Slashdot Mirror


User: notherenow

notherenow's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
69
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 69

  1. Like nobody knows.... on Randomly Generated Paper Accepted to Conference · · Score: 1

    ...That Slashdot uses a program that randomly generates stories to cover.

  2. Great on Video Distribution Platform Aiming to Kill TV · · Score: 1

    Now the children are safe

  3. Wait just a second.... on Linux Can't Kill Windows · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I have a small and a big penis. Can you prove me wrong?

  4. Now just a minute... on Music Industry Drafts Code of Conduct for ISPs · · Score: 1

    ...If the artists would just make shotty music, we could all go back to the good-ol-days of low-speed internet.

  5. Re:Scary Stuff on Sea Life Wiped Out by Neutron Star Collision? · · Score: 1

    What is so scarry about this? Death is the last thing that happens every time. What's scarry is that people worry about it.

  6. Re:MIT parties are interesting on USB Disco Dance Floor · · Score: 1

    California, is druggy druggy druggy druggy! I'm from Alabama Alabama is, muddy muddy muddy muddy! Either way... MIT, is funny funny funny funny! ...sorry, I wondered in here by accident

  7. Re:sharing on ESA Aiming for Martian Probe in 2011 · · Score: 1

    Since when do Americans share in glory?

  8. Hahahaaa it's war... on Microsoft Collaborates On Child Porn Buster · · Score: 1

    Did anyone ever think about this...? I think that almost all the child-porn that is commonly seen on the internet today is a product of the U.S. government, on some level or another. The real child-porn people are probably so deeply hidden, that it is not right to think that they are just brodcasting it all over the net the way it is. Perhaps Microsoft and the Canadian government are going to try to prove this? I would like to see the results, but surely the only result we'll see is that of Microsoft suddenly gaining power.

  9. Re:Say goodbye to free air on Car Powered by Compressed Air · · Score: 1

    Well, here we go. Bush is going to start charging a large tax on air now. I hope he doesn't charge for all that hot air that's he's been blowing up our asses

  10. Now I know for sure... on Joke-e-oke Makes You a Comedian · · Score: 1

    Now I know for sure that /. is just an experiment. They want to know our reactions, and how far we are willing to go. Honestly, if it weren't for pure bordom, none of us would be looking for the latest gossip about the new things in the world. I can't take anything else here seriously. What next? Title reads: "Man discovers way to live off of elephant shit alone! "How sad... back to being bored ~~sigh.....

  11. Re:An Interesting Phenomenon on mc chris Answers Your Questions · · Score: 1

    The good thing about slashdot is that there are interesting people that add a bit to the crappy stories that leak through. I am just glad I scrolled down far enough to get this. What I did notice is that paint dries faster then this stuff does.

  12. Re:Ridiculous. on Australian ISPs Required To Report Child Porn · · Score: 1

    Dear Sir/Ma'am, I totally understand your view-point, and you are correct. But I think what everybody is on a soapbox about is the accuallity of the situation, and how rediculous it is. Really, how the hell is this helping the situation of CP anyway? Isn't that the point? To help the police put a stop to it? The reason they chose to apply penitlies in the form of fines, is because they feel that the ISP is turning a blind eye to the evidence. Now assuming that they ARE, why would they now do it? Because of the fines? How will the police know that they are not reporting? It's silly. It would be the same thing, if, let's say, the police go around to a known crack neighborhood, and tell the good people of the neighborhood that if they don't tell the police when crack deals happen, they will fine them. It is just a way that the police are trying to push off the blame on why THEY (the police) are not able to help stop CP. It's silly

  13. Re:RTFA on Australian ISPs Required To Report Child Porn · · Score: 1

    What I want to know is, how would the police know if someone ISN'T reporting the activities? I mean, if they are assuming that the ISP's are turning a blind eye to the evidence, how would they ever know if they are or not?

  14. Re:simple solution for an ISP... on Australian ISPs Required To Report Child Porn · · Score: 1

    The police are assuming that the ISP's are turning a blind eye to the evidence. I would turn the blind eye, as stated above

  15. Re:Simple solution on Australian ISPs Required To Report Child Porn · · Score: 1

    Okay, this is the only post that properly address the issue at hand. - thanks for it -. The problem is the "I" in ISP. Internet is what the Service is Providing. Hense the name. It would be like Wal-Mart not being able to sell a bullets along with a gun sale. -Oh wait, they can't...I wonder what this has done to prevent gun crimes.

  16. About molesting children on Australian ISPs Required To Report Child Porn · · Score: 1

    Don't touch that boy/girl. Instead, put them on a school bus drivin by a 65-year-old that can't see. And don't you give them any seatbelts, those are for adults ONLY!

  17. Re:Don't demonise them on Australian ISPs Required To Report Child Porn · · Score: 1

    I have to say, man, you're leaving yourself WIDE OPEN for attacks on this subject. Though you seem to be ahead of the game, others are not. I am not in favor of child porn, and can relate to what you've said about it. The whole age thing is a bit fucked up, especially sinse I personally know of a guy that had sex with a girl that was 17 (in america) but she told him that she was 18, and looked 18. Anyway he went to jail, where he was raped many times, and is now out of jail, and trying to get on with his life, all because he didn't check her ID, and he lives in Alabama, U.S.A. I would say that child porn is when there is a child who has not yet reached puberty, and is having unconsentual sex with another.

  18. ....continued on Grand Theft Auto Led Teen to Kill · · Score: 1

    And it's the police's fault for dieing. They could have simply used the cheat codes to get more life, and if their fingers were fast, they could have gotten armor too. :P

  19. Re:I'm pissed. on Grand Theft Auto Led Teen to Kill · · Score: 1

    I think GTA is to blame. Of coarse, this is the case only if the kid used a game controler to activate the cheat codes used to obtain the gun he killed the police officers with....cuase, that's what you have to do in the game