all have told me stories of the horrible things they endured. The saddest fact is that this is still going on right now all over China! I've seen a young Chinese Lady's hair turn white over a period of a week after she first told us of what happened to her husband. He was tortured to death for going to the appeals office in Beijing to tell them that Falun Gong should not be persecuted. She was so scared just to tell the story..

    4. Re:China's Gov't is ruthless by b3njam1nG · · Score: 1

      The "Lightening" effect is from them being violently shocked by the standard issue Electric Batons. Reports have indicated that the police in the labour camps use these high voltage battons on sensitive areas such as the genitals, armpits, tounge, breasts, sole of the feet, ears, and eyes.

  293. ALL IT IS IS DNS!! by ToadMan8 · · Score: 1

    I was in China this summer; my i-net connections couldn't resolve www.muohio.edu to 134.53.7.10 but if you typed in 134.53.7.10 it would bring up the page. So I happened to remember our pair of DNS servers were 134.53.253.1 and .5 and just edited my tcp/ip settings - it works to get to every site, including www.ChinaIsABunchOfPinkoCommiesAndLookHowThatFucke dRussiaDemocracy IsSoMuchBetterChinaDie.com.

    --
    I haven't posted in so long, my sig is out of date.
    1. Re:ALL IT IS IS DNS!! by Roman_(ajvvs) · · Score: 1
      www.ChinaIsABunchOfPinkoCommiesAndLookHowThatFucke dRussiaDemocracyIsSoMuchBetterChinaDie.com

      doesn't resolve for me. Does that mean I'm in China?

      --
      click-clack, front and back. I'm not moving this car otherwise.
  294. Many (MANY) Duplicates on that List by ReadParse · · Score: 1

    That list is woefully misleading. Yeah, the censorship in China is amazing and its wrong, but the sheer length of that list (25,064 URLs when I checked) tells you something about Chinese censorship. But the list is padded with many duplications.

    I quickly came up with 7,375 unique URLs, not counting things like variations in case.

    Google along is duplicated over 5,000 times :) Playboy variations are duplicated over 700 times. Amnesty International, over 200 times. CNN almost 500. The list goes on and on, literally :)

    RP

  295. Knitpicking... by Pii · · Score: 3, Informative
    If weaponized, these would be biological weapons, not chemical weapons.

    Chemical weapons include such nasties as Mustard Gas, VX, and other blood and nerve agents.

    Also, I doubt very seriously that Iraq approached us, and said "Hey, we'd like to make some biological weapons so we can really stick it to the Iranians, with whom we are at war. Waddya say?"

    The CDC wouldn't have been involved if the request wasn't made under the guise of medical research. If we hadn't provided it, they could have gotten it from any number of other sources.

    I'm not saying we never sold them chemical weapons, or the makings thereof... Just that these aren't them.

    Not everything is as sinister as you think it is.

    --
    For those that would die defending it, Freedom
    has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
    1. Re:Knitpicking... by quanticle · · Score: 0

      Also, I doubt very seriously that Iraq approached us, and said "Hey, we'd like to make some biological weapons so we can really stick it to the Iranians, with whom we are at war. Waddya say?"

      Actually, that's almost exactly what happened...

      Iraq approached the US about acquiring weapons, conventional, biological, and chemical so that it could finish off Iran, whom we were also opposed to (due to the whole Islamic revolution deal). The US agreed, and we sent Donald Rumsfeld over to consumate the deal.

      More information

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    2. Re:Knitpicking... by LoveTruthBeauty · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I know its natural to think that your country reflects you and therefor generally behaves well, but unfortunately that is not the case, especially in the USA.

      It is ironic that the lead article is about censorship in China. Chinese censorship is clumsy and ineffectual compared to the advanced spin and propaganda in the USA. This is why most US citizens think America is a positive force in the world, and are completely baffled when the rest of the world resents and distrusts them. Of course, nobody likes to be told they've been accepting lies. Most US citizens will be feeling very defensive and will vehemently deny that they could be influenced by propaganda. Everyone thinks its something that can only happen to someone else. That is one of the reasons it is so cuccessful.

      Outside the USA, it is well known that the USA supplied Iraq with biological and chemical weapons. Its not even controversial. Its just one in a long list of disgusting behaviours the USA has done and is doing. It was based on the 'my enemy's enemy is my friend' logic. Hussein was supposed to use these weapons to win the war against Iran.

      Funnily enough, the reason the Bush government was so confident that they'd find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq is because they know he had them because they sold them to him!

      > The CDC wouldn't have been involved if the request wasn't > made under the guise of medical research.

      I'm not sure if that is your personal theory, or if that comes from some actual propaganda. Either way, it doesn't stand up to any scrutiny. Medical research on Anthrax? At the request of a known dictatorship, currently at war? Gimme a break!

      --
      Which nations do you trust to use nuclear weapons responsibly?
    3. Re:Knitpicking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Funnily enough, the reason the Bush government was so confident that they'd find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq is because they know he had them because they sold them to him!

      So why didn't they 'find' them? It would've seemed easy enough. Bush took a big black eye on not finding anything at all. He would have gained much by planting a story of a tiny WMD lab (in a truck even.)

      Yeah, I know, conspiracies within same. Thanks.

    4. Re:Knitpicking... by LoveTruthBeauty · · Score: 1
      Either they were too well hidden or more likely they were destroyed by Hussein to avoid the invasion. That the USA (and other countries too) sold bio-weapons to Iraq is not a conspiracy theory - its a documented fact.

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename= article&node=&contentId=A52241-2002Dec29&notFound= true

      Its not surprising that Hussein didn't go out of his way to notify his enemies that he was a toothless tiger.

      What is surprising is that so many US citizens refuse to accept that their government does not always act ethically.

      --
      Which nations do you trust to use nuclear weapons responsibly?
    5. Re:Knitpicking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is not all bio-weapon research done under the guise of "medical research"? :)

    6. Re:Knitpicking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your argument is that there were wmd they were just destroyed? I don't know if I've ever heard that argument from someone who is anti-USA before.

      I don't really care if my country acts ethically or not. I care that my country acts on my behalf and on the behalf of the rest of the citizens. That is the only true responsibility of any country. Like it or not (which I don't) a majority of the elected representatives of this country decided to go to war.

      Personally I don't think we should have gone to war. I think we should pull out of all areas outside of our borders and worry about ourselves, but then of course the rest of the world would continue whining because now we weren't doing exactly what everyone else wants, and they would have no scapegoat for all of the problems in the world.

      Try turning that propaganda lens on some of the other countries in the world and see what you get.

    7. Re:Knitpicking... by 17028 · · Score: 1

      Aren't anthrax and botulinum billed as chemical weapons? Reason being that a chemical weapon works through direct toxicity, while a biological weapon is an infection. Too tired to Google.

    8. Re:Knitpicking... by LoveTruthBeauty · · Score: 1
      I'm not anti USA. Its a great country of countless achievements and triumphs. Like all countries, its not all positive. It happens to be the sole superpower right now, so when it stuffs up, it has a bigger impact than when Tuvalu stuffs up.

      > I don't really care if my country acts ethically or not.
      > I care that my country acts on my behalf and on the behalf
      > of the rest of the citizens.

      Its that kind of attitude that leads to wars. Do you really want your government stealing and maiming and murdering on your behalf (non-US citizens, of course), simply to gain a material advantage for US citizens?

      Having great power also means having great responsibility. It would ultimately benefit the USA as much as anywhere else for the USA to endeavour to act ethically, both towards its own citizens and the citizens of the world. Leading by example is better than leading by force.

      It is a tragedy that the fine example of US freedom is being sullied by actions such as Guantanamo Bay, Iraq and the Patriot Act. The US used to be a beacon of hope and freedom - an example that less free citizens world wide hoped to change the governments to resemble. It is increasingly acting like an imperialist bully to be feared and loathed.

      > the rest of the world would continue whining because now
      > we weren't doing exactly what everyone else wants

      I'm not sure where you get your information about what the rest of the world wants from the USA, but I do think its time you checked your sources and perhaps broadened them a little.

      --
      Which nations do you trust to use nuclear weapons responsibly?
    9. Re:Knitpicking... by Alexei · · Score: 1

      Sorry for nitpicking, but that title's just begging for it: no k in 'nit.'

    10. Re:Knitpicking... by NCraig · · Score: 1
      Having great power also means having great responsibility.
      Yes, but to whom?

      At the end of the day, the American government is responsible to its citizens. America is the subject of countless attacks because segments of the world have come to believe that we are responsible to them.
      It is a tragedy that the fine example of US freedom is being sullied by actions such as Guantanamo Bay, Iraq and the Patriot Act. The US used to be a beacon of hope and freedom - an example that less free citizens world wide hoped to change the governments to resemble. It is increasingly acting like an imperialist bully to be feared and loathed.
      We have been fighting wars like the one we are currently engaged in since the Spanish-American War. When they benefit you, we are a beacon of hope and freedom. When they do not, we are imperialist bullies.

      Meanwhile, the rest of the world wonders why we are tired of hearing their opinions on every little detail of our national policies.
    11. Re:Knitpicking... by kir · · Score: 1

      Thanks for speaking for the rest of the world. Are you its spokesman?

      --
      3cx.org - A truly bad website.
    12. Re:Knitpicking... by kir · · Score: 1

      There you go again painting broad strokes. Why do you think "so many US citizens refuse to accept that their government does not always act ethically"?

      I'm guessing you've some anecdotal evidence.

      --
      3cx.org - A truly bad website.
    13. Re:Knitpicking... by LoveTruthBeauty · · Score: 1
      > Yes, but to whom?

      We all have a responsibility to respect everyone else's human rights. Governments and individuals. If you wont do it because its right, do it because ultimately you will be better off if you do so.

      Where would the world be if every person and every institution had an attitude of 'me first, screw you'?

      Ultimately, it is in your best interest to not create enemies, and to support and uplift those around you.

      It is through cooperation and mutual support that humans have made moved out of caves and created all the achievements we now enjoy. Uplifting yourself by stepping on others doesn't work for long.

      Do you really think the USA is attacked because segments of the world believe you are responsible for them, or are you just trolling? If its the former, I'd love to know where you get your information.

      --
      Which nations do you trust to use nuclear weapons responsibly?
    14. Re:Knitpicking... by jpop32 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thanks for speaking for the rest of the world. Are you its spokesman?

      Yup. We appointed him last week.

    15. Re:Knitpicking... by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      Also, I doubt very seriously that Iraq approached us, and said "Hey, we'd like to make some biological weapons so we can really stick it to the Iranians, with whom we are at war. Waddya say?"

      I'm willing to bet that's precisely how it happened.

      World leaders are just ordinary folks, like you and me. They do things the way we would do them, with little difference. They are not some all-encompassing higher power with knowledge and intellect that's completely incomprehensible to us. They're just everyday folks who make the same mistakes as we do. Nothing more, nothing less.

    16. Re:Knitpicking... by pyota · · Score: 1

      I don't really care if my country acts ethically or not. I care that my country acts on my behalf and on the behalf of the rest of the citizens.

      it's a pretty sad statement that you only care about people from your country. two words come to mind: insular and dehumanization.

  296. what site we can not acess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Pr0n, mp3z, and games aside, what are the things that those of you in the Celestial Kingdom know you cannot access

    www.georgewbush.com it nice know befor he invade and start killing chinee

  297. Re:That is historically incorrect thinking. by vertinox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    *DISCLAIMER* I am not a historian, but a few things bother me about this post since I tend to study this time frame.

    We could have dominated the world, and who would have opposed us?

    Quite a few people. I agree the America was most generous and possibly the most moral country that once ever existed (until maybe the 21st century), but...

    The peasantry of China?

    They opposed 2 million Japanese troops since 1927 with nothing but militias. The Chinese handed us our rears in Korean War

    The decimated demoralized Soviets?

    Stalin dictated the post war terms directly through Molotov to the Allies. The Allies agreed to every term! The Soviets had almost 10,000,000 troops in the field with more factories and tanks than us to boot and millions of readily available free slave labor (German Pow's, Ukranian Freedom Fighters, and Russian dissidents in gulags... not to mention the Soviet People themselves). The Red Army was inefficient, but it was far from being defeated. They would scoff at the poor quality of US tanks that the Americans sent them as aid and nick named them coffins compared to super IS-2 tanks that could knock out Tiger tanks with ease much less a thinly armored Sherman tank. He mostly lacked a Navy and Atomic bombs. Had he not died in 53, it was speculated he was gearing up for a war with the US.

    Once the Soviets had the bomb in 1947, America did not have that option to dominate the world even if they wanted to. That's only two years. Mind you that General MacArthur bemoaned on the state of the military by the Korean War.

    Great as America was, it's military might was not really as great then as it was and is since the 1970's as it was tested in the Vietnam war. Of course the prevailing thought at the time was that there was no need for a standing army since the US could defend itself with the Bomb.

    Not to say America has great freedoms, but neither was it a lone super power until 1991 when the Soviet Union collapsed.

    However China is slowly catching up...

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  298. It's not about Bush.... by flinxmeister · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These are the Americans who voted for Bush, who can't see the problems with the Patriot Act or the war on Iraq,

    Bush or Kerry or Clinton or Gore or whoever...it's not the nature of a candidate or party to erode freedoms. It's the nature of government to erode freedoms. It's been this way since the dawn of history.

    Whoever we elect may be great for a year or so...but give 'em time. This really isn't a partisan or politicial issue.

    IMHO, once we got addicted to the 'free' cash of entitlements, we pretty much ensured that people would be too distracted to care about freedom. Americans these days don't think about free-DOM as much as 'free' prescription medicine, 'free' retirement, 'free' education....etc. Don't believe me? Compare the upcoming brouhaha over social security to the debate over patriot act renewal. See which one people care about more.

    1. Re:It's not about Bush.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the nature of government to erode freedoms.


      I suppose that depends on whether citizens or corporations are in charge of a government.

      Ask yourself who's behind some of the recent freedom-erosions such as DMCA, Software patents, broadcast flag, etc. Did "the government" just decided to do these things out of the blue?

      Corporations love it when everything gets pinned on the government. It encourages privatization and deregulation, which amounts to transfer of power from government -- which people theoretically have some control over -- to corporations -- which people have no control over.
  299. Chocolate and Beatings by Shihar · · Score: 1

    You actually can have freedom shoved down your throat, it just takes a whole hell of a lot more force then the US is willing to use these days. Case in point, look at Germany and Japan. These are both nations that were occupied by the US and now are thriving democracies.

    For better or for worse, no one can stomach the formula that seemed to work so well on those nations. The real problem is that the first step in making both of those nations was to completely destroy them and blatently target the civilian populace. IE, wage total war on them and win. Whatever Iraq is, it is not an example of total war.

    So, to keep going with the analogy, you might not like it if I shove chocolate down your throat, but you probably won't complain if I first beat the living piss out of you. After the beating you might decide that didn't like the beating, but the chocolate sure was yummie.

    1. Re:Chocolate and Beatings by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      You actually can have freedom shoved down your throat, it just takes a whole hell of a lot more force then the US is willing to use these days. Case in point, look at Germany and Japan. These are both nations that were occupied by the US and now are thriving democracies.

      The big difference is that Germany and Japan coalized together to dominate the whole world and destroy Democracy. Their occupation was following their military defeat at the hands of allies, and those allies then formed the United Nations which then mandated the occupation of those countries.

      On the other hand, Irak did not attempt to dominate the whole world, but was threatening the business earnings of the Bush family. Irak did not even present a credible threat to the US or Europe either, so understandably, the UN did not mandate the US to occupy Irak (for this reason, the US secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld has cancelled a trip to Germany because he faces war-crime accusations there). Without worldwide support, the US will see it's situation in Irak becoming more and more of a burden, without ever hoping for assistance from other UN members. This means that the US will not be able to support the long-time commitment an occupation to establish Democracy would require; the most likely result would be a quick handover of sovereignty to the chiites, which will turn Irak into a civil-war mess.
    2. Re:Chocolate and Beatings by Shihar · · Score: 1

      No, you could compare Iraq and Japan very easily. Iraq's goal was and always has been to unify the Middle East under a single banner, much in the same way Japan wanted its Pacific Coprosperity Sphere. Iraq has invaded two of its neighbors, Iran and Kuwait. There was also well founded fear that Iraq wanted to invade Saudi Arabia.

      Next, the United Nations did not mandate the occupation of those nations after World War II until after they were already occupied. The UN just rubberstamped what had already been done. Further, the UN had absolutely no say in anything east of West Germany, where the Soviets implemented their brutal political systems.

      Finally, the US has proven itself more then capable of installing a democracy without the help of the UN. If you recall, the US and NATO allies launched is military campaign in the Yugoslavia region WITHOUT UN support, ended a genocide, and helped install democracies in all of those nations without the UN. The UN finally gave into UN pressure to certify the military operation AFTER the US had already started dropping bombs. The point is that when the US started to bomb Serbia, the operation was, according to the UN, illegal.

      In other examples the US got UN support to defend South Korea from North Korea, but ONLY because the USSR (foolishly) boycotted the security council meeting where the vote took place. If the USSR had not been foolish, North Korea would have been just as 'illegal' as Iraq.

      Finally, there is the case of Afghanistan. Afghanistan had a democracy installed very successfully by the US and its NATO allies. Afghanistan has already had one very successful election with a 70% turnout and has managed to disarm all of the major warlords that once ruled the non-Taliban controlled areas. All of that was done, and it was done quickly with less then 20,000 soldiers.

      As far as Iraq goes, I think you drastically underestimate the conditions of that nation. Iraq WILL have a democracy. The populace will vote in the upcoming elections. Both the Kurds and the Shiites, which make up over 70% of the population will vote. It certainly won't be perfect, but it sure as hell beats the old system. Better to have a couple of years of civil strife as they work themselves out and learn how to tolerate each other without a brutally oppressive dictator then spend the next hundred years as an autocratic society.

  300. Other free zones by doodlelogic · · Score: 1

    There is only one place in China that you enjoy the freedoms that your looking for -- Hong Kong.

    Macau?

    Taiwan?

  301. +6, +6, +6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have just seen the mythical +6 sword of Insightfulness tear through a troll like a sharpened chainsaw through a sassafras sapling.

    +5 should not describe this post.

  302. unless ur the mosad by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    If your the mosad and a killer for the israeli secret police, then you can do what you like, brake the law, murder people and flee the country on fake passports and live like 007 but on the bad side.

    Yes its true , the mosad has in the past killed innocents in Europe and often get away with it, though sometimes through thoughtlessness get caught but do little time.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  303. You think you know America by NaCl · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can in fact joke about killing the President

    Actually, you can't joke about anything.

    For example:

    two Brazilian surfers were arrested in Miami's International Airport under terrorist charges. Mizael Cabral, born in Paraíba, and Daniel Correia, from Rio de Janeiro, spent a good amount of time in Uncle Sam's land working hard to save money so that they could start a surf board factory in João Pessoa. They bought as suction pump here that would make their job a lot easier, but something really weird happened in the airport while they were going back to Brazil. According to the American authorities, they were joking about having that suction pump (pump and bomb are the same word in brazilian portuguese). The man from Paraíba supposedly asked the inspector in the airport: "Haven' you found the bomb in the bag yet?" And the one from Rio would've said: "If you open up my bag, it will explode". In cuffs, the two men were taken to Miami's Jail under the charges of "false information about explosives, with malicious intentions, irresponsibility and disregard for the human lives safety". They can be sentenced up to five years in prison and they will have to pay US$ 250 thousand dollars each. They have been in jail for almost a month and the press has no access to them.

    They are now back in Brazil, after plead guilty of terrorism! Deported.

    There is no presumption of innocence. There is no right to appeal.

    You got that right!

    --
    I shot the sheriff
  304. DON'T ANSWER HIM by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

    He's a Narc. Well, a Chinese Narc. You get the idea.

  305. How do I program this thing? by Jodka · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Speaking as a Mac OS X programmer who really wants one, but does not expect HP and Verbatim to port to OS X right away, my question is: Do HP and Verbatim tell me what I need to program this thing?

    Are there published specifications? Like the communications protocol between the drive and the driver, or between the driver and the application?

    Sorry if this is answered in TFA, I could not R becaused it is /.ed.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
  306. Meanwhile in a deep underground bunker... by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    ... a meeting is being held about a new threat to the Chinese government. Not much is known about this person, but we do know his name.. Coward, Anonymous Coward.

  307. To circumvent DUI laws in China by srobert · · Score: 1

    To drive drunk in China, just do the same as you would in the States. Turn off your headlights so that the cops won't see you.

  308. Don't forget by bobobobo · · Score: 1

    Vandalizing and defacing cars.

  309. How would they know? by LadyLucky · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My ex girlfriend is Chinese. She simply has no idea of these concepts that you are thinking about. And as other posters have pointed out, you must respect that culture. Sure, if you want you can talk with your Chinese friends about the difference between voting in a liberal western democracy and voting in China, but you can't subvert them.

    By and large they don't see that having a controlling government is a problem, because it makes the right decisions. That's the thought process. She had never seen that image of the student in front of the tank in Tiananmen square. Never. And she was happy they didn't show it in China, because it could reduce the stability of the country.

    When you can understand and respect that reasoning without trying to change it, then you are ready to go into that culture.

    --
    dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
    1. Re:How would they know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry but your sample of one is not sufficent to draw larger conclusions.

    2. Re:How would they know? by 808140 · · Score: 1

      No offense, but your ex-girlfriend is either a peasant, retarded, or lying. I live in China and that picture, while censored, is famous.

      Tiananmen happened relatively recently. Most people our age (well, my age, late twenties) remember it. It was a huge deal.

      However, the Chinese are not generally happy talking to westerners about problems their country has, just as Americans get their panties in a bunch everytime someone who isn't American dares to point out that they might have a slightly flawed foreign policy.

      Patriotism, it's a bitch.

    3. Re:How would they know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "No offense, but your ex-girlfriend is either a peasant, retarded, or lying. I live in China and that picture, while censored, is famous."

      Then you of course understand how different one's experience can be depending on where he lives.

      One thing that has been difficult for me to comprehend, is just how big China is. I don't really mean geographically, although it is a large land mass, but that's not what I mean.

      China is big. A person from one part of China, and another person from a different part of China, can be so different, they can almost be regarded as a different species. That's an exaggeration. But not much of one.

      Do you understand what I'm saying?

  310. We don't stuff freedom down throats by jgardn · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Because we have never "stuffed freedom down people's throats." People naturally desire to be free. It's part of being human. The only thing standing in their way is tyrants and oppression.

    What did we do to make Japan free? We removed the tyrants (the military culture) and removed the oppression of women.

    The same thing needs to happen in China, one way or another. Those people who wield power abusively need to be removed from their positions. Those cultural elements that oppress need to be discarded. From there, freedom will flourish, just as it has everyway else.

    --
    The radical sect of Islam would either see you dead or "reverted" to Islam.
  311. Human Rights Charter not Universal by karnat10 · · Score: 1

    All of these are basic rights for all human beings.

    That has been wishful thinking of the western countries since 1945. While many countries have made impressive advancements in the development of west-compatible institutions and economies, this doesn't necessarily mean they adopted our cultural and moral values too.

    Formal acceptance of the UN's human rights charter is necessary to participate in the "civilized world", but there's no need to actually implement and enforce them.

    Heck, even the U.S. violate human rights on a daily basis.

  312. Don't Go by tom's+a-cold · · Score: 1

    Your presence there will help prop up the existing repressive regime.

    Instead, stay here and work to ensure that our own government doesn't become that repressive, or worse. They're well on their way and it's going to take a lot of effort to stop them. Making a buck or having an interesting cultural experience in China just isn't as important.

    --
    Get your teeth into a small slice: the cake of liberty
  313. sourceforge? by brit74 · · Score: 1

    Sourceforge is on the list? But... but... Bill Gates told me that open source is communism. How can China be against communism?

  314. Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for saying that; saved me a reply :)

    Yes, respect or the place or don't go there. Whatever you think of their laws, they have them for a reason, and they're trying to build a good society, just like most other countries. What's more, they're trying to maintain values that have served them well for over an order of magnitude longer than the US has even existed for, and they just might be onto something, considering that the US has recently been pronounced one of the most unhappy societies on earth.

  315. Cites? by Dire+Bonobo · · Score: 2, Informative
    > Our economic engine was producing war time goods at a rate that all
    > the nations of the world combined could not match our power.

    Got a cite for that?

    I'm not necessarily disputing anything you're claiming; however, neither is it at all clear that what you've said is actually true. In particular...


    > There were no limits to the power we could project.

    I think you're underestimating the remaining power of the other industrialized nations at the end of WWII. Even by D-Day, Britain had enough military might remaining to take responsibility for as much of the assault as the USA.

    If you look at this link, for example, you'll see that while the USA was well-supplied with equipment, it was severely undermanned for dreams of world conquest. At the end of the war, there were about 1100 divisions available to the countries most involved, of which less than 10% were American. Moreover, this link suggests that the USA didn't enjoy such a dominant position in equipment after all; for example, the USSR was producing more tanks than the US by the end of the war.

    Given the numbers and logistics involved, your assertion of the manifest ability of the USA to "roll over" the rest of the world seems...optimistic.

    1. Re:Cites? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Okay Britain was living off lend-lease if fact they did so for some time after the war. I do not think rationing ended until around 1950.
      The Russians had a lot of tanks but they where also getting a lot of aid from the US and the did not have any navy to speak of and of course did not have any nukes until 1949 Four year of constant nuclear bombing would be rough
      Yea the US right after WWII was the single most powerful nation in the world. Good thing that world conquest was not something they wanted.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  316. Re:That is historically incorrect thinking. by DaFallus · · Score: 1

    The peasantry of China?

    They opposed 2 million Japanese troops since 1927 with nothing but militias.


    Seems like you forgot about the Rape of Nanjing

    Also, keep in mind that "opposed" simply means they fought them. Those living in Tibet "opposed" the Chinese military, for about 20 minutes...

    --
    No one cares what your captcha was

    Houston TX, USA
  317. Peekabooty by not_hylas(+) · · Score: 1

    This project could use some of the more excellent networking /. hackers.
    (I'm definitely out of my league here)
    Wanna be really elite? Code for a cause that might just be your own quite soon.

    http://www.peek-a-booty.org/pbhtml/modules.php?n am e=Content&pa=showpage&pid=1

    Ref:
    http://www.cultdeadcow.com/archives/000871 .php3

    --
    ~hylas
  318. Its probably safe.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I think it's important to note that China's government uses the censoring and the punishment of circumventing that censoring for different goals.

    By censoring they try to keep the masses uninformed. Currently a bunch of websites is blocked and search engines are limited in their results. These messures can be avoided, but most users dont know how.

    Cracks in the Great Firewall
    Probing Chinese search engine filtering

    In the punishing of circumventing these messures however, the government has simply found another excuse to put people who they don't like in jail. The people actualy being prosecuted for and convicted of these "crimes" are either members of the Falun Gong or the China Democracy Party.

    List of People Detained for Internet-related Offences in China

    With a bit of effort, you could probably enjoy everything the internet has to offer, logging in from China. And probably nothing will ever happen as a result. But when the authorities decide they don't like you they are going to hold it against you. Current sentences range upto 12 years or "unknown", while even capital punishment is a possibility.

  319. The only way I'd go to China... by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    would be carrying a rifle and fighting as part of an army to liberate the country from the bunch of gangsters currently running it.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    1. Re:The only way I'd go to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, that's the same way I feel about the USofA.

  320. ABC, is that like..? by Nikkodemus · · Score: 1

    ABC, is that like.. OPP?!

    (I'm a cracker)

    1. Re:ABC, is that like..? by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      You know...

      ABC...

      Like the gum...

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  321. There was no Japanese attempt to surrender ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    I call bullshit on your statement about dropping tha tomic bomb on Japan

    Pot. Kettle. Black. Things are far more complicated than you realize. You are as simplistic and misinformed as those you criticize. You only differ from them in terms of politics.

    Japan had already attempted to surrender to Moscow weeks before Hiroshima

    You seriously misrepresent things. Imperial Japan made an unofficial attempt to make peace with Russia. That was not a surrender to the Allies, it was an attempt to split the Allies, they were willing to continue fighting the US(1) but did not want the Russians to join in. Large segments of the government were not aware of the "feelers" to Russia, the military was not aware. The military would have instantly shot as a traitor anyone involved had they known. Hell, parts of the military staged a coup to prevent the Emporer's surrender orders from being broadcast. They wanted to separate the emporer from the "traitors and cowards" who were "deceiving" him. And that was after two atomic bombs(2).

    the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were one of the greatest massacres in the history of the world

    Actually conventional bombings from World War II inflicted greater casualties than the atomic bombings. Read up on Dresden for example. While you are at it read up on Nanking.

    (1) Imperial Japan was willing to continue fighting the US in part because they were preparing both nuclear and biological attacks on the US. The had conducted extensive biological warfare research on Chinese prisoners, conducted field trial on Chinese villages, and were preparing to deliver biological agents to the US homeland via balloons and submarine launched aircraft. Perparations were also underway to deliver radiological material to the US homeland.

    (2) I've seen Imperial Japanese Army training films showing soldiers training while covered in white sheets. The sheets were an attempt to reduce casualties from the flash of an atomic bomb.

  322. Oh gawd, here we go again. by emjoi_gently · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No matter what the topic, it can always be turned into an Iraq bitchfest.

  323. One thing have we by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    1s /\cc355 to 1nt3rn3t. M05t 0f t1m3 w3 c4n 5urf 4nd m4ny m4ny p3op13 th1|\/k w3 411 s3nD sp4m, but it 15 s1mply ju5t b1g li3.

    cl1ck bel0w to f1nd out h0w b1g B1g it Is.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  324. misinformation by TheOverlord · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm writing this way too late to get modded high enough for anyone to see but maybe someone will see it and it'll help. The irony is that I'm so late in posting as I'm in China and just woke up this morning.

    I was here briefly last summer and am now doing a semester abroad. China really is not that a bad of a place to be. It seems most of the replies are very negative or sarcastic about the security situation in China. In all seriousness, living here as a foreigner is not that bad. Sure you have to deal with weird, to the US, government regulations, but I don't feel as though I'm under an iron fist or anything. Just respect the culture and their customs/laws and you will have a great time.

    Oh and if you take the time to learn even a bit of the language it can help immensely. I know I've run into many people who were much more cordial when I told them (in Chinese) that I was a student here learning the language.

    Everyone has different experiences, especially if you are ABC or even look remotely Chinese. But instead of listening to a bunch of other people talk about it, just take a 2 week trip to China and see for yourself. I think more Americans need to get out and see the realities of the world (although my cynicism says that when the they do the average Americans will do something stupid, get into trouble, and then blame it not on themselves but on the country they are in)

  325. Yeah they'll love that.. by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    They'll end up shooting you and sending the bill for the bullets to your parents. Don't go, don't fuck with draconian extremist nut case governments.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  326. HA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better to ask while outside of the great wall of Amerika.
    Remember, 9 year olds are prosecuted as terrorists for stick figure drawings now.
    Hail Bush!
    Hail the great Republican party
    Hail the skull and bones club; AKA Deaths Head Nazi party.

    Yeah, I hope I am really anonomous!
    But it is true...

  327. Re: Democracy is not a basic right by [cx] · · Score: 0

    Democracy is not a basic right, but thank you for spelling compatible wrong over and over.

    Democracy is a form of government, not a right.

    Please don't think it's the "right" of other countries to give the "right" of democracy and freedom to other countries. Because we all know you don't give freedom by dropping bombs.

    [cx]

  328. currency control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may also want to make sure you can take the money you earned in china with you when you decide to leave.

  329. Flag on the play... by Pii · · Score: 1
    Is it not also fair to say that if the Chinese are ever to be free like their western counterparts, then the people of China must take an active role in making that happen?

    People of the west enjoy their current lot in life because at some point in their histories, they threw off the yoke of tyranny. Nobody gave it to them. They had to take it.

    The people of oppressed cultures have to take some responsibility in securing their own futures.

    --
    For those that would die defending it, Freedom
    has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
  330. WW2 generation by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    Oops, forgot one comment ...

    I doubt that popular opinion will ever coincide with this until all the WWII vets are dead and gone.

    Again, things are not as simple as you believe. As time passes we learn that Imperial Japan's crimes are greater than originally believed. For example the biological research conducted on Chinese civilians. That only became common knowledge, well in the US, relatively recently. It was classified for many years because the US government made a deal with the Imperial Japanese war criminals who conducted the research. We traded their freedom for their knowledge. Their notes and other materials advanced our bio warfare program a decade or more. The Imperial Japanese researchers who used Chinese civilians as lab rats, actually I think they referred to them in reports as "logs", were free to pursue their normal lives after the war and become leaders in Japanese politics, medicine, and business.

    1. Re:WW2 generation by futuretaikonaut · · Score: 1

      It perhaps would have been wiser to actually cite REAL AUTHORITATIVE evidence in your arguments rather than simply state disjointed suppositions as facts as recklessly as I did. I wasn't expecting this kind of flaming, or I would have been more careful. I know now that the source I chose to cite was probably not the best, but at the same time, aside from its obvious flaws, it does at least show a thoroughly researched side of an argument. Admittedly, Japanese surrender was not as likely as I may have made it seem, but it is impossible to ignore the evidence that certain members of the Japanese polity at the time were considering it, and it is impossible now to guess how much more fighting would have been necessary to garner a Japanese surrender, if not peace. Your arguments, however, seem to be more predicated on a vilification of the Japanese as a race and nation, rather than proving that the Japanese would have continued fighting if the bomb had not been dropped. Japanese war atrocities are well documented. Do the sick actions of a fascist government therefore necessitate the murder of innocent civilians? Can you really justify the decades long suffering and pain caused by nuclear fallout, when you yourself cite Japanese atrocities as examples of the cruelty of men?

    2. Re:WW2 generation by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

      It perhaps would have been wiser to actually cite REAL AUTHORITATIVE evidence in your arguments rather than simply state disjointed suppositions as facts as recklessly as I did.

      You did not cite facts. You presented one side of an argument as fact. Assuming your source is not some crackpot you misunderstood actual scholarly opionions. For example "We dropped the bomb on Japan specifically because we wanted to ensure that the Japanese surrendered to the United States, instead of the Soviets." The real scholarly opinion is something like Japan attempted to make a separate peace with the Soviets to prevent Soviet entry into the war. Re-read your line and think of the illogic. How can you surrender to a third party to end a war waged against someone else?

      Imperial Japan's biological warfare research in China and planned biological and radiological attacks on the US are not "supposition".

      Admittedly, Japanese surrender was not as likely as I may have made it seem, but it is impossible to ignore the evidence that certain members of the Japanese polity at the time were considering it, and it is impossible now to guess how much more fighting would have been necessary to garner a Japanese surrender, if not peace.

      All you really offer is that Imperial Japan was not a hive mind and that there were some dissenters. That proves nothing. Admiral Yamamoto was against the treaty with Hitler, against war with the US, yet despite his rank well earned respectability he had to be sequestered on board warships to prevent assassination by pro-war Army officers. However when his orders came he oversaw the development and execution of a brilliant attack on the US. It did not matter that he thought it was a bad idea and that he believed the war would begin to turn against Japan in 6-12 months.

      Do the sick actions of a fascist government therefore necessitate the murder of innocent civilians? Can you really justify the decades long suffering and pain caused by nuclear fallout, when you yourself cite Japanese atrocities as examples of the cruelty of men?

      Fighting was not strictly necessary although a massive invasion was planned. One strategy could have been to blockade the islands and "starve them out". Invasion or blockade, the fact remains that Japanese casualties probably would have been far higher than those of the atomic attacks. Sometimes aggressively prosecuting a war to unconditional surender costs fewer lives than the alternatives. There is certainly a strong argument that this holds true for the war with Imperial Japan. Again, I'll offer my main point, things are far more complicated than you believe. In other words, your analysis is superficial. It actually seems more political than historical.

    3. Re:WW2 generation by futuretaikonaut · · Score: 1

      I was NOT playing the race card. You did NOT make clear that your statements were about Imperial Japan, rather than the Japanese at large, because there is not a semantic agreement that the "Imperial" Japanese are any different than normal Japanese of the time. You should be more specific about whom you mean to be perceived as the even fascist torturers, and the normal citizens of a nation. If you read your post, and remove the assumption that your reader will infer that "Imperial" is a different designation, your post comes off as being written by a narrowminded bigot. Furthermore, given that you do not have either the intelligence or respect to even bother reading up on the source of my arguments (which, although criticized by some, remains the fullest and mst informed body of work to EVER be written about the decision to drop the atomic bomb) I think that it is wise to let this argument drop. Brashly saying that my arguments appear more political than historical without even bothering to check shows a noted hypocrisy in your argument. Kettle black, indeed.

    4. Re:WW2 generation by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

      You did NOT make clear that your statements were about Imperial Japan, rather than the Japanese at large, because there is not a semantic agreement that the "Imperial" Japanese are any different than normal Japanese of the time.

      Give up the pathetic damage control. How can repeatedly inserting the word "Imperial" in front of "Japan" or "Japanese" NOT imply something different. From dictionary.com:
      "adjective 1. The part of speech that modifies a noun or other substantive by limiting, qualifying, or specifying"
      Does that clear up your semantic agreement problem?

      Furthermore, given that you do not have either the intelligence or respect to even bother reading up on the source of my arguments.

      Your argument was a rediculous misstatement of a well known arguement. I am quite familiar with the real arguments and Imperial Japan's feelers with the USSR. Do not confuse criticism of your befuddlement with criticism and the real arguments.

  331. Chinese Internet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IS SLOW!!! Besides that things aren't that bad, and I guess I've heard that some fast connections can be had, but where I'm sitting at (Guilin-southern China), things aint that fast. Pretty much like dial-up most of the time, no matter how fast the internet company says you're connection is.

    The government doesn't allow you access to certain pages, it's true. Some news sites (BBC, CNN, Google News are ones that come to mind that I've had problems with). YOu know, also, don't be looking around for stuff about falong gong, or tianan men, as you're probably not gonna find it. Various web-pages, it seems often ones that Google hasn't picked up yet, also can't be had often.

    I've found the very easy and simple solution is to use proxy servers. Using them I haven't had any problem whatsoever getting pages that I wanted to look at. The times this is harder are when you're travelling and have to use some windoze machine and can't find the proxy settings as everything's in Chinese :)

    Besides that, enjoy it here if you come. Despite what some people began to talk about (I only read the very first few replies), there is little to no problems to be had with the government on the whole in any way whatsoever. Just don't get to spreading religion or democracy and you're fine (and don't worry, youre general Chinamen is a capitalist through and through). I'm suspecting some of the other problems (shipping the knife in the mail is one I read) are due more to the fact that there are communication issues. Those kinds of things are possible to do in China. THey just need to be slowly talked out.

    Best of luck.

  332. Cultural Imperialism is a good thing, dammit by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

    The "Rights of Man" are a culturally defined idea.

    Bullshit. Human rights are absolute and universal.

    Any culture that doesn't respect them is evil and inferior, and the sooner said culture is changed or replaced, the better.

    Gah...I hate moral relativists.

    --
    I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    1. Re:Cultural Imperialism is a good thing, dammit by utlemming · · Score: 1
      Actually, I am not a moral relativists -- I believe in inherent rights of man, and I believe that Truth is Truth regardless of what you believe. Morality has absolutely no bearing in any of my statements.

      The sum of my position is simply that of a neo-classical liberal: the rights of individual freedom are paramount. However, I don't believe that anyone has the right to force their views on another in any way. Since some people don't share our view point of basic human rights, it is wrong to force another on that view point. Frankly, the view point of China and the actions of its Government are reprehensable, wrong, and it should not be. My position is that we have no right to force our beliefs on another country unless that countries views and actions are direct threat to us.

      --
      The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
  333. Re:Have you ever LIVED in CHINA? by aCC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've lived there and seen it for myself.

    I lived for 4 months in Baoji and then for 2.5 years in Shanghai. My girlfriend lived for 2 years in Baoji working in University and Middle Schools and for 6 months in Beijing. So, I've seen and experienced probably more than you.

    Living in China made me realize how much freedom we have in the west. Yes, many people speak quite openly about what they dislike. As do most people still believe Mao was the greatest person on earth (put some "70% good, 30% bad" in it to water it a bit down). But you realize how much freedom is missing when people criticize the government and keep looking over their shoulders if no strangers are listening. Can you imagine bashing Bush in Central Park in New York or bashing Blair in London and worrying that someone might hear it and get you into trouble? Privately and with foreigners they don't risk too much by being honest.

    The worst thing about China in my experience is the utterly useless and terrible media (because of the extreme censorship) and the non-existing legal system. So, theoretically many people have rights. But when a street with its buildings gets completely destroyed outside the university (as happened in Baoji) to make room for a wider road, then theoretically all the shop owners and restaurant owners get compensated for losing their main source of income. But they don't and they don't even think about going to court because it's useless.

    It's true about the police, but only because the police actually has little rights. The communist party is the ruler and they take care of things. But aside from that Chinese are in most cases very decent people (much more than in the west) because of peer pressure to not lose face for the family and other reasons.

    Go there for a longer period of time and you'll see what the real deal is. Most people only go for some weeks or months and haven't even scratched the surface. The Chinese people are very good at making you believe things are great and only later you find out that things actually aren't great.

    (Not often that I see the precious chicken (Baoji) mentioned on /. :-) )

  334. Brutal Techniques, all right... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 0, Troll

    According to British detainees held with Mr Habib and since released, "one of the prostitutes stood over him naked while he was strapped to the floor and menstruated on him".

    Wow, that is truly brutal. How is the guys still alive? Personally, I don't think I could have taken that for more than, say several minutes before breaking. And that bit about pigs heads being put on the photos of his kids...SHOCKING!

    If this is what the most dangerous Muslims in the world are made of, I'm glad I have George Jr. to protect me....

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  335. Re:Obvious Point: Torture of Rebiya Kadeer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taiwanese investing in China... hmm... seems to me that the best way to control something is to own it right? It would seem that the Taiwanese may have realized that boycotting one of the largest producing countries in the world is a bit ineffective.

    I'd also suggest that tack for all the people who don't like a business' practices in other countries. If the Southern Baptists in the US had all bought Disney stock years ago, there would only be Southern Baptist T.V. shows now (the buying power of the largest (depending on how you count it) religious group in the US is rather great), but instead they dumped all their stock, stopped buying Disney toys and movies and quit watching ABC.

  336. nickname by schnitzi · · Score: 1

    Solo Han writes: ...pr0n...

    Suitable nickname you have...

    --



    I object to that article, and to the next reply.
  337. Mmmm Tsing Dao $.50 by Dragonbate · · Score: 1

    Spent a year and a half in China from '96-98. Loved it been back many times. Accessed pretty much anything I wanted through public web access. Even played online games though they lagged a bit. Now i understand they are rolling out broadband in Nanjing where I stayed. Never really had any bad experiences with government or police besides standing in line for visa issues. (the wait was shorter than it would have been here in the states at a similar govt agency though). Loved the food but avoided the meat. Good cheap beer. I loved the people so much I brought one home. Unless you are ABC you WILL be stared at from time to time. I avoided politics and would suggest same. Have a great time.

  338. No, no, no by hajihill · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not 'American, born-Chinese', IT IS American-Born Chinese.

    This term refers to someone who's family line comes from the region of the planet referred to as China, but is unfamiliar with the ways and customs of the Chinese culture and government.

    This is a problem because they will not afford you the same courtesy they would an obviously "white" American due to his explainable ignorance of their ways and customs. An ABC gets no slack in China. They are expected to be aware of the way things are done, and if anything are treated worse due to their ignorance of what could be thought of as "their own culture".

    Obviously this is a close minded viewpoint, but it does happen to ABC who visit China.

    --
    Of blankness, I know nothing.
    1. Re:No, no, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's common in most cultures. I "come" from another Asian country (not far east). I put it in quotes because I have the citizenship, but never lived there (born and raised in a totally different culture).

      Whenever I meet someone from my "original" country, I get precisely the treatment you described. Which is why I spend my time helping people from other countries. It's somewhat natural. They'll treat people of other cultures well, but will have all sorts of rules for those from their own culture. I can't help them, because they won't take it from me. So I live my life among others, who will readily accept me (although probably treat their own in the same way too).

      Just life.

    2. Re:No, no, no by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      I imagine the same thing happens to a BBC, am I correct?

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    3. Re:No, no, no by JaxGator75 · · Score: 1
      Fine programming on that BBC... Love those documentaries!

      --
      Come and see the violence inherent in the system!
  339. Re:How many Republican KKK members have you heard by AutoTheme · · Score: 1

    Byrd? No wait. He's a modern day Dem.

  340. Re:Noble ideal by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

    But from a practical standpoint, without the occasional war to keep civillization ordered, the world would balkanize and we'd live in what would amount to a state of eternal war with all 20 of the countries within 5 miles of us. Right of war and nationalism keep things from being as bad as they could be, and thus they have my general support.

    --
    ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
  341. How to bring freedom to China for the long-term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Tell President Bush there is a nation out there that isn't "free". Whatever that means exactly.
    2. Inform him the nation in question is called China. Someone may have to point out to him that China is not just `what cups and plates are made of`. Tell him they `hate` the Western ideals and freedom, and are of a different religion too.
    3. Wait for inevitable "War On China" to unfold.

    1. Re:How to bring freedom to China for the long-term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say crush your enemies. See them driven before you. Listen to the lamentation of the women.

      YARRRRRGH~!!!!!!!!

  342. You have the right to do what you are told... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By the government.

    Unless you have to steal and trade blood for in which case Dubya will invade and bring great instability and death to your country.

    1. Re:You have the right to do what you are told... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DUDE.

      Do they even have camel jockeys in China? We're not going to invade unless we see camel jockeys. Maybe the resistance should, like, organize some kind of derby or something.

      Walmart makes towels over there. Have everyone wrap a fucking towel around their head, and don't shower for a year. Also, make all the rice-eating bitches wear robes. And kill all the rival shoguns.

  343. Retardation is not a worldview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sub-human trash, go wait in line at the death camp for your turn. You'll make the world a better place by fertilizing the ground than polluting the air with the stench of your breath. Shithead.

  344. China does have freedom of speech by hqm · · Score: 1

    To paraphrase an old joke about the USSR:

    In China they have freedom of speech.
    They have freedom of assembly.
    They have freedom to criticize their government.

    In America, we have freedom *after* speech, etc.

    1. Re:China does have freedom of speech by lifespan · · Score: 0

      Didn't you mean speech in America is free, but only if you agree?

      --
      -- Howto: Get +5 (1) Whine about M$ (2) Namedrop Gentoo (3) Casually Abuse Mods (4) Namedrop Early Computer Model
    2. Re:China does have freedom of speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Didn't you mean speech in America is free, but only if you agree?"

      You don't know of anyone in the US who has been jailed solely for expressing his views. You cannot seriously make a case that this is the situation. I'm not talking about inciting violence. I'm talking about writing or speech or assembly in a peaceable manner, in a place where the person has a right to be. I have some examples where assembly rights have been abridged, but the basic rights to free speech have been preserved, and the only challenges have been in situations where there is a cogent argument to be heard that damage is done by the speech, writing, or assembly (e.g., your rights are not protected if they include violating someone else's rights, or if they involve doing harm or destruction to public or private property.)

      I have not always been happy with "time, place, and manner" restrictions on First Amendment activities. But we're talking about China here. I remember 1989 like it was yesterday. I know a fair number of people from all different parts of China, including a few old folks who left just before Mao took over, and quite a few students who have left China only recently.

      To me, the most striking aspects are in the very different attidudes between people from the country and people from the city. It is almost as if the Chinese treat each other as a different *species*. It really is very strange, much more pronounced than the differences between city and country people in the US or Europe.

      Do you know what I'm talking about?

    3. Re:China does have freedom of speech by paolooprandi · · Score: 1

      Even if you agree you are not free - you are just accepting

  345. Don't be jerk. by DJ_Perl · · Score: 1

    "This is China."

    -- "The Diamond Age", Neal Stephenson

    --
    -- Subvert the dominant paradigm. Repeat as desired. http://ownlifeful.com/
  346. fuck you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1000 yeah

  347. Re:It also helps by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

    That the concept of "rights" is a figment of a couple nutters in western history. I mean, had it been worded "a ruler should not overly restrict the actions of his followers, except when necessary", it would have gone over a little better in China. And been called "Taoism". As it is, it's worded as "Freedom and democracy are basic human rights" implying that the universe itself somehow favors these things, which is something... well, completely factually wrong. In fact, the entirety of Locke's "because I said so" philosophy is kind of ideally geared to simply annoy the hell out of whoever doesn't already share the guy's viewpoint... I'm not particularly suprised that the Chinese haven't jumped on the "natural rights of man" bandwagon.

    --
    ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
  348. For 3D fun by Kludge · · Score: 1

    Internet sucks, particularly outside of Beijing and Shanghai.

    My best internet experience was in Suzhou, not Shanghai. In Shanghai I couldn't find a place to hook up my own laptop for a reasonable price. The best way to maintain internet freedom is to have a VPN or ssh accounts back here in the states. Tunnel through those.

    Expect to be cold most of the time.

    That's funny, it was warm and muggy when I was there.

    The Chinese are very proud of Chinese herbal medicine.

    This is true. Don't worry about taking your own medicine, however. The doctor we visited definitely knew what he was doing and laughed at the herbals that we had been given.

  349. This story blocked in china! by goodbye_kitty · · Score: 1

    In Shanghai at the moment, funnily enough my first couple of tries to access this discussion topic came up as HTTP500 errors ..spooky =O

  350. Yay! /. becomes a site for breaking laws... by Kanasta · · Score: 1

    now China has a legit reason to ban it.

  351. Every territory was claimed by war by Changa_MC · · Score: 1

    Perhaps we should give Texas back to Mexico, since we killed all the mexicans living there and "stole" it. Or perhaps you should realize that war has nothing to do with right and wrong.

    --
    Changa hates change.
  352. Re:That is historically incorrect thinking. by vertinox · · Score: 1

    Also, keep in mind that "opposed" simply means they fought them.

    Nanjing was an attrocity against an occupied city of civilians and not a major battle against Nationalist or Communist Chinese forces. Otherwise it wouldn't have been called "the rape".

    Perhaps you should read up on the Sino-Japanese War. Sure Japan occupied a great deal of China... Well so did Germany occupy a great deal of Russia, but neither China nor Russia were totally defeated (Tibet is a poor example because they were defeated unconditioanlly). In most occupied territories of China the Japanese, had a hard time with resistance as well.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  353. Re:Well... actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where I come from
    ABC = Australian Born Chinese

  354. stupid subject line above. Try "Tabula rasa" by thomasa · · Score: 1

    put in wrong subject line gosh this is a bad day

  355. cgi-proxy by valdean · · Score: 1
    I used to live in China, and have a great proxy solution: a simple http proxy program called cgi-proxy.

    You need to install it on a non-Chinese server. After that, you'll be able to access it so long as it's in a directory under public_html (you should password protect this directory so only you can use it). I paid $7.95 a month to a hosting company in New Jersey to use it (as part of a shared hosting package)... worked perfectly except for https sites, which it wisely doesn't allow because the link from the server running cgi-proxy to you isn't secured. I still use it today, actually, to read my personal email while I'm at work... you can access any port you want, so it's great for web email programs like Neomail, Horde, etc. that are blocked by firewalls.

  356. Cold by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    You'll lose 25 pounds in two weeks. Be prepared for that. You'll probably also catch a cold your first week there. Speaking of cold, everyone wears a jacket all the time. It's a cold winter over there right now. Expect to be cold most of the time

    I think you're talking about Beijing. In southern China it's winter, but for instance in Hong Kong today it's 19C. Never gets below 10C, and I expect I'll be back at the beach within a month. Beijing has a really shitty climate, hot and dusty in summer, freezing in winter. In HK it's pleasant most of the time except for the very humid monsoon (July-September), and of course typhoons. Just remerber that China is as big and varied as the US as it goes for climate, food, amd most other things. What applies in New York may not in Miami.

  357. Best. Domain. Evar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really!

  358. Moving to China: by Upaut · · Score: 1

    It depends: are you moving/traveling to former British China, or interior mainland China? Are you going to an economically strong, ethnically diverse region, or a poor farming area? If you go to either Hong Kong, or Shanghai, you will be fine. Buy a graphics card. Try to bring it back. Have fun. Heck, Hong Kong still sounds more English than Chinese in many parts.
    The police are there to protect you, but also to protect the people. They don't want change. They are a very large country, and so they are naturally unstable. All we read about is them trying to maintain a hold on their country, and at the moment, despite all their problems, everyone gets fed. So as long as you don't threaten their stability, you will be fine. Shooting an Americain (especially if you are white or black), is a big no no. They do not want to trigger a new version of the sinking of the Lusitania. So mainly, worry not. If you are a woman, learn the word "pregnant". They will not arrest (on most occasions), and mainly treat civily a pregnant woman, despite law violation.
    Thats about all I can say, from asking family and friends about their trips and for advice. I myself am planning a trip, even though my family history in China ended kinda violently... But hey, one cannot live in the past, right?

    --
    3 degrees of separation from Vladimir Putin
  359. Let's try Reality 101 by Aexia · · Score: 1

    In practice the past four years, the Bush White House has assumed a much larger control of how his party governs itself in the House and Senate than previous presidents. Republicans are expected to support the President no matter what and independence is punished. Bush has had unprecedented say in, for example, who chairs the various committees. Note how quickly the wrath of the right came down upon Judiciary chair-to-be Arlen Specter when he said Bush shouldn't expect to get a rubber-stamp on his nominees.

    Compare to this to Clinton's exercise in cat herding his first two years in office with a Democratic controlled House and Senate.

  360. e.g. USA by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1
    This may be a strange concept to you, but for many people in the world, freedom and democracy are not their top priorities. Often, security and prosperity trump it.

    Speaking as a European I don't see why any American would find this a strange concept given the outcome of your last election.

    1. Re:e.g. USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You might not get this in your media over in Europe, but the outcome of the last election had nothing to do with "security and prosperity". It had to do with J-J-J-Jesus.

      A few months ago, I was convinced that Kerry was going to win for one simple reason. The 2000 election was a statistical tie. Everybody that voted for Gore was going to vote for Kerry. And not everybody that voted for Bush was going to vote for him again.

      And that is exactly what happened... just that I did not count on one factor. Four million evangelical religious fanatics (i.e. the American Taliban) that did not vote in 2000 turning out in 2004. It was those people, who think that Bush is a messenger from God, that decided the election.

      When you look at the voter turnout trends from 2000 to 2004, the places where voter turnout rose was all in redneck Bible country - places that fear Gay Marriage much more than planes hitting buildings. And those people decided the election more than any single factor.

  361. Re:Obvious Point: Torture of Rebiya Kadeer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You must be a Taiwanese. If Taiwanese investment in China buys them security, I won't argue with that proposition although I believe it to be false.

    The American government should terminate support for Taiwan immediately. When Taipei whines, we give them the same bullsh|t reason that you just stated.

    By the way, the majority of spies who have stolen American military technology to give to Beijing is Taiwanese.

  362. I won't bother replying to them all... by dalutong · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are some serious misunderstandings about China being voiced here -- even by people who have gone there. I can understand this. I spent seven years in China and saw many misunderstandings both by people who had just gotten there and by people who had lived there but never bothered to really immerse themselves in it.

    China is a wonderful place. The people are nice. The culture is respect-worthy. The landscape is beautiful. The history is intoxicating.

    Is there corruption, especially in the really rural areas? Yes. But if you understand the culture and the guanxi (relationships) system then you will have few problems. They ask for 15 RMB for something that is supposed to be free? Give it. Who cares? It's two bucks. Though usually, if you speak some chinese, you can demonstrate that you are a friend of the country and of its people and get around with no hassles.

    As for the government's rejection of human rights -- things are relative. I don't approve of everything that the Chinese government does, but I also appreciate that there is an amount of ethnorelativism that needs to be engaged consciously. For instance, the UN definition of human rights includes a provision that allows everyone to live at a certain basic level -- something we know as welfare. But Americans wouldn't submit to that being a human right. Much of the world's declaration of human rights is not considered valid in the developing world because people see them as western-defined examples of human _needs_ -- something everyone accepts. (Read Azar. Human needs fit into three groups -- security (food, protection, water, etc), acceptance (for whatever group you identify with) and access to/participation in the institutions that allocate resources (markets or governments.)

    As for Internet access -- it is easy to come by. It isn't the fastest stuff in the world (esp. outside of the big cities) but the blocks are nominal. You can get around them as well. Some methods are mentioned in this thread.

    You shouldn't worry about having your freedoms repressed. Just be sensitive. Just like you wouldn't walk around Saudi Arabia (as a woman) wearing a bikini top screaming "you should be allowed to do this too!" you don't walk around China doing things that aren't culturally acceptable. It is disrespectful. And in China respect means a lot.

    So I hope you do it. The best seven years of my life (so far) were those spent in China. It was a mind-opening experience. If you have any questions you can email me. (Just make sure that you write a good subject line so I don't click "junk.") Take care! Oh, and don't listen to anyone who says China sucks or is oppressive. The experience of individuals can be awful anywhere. But statistically speaking the vast majority of Chinese and of foreigners live happily.

    --

    What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    1. Re:I won't bother replying to them all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "As for the government's rejection of human rights -- things are relative."

      Human rights are absolute, and transcend any government or any other consideration.

      Until you can accept that you will never understand human rights.

    2. Re:I won't bother replying to them all... by dalutong · · Score: 1

      You obviously didn't read the rest of the paragraph. If they are absolute (as defined by the UN) then we violate them because we don't provide a basic level of security (meaning food, shelter, etc) to all of our citizens.

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
  363. ron paul by hitchhacker · · Score: 1

    The PATRIOT act passed because a majority in the House and Senate thought it was a good idea

    in regards to the patriot act:
    "It's my understanding the bill wasn't printed before the vote -- at least I couldn't get it. They played all kinds of games, kept the House in session all night, and it was a very complicated bill. Maybe a handful of staffers actually read it, but the bill definitely was not available to members before the vote." -- Ron Paul R(TX)

    -metric
    1. Re:ron paul by kibler · · Score: 1

      As a Republican Texan, I must say that Ron Paul is either full of crap or a blithering idiot. I don't care if he has a "R(TX)" after his name. I tend to lean towards he is full of crap. Do you really think that the whole Senate and House voted on something no one had seen? If you do, then you are living in conspiracy theory land.

    2. Re:ron paul by hitchhacker · · Score: 1
      As a Libertarian Texan, I must say that I respect Ron Paul for staying level headed after 9/11.
      Do you really think that the whole Senate and House voted on something no one had seen?
      Do you really think they often read the bills they vote on?
      Remember, they voted for the PATRIOT act in the hysteria a bit over a month after 9/11.
      The sponsor/cosponsor of the bill and the party leaders probably read it.

      Representatives vote the way their party votes.

      -metric
  364. Re:Obvious Point: Torture of Rebiya Kadeer by Orbital+Observer · · Score: 1

    Point taken, but "China's products" are the world's products.

    --
    ---- I have nothing more to add.
  365. China is great, as long as you are not Chinese... by WhiteManInChina · · Score: 1

    I've been living in Shenzhen for more than 4 years and have found it is a great place to live and work, as a foreigner. The internet is slow, unreliable and censored, but you get used to it and eventually learn how to setup an illegal satellite dish to get your news fix. Living in China is not for everyone though. It is terribly overcrowded, polluted, and generally disgusting in many ways. Few foreigners can tollerate the extreme differences in the environment, so there are not that many of us here. It's a great place to do business though.

  366. Freedom IS an incompatible world view with China by katharsis83 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Freedom is not an incompatable world view."

    Freedom? Freedom from? Freedom to? None of these concepts are core to Chinese philosophy. You are not born free according to traditional Eastern philosophy; you are born into a complex web of social interaction and obligations.

    "Democracy is not an incompatable world view."

    Yeah it is.

    Democracy is completely alien to the Chinese worldview; it only came through Canton/HK after the Western powers invaded in the 18th/19th centuries. Chinese philosophy, especially Confucius and Mencius, advocated human existence as simply a set of key relationships. There's no such thing as a formal developement of individualism in China; traditional Chinese philosophy views the basic unit of society as the family, not the person. Your obligations to society define your role; try reading up on it sometime. Collective good >> individual; has been so for the past 3000 years in China. Communism is not at all incompatible with Chinese tradition.

    "Human rights are not an incompatable world view."

    The concept of inalienable human rights is totally foreign to China. You are not born with rights in traditional Chinese society; you are born with obligations you parents, your family, and your (historically) Emporer.

    "Equality under the law is not an incompatable world view."

    This one is interesting. Chinese history is full of specific examples of law and philosophy that espouse DIFFERENT punishments for DIFFERENT classes of people; this has been the case since the existence of the Tang Code - the predominant legal system in ALL of ASIA. Japan's law system up until the Meiji era was based on this system. This system specfiically CODIFIED different punishments depending on if you were related to the Emperor, whether you were an official, or had money and could pay to have your punishments reduced.

    This was not arbitrary and evil; it was based on specific philosophy from Confucious. the Confucian school of thought held that Junzi, or those educated elite, should not be held to the same laws as the peasants; moral law should guide them and terrestrial law should be limited to application to peasants.

    Your view is purely that from a Western society; freedom, by it's very nature, cannot be forced down a society's throat - witness Iraq. You must have a tradition of open thought and philosophy to set the stage for democracy to even start. It's foolish to think you can export your 3 branches of government to China along with the Bill of Rights (or what's left of it after Patriot Act I) and expect everyone in the world to be jolly. China WILL become a democratic society, but expecting overnight change from a country with 4000+ years of contrary philosophy and traditions is naiive.

  367. Many many misconceptions...American News sucks by katharsis83 · · Score: 1

    "So the Chinese Army did not send in tanks to stop students protesting?"

    Very true and tragic; the students at Tian An Men truly were heroes. Nothing I can say about that. Hopefully one day those who ordered the massacre will be put on trial.

    "So those executions I saw where they had the people kneel and put a bullet in their brain never happened?"

    Injecting people with poison or frying them with high voltage isn't exactly humane either. America and China are in similar places when executing people.

    "So there really is freedom of religion and speech in China?"

    Westerners seem to single out Falun Gong; one of the big reasons the government has a problem with Falun Gong is because it advocates spiritual treatment over medical treatment. I agree their handling of it is wrong, but many in Chinese cities have died because they refused medical care and just meditated. The means are wrong, but I think it's also wrong to lie to poor rural peasants and tell them that they don't have to go to the hospital when they have life-threatening illnesses.

    "So the Chinese government does not make huge amounts of money from prison labor?"

    This is true. Conditions in Chinese jails are truly terrible. There've been stories circulating from the 1960's and 1970's that food was so scarce that inamtes began to kill fellow inmates and eat them. I can make no excuses about this.

    "And the Chinese did not lob missiles over an island full of people to keep them in line?"

    You mean the Taiwan problem. I agree lobbing missles over Taiwan is dumb and counter-productive. China, however, has a right to ensure it's territorial integrity. I believe in peaceful eventual reunification with Taiwan - BY the will of the people of Taiwan. The pro-independence movement in Taiwan is not a majority among the populace there. If Hawaii or Alaska tried to break away, the US government would do the same. In fact, the US just bombed another country for no reason than simple suspicions and neo-conservative politics. Interesting, huh?

    1. Re:Many many misconceptions...American News sucks by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "Injecting people with poison or frying them with high voltage isn't exactly humane either. America and China are in similar places when executing people."
      There are several difference between the executions in the US and China.
      1. In the US it is only for Murder one.
      2. In the US it is after a trial and usually many appeals.
      3. In the US people can protest it and try and change it. I am not for capital punishment.

      As to freedom of religion no I am not singeing out Falun Gong. How about Buddhists? Can they get any of the Dali Lama's books? Several secs of Christianity as well have had issues.

      Plus no mention of freedom of speech. There is none.
      So what you are saying is that the American news is pretty much correct about China.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Many many misconceptions...American News sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Can they get any of the Dali Lama's books?

      I believe they can but it is not called buddism there, it is called Lamaism.

    3. Re:Many many misconceptions...American News sucks by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I believe your wrong. The Dali Lama is banned in China. Atleast the part of China that was Tibet.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  368. life in Shanghai - 4 years by root-a-begger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have lived in Shanghai for 4 years (U.S. born, white male). Life in Shanghai is very easy. Its simply a very large city...other than that, there is nothing that a normal U.S. citizen would find "oppressive". If you are a person who is compelled to stand on street corners in the U.S. and stir up a riot over government policies, then neither the U.S. nor China are for you at the moment. But if you are a normal person who isn't interested in stirring a revolution, China is simply not an oppressive place. You can have small group and one-on-one conversations about anything you want (even politically sensitive issues). You can access almost any content you may desire over the net (some porn sites have been blocked...some chinese political content (in Madarin, so you couldn't read it anyway) has been blocked)...but google works as you would expect and most any business which requires internet access can be conducted fairly easily. Sure, doing things like extending your visa requires going to a gov building and waiting in line, but how often do you do this? Its not much different than going to a U.S. gov office. Other services are mostly private/free-enterprise and are very easily accessed; your largest barrier is language. As with almost any travel around the world, an open mind and a friendly smile will do lots to improve your experience. In terms of the Internet...it is very slow to access non-China servers. This is caused by two major issues: 1 - the "Great Firewall" and 2 - enormous amounts of local traffic (lots of it due to infected PCs). Best guess is that its item 2 that is the biggest problem with traffic, since the content filter isn't real-time (or so it would appear). MS's recent announcement to not continue to security patch unlicensed copies of Windows will no doubt add to this problem. As to other places besides Shanghai, well this is the top city China for westerners to do business so its the easiest...for anywhere else you can scale down your expectations on services from here; but freedom of expression, movement, etc...are all pretty smooth so long as your not here to stir up trouble. Good luck to you...

  369. This is what happens when you mourn Zhao by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/5/1/24/n791584.htm

  370. Red Corner by AhaIndia · · Score: 1

    Please watch Red Corner before leaving to china.

    --
    ~Aha~
  371. Cousins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chinese people in the current generation don't have a lot of cousins. Their parents were the first generation to get the effect of the forced breeding limit. This has an enormous social effect that hasn't even been studied yet. Can you imagine the impact? I can't.

    I will not set foot in China, not even as a tourist. To do so would be to give support to this inhuman regime. My greed would not motivate me to contribute to them, and my stated desire to see a fundamental, complete end to the communist system in China, would and probably should make travelling there a political impossibility.

  372. Re-education by superyooser · · Score: 1
    All this hysterical bleating about being dragged off for re-education is just absolute nonsense.

    Sounds like a thorough brainwashing to me

    "It is the government that has given me a second life," Wang said. "I have totally woken up and I think I should persuade people still addicted to Falun Gong to wake up, too.
    Disclaimer: I do not support Falun Gong's ideology; only its freedom to exist.
  373. China versus USA by zagatka · · Score: 1, Interesting

    this has been a facinating thread. Talking about China and comparing USA to China. I was born and raised in Eastern Europe and lived there untill I was 18 under what was called a "communist" regime. I ate enough bullshot there to last me a life time or so I thought. I have lived in USA for the last 21 years. I have seen both sides of the coin. Now I KNOW much better and i can smell bullshit from a mile away. USA is no btter or worse than ANY other country in the world. US citizens live in a fantasy world. The majority are ill eduicated and ill equiped to do anything but to consume and consume some more. Shurb used the word freedom 29 times in his speech. USA loves to use words such a s freedom and democracy. Please. The expression "Money talks and bullshit walks" describes USA perfectly. In USA you get as much freedom as you have money. No money no "freedom". It is as simple as that. You think USA doesn't censore its news? You think USA doesnt monitor its citizen's Internet access? You think there is no such thing as wage slavery in USA? Ask the "native Americans" who are spending their years in jail for fighting the USA government. They are the political prisoners in modern day USA. There is a conciderable number of them too. Remember Wounded knee? Maybe not. Bush will be spending billions of dollars for Iraq and Aphanistan, while there is hundreds of mentally ill people in the USA who will be spending a cold night on the street in USA tonight. Freedom? Freedom to do what? Consume more of the world's resources? I have asked Americans what exactly they can DO that i cannot do anywhere else and they were hard to give me an answer. Most often I was told to go back where I came from if I dont like it in "here" meaning USA. What a logical responce. USA is just another bully today. Maybe 200 years ago it did stand for something special but no more. I hope USA goes down as fast as possible. I hope the countries of the world unite against USA and fight it economically so USA will learn just how irrelevent it has become. Go China, go!

    1. Re:China versus USA by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Okay, so you've been here for 21 years huh... I call bullshit. Can I have some money now?

      Where do you live in the US? I grew up in a mobile home where my dad paid bills month to month but was self-employed as a custom picture framer. We lived in a small rural town in South Carolina with about 200 residents... the schools served 3 towns in the area - we had to ride a bus an hour to get to school each morning and to get home each afternoon.

      But those schools were top notch and I got a very good education, honors program sponsored by Apple computers where I learned Basic and logic diagrams in the second grade, we had a spanish teacher for one class a day... plenty of computers to do work on and intramural sports, soccer, football, baseball, basketball, etc....

      Point is that between public funding and a little corporate bonus I had a very good education which prepared me for higher learning and opened my mind to opportunity. Not everyone in the school took advantage of it... lots of kids were more interested in goofing off or playing hookie. I have no idea what happened to them but they were offered every opportunity...

      The high school had classes in Japanese, Russian, French, Spanish, Latin, Greek and German... this is a school with less than 2,000 students - what we called a 2A school (it goes up to 5A with over 4500 students). There were plenty of scholarships available to anyone who cared.

      I moved to California when I was 14 though so I ended up in a much larger high school in a very diverse area with a much more wealthy economy... the school was less than I'd hoped for.. basically just a GPA mill where over half the students needed tutors just to pass their grade because the teachers didn't teach... so having lots of money around doesn't guarantee quality of life.

      The US is what the people make of it. It is a land of opportunity and if you work hard you can take advantage of what's available... or you can just take it all for granted or worse yet you can slack off and fall through the cracks into a social slum and end up poor and ignorant.

      So bitch and moan about missing out on it all, just realize that it is there for anyone who wants it bad enough. It doesn't take money, it takes hard work. Just because you're a resident it doesn't mean you're a citizen, even if you were born here... citizenship is a privilege you must earn, not an entitlement you are born with.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    2. Re:China versus USA by zagatka · · Score: 1

      your responce was utterly meaninless. ALl you did is spew forth more meaningless jargon "USA is the land of opportunity" and talked about your life. Actually I AM a USA citizen, so what? And YES Iam making plan of going back to where I came from. and I wasn't bitching and moaning about anything. I was trying to point out a few things about USA. The topic is deep. It will take me a book to write about everything I wanna talk about.

  374. Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously your greed will trump your respect for freedom anyway, so why bother asking. Go. Don't come back please.

  375. Things really must be different there by scribblej · · Score: 1

    Here in the states, my wife only commits adultery *after* she gets stoned.

  376. Just because you are not racist by david274 · · Score: 1

    The sad part of all of this arguing is that we each think we are right. Ralph Wiley, who recently passed away, once wrote on Nolan Richardson being fired from the University of Arkansas under dubious circumstances. He wrote, "hey, just because you ain't racist doesn't mean Nolan didn't run into bigotry in Arkansas. Don't take it personal. It's not about whether or not your feelings are hurt." I do not consider myself racist, yet I am a fool to think that there are not people in America who look down upon and scorn people of a race unlike their own. There are Republicans who are racist, and there are Democrats who are racist. And, there a probably many people of both parties who are not racist. When someone accuses another person of racism, I should not defend that person just because I have some of the same beliefs as him (or same party affiliation). It is not an attack on me. Racism is a personal belief. Luckily, in America, it is not longer a public policy. Link to article: http://espn.go.com/page2/s/wiley/020306.html

  377. Re:R.E.S.T.E.C.P. by Centurix · · Score: 1

    Keep it real, innit

    --
    Task Mangler
  378. Re:Have you ever LIVED in CHINA? by LeneJ · · Score: 1
    Can you imagine bashing Bush in Central Park in New York or bashing Blair in London and worrying that someone might hear it and get you into trouble?

    Ehh, yes. I live in the US. I am a foreigner. I am constantly afraid I will be thrown out if I say something too negative about the government. I have been a foreigner in many countries, and this is the first time I am actually afraid of being deported. Hence, I shut up.

    --
    Un paio di scarpe, per favore!
  379. Not Bush by mynickname · · Score: 1

    During the election Bush blocked access to his website from other nations, I guess this is not specific to China.

  380. Same in Japan by brodin · · Score: 1

    Same thing in Japan. My friend, who spoke WAY BETTER Japanese than I was often asked if she was retarded because she couldn't read Japanese whereas people were always singing my praises. Of course, that actually points out that you really suck but that is another post...

  381. couldn't get wired.com but all the BT was good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i got back from spending a month in Shanghai in December. I'm not a huge slashdotter...so i don't remember if i even tried it from there...but i do remember not being able to get wired.com...which i thought was funny. I didn't try any work arounds...mostly because it didn't really seem like that big of a deal...but the cool thing was downloading the Daily Show and other TV via BT...i also used my vonage VoIP phone, which was quite cool...local US incoming and outgoing calls without a single problem.

    enjoy it.

  382. I am in China now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I first arrived, /. was blocked. It was unblocked a few weeks later. I asked a friend on Y!M who was located in Japan if there was any reason he could see that it was blocked and he couldn't.

    A little while ago, wikipedia was blocked. That didn't last too long - a week or two IIRC.

    Groklaw has been blocked for the whole time I've been here....but...(checking)...wow...it isn't any more! (That's the first time I've seen it while in China [when not on a company VPN]).

    The news.bbc.co.uk site has also ben inaccessible, but the news radio and tv feeds are not blocked (I like to listen to Radio2, and watch the BBC TV News).

    There have been more blocks that are seemingly mistakes than intentional.

  383. bullshit neo-con history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the people chanting the "Saddam genocide" mantra tend to have far-right views that conveniently overlook:
    * US-sponsored african genocide, both internally as slave trading and externally as propping up vicious military dictatorships
    * US genocide of Native Americans. At least the Jews got their own country afterwards, and could keep their country (course, they resort to ethnic cleansing themselves to make room for their new citizens)
    * It was Reagan and Bush Sr. that normalized US relations with Iraq
    * It was Reagan and Bush that BLOCKED UN security council action for Iraq's use of chemical weapons
    * It was Reagan and Bush that sold actual weapons and chemical blueprints to Saddam
    * Saddam had built up his troops along the Kuwait border for WEEKS before invading. The US government's public response was "This is a regional matter". That is "diplomat-speak" for "we won't get involved; do what you want". Bush only spoke out against the invasion 3 days afterwards, after intense pressure by the Saudi Arabian government.

    Is Saddam a bad guy? YUP. Is he worse than other countries with better lobbyists to represent them? Debatable. Women in Iraq were legally and culturally almost equal to men; inside the Saudi Royal Kingdom, women are dogs to be locked inside burning buildings if they attempt to run outside without their burkhas.

  384. Re:China's Gov't is ruthless - (little)out of date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow! the pics were pretty bad - and white people do get off easy.... btw, though the leader mentioned in the two websites w/out links is no longer the president of China. It's Hu Jintao or something now. Just fyi. Those sites are a bit out of date. Also those pics are old too. It may be the the persecution of falun gong *is* spinning down a bit...

  385. One word. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taiwan.

  386. You can get around the Google Cache ban... by umofomia · · Score: 1
    Just replace the q= in the Google Cache URL with %71=

    For instance: http://216.239.57.104/search?q=cache:jo3aRe29uHsJ: slashdot.org/+slashdot&hl=en will be blocked by the firewall, but http://216.239.57.104/search?%71=cache:jo3aRe29uHs J:slashdot.org/+slashdot&hl=en will not. Congratulations, you've just successfully did a canonicalization exploit on their firewall! :)

    Hopefully they won't figure this out and fix their firewall...

  387. practice what we preach by idlake · · Score: 1

    "Freedom [...] Democracy [...] Human rights [...] Equality under the law [...] All of these are basic rights for all human beings"

    Oh, I agree. But perhaps the US should first practice what it preaches, because it is far from a shining example for these human rights. The US got democracy rather late compared to other nations, formal equality under the law was not achieved even only for African Americans until the 20th century (and still hasn't been achieved for others), the US government is getting more and more drive by religious fundamentalism, and the US record on freedom and human rights is pretty mixed (in many areas, including prison conditions, prison labor, health care, education, poverty, child mortality, etc.).

  388. Riiiiiiiiight. by Aldric · · Score: 1

    The US has been snatching people with no proof whatsoever - I believe in someone's guilt when they are declared guilty at a trial. Not because they were tortured for a couple of years with no charge,

    1. Re:Riiiiiiiiight. by kibler · · Score: 1

      The US has been snatching people with no proof whatsoever

      Either you work for the Pentagon and have inside knowledge, or you don't really have any basis for your last post.

    2. Re:Riiiiiiiiight. by LearnToSpell · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Government said it would charter a jet to fly Mr Habib back from Cuba. He will be free to go home.

      You miss that part?

  389. Re:Have you ever LIVED in CHINA? by aCC · · Score: 1

    But you are a foreigner. The Chinese are not foreigners in their own country, are they? Look at the demonstrations against Bush and Blair to see that it's no problem there.

    Now look at the demonstrations in China against their government... (tiananmen)

    Then you can understand why people look over their shoulders when they criticize their government publicly.

  390. Wow... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

    You are so naive. You actually think that we went into Iraq to liberate those people from their dictator? You actually think that we went in there to disarm Saddam Husein of his weapons of mass destruction? Do you think we actually thought he had WMD's? That's insane. Can you imagine how hated this war would be if instead of 2000 dead U.S. soldiers total we had 50,000 dead U.S. soldiers on the first day due to chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons used? If we actually thought he had them, it would have been tactically irresponsible for us to invade like that. Our government only told us that he had WMD's to sell it to us. If we acutally thought he had them, we would have bombed them from the sky instead of going in on the ground. Actually, that might not be true. We might have thought that he had them, but wouldn't really have them ready to deploy if we attacked quickly. And we probably organized our troops into smaller units to minimize the effectiveness of mass weapons against us.

    Anyway. our military strategy is not based on right and wrong or human rights or spreading freedom. It is based on one thing: always keeping the United States in a good position in the world.

    By the way, most Iraqi's didn't like their dictatorship and most people in China don't care if the government controls all the corporations as long as they can make money and buy cell phones, bootleg DVD's, and knock-off Louis Vuitton handbags.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
    1. Re:Wow... by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1
      most people in China don't care if the government controls all the corporations as long as they can make money and buy cell phones, bootleg DVD's, and knock-off Louis Vuitton handbags

      That's close. More accurately, they simply don't think about it. My brother's wife, who is from China, found it utterly astonishing that we talk about politics in this country, and discuss whether or not the government is doing the right thing. It simply hadn't occurred to her to even think about whether the government was right or wrong, in the same way that most people don't worry about whether the sky should be blue. (I happen to find that question interesting too, and I wouldn't be surprised if some other slashdotters did too, but that's another matter.)
    2. Re:Wow... by stinerman · · Score: 1

      most people in China don't care if the government controls all the corporations as long as they can make money and buy cell phones, bootleg DVD's, and knock-off Louis Vuitton handbags.

      Remove "China" and replace with "America" and it still rings true.

  391. Breaking the Law?! Pfffff! by blingbing · · Score: 1

    Well I am late to the party, but being chinese and all, I feel obliged to contribute my 2 cents.

    There is a lot of talking about how circumstancing the Great Fire Wall is breaking chinese law and commie will put you in jail etc.

    Well the situation is rather more complicated.

    Rule of laws never really established in China's long history. It's rather "rule by law". Emperors enacted laws to govern the people, law is common people's enemy, law isn't there to ensure justice but to install order.

    Even in mordern china, people don't respect law. Laws are often written by government agency in a hasty and rubber-stamped by a stooge congress, without much consultation of the people.

    people get around law whenever they can and more often then not nobody cares. Piracy is supposedly illegal, prostitution is supposedly illegal, but in any city you can find DVDs for $1.00 and massage parlors on certain streets. everybody's driving like there is no traffic law. waiting lines are for suckers in theater or public trans tick counter. that's just for common people.

    for big crooks and shady businesses, wining, dining and bribing are the grease the oil the wheel. business even MNCs look for preferential treatment 1st fair competition 2nd.

    Unless you are in china with a mission to overthrow the government, getting around the Great FireWall is the last thing anyone would care.

    petty crimes are expected, you almost can't live without commiting a few daily.

  392. Re:PRC is posting to /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Says someone who clearly has never been to China.

  393. Poor moderation by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    How did Crows post get modded at Troll and Flamebait? You can't mod down the TRUTH!!! Freedom is a humans born right!

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  394. MOD UP relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The differences are decreasing. No joke.

  395. Fuck the Fulan Gong. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    The Fulan Gong is a bullshit cult which bases itself on two things. . .

    1. A wide support base filled with naive members given lots of good credos and compassionate spiritual laws to follow so that they seem altruistic and nourishing and all that good stuff while they spread their belief system.

    2. When you get deeper into their literature, (and not even that much deeper), you discover that the higher end of the cult bases itself on the grafting of a 'Fulan', an energy being, onto one's own energy in return for 'special powers'. --Grafting an energy being into your own energy is fucking creepy, and I have never heard of any such case which is not parasitic in nature. It's just another energetic feeding arrangement designed to screw humans. It is all the more shocking in a place like China, where where everybody knows about energy and chi and doesn't dispute that reality. They know about demons and they know about energy vampirism. So what the hell? --A demon called by any other name is still a fucking demon. How dumb do you have to be to fall for basic re-wording and PR gloss?

    And that's what it is. The Fulan Gong, like any cult worth its salt, has a very well orchestrated self-promotion and public relations arm. Like Israel, the Fulan Gong likes to make a very big deal about it's own persecution.

    The fact of the matter is that there have been MANY spiritual groups which have been savaged by the government in China. --And many of them are far, far more legitimate than the Fulan Gong. I'm no fan of Facism, but the Fulan Gong is just another dangerous lie and it can go rot. I sympathize with the pains suffered by its ignorant followers; their stories really are tragic, but on the other hand. . . I really wish people would read and think for two minutes about the literature offered by a cult before joining it. Membership in any of the stupid religions to which most of this world belongs would be non-existent if people used their brains. Christianity, Judaism, Islam. . , they're all dumb and dangerous lies desgined to misdirect and bleed humans. --Witness the world today!

    An interesting side-note. . . High level Scientologists are also into grafting energy beings directly onto its followers, but they're savy enough to conceal that fact and base their whole bullshit cult on secrets; you don't know what the heck you've really joined until you've been a (paying) member for fifteen years! Any spiritual group which as a policy keeps secrets from people making inquiries out of genuine interest should automatically be avoided.

    Ignorance endangers. Knowledge protects.


    -FL

  396. Re:Well...ABC also means... by littlewild · · Score: 1

    American Born Chinese = Banana man.

    The skin is yellow but when you peel it open it's while inside. No offense, I am a chinese too.

  397. My 2001 summer visit... by J_Omega · · Score: 1

    I was fortunate enough to spend two weeks in China, and 3 days in HongKong, in 2001. I (a white US citizen) was there as a tourist. This had been my first trip overseas.

    Beijing and Shanghai seemed like foreign countries compared to the body of the nation. HongKong (part of China now) felt a world away.

    I can't speak on the tech side of things. My vacation gave me an opportunity to escape the net and I was grateful for it, really.

    My personal experiences were great. The people were very friendly, from the elderly to children. I never once felt in danger or threatened. In fact, I found people to be more helpful and courteous than most Americans. Mind you, I was concerned that I'd accidentally do something to insult people, so I tried to watch and learn and not step on people's toes. I was overly worried. Don't act like the sterotypical American guffah, and you should be OK.

    Many wanted to speak with me, I felt, because they wanted to practice their English. Our tourguide taught us only a few minor phrases. I tried to use them when possible, but there were few Chinese I'd met who I could not communicate directly with myself, in English.

    People did seem to avoid discussion on events though, if we spoke in public. In private, people would open up. For instance, our tourguide would not discuss politics, religion, etc. while we we out and about. However, he made it a point to discuss these topics when the group had privacy.

    Ah, another instance, which I suppose goes against what I'd said about speech earlier... My last night in Beijing, I wanted to see some of the nightlife of the city. After not being able to convince any in the group (we were beat down tired, and I was the youngin'...) to come out with me, I decided to brave the city alone. Perhaps not too brave (i WAS alone, 12000 miles from home,) I found the nearest bar to the hotel. Anyhews, NOONE in the establishment spoke English. It took me ~3 mins just to get the point across that I'd enjoy a beer. After getting about 1/2-way through it, a man who I can only surmise was the owner/manager wanted to apparently show me around. AFAICould tell, it was his residence as well. He was proud to show off his artworks, allowed me to play with this gorgeous ~15-string lute-thingy, etc. In short order, he moved a curtain from the wall which had behind it a door... painted as the American flag!!! Inside was a small shrine/prayer area, and I was able to please him just because I recognized and commented "Dali Lama" on the photo he had of him and the Dali Lama. I think those two words were the only ones said that both of us understood.

    The point here being that people did not practice free speech, but seemed to let me in on their lives if some sort of privacy was available.

    Economically, well... Being a student, I certainly wasn't fincancially well off, and I needed to do considerable budgeting to afford the trip. Total cost ended up being around $2000 US for all expenses, including airfare, trinkets bought, beer, etc. For that $2k over 2+ weeks, I felt like I was treated like a foreign dignatary or some such. We stayed at 4-star hotels (much better than hotels I've stayed at here in the states,) had all our whims looked after diligently, and ate like kings. I almost felt out of place (economic status) staying at "Hotel Beijing." After a week, we needed to ask our guide to stop ordering SO MUCH food for us, we were given enough to feed 4 people each. ( That's four voracious American people. )

    Hong Kong was, well, it felt like a British china-town. Go figure. Its a special province, and even citizens need a passport to travel in and out. An interesting place, for sure, but I'd rather have spent my few days there as more time in Shanghai.

    I suppose I'm not responding to the questions being asked by the poster, and instead just blabbing on telling stories here, so I'll wrap it up.

    Great vacation, great people, great scenery, great accomodations, great food, great prices (haggle everywhere!!!). The freedom thing does need some work, but the people do seem to want it.

    Here's hoping that your travels are as rewarding as mine were! =)

  398. No worries by bw5353 · · Score: 1
    I just spent a few months in China. I found only one website that was blocked by the Chinese: news.bbc.co.uk. The rest of BBC worked fine, and every other site in the world that I tried to go to was available. If you are a porn addict and have favourite sites you go to regularly, it is possible that you may be out of luck, but considering what some people around me in the internet cafés occasionally watched, it cannot be that limited.

    On the other hand, even if your favourite sites happen to be blocked, would it really be that bad? You will probably find a few thousand other interesting sites instead. The internet is bigger than my garden.

  399. Don't talk about freedom. Slashdot hates it by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    This is slashdot. People here do not want you to talk about freedom. Noticed how you got modded? I guess they just have an affinity for sadomasochism.

    The fact remain however. You can NOT have peace without victory. That is an undeniable fact of life. Anyone who states otherwise does not understand human nature and/or psychology.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  400. You need psychological help by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    So go, move to China. Better yet, move to N. Korea. But don't cry when your not allowed to post on slashdot from withen said countries.

    Your brainwashed. Please for the love of humanity, seek psychological help. You are in dire need therapy.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  401. Freedom (generally) by paolooprandi · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't like to comment on freedom in China. I know very little about it. What I do know is in the West freedom is a misused concept, spouted like it was obvious what it meant.

    Am I free because I am indocrinated with the ideologies that Western culture spouts? Am I free to because I fetishize consumerist culture? Maybe...

    The trouble is I don't think so. If laws stopped me being indocrinated with false ideology, they wouldn't be bad, they would be doing there job - keeping me free.

    I am not defending the Chinese administration, but I am offering a different side to the coin and I am saying we are not free in the West. We have been targeted from so many angles, ingrained with self-replicating and false ideologies, we don't know freeedom is.

    The common belief is that money makes us free - our second home in the country makes us free. But no, money incarcerates us in a vicious cycle of production and consumption. Good luck China, I say... escape the free World's view on freedom. It has incarcerated us.

    I look to India and China for the future of humanity, after all, it is the hope of one of the few ideologies that made any sense - Buddhism

  402. The US Goverment and Kent State. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    "The US Govt has used the army against its own population. Check the protests in the 60's"

    This is not true. Here is a link about the shootings at Kent State.
    A few highlights.

    "May 2 Ohio National Guardsmen are sent to Kent State after the University's Army R.O.T.C. building is burned down."

    Notice these are not federal troops but national guard units under state control.

    "May 3 Ohio Governor James A. Rhodes personally appears on campus and promises to use "every force possible" to maintain order. Rhodes denounces the protesters as worse than brownshirts and vows to keep the Guard in Kent "until we get rid of them.""

    The Governor not the federal goverment gave the orders.

    "uly 23 Key portions of a secret Justice Department memo are disclosed by the Akron Beacon Journal. The memorandum describes the shootings as unnecessary and urges the Portage County Prosecutor to file criminal charges against six Guardsmen."
    The federal goverment steps in.
    It was a terrible thing but the differences are huge. The troops where not ordered to shoot. They paniced. The students had alread burnned down a building before this happened so the guardsman had a real fear to deal with.
    And the fact that all this information is out in the open and is being questioned makes all the difference.
    Here is the link if you want to check it out http://members.aol.com/nrbooks/chronol.htm

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  403. Detect Re:Freedom is not an by Psyqlone · · Score: 1

    Um, Mao was not in charge of China last time I checked. Dubya is. Let's stay on current events.

    Which alternative reality are you posting from?

  404. Parent a Troll? WTF? by Kosi · · Score: 1

    What on earth has ridden the guy who modded the parent Troll? It just points out the obvious!

    1. Re:Parent a Troll? WTF? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      Because, you see, moderators are so scared shitless of passing for nazis that they will do it so no one can ever think that they may be nazis by not criticizing jewish criticism.

      But that trick does not work on me, so I keep criticizing the jews (they can whine all they want, I don't give a shit and no one else of significance does either).

    2. Re:Parent a Troll? WTF? by Kosi · · Score: 1

      I keep criticizing the jews

      And I critizise the Israeli government or assholes like those demonstrating that they want to keep the stolen land. I don't care about the origin, race, belief or whatever, murderers like Sharon belong to prison, not a position of power.

  405. Re:Have you ever LIVED in CHINA? by LeneJ · · Score: 1

    I never said anything about China. I don't condone what the Chinese government does or did.

    I just pointed out that in this "free" country, I don't feel free at all!

    --
    Un paio di scarpe, per favore!
  406. the food by mzinni · · Score: 1

    The standard for "cleanliness" there is different than in the US. Don't be shocked by what you see in the restrooms (as well as the slit toilets). Also, no matter how good it smells, do not eat anything from the street vendors. Most people I've met there are very, very interested in talking to a Westerner and were extremely polite.

  407. fix to previous by stinerman · · Score: 1

    whoops...meant to hit preview

    Remove "China" and replace with "America" as well as switch "government" and "corporations" and it still rings true.

  408. Pathetic "racist" card attempt, You owe an apology by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    Your arguments, however, seem to be more predicated on a vilification of the Japanese as a race and nation ...

    That is a pathetic attempt at playing the "racist" card. Normally the most heated of exchanges do not bother me but you crossed the line. I expect an apology for that one.

    Note my use of "Imperial Japan" and "Imperial Japanese" throughout my posts. I do so to differentiate Imperial Japan of the 1930s and 40s from the Democratic Japan that followed. My vilification is of a government that was rightfully removed from the face of the earth nearly sixty years ago and its agents who committed war crimes beyond imagination. The only thing you could conceivably criticize is that I did not specify the 1930-40s timeframe. Imperial Japan's behavior in the First World War, and possibly the Russo-Japanese War but I could be mistaken, was "civilized" with respect to non-combatants and prisoners.

  409. Good information to have by carpus · · Score: 1

    While I definitely agree with the R.E.S.P.E.C.T thread, I would like to see the answers to a couple questions raised here.

    If you are going to change countries, you'd better plan to live by their rules. The US ain't perfect (or other 'free-er' countries), but you don't appreciate some of the perks until they're gone.

    That said, I have dealings with a certain multinational company which has an affiliated company in China. I would like to better understand what their Chineese affiliate gets to see from their end, and what their life is like, particularly with regards to technology and freedom.

    It appears China is not as it was 10 years ago, but much more open to change and modernization. What restrictions are imposed on Internet traffic? I am familiar with them modifying DNS queries.

    I would rather not hear of circumvention techniques. I'm sure intelligent people can figure them out on their own, and smart ones probably don't do them.
    Besides, if someone *does* circumvent the restrictions, let's not encourage the closing of the loopholes by writing about them. That doesn't help anyone.

    Anyone care to (or have the knowledge) to detail the restrictions China imposes on the Information Superhighway?

  410. All that is necessary for evil to triumph... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm sure that the oppressed and occupied Tibetans and Uighurs just luuuuv and respect the wonderful Chinese with the same blind gusto as you do. Yeah right, "be sensitive of the feelings of Chinese and don't worry about repressed freedoms", and especially "don't listen to anyone who says China sucks or is oppressive" cause they're so unlike the Nazi-era Germans or the Soviet Russians who turned the other way when their government committed crimes against humanity.

    I think you just forgot to mention that "any Tibetan or Uighur who doesn't love China is a freaking criminal splittist dog that needs to be exterminated".

    All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing

    1. Re:All that is necessary for evil to triumph... by dalutong · · Score: 1

      one -- remember that there is progress. it is hard to see day to day but it is easy to see if you look back ten years. when i went to china for the first time in 92 it was a totally different place than it is now. hey -- they are having the first direct flights to taiwan in 55 years now!!

      I lived next to Tibet. I've travelled to Xinjiang several times. Does the Chinese government treat the people there as they should be treated? No. Does that mean that every person's life is miserable? No. Some of my best friends in the world are Uighur.

      The reality is that change takes time. If you want to help don't hate the Chinese -- support multi-track initiatives that will help support the establishment of the norms necessary for democracy to succeed sometime in the future. It is already happening in urban China. it will be a while before it gets to rural china and to the autonomous regions.

      really man -- i'm not fighting you. i want equality for all people. i just want the slow and sure way. i don't bother hating; it's not worth the time.

      www.cidcm.umd.edu -- if you want more info on multi-track stuff. And read that guy Azar -- needs-based government. it doesn't come from the top-down.

      so that is how i'm acting. what are you doing?

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    2. Re:All that is necessary for evil to triumph... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Look mr diplomat brat, I mean, mate, :-)

      I believe you're genuinely a good kid (esp. for an american), but your fascination with neo-imperial China has blinded you to the real bad stuff that comes with its authoritarian policies. "Don't listen to anyone who says China is oppressive". Now there's a moral brain fart up there with the best.

      Despising China's oppressive occupation of its neighbours first and foremost, and its (corrupt) domestic one-party control secondly, doesn't mean hating the Chinese people individually. However ultimately the Chinese people are collectively responsible for their nation's crimes against others. Perhaps as an american you can't truly sympathize with a small nation under threat of national, cultural, linguistic and even religious (in the case of Tibet) extinction by its expansionist neighbour, but surely you could and should learn to appreciate the seriousness of such crime. Supporting democratic development or "multi-track initiatives" is supremely important, but we must not ignore the fact that invading and annexing another country is the worst kind of crime and equal to Nazi holocaust or Russian pogroms.

      The world's business community lead by example by the USA has turned its back on the plight of Tibetans and Uighurs because it is both convenient and lucrative (in the short term at least) but it has meant conveniently forgetting all about international justice, morality and ultimately modern humanity. Not condemning China for its continuing foreign occupations is akin to aiding and abetting the Nazis or the Soviets in their past (or in the case of Russia, current) military invasions and annexations.

      The US attacked Iraq in 1991 over the latter's 1990 invasion of tiny Kuwait, which was nevertheless culturally, linguistically, religiously and historically related to Iraq and originally chiselled off as a separate entity by imperial Britain for dubious reasons. Anyway that "forced re-unification" of Kuwait was a crime and rightfully repelled (although war should always the be very last resort). Kuwait's national identity was a recent British invention and their cultural, linguistic or religious identity was never in any danger despite the annexation. Now compare Iraq's invasion of Kuwait and the West's (and esp. USA's) reaction to it to the infinitely more sinister Chinese invasion and annexation of Tibet. Surely the Tibetans deserve the right of self-determination at least as much as the Kuwaitis? But why was Iraq attacked and embargoed while China's been given the equivalent of MFN trading status? Ask your folks. America claims to be "supporting freedom everywhere"? Sure, they only forgot to add "but only when it is financially profitable".

      I didn't grow up in Beijing or reality-warping diplomatic circles (which are ultimately only about advancing national interests instead of global justice), but I've travelled, lived in and studied China and its history and politics since the eighties so you might as well get off your idealistic high horse and try developing your moral consciousness with your feet on the ground.


      Ubuntu!

    3. Re:All that is necessary for evil to triumph... by dalutong · · Score: 1

      Damn man. You sure do make a lot of assumptions for someone who who is telling ME to get off of MY high horse.

      First of all -- I am a very atypical "diplomatic brat." I went to a bilingual school whose mission it was to make _global_ citizens. I despised my fellow diplomatic community for all of the reasons you stated.

      I can answer some of your questions though.

      Why is China given MFN-like status? For two reasons, primarily because it is extremely financially benefitial to the U.S. and others and also because, unlike Iraq, it is moving in the direction of tolerance, openness, and individual freedom.

      As for the Chinese people being collectively responsible for the actions of their government; that's just absurd. If that was true then the killings of arressor-nations civilians would be justifiable. It would mean that kidnapping and killing Americans in Iraq would be okay and that Israel's killing of Palestinian civilians would be okay. Unfortunately in the majority of the world's conflicts (which are almost all intra-state) defining the aggressor is very hard.

      I don't defend what China does in Xinjiang. When I am in China I frequently have conversations with the Chinese people (both in Xinjiang and elsewhere) about what the government is doing to Xinjiang. I often parallel it with Israel's settlements in Palestine. Sometimes they react furiously, frequently they start to better sympathize with the Uighurs. I employ two techniques when I meet Chinese. Because I am fluent in Chinese I can convince most (who have never met Uighurs) that I am Uighur. If that doesn't work then I play the very useful card of convincing them that I am a zhongguotong (comrade of china.) Sometimes I mix them and get them to call me a zhongguotong before I "inform" them that I am Uighur. It gives my arguments a lot of credibility. I've done a lot more than talk -- but you don't seem very interested in considering me an equal so I won't even bother.

      And don't call me American. When I moved back to the US in 1999 I hated it. The only way I could stand living here was to consider it a foreign nation. And as you know, since you are well traveled, you don't always approve of everything in the country you've visiting. But you find what there is to love and you focus on that. Like (I think) I said, I wouldn't run around Saudi Arabia disrespecting everyone because I didn't agree with what they believe.

      Another note: I wrote this because there were some rediculously hostile towards China. If you tell someone that they should not go to China because you disagree with what the government does and you think that they're going to be thrown in jail then you're just stupid. And you're depriving them of a great experience.

      And, for a finale, I'm not going to devalue your experience. I'm not going to tell you that your idea of China is warped by western stereotypes. I'm not going to insult you. I hope that is only a temporary difference between the two of us.

      Americans say "no problem." I saw "no worries." I have no nationality.

      And I use Ubuntu, too.

      (oh yeah -- and why do you post as AC?)

      feel free to email me -- or to AIM me (same as the beginning of my email)

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
  411. Herro! I want ask srashdot!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    actually, i'm having a hard time deciding whether the original poster, cliff, is a cop from china. posting a request for chinese citizens to publicly state:

    No, because then the question would have been?

    HERRO! I want ask Srashdot persons, how can tourist to China pass by comprex internet security?

  412. China by bl33p · · Score: 1

    I lived in Shanghai for about two years (2001-2003). While living there, my biggest tech problem with was the horribly slow and unstable internet connections. Hopefully they've fixed that by now.

    As far as non-resolving DNS, connections being blocked and so-on, that does happen on occassion. What I did was set up an SSH tunnel to a squid proxy outside of the country. If I remember correctly, they block port 3128 going out, so the tunnel was more so that they wouldn't detect the proxying. Honestly, I don't even know if they checked. All my email going in and out of the country was through SSL/TLS encrypted connections to the servers, so that was pretty much safe. Unless you're going on behalf of a religious organization (or equivalent) though, that shouldn't really matter.

    If you do go, enjoy it. I miss living there, myself. The most important thing as a foreigner is not protecting yourself from the government (cuz honestly, they don't really care what kind of information you're getting, unless you're overtly attempting to brainwash the local people with it). It's going there with an open mind. Don't be quick to judge the local people by your own standards. Don't apply your preconceived notions based on things you've heard in western media. Take time to understand where people come from and why they hold the mindsets that they do. If you do, your experiences will definitely be unforgettable.

  413. That majority is a one headed monster by aquarian · · Score: 1

    The PATRIOT act passed because a majority in the House and Senate thought it was a good idea, and the President agreed.

    Good idea how? Good for the country, or good for the political careers of politicians afraid to dissent from the GOP leadership? That majority does not tolerate dissent. It's "with us, or against us," remember?

  414. Re:Have to mod "clueless" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seem to forget that the past fifty years includes China's invasion of India, and border skirmishes with Russia and Vietnam. Not to mention ongoing repression in Tibet and threatening Taiwan, and claiming the entire South China Sea in violation of international law. The list goes on.

    China is pacifistic only in your dreams. Sheesh, have they outlawed the study of history in your country?

  415. Re:Freedom IS an incompatible world view with Chin by glennrrr · · Score: 1

    I believe you are forgetting that Confucian thought has always been a philosophy of the ruling elite. Other philosophies: Taoism and Buddhism have more universal appeal and are more compatible with western ideals of individuality. Buddhists are so individualistic they reject even the obligations of their own family.

    To buy into the idea that Confucianism maps one to one with traditional Chinese culture or philosophy is to ignore the vast majority of Chinese people.

  416. ABC Experiences in Japan and Sexism by billstewart · · Score: 1

    One of my former coworkers was ABC. His sister and her also-ABC husband moved to Japan, doing some kind of high-tech management. The husband did ok, but the wife got tired of it really fast. It seems that even though she had a perfectly good college degree and was highly competent, and Japanese are used to Western women working and not acting Japanese, as an Asian she was expected to behave like a proper salaryman's wife even though she was Chinese, and being American-born she had no intention of putting up with that nonsense. She found a good job back in the States fairly quickly; it took her husband a bit longer, but he had the motivation that she was back here.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  417. ABCs and Language Issues by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Here in the San Francisco Bay Area, there are a lot of Nth-generation Chinese-Americans. Some speak Chinese, many don't, and of course there's also the different dialects, with Cantonese-speaking Hong Kongers, Mandarin-speaking Taiwanese, the occasional Hakka or other dialects. Sometimes business around here gets done in Chinese, when most of the people around are Chinese, but sometimes it's English.

    When I lived back east, I had a coworker whose grandparents had immigrated to the US from Japan. They were ethnic minorities, and she'd occasionally have people walk up to her assuming she was Chinese and start speaking Chinese at her, which wasn't useful (she'd do just fine in French, and knew a bit of kitchen Japanese from mom talking to grandma.) I assume ABCs have similar issues, unless they happen to speak the right dialects fluently.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  418. Peru's Previous Government was no prize by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Peru has a history of corrupt left-wing military governments of various sorts, generally with little understanding of economics. People like liberal economist Hernando de Soto and novelist Mario Vargas Llosa have written about some of the problems with them - things like taking 9 months to get enough permits to open a simple business (it's much faster if you bribe everybody who issues permits, but the usual approach for poorer people was to simply not get the permits, and then pay the higher bribes when police come and harass you after you're in business.) The lack of enforceable property rights for most of the population was a serious problem - people couldn't get things like mortgages because of lack of clear land title.

    The Shining Path revolutionaries were wacko Maoists who could support themselves quite well because of the US's well-organized program for funding world terrorism and domestic crime, i.e. providing muscle to drug-lords who exported cocaine to the US at many times the free-market price. Many years they were more competent at violence than the government armies, and certainly were able to stick around for decades longer than they could have without US aid.

    Fujimori was somewhat like a crazier version of Ross Perot with less knowledge of economics - he did a bunch of things that were Not Stupid, which placed him well above average, used a lot of violence, including against many people who deserved it as well as people who didn't, staged a coup against his own government (I really had trouble following that one... but perhaps Bush/Cheney will show us how professionals do it), and was certainly not the best government the country could have had, but neither were his predecessors.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  419. why can't we mod posts, Incorrect? by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    Flamebait, and Offtopic don't fit. And Overrated is such a catch-all.