I think writing papers using XHTML and CSS 2.1 or 3 is a good idea. Then you can use Prince XML to convert it to PDF. Their site has a nice sample or two of journal articles / conference papers. The quality of the renderer is great. It was even used to create a professional book, Cascading Style Sheets: Designing for the Web.
I was looking at converting HTML into PDF and found Prince XML . Some authors of a professional book on CSS wrote it in HTML and used Price XML to generate the master PDF document they sent to the printing press. This page has what a PDF version of wikipedia would look like. You can change the look by just changing the CSS.
I guess you never heard ofSilicon Valley before. The San Andreas fault runs right through there. And there are many major fault lines that run through the Bay Area. It is really hard to build something in California that isn't near a fault line.
The graphs are cool. They show the spikes in queries relative to themselves or to what ever the query is being compared to in the graph. They should of shown the number of queries too. For instance, I cant compare Hurricane Katrina to the Pope because they are in seperate graphs with no numbers.
I have done a little bit with scanning music and I would like to tell you a little bit about my experiances.
1.) Original music is better. Lots of copies have "noise" in it. Some music OCR software packages see this as a dot and might make a note a stacatto note or a dotted half note, etc. or just confuse the heck out of the program.
2.) Try not to scan music that has a big fold in it. Many OCR programs use a b/w image and a fold in the paper looks like a big black line. This trows off lots of programs.
3.) Using a higher resolution than the highest suggested resolution doesn't help. If the program says to scan at 600dpi and you scan at 1200dpi, it will not do anything to help and at most it will hinder your scanning. Some programs will come out with the same result no matter what resolution you set above the reccomended level. This is a waste of time and disk space. Other programs will take advantage of the higher resolution. But this could be bad because the program will see how notes arent as round as they look at lower dpi. Also it is easier to see noise at higher dpi.
I hope these tips help.
Slashdot Mirror
The ISBN is wrong. It is 978-0124202313
With IE9 supporting HTML5, will that mean they will support the canvas tag too? Or do we have to wait for IE10?
I think writing papers using XHTML and CSS 2.1 or 3 is a good idea. Then you can use Prince XML to convert it to PDF. Their site has a nice sample or two of journal articles / conference papers. The quality of the renderer is great. It was even used to create a professional book, Cascading Style Sheets: Designing for the Web.
What good is a phone call... if you're unable to speak?
TTY/TDD, you insensitive clod!
I was looking at converting HTML into PDF and found Prince XML . Some authors of a professional book on CSS wrote it in HTML and used Price XML to generate the master PDF document they sent to the printing press. This page has what a PDF version of wikipedia would look like. You can change the look by just changing the CSS.
So X.org wasn't a threat to XFree86?
All your CUPS are belongs to Apple
I guess you never heard ofSilicon Valley before. The San Andreas fault runs right through there. And there are many major fault lines that run through the Bay Area. It is really hard to build something in California that isn't near a fault line.
The graphs are cool. They show the spikes in queries relative to themselves or to what ever the query is being compared to in the graph. They should of shown the number of queries too. For instance, I cant compare Hurricane Katrina to the Pope because they are in seperate graphs with no numbers.
Not work for Soviet Russia
Eclipse.
I have done a little bit with scanning music and I would like to tell you a little bit about my experiances.
1.) Original music is better. Lots of copies have "noise" in it. Some music OCR software packages see this as a dot and might make a note a stacatto note or a dotted half note, etc. or just confuse the heck out of the program.
2.) Try not to scan music that has a big fold in it. Many OCR programs use a b/w image and a fold in the paper looks like a big black line. This trows off lots of programs.
3.) Using a higher resolution than the highest suggested resolution doesn't help. If the program says to scan at 600dpi and you scan at 1200dpi, it will not do anything to help and at most it will hinder your scanning. Some programs will come out with the same result no matter what resolution you set above the reccomended level. This is a waste of time and disk space. Other programs will take advantage of the higher resolution. But this could be bad because the program will see how notes arent as round as they look at lower dpi. Also it is easier to see noise at higher dpi.
I hope these tips help.
I see court cases soon where people were unknowingly used for their bandwidth. Brings new meaning to the phrase "network backbone".