Slashdot Mirror


User: Che+Guevarra

Che+Guevarra's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
265
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 265

  1. Re:One more time! on Firefox Site Visits Up 237% · · Score: 1

    Hi, it's gaining ground. It's installed on the classroom computers at my University right next to Internet Explorer and I see the people sitting in front of me using it every day.

    The Firefox website visits are through the roof. Do you think they're all just readers or are some of them downloaders?

    Learn to draw a conclusion.

  2. Re:Validity of the article linked to? on Firefox Site Visits Up 237% · · Score: 1

    why let that get in the way of an open-source victory party?

    But seriously, Firefox is fantastic and more accolades are coming soon.

  3. Re:It's the name, stupid. on Firefox Site Visits Up 237% · · Score: 1

    My ex-wife was a fiery fox and she took everything. Free browsers are all I have left.

  4. Quality products rise to the top on Firefox Site Visits Up 237% · · Score: 1

    Damn straight. I was one of the doubters several years ago believing no open source project would ever have the resources needed to produce a product that could reach market acceptance. Not anymore. It's a full-on full-featured product. The university I attend has installed it next to IE on their classroom stations. To sum it up in several words, it kicks ass.
    The RSS integration is the biggest draw for me right now, Safari doesn't have it. (Mac user).

  5. Welcome to the time machine on Wisconsin Governor Proposing Tax On Downloads · · Score: 1

    Now everyone knows how it felt when the U.S. government instituted the income tax for the first time...

    Check your history books kids, lifes a bitch.
    They never stop taxing.

  6. Re:So what? on Is Google Breaking Their Own Rules? · · Score: 1

    A Monopoly is not defined by it's primary source of income, only it's primary hold on the market.

  7. Re:Con-man gains fame at others expense... on Mitnick: Security Not about Technology · · Score: 1

    I'm so sick of people here being proud of their ignorance. If you don't know what he's done, isn't it up to you to find out before passing judgement?

    I can pass judgement anytime I want because I know exactly what Mitnik "has done". He's a thief, tresspasser, liar, conman, and felon. I never said I was ingorant or proud of it. I asked why Mitnik is famous, and it sure as hell isn't because of his hacking techniques. It's because he stole and got caught. Save your pre-prepared pulpit speaches for when they apply.

  8. Re:Con-man gains fame at others expense... on Mitnick: Security Not about Technology · · Score: 1

    Okay, fine. He invented interesting hacking concepts. He IP spoofed and demonstrated that sequence number attacks were possible with the TC/I protocols. I'm boned. I know when to wave the white flag. But is that why this article is on Slashdot? Back to the original premise of my post, what has he done with his life? Is his hacking past it? Is that all there is? I guess so. He's famous, I'm not.

  9. Re:Con-man gains fame at others expense... on Mitnick: Security Not about Technology · · Score: 1

    01000100011001010110000101110010001000000100000101 11001101110011011010000110111101101100011001010010 11000010000001110000011011000110010101100001011100 11011001010010000001100101011000010111010000100000 01101101011110010010000001110011011010000110100101 11010000100000011000010110111001100100001000000111 01000110100001100101011011100010000001100100011010 01011001010010111000100000001000000101000000101110 01010011001011100010000000100000010110010110111101 11010101110010001000000110110101101111011011010010 00000110100101110011001000000110000100100000011000 11011101010110111001110100001000000110000101101110 01100100001000000100100100100000011001100111010101 10001101101011011001010110010000100000011010000110 01010111001000101110

  10. Re:Con-man gains fame at others expense... on Mitnick: Security Not about Technology · · Score: 1

    Oh, gosh, is that where I send fake header info to a receiving address and hope it will recognize my fake shit and let me into the network?

  11. Re:Con-man gains fame at others expense... on Mitnick: Security Not about Technology · · Score: 1

    I wish I could moderate because I couldn't moderate this up enough.

  12. Re:Con-man gains fame at others expense... on Mitnick: Security Not about Technology · · Score: 1

    You must be kidding. The only thing you've said is that he "tricked" people. And what did he actually do with it? Write his own software? Did he start his own company with the information he stole? No, he did nothing but post and run. He's an icon of shit hackers who do nothing but break networks and passwords. Here's a twenty dollar bill, no wait it's a two dollar bill. There, I've socially engineered you. Feel like you've been hacked?

  13. Re:so did the cop who busted him on Mitnick: Security Not about Technology · · Score: 1

    Kevin, is that you?

  14. Re:Policy, Process, Training. And still, holes. on Mitnick: Security Not about Technology · · Score: 1

    Closed mouth quiet type seeks employment. No benefits necessary. Off-shore bank account ready for transfer of pay checks.

  15. Slashdot.Nostalgia on Mitnick: Security Not about Technology · · Score: 1

    I'll comment more as soon as my 28.8 modem connects. Okay wait... Brrrrr-bzzzzz.zzzzzzz.iiiiiiii.zzzzzzz

  16. Con-man gains fame at others expense... on Mitnick: Security Not about Technology · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm so sick of this guy's so-called "hacker" fame. He tricked a bunch of early tech no-nothings into telling him their passwords and protocols and now he's living off it forever. Jobs and Woz hacked the phone system, but then they went on to produce something. What has this guy actually ever produced, written, made? Seriously, I don't know and maybe that's a problem. He must have produced something valuable, but I don't know what it is. I'm sure some Slashdot guy will tell me, but isn't it funny that no novice (like me) knows what the hell he's ever done creatively/intellectually in his life?

  17. Re:I don't think so on Free Wi-Fi Threatened? · · Score: 1

    so terribly valid

  18. What? on Having Fun With PowerBook Motion Sensors · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know how to turn this off? Because it's supposed to open my chute in about 3 seconds.

  19. Re:I don't think so on Free Wi-Fi Threatened? · · Score: 1

    And for God's sake, don't slap a regulatory body on it. Amtrack anyone? Slashdot, give us an edit button on posts. The preview button isn't good enough.

  20. Re:I don't think so on Free Wi-Fi Threatened? · · Score: 1

    Are you nuts? This an untapped giant industry in the making. Only by eliminating the "free" providers of wireless access can this entirely new industry get started. Think of the enormous number of jobs involved here. A WHOLE NEW INDUSTRY. Were' talking an annual industry revenue in the billions of dollars. It all starts here. Eliminate the free providers. Take the 'open' tag off this stuff. ----Ofcourse, I'm speaking economically. If I had my way, it would be free all the time.

  21. Re:It's a revenue issue for the state on Free Wi-Fi Threatened? · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The moderator who scored this post "redundent" may wish to wait for more than 20 posts to come in on a story before moderating next time. I was typing while the redundencies were being posted. Nice moderating.

  22. Re:This seems silly on Free Wi-Fi Threatened? · · Score: 1

    Like the way you don't get in trouble if you brew your own moonshine?

  23. Re:It's a revenue issue for the state on Free Wi-Fi Threatened? · · Score: 1

    Why you ask, will it not be hard to get rid of the free providers? Because the ISP's that route their traffic will shut them down by data transfer rate. Do you really think Mediacom and Quest won't climb on board with this?

  24. It's a revenue issue for the state on Free Wi-Fi Threatened? · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The govt wants the revenues from licensing. Commercial organizations will gladly pay it, but not if there a million coffee shops giving it way. They're trying to regulate the free providers out of existence. It won't be that hard to do.

  25. Re:Maybe it's just me... on AMD Plans Simultaneous Desktop and Mobile Chip Releases · · Score: 1

    Geek battle begin! "In 1965 Moore observed an exponential growth in the number of transistors per integrated circuit and predicted that this trend would continue." http://www.intel.com/research/silicon/mooreslaw.ht m